Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 6 (2002) 109–116
Peptide structures ¨ Carl Henrik Gorbitz Department of Chemistry, University of Oslo, N-0315 Oslo, Norway
Abstract Prediction of solid state peptide structures from the amino acid sequence is difficult not only because of the inherent flexibility of the molecules, but also due to the vast number of possible interactions between hydrogen bond donating and accepting groups. This review focuses on recent advances into rationalizing and controlling peptide conformations and hydrogen bond networks by utilization of special amino acid residues, cyclization, addition of terminal blocking groups and more. 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. Keywords: Helices; Turns; Molecular conformations; Hydrogen bonds; Nanotubes; Crystal engineering
1. Introduction Controlling and predicting the aggregation of molecules in the solid state is an ultimate goal in the field of research now known as crystal engineering [1–3]. The development of new materials relies most of all on the accumulated knowledge obtained from recurring packing patterns in crystal structures [**4]. Several families of compounds, such as ureas, guanidines, dicarboxylic acids and aminopyridines, have served as models to decipher the underlying mechanisms responsible for the observed interactions between various functional groups, in particular hydrogen bonds as well as metal coordination [**5]. Design strategies for supramolecular synthesis have been particularly successful for planar molecules with self-complementary (homomeric) or complimentary (heteromeric) hydrogen bonding groups that are involved in two-dimensional interaction patterns [3,**5] (although, due to the crystal packing arrangement, the over-all hydrogen bond network may actually be three-dimensional). Endeavors into the third dimension are dominated by studies of coordination compounds, reviewed in this journal last year [6]. Studies of peptides constitute an alternative approach in this respect. Systematic investigations of intermolecular interactions have been few, however [*7,*8,9], since many peptide chemists are concerned primarily with molecular conformations. In these cases hydrogen bonds are used primarily as tools to reach a target molecular structure by
¨ E-mail address:
[email protected] (C.H. Gorbitz).
formation of specific intramolecular interactions. This review presents important progress that has been made in the study of peptide structures from late 2000 to early 2002.
2. Hydrogen bonding patterns in peptides and proteins The basic molecular structure of a peptide includes hydrogen bond donors (.N–H) and acceptors (.C5O) in the peptide bonds in addition to the C-terminal –COO 2 carboxylate group and the N-terminal –NH 1 3 amino group. The first three groups could easily take part in twodimensional hydrogen bond network, but the amino group seeks three distinctly unplanar hydrogen bond acceptors. The hydrogen bond patterns of free, unblocked peptides are therefore inherently three-dimensional. The total number of hydrogen bonds is n12 for a peptide with n residues (minimum value counting only interactions with N–H donors), which may nevertheless appear as a manageable number for small peptides as far as predicting the structure is concerned. However, several complicating factors are present. First of all, retention of a particular hydrogen bond motif (synthon) in a number of different crystal structures requires that hydrophobic groups, if present, can be efficiently segregated into independent regions in the crystal. Moreover, such regions must be flexible with respect to their ability to encompass hydrophobic groups of various sizes. For peptides, with ubiquitous hydrophobic
1359-0286 / 02 / $ – see front matter 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. PII: S1359-0286( 02 )00044-X
110
¨ / Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 6 (2002) 109–116 C.H. Gorbitz
entities of variable sizes in the side chains, finding robust modes of hydrophobic aggregation is a particular challenge. Examples of isostructural peptides are few, while examples of complete change of crystal packing and molecular interactions upon addition of a single methyl or methylene group are abundant, e.g., Arg-Asp /Arg-Glu [10]. Secondly, hydrogen bond donors and acceptors may not only be present in the peptide main chain, but also in the side chains and in cocrystallized solvent molecules. The number of possible hydrogen bond types then increase dramatically and renders any structure prediction futile. The above discussion suggests that hydrogen bonding patterns in peptide structures can be simplified in a number of ways:
• avoid residues with hydrogen bond donating and accepting groups in the side chain; • if possible avoid cocrystallization of solvent molecules; • remove multi-donating and multi-accepting terminal groups by adding N- and C-terminal blocking groups or by making a cyclic peptide. It may finally be added that the carbonyl groups of the peptide bonds are, when not accepting H atoms from N–H or O–H donors, invariably involved in weaker interactions with C a –H donors [11]. To the authors knowledge no systematic studies of the impact of C a –H???O interactions in peptides have been carried out, although several recent investigations indicate a previously unrecognized importance in protein structures [*12].
