Peritonitis, as a Result of a Retrograde Postoperative Incisional Infection

Peritonitis, as a Result of a Retrograde Postoperative Incisional Infection

Accepted Manuscript Case report: Peritonitis, as a result of a retrograde postoperative incisional infection Christine T. Lopp, DVM, Cathleen A. Mocha...

714KB Sizes 0 Downloads 35 Views

Accepted Manuscript Case report: Peritonitis, as a result of a retrograde postoperative incisional infection Christine T. Lopp, DVM, Cathleen A. Mochal-King, DVM, MS, DACVS

PII:

S0737-0806(15)00489-X

DOI:

10.1016/j.jevs.2015.07.017

Reference:

YJEVS 1921

To appear in:

Journal of Equine Veterinary Science

Received Date: 16 May 2015 Revised Date:

17 July 2015

Accepted Date: 24 July 2015

Please cite this article as: Lopp CT, Mochal-King CA, Case report: Peritonitis, as a result of a retrograde postoperative incisional infection, Journal of Equine Veterinary Science (2015), doi: 10.1016/ j.jevs.2015.07.017. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

Case report: Peritonitis, as a result of a retrograde postoperative incisional infection

2

C. T. Lopp, DVM and C. A. Mochal-King, DVM, MS, DACVS

3 Christine T. Lopp, DVM, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi

5

State University, P.O. Box 6100, Mississippi State, MS 39762; Telephone: 336-944-1565; Fax: 662-

6

325-0243; Email: [email protected]

7

Cathleen A. Mochal-King, DVM, MS, DACVS, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary

8

Medicine, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box 6100, Mississippi State, MS 39762; Telephone: 662-

9

325-1400; Fax: 662-325-0243; Email: [email protected]

SC

M AN U

10

key words: incisional infection, peritonitis, medical maggot, cecum

12

TE D

11

RI PT

4

Corresponding author:

14

Christine T. Lopp, DVM

15

Department of Clinical Sciences

16

College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University

17

P.O. Box 6100, Mississippi State, MS 39762

18

Telephone: 336-944-1565

19

Fax: 662-325-0243

20

Email: [email protected]

AC C

EP

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abstract:

22

An eight-year-old Quarter horse x Walking horse cross mare was referred for treatment of septic

23

pedal osteitis and subsequently developed a cecal impaction which was resolved surgically. Post-

24

operative enteritis and incisional drainage developed in the short-term post-operative period.

25

One month post-operatively, the mare developed an acute septic peritonitis with Streptococcus

26

equi zooepidemicus that was likely a sequela to the incisional infection. Systemic antibiotic

27

therapy and peritoneal lavage was instituted, however, repeated culture and sensitivity of the

28

abdominal fluid revealed a multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli. In the face of antibiotic treatment

29

failure, medical grade Phaenicia sericata larvae were placed into the abdomen to be used as a

30

biological debriding agent. Clinical improvement was seen for 6 weeks, until the mare was

31

euthanized due to a small intestinal strangulating lesion. Additionally, this case report is a

32

description of the novel use of medical maggots in the treatment of a multi-drug resistant

33

peritonitis in a horse.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

21

37 38 39 40

EP

36

Case report: peritonitis, as a result of a retrograde postoperative incisional infection

1. Introduction: Septic peritonitis is a complication following abdominal surgery and

AC C

35

TE D

34

typhylotomy in horses and typically results in polymicrobial sepsis, predominantly with gram negative enteric bacteria 1,2,3. The overall prevalence of septic peritonitis following colic surgery is reported to be 3.1% 3 to 11% 4. Wound complication rates following a single initial

41

laparotomy vary from 7.4% 5 to as high as 37% 6, with higher rates of wound suppuration

42

reported in horses that had caecal or large colon obstruction, enterotomy6,7, or post-

43

operative peritonitis3. Abdominal contamination and peritonitis may lead to prolonged

44

incisional drainage, however little evidence exists in the literature that supports septic

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT peritonitis as a result of a retrograde postoperative incisional infection. Formation of

46

extraperitoneal incisional abscesses following colic surgery has been reported in 3 horses,

47

however in these cases the abscesses invaded the rectus abdominis muscle and did not

48

penetrate into the peritoneum8. This report describes the surgical and postsurgical

49

management of an 8-year-old Quarter Horse x Walking horse cross mare which developed a

50

septic peritonitis likely resulting from an ascending incisional infection. Additionally, this

51

case report describes the novel, off-label use of medical grade maggots as a biological

52

debriding agent in the treatment of a multidrug resistant peritonitis in a horse.

