Pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome

Pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome

    Pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome Emma McCracken, Monica Monaghan, Shiva Sreenivasan PII: DOI: Reference: S0738-081X(17)3015...

366KB Sizes 165 Downloads 240 Views

    Pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome Emma McCracken, Monica Monaghan, Shiva Sreenivasan PII: DOI: Reference:

S0738-081X(17)30158-X doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2017.09.004 CID 7182

To appear in:

Clinics in Dermatology

Please cite this article as: McCracken Emma, Monaghan Monica, Sreenivasan Shiva, Pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome, Clinics in Dermatology (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2017.09.004

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome

RI PT

Emma McCracken MRCP(UK) Consultant in Diabetes and Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, South West Acute Hospital, Enniskillen, County Fermanagh BT74 6DN, United

SC

Kingdom.

NU

Monica Monaghan MBBCh BAO BSc PhD MRCP

MA

Consultant Cardiologist, Division of Cardiology, South West Acute Hospital,

PT ED

Enniskillen, County Fermanagh BT74 6DN, United Kingdom.

Shiva Sreenivasan FRCP Edin FRCP Consultant in Acute and General Medicine, Department of Medicine, South

Kingdom

CE

West Acute Hospital, Enniskillen, County Fermanagh BT74 6DN, United

AC

Honorary Lecturer, School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University, Belfast BT7 1NN, United Kingdom.

Corresponding author Name:

Shiva Sreenivasan

Address:

Department of Medicine, South West Acute Hospital, Enniskillen, County Fermanagh BT 74 6DN, United Kingdom

Email:

[email protected]

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abstract

RI PT

The metabolic syndrome (MetS) – otherwise called Syndrome X, Insulin Resistance Syndrome, Reaven’s Syndrome, and “the deadly quartet” – is the name given to the aggregate of clinical conditions

SC

comprising central/abdominal obesity, systemic hypertension, insulin resistance (or type 2 diabetes mellitus), and atherogenic dyslipidemia.

NU

It is a prothrombotic and proinflammatory state characterized by

MA

increased inflammatory cytokine activity. In addition to inflammatory dermatoses, such as psoriasis, lichen planus, and hidradenitis

PT ED

suppurativa, MetS is also commonly associated with accelerated atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, hyperuricemia/gout, chronic kidney disease, and obstructive sleep apnea. Current therapeutic options for MetS are limited to individual treatments for hypertension,

CE

hyperglycemia, and hypertriglyceridemia, as well as dietary control

AC

measures and regular exercise.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

RI PT

Introduction

The metabolic syndrome (MetS) – also called Syndrome X, Reaven’s Syndrome, “the deadly quartet”, and Insulin Resistance Syndrome – was

SC

originally described by Reaven in 1988 [1], and refers to the commonlyoccurring disorder comprising central obesity, systemic hypertension, insulin

NU

resistance, atherogenic dyslipidemia (specifically hypertriglyceridemia and

MA

reduced levels of high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol). It is associated with accelerated atherosclerosis in response to chronic inflammation and

PT ED

vascular endothelial dysfunction and confers significantly increased cardiovascular risk. MetS is implicated in both dermatologic, as well as nondermatologic pathologic conditions. We have reviewed the definition, epidemiology, and commonly-attributed postulated pathophysiologic

AC

CE

mechanisms of MetS.

Definition

MetS has been subjected to numerous definitions since its original description. This makes comparisons difficult between separate studies that use different criteria, especially when comparing populations with varying definitions of abdominal obesity. Diagnostic criteria have been sequentially developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Group for Study of Insulin Resistance (EGIR), and the National Cholesterol Education

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III). [2] [3] [4] These were subsequently modified by the American Association of Clinical

RI PT

Endocrinologists (AACE), the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention, and the American Heart Association (AHA) in collaboration with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

SC

(NHLBI). [5] [6] [7] In 2009, a harmonized consensus definition was agreed upon by the IDF, NHLBI, AHA, World Heart Federation, International

NU

Atherosclerosis Society, and the International Association for the Study of

MA

Obesity. [8] The previous various historic, as well as the more recent

Epidemiology

PT ED

diagnostic MetS criteria, are listed in Table 1.