Fig. 1. Helix–loop–helix structure of a 21-residue apolar peptide. H atoms that are not involved in hydrogen bonds have been omitted for clarity. Side chains are shown as thin, black lines [**26].
¨ / Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 6 (2002) 109–116 C.H. Gorbitz
111
3. Linear N- and C-blocked peptides Most of the peptide structures currently being published have blocking groups at both termini and contain noncoded amino acids. Popular modifications include a,bdehydro and a,a-disubstituted amino acids, such as DZ Phe and aminoisobutyric acid (Aib), respectively. These residues are strong inducers of b-bends and 3 10 -helices, and are used in small model peptides (often without intramolecular hydrogen bonds) to study conformational preferences for selected sequences of amino acids residues [13–21]. Studies of b-sheets in somewhat larger peptides rely on formation of tight b-hairpins. – L-Pro-L-Xaa– (for type I turns) or – L-Pro-Gly– (for type I or type II turns) sequences are still in use for this purpose, but application of – D-Pro-D-Xaa / Gly– sequences are becoming more common since they promote the mirror image type I9 and type II9 turns that are stereochemically favorable for bsheet formation [*22,*23]. An elegant covalent assembly of two prefabricated units of peptide secondary structure into a single 17-residue synthetic peptide has been accomplished by Karle et al. [**24]. In the ‘Meccano set approach’ stereochemical control over peptide folding in one hairpin domain and one helical domain was achieved by incorporating residues like Aib and D-Pro. This methodology clearly departs from the ‘hydrophobic-in / hydrophilic-out’ algorithm for the amino acid residues that is usually followed in de novo protein design [25]. A second impressive example of a designer peptide is provided by Ramagopal et al. in presenting the structure of a 21-residue peptide in a helix–loop–helix motif (Fig. 1) [**26]. The strategy for reaching the desired folding pattern relied extensively on the conformation-directing control provided by a large number of DZ Phe-residues. The design furthermore involved weak interactions between the two helices in a ‘wedge into a groove’ arrangement. While most b-sheets in synthetic peptides involve antiparallel strands, there are also examples of parallel sheets. The associated model compounds must contain a non-peptide link for chain reversal. Recent examples include peptide-related systems like the D-Pro-(1,1-dimethyl)-1,2-diaminoethyl unit [*27] and diketopiperazine [*28] as well as the more exotic ferrocene structure [29]. The conformational restrictions of an a-amino acid chain constitute a driving force towards helix formation, and older textbooks on peptide structures accordingly dismissed the use of more flexible b- or g-amino acids as components in helices. Nevertheless, researchers are now becoming increasingly aware of the properties and potential usefulness of such residues, not only in structures with designed turns [*23,*27], but also in helices. An example is shown in Fig. 2, which depicts the first helix formed by a peptide constructed entirely from g-amino acid residues [*30]. Formation of an amyloid-like parallel
Fig. 2. 2.6 14 helical structure of a g-tetrapeptide. Side chains and blocking groups are shown as thin, black lines [*30].
b-sheet by the Boc-b-Ala-Aib-b-Ala-Ome tripeptide represents another interesting application for b-amino acids [*31].