SC

RI PT

45

2. Case Report

54

2.1 History: An 8-year-old Quarter Horse x Walking horse cross mare initially presented for

55

chronic septic pedal osteitis in the left forelimb and was treated with surgical debridement of

56

the distal phalanx under general anesthesia. Perioperative antibiotics with cefazolin (11mg/kg

57

bwt i.v, q8h)a and gentamicin (GentaFuse; 6.6 mg/kg bwt i.v.)b were given. Following recovery

58

from anesthesia, the mare was maintained on flunixin meglumine (Banamine; 1.1 mg/kg bwt,

59

i.v., q12h)c and lidocaine hydrochloride (Lidocaine 2% Inj; 0.05 mg/kg/min)d, and butorphanol

60

(Torbugesic; 0.01-0.02 mg/kg bwt i.v. or i.m.)e was given as needed for additional analgesia. An

61

intravenous regional limb perfusion was performed with cefazolin and morphine (Morphine

62

Sulfate Injection)f at the time of surgery and then repeated 2 days later.

63

Two days following her surgical debridement of P3, the mare was observed to show mild to

64

moderate colic signs (decreased appetite, reduced fecal output, increased recumbency,

65

inappetance, infrequent rolling) and was subsequently diagnosed with a cecal impaction on

66

rectal palpation. The mare was initially treated with intravenous and enteral fluids, however

67

due to unrelenting pain, surgical intervention was elected.

68

2.2 Surgical procedure: Antimicrobial therapy with cefazolin and gentamicin was maintained.

69

The patient was premedicated with xylazine (AnaSed; 1.1 mg/kg bwt i.v.)g and butorphanol.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

53

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT General anesthesia was induced with ketamine (Ketaset; 2.2 mg/kg bwt i.v.)h and

71

diazepam(Diazepam injection; 0.05 mg/kg bwt i.v.)i, and maintained with isofluorane (Isoflurane;

72

1.5-3%)j and oxygen(5 L/min). A routine 30 cm ventral midline celiotomy was performed which

73

revealed a markedly enlarged cecum filled with hard ingesta. The cecal apex was exteriorized,

74

isolated with laparotomy sponges, and draped with a sterile plastic sheet. A routine typhlotomy

75

was performed. Ingesta was removed by lavaging the cecum with water administered using a

76

nasogastric tube and bilge pump inserted through the typhlotomy site. The typhlotomy was

77

closed with 2-0 Polydioxanone suture using a simple continuous pattern, which was oversewn

78

with 2-0 polydioxanone in a Cushing pattern. The cecum was lavaged with sterile 0.9% saline

79

solution, containing 500 mg Gentamicin/L and 5x10^6 IU potassium penicillin (PfizerPen) k, prior

80

to being replaced into the abdomen. The surgeons replaced gowns and gloves, re-draped the

81

surgical field, and lavaged the abdomen with 5 L sterile 0.9% saline solution which was removed

82

by suction. Gross contamination during or after the typhlotomy was not appreciated and

83

therefore abdominal drains were not deemed necessary. A final liter of sterile 0.9% saline

84

solution containing 500 mg gentamicin/L and 5x10^6 IU potassium penicillin was left in the

85

abdomen. The linea alba was sutured with No. 3 Polygalactin 910 in 3 segments using a simple

86

continuous pattern and the subcutaneous tissue was apposed with 2-0 Polydioxanone suture

87

using a simple continuous suture pattern. The skin was apposed with stainless steel staples. The

88

incision was protected during recovery by the placement of an adherent absorbent dressing

89

(Telfa pad). After recovery, a clean belly bandage, consisting of sterile cotton padding held in

90

place with adhesive bandage material (elastikon), was placed to protect the incision site from

91

external contamination.

92

2.3 Postoperative course: Recovery from anesthesia was uneventful and post-operative

93

antibiotic therapy was continued with cefazolin (11 mg/kg bwt i.v., q8h) and gentamicin (6.6

94

mg/kg bwt i.v., q24h) in the immediate post-operative period, however 48 hours after surgery,

95

the patient developed anterior enteritis, as evidenced by an elevated temperature (103.4°F),

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

70

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT moderate signs of endotoxemia, significant volumes of serosanguinous nasogastric reflux, and

97

segmental intramural edema and thickening of the small intestine (4.5-9 mm) (Image 1 and

98

Image 2). The horse was treated with continuous infusion i.v. of balanced polyionic fluids,

99

lidocaine hydrochloride (0.05 mg/kg/min), metoclopramide (Metoclopramide; 0.04 mg/kg/hr)l ,

100

and partial parenteral nutrition (lactated ringers solution containing 500mL of 50% dextrose, and

101

500 mL of aminosyn (Aminosyn II 10%) m) at 0.5-1 L/hr, for 4.5 days. Polymyxin B (Polymyxin B

102

for injection; 5000 u/kg bwt i.v., q8h) n and sodium heparin (Heparin; 40 u/kg bwt sub cut., q8h)o

103

were administered for 2 days. Enrofloxacin (Baytril 100; 7.5 mg/kg bwt i.v., q24h) p was

104

administered for 5 days for treatment of anterior enteritis. Nasogastric reflux ceased after 48

105

hours of enrofloxacin therapy.

