Accepted Manuscript Phenotype and RNA-seq-Based transcriptome profiling of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in response to tea tree oil Xingchen Zhao, Zonghui Liu, Zuojia Liu, Rizeng Meng, Ce Shi, Xiangrong Chen, Xiujuan Bu, Na Guo PII:
S0882-4010(17)30401-1
DOI:
10.1016/j.micpath.2018.07.027
Reference:
YMPAT 3067
To appear in:
Microbial Pathogenesis
Received Date: 12 April 2017 Revised Date:
6 March 2018
Accepted Date: 20 July 2018
Please cite this article as: Zhao X, Liu Z, Liu Z, Meng R, Shi C, Chen X, Bu X, Guo N, Phenotype and RNA-seq-Based transcriptome profiling of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in response to tea tree oil, Microbial Pathogenesis (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.07.027. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1
Phenotype and RNA-seq-Based transcriptome profiling of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in response
2
to tea tree oil
3
RI PT
4 5
Xingchen Zhaob, Zonghui Liua , Zuojia Liuc, Rizeng Mengd, Ce Shia, Xiangrong Chena, Xiujuan Bu a,
6
Na Guoa#
SC
7
a Department of Food Quality and Safety, College of Food Science and Engineering, Jilin University,
9
130062, China
M AN U
8
b Department of Food Quality and Safety, School of Pharmaceutics and Food Science, Tonghua
11
Normal University, 134000, China
12
c State Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry,
13
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin, China
14
d Jilin Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau, Changchun, 130062, Chinad.
17 18
EP
16
AC C
15
TE D
10
19
#Address correspondence to Na Guo,
[email protected].
20
Xingchen Zhao and Zonghui Liu contributed equally to this work
21
This study depressed phenotype and expression profiles of S. aureus biofilm in the presence of TTO.
22
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ABSTRACT
24
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a Gram-positive bacterium that causes a wide range of diseases,
25
including food poisoning. Tea tree oil (TTO), an essential oil distilled from Melaleuca alternifolia, is
26
well-known for its antibacterial activities. TTO effectively inhibited all 19 tested strains of S. aureus
27
biofilm and planktonic cells. Phenotype analyses of S. aureus biofilm cells exposed to TTO were
28
performed by biofilm adhesion assays, eDNA detection and PIA release. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq)
29
was used in our study to elucidate the mechanism of TTO as a potential antibacterial agent to evaluate
30
differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and the functional network in S. aureus ATCC 29213 biofilms.
31
TTO significantly changed (greater than a 2- or less than a 2-fold change) the expression of 304 genes
32
in S. aureus contained in biofilms. The levels of genes related to the glycine, serine and threonine
33
metabolism pathway, purine metabolism pathway, pyrimidine metabolism pathway and amino acid
34
biosynthesis pathway were dramatically changed in the biofilm exposed to TTO. Furthermore, the
35
expression changes identified by RNA-seq analysis were verified by real-time RT-PCR. To the best of
36
our knowledge, this research is the first study to report the phenotype and expression profiles of S.
37
aureus in biofilms exposed to TTO.
38
Keywords Staphylococcus aureus · Tea tree oil · Biofilm · RNA sequencing
40 41
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
39
RI PT
23
42 43 44
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 45
1. Introduction Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a Gram-positive bacterium, which is considered one of the
47
most important human pathogens [1], and it is one of the major foodborne and iatrogenic pathogens
48
involved in a variety of diseases. A biofilm is a complex matrix produced by microorganisms in which
49
cells bind to each other and link to a biotic or abiotic surface [2]. Antimicrobial resistance has become a
50
highly concerning risk factor for human health worldwide. Microbial biofilms are resistant to
51
antibiotics, and they play a decisive role in some persistent and chronic bacterial infections [3]. It has
52
been reported that biofilms supply bacteria with an effective barrier against host immune cells [4].
53
Bacteria in biofilms are disparate in phenotypic characteristics and gene expression, and they are more
54
resistant to antibiotics than planktonic cells in suspension [5, 6]. Previous studies have reported that
55
staphylococcal biofilms are a type of extracellular polysaccharide substance consisting of
56
polysaccharide intercellular adhesion (PIA), extracellular DNA (eDNA), protein and cellular debris [7].
57
eDNA exists in S. aureus biofilms and provides strength to the biofilm matrix. However, the
58
mechanism of S. aureus biofilm formation is unknown.
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
46
Essential oils (EOs) are antiseptic substances distilled from plants, and interest in EOs has
60
increased in the past few years. EOs can inhibit bacterial growth by targeting the membrane and
61
cytoplasm, and they can change the entire morphology of the cells in some situations [8]. Tea tree oil
62
(TTO) is a type of essential oil obtained from Melaleuca alternifolia. TTO is well known for its
63
effective broad spectrum activities as a topical antibacterial agent. TTO has been reported to inhibit
64
bacteria at 0.002–2% and fungicide at 0.004–0.25%, and it is also an anti-inflammatory agent (≤
65
0.125%) in vitro [9, 10].
66
AC C
EP
59
Transcriptome profiling allows the broad mapping of molecular constituents in cells, leading to
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT hypotheses for the potential mechanisms of physiological and pathological conditions [11]. Over the
68
past decade, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has become a powerful and cost-efficient tool for
69
transcriptome analysis [12], and it has replaced microarrays as the preferred technique for gene
70
expression analysis. In contrast to microarrays, RNA-seq has a larger range and is more sensitive and
71
accurate. RNA-seq has accelerated studies to enhance our comprehension of the complexity of gene
72
expression, regulation and networks [13]. A common purpose of RNA-seq is to identify DEGs between
73
two or more sample groups [12].
SC
RI PT
67
However, to our knowledge, no studies have used RNA-seq technology to elucidate the
75
mechanism of TTO as a potential antibacterial agent to evaluate DEGs and functional network analysis
76
in S. aureus biofilms and planktonic populations. Our study provides insight into the novel genes that
77
may be of vital importance in biofilm formation and the mechanism of TTO effect on S. aureus
78
biofilms and planktonic populations.
79
2. Materials and methods
80
2.1 Bacterial strain and preparation of media
TE D
M AN U
74
S. aureus ATCC 29213 was obtained from the China Medical Culture Collection (CMCC) Center.
82
Eighteen food-borne isolates of S. aureus were obtained from the Jilin Entry and Exit Inspection and
83
Quarantine Bureau. Mueller-Hinton broth II (MHB II) and Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) were
84
purchased from BD (Biosciences, Inc., Sparks, USA). TTO was obtained from Nanjing Chemlin
85
Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). Terpinen-4-ol (35-44 %), ߛ-terpinene (10-28%),
86
ߙ-terpinen (5-13%), terpinolene (1.5-5%) and ߙ-terpineol (1.5–8%) are the main components of
87
components of our TTO sample.