4. Cyclic systems Apart from natural products (and their analogues and derivatives) [32–36], cyclic peptides are studied for conformational insight, and may include the above-mentioned non-coded residues [37]. A neat example is shown in Fig. 3 where two D-Pro-Gly type II9 turns have been introduced in a cyclodecapeptide to produce a b-sheet with all functional groups positioned on the same side of the ring. These types of scaffold are developed as tools in de novo protein design and peptide mimicry [*38]. Cyclic a-peptides with an even number of alternating Dand L-residues possess unique structural features in that they, under conditions that favor hydrogen bonding, can stack to form hollow, b-sheet-like tubular structures. These stacks can be incorporated into biological membranes, and were recently reported to possess intriguing antibacterial properties [**39]. Attention is now also focused on careful
112
¨ / Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 6 (2002) 109–116 C.H. Gorbitz
Fig. 3. Structural prototype of a regioselectively addressable functionalized template (RAFT). (a) b-sheet and two type II9 b-turns induced by D-Pro–Gly sequences. The side chains have been removed for clarity. (b) The side chains of the four para-nitrophenylalanine residues protrude from the same side of the cyclopeptide ring [*38].
selection of hydrophobic side chains in order to induce higher order molecular organization in the solid state through aromatic edge-to-face interactions [*7]. In the cyclic D,L-a-peptides adjacent carbonyl groups point in opposite directions, giving apolar nanotubes by stacking. By utilizing instead unsaturated d-amino acids, Gauthier et al. succeeded in aligning all carbonyl groups in the same direction, thus producing highly polarized tubes (Fig. 4) [**40]. Since all stacks in the crystal were oriented in the same direction, the resulting material was very anisotropic.
5. Free peptides The crystal structures of unblocked peptides usually 2 include one to three independent –NH 1 3 ??? OOC– hydrogen bonds, each generating a so-called head-to-tail chain. A frequent motif involves two hydrogen bonds of this type in rather planar sheets found in structures that are divided into distinct hydrophobic and hydrophilic layers. With this
type of packing arrangement an acceptor for the third amino H atom must be present in an amino acid side chain or in a cocrystallized molecule (water, other solvent or guest), since it cannot be accepted by a main chain carboxylate group. A good example is seen for (R)phenylglycyl-(R)-phenylglycine, for which the inherent demand for a third acceptor has been utilized to form an inclusion complex with methyl phenyl sulfoxide (Fig. 5) with chiral recognition of the guest molecule [*41]. A very different type of structure was observed for the first time last year for the four dipeptides Leu / Phe-Leu / Phe, which have one-dimensional hydrogen bond networks in the shape of tubes [*42]. The crystal structures result from closepacking of such tubes, mediated by hydrophobic interactions as illustrated for Phe-Phe in Fig. 6. The hydrophilic water-filled channels that run along the hexa˚ A related gonal axes have a diameter of about 10 A. structure is adopted by Trp-Gly [43], which has subsequently been shown to exhibit very rare negative thermal expansion along the helical axis [*44]. Other hydrophobic dipeptides devoid of conventional hydrogen bond acceptors (and donors) in the side chains, may form either
¨ / Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 6 (2002) 109–116 C.H. Gorbitz
113
hydrophobic layers or columns [45] or, when both side chains are small (not Leu or Phe), a second type of tubular structure with hydrophobic channels (Fig. 7) [46].
6. Collagen model peptides Detailed information about the structure of the fibrous protein collagen (which actually exists in at least 15 modifications) has been derived from high quality, high resolution crystallographic studies of synthetic peptides like [(Pro-Pro-Gly) 10 ] 3 [*47] and (Pro-Hyp-Gly) 3 -Ile-ThrGly-Ala-Arg-Gly-Leu-Ala-Gly-(Pro-Hyp-Gly) 4 [*48]. The work on these collagen-mimics is based on the methodology developed for solving and refining protein structures.
7. Experimental aspects Synchrotron radiation is now used routinely for collection of data sets on peptide crystals [**26,32,34,*44,49]. The ab initio crystal structure determination of the peptide Piv-Pro-Gly-NHMe (forming a Type-II b-turn) from powder diffraction data [*50] highlights the existing opportunities for structure determination when single crystals cannot be prepared.
