Performance of methods for the measurement of natural rubber latex (NRL) proteins, antigens and allergens

Performance of methods for the measurement of natural rubber latex (NRL) proteins, antigens and allergens

S78 Abstracts SATURDAY Performance of Methods for the Measurement of Natural Rubber Latex (NRL) Proteins, Antigens and Allergens V. J. Tomazic-Jezic...

25KB Sizes 4 Downloads 118 Views

S78 Abstracts

SATURDAY

Performance of Methods for the Measurement of Natural Rubber Latex (NRL) Proteins, Antigens and Allergens V. J. Tomazic-Jezic1, D. H. Beezhold2, H. Hashim3, T. Palosuo4, M. Raulf-Heimsoth5, M. Swanson6, R. G. Hamilton7; 1FDA, Rockville, MD, 2NIOSH, Morgantown, WV, 3RRIM, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA, 4NPHI, Tampere, FINLAND, 5BGFA, Bochum, GERMANY, 6Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 7Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, MD. RATIONALE: Determination of natural rubber latex (NRL) allergenic proteins in medical and consumer products promotes rational selection of products to minimize sensitization. The objective of this multi-center study was to assess the variability and relative analytical performance of available laboratory methods to measure NRL proteins. METHODS: Extracts from powdered and powder-free latex medical gloves (n=30, 5ml PBS/G, agitation-2hr), were analyzed for total protein (ASTM D5712 Modified Lowry-4 labs), antigenic proteins using rabbit antisera (ASTM- D6499-2 labs; LEAP-1 lab), total allergens using latexspecific human IgE antibody (RAST/ELISA Inhibition Assays-6 labs) and for individual H. brasiliensis allergens Hev b 1,3,5,6.02 using monoclonal antibodies (FITkit-7 labs). Precision profile analysis evaluated intraand inter-laboratory variability and inter-method comparability. RESULTS: The sum of the 4 Hev b allergen monoclonal assay values displayed the highest correlation with RAST/ELISA inhibition values for total allergen, which were considered most reflective of the extractable latex allergen content from gloves (r2=0.91-0.95). The total protein levels as measured with ASTM D5712 Modified Lowry method showed the next best correlation with RAST/ELISA inhibition assay generated allergen content (r2=0.79-0.85). While results of the LEAP and D6499 latex antigen assays correlated well with one another (r2=0.92), they were less reflective of glove allergen content compared to RAST/ELISA inhibition assay results. CONCLUSIONS: Good agreement between the combined Hev b 1,3,5,6.02 content and the allergen level as assessed by human IgE-based RAST/ELISA inhibition assays, suggests that that monoclonal antibodybased immuno-enzymetric assay analysis may be a useful indicator for the allergen content of NRL products. Funding: Self-funded

211

J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL FEBRUARY 2004