CE

The global prevalence of MetS differs depending on geographic and socio-

AC

demographic factors, as well as the diagnostic criteria used. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data estimate that 35% of adults in the United States, and as much as 50% of the over-60 population, carry a diagnosis of MetS (30.3% in men and 35.6% in women), based on the NCEP ATP III criteria, with recent trends suggesting a stable overall prevalence, and a reduced prevalence in women. [9] Mexican-American women have been reported as having the highest MetS prevalence. [10] European MetS prevalence, using IDF diagnostic criteria, has been estimated as 41% in men, and 38% in women. [11] A systematic review of epidemiologic data from the Middle East reports a prevalence of MetS in men of 20.7 - 37.2%, and 32.1 -

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 42.7% in women (using ATP III criteria). [12] Data from China suggest a 58.1% prevalence in the 60 and over age group. [13]

RI PT

The conditions listed below have all been described as risk factors for the development of MetS: ● Positive family history [14]

SC

● Smoking [15]

● Obesity [16]

MA

● Low socioeconomic status [16]

NU

● Increasing age [16]

● Mexican-American ethnicity [16] ● Postmenopausal status [16]

PT ED

● Physical inactivity [17]

● Sugary drink and soft-drink consumption [18] [19] ● Excessive alcohol consumption [20]

CE

● Western dietary patterns [21]

AC

● Low cardiorespiratory fitness [22] ● Excessive television-watching [23] ● Use of antiretroviral drugs in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection [24] ● Atypical antipsychotic drug use (e.g., clozapine) [25]

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

RI PT

Proposed pathophysiologic mechanisms of the metabolic syndrome.

There are several hypothesized mechanisms for the underlying

pathophysiology of MetS, and the most widely accepted of these is insulin

SC

resistance with fatty acid flux. Other potential mechanisms include low-grade

NU

chronic inflammation and oxidative stress. [1] [26] [27]

MA

Insulin

The polypeptide hormone insulin is secreted by the beta cells of the

PT ED

pancreatic islet of Langerhans and acts via glycoprotein receptors located in the main target tissues of the liver, skeletal muscle, and adipocytes. The insulin receptor is a dimer of two alpha-subunits which host the binding sites for insulin, and two beta-subunits, which traverse the cell membrane. Insulin

CE

binds to the extracellular alpha-subunit of the insulin receptor, transmitting a

AC

signal across the plasma membrane and activating the tyrosine kinase domain of the intracellular beta-subunit, resulting in intermolecular autophosphorylation reactions of tyrosine residues on the receptor substrate, allowing progression to full kinase activity. The catalytic subunit of one such lipid kinase, namely PI3-kinase, triggers a sequence of further phosphorylation reactions.

A key downstream effector of this process is protein kinase B, also known as Akt. Akt is activated by protein kinase 3-phosphoinositide dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1), in combination with another currently unidentified kinase,

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT provisionally named PKD2. Activated Akt will ultimately phosphorylate and inactivate glycogen synthase kinase 3, allowing glycogen synthesis and

RI PT

promoting glucose storage as glycogen. [27] [28] [29] This is not the only role of Akt. Protein kinase A (PKA) is the main effector of lipolysis in adipose tissue. Activation of Akt also results in inhibition of PKA, and thus lipolysis

SC

suppression. [30]

MA

NU

Figure 1

Insulin-dependent glucose cellular uptake is stimulated by inducing migration

PT ED

of the glucose transporter protein GLUT4 to the cell surface, promoting glucose transport into the cell. Glucose is then phosphorylated to be either stored as glycogen or metabolized to produce adenosine triphosphate (ATP). GLUT4 is highly expressed in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. In

CE

the fasting state, when insulin levels are reduced, GLUT4 is reduced at the

AC

plasma membrane and is instead relocated to intracellular membrane storage compartments. Overexpression of active mutants of PI3-kinase and AKT can promote expression of GLUT4 on the cell surface in the absence of insulin. [27] [28] [29] [30] [31]

Insulin inhibits gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis, together with promoting glucose storage, and it also stimulates genetic transcription of enzymes involved in glycolytic and fatty acid synthetic pathways. It directly inhibits transcription and activity of hepatic gluconeogenic enzymes, achieving this through Akt-mediated phosphorylation of the forkhead box class O-1 (FOXO1)

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT transcription factor. Other transcriptional regulators have also been associated with inhibition of gluconeogenesis; these include cAMP response

RI PT

element-binding protein (CREB)-regulated transcription coactivator 2, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1-α (PGC-1α) and

SC

FOXO6. [32] [33] [34] [35]

Insulin resistance

NU

As previously stated, the most widely accepted hypothesis for the underlying

MA

pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome is that of insulin resistance, driven to a degree by fatty acid excess as a consequence of inappropriate lipolysis.