106

Incisional drainage was noted 5 days after the celiotomy (Image 3) at which point the skin

107

staples around the points of suppuration were removed to facilitate drainage and a hernia belt

108

with sterile cotton padding adjacent to the incision was placed to allow for daily bandage

109

changes. Incisional ultrasound showed a hypoechoic area in the subcutaneous tissues at the

110

cranial aspect (2 cm caudal to the cranial extent of the incision) and at the middle aspect of the

111

incision (4 cm caudal to the caudal draining site). Palpation of the incision with sterile gloves

112

revealed no defect in the abdominal wall, however through palpation of the cranial half of the

113

incision purulent material could be expressed from the drainage sites. Enrofloxacin was

114

discontinued after 5 days of treatment. Chloramphenicol (Viceton)q, (Chloramphenicol

115

Palmitate oral suspension; 50 mg/kg bwt per os, q8h) r administration was initiated after

116

discontinuing enrofloxacin. Chloramphenicol was selected due to the culture and sensitivity

117

patterns of the Streptococcus uberis from her pedal osteitis with a sensitivity of less than 4

118

mcg/mL. Chloramphenicol treatment was continued for an additional 20 days to treat the

119

incisional drainage as well as the pedal osteitis.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

96

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT For a period of 4 weeks, the horse showed clinical signs of improvement and could have been

121

discharged to the care of her owners, however, she remained at the hospital for boarding during

122

her period of post-operative stall confinement. The area of solar debridement over P3 showed

123

progression of healthy granulation tissue and solar cornification, and the patient’s lameness

124

(grade 3/5) was not noticeable at the walk. The abdominal incision site continued to drain a

125

moderate amount of slightly yellow-tinged purulent fluid until day 25 post celiotomy, at which

126

point the incisional drainage abruptly lessened until it was essentially 2 small spots seen on the

127

belly bandage over a 2-3 days period.

128

At 31 days post laparotomy, the patient acutely developed signs of severe septic peritonitis

129

(temperature 106, and HR 120 bpm), depression, had mild ataxia and muscle weakness, and was

130

hesitant to walk. Nasogastric intubation yielded 10 L net reflux, and abdominal ultrasound

131

revealed a mild amount of free peritoneal fluid. An abdominocentesis was aseptically

132

performed approximately 10 cm to the left of midline, using a (10 inch) bitch catheter, to avoid

133

potential contamination from the incision and to minimize the risk of enterocentesis in case the

134

cecum had formed an adhesion on midline. Grossly purulent fluid, with a nucleated cell count of

135

125,750 cells/uL, was obtained in a steady stream from a depth of approximately 8 inches and

136

cultured a pure growth of Streptococcus equi zooepidemicus.

137

The horse was administered 1000 mg prednisolone sodium succinate(Solu-Delt-Cortef)s i.v. and

138

7.2% saline solution (2 ml/kg bwt i.v.) followed by continuous infusion i.v. of balanced polyionic

139

fluids, lidocaine hydrochloride (0.05 mg/kg/min), metoclopramide (0.04 mg/kg/hr), and partial

140

parenteral nutrition (lactated ringers solution containing 500mL of 50% dextrose, and 500 mL of

141

aminosyn) at 0.5-1 L/hr, for 4 days. Polymyxin B (5000 u/kg bwt i.v., q8h) was administered for 2

142

days. Potassium penicillin (22000 u/kg bwt i.v., q6h) and gentamicin (6.6 mg/kg bwt i.v., q24h)

143

were administered for 14 days.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

120

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Inadequate clinical progress was made over the first 2 days of treating the peritonitis closed

145

(persistent fevers, elevated heart rate, and progressive abdominal distention), therefore a left

146

flank laparotomy was made and two ventral abdominal drains were placed to facilitate

147

peritoneal lavage. The abdomen was lavaged daily with 10 L balanced polyionic fluids containing

148

potassium penicillin and heparin. Abdominal fluid was sampled from the drains daily and

149

evaluated for clinical improvement until day 5 when the patient’s cell count improved at which

150

time the drains were removed. Following removal of the drains, the horse’s condition plateaued

151

and then started to decline steadily with increasing amounts of abdominal fluid distention and

152

development of cyclic fevers. Two days following drain removal, abdominocentesis was

