Physicn B 17Y (1992)
PHYSICA I
IY-23
North-Holland
Peculiarities paramagnetic
of magnetic garnets
linear
N.P. Kolmakova and A.I. Popov MoscowImtirutr of Electronic 7’echnics. Moscow Received
25 February
hlanuscript
received
The magnetic taking
experimental
of rare-earth
30_339#, Kussiu
lYY1 in final form 25 November
linear birefringence
into account
birefringence
(MLB)
the splittings of excited
data. Agreement
1YYl
for paramagnetic configurations
rare-earth 4fh
(RE)
garnets with RE from Tb to Yh ia analyzed
’M(g).
is found for all RE garnets investigated
Theoretical results are compared with available with RE ions from Th to Tm (Ho included). except
for Yh.
1. Introduction In ref. [l] the observed properties of the MLB were analyzed in the Judd-Ofelt approximation for the heavy RE garnets R,M,O,, (R= Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb; M = Al, Ga). The field and temperature dependences, the sign and anisotropy of MLB were discussed. The Judd-Ofelt approximation was found to describe the MLB data for terbium. dysprosium, erbium and thulium aluminum and gallium garnets within experimental accuracy. At the same time the sign of the MLB for holmium garnets and the sign and anisotropy of the MLB for ytterbium garnets did not coincide with experimental data. In ref. [l] the assumption was made that the opposite sign of the MLB for holmium garnets may bc ascribed to the dichroism due to the proximity of the absorption band. For ytterbium garnets it was supposed that an extension of the theory beyond the Judd-Ofelt approximation and consideration of splittings of excited configurations should allow one to describe correctly the observed properties of the MLB. In this work we consider the influence of the extension of the theory beyond the Judd-Ofelt approximation on the MLB of RE paramagnetic (gallium and aluminum) garnets with RE from Tb to Yb.
2. Sign of MLB The main contribution of the MLB in RE garnets is given apparently by the parity-allowed electric-dipole transitions between thermally populated levels of the ground 4fN configuration and the The quantitative interpretation of the MLB needs levels of excited 4fjVm’5d and 4fNm’ 5g configurations. information on the energy levels and wave functions of all configurations. The electronic structure of is formed by numerous interactions, many of which are comparable in the 4f”-’ 5d(g) configuration of the magnitude (e.g., the Coulomb interaction of the 5d electron with a 4f”-’ core and the interaction of states 5d electron with crystal field (CF) ( see. e.g., ref. [2]). This hampers greatly the classification Apparently in the first approximation the electronic structure of these for 4f”- ’ Sd(g)-configurations. 0021.4S26/Y2/$OS.O0
@ lYY2 - Elsevier
Science Publishers
B.V. All rights reserved
bv the concept ot tractional configurations can be treated as ;I totality of terms. which cm he obtained parentage [3]. In this case WC have as ;I rule several terms, which differ in the statch ot the CX)I-c.WC consider the wave functions of the terms in the form given in ref. 131
with respect to the pcrmutatlon5 ()I of the core 4 \,, / II, II, ;irc antisymmetric of the Sd(g)-electron (I’ _‘. 4 I: ctcctrons I. 2.. . i ~~1. i + I.. . N: V$ ,,,, J&ris the wave function Y are the Ctebsch-Gordan coefficients. The wave functions of the term\ of the grc~unci 4f’ c ”,,rr,,~ configuration are considered in the form [31 where
the wave functions
function ot lhc /th of fractional parcntagc. (Ii,,,,, :,, ia the b;i\c where GT,l\l,l , arc the coefficients electron. To consider the MLB we determine the contribution to the tensor of potarizability of the KL 1011. caused by electric-dipole transitions from the terms of the ground configuration to the tcrmx of the 3f” ‘5d(g) configurations. Using the irreducible form of the polarizabitity tcnaor 141 WC ha\c
where g and e arc indices Bottzmann factor.
dj:’ denotes
and excited
configurations.
and 0,. is the
I
the 4th component
of the electric-dipole
moment
for the ith electron
From the Wigner-Eckart theorem, formulae for sums of products and for hj-symbols. expression (3) is expressed in the form fk
respectively.
d);‘.
D<, = i
,-
of states of the ground
of the Ctebsch-Gordan
cocfficicnt\
1’’ = N,’ ( Q ),’)( I* ) ) . (J)
x 1Aa,.
‘.,.
where L, L’ and configuration and of the quadruple configuration are
, +
4
‘./.