8. Conclusions The establishment of conformational properties of regular and non-coded amino acids will continue to give important contributions to the understanding of peptide structures, and interesting applications of designed peptides become apparent, such as artificial receptors [*28]. As the ability to design molecules and domains with predetermined folding reaches maturity, more attention will probably be focused on de novo protein design, but also on intermolecular interactions and the generation of supramolecular structures, such as sheets [*31,*41] and tubular structures by cyclic molecules [*7,**39,**40]. For unblocked peptides the prediction of crystal structures will continue to be a tremendous challenge, but the unprecedented observation of nanotube formation by supramolecular aggregation of hydrophobic dipeptides illustrates nicely that taking measures to reduce the number of donors and acceptors in the molecules can yield interesting results [*42]. The left-handed dipeptide double helix of Val-Ala (Fig. 7) [46], has thus been a recurring motif in the structures of six additional dipeptides, all sharing the ¨ same hydrogen bonding pattern (C.H. Gorbitz, unpublished data). Furthermore, tripeptides with sequence Gly-Xaa1-
Fig. 4. Alignment of dipoles by stacking of cyclic tripeptides built from d-amino acids [**40].
Xaa2, where Xaa is a hydrophobic residue, display limited structural diversity. These observations indicate that reasonably stable molecular scaffolds can indeed be found for the notoriously erratic short, unblocked peptides, and that structure prediction and manipulation (crystal engineering) could be feasible. It may finally be added that for predictable construction of layered structures (such as Ref. [*41]) it would be most interesting to reduce the –NH 1 3 group from a 3-fold to a 2-fold donor (but not to a single donor by addition of blocking groups like Boc). Possible alternatives could be application of –NH 2 Me 1 (or other alkyl) or =NH 21 as the peptide N-terminal.
114
¨ / Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 6 (2002) 109–116 C.H. Gorbitz
Fig. 5. (a) Hydrogen bonds in a hydrophilic layer of (R)-phenylglycyl-(R)-phenylglycine. Molecules connected by hydrogen bonds are related by 2-fold screw axes. (b) Layers seen edge-on. The third amino H atom is accepted by a cocrystallized methyl phenyl sulfoxide molecule that is completely embedded in the hydrophobic layer [*41].
Fig. 6. Channels with hexagonal symmetry formed in the structure of Phe-Phe. Two amino H atoms are donated to peptide acceptors in the hydrophilic tubes generated by the peptide main chains, the third amino H-atom points straight into the channel where it is accepted by a disordered water molecule [*42].
¨ / Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 6 (2002) 109–116 C.H. Gorbitz
115
Fig. 7. (a) Val-Ala left-handed double helix with 3-fold screw symmetry in ball-and-stick (left) and space-fill representation (right). Side chains have been reduced to H atoms for clarity; one peptide strand is shown in a darker tone. (b) View along the channels with a double helix identified by a triangle. Side chains appear as thin, black lines [46].
References Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as: * of special interest; ** of outstanding interest. [1] Lehn J-M. Perspectives in supramolecular chemistry—from molecular recognition towards molecular information processing and selforganization. Angew Chem Int Ed 1990;29:1304–19. [2] Etter MC. Hydrogen bonds as design elements in organic chemistry. J Phys Chem 1991;95:4601–10. [3] Desiraju GR. Supramolecular synthons in crystal engineering—a new organic synthesis. Angew Chem Int Ed 1995;34:2311–27. [**4] Desiraju GR. Chemistry beyond the molecule. Nature 2001;412:397–400, An excellent overview of supramolecular chemistry and crystal engineering at the interface with biological and materials science. ¨ CB, Beatty AM. Crystal engineering of hydrogen-bonded [**5] Aakeroy assemblies—a progress report. Aust J Chem 2001;54:409–21, A comprehensive review of advances in the use of strong hydrogenbond interactions in directed assembly of organic molecular solids and inorganic–organic hybrid materials. [6] Batten SR. Coordination polymers. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 2001;5:107–14. [*7] Bong DT, Ghadiri MR. Self-assembling cyclic peptide cylinders as nuclei for crystal engineering. Angew Chem Int Ed 2001;40:2163– 6, Aromatic interactions between cyloocatpeptide dimers. [*8] Bong DT, Clark TD, Granja JR, Ghadiri MR. Self-assembling organic nanotubes. Angew Chem Int Ed 2001;40:988–1011, A thorough discussion of nanotube formation by different types of molecules. Special focus on cyclic peptides. [9] Nangia A. Organic nanoporous structures. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 2001;5:115–22. [10] Eggleston DS, Hodgson DJ. Guanidyl-carboxylate interactions:
[11] [*12]
[13]
[14]
[15] [16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
crystal structures of arginine dipeptides. Int J Peptide Protein Res 1985;25:242–53. Vargas R, Garza J, Dixon DA, Hay BP. How strong is the C a –H??? O5C hydrogen bond? J Am Chem Soc 2000;122:4750–5. Fabiola GF, Krishnaswamy S, Nagarajan V, Pattabhi V. C–H???O hydrogen bonds in b-sheets. Acta Crystallogr 1997;D53:316–20, The first investigation of C–H???O interactions in b-sheets of high resolution protein structures. Contains references to previous protein work. Tanaka M, Oba M, Imawaka N, Tanaka Y, Kurihara M, Suemume H. Conformational study of heteropentapeptides containing an aethylated a,a-disubstituted amino acid: (S)-butylethylglycine(52amino-2-ethylhexanoic acid) within a sequence of dimethylglycine (52-aminoisobutyric acid) residues. Helv Chim Acta 2001;84:32– 46. Koch KN, Linden A, Heimgartner H. Synthesis of conformationally restricted cyclic pentadepsipeptides via direct amide cyclization. Tetrahedron 2001;57:2311–26. ¨ Gessmann R, Bruckner H, Kokkindis M. Tripeptide Z-Aib-AibHyp-Ome. Acta Crystallogr 2001;E57:o492–4. Gobbo M, Nicotra A, Rocchi R, Crisma M, Toniolo C. Influence of glycosylation on the conformational preferences of folded oligopeptides. Tetrahedron 2001;57:2433–43. Ejsmont K, Makowski M, Zaleski J. N-(tert-Butoxycarbonylglycyla,b-dehydrophenylalanylglycylphenylalanyl)-4-nitroaniline. Acta Crystallogr 2001;C57:205–7. Inai Y, Oshikawa T, Yamashita M, Hirabayashi T, Ashitaka S. Solid-state conformations of oligopeptides possessing an -(AibZ D Phe) 2 -segment. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2001;2:892–7. Inai Y, Oshikawa T, Yamashita M, Hirabayashi T, Hirako T. Structural and conformational properties of Z-b-(1-naphthyl)-dehydroalanine residue. Biopolymers 2001;58:9–19. Inai Y, Oshikawa T, Yamashita M, Kato I, Hirabayashi T. A novel looping structure of linear hexapeptide Boc-[D-Ala-(Z)-bphenyldehydroalanine-L-Ala] 2 -OMe. Chem Lett 2001:472–3. Vijayaraghavan R, Kumar P, Dey S, Singh TP. Design of peptides with a,b-dehydro residues: a dipeptide with a branched b-carbon
116
[*22]
[*23]
[**24]
[25]
[**26]
[*27]
[*28]
[29]
[*30]
[*31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