153

repeated (Day 40) and submitted for culture. Culture revealed Escherichia coli, which showed

154

marked resistance to multiple antibiotics, with the exception of tetracycline. The antimicrobial

155

treatment of potassium penicillin and gentamicin was discontinued at this time and

156

oxytetracycline therapy was initiated due to the sensitivity results. A 6.6 mg/kg bwt i.v., q12h

157

dose of oxytetracycline was chosen initially to try to minimize the rapid die-off of gram-negative

158

bacteria and thus hope to reduce the amount of endotoxin released. The mare was pretreated

159

with polymyxin B (5000 u/kg bwt i.v., q8h) to help bind and inactivate endotoxins predicted to

160

be released following the initiation of oxytetracycline (Liquamycin, LA-200) t.

161

Despite the low dose oxytetracycline and pretreatment with polymyxin B, a 24-48 hours period

162

of endotoxemia was encountered which caused a transient period of ileus (lack of auscultable

163

gastrointestinal borborygmi and mild to moderate nasogastric reflux) and also resulted in

164

rotational deviation of P3 from the dorsal hoof wall on her left front foot (the same foot affected

165

with pedal osteitis). After 3 days of low dose oxytetracycline, the endotoxemia seemed to have

166

resolved, however the patient’s abdomen became further distended with peritoneal fluid and

167

the cyclic fevers were no longer regressing. The oxytetracycline dose was increased (10 mg/kg

168

bwt i.v., q12h) which resulted in initial improvement (reduction in fevers and less abdominal

169

fluid), however, after the second dose, the mare developed watery diarrhea, and the dose was

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

144

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT reduced back to the 6.6 mg/kg bwt i.v., q12h. Weight loss during this time period was estimated

171

to be about 80 kg, and bloodwork revealed an anemia of chronic disease.

172

The mare was moved into an isolation stall due to her multi-drug resistant infection, which

173

limited her progressive monitoring with the ultrasound. Ultrasound evaluation of the abdomen

174

during this time frame revealed the progression of a 4-7 mm thickness fibrin layer coating the

175

serosal surface of the abdominal organs diffusely (Image 4). Given the mare’s static response to

176

oxytetracycline, profound antimicrobial resistance of the E.coli, and the marked fibrin formation

177

visible on ultrasound, a novel form of treatment was sought to reduce bacterial load and reduce

178

fibrin adhesion formation.

179

On day 56 post-celiotomy, the most cranial and dependent abdominal drain was replaced and

180

the abdomen was lavaged with 5L LRS and allowed to empty by gravity. Approximately 3000

181

disinfected Phaenicia sericata larvae (Medical Maggots) u were introduced into the abdomen via

182

the abdominal drain and the drain was removed (Image 5). A belly bandage was placed over the

183

open drain site with porous materials to allow a vent for oxygen passage into the abdomen as

184

well as a portal for maggot self-extraction.

185

24 hours after the first application of medical maggots into the abdomen, the mare had her first

186

24 hour period without a fever since the initial onset of peritonitis. Incidentally, there was a

187

dramatic increase in the number of flies in the mare’s isolated/completely enclosed stall, and

188

when the abdominal lavage was repeated 4 days later, no maggots were recovered. Ultrasound

189

evaluation revealed marked reduction in the fibrin layer in a 10 cm radius from the site of

190

maggot introduction (Image 6), however, areas more remote to the drain portal continued to

191

show fibrinous adhesion formation. Cytology results indicated marked reduction in inflammatory

192

response, with a decrease in nucleated cell count from 186,000/uL to 1400/uL.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

170

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Serial abdominal ultrasonography revealed progression and consolidation of an abscess capsule

194

visible on the right ventral abdomen that extended caudodorsally toward the base of the cecum

195

and craniomedially toward the ventral midline incision (Image 7). A second application of

196

medical maggots was performed on day 87, through a new portal placed directly into the

197

abscess in the right ventral flank region. Repeated ultrasound indicated reduction in the size of

198

the abscess where the maggots had been inserted (Image 8).

199

The patient continued to improve clinically, with resolution of fevers, improved appetite, and

200

weight gain. After approximately 4 weeks on intravenous oxytetracycline, perivascular irritation

201

necessitated a switch from intravenous to oral medications thus oxytetracycline was

202

discontinued and doxycycline (Doxycycline powder; 10 mg/kg bwt per os, q12h)v was initiated.

203

The mare continued to do well for 2 weeks until she became acutely and severely colicky. Rectal

204

examination, in conjunction with ultrasonography was highly suggestive of a strangulating small

205

intestinal lesion. Repeat laparotomy was declined by the owner and the mare was euthanized

206

on day 98, due to unrelenting pain.

