Paper chromatographic separation ofsilver(I), lead(ll), mercury(ll) and thallium(l) with solvents containing chloroform

Paper chromatographic separation ofsilver(I), lead(ll), mercury(ll) and thallium(l) with solvents containing chloroform

Paper chromatographic and thallium(l) separation of silver(l), lead(ll), mercury(ll) with solvents containing chloroform Some (Jf the possihilitics...

252KB Sizes 0 Downloads 30 Views

Paper

chromatographic and thallium(l)

separation of silver(l), lead(ll), mercury(ll) with solvents containing chloroform

Some (Jf the possihilitics of using chloroform and chloroform mixtures for inorganic paper cl~romatograpl~y have been dcscribcd previously*. In the present work, similar ion migration studies and measurements of Rfi- values for silver, lcad, mercury(I1) ant1 thnllium(1) were carried out with twenty different solvent mixtures each containing chloroform. IZCllgCdS

Silver(I), Icntl(II), mcrcury(I1) and thallium(I) solutions were prcparccl from tlic analytical re;tgent-graclc nitrates. All organic solvents used were twice-clistillccl ancl basis with the cxccption of their mixtures were prcparctl on a volume-volume Pure conccntratccl nitric acicl and glacial acetic acid (E:. Merck) phenol solutions. were used to acidify certain solvent mixtures. I-Voccdurc All studies were performed on 3 mm Whatman paper (xx cm cli;lmctcr) which was cut with wicks of 3-4 cm as clcscril>ccl previously1 12. For measurement of Ru vducs of individual ions, the paper discs were spottccl at the ccntrc with tlic solution containing 10-x5 pg of cation per drop of 0.02 ml using a micropipette. The wet spots wcrc outlined with pencil and the discs were clricd at room tcmpcraturc (cu. 25”). Thcsc were clcvclol~cd to obtain adequate migration of The solvent fronts were marked again and tile discs wet-c dried. the particular ion. A spray of yellow ammonium sulphidc was usccl to cletect the rings (Ag+, grcy ; l’b”‘, dark brown ; M@+, ldack; and Tl+, reddish brown, which faded gradually owing to oxidation of thallous sulphiclc to white sulphatc). All RF mcasurcmcnts were ma& with respect to inner (RF(~). aswell as outer (Xp(,,) eclgcs of the rings and the values in Table I arc the mean of several mcasurcmcnts at different points on a particular ring. Separations wcrc carried out similarly with more conccntratccl solutions of the ions (40 to 50 rug per drop) mixccl in quo1 volumes and then spotting with one drop of the mixture. Successful separations were obtained for the 4 ions studicd with solvents 2, 8, 12, and 18 (SW Table I for solvent composition). Good separations were obtained for Hg, Ag and ‘I’1 with solvents I, 4 and 14, for Hg, Pb and Tl with solvents 4 and 6, and for Ag, l-16’ ;cncl I’b with solvent 13. I>iscussiorc It W:LS lX>illtcd Out by l~IIh’l’NAGr\l~ANl) I’OONIA 1 that absolute cliloroform is not suitable for inorganic chromatography, but chloroform mixed with polar organic solvents allowed sufficient migration to give successful separations. LEUERER3, i’OLLARD d dJ and HAIMSAWA~ have also cmphasisccl the need for polar solvents for the effective separation of inorganic ions. The present stuclics with Ag+, PIG+, H@+ and Tl+ supports the use of mixed solvents containing chloroform for separation of inorganic species. The results in Table I show that the addition of polar solvents to

.drrrtl. Chh.

Acln.

30 (rg6.1) 310-312

=

50

49 50 49

I- f

zoo 100

49

50

2 ml I.

50

..“_

ml J q9ml J,amIL j0 ml Ii 49 ml Ii, 2 ml L

ml H, I ml I. Zig 1 jg I,rmiN

.@

j0 ml H

~9 ml E, 2 ml I,

49 ml D. j0 ml E

ml D

50

49

50 49

,-_,..

._-.--

X.j t.;ij

3

I.ij

3-75

-

0.00 O.lj 0.00 0.00

0.61 0.6) 0.11 0.00

0.61

0.00 0.00 0.60

2 2 2.j 3

O.&i 0.62 0.05

o-73 0.32 a.tir 0.54

3

3 I 2

^

-._._~-”

0.00 0.32 0.00 0.M

0.7s 0.16 0.10

0.73

0.00 0.00 0.Q 031

OS! 0.;; 0.00 0.00 O.jO

O.=J O.Oj 0.18 O‘.$

0.Sg 0.00 0.7; 0.7'

0.Q 0.00 o.tio

-,--

049

-

-._-

0.95

o.sj o.sq I.00

0.7-r

O.jS 0.2j

0.79

I .oo 0.96 o.gtt

o-95

0.q 0.97 0.00 0.90

0.90

0.7; 0.3;

Hrro,

.. .

.._ _ __._.._._.-..-_

-_-

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14

O.&J 0.41 O.lf 0.00

---

-_-..--._--

0.00

0.00 --

0.00 0.00 0.00

O.jb 0.00

0.2s

0.00

O&l

0.00

0.89 O.jl

0.00

0.00

O.Oj

0.36

0.00

0.b.f

0.61 0.0s

0.22

a.07

0.00

O..?j

O.ff

o.Gt

0.95

0.Z.j

o.yo

0.70

0.00

0.35

0.00

o.og

0.00

O.JO

0.2” I

0.q Oh.1

0.i-l O.jS

0.43

0.00

0.12

0.73 O.fZ O.@

O.jS OA 0.67

O.Sj

OS9 0.33

UFW

0.00 0.00

O-35 0.00 O.?L

O.tiI

O.b3 o-35

0.2 1

0.70

1Zrccr .__-._ _..- .-.