PT ED

Reduced responsiveness to normal insulin levels is an obvious precursor to the development of type 2 diabetes. Early in the process, beta cells secrete increased amounts of insulin as a compensatory mechanism to maintain

CE

euglycemia. Eventually decompensation will occur.

AC

Considering the main tissues targeted by insulin, insulin resistance in skeletal muscle results in a reduction in glycogen synthesis and glucose transport, while insulin resistance in the liver appears to lead to reduced effectiveness of insulin signalling pathways; however, discordant to this observation is evidence that hepatic lipogenesis continues. Precise mechanisms have not been definitively confirmed, and research in this area continues. [26] [32]

Lipid accumulation in skeletal muscle is associated with reduced tyrosine phosphorylation, inhibiting subsequent activation of PI3 kinase. Again, a specific pathway has not yet been identified; a number of serine kinases and

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT inflammatory intermediates could be responsible for this effect. In addition, raised levels of acyl-CoAs or acyl-CoA derivatives can reduce Akt activation.

RI PT

Lipid accumulation itself may be a consequence of increased fatty acid delivery to tissues ,where energy intake outstrips storage capacity.

SC

An alternative hypothesis is that of mitochondrial dysfunction, namely a defect in the process of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. [26] [27] [32]

NU

In skeletal muscle, free fatty acids can inhibit insulin dependent glucose

MA

uptake. In the liver, free fatty acids promote increased production of glucose, triglycerides and apo B-containing triglyceride-rich very low-density

PT ED

lipoproteins (VLDL), which are atherogenic.

Free fatty acids are mainly derived from triglyceride stores in adipose tissue, released via action of cyclic AMP during lipolysis. During periods of fasting,

CE

this process is initiated by catecholamines. Post-prandially, this process is

AC

inhibited by insulin via a proposed mechanism of reducing cAMP activity. In the setting of insulin resistance,where the effects of insulin are reduced, the rate of lipolysis will increase, resulting in increased fatty acid production. This will potentiate the negative cycle of inhibiting the antilipolytic properties of insulin, leading to further lipolysis. [26] [30] [36] [37]

Inflammatory and oxidative mediators The development of MetS is not fully understood, but central obesity and insulin resistance are implicated in its etiology. The condition confers significantly increased risk for type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT cardiovascular disease. [38] MetS is recognized to be a proinflammatory and prothrombotic state [4] [7], with adipose tissue being central to its

RI PT

pathophysiology. [39]

Adipose tissue is now considered a biologically active endocrine and

SC

paracrine organ. [40] Adipocytes undergo hypertrophy and hyperplasia in response to nutritional excess that can lead the cells to outgrow their blood

NU

supply with induction of a hypoxic state. [41] [42] Hypoxia can lead to cell

MA

necrosis with macrophage infiltration and the production of adipocytokines, which include the proinflammatory mediators interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor

PT ED

necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), as well as the prothrombotic mediator plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1). [40] [43]

CE

Figure 2

AC

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a potent inflammatory cytokine that plays a vital role in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. [44] [45] Elevated IL-6 levels have been measured in adipose tissue of patients with diabetes mellitus and obesity, and also notably in patients with features of MetS. Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated increased IL-6 concentrations in association with hypertension, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular events. [45] [46] In a murine model, chronic IL-6 exposure led to insulin resistance with hyperglycemia. [47] TNF-α, a proinflammatory cytokine named after its antitumor activity, is a significant mediator of numerous cardiovascular pathologies, including

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT atherosclerosis and heart failure. [48] It has been reported to act as a paracrine mediator to reduce insulin resistance in adipocytes. [40] [43]

RI PT

PAI-1 is a serine protease inhibitor and acts to inhibit tissue plasminogen activator and is prothrombotic. Circulating PAI-1 is increased in obese MetS subjects, as well as in patients with type 2 diabetes, and there is a positive

SC

correlation between the severity of the MetS and the plasma concentration of PAI-1. [49] The mechanism of PAI-1 overexpression in MetS likely involves

NU

multiple mediators and the mechanism as yet remains unknown. Interestingly,

MA

the Alessi group has postulated that in addition to its role in atherothrombosis, PAI-1 is also involved in adipose tissue development and control of insulin

PT ED

signaling. [49]