207

2.4 Post mortem findings: Necropsy revealed strangulation/incarceration of approximately 8

208

feet of distal jejunum by a fibrous band of adhesions in the left inguinal region. The necropsy

209

also revealed a very well defined fibrous capsule of the abdominal abscess tracking from the

210

cranial aspect of the ventral midline incision up into the abdomen and wrapping caudally

211

towards the body of the cecum (Image 9). Upon further evaluation of the abscess, no purulent

212

material was present. The typhlotomy site was not involved in the abscess and there was no

213

evidence of eosinophilic granulomatous inflammation or residual maggots within the abdomen

214

at necropsy.

215 216

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

193

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3. Discussion:

218

Cecal impactions are a serious and not infrequent complication of patients hospitalized with

219

musculoskeletal disease9,10,11, and can rapidly result in cecal rupture despite medical

220

management2,11,12. Surgical intervention has a reported short-term survival rate of 82%9 to

221

95%11, which is greater than or comparable to that of medical management9,11, however surgery

222

involving cecal disorders have been associated with increased incidence of peritonitis and

223

incisional suppuration6,13,14 likely due to direct trauma to the incisional tissue during

224

manipulation and the anatomic positioning of the cecum often results in the typhlotomy being

225

mere inches from the abdominal incision, making contamination highly likely.

226

Surgical site infection is a common and important complication that occurs in 7.4%5 to 37%6 of

227

horses undergoing abdominal surgery for acute gastrointestinal disease, with the two most

228

common sources of contamination being flora of the gastrointestinal tract or superficial

229

contamination of the wound from skin bacteria or environmental contaminants13. Suggested

230

risk factors include use of polyglactin 910 to close the linea alba, trauma to the incisional edges,

231

endotoxemia on admission, contamination with intestinal content during surgery, repeat

232

celiotomy, and poor anesthetic recovery. Reported sequelae to incisional drainage is herniation,

233

incisional dehiscence, and evisceration15,16.

234

Reported causes of postoperative peritonitis include intestinal infarction and necrosis of a

235

segment of the gastrointestinal tract before or after surgical intervention, contamination during

236

surgery, or leakage from the anastomosis or enterotomy site17,18. The most common reported

237

pathogens isolated from horses with peritonitis include E. coli, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus,

238

Rhodococcus, Bacteroides, Clostridium, and Fusobacterium spp18.

239

While many of the same risk factors and bacterial isolates seem to be shared between peritonitis

240

and incisional infection, there is lack of evidence in previous literature to support a causal

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

217

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT relationship between these two conditions15. In this case report, the acuteness and severity of

242

the onset of clinical signs of septic peritonitis combined with the pure growth of Streptococcus

243

equi zooepidemicus, a common commensal organism of the equine epidermis, led to suspicions

244

that this case of peritonitis had resulted from an ascending incisional infection and internal

245

abscess formation that had subsequently ruptured internally once the external drainage tracts

246

had sealed over with granulation tissue. This explanation seems supported by the post mortem

247

finding of the abscess track that was directly leading from the incision site. It is speculated that

248

the incisional drainage may have communicated with an extraperitoneal incisional abscess,

249

similar to the cases reported by Rubio Martinez et al,8 which, when the granulation tissue had

250

sealed the drainage spots, built up pressure enough to break through the peritoneum and

251

disseminate into the abdomen. To the authors’ knowledge this is the first reported case of an

252

ascending incisional infection documented as causing a septic peritonitis in a horse.

253

Serial ultrasound evaluation of the abdomen during the treatment of peritonitis in this horse

254

revealed the progression of a fibrin layer coating the serosal surface of the abdominal organs

255

diffusely. Given the patient’s static response to oxytetracycline, marked antimicrobial resistance

256

of the E.coli, and the marked fibrin on ultrasound, a novel form of treatment was sought to

257

reduce bacterial load and reduce fibrin adhesion formation.

258

Up until the 1940’s maggot therapy was used commonly by human surgeons for controlling soft

259

tissue infections and as an adjunct to surgical resection for osteomyelitis. The advent of modern

260

antibiotics and improved surgical techniques drastically reduced the use of these “tiny

261

surgeons”, but they are still FDA approved for the debridement of non-healing necrotic skin and

262

soft tissue wounds. Due to their seemingly distasteful nature of consuming necrotic tissue,

263

fibrin, and bacteria, medical maggots seem to have become reserved for treatment of wounds

264

that are not responsive to conventional treatment or that have multi-drug resistant bacterial

265

infections. As part of their role as debriding agents, maggots secrete potent proteolytic enzymes

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

241

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT that have significant anti-microbial activity against bacteria such as Staphylococcus,

267

Streptococcus, Pseudomonas, and Escherichia coli, causing breakdown of biofilm formation and

268

making the wound environment unsuitable for bacterial colonization19,20.