.- ._.___ -___

1.00 O.()b

,- -_

lip --. _-__

. _-.._.~__

0.S3 0.45

P&r .-_ ..- ._ ._- --_. lk*) HHiJ . .._ _. . .-. ._. _ _..._ .

Diffusion

4.5 5

2

2.5

.?

3 * 2.3

fh) --.__.

._I_...._._.___ - _..._-_

.-_ ofrun

Tinrr

_..___.______-

I{, 2 ml I. C 49 ml C, 2 ml I.

49 ml j0 mt

j0 ml B

50

50 39

49

50

rrtl .f added ___- t. ._--

IS 19 20

13 14 I’3 I6

10 11 I1

9

ii

6

5

A-0.

--._-__

.._-__

Solrent

-__

chloroform, 12 = methanol. C = ethanol, D = ?-propanol, E = butanol, F = amyl alcohol, G = acetone. H = .?-butanone, I = ph~w4 J = methyl acetate, K = ethyl acetate, 1. = concentrated nitric acid, 11 = glacial acetic acid)

--__._.._-

(;I

i?Fb+ALt!ESFORISDX\'IDt-.\tChftOSSIS DIFFEREST SOLi’ESTS

3x2

SHORT

chloroform In

facilitutcs

gcmc’rd,

clecrc;Lscd ngrees

the

movement

wit11 solvent

mixtures

with

with

increase

earlier

um( I) migratd

in the

and

sliglitly

of ioIlS.

separntion

containing

molecular

*“*7. In

findings*

only

COMJIUNICATIOSS

alcohols

weight

ihc

of the

I


alcohol

;L chloroform-hutanol

; in a chloroform

- amyl

:~lcohol

of all

added

the

(‘L’itblc

system,

silver

system,

only

ions

I) ; this

and

thalli-

incrcury(

I I)

migrated. ‘I’hc

kctonic

systems

gz~ve

pl1cnol-chloroform

system

iron,

cobalt,

and

only

mcrcury(I1)

The

nickel

usccl ‘I’lic

of

by

many

in I)rcscnt

work

prcscncc

of

wl1crc lead

(

in acidic

I~lctllyl

:lcctzLtc.

tlic

it sc’cmS

Tllc

(except silver 0.

.]unc

could

bc

tllc

ions

studictl,

(contr:iry

to

containing

wlierc~zls

its effect

esters

rcfs.

with

the

with

the

chloroform,

separation

1963)

nitric

CilSC! of

usictl,

ncitl

tcntlcricics

it 1i;icl little tllc

liighcr).

on

I) were

tllc

h:is l,ccn

but

;LS tllc

\V;LS prcfcrrcd of

cffcct

tllc: ions

lligllcst

of

‘I’llc

scclucncc

of

ions here.

1.1nly for

\*alucs,

I\‘,.*

or

it dc-

the: 4 ions

cl~loroforrn-.L-l,utanonc

CiLSCS (solvents

SyStctll,

RF* \‘illUC!S \V;LS

2, 3, I I zind 13) tllc

rncrciiry

ant1

vducs

for

clcvclopccl

quite

Scpnrations solvents

;lny 8)

3 of the

close of

cac:h

above

togctlicr

to eucll

three

contzlining

wit11 solvents

4 mctds

from

otlicr

wcrc

satis-

illltl nlctll:tllc~l, I~Ilti~nOl, zicctonc

chloroform

scverd

of the

chloriclcs. niign~tion

silver

ohtnincd. of

cliromatogr;iI’hy

is normall_v

same.

the

7 :ind

in inorg:anic acid

little

a

In some lcncl,

with

sepriltions

Irtli,

WilS

Hg.

tliallium

plishcd.

(Rcceivcd

tlic:

use

for mcrcury(1

cont;iining

obtained

the

iii

IlCilrl~

illlcl

c.g.,

the c;iscs

I\‘,.* vil!ucS

of tliallium,

(SW,

thnt

nioclificcl in otlicr

for

Scvcral

literature

acid

Lcatl

1~

chloroform.

hncl insoluble

solvents

results

of ;tn acid

mostly

wcrc

scpz1rntions

coulcl

all

for

In systcnls

7, Hydrochloric

systems

thallium(I)

clUnlitiltiVc

presence

1% -=C Ag

filCtOl_y

c1tllcr

set’).

workers

I).

I\‘,.* vnluc Tl

:ind

‘1’1~

(Tnblc

solvent

tllc

gcncrdly

the

Syh!IllS;

them

in rill tile

copper

nitric

~!l!O~~~fO~Ill--~St~~

crci1Sed

migrntion

to 1~ of little

migriltctl.

clcsiral~ility

cmphasised

good

provccl

of

mctnls

:~lcol~ols

mc:t;ils not

the

other

have

or

lirls not

previously

Only

from

CilCll

ketones

been

contziining

or

So tllnt

with

reprtecl

chloroform, been

in but

accom-