NEWS & TECHNOLOGY
Dogs and monkeys prefer good people showed no preference between accepting the reward from the struggler or the helper. But when the companion had refused to help, the monkey more often took food from the struggler. Dogs did the same. The team also investigated capuchins’ attitude to fairness. In this test, actor A requested balls from actor B, who handed over three balls. Then actor B asked for balls from actor A, and A either gave three balls back or no balls.
BE NICE – or your pooch may judge you. Both pet dogs and monkeys show a preference for people who help others, and the results might explain the origins of our sense of morality. By the age of 1, humans already start to judge others by how they interact. This has led to suggestions that children have a kind of innate morality that predates their being taught how to behave. Comparative psychologist James Anderson at Kyoto University in Japan and his colleagues wondered whether other species make social evaluations in a similar way. They began by testing whether capuchin monkeys would show a preference for people who help others. The capuchins watched an actor struggle to open a container with a toy inside. Then this actor presented the container to a second actor, who either helped or refused to assist. Afterwards, both actors offered each capuchin food, and the monkey chose which offer to accept. When the companion had been helpful, the monkey
Pedestrians signal to stop driverless cars SHOULD I stay or should I go? An LED display for driverless cars aims to give pedestrians at a crossing the power to communicate with vehicles, signalling for them to stop or drive on. Blink, created by researchers at the Royal College of Art and Imperial College London, turns the awkward dance of eye contact and hand gestures that happens when a car 16 | NewScientist | 18 February 2017
SOLSTOCK/GETTY
Sam Wong
slows down while someone is waiting to cross the road into something driverless cars can understand. Blink integrates an organic light-emitting diode display into the windscreen and rear window of a car and uses light signals to show pedestrians when the car is aware of their presence. If the car’s sensors detect a pedestrian, a figure lights up, accompanied by a bleep. If a pedestrian raises a hand as a stop sign, the figure turns green, indicating the pedestrian can cross, and the car is prevented from moving forward. If they place a hand out to
Lastly, both actors offered the monkeys a reward as before. The monkeys had no preference when actor A had given back the balls, but chose actor B more often when A had not returned the balls (Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, doi.org/bzj5). Anderson thinks the results show that monkeys and dogs make social evaluations in a similar way to human infants. “If somebody is behaving antisocially, they probably end up with some sort of emotional reaction to it,” he says. Dogs’ long relationship with humans means they have evolved to be extremely sensitive to our behaviour – not just in relation to them, but also to other humans.
But monkeys in the wild are likely to use similar processes to decide which members of their group they can cooperate with, says Frans de Waal of Emory University, Georgia. “Chances are that if these animals can detect cooperative tendencies in human actors, they also can in their fellow primates.” And our own sense of morality may even have its roots in these sorts of primitive evaluations of others. “In humans, there may be this basic sensitivity towards antisocial behaviour in others. Then through growing up, inculturation and teaching, it develops into a full-blown sense of morality,” says Anderson. The capacity to evaluate others could stabilise complex social groups by enabling individuals to exclude uncooperative members, says Kiley Hamlin at the University of British Columbia, Canada. This could discourage bad behaviour and help individuals avoid harmful social interactions. De Waal sees a strong link between morality and reputation. “Human morality is very much based on reputation building, because why would you try to be good if no one cares?” he says. “I don’t think you can conclude that it makes the monkeys moral beings, but ‘image scoring’, as reputation building is sometimes called, provides an –You scratch their back, I’ll like you– important key mechanism.” n
the side to motion the car forward, the figure turns red and the car continues. But George Filip at the University of Nottingham, UK, isn’t convinced it is a good idea to give pedestrians control over autonomous cars. He says cities could end up gridlocked because pedestrians keep stopping cars. Manufacturers should wait until the novelty of driverless cars has worn off before creating car-pedestrian
“The concept invests pedestrians with the car-stopping powers of lollipop men and women”
communications systems, he says. “We need to learn how people actually interact with autonomous vehicles.” The idea is to help people feel more comfortable around driverless cars, says Blink co-creator Raunaq Bose. “This provides a really nice opportunity to rebalance the road power dynamic.” The concept effectively invests pedestrians with the car-stopping powers of lollipop men and women. The team hasn’t yet tested the device on a driverless car, but Bose says several automotive companies have expressed interest. Matt Reynolds n