¨ C.H. Gorbitz / Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 6 (2002) 109–116 dehydro residue at the (i11) position, methyl N-(benzyloxycarbonyl)-a,b-didehydrovalyl-L-tryptophanate. Acta Crystallogr 2001;C57:1220–1. Das C, Naganagowda GA, Karle IL, Balaram P. Designed b-hairpin peptides with defined tight turn stereochemistry. Biopolymers 2001;58:335–46, D-Pro Type I9 and II9 hairpins studied by NMR and X-ray diffraction. Karle IL, Gopi HN, Balaram P. Peptide hybrids containing a- and b-amino acids: structure of a decapeptide b-hairpin with two facing b-phenylalanine residues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:3716– 9, Type I9 turn with D-Pro in a peptide that also contains b-amino acid residues. Karle IL, Das C, Balaram P. De novo protein design: crystallographic characterization of a synthetic peptide containing independent helical and hairpin domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:3034–7, An ambitious and demanding peptide design accompanied by challenging crystallography. Hill RB, Raleigh DP, Lombardi A, Degrado NF. De novo design of helical bundles as models for understanding protein folding and function. Accounts Chem Res 2000;33:745–54. Ramagopal UD, Ramakumar S, Sahal D, Chauhan S. De novo design and characterization of an apolar helical hairpin peptide at atomic resolution: Compaction mediated by weak interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:870–4, An impressive piece of work on a large peptide. Thorough discussion of weak interactions. Woll MG, Lai JR, Guzei IA, Taylor SJC, Smith MEB, Gellman SH. Parallel sheet secondary structure in g-peptides. J Am Chem Soc 2001;123:11077–8, A rare example of successful design of a peptide with parallel b-sheet. The molecules studied furthermore contain g-amino acids. Wennemers H, Conza M, Nold M, Krattiger P. Diketopiperazine receptors: a novel class of highly selective receptors for binding small peptides. Chem Eur J 2001;7:3342–7, Synthesis, NMR and activity studies of artificial receptors constructed from a diketopiperazine backbone with peptidic side chains. Unexpectedly high specificity for peptide substrates. Moriuchi T, Nomoto A, Yoshida K, Ogawa A, Hirao T. Chirality organization of ferrocenes bearing podand dipeptide chains: synthesis and structural characterization. J Am Chem Soc 2001;123:68– 75. Seebach D, Brenner M, Rueping M, Schweizer B, Jaun B. Preparation and determination of X-ray-crystal and NMR-solution structures of g 2,3,4 -peptides. Chem Commun 2001;207–8. First example of helix-formation by a peptide constructed entirely from g-amino acids. Good correlation between X-ray and NMR data. Maji SM, Drew MGB, Banerjee A. First crystallographic signature of amyloid-like fibril forming b-sheet assemblage from a tripeptide with non-coded amino acids. Chem Commun 2001;19:1946–7, An achiral N,C-blocked tripeptide generates an infinite parallel b-sheet in the crystal structure. Asano A, Doi M, Kobayashi K, Arimoto M, Ishida T, Katsuya Y, Mezaki Y, Hasegawa H, Nakai M, Sasaki M, Taniguchi T, Terashima A. Effects of amino acids and chirality for molecular folding of desoxazoline-ascidiacyclamide derivatives: X-ray crystal structures of four cyclic octapeptides including unusual amino acids, cyclo(-Ile-aThr-D-Val-Thz-) 2 , cyclo(-Ala-aThr-D-Val-Thz-Ile-aThr-DVal-Thz-), cyclo(-Val-aThr-D-Val-Thz-Ile-aThr-D-Val-Thz-), and cyclo(-Ile-aThr-Val-Thz-Ile-aThr-D-Val-Thz-). Biopolymers 2001; 58:295–304. Sørensen D, Nielsen TH, Christophersen C, Sørensen J, Gajhede M. Cyclic lipoundecanpeptide amphisin from Pseudomonas sp. strain DSS73. Acta Crystallogr 2001;C57:1123–4. Asano A, Taniguchi T, Sasaki M, Hasegawa H, Katsuya Y, Doi M. A b-sheet structure formed by C–H???O hydrogen bonds between the thiazole rings and amide bonds of a dimeric desoxazoline ascidiacyclamide analogue. Acta Crystallogr 2001;E57:o834–8. Murray PJ, Kranz M, Ladlow M, Taylor S, Berst F, Holmes AB, Keavey KN, Jaxa-Chamiec A, Seale PW, Stead P, Upton RJ, Croft
[36]
[37]
[*38]
[**39]
[**40]
[*41]
[*42]