88
2.2 Testing planktonic and biofilm antimicrobial susceptibility
AC C
EP
81
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) analysis was performed in MHB in triplicate via
90
broth microdilution techniques according to Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines [14].
91
The MICs were defined as the lowest antimicrobial concentration that inhibited >90% of growth by
92
visual reading. The minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) were identified as the lowest
93
concentration demonstrating no microbial growth [15].
RI PT
89
Minimum biofilm inhibition concentration (MBIC) analysis was performed as previously
95
described [16]. The MBIC was determined as the lowest concentration to show growth below or equal
96
to that of the control. The minimum biofilm bactericidal concentration (MBBC) was identified as the
97
lowest concentration causing no bacterial growth [15,16].
98
2.3 Biofilm adhesion assays
M AN U
SC
94
Biofilm adhesion was examined via a crystal violet staining assay and confocal laser scanning
100
microscopy (CLSM). The crystal violet staining assay was based on a previously reported method [16].
101
The TTO concentrations tested were 1, 2 and 4 mg/ml. Briefly, a static biofilm assay was performed in
102
96-well plates. Biofilms were covered with crystal violet stain dissolved in cold acetic acid, and
103
measurements at OD595 were recorded.
EP
TE D
99
CLSM was performed as previously reported [16]. A pre-established biofilm was stained with a
105
LIVE/DEAD BacLight Bacterial Viability kit (Invitrogen Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, USA) following
106
the manufacturer’s instructions. CLSM images were captured using an Olympus FV1000 confocal laser
107
scanning microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with a × 40 objective lens. Image analyses and export
108
were performed with FluoView version 1.7.3.0.
109
2.4 Detection of PIA and quantification of eDNA
AC C
104
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Purification and quantification of eDNA release from S. aureus biofilm was conducted as
111
previously described [17]. The concentration and purity of the purified DNA were determined
112
spectrophotometrically by the absorbance ratio of A260/A280 using a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo
113
Scientific, Waltham, USA) after treatment with TTO for 24 h.
RI PT
110
PIA was measured as previously reported [18]. Briefly, S. aureus strains were grown under static
115
conditions at 37 ℃ for 24 h. Cells were then resuspended with 0.5 M EDTA, and proteinase K was then
116
added. Serial dilutions of the PIA extract were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore,
117
Billerica, USA). The membrane was blocked with 3% (w/v) BSA and subsequently stained with wheat
118
germ agglutinin coupled to horseradish peroxidase (WGA–HRP conjugate; Sigma, Saint Louis, USA).
119
The HRP activity was detected by an ECL Plus kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). The same
120
experiments were also performed at 10 and 48 h (data not shown).
121
2.5 Growth curves
TE D
M AN U
SC
114
Growth curves of S. aureus strain ATCC 29213 were generated. Briefly, an isolated S. aureus
123
colony was cultivated in TSB containing 0.25 % glucose (TSB-g) and incubated at 37 ℃. The biofilm
124
cell growth was spectrophotometrically measured by a XTT assay at 540 nm at regular time intervals.
125
2.6 RNA-seq
AC C
126
EP
122
S. aureus biofilm cells were exposed to TTO for 60 min at a concentration of 1/2×MBIC (1
127
mg/ml), and 2 samples and 2 control samples were analyzed. Total RNA was extracted from mature
128
biofilms and planktonic cells using the RNeasy Mini Kit following the manufacturer’s protocol
129
(Cat#74106, Qiagen, German). Total RNA was purified with RNase-free DNase I (Thermo Scientific,
130
Waltham, USA). RNA quality was analyzed using a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa
131
Clara, USA), and RNA was then transformed into TruSeq libraries for sequencing on the Illumina
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT HiSeqX Ten 2*150 bp platform. Briefly, cDNA was synthesized and then subjected to blunt-ending,
133
phosphorylation and addition of a single 3’adenosine moiety and Illumina adapters on the repaired ends.
134
The cDNA cluster was acquired via a cBot User Guide. The cDNA libraries were generated according
135
to the Illumina HiSeqX Ten mRNA-sequencing sample preparation protocol. The sequencing process
136
was controlled by means of Illumina data collection software. Total RNA samples were stored at
137
−70 °C. A total of 5 µg of each RNA sample was sent to Shanghai Biotechnology Corporation
138
(Shanghai, China) for RNA sequencing.
SC
RI PT
132
The resulting high-quality reads were mapped onto the S. aureus strain ATCC 29213 reference
140
genome (accession no. NC_002745.2 and NC_003140.1) using Bowtie2 (version: 2-2.0.5). The
141
Bowtie2 alignments were processed via BED Tools (version: 2.16.1). The assemblies of mapped reads
142
and the calculations of expression values of predicted S. aureus transcripts were represented as
143
fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments (FPKM) [19]. Significant differences in
144
genes were identified with the threshold false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.05 and |fold-change| > 2. These
145
samples were analyzed via target prediction, including Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis and
146
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis for DEGs. The same formula
147
was used for the pathway enrichment analysis with GO and KEGG. The enriched P values of GO and
148
KEGG were calculated according to the hypergeometric test [20]. The parameters for this equation are
149
as follows: N is the number of all genes with a GO/KO annotation; n is the number of DEGs in N; M
150
represents the number of all genes that have been annotated to specific pathways; and m represents the
151
number of DEGs in M. For both GO and KEGG enrichment analyses, we selected a corrected P value
152
< 0.05 as a threshold to determine significant enrichment of the gene sets. Both GO and KEGG of the
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
139
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 153
transcripts were identified trough homemade perl scripts. All the processes discussed above were
154
conducted at Shanghai Biotechnology Corporation.
m N − M i n − i P = 1− ∑ N i =0 n
155
156
RI PT
m −1
2.7 RT-qPCR
The effect of TTO on expression levels of RNA was examined using oligo dT-primers and
158
Superscript II RNAse-Reverse Transcriptase (Takara) to confirm the RNA-seq result. Target gene
159
mRNA expression was quantified using SYBR® Premix Ex Taq II (Takara-Bio, Shiga, Japan). The
160
primer pairs used in quantitative RT-PCR are listed in Table 1. 16S rRNA was used as the mRNA
161
control. Reactions were performed using an ABI Prism 7000 sequence detection system (Applied
162
Biosystems, Nieuwerkerk a/d IJssel, The Netherlands) with the following program: 95 ℃ for 15 s, 60 ℃
163
for 30 s, and 95 ℃ for 15 s.