The mechanism by which adipocyte dysregulation occurs is not clearly understood, but a role for obesity induced oxidative stress is postulated. In human and animal studies there has been a positive correlation between fat

CE

accumulation and oxidative stress, with production of reactive oxygen species

AC

and increased expression of NADPH oxidase with concomitant decreased expression of antioxidant enzymes. In vitro studies showed that cultured adipocytes with increased levels of fatty acids exhibited increased oxidative stress via the NADPH pathway. [50] In addition, obese mice treated with NADPH oxidase inhibitor showed reduced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production with improvement in the diabetes phenotype. Markers of prooxidant state that include oxidized LDL (OxLDL) and uric acid are elevated in MetS. [51] Expression of the anti-infammatory cytokine adiponectin was shown to be decreased in MetS. Apiponectin is secreted from adipocytes and functions in

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT insulin sensitization, anti-atherogenesis and vasodilatation, [51] and levels are negatively correlated with fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels, waist

RI PT

circumference and visceral fat. [39] Adiponectin inhibits the pro-atherogenic molecular pathways that include monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells by the expression of adhesion molecules, oxidized LDL uptake of macrophages

SC

through scavenger receptors, and proliferation of migrated smooth muscle

NU

cells by the action of platelet-derived growth factors. [52] Studies have indicated a significant elevation in the expression of OxLDL in

MA

MetS, in insulin resistance and in adiposity. [51] OxLDL is one product of lipid oxidation. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are also generated. Antioxidant

PT ED

cytokines that include Adiponectin are downregulated in MetS allowing OxLDL and ROS to activate an oxidative cascade that leads to apoptosis and cellular damage. [53] When the integrity of the endothelial cell is breached, a cascade

CE

is initiated that terminates in atherosclerosis.

AC

While the role of adipose tissue and the molecular pathways involved in MetS pathophysiology remain in the experimental phase, new molecular targets may be uncovered to develop therapeutic strategies to improve cardiovascular outcomes.

Conclusions MetS is an increasingly international common cause of morbidity and mortality, and has been linked with many risk factors as well as numerous postulated pathophysiological mechanisms. The most commonly described

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT mechanisms result in insulin resistance, together with a low-grade pro-

RI PT

inflammatory, pro-thrombotic, and oxidative physiologic state.

References

SC

1. Reaven GM. Banting lecture 1988. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes 1988; 37: 1595-1607.

NU

2. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of

MA

diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO

PT ED

consultation. Diabet Med 1998; 15: 539-553. 3. Balkau B, Charles MA. Comment on the provisional report from the WHO consultation. European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance (EGIR). Diabet Med 1999; 16: 442-443.

CE

4. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol

AC

Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001; 285: 2486-2497.

5. Einhorn D, Reaven GM, Cobin RH, et al. American College of Endocrinology position statement on the insulin resistance syndrome. Endocr Pract 2003; 9: 237-352. 6. Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J. The metabolic syndrome--a new worldwide definition. Lancet 2005; 366: 1059-1062. 7. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, Gordon DJ, Krauss RM, Savage PA, Smith SC, Spertus JA, Costa

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT F. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

RI PT

Scientific Statement. Circulation 2005; 112: 2735-27352. 8. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, Fruchart JC, James PT, Loria CM, Smith SC. Harmonizing the

SC

metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention;

NU

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association;

MA

World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation 2009;

PT ED

120:16401645.

9. Aguilar M, Bhuket T, Torres S, Liu B, Wong RJ. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the United States, 2003-2012. JAMA 2015; 313: 1973-1974.

CE

10. Beltrán-Sánchez H, Harhay MO, Harhay MM, McElligott S. Prevalence

AC

and trends of metabolic syndrome in the adult U.S. population, 19992010. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 697-703.

11. Gao W. Does the constellation of risk factors with and without abdominal adiposity associate with different cardiovascular mortality risk? Int J Obes (Lond). 2008; 32: 757-762. 12. Mabry RM, Reeves MM, Eakin EG, Owen N. Gender differences in prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: a systematic review. Diabet Med 2010; 27: 593-597.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 13. Liu M, Wang J, Jiang B, Sun D, Wu L, Yang S, Wang Y, Li X, He Y. Increasing Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in a Chinese Elderly

RI PT

Population: 2001-2010. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e66233. 14. Lipińska A, Koczaj-Bremer M, Jankowski K, Kaźmierczak A, Ciurzyński M, Ou-Pokrzewińska A, Mikocka E, Lewandowski Z, Demkow U,

SC

Pruszczyk P. Does family history of metabolic syndrome affect the

Metab Syndr 2014; 6: 75.