SL, Clegg W, Elsegood MRJ. The synthesis of cyclic tetrapeptoid analogues of the antiprotonzoal natural product apicidin. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2001;11:773–6. Zanotti G, Falcigno L, Saviano M, D’Auria G, Bruno BM, Campanile T, Paolillo L. Solid state and solution conformation of 7 [Ala ]-phalloidin: a synthetic phallotoxin analogue. Chem Eur J 2001;7:1479–85. Koch KN, Hopp G, Linden A, Moehle K, Heimgartner H. Conformational Analysis of the cyclic pentadepsipeptide cyclo(Tro-AibAib-Aib-Aib) in the solid state and in solution. Helv Chim Acta 2001;84:502–12. ¨ Peluso S, Ruckle T, Lehmann C, Mutter M, Peggion C, Crisma M. Crystal structure of a synthetic cyclodecapeptide for template-assembled synthetic protein design. ChemBioChem 2001;2:432–7, Synthesis and crystal structure of a structural prototype of a model template for use in de novo protein design. Fernandez-Lopez S, Kim H-S, Choi EC, Delgado M, Granja JR, Khasanov A, Kraehenbuehl K, Long G, Weinberger DA, Willcoxen KM, Ghadiri R. Antibacterial agents based on the cyclic D,L-apeptide architecture. Nature 2001;412:452–5, Cell death and other detrimental effects observed for bacteria exposed to cyclic peptides, which may in the future be used as antibiotics against infectious diseases. Gauthier D, Baillargeon Drouin M, Dory YL. Self-assembly of cyclic peptides into nanotubes and then into highly anisotropic crystalline materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 2001;40:4635–8, Innovative supramolecular design of peptide nanotubes (with small central channels) from d-amino acids. Parallel alignment of all polar groups in the structure yields a crystal with very high anisotropy. Akazome M, Ueno Y, Ooiso H, Ogura K. Enantioselective inclusion of methyl phenyl sulfoxides and benzyl methyl sulfoxides by (R)phenylglycyl-(R)-phenylglycine and the crystal structures of the inclusion cavities. J Org Chem 2000;65:68–76, Inclusion properties of peptides utilized to make achiral guest / host systems. ¨ Gorbitz CH. Nanotube formation by hydrophobic dipeptides. Chem Eur J 2001;7:5153–9, First examples of supramolecular formation of hydrophobic peptide nanotubes from dipeptides. Channel diam˚ eter up to 10 A.
[43] Emge TJ, Agrawal A, Dalessio JP, Dukovic G, Inghrim JA, Janjua K, Macaluso M, Robertson LL, Stiglic TJ, Volovik Y, Georgiadis MM. Alaninyltryptophan hydrate, glycyltryptophan dihydrate and tryptophylglycine hydrate. Acta Crystallogr 2000;C56:e469–71. [*44] Birkedal H, Schwarzenbach D, Pattison P. Observation of uniaxial negative thermal expansion in an organic crystal. Angew Chem Int Ed 2002;41:754–6, An unusual phenomenon monitored over a wide temperature range. ¨ [45] Gorbitz CH. L-Phenylalanyl-L-alanine dihydrate. Acta Crystallogr 2001;C57:575–6. ¨ [46] Gorbitz CH. L-Valyl-L-alanine. Acta Crystallogr 1996;C52:1764–7. [*47] Berisio R, Vitagliano L, Mazzarella L, Zagari . Crystal structure of the collagen triple helix model [(Pro-Pro-Gly) 10 ] 3 . Protein Sci ˚ study showing structural 2002;11:262–70, High resolution (1.3 A) details with unprecedented accuracy. [*48] Kramer RZ, Bella J, Brodsky B, Berman HM. The crystal and molecular structure of a collagen-like peptide with a biologically relevant sequence. J Mol Biol 2001;311:131–47, The terminal zones show 7-fold symmetry, while the central zone more closely matches a 10-fold symmetric model. [49] Birkedal H, Schwarzenbach D, Pattison P. N-Z-Pro-D-Leu using synchrotron radiation data from a very small crystal. Acta Crystallogr 2001;C57:975–7. [*50] Tedesco E, Harris KDM, Johnston RL, Turner GW, Raja KMP, Balaram P. Ab initio structure determination of a peptide b-turn from powder X-ray diffraction data. Chem Commun 2001;16:1460– 1, The crystal structure determination of a tripeptide directly from powder X-ray data illustrates recent developments of powder methods.