164
2.8 Statistical analysis
TE D
M AN U
SC
157
The statistical analysis of all of the experiments in our study except the RNA-seq were done as
166
following: Experimental data were analyzed with SPSS software and compared using Student's t-test.
167
The results from quantitative analyses are expressed as the mean ± SD of the data from different
168
independent experiments. Differences with a P value of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
169
All experiments were repeated in triplicate independently.
170
3. Results
171
3.1 Phenotype analysis of S. aureus biofilm cells with TTO treatment
172
AC C
EP
165
The MIC and MBC values for TTO were 1-2 mg/ml (~0.11%-0.22%) and 4-8 mg/ml
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (~0.44%-0.88%), respectively (Table 2). In the biofilms, the MBIC and MBBC values for TTO
174
treatment were 2-4 mg/ml (~0.22%-0.44%) and 32-64 mg/ml (~3.52%-7.05%), respectively (Table 2).
175
The MBBC value was 16-32 times the MBIC value, indicating that the biofilm existed enhanced the
176
resistance to S. aureus. S. aureus ATCC 29213 was selected for the following experiments in this
177
section.
RI PT
173
The inhibition of S. aureus formation by TTO-treated biofilms was tested by the crystal violet
179
staining method. As shown in Fig. 1a, higher concentrations of TTO resulted in lower biofilm masses.
180
Fig. 1B shows that the TTO-treated (2 mg/ml) biofilm biomass was reduced to 25% of the control.
M AN U
SC
178
The viability of the preformed S. aureus biofilms exposed to TTO (1 to 4 mg/ml) was further
182
verified by CLSM analysis. The pre-established biofilms were stained with a LIVE/DEAD BacLight
183
bacterial viability kit and imaged using confocal laser scanning microscopy (Fig. 2). Green
184
fluorescence indicated SYTO-9 staining (live cells), and red fluorescence indicated propidium iodide
185
staining (dead cells). In the control sample, the green fluorescence was strong (Fig. 2A). Treatment of
186
biofilm with 1 mg/ml TTO for 48 h decreased the number of bacteria in the biofilm, which increased
187
the spaces in the biofilm (Fig. 2B). Exposure to 2 mg/ml TTO resulted in more red fluorescence than
188
the 1 mg/ml TTO sample, and treatment with 4 mg/ml TTO increased the red fluorescence even further,
189
indicating the most detrimental effects on S. aureus biofilms (Fig. 2C, D). As expected, S. aureus cells
190
exposed to 4 mg/ml disrupted the biofilm and induced cell death (Fig. 2D).
EP
AC C
191
TE D
181
The amount of eDNA in the cell-free supernatants of the biofilms was measured using a
192
spectrophotometer and was reported as the eDNA per relative biomass to account for the amount of
193
bacteria was present in the biofilms. The average production of eDNA resulting from biofilm exposure
194
to 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 mg/ml TTO decreased to approximately 70%, 60%, 40% and 30%, respectively, of
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT the control (Fig. 3A). Levels of PIA production from biofilms exposed to TTO at
196
different concentrations are shown in Fig. 3B. The inhibition ratio of PIA expression following
197
exposure to 0, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 mg/ml TTO was 30%, 40%, 60% and 80%, respectively, compared to the
198
control. The results showed that there was a significant decrease in eDNA release and PIA production
199
in biofilms treated with TTO compared to the control sample. Thus, the observed reduction in eDNA
200
and PIA production may be the leading factors responsible for decreased biofilm formation.
RI PT
195
To select the optimal TTO concentration to protect against the S. aureus strain for the
202
transcriptional analysis, we generated growth curves for S. aureus ATCC 29213 treated with TTO. The
203
growth of S. aureus ATCC 29213 in biofilms as measured by the XTT assay is shown in Fig. 4. A
204
steady decrease in the optical density of cells treated with TTO at sub-MBBC concentrations (1, 2, 4
205
and 8 mg/ml) was observed versus the control group. The results showed that a strong bacteriostatic
206
action against S. aureus biofilm cells was generated by TTO at low concentrations.
207
3.2 DEGs in biofilm cells treated with TTO
TE D
M AN U
SC
201
To measure the effects of low TTO concentrations on the S. aureus ATCC 29213 strain, we used
209
RNA-seq to test the transcriptional profile of biofilm cells at a sub-MBIC concentration (1/2×MBIC, 1
210
mg/ml) of TTO at the 60 min time point. Total RNA was extracted from each group, transformed into
211
cDNA libraries via Illumina TruSeq Stranded mRNA LT and sequenced using an Illumina HiSeqX Ten
212
platform. The raw reads were filtered by Seqtk software for quality control before mapping to genome
213
by Bowtie2 (version: 2-2.0.5) [21]. HTSeq was employed to count the fragments of genes followed by
214
TMM (trimmed mean of M values) normalization [22]. DEGs were identified as the genes with an
215
FDR ≤ 0.05 and |fold-change| > 2 [23]. After data processing, DEGs with P < 0.05 (after correction for
216
multiple tests) were listed. A total 304 genes were differentially expressed in biofilm cells treated with
AC C
EP
208
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT TTO versus the control group (without TTO treatment) with 104 genes downregulated (≤ -2-fold) and
218
200 genes upregulated (≥ 2-fold) in the biofilm cells (Fig. 5). A complete list of all DEGs from S.
219
aureus ATCC 29213 biofilm cells treated with TTO is shown in Table S1 in the Supplementary
220
Material. The RNA-seq data were submitted to Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession
221
number GSE85787.
222
3.3 Validation of RNA-seq expression by real-time RT-PCR
RI PT
217
To validate the RNA-seq-based transcriptome results, the expression levels of 9 selected genes
224
were examined using real time RT-PCR (Table 3). The expression levels of sarA, icaR and cidA were
225
downregulated, while the expression levels of sspA, lrgA, fnbB, lytM, glpT and msmX were upregulated.
226
Therefore, the results showed that there was no significant difference between real-time RT-PCR and
227
RNA-seq data.
228
3.4 GO enrichment and KEGG pathway analysis
229
GO analysis is considered as an internationally standardized system for classifying gene function, and
230
it provides strictly defined concepts and controlled vocabulary to reveal the gene properties and gene
231
products in any organism [24]. According to the GO classification analysis (Table S2), the 205 DEGs in
232
the TTO-treated biofilm cells versus untreated biofilm cells were classified into three groups as follows:
233
molecular functions, cellular components, and biological processes (Fig. 6). We filtered the genes that
234
were significantly enriched with a P value < 0.05, and the number of significant terms in the GO
235
enrichment was 119.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
223
236
Genes generally cooperate with each other to produce biological function. KEGG pathway
237
analysis was used to provide insights into the biological functions of genes. We found 107 DEGs in
238
KEGG pathways (Table S3) between biofilm cells treated with TTO and untreated biofilm cells.