NU

metabolic profile phenotype in young healthy individuals? Diabetol

MA

15. Sun K, Liu J, Ning G. Active smoking and risk of metabolic syndrome: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e47791.

PT ED

16. Park YW, Zhu S, Palaniappan L, Heshka S, Carnethon MR, Heymsfield SB. The metabolic syndrome: prevalence and associated risk factor findings in the US population from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163:

CE

427-436.

AC

17. Gennuso KP, Gangnon RE, Thraen-Borowski KM, Colbert LH. Doseresponse relationships between sedentary behaviour and the metabolic syndrome and its components. Diabetologia 2015; 58: 485-492.

18. Dhingra R, Sullivan L, Jacques PF, et al. Soft drink consumption and risk of developing cardiometabolic risk factors and the metabolic syndrome in middle-aged adults in the community. Circulation 2007; 116: 480-488. 19. Green AK, Jacques PF, Rogers G, Fox CS, Meigs JB, McKeown NM. Sugar-sweetened beverages and prevalence of the metabolically

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT abnormal phenotype in the Framingham Heart Study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2014; 22: e157-163.

RI PT

20. Fan AZ, Russell M, Naimi T, Li Y, Liao Y, Jiles R, Mokdad AH. Patterns of alcohol consumption and the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93: 3833-3838.

SC

21. Lutsey PL, Steffen LM, Stevens J. Dietary intake and the development of the metabolic syndrome: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities

NU

study. Circulation 2008; 117: 754-761.

MA

22. LaMonte MJ, Barlow CE, Jurca R, Kampert JB, Church TS, Blair SN. Cardiorespiratory fitness is inversely associated with the incidence of metabolic syndrome: a prospective study of men and women.

PT ED

Circulation 2005; 112: 505-512. 23. Chang PC, Li TC, Wu MT, Liu CS, Li CI, Chen CC, Lin WY, Yang SY, Lin CC. Association between television viewing and the risk of

CE

metabolic syndrome in a community-based population. BMC Public

AC

Health 2008; 8: 193. 24. Freitas P, Carvalho D, Souto S, Santos AC, Xerinda S, Marques R, Martinez E, Sarmento A, Medina JL. Impact of Lipodystrophy on the prevalence and components of metabolic syndrome in HIV-infected patients. BMC Infect Dis 2011; 11: 246. 25. Lamberti JS, Olson D, Crilly JF, Olivares T, Williams GC, Tu X, Tang W, Wiener K, Dvorin S, Dietz MB. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among patients receiving clozapine. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163: 1273-1276.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 26. Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ. The metabolic syndrome. Lancet 2005; 365: 1415–1428

RI PT

27. Roberts CK, Hevener AL, Barnard RJ. Metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance: underlying causes and modification by exercise training. Compr Physiol 2013; 3: 1-58.

SC

28. Saltiel AR, Kahn CR. Insulin signalling and the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism. Nature 2001; 414: 799-806

NU

29. Lizcano JM, Alessi DR. The insulin signalling pathway. Curr Biol 2002;

MA

12: R236-8.

30. Choi SM, Tucker DF, Gross DN, Easton RM, DiPilato LM, Dean AS,

Monks BR, Birnbaum MJ. Insulin Regulates Adipocyte Lipolysis via an

PT ED

Akt-Independent Signaling Pathway. Mol Cell Biol 2010; 30: 5009– 5020

31. Bryant NJ, Govers R, James DE. Regulated transport of the glucose

CE

transporter GLUT4. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002; 3: 267-277

AC

32. Savage DB, Petersen KF, Shulman GI. Disordered lipid metabolism and the pathogenesis of insulin resistance. Physiol Rev 2007; 87: 507520.

33. Kim DH, Perdomo G, Zhang T, Slusher S, Lee S, Phillips BE, Fan Y, Giannoukakis N, Gramignoli R, Strom S, Ringquist S, Dong HH. FoxO6 integrates insulin signaling with gluconeogenesis in the liver. Diabetes 2011; 60: 2763-2774. 34. Dentin R, Liu Y, Koo SH, Hedrick S, Vargas T, Heredia J, Yates J 3rd, Montminy M. Insulin modulates gluconeogenesis by inhibition of the coactivator TORC2. Nature 2007; 449:366-369.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 35. Li X, Monks B, Ge Q, Birnbaum MJ. Akt/PKB regulates hepatic metabolism by directly inhibiting PGC-1alpha transcription coactivator.

