Journal of Non-CrystallineSolids 77 & 78 (1985)999-1002 North-Holland, Amsterdam
999
PHOTOEMISSION STUDIES OF a-SiNx:H/a-Si:H HETEROJUNCTIONS C. COLUZZA, P. PERFETTI~*
G. FORTUNATO*,
C. QUARESIMA**,
M. CAPOZI**,
and
Dipartimento di F i s i c a , Univ. di Roma, P.le A. Moro 2, 00185 Roma * I.E.S.S.-CNR, Via Cineto Romano 42, 00156 Roma ** I.S.M.-CNR, Via E. Fermi 28, 00044 F r a s c a t i , Roma Samples at d i f f e r e n t nitrogen concentrations were produced by ion-bombardment of the substrate - in presence of d i f f e r e n t ammonia pressures in the experimental chamber - during the deposition of the amorphous s i l i c o n or by external Glow-Discharge. For a-SiNx:H at low nitrogen content (semiconducting substrates) no valence bands d i s c o n t i n u i t y was observed w i t h i n the experimental accuracy (0.15 eV) while for the near s t o i c h i o m e t r i c nitrogen content ( i n s u l a t i n g substrates) the d i s c o n t i n u i t y was l a r g e r than 1.2 eV. I . INTRODUCTION The i n t e r e s t of comparing results for s i n g l e - c r y s t a l phous
interfaces
has
and
detectors 3.
In
eg.,
superstructures i
solar
c e l l s 2 and
p a r t i c u l a r heterojunctions between wide gap amor-
phous semiconductors (a-SiNx:H or a-Sil_xCx:H) and a-Si:H are of great tance
for
amor-
been stimulated by the recent development of promising
amorphous h e t e r o j u n c t i o n devices, chemical
interfaces
impor-
the possible blocking e f f e c t s on electrons at the p-i i n t e r f a c e in
p - i - n solar c e l l s 4 or for the charge confinement in superstructures.
On these
heterojunctions an i n t e r e s t i n g information is the valence band d i s c o n t i n u i t y . Photoemission spectroscopy is a most r e l i a b l e technique to i n v e s t i g a t e understand
the
interface
parameters
in
semiconductor
Valence band d i s c o n t i n u i t y ( a E v ) can be measured d i r e c t l y by growing o v e r l a y e r of a semiconductor on the other one:
and
heterojunctions 5. a
thin
AEvis obtained by the d i f f e r -
ence between the e x t r a p o l a t i o n to zero of the two leading edges (see F i g . I ) . 2. EXPERIMENTAL The s i l i c o n - n i t r o g e n a l l o y s were prepared both by RF glow-discharge capacitive
techniques, a d i f f e r e n t
concentration in the a l l o y s . were ion
a
reactor in SiH 4 +NH3 atmosphere, and in s i t u by evaporation of Si
in presence of ammonia bombardment by an ion gun, focused on the sample. both
in
obtained
by
bombardment.
using
For
ammonia p a r t i a l pressure gave d i f f e r e n t nitrogen The hydrogenated
amorphous
silicon
overlayers
the same evaporation set-up in presence of hydrogen
Photoemission data were obtained at the Synchrotron Radia-
0022-3093[85/$03.30 © Elsevier Science Pubfishe~ B.V. (No~h-HoUandPhyficsPubfishing Division)
1000
C Coluzza et aL / Photoemission studies
tion f a c i l i t y of Frascati National Laboratory. Photoemission spectra of the valence bands were taken at photon energy of 60 eV and 40 eV, with a total resolution of 0.6 eV and 0.2 eV respectively. The energy distribution a-SiNx:H/a-Si:H
for
ported in Fig. the
in-situ
curves (EDC's) of
the
valence band of
the
x=1.5 at hu =40 eV and hu =60 eV heterojunctions are re-
2 and in Fig.
3.
The bottom spectrum is the valence band of
grown a-SiNx:H. The N concentration was estimated by Auger ana-
l y s i s . The other curves obtained for thin amorphous silicon films of increasing thickness are shifted of respect to each other.
0.6 eV to align the nitrogen 2s core levels with
These corrections are necessary to compensate possible
band bending and charging effects.
This procedure is j u s t i f i e d by a consis-
tent shift of the nitrogen lone-pair emission peaked at ergy
(peak A of Ref. 6).
valence band discontinuity ( the
~-2 eV of binding en-
A linear estrapolation of the valence band gives a A Ev ) of 1.2 ± 0.15 eV in good agreement with
v a l u e reported by Abeles et al. 7 , and with that predicted by K~rcher et
al. 6
11"•
N(E}
ol
EDC h~ :60 eV
o-SaN~sH/o-Si H
d(il 35 /
Ec,
z
~Ec
15
2
5 .........