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Pathways with a P value <0.05 were considered to be significantly enriched and DEGs. Eighteen
240
pathways were significantly enriched in the KEGG analysis, including the phosphotransferase system
241
(PTS); valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis; and butanoate metabolism (Fig. 7). We discuss
242
several of these important pathway genes involved in biofilms in the discussion.
243
Discussion
RI PT
239
TTO has been used to inhibit bacteria in many previous studies [25, 26]. The antimicrobial activity
245
of TTO may be due to terpinen-4-ol, which is the main constituent in TTO [27, 28]. However,
246
ߛ-terpinene and ߙ-terpinen, other minor compounds present in TTO, may also inhibit antibacterial
247
activity by producing a synergistic effect among other components [29]. To date, several studies have
248
investigated the effects of TTO on S. aureus biofilms: For example, Brady et al. [30] suggested that
249
TTO was effective in eradicating biofilm-grown MRSA at a concentration of 5 % which was similar to
250
our study with the MBBC values ranging from 32 mg/ml to 64 mg/ml (~3.52%-7.05%); Kwieciński et
251
al. [31] showed 1% TTO destroyed the biofilm formed by S. aureus 8325-4 and Budzyńska et al. [32]
252
demonstrated that the MBEC (minimal biofilm eradication concentration) of TTO against S. aureus
253
biofilms was 0.78%, which were both a little lower than our study, the differences may due to the
254
different contents and components of TTO.
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
255
SC
244
Cuaron et al. [33] performed a transcriptional profiling experiment (DNA microarrays) with S.
256
aureus (planktonic cells) exposed to a growth inhibitory concentration of TTO, and revealed that TTO
257
challenge led to the down-regulation of genes involved with energy-intensive transcription and
258
translation, and altered the regulation of genes involved with heat shock and cell wall metabolism. In
259
our study, we used RNA-Seq for transcriptome analysis instead of DNA microarrays. Comparing to
260
microarrays, RNA-Seq is very powerful and cost-efficient for transcriptome analysis [34], and it has
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT replaced microarrays as the preferred technique for gene expression analysis. In order to avoid the
262
strain-specific differences to the most extent, we chose S. aureus ATCC 29213 as the standard strain of
263
S. aureus for the experiments. Because that the standard strain was used widely and more stable than
264
the clinical strains from different countries. The repetition of experiment is good and strain variability
265
was lower. In this paper, except the glycine, serine and threonine metabolism pathways, purine
266
metabolism pathway and pyrimidine metabolism pathway, we also discussed the differently expressed
267
genes associated with biofilm contribution.
SC
RI PT
261
The biofilm matrix is a complex mixture of macromolecules that includes exopolysaccharides,
269
proteins and DNA. Our findings suggested that TTO effectively inhibited the release of eDNA and the
270
production of PIA during biofilm formation with increasing concentrations of the drug. In addition, the
271
results of crystal violet staining and CLSM showed that TTO in different concentrations could
272
differently destruct the existing biofilms and inhibit the continuing formation of biofilm. Then, we
273
inferred that TTO could could influence S. aureus biofilm formation by affecting eDNA release and
274
PIA expression. Therefore, DEGs associated with biofilms were analyzed. The sar locus encodes the
275
DNA-binding protein, SarA, which is known to control the production of some matrix adhesion genes,
276
including fnbA (encoding fibronectin binding protein A) and icaRA (encoding coagulase) [35-37]. sarA
277
has a global effect on many S. aureus virulence genes that seem to play a role in biofilm formation. In
278
our study, sarA was downregulated by 1.3-fold. A previous study reported that the expression of sarA is
279
decreased by essential oil extracted from C. obtusa leaves, which results in decreased production of
280
virulence factors in S. aureus [38]. These results were in accordance with our results, suggesting that
281
the inhibition mechanism of TTO on S. aureus may be the same as that for the essential oil extracted
282
from C. obtusa leaves. eDNA, which is released in cell autolysis, is an essential matrix molecule in S.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
268
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT aureus biofilm [39]. The release of DNA is regulated by cid and lrg operons [17, 40]. The cidA gene
284
encodes a murein hydrolase regulator that induces cell lysis in the course of biofilm formation, whereas
285
the lrg operon inhibits cell lysis [41]. In this study, the transcript levels of the positive regulator, cidA,
286
were decreased by 1.5-fold, and the transcript levels of the negative regulator of autolysis, lrgA and
287
lrgB, were markedly increased by 2.9-fold and 3.9-fold, respectively. Although sarA and cidA were
288
downregulated less than 2-fold, the results were validated by the results of real-time RT-PCR, so the
289
results were convinced. We found low concentration of TTO increased the expression of icaA, icaB,
290
icaC and icaD by 7.5, 5.8, 3.9 and 6.8-fold, respectively. The production of the icaADBC operon
291
encoded PIA by S. aureus is one of the most studied mechanisms of biofilm formation, making the ica
292
genes a potential target for biofilm inhibitors [42]. Similar effects were observed by Nuryastuti et al.
293
[43] and Pimentel-Filho Nde et al. [44] when evaluating subinhibitory concentrations of cinnamon oil
294
on the expression of icaA in S. epidermidis and subinhibitory concentrations of bovicin HC5 and nisin
295
on the expression of icaD in S. aureus, respectively. They found that even reducing biofilm formation,
296
cinnamon oil enhanced icaA expression and bovicin HC5, nisin enhanced icaD expression. The
297
different changes of biofilm related genes can provide some evidence on the inhibitory effect of TTO
298
on the biofilm formation of S. aureus, especially on the reduction of TTO in eDNA and PIA production.
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
299
RI PT
283
A comparison of the complete glycine, serine and threonine metabolism pathways between
300
TTO-treated biofilm cells and untreated biofilm cells was performed. The RNA-seq results indicated
301
that 12 genes were differentially expressed. Eleven of these genes (sdrE, SA1003, hlgA, pgm, SA1812,
302
SA1271, sak, SA1813, asd, SA1016, and sbi) were upregulated by more than 2-fold in the biofilm cells
303
treated with TTO compared to the untreated biofilm cells, and 1 of the genes (gpmA) was
304
downregulated. Most of the adhesions secreted by S. aureus are cell wall-anchored proteins and are
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT classified into a single family known as members of microbial surface components recognizing
306
adhesive matrix molecules [45]. The Sdr proteins are encoded by the tandemly arrayed sdrC, sdrD, and
307
sdrE, and they are components of microbial surface-recognizing adhesive matrix molecules. The Sdr
308
proteins also have different effects on S. aureus pathogenicity [46]. The allocation of sdrE has been
309
reported to be general among clinical isolates, and it has been suggested that it likely plays a crucial
310
role during infection [47]. The Sak gene encoding staphylokinase (Sak) is a virulence-related gene that
311
may regulate bacterial invasion into host tissues and may improve bacterial resistance to phagocytosis.
