Vol. 46, No. 1, 1972
BIOCHEMICAL
PENICILLIN
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
INTERACTION WITH GUANOSINE
Lou S. Kan, Frank K. Schweighardt, Department
of Chemistry,
Pittsburgh,
Received
October
San Kao, and Norman C. Li
Duquesne University
Pennsylvania
15219
7, 1971
Because of the widespread use of penicillins as anti%?!!%%l agents the question of how penicillin affects the function and struct&e of nucleic acids becomes of biological importance. This communication reports a nuclear magnetic resonance study which shows that penicillin-G interacts with guanosine in dimethyl sulfoxide and can break the strong guanosine-cytidine pairing by forming a binary hydrogen-bonded complex of penicillinguanosine. The binding sites in penicillin are the carboxylatfb and the carbonyl groups, while the NH and NH2 groups of guanosine act as hydrogen donors. Because of the widespread agents,
the question
structure
of how penicillins
of nucleic
wish to report
a nuclear
guanosine-cytidine
penicillin-guanosine. NMR spectrometers, spectrometer
magnetic
multiplet
interacts
resonance
as antibacterial the function
and
significance.
We
(nmr) study which
with guanosine
and can break the
pairing '9' by forming a binary complex of Although we have used both 600 and lOO- MHz
we find
that only by using a higher-field
NMR
spectrum case, 250 MHe) can a well-resolved Figure 1 gives the nmr spectrum of 0.2 be obtained.
(in this
of penicillin M penicillin
affect
acids becomes of biological
shows that penicillin-G strong
use of penicillins
(250 MHz) in D20, and shows that the phenyl peak is a and the CH2 peak an AB quartet, J&l5 HE. Both the phenyl
and CH2 signals
appear as singlets
at 60- and lOO- MHz. decomposes in less In unbuffered aqueous solution , penicillin than 24 hours, whereas in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), we have found it to be stable
for more than seventeen 22
Copyright
@ 1972 by Academic
Press, Inc.
weeks at 30°.
For this
Vol. 46, No. 1,1972
2.60
2.70
Figure
1.
reason,
BIOCHEMICAL
2.60
2.50
-0.90
0.60
0.70
-1.10
-,.oo
and guanosine
in penicillin
4 HZ, JBX = 9 HZ.
-
represent
-3.00
-3.10
-3.20
(250 MHs) in D20.
is not sufficiently
pH for nmr measurements,
between penicillin signals
-
--0.40 -0.50 l?P.M.
Nmr spectrum of 0.2 M penicillin-G
and because guanosine
at neutral
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
soluble
we have studied
in DME%d6.
in D20
the interaction
The CHA - CHB - NHX
an ABX system, with JAX y 0, JAB&
The CZCOO- signal
methyl groups are nonequivalent,
is a singlet,
giving
rise
and the m
to two separate
sing-
lets. When guanosine penicillin shift
proton
decreases
is added to 0.1 M penicillin peaks are shifted,
in the order:
C6H5, as shown in Figure
2A.
and the extent
of downf.ield
C&200-> CHB> NH, CH3, CH3> CHA> CH2, If
penicillin
guanosine field
in DMSO-d6, the
is added to 0.1 M
in DMSO-d6, the NH2 signal in guanosine is shifted downand slightly broadened, the G-NH signal is shifted downfield 23
Vol. 46, No. 1, 1972
BIOCHEMICAL
B
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
G-NH
AX
XYX X
/
/
G-8H 79oi)--x-o-
x-o-x-o-x
(I
HZ. 77a
1
o&t
380 lb0 -i -o-----oI 150 1
X
bao- a / 660 --o-
-0-e
I /x
ZH, b40;
140w
1
lGfx
To;
/
0-o
5M
b
7
*
9
0012345673
9
lo
(P EN’)x
lo’,
10
M
Figure 2A. Chemical shifts of penicillin-G protons at 100 MHz (TMS as internal reference) in DMSOsolutions containing 0.1 M penicillin and varying concentrations of guanosine. Figure 2B. Chemical shifts of guanosine protons vs. penicillin concentration in DMSO (x, with Of1 M guanosine; 03th 0.1 M guanosine and 0.1 M cytidine present). For numbering scheme, see scales used for G-NH and for G-NH2. Figure 3. Note the different at a pace double that signal
is only slightly
(see Figure
2B).
affected
the two NH2 protons, The other
broadened,
by the addition
The 10% increase
of G-NH compared with penicillin.
of G-NH2 and greatly
and the G-8H
of penicillin
in the rate of downfield
that of G-NH2 is understandable, only one is involved proton
because of
in hydrogen bonding with
is hydrogen bonded to DMSO. These
nmr data lead to the conclusion
that
a penicillin-guanosine
is formed in DMSO, in which two hydrogen
bonds are involved,
the binding
3.
cular
sites
shift
are as shown in Figure
models has shown that this
is reasonable. 24
Construction
complex and
of mole-
The G&H is at a
Vol. 46, No. 1, 1972
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
NH I c=o
GUANOSINE
PENICILLIN-G
Figure plex.