RI PT

Nature 2007; 447: 1012–1016. 36. DeFronzo RA, Ferrannini E. Insulin resistance. A multifaceted syndrome responsible for NIDDM, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia,

SC

and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Care 1991; 14: 173-194.

NU

37. Jensen MD, Caruso M, Heiling V, Miles JM. Insulin regulation of

MA

lipolysis in nondiabetic and IDDM subjects. Diabetes 1989; 38: 15951601.

PT ED

38. Ford ES. The metabolic syndrome and mortality from cardiovascular disease and all-causes: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey II Mortality Study. Atherosclerosis 2004; 173: 309314.

CE

39. Ryo M, Nakamura T, Kihara S, et al. Adiponectin as a biomarker of the

AC

metabolic syndrome. Circ J 2004; 68: 975-981. 40. Lau DC, Dhillon B, Yan H, Szmitko PE, Verma S. Adipokines: molecular links between obesity and atheroslcerosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2005; 288: H2031-H2041. 41. Halberg N, Wernstedt-Asterholm I, Scherer PE. The adipocyte as an endocrine cell. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2008; 37: 753-768, xxi. 42. Cinti S, Mitchell G, Barbatelli G, Murano I, Ceresi E, Faloia E, Wang S, Fortier M, Greenberg AS, Obin MS. Adipocyte death defines

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT macrophage localization and function in adipose tissue of obese mice and humans. J Lipid Res 2005; 46: 2347-2355.

RI PT

43. Kaur J. A comprehensive review on metabolic syndrome. Cardiol Res Pract 2014; 2014: 943162.

44. Testa R, Olivieri F, Bonfigli AR, Sirolla C, Boemi M, Marchegiani F,

SC

Marra M, Cenerelli S, Antonicelli R, Dolci A, Paolisso G, Franceschi C. Interleukin-6-174 G > C polymorphism affects the association between

NU

IL-6 plasma levels and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients.

MA

Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2006; 71: 299-305. 45. Bao P, Liu G, Wei Y. Association between IL-6 and related risk factors of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease in young rats. Int J

PT ED

Clin Exp Med 2015; 8: 13491-134919. 46. Bernberg E, Ulleryd MA, Johansson ME, Bergström GM. Social disruption stress increases IL-6 levels and accelerates atherosclerosis

CE

in ApoE-/- mice. Atherosclerosis 2012; 221: 359-365.

AC

47. Kim YD, Kim YH, Cho YM, et al. Metformin ameliorates IL-6-induced hepatic insulin resistance via induction of orphan nuclear receptor small heterodimer partner (SHP) in mouse models. Diabetologia 2012; 55: 1482-1494. 48. Azzawi M, Hasleton P. Tumour necrosis factor alpha and the cardiovascular system: its role in cardiac allograft rejection and heart disease. Cardiovasc Res 1999; 43: 850-859. 49. Alessi MC, Juhan-Vague I. PAI-1 and the metabolic syndrome: links, causes, and consequences. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2006; 26: 2200-2207.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 50. Furukawa S, Fujita T, Shimabukuro M, Iwaki M, Yamada Y, Nakajima Y, Nakayama O, Makishima M, Matsuda M, Shimomura I. Increased

RI PT

oxidative stress in obesity and its impact on metabolic syndrome. J Clin Invest 2004;114:1752-1761.

51. Srikanthan K, Feyh A, Visweshwar H, Shapiro JI, Sodhi K. Systematic

SC

Review of Metabolic Syndrome Biomarkers: A Panel for Early Detection, Management, and Risk Stratification in the West Virginian

NU

Population. Int J Med Sci 2016;13:25-38.

MA

52. Matsuzawa Y, Funahashi T, Kihara S, Shimomura I. Adiponectin and metabolic syndrome. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004;24:29-33.

PT ED

53. Landar A, Zmijewski JW, Dickinson DA, Le Goffe C, Johnson MS, Milne GL, Zanoni G, Vidari G, Morrow JD, Darsley-Usmar VM. Interaction of electrophilic lipid oxidation products with mitochondria in endothelial cells and formation of reactive oxygen species. Am J

AC

CE

Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006;290:H1777-H17787.