312
Interestingly, Kwiecinski et al. [48] reported that plasmin(ogen)-dependent proteolysis and fibrinolysis
313
can be accelerated by Sak, which in turn prevents bacterial adhesion to surfaces and destroys biofilm
314
matrices, resulting in the collapse of biofilm architecture and bacterial separation. This phenomenon
315
may explain our results. Thus, we can infer that the production of plasmin(ogen)-dependent proteolysis
316
and fibrinolysis in the group treated with TTO was more than that of the untreated group. GpmA, which
317
was down-regulated in this study, may activate the interconversion of 2-phosphoglycerate and
318
3-phosphoglycerate. As a vital enzyme in glycolysis and energy metabolism, GpmA is regarded as a
319
underlying target for novel antibiotics [49].
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
305
The biofilm cells treated with TTO had 10 genes involved in purine metabolism pathway that
321
were differentially expressed. Five (purQ, purC, purL, SA1172, and purK) of these genes were
322
upregulated, and 5 (holB, ureC, nurD, SA0515, and nrdF) of these genes were downregulated.
323
Brugarolas et al. [50] reported that purK is a bacterial enzyme that is an attractive antibacterial drug
324
target. The pathogenesis of staphylococcal infections is multifactorial, and golden pigment is a
325
representative feature of staphylococcal infections. Golden pigment can protect the S. aureus from
326
oxidation-based clearance. Lan et al. stated that S. aureus production of golden pigment can be
AC C
320
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT influenced by metabolic pathways, such as purine biosynthesis. Lan et al. [51] also reported that
328
deactivation of purine biosynthetic genes (purN, purH, purD or purA) may account for the intensive
329
pigmentation. Thus, we can speculate that the upregulation of purQ, purC, purL, and purK in the
330
biofilm cells after treatment with TTO led to attenuated golden pigment. The aerobic class Ib encoded
331
by the S. aureus class Ib RNR nrdIEF is an oxygen-dependent enzyme. The anaerobic class III
332
ribonucleotide reductase encoded by class III RNR nrdDG genes is essential for anaerobic growth. The
333
transcription of class III nrdDG genes is at least 10-fold higher under anaerobic than under aerobic
334
conditions. In contrast, there is no important effect of oxygen concentration on the transcription of class
335
Ib nrdIEF genes[52]. Wu et al. [53] reported that the ∆srrA mutant strain produces less PIA and shows
336
less initial adherence capacity, and their microarray analysis revealed that the srrA mutation influences
337
transcription of 230 genes in the microaerobic case and 51 genes in the oxic case (including nrdDG).
338
Therefore, we inferred that the downregulation of nrdD and nrdF was related to the mechanism of S.
339
aureus biofilm formation.
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
327
The biofilm cells treated with TTO resulted in 8 genes involved in the pyrimidine metabolism
341
pathway to be differentially expressed in biofilms. Five (pyrB, pyrAA, pyrF, pyrC, and pryAB) of these
342
genes were upregulated, and 3 (holB, nrdD, and nrdF) of these genes were downregulated.
343
Uridine-5'-triphosphate disodium salt (UMP), known as the precursor of other pyrimidine nucleotides
344
is encoded by pyrE. Jensen et al. [54] reported that mutations can result in high constitutive expression
345
of pyrE (and of pyrB) under the condition of high cellular uridine monophosphate (UTP)
346
concentrations. The expression of pyrE, pyrB and pyrF is mediated primarily by intracellular UTP and
347
is high when the UTP pool is at a low concentration [55]. However, the pyrC gene encoding
348
dihydroorotase is negatively regulated by CTP and is stimulated by GTP [56]. Dihydroorotase encoded
AC C
EP
340
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT by pyrC is the third enzyme in the bacterial pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway of S. aureus. PyrC has
350
been demonstrated to be essential in S. aureus and is an underlying target for the development of
351
selective antibacterial agents against S. aureus [57]. In the presence of ciprofloxacin, erythromycin and
352
vancomycin, both purine and pyrimidine metabolic pathways are the important affected pathways [58].
353
TTO showed good activity against S. aureus in both biofilm and planktonic cells, and it
354
significantly affected the expression of several genes related to S. aureus biofilm formation. These
355
findings may provide insight into understanding the response mechanisms of S. aureus to TTO, and
356
these results promote additional research on TTO as an antibacterial compound.
357
Acknowledgments
M AN U
SC
RI PT
349
The study was supported by grants from the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No.
359
31271951 and No. 81573448), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2013M530142), the Program
360
for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-13-024) and Natural Science Foundation of
361
Jilin Province (20150101009JC).
362
References
363
[1] Ghosh A, Ricke SC, Almeida G, Gibson KE. Combined Application of Essential Oil Compounds
364
and Bacteriophage to Inhibit Growth of Staphylococcus aureus In Vitro. Curr Microbiol.
366 367
EP
AC C
365
TE D
358
2016;72:426-35.
[2] Bazargani MM, Rohloff J. Antibiofilm activity of essential oils and plant extracts against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli biofilms. Food Control. 2016;61:156-64.
368
[3] Teixeira PC, Leite GM, Domingues RJ, Silva J, Gibbs PA, Ferreira JP. Antimicrobial effects of a
369
microemulsion and a nanoemulsion on enteric and other pathogens and biofilms. Int J Food
370
Microbiol. 2007;118:15-9.
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 371
[4] Lindsay D, von Holy A. Bacterial biofilms within the clinical setting: what healthcare professionals should know. J Hosp Infect. 2006;64:313-25.
372
[5] Ceri H, Olson ME, Stremick C, Read RR, Morck D, Buret A. The Calgary Biofilm Device: new
374
technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms. J Clin
375
Microbiol. 1999;37:1771-6.
RI PT
373
376
[6] Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet. 2001;358:135-8.
377
[7]
I,
Vinogradov
E,
Flahaut
S,
Kogan
G,
Jabbouri
SC
Sadovskaya
S.
Extracellular
carbohydrate-containing polymers of a model biofilm-producing strain, Staphylococcus
379
epidermidis RP62A. Infect Immun. 2005;73:3007-17.
