- Email: [email protected]
Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery
OHKUBO ET AL
THE JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
2. Babbush CA. Provisional implants: surgical and prosthetic aspects. Implant Dent 2001;10:113-20. 3. Simon H. Use of transitional implants to support a surgical guide: enhancing the accuracy of implant placement. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:229-32.
YOKOHAMA, 230-8501 JAPAN FAX: 81-45-573-9599 E-MAIL: [email protected]
Reprint requests to: DR CHIKAHIRO OHKUBO DEPARTMENT OF REMOVABLE PROSTHODONTICS TSURUMI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE 2-1-3 TSURUMI TSURUMI-KU
0022-3913/$30.00 Copyright © 2004 by The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
Noteworthy Abstracts of the Current Literature
doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.11.007
Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery Thomason JM, Lund JP, Chehade A, Feine JS. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:467-73.
Purpose.This study examined patient satisfaction with conventional complete dentures and mandibular implant overdentures opposing conventional maxillary dentures 6 months after delivery. Materials and Methods. Sixty edentulous subjects (aged 65 to 75 years) were randomly assigned to either a mandibular conventional denture or an overdenture supported by two implants with ball-shaped retentive anchors. Patients rated their general satisfaction and other features of their prostheses, together with their ability to eat certain food items, on 100-mm visual analogue scales before assignment, and after 2 and 6 months. Results. Both treatment groups reported greater satisfaction with their new prostheses at 6 months. General satisfaction ratings were higher in the implant group than in the conventional denture group by approximately 36% (mean difference 22.3 mm). The implant group also rated comfort (mean difference 22.4 mm), stability (mean difference 28.5 mm), and ability to chew (mean difference 17.3 mm) significantly higher. Significantly higher scores were also given by the implant group for their ability to chew certain hard foods. A trend for an increase in the differences between the groups, in favor of the implant group, was observed between the 2- and 6-month recalls, although the increase was only significant for ease of cleaning. The primary influence on general satisfaction 6 months after the delivery of the prostheses was the provision of the twoimplant overdenture. Conclusion. Edentulous seniors who received mandibular implant overdentures opposing a conventional denture rated their general satisfaction approximately 36% higher than did a comparable group provided with new conventional dentures.—Reprinted with permission of Quintessence Publishing.
FEBRUARY 2004
197
THE JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
2. Babbush CA. Provisional implants: surgical and prosthetic aspects. Implant Dent 2001;10:113-20. 3. Simon H. Use of transitional implants to support a surgical guide: enhancing the accuracy of implant placement. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:229-32.
YOKOHAMA, 230-8501 JAPAN FAX: 81-45-573-9599 E-MAIL: [email protected]
Reprint requests to: DR CHIKAHIRO OHKUBO DEPARTMENT OF REMOVABLE PROSTHODONTICS TSURUMI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE 2-1-3 TSURUMI TSURUMI-KU
0022-3913/$30.00 Copyright © 2004 by The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
Noteworthy Abstracts of the Current Literature
doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.11.007
Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery Thomason JM, Lund JP, Chehade A, Feine JS. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:467-73.
Purpose.This study examined patient satisfaction with conventional complete dentures and mandibular implant overdentures opposing conventional maxillary dentures 6 months after delivery. Materials and Methods. Sixty edentulous subjects (aged 65 to 75 years) were randomly assigned to either a mandibular conventional denture or an overdenture supported by two implants with ball-shaped retentive anchors. Patients rated their general satisfaction and other features of their prostheses, together with their ability to eat certain food items, on 100-mm visual analogue scales before assignment, and after 2 and 6 months. Results. Both treatment groups reported greater satisfaction with their new prostheses at 6 months. General satisfaction ratings were higher in the implant group than in the conventional denture group by approximately 36% (mean difference 22.3 mm). The implant group also rated comfort (mean difference 22.4 mm), stability (mean difference 28.5 mm), and ability to chew (mean difference 17.3 mm) significantly higher. Significantly higher scores were also given by the implant group for their ability to chew certain hard foods. A trend for an increase in the differences between the groups, in favor of the implant group, was observed between the 2- and 6-month recalls, although the increase was only significant for ease of cleaning. The primary influence on general satisfaction 6 months after the delivery of the prostheses was the provision of the twoimplant overdenture. Conclusion. Edentulous seniors who received mandibular implant overdentures opposing a conventional denture rated their general satisfaction approximately 36% higher than did a comparable group provided with new conventional dentures.—Reprinted with permission of Quintessence Publishing.
FEBRUARY 2004
197