+
(:6,:., +, i -
L, are the orbital angular momenta of the states of the ground configuration. excited the core of the excited configuration. respectively. ((I:,“(L)) is the thermal average moment in the L-representation. The coefficients A. B and (’ for the -If’ ‘5d(g) as follows:
N. p. K&n&ova. iI.1. Popov I Magneticlinearhirefringence of RE prnets
A(5d)
(L + l)(L,
= -
(2L - l)L(2L
+ L + 2)(-L,
+ L + 3)
L(L + 1) L(L, + L - 2)(L, + L - l)(L,
C(5d) = ~
(2L + l)(L 5(L + l)(L,
A(5g) = -
- L + 2)(L,
+ 1)(X
(9
+ L - 4)(L, + L - 3)(L, - L + 4)(L, - L + 5) + 1)
5(L, + L + 3)(L, + L - 3)(L, - L +4)(-L,
B(5g) = +
- L + 3)
+ 3)
12(2L - l)L(2L
+ L + 4)
12L(L + 1)
~L(L, + L + 3)(L, + L + 6)(L, - L +4)(-L,
C(5g) = -
+ L + 3)
+ 1)
(L, + L + 4)(L, + L - 2)(L, - L +3)(-L,
B(5d) = +
Using garnets
+ L + 3)(L, + L +4)(-L,
21
12(2L + l)(L
(4) we can determine
AS,, = a ,;,
TYTj:‘(
+ 1)(X
the contribution
+ L + 5)
+ 3)
of the RE ions to the dielectric
tensor
of paramagnetic
Qky > ? (6)
Here (Q&)) is the thermal average of the quadrupole moment of 4f electrons for the rth inequivalent site, T is the transformation matrix from the local to laboratory system of coordinates, N,, is the number of RE ions in the unit volume, and n is the average refractive index. The MLB, given by An = (1/2n)(Ae,, - AC_), for different orientations of the magnetic field is determined by the formula
An =
k
(AQ)
,
where (AQ) is the thermal average of the appropriate combination of the induced quadruple moments of the RE ion. To discuss the problem of MLB sign we compare the values of coefficients A, B, C for the 4f”- ‘Sd configuration which are presented in table 1 for all RE ions investigated in ref. [l]. In table 1 signs of
Table 1 Magneto-optical
parameters
Ion
Sign of MLB
Sign of
Th’Dy’Ho” Er” Tm” Yb”
+ t + ~
+ + + + + t
for RE ions. L
L,
A(5d)
B(5d)
C(5d)
A(5g)
B(5g)
C(5g)
3 5 6 6 5 3
0 3 5 6 6 5
-48 -32 -21 -12 -5 0
0 +12 t26 t34 t36 t30
0 0 -0.8 -3 -6 -10
0 PO.6 -2 -5 -8 -13
0 +11 +19 i24 t27 +27
-13 -19 -1s -II -8 -5
(I-1Q)
the
MLB
and of the
quantity
depend on the orientation First
WC should
paramagnctic cluestioncd and give The
(see, the
ground
e.g..
that
the positive
firmly
settled.
ref.
151).
sign
of
diffcrcnces
term
same
is
negative
energy
to the
note
garnets
AE,
(for
;t given
KE
ion
the sign
ot’ (-10
1 cioc4 no1
sign
ot
(Au)
have
tried
for
all
for
bea\>
RI,.
ytterbium
the C‘f- parameters.
m,liich
ions
trom
garnets.
dc~cribc
well
10 )‘I-,’
‘1%
\\herc
the
C’F
alI yectro4copic
do not exist. Ilavc found that \uch parameters ’ cm ’ ) bctwccn the terms of the cscitcd configuration.
II1
may
be
ckil;~
WI L
(-10
are hmall
(- 10’ cm
given
field).
We
to find
(IQ).
of the core.
configuration
arc also
(.IQ)
of the magnetic
in comparison
with
’ ). therefore
wc neglect
of the sign
of the MI-E.
the energy them
differences
in the first
belonging
between
them
~lpproximation.
the
and
From
tahlc
I WC WC that allowed transitions to the Iowa-lying terms. which arc characterid bv the go-ouncl term 01 the core. ~“ivc the correct signs of the MLB for garnets studied except those with i.1, “. C‘onscquc%ntl\ to explain the Ggn of the MLB fol- holmium garnets it is not ncccssary to consider influcncc ot a11 ahsorption band [I]. For ytterbium garnets the consideration of the splitting of the Jf’ ‘5~1 configut ;Ition
does
not
solve
It is known csscntial tions
the problem
that sometimes
contributions
to the
prcscnted
to the two-photon
MLB.
in
ytterbium
garnets
3. Anisotropy In ref.
the KE
/I.
(’ (SCC cqx.
of transitions
garnets
populated
the
anisotropy
the different
changes
structure).
under
This
cncrg!
of the
levels
MLB
in
of quadrupolc
consideration
of the MLB.
the known
had to be modified
For
ytterbium
The
be
MLB
configurations
Anti
not,
is
contribution observed
in
We have thus by the influence configuration tions
w,),
Here
(I, are
parameters. summation
for
‘5f contigur-ation corresponding
the
the 4f’
y\c
cc)ritribu-
‘Sg contiguration
contiguration
\o the problem
however. result
particular
dot\
not
result
drc in the
oU the Ggn of the ML13
ytterbium
of excited
and the sign
calculated
data.
tar
on the excited in comparison
to account value4
is the concept
situatccl
for
of different (e.g..
from
Tb’
of g-tensor\
tc) IX_.
directions
in the incquivalent ions
Gtes
01
) to dc\cribc
the ycctroscopic
\vholc complex
;I
that the main
Does
not
in an essential garnets.