380 381
M AN U
378
[8] Nazzaro F, Fratianni F, De Martino L, Coppola R, De Feo V. Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2013;6:1451-74.
[9] Cross SE, Russell M, Southwell I, Roberts MS. Human skin penetration of the major components
383
of Australian tea tree oil applied in its pure form and as a 20% solution in vitro. European Journal
384
of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2008;69:214-22.
387 388 389 390 391 392
EP
386
[10] Hammer KA, Carson CF, Riley TV. Antifungal activity of the components of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;95:853-60.
AC C
385
TE D
382
[11] Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2009;10:57-63.
[12] Williams CR, Baccarella A, Parrish JZ, Kim CC. Trimming of sequence reads alters RNA-Seq gene expression estimates. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016;17. [13] Ozsolak F, Platt AR, Jones DR, Reifenberger JG, Sass LE, McInerney P, et al. Direct RNA sequencing. Nature. 2009;461:814-U73.
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 393 394
[14] CLSI. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically (8th ed., pp. M7eA8). Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI Approved Standard. 2009. [15] Xing M, Shen, F, Liu L, Chen Z, Guo N, Wang X, Wang W, Zhang K, Wu X, Wang X, Li Y, Sun S,
396
Yu L. Antimicrobial efficacy of the alkaloid harmaline alone and in combination with
397
chlorhexidine digluconate against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus grown in planktonic
398
and biofilm cultures. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2012; 54: 475–482.
RI PT
395
[16] Guo N, Zhao X, Li W, Shi C, Meng R, Liu Z, et al. The synergy of berberine chloride and totarol
400
against Staphylococcus aureus grown in planktonic and biofilm cultures. J Med Microbiol.
401
2015;64:891-900.
M AN U
SC
399
[17] Rice KC, Mann EE, Endres JL, Weiss EC, Cassat JE, Smeltzer MS, et al. The cidA murein
403
hydrolase regulator contributes to DNA release and biofilm development in Staphylococcus
404
aureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:8113-8.
TE D
402
[18] Lou Q, Zhu T, Hu J, Ben H, Yang J, Yu F, et al. Role of the SaeRS two-component regulatory
406
system in Staphylococcus epidermidis autolysis and biofilm formation. BMC Microbiol.
407
2011;11:146.
409 410 411 412 413 414
[19] Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, et al. Transcript
AC C
408
EP
405
assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:511-U174.
[20] Zhang B, Kirov S, Snoddy J. WebGestalt: an integrated system for exploring gene sets in various biological contexts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W741-W8. [21] Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature methods. 2012; 9: 357-359.
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
416 417 418
[22] Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. 2015. HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31: 166-169. [23] Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26: 139-140.
RI PT
415
[24] Xiu L, Fu YB, Deng Y, Shi XJ, Bian ZY, Ruhan A, et al. Deep sequencing-based analysis of gene
420
expression in bovine mammary epithelial cells after Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and
421
Klebsiella pneumoniae infection. Gen Mol Res. 2015;14:16948-65.
SC
419
[25] Goni MG, Tomadoni B, Roura SI, Moreira MR. Effect of Preharvest Application of Chitosan and
423
Tea Tree Essential Oil on Postharvest Evolution of Lettuce Native Microflora and Exogenous
424
Escherichia Coli O157: H7. J Food Saf. 2014;34:353-60.
M AN U
422
[26] Mertas A, Garbusinska A, Szliszka E, Jureczko A, Kowalska M, Krol W. The influence of tea tree
426
oil (Melaleuca alternifolia) on fluconazole activity against fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans
427
strains. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:590470.
430 431 432 433
and other medicinal properties. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19:50-62.
EP
429
[27] Carson CF, Hammer KA, Riley TV. Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil: a review of antimicrobial
[28] Cox SD, Mann CM, Markham JL. Interactions between components of the essential oil of
AC C
428
TE D
425
Melaleuca alternifolia. J Appl Microbiol. 2001;91:492-7.
[29] Marino M, Bersani C, Comi G. Impedance measurements to study the antimicrobial activity of essential oils from Lamiaceae and Compositae. Int J Food Microbiol. 2001;67:187-95.
434
[30] Brady A, Loughlin R, Gilpin D, Kearney P, Tunney M. In vitro activity of tea-tree oil against
435
clinical skin isolates of meticillin-resistant and -sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and
436
coagulase-negative staphylococci growing planktonically and as biofilms. J Med Microbiol. 2006;
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 437
55: 1375-80. [31] Kwieciński J, Eick S, Wójcik K. Effects of tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) oil on Staphylococcus
439
aureus in biofilms and stationary growth phase. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009; 33(4): 343-7.
440
[32] Budzyńska A, Wieckowska-Szakiel M, Sadowska B, Kalemba D, Rózalska B. Antibiofilm
441
Activity of Selected Plant Essential Oils and their Major Components. Pol J Microbiol. 2011;
442
60(1): 35-41.
RI PT
438
[33] Cuaron JA, Dulal S, Song Y, Singh AK, Montelongo CE, Yu W, Nagarajan V, Jayaswal RK,
444
Wilkinson BJ, Gustafson JE. Tea Tree Oil-Induced Transcriptional Alterations in Staphylococcus
445
aureus. Phytother Res. 2013; 27(3): 390-396.
447
M AN U
446
SC
443
[34] Williams CR, Baccarella A, Parrish JZ, Kim CC. Trimming of sequence reads alters RNA-Seq gene expression estimates. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016; 17: 103.
[35] Arya R, Ravikumar R, Santhosh RS, Princy SA. SarA based novel therapeutic candidate against
449
Staphylococcus aureus associated with vascular graft infections. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:416.
450
[36] Fuda CCS, Fisher JF, Mobashery S. beta-Lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: the adaptive
453 454
EP
452
resistance of a plastic genome. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005;62:2617-33. [37] Kupferwasser LI, Yeaman MR, Nast CC, Kupferwasser D, Xiong YQ, Palma M, et al. Salicylic
AC C
451
TE D
448
acid attenuates virulence in endovascular infections by targeting global regulatory pathways in Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:222-33.
455
[38] Kim ES, Kang SY, Kim YH, Lee YE, Choi NY, You YO, et al. Chamaecyparis obtusa Essential Oil
456
Inhibits Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Formation and Expression of
457
Virulence Factors. J Med Food. 2015;18:810-7.
458
[39] Otto M. Staphylococcal Infections: Mechanisms of Biofilm Maturation and Detachment as Critical
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 459
Determinants of Pathogenicity. Annual Review of Medicine, Vol 64. 2013;64:175-88. [40] Shen F, Tang X, Wang Y, Yang Z, Shi X, Wang C, et al. Phenotype and expression profile analysis
461
of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms and planktonic cells in response to licochalcone A. Appl
462
Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99:359-73.