269

In human medicine, medical maggots are most commonly used on pressure sores, venous ulcers,

270

neuropathic foot ulcers, and non-healing traumatic or postsurgical wounds, however reported

271

off-label applications include the use of maggots to debride areas in the pleural and peritoneal

272

spaces21. In equine medicine, medical maggots are most often used in conjunction with surgical

273

debridement as a non-traumatic, minimally invasive means of removing necrotic tissue from an

274

extensive foot infection involving deeper structures of the foot such as the coffin bone, collateral

275

cartilages, distal interphalangeal joint, and navicular bursa20,22. Other more rare case reports of

276

their use include debridement of necrotic tissues in cases of supraspinus bursitis, abdominal

277

wound dehiscence, chronic infected leg wounds, soft tissue abscesses, and one case with a

278

MRSA infection over an internal fixation device used to stabilize a fracture20. To the authors’

279

knowledge, no literature exists documenting the use of medical maggots within a body cavity of

280

a horse. After consultation with Monarch Labs, it was decided to use a dose of 3000 maggots,

281

the same dose that had been used in the cases of human peritonitis and pleuritis. The usual

282

dose of disinfected larvae is 5-10 maggots per square cm of wound surface area; however

283

consultation with the laboratory revealed that doses of 16000 maggots had been reported to

284

cause myiasis and hepatic encephalopathy in sheep, and thus maximal doses of 6000 larvae per

285

application cycle were recommended.

286

The risks associated with use of medical maggots are not well reported due to limited use,

287

however, one must consider the potential risks of the treatment such as myiasis, eosinophilic

288

granulomatous reaction, failure of the maggots to survive and grow within the abdomen,

289

inadequate debridement of the fibrinous material dispersed throughout the abdomen, and

290

failure to recover all maggots from the abdominal cavity at the end of the treatment cycle. A

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

266

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT relatively conservative dose of Phaenicia sericata larvae was used to minimize the risk of myiasis

292

and degree of eosinophilic inflammation. At necropsy, no evidence of inappropriate tissue

293

consumption or eosinophilic response was seen. In this case report, no maggots were recovered

294

from the abdominal lavage 5 days after application, which raises concern about failure of the

295

maggots to survive within the abdominal cavity or loss of maggots within the abdomen. After

296

consultation with Monarch Labs, it was decided to leave the ventral drain portal open as a vent

297

to allow oxygen access for the Phaenicia sericata larvae and also to act as a portal for self-

298

extraction once the larvae were satiated, as is in accordance with their natural life cycle. This is

299

similar to how the medical maggot treatments were carried out in human thoracic and

300

peritoneal cavities and was thought to be appropriate for larvae placement within the equine

301

peritoneal cavity. It is possible that the larvae died upon instillation into the abdominal cavity

302

and their bodies were resorbed, however, the lack of eosinophilic granulomatous reaction at

303

necropsy does not suggest this. At the time of maggot implantation, the mare was being housed

304

in a completely confined concrete isolation building with controlled airflow into and out of the

305

stall. For the week following administration of the Phaenicia sericata larvae, there was an

306

exponential increase in the number of flies within the stall which could not be accounted for by

307

external migration alone. The other option for maggot administration is to apply the maggots

308

into the body cavity while still contained within a porous fabric bag (Biobag System). This allows

309

debridement via proteolytic enzyme secretion, but greatly limits the phagocytosis of fibrinous

310

material and the ability of the larvae to migrate to more confined areas of contamination. The

311

benefit of application of maggots within a porous bag would be that it assures that there will be

312

no loss of larvae within the cavity and might have also been a way to quantify larval survival

313

within the abdomen. However, larval bag placement was deemed less appropriate for this case

314

because it was felt that the bagged larvae would be less efficacious in debridement of the entire

315

abdomen, the bag might act as an irritant to cause more serosal adhesion formation, and would

316

also require a more invasive surgical procedure for retrieval. It is entirely plausible that the

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

291

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT improvement in the mare’s clinical status was due to the treatment with prolonged tetracycline

318

administration, however, the decision to add maggot therapy was made in response to a

319

suspected treatment failure at the low dose oxytetracycline (further peritoneal fluid distension

320

and cyclic fevers) and intolerance of the higher dose of oxytetracycline (diarrhea). The authors

321

feel confident in saying that the maggots caused no harm and likely contributed positively to the

322

treatment of the peritonitis if only by facilitating the continued treatment with low dose

323

oxytetracycline.