of the
ions
for sonic’ KE
al-c conbicicred
field
data.
of cxpcrimcntal
and anisotropy
of the
MI.13
set of the C’F paramctcr4. contribution
the consideration
contribution
where
configurations
the additional
of the CF
to be small
casts
contiguration
magnetic
use of the C’F knoun
2 single
valid
-If’
(the
of RE
;I little
configuration?
in some for
garnets
making
using
how
of the ground
KE
spectroscopic
bv the ground
of the splittings anisotropy
the
simultaneousI?;
arises.
is given
excited
CF
garnets
described
question
of the
(5)) ‘3g
an opportunity
the anisotropy
ions
co~~lcl not
If’
of the 4t’
analycci
(4).
the
moments
giva
For data.
to
investigation.
quantitatively other
ha\e
of MLR
for
the garnet
,4.
to states
So wc
open.
[I] the thermally
rcsponsihlc induces
for is still
transition\
proccs\a.
and the coefficients
I. Consideration
table
of the MLB
change
the electric-dipole
the
effect
to the :lni\c)troph
of the CF
to the anisotropy i\ the
smallest
so great that it i\ the main
ylittings
(see
one‘
and
ot
of the ML.13’) ref.
[I I).
the
it can
give
the
MLB? contribution -If’ with
to the polarizability
‘5d contiguration. the distance
of the KE
C‘onsideriny
between
ion 6ct 1,
the splitting
the centro
’
GILI\C~
of the excited
ot gravity
of c,ontigur;l-
WC have for Sty-1 [h]
the
Stevens
Calculating over
the
parameters the necessary
values
of indices
for
the
ground
Clcbsch-Gordan .\ = 2. 4;
/I = 0.
multiplet
of the
coefficients t2.
t_4
If’
configuration.
and V)j-symbols
(I/II
.5): I
!I;,
the
and performing
2. 1: 7 = 0.
+ I.
(‘Ithe
a.4
N. P. Kolmakova.
A.I.
( ]T] < t), we obtain expressions for 6a when transforming to the Cartesian Further, we neglect the higher-order very small [7]. The resulting contribution to the
Sn, = where i= lo5 cm-‘), the linear taken as
Popov
I Magnetic
linear hirefringrwcr
of
RE garmvs
23
y’ in the explicit form and determine the corrections for the MLB coordinates and summing over inequivalent sites of RE ions. terms (t > 2) in formula (8) as their contribution is known to be MLB is determined
by the expression
& A,(SQ,) , (OOl), (1 lo), (1 11); a’ is the magneto-optical coefficient (a’ia - 2 x 10mh for hw,, (SQ,) is the thermal average of the appropriate combinations of quadruple components, A, combinations of parameters of the CF acting on the 4f”-‘5d configuration, which can be
(qsd = (qJ4,
(dlr’ld) (flr’lf)
(10)
.
Numerical calculations of the additional contribution 6n, to the MLB from the CF splitting of the excited configuration for all reasonable values of the CF parameters compatible with the available estimates for radial integrals, shielding parameters, etc. [8,9], give the value of 6n, not exceeding 1% of the main quantity An. Consequently, consideration of the CF splitting of the excited configuration results in inessential corrections to the MLB.
4. Conclusion Our analysis has shown that the electric-dipole transitions to the states of the 4f”-‘5d(g) configurations characterizing by the ground terms of the core allows one to account fully for the MLB in all heavy RE paramagnetic garnets (including holmium ones) except for ytterbium garnets. For ytterbium garnets we can find no other possible explanation of the properties of the MLB than the influence of excited configurations ndy4fN” (n = 3, 4), the possible importance of which has been noted, e.g., in refs. [lo, 111.
Acknowledgement We would
like to express
our thanks
to R.Z.
Levitin
for his interest
in this work
References [l] [2] [3] [4] [S] [6] [7] [8] (Y]
N.P. Kolmakova. R.Z. Levitin, A.I. Popov. N.F. Vedernikov, A.K. Zvezdin and V. Nekvasil, Phys. Rev. B 41 (1’390) 6170. M.C. Downer. C.D. Cordero-Montalvo and H. Crosswhite. Phys. Rev. B 28 (1983) 4931. 1.1. Sobel’man, Introduction to the ‘Theory of Atomic Spectra (Pergamon. Oxford, 1972). J.D. Axe, Jr.. Phys. Rev. 136 (1964) A42. V. Nekvasil, Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 1OY (1982) 67. A.S. Moskvin and V.M. Pleschev, Opt. Spectr. 64 (1988) 721 (in Russian). N.P. Kolmakova, R.Z. Levitin, V.N. Orlov and N.F. Vedernikov. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 87 (1990) 218. K. Rajnak. J. Chem. Phys. 37 (1962) 2440. C.A. Morrison and R.P. Leavitt. in: Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare-Earths, Vol. 5. eds. K.A. Gschneidner and L. Eyring (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982). 101 B.R. Judd and D.R. Pooler. J. Phys. C 15 (1982) 591. 111 P.J. Becker. Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 43 (1971) 583.