463 464
RI PT
460
[41] Sadykov MR, Bayles KW. The control of death and lysis in staphylococcal biofilms: a coordination of physiological signals. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2012;15:211-5.
[42] Oduwole KO, Glynn AA, Molony DC, Murray D, Rowe S, Holland LM, McCormack DJ, O'Gara
466
JP. Anti-biofilm activity of sub-inhibitory povidone-iodine concentrations against Staphylococcus
467
epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus. J Orthop Res. 2010; 28, 1252-1256.
M AN U
SC
465
[43] Nuryastuti T, van derMei HC, Busscher HJ, Iravati S, Aman AT, Krom BP. Effect of cinnamon oil
469
on icaA expression and biofilm formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Appl Environ Microbiol.
470
2009; 75: 6850-6855.
TE D
468
[44] Pimentel-Filho Nde J, Martins MC, Nogueira GB, Mantovani HC, Vanetti MC. Bovicin HC5 and
472
nisin reduce Staphylococcus aureus adhesion to polystyrene and change the hydrophobicity profile
473
and Gibbs free energy of adhesion. Int J Food Microbiol. 2014; 190: 1-8.
475 476
[45] Liu HL, Lv JN, Qi XQ, Ding Y, Li D, Hu LH, et al. The carriage of the serine-aspartate repeat
AC C
474
EP
471
protein-encoding sdr genes among Staphylococcus aureus lineages. Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2015;19:498-502.
477
[46] Josefsson E, McCrea KW, Ni Eidhin D, O'Connell D, Cox J, Hook M, et al. Three new members
478
of the serine-aspartate repeat protein multigene family of Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiology.
479
1998;144 ( Pt 12):3387-95.
480
[47] Hair PS, Foley CK, Krishna NK, Nyalwidhe JO, Geoghegan JA, Foster TJ, et al. Complement
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 481
regulator C4BP binds to Staphylococcus aureus surface proteins SdrE and Bbp inhibiting bacterial
482
opsonization and killing. Results Immunol. 2013;3:114-21. [48] Kwiecinski J, Peetermans M, Liesenborghs L, Na ML, Bjornsdottir H, Zhu XF, et al.
484
Staphylokinase Control of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Formation and Detachment Through
485
Host Plasminogen Activation. J Infect Dis. 2016;213:139-48.
RI PT
483
[49] Davies DR, Staker BL, Abendroth JA, Edwards TE, Hartley R, Leonard J, et al. An ensemble of
487
structures of Burkholderia pseudomallei 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate-dependent phosphoglycerate
488
mutase. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun. 2011;67:1044-50.
M AN U
SC
486
[50] Brugarolas P, Duguid EM, Zhang W, Poor CB, He C. Structural and biochemical characterization
490
of N5-carboxyaminoimidazole ribonucleotide synthetase and N5-carboxyaminoimidazole
491
ribonucleotide mutase from Staphylococcus aureus. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr.
492
2011;67:707-15.
493 494
TE D
489
[51] Lan L, Cheng A, Dunman PM, Missiakas D, He C. Golden pigment production and virulence gene expression are affected by metabolisms in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 2010;192:3068-77. [52] Masalha M, Borovok I, Schreiber R, Aharonowitz Y, Cohen G. Analysis of transcription of the
496
Staphylococcus aureus aerobic class Ib and anaerobic class III ribonucleotide reductase genes in
AC C
497
EP
495
response to oxygen. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:7260-72.
498
[53] Wu YC, Wu Y, Zhu T, Han HY, Liu HY, Xu T, et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis SrrAB Regulates
499
Bacterial Growth and Biofilm Formation Differently under Oxic and Microaerobic Conditions. J
500
Bacteriol. 2015;197:459-76.
501
[54] Kaj Frank Jensen, Jan Neuhard, Schack L. RNA polymerase involvement in the regulation of
502
expression of Salmonella typhimurium pyr genes. Isolation and characterization of a
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 503
fluorouracil-resistant mutant with high, constitutive expression of the pyrB and pyrE genes due to
504
a mutation in rpoBC. The EMBO Joumal. 1982;1:69-74. [55] Peter Poulsen, Fons Bonekamp, Jensen KF. Structure of the Escherichia coli pyrE operon and
506
control of pyrE expression by a UTP modulated intercistronic attentuation. The EMIBO Journal.
507
1984;3:1783-90.
509
[56] Sorensen KI, Neuhard J. Dual transcriptional initiation sites from the pyrC promoter control expression of the gene in Salmonella typhimurium. Mol Gen Genet. 1991;225:249-56.
SC
508
RI PT
505
[57] Truong L, Hevener KE, Rice AJ, Patel K, Johnson ME, Lee H. High-level expression, purification,
511
and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus dihydroorotase (PyrC) as a cleavable His-SUMO
512
fusion. Protein Expression Purif. 2013;88:98-106.
[58] Dorries K, Schlueter R, Lalk M. Impact of Antibiotics with Various Target Sites on the Metabolome
515
2014;58:7151-63.
Staphylococcus
aureus.