324

Subjectively, the authors feel that the use of medical maggots as a debriding agent was

325

efficacious in reducing fibrinous adhesions in the immediate area of application; however, the

326

maggots did not migrate as far from the site of administration as was hoped. It is speculated

327

that a greater surface area might have been able to be debrided by either using a larger dose

328

(6000 maggots) or by administering smaller doses of maggots at multiple sites around the

329

abdomen. It is also speculated that earlier administration of the medical maggots may have

330

improved their efficacy, as the fibrinous adhesions would have been less well established. No

331

deleterious effects were seen as a result of either maggot application, but further studies are

332

warranted to determine an appropriate dose and administration distribution, and expected

333

efficacy of intraperitoneal maggot debridement therapy.

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

317

Manufacturers’ addresses:

335

a SAGENT Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Schaumburg, Illinois, USA

336

b Sparhawk Laboratories, Inc., Lenexa, Kansas, USA

337

c Intervet Inc., Merck & Co. Inc. Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA

338

d Hospira, Inc, Lake Forest, Illinois, USA

339

e Fort Dodge Animal Health, a division of Wyeth, Pfizer Inc, New York, New York, USA

340

f West-Ward, Eatontown, New Jersey, USA

341

g Akorn, Inc., Decatur, Illinois, USA

AC C

334

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT h Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc., St. Joseph, MO, USA

343

i Hospira, Inc., Lake Forest, Illinois, USA

344

j Piramal Healthcare Limited, Digwal Village, Andhra Pradesh, India

345

k Roerig, division of Pfizer, Inc., New York, New York, USA,

346

l Teva Parenteral Medications, Inc, Irvine, California, USA

347

m Hospira, Inc, Lake Forest, Illinois, USA

348

n X-GEN Pharmaceuticals Inc., Big Flats, New York, USA

349

o SAGENT Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Schaumburg, Illinois, USA

350

p Bayer Healthcare LLC, Animal Health Division, Shawnee Mission, Kansas, USA

351

q Bimeda, Inc, Le sueur, Minnesota, USA

352

r Wedgewood Pharmacy, Swedesboro, New Jersey, USA

353

s Pharmacia & Upjohn Co., Division of Pfizer Inc, New York, New York, USA

354

t Zoetis Inc, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA

355

u Monarch Labs, Irvine, California, USA

356

v Wedgewood Pharmacy, Swedesboro, New Jersey, USA

SC

M AN U

TE D

357

RI PT

342

Image Legend:

359

Image 1 and Image 2: (day 3 post-celiotomy) This longitudinal image of a small intestinal loop,

360

located in the left ventral flank region, demonstrates a wall that is thickened and edematous,

361

consistent with anterior enteritis. Note there is scant amount of free peritoneal fluid and the serosal

362

surfaces of the intestine appear smooth.

363

Image 3: (day 8) Copious drainage soaking through the belly bandage from draining sites at the

364

cranial (black arrow) and middle (blue arrow) aspects of the incision line. Digital pressure on the

365

incision line caudal to the draining sites resulted in expression of approximately 10 mL of purulent

366

material. The incision site was cleaned daily with 4% chlorhexidine and saline and the belly bandage

367

changed daily.

AC C

EP

358

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Image 4: (day 47) Moderate amount of anechoic free peritoneal fluid and fibrin lining the serosal

369

surfaces of the small intestine and body wall in the left ventral abdomen.

370

Image 5: (day 56) Approximately 3000 medical grade maggots were instilled into the abdomen via

371

the left ventral abdominal drain portals.

372

Image 6: (day 81) Left ventral abdomen at the site of the cranial drain portal, 25 days after the first

373

medical maggot therapy. There is a mild amount of free peritoneal fluid, but the fibrin lining the

374

intestine is no longer identifiable.

375

Image 7: (day 87) Encapsulated abscess in the right ventral flank region between the body wall and

376

cecum. This window was used for the site of the second medical maggot application.

377

Image 8: (day 96) Right ventral flank portal site, 7 days after the second application of medical

378

maggots.

379

Image 9: Necropsy revealed a well-defined abdominal abscess that tracked from the cranial aspect of

380

the ventral midline incision (arrow) up into the abdomen and wrapped caudally towards the body of

381

the cecum. Note the body is in left lateral recumbency.

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

368

EP

382 References:

384

[1] Hawkins JK, Bowman KF, Roberts M. Peritonitis in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 203:284

385

[2] Smith LCR, Payne RJ, Boys Smith SJ, Bathe AP, and Greet TRC. Outcome and long-term follow-up

386

of 20 horses undergoing surgery for caecal impaction: A retrospective study (2000-2008). Equine

387

Vet J. 2010; 42: 388-392.