3.
distance
Schematic representation
away from the hydrogen-bonding
frequency
is only slightly
Figure containing
2B further
affected
0.1 M guanosine,
standable
because of hydrogen-bonding On the addition
0.1 M guanosine
alone.
of penicillin. in a solution
in DMSOis downfield in DMSO. This is under-
between guanosine
of penicillin
and
to a solution
containing
the G-NH2 signal shifts the rate of downfield shift is not as great on adding penicillin
Furthermore
the trend
in a guanosine-cytidine taining
its
and 0.1 M cytidine,
however,
rate observed
0.1 M guanosine
com-
and therefore
by the addition
0.1 M cytidine
in a solution
cytidinelt2.
sites,
shows that the G-NH2 signal
from that
field:
of penicillin-guanosine
guanosine
alone,
mixture
to a solution
containing
is that the G-NH2 signal approaches
25
guanosim
frequency
that of a solution
at high concentration
downas the
of penicillin.
con-
Vol. 46, No.
1,1972
BIOCHEMICAL
These results
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
lead us to conclude
guanosine-cytidine
pairing,
that penicillin
a binary
disrupts
the
complex penicillin-guanosine
is formed. From the chemical taining
shift
0.1 M guanosine
G, as shown in Figure
and varying
for
1:l
guanosine-cytidine
cytidine guanosine
higher
therefore
ing 0.1 M penicillin+
K = 4 l./mole
uridine,
penicillin
and nucleoside
tween penicillin+
is strong
nmr spectra
and thymidine).
the guanosine-
enough to disrupt
the
cytidine
data
in penicillin-G,
= cytidine,
obtained
for
both
show that the interaction or adenosine unlike
be-
is significantly
The reason can very well
and adenosine,
the carboxylate
contain-
(nucleoside
guanosine,
both NH and NH2 groups in the same molecule. site
for
and is
for DMSOsolutions The
protons
and cytidine
weaker than with guanosine.
thymidine,
constant
in DMSO. The penicillin-
and 0.1 M nucleoside
adenosine,
that
The formation
des-
pairing,
We have also obtained
fact
constant
complex is about 30 l./mole,
complex192 , also determined
guanosine-cytidine
of penicillin-
the formation
complex2.
than the value
interaction
con-
complex, in the manner previously
of the penicillin-guanosine considerably
concentrations
2B, we have determined
of 1:l penicillin-guanosine cribed
data for G-NH2 in solutions
lie
in the
do not have
With uridine
and
group appears to be the only binding
with the NH group in uridine
and thymidtne
the hydrogen donor, Using an infrared formation
constant
guanosine
and cytidine
method, Pitha,
of over 105 for
have reported
et al.3,
hydrogen-bonding
derivatives in chloroform. the formation constant acceptor,
between Since DMSOis of the guanosine-
a strong
proton
cytidine
complex is only about 4 in this medium 192 .
vertical
stadcfng occurs for
mononucleosides4, 26
a
In water
and there
is little
as
Vol. 46, No. 1,1972
evidence
for
BIOCHEMICAL
formation
of specific
tween mononucleosides the structure certainly double
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
in water.
According
of the guanosine-cytidine
DNA molecule
The experiments carried
hydrophobic
reported
in this
in DMSOis almost
scheme known to occur in
DNA, since the interior
is largely
of the double
and is therefore
communication
out in DMSOmedium, and have relevance
biological
systems.
Certainly
"nonaqeous."
therefore
were
to behavior
complex in chloroform
one has to conclude that
in DMSOis far
stranded
in
if one compares the formation
stantha of guanosine-cytidine DMSO (k=4),
complexes be-
to Newmark and Cantor',
pair
the same as the base-pairing stranded
bonding
hydrogen-bonded
more similar
con-
(Kv1105)
and in
the degree of hydrogento interactions
in water than
in chloroform. The nmr results with a Varian
in this
communication
A-60, a Varian HA-100 or a spectrometer
a superconducting
solenoid,
The data illustrated spectrometer. viously. 5
described
at a frequency
in Figure
Sample preparation
were obtained incorporating
of 250 MHz for
2 were obtained
protons.
with a Varian
was the same as described
Ha-100 pre-
Acknowledgment: This work was supported by Grant GM 10539-09 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, U.S. Public Health Service, and used in part the NMR Biomedical Facilities at Carnegie-Mellon University supported by Public Health Service grant RR 00292. References: 1. 2.
3. 4. 5.
Newmark, R. A. and Cantor, C. R., 3. Amer. Chem. Sot., 90, 5010 (1968). Schwei hardt, F. K., Moll, C., and Li, N. C., J. Magn. Resonance, 2, 35 71970). Yitha J., Jones, R. N., and Pithova, J., Can. J. Chem., & 1044 k$%ker M P Chan, S. I., and Ts'o P.O.P., sot., 8 , '52r;l ii968). Wang, Is . M. and Li, N. C., J. Amer. Chem. Sot.,
27
J. Amer. Chem. 88, 4592 (1966).