- Email: [email protected]
Peer review report 2 on “Is laparoscopic appendectomy feasible for complicated appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis”
International Journal of Surgery 37 Supplement 1 (2017) S258
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
International Journal of Surgery journal homepage: www.journal-surgery.net
Peer Review Report
Peer review report 2 on “Is laparoscopic appendectomy feasible for complicated appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis”
1. Original submission 1.1. Recommendation Minor Revision 1.2. Comments to the author This is a spirited and rigorous attempt at a meta-analysis, especially as the publications that the authors had to work with had
DOI of published article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.044 1743-9191
inherent flaws. The authors have a clear understanding of the methodology and the question was worth asking. The authors are clearly not native English speakers and the manuscript will need proof reading and the abbreviations were used intermittently and not consistently defined. Anonymous reviewer
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
International Journal of Surgery journal homepage: www.journal-surgery.net
Peer Review Report
Peer review report 2 on “Is laparoscopic appendectomy feasible for complicated appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis”
1. Original submission 1.1. Recommendation Minor Revision 1.2. Comments to the author This is a spirited and rigorous attempt at a meta-analysis, especially as the publications that the authors had to work with had
DOI of published article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.044 1743-9191
inherent flaws. The authors have a clear understanding of the methodology and the question was worth asking. The authors are clearly not native English speakers and the manuscript will need proof reading and the abbreviations were used intermittently and not consistently defined. Anonymous reviewer