388

[3] Mair TS1, Smith LJ. Survival and complication rates in 300 horses undergoing surgical treatment

389

of colic. Part 2: Short-term complications. Equine Vet J. 2005; 37(4):303-9.

AC C

383

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [4] Driscoll, N., Baia, P., Fischer, A. T., Brauer, T. and Klohnen, A. Large colon resection and

391

anastomosis in horses: 52 cases (1996–2006). Equine Veterinary Journal 2008; 40: 342–347

392

[5] Freeman, D.E., Hammock, P., Baker, G.J., Foreman, J.H., Schaeffer, D.J., Richter, R.-A., Inoue, O.,

393

and Magid, J.H. Short- and long-term survival and prevalence of post operative ileus after small

394

intestinal surgery in the horse. Equine vet. J., Suppl. 2000; 32, 42-51

395

[6] Phillips, T.J. and Walmsley, J.P. Retrospective analysis of the results of 151 exploratory

396

laparotomies in horses with gastrointestinal disease. Equine vet. J. 1993; 25, 427-431

397

[7] Honnas, C.M. and Cohen, N.D. Risk factors for wound infection following celiotomy in horses. J.

398

am. vet. med. Ass. 1997; 2100, 78-81

399

[8] Rubio Martinez L.M., Cribb N.C., and Koenig J.B. Extraperitoneal incisional abscess formation

400

after colic surgery in 3 horses. Equine Vet. Educ. 2012; 24, 109-115

401

[9] Aitken, M.R., Southwood, L.L., Ross, B.M., and Ross, M.W. Outcome of surgical and medical

402

management of cecal impaction in 150 horses (1991-2011). Vet Surg. 2014; doi: 10.1111/j.1532-

403

950X.2014.12286.x

404

[10] Roberts, C.T., and Slone, D.E. Caecal impactions managed surgically by typhlotomy in 10 cases

405

(1988-1998). Equine vet. J., Suppl. 2000; (32) 74-76

406

[11] Plummer A.E., Rakestraw P.C., Hardy J., and Lee R.M. Outcome of medical and surgical

407

treatment of cecal impaction in horses: 114 cases (1994-2004). JAVMA. 2007; 231, 1378-1385

408

[12] Dart A.J., Dowling B.A., and Hudgson D.R. Cecal disease. Equine vet. Educ. 1999; 11, 182-188

409

[13] Ingle-Fehr J.E., Baxter G.M., Howard R.D., Trotter G.W., and Stashak T.S. Bacterial Culturing of

410

Ventral Median Celiotomies for Prediction of Postoperative Incisional complications in Horses. Vet.

411

Surg. 1997; 26, 7-13

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

390

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [14] Kobluk CN, Ducharme NG, Lumsden JH, et al. Factors affecting incisional complication rates

413

associated with colic surgery in horses: 78 cases (1983-1985). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989; 195:639-

414

642

415

[15] Freeman D.E., Rotting A.K., and Inoue O.J. Abdominal Closure and Complications. Clinical

416

Techniques in Equine Practice. 2002; 1, 174-187

417

[16] French N.P., Smith J., Edwards G.B., and Proudman C.J. Equine surgical colic: risk factors for

418

postoperative complications. Equine vet. J. 2002; 34, 444-449

419

[17] Hillyer M.H., Wright C.J. Peritonitis in the horse. Equine vet. Educ. 1997; 9, 136-142

420

[18] Hardy J., Rakestraw P.C. Postoperative Management for Colics. Clinical Techniques in Equine

421

Practice. 2002; 1, 188-197

422

[19] Jones G., Wall R. Maggot-therapy in veterinary medicine. Research in veterinary Science. 2008;

423

85, 394-398

424

[20] Lepage O.M., Doumbia A., Perron-Lepage M.F., and Gangl M. The use of maggot debridement

425

therapy in 41 equids. Equine vet. J. 2012; 44, 120-125

426

[21] Sherman R.A., Shapiro C.E., Yang R.M. Maggot Therapy for Problematic Wounds: Uncommon

427

and Off-label Applications. Advances in Skin & Wound Care. 2007; 20, 602-610

428

[22] Morrison S.E. How to Use Sterile Maggot Debridement Therapy for Foot Infections of the Horse.

429

Proc. Am. Ass. equine Practnrs. 2005; 51, 461-464

430

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

412

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Highlights

RI PT

SC M AN U TE D



EP



We describe the potential progression of a ventral midline suppurative incisional wound into a septic peritonitis We describe the novel use of medical grade Phaenicia sericata larvae in the treatment of a multi-drug resistant peritonitis in a horse Medical grade Phaenicia sericata larvae caused no ill effects when placed into the peritoneal cavity

AC C