AC C
516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533
of
EP
514
TE D
513
M AN U
510
24
Antimicrobial
Agents
and
Chemotherapy.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 1 Primers used in real-time RT-PCR with SYBR green probes Primer
Sequence (5'-3')
16S rRNA
16S rRNAfor
CGTGCTACAATGGACAATACAAA
16S rRNArev
ATCTACGATTACTAGCGATTCCA
sarA for
TCTTGTTAATGCACAACAACGTAA
sarA rev
TGTTTGCTTCAGTGATTCGTTT
icaR for
CAATAATCTAATACGCCTGAG
icaR rev
AGTAGCGAATACACTTCATCT
sspA for
CGATCGTCACCAAATCACAGA
sspA rev
TGCGTAGCATCTACGACGTGT
cidA for
CTTAGCCGGCAGTATTGTTGC
cidA rev
TGAAGATAATGCAACGATAC
sarA icaR sspA cidA
fnbB
GTGACATAGCCAGTACAAAT
fnbB rev
AACTTGGAAAAATGGCGTTG
lytMfor
ACGGTGTCGACTATGCAATGC
lytMrev
TACTTGATTGCCGCCACCA
glpTfor
CGACTTTGCTACAAGCGATAA
glpTrev
CGCCCAATCAAGTACACCA
msmXfor
CATTTGGGCTAAAGCTACG
msmXrev
GACGCTGTCCACCAGATAA
TE D EP
AC C
538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554
lrgA rev
TTCTGCATGACCTTCTGCA
glpT
537
CTGGTGCTGTTAAGTTAGGCG
fnbB for
lytM
msmX
lrgA for
M AN U
lrgA
RI PT
Target gene
SC
534 535 536
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 555
Table 2 Antimicrobial activities of TTO against 19 S. aureus strains growing in planktonic and biofilm. Planktonic
MIC
MBC
(mg/ml)
S.aureus JL-20110
1 (1)
2(2)
S.aureus JL-20111
1 (1)
2(2)
S.aureus JL-20112
1 (1)
2(2-4)
S.aureus JL-20113
2 (1-2)
2(2)
S.aureus JL-20114
1 (1)
2(2)
S.aureus JL-20115
1 (1)
2(2)
S.aureus JL-20116
1 (1)
2(2-4)
S.aureus JL-20117
2 (1-2)
S.aureus JL-20118
MBIC
(mg/ml) MBBC
2(2)
(mg/ml)
64(64) 64(64)
2 (2)
32(32)
4 (4)
64(64)
2 (2-4)
32(32-64)
2 (2)
32(32)
2 (2)
32(32)
4(4)
2 (2-4)
64(32-64)
2 (1-2)
2(2)
2 (2)
64(64)
S.aureus JL-20119
1 (1)
2(2)
2 (2)
32(32)
S.aureus JL-20120
2 (1-2)
2(2-4)
2 (2)
32(32)
S.aureus JL-20121
1 (1)
2(2)
2(2)
32(32-64)
2 (1-2)
2(2)
4 (2-4)
32(32)
1 (1)
2(2)
2 (2)
32(32)
1 (1)
2(2)
4 (4)
32(32)
S.aureus JL-20125
1 (1)
2(2-4)
2 (2)
64(64)
S.aureus JL-20126
1 (1)
2(2)
2 (2)
32(32-64)
S.aureus JL-20127
1 (1)
2(2)
2 (2)
64(64)
S.aureus ATCC 29213
1 (1)
2(2)
2 (2)
32(32)
AC C
EP
S.aureus JL-20124
M AN U
TE D
S.aureus JL-20123
SC
2 (2)
S.aureus JL-20122
556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563
(mg/ml)
RI PT
Strains
Biofilm
Values in the brackets represent the range of MIC (MBC, MBIC and MBBC) for TTO.
26
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 564 565 566
Table 3 Selected S. aureus genes that displayed altered expression after TTO treatment of biofilm as determined by microarray analysis and real-time RT–PCR. Fold change± SD Gene
Description
sarA icaR
RNA-seq
transcriptional regulator
-1.5±0.1
-1.3±0.1
biofilm operon icaADBC HTH-type
-2.8±1.1
-2.0±0.8
negative transcriptional regulator IcaR
glutamyl endopeptidase
+2.7±0.5
+2.5±0.3
cidA
riboflavin biosynthesis protein
-1.8±0.3
-1.5±0.2
lrgA
elastin binding protein
+3.0±0.8
+2.9±0.6
fnbB
fibronectin-binding protein A
+2.9±0.6
+2.5±0.5
lytM
glycyl-glycine endopeptidase LytM
+2.6±0.5
+2.5±0.4
glpT
glycerol-3-phosphate transporter
+5.8±1.5
+5.2±1.2
msmX
sugar ABC transporter ATP-binding protein
+44.0±3.7
+39.0±2.9
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
sspA
AC C
567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590
RI PT
RT-PCR
27
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 591 592 593 594 (A)
Control
1mg/ml
2mg/ml
4mg/ml
RI PT
595 596 597
SC
598 599 (B)
600
602
2.5 Biofilm(A595)
601
M AN U
3
*
2 1.5 1
**
0
604
TE D
603
0.5
Control
1
2
**
4
605 606
EP
Concentration of of TTO(mg/mL) Concertration TTO (mg/ml)
Fig. 1. Effect of TTO on S. aureus biofilm formation determined by crystal violet staining. Bars
608
indicate the mean A595 values of three independent experiments, and experiments were performed in
609
triplicate wells. Values are expressed as the means ± standard deviations; * P<0.05, ** P<0.01.
610
AC C
607
611 612 613
28
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 614 615
618
AC C
617
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
616
619
Fig. 2. CLSM image of LIVE/DEAD stained S. aureus biofilms grown on coverslips. Green (viable
620
cells) and red (dead cells). (A) Control cells (no treated). (B) Cells treated with TTO (1 mg/ml). (C)
621
Cells treated with TTO (2 mg/ml). (D) Cells treated with TTO (4 mg/ml).
622 623
29
624
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Fig. 3. (A) Effect of eDNA release on S. aureus ATCC 29213. The amount of eDNA in the cell-free
626
supernatants from S. aureus biofilms treated with different concentrations of TTO was measured by
627
spectrophotometry after 24 h. The values are expressed as nanograms of eDNA per relative biofilm
628
biomass (OD600). (B) Effect of TTO on PIA production by S. aureus ATCC 29213. PIA in cultures
629
treated with different concentrations of TTO was extracted from the biofilms after 24 h and detected
630
using WAG-HRP. The spot was visualized by chemiluminescence detection. Values are expressed as
631
the means ± standard deviations; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01.
AC C
625
30
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 632 633 634
M AN U
SC
RI PT
635
636
640 641 642 643 644
TE D
639
EP
638
Fig. 4. Growth curve for S. aureus ATCC 29213 in biofilms treated with TTO.
AC C
637
645 646 647
31
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 648 649 650
RI PT
651 652
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
653
AC C
654 655
Fig. 5. The volcano plot of DEGs in biofilm cells treated with TTO versus the control group (without
656
TTO treatment). The results showed that 304 genes were differentially expressed with 104
657
downregulated genes (≤ -2-fold, FDR ≤ 0.05) and 200 upregulated genes (≥ 2-fold, FDR ≤ 0.05) in
658
biofilm cells.
659 660 661
32
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
M AN U
SC
RI PT
662
663 664
Fig. 6. Bar plot of GO enrichment results. The number of significant terms in GO enrichment was 119.
668 669 670 671 672 673 674
EP
667
AC C
666
TE D
665
675 676 677 678
33
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 679 680 681 682
686 687 688 689 690
Fig. 7. Bar plot of KEGG enrichment results. The number of significant pathways in KEGG
EP
685
enrichment was 18.
AC C
684
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
683
34
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights 1. The inhibitory effect of TTO on S. aureus biofilms was determined 2. 304 genes were differentially expressed treated with TTO versus the control biofilm
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
3. GO enrichment and KEGG pathway analysis were provided by RNA-seq