F..f
L_ ~ _
AEv : . Semiconductor 1 IS~N x )
.
Ev~
.
.
.
.
.
.
2L
-16
Ei
-8
{eV)
~ Semiconductor 2
FIGURE I
FIGURE 2
O-V~
j
0
C Coluzza et al.
/Photoemission studies
We note the absence of any double edge in the VB
for
1001
intermediate
coverages
as one has to expect for abrupt h e t e r o j u n c t i o n s . This means t h a t a probable i n t e r m i x i n g occurs at low level of that
a
a-Si:H. tion
residual To f i t
of
the
NH3 in
the
chamber
the observed valance bands we t r i e d to use a
or
layers of
linear
combina-
a-Si:H (top curve) and a-SiNx:H (bottom curve) spectra with the
weighting f a c t o r s and energy s h i f t s as a d j u s t a b l e procedure
coverage
could contaminate the f i r s t
described
in Ref.
7:
parameters,
according
the
the r e s u l t i n g curve is q u i t e d i f f e r e n t
from
the i n t e r m e d i a t e one f u r t h e r supporting the hypotesis of i n t e r m i x i n g . To show the dependence of strate
of
a-SiN×:H
with
~ E v on the N concentration we have used a different
value
of
x(x=O.4).
This
glow-discharge grown and a f t e r a soft cleaning by Ar s p u t t e r i n g at Ar
partial
analysis. ined
pressure of
in
~lO-5mbar, the N concentration was estimated by Auger obta-
d e e p - p r o f i l i n g ESCA measurements performed on a s i m i l a r sample grown
at the same time. between
was
200 eV
The in s i t u determinated x value agrees q u i t e well with t h a t
by
surface
surface. hu =40 eV.
In Fig. The
This bombardement, i f doesn't
cause
a
strong
4
are
shown the
spectra
obtained
with
photon
energy
low nitrogen content is c o n s i s t e n t with the low i n t e n s i t y of
EDC ED[
difference
and bulk N c o n c e n t r a t i o n , could decrease the H amount in the
the nitrogen induced peak at the top of the valence band in the 6 trum h~=~O eV
bottom h~=~O eV
dIi) ~'~
35
28
Z
Z
~
15
,.
,P .
-16 - 8 Ei (eV) FIGURE 3
spec-
o-SiN~, H/Q-S, H a- St NI~ H/o-SL
-24
sub-
film
O~V~
.
.
.
.
.
-2~
.
-16 -8 Ei (eV) FIGURE 4
0
O~V~
C Co~zza etaL /Photoemiss~n studies
1002
We have used the above procedure to align the valence bands of the yers
and
as
uncertainty.
a result we f i n d , in t h i s case,
The energy gap Eg in a-SiNx:H varies with x from 1.7-1.8 eV
x=O to 3.9 eV in a-SiNo.7:H. near 8 for
until
value;
0.4
and
the
for
This dependence, however, is far from being l i -
In effect the value of E9 is slowly varying (from 1.8 eV to
x
overla-
AEv=O within the experimental
2.3 eV)
largest v a r i a t i o n occurs for x greater than that
for x=O.4 the 0.5 eV gap difference between a-SiN x
:H and
a-Si:H
is
completely accomodated by the conduction band d i s c o n t i n u i t y . CONCLUSIONS I t is well known that the e f f i c i e n c y of thin f i l m solar c e l l s and ticular
par-
of amorphous s i l i c o n c e l l s can be increased by heterostructures using
wide gap semiconductors as window 2. this
in
Photoemission data are able
to
explain
phenomenon, by revealing that the conduction band d i s c o n t i n u i t y prevents
the back-diffusion of the photoexcited achieved
electrons.
This
result
is
usually
by using the frontal heterojunction a-Sil_xCx:H/a-Si:H but our meas-
urements have shown that the structure a-SiNx:H/a-Si:H could produce the effect
i f x~0.4.
same
Increasing the N concentration i t is also possible to modu-
late the band d i s c o n t i n u i t i e s according to any device necessity. REFERENCES i)
B.Abeles and T.Tiedje, Phys.
2)
Y.Tawada, H.Okamoto and Y.Hamakawa, Appl.
Rev.
Lett.
3)
A.D'Amico, G.Fortunato, G.Petrocco and C.Coluzza, Appl. 964 (1983)
4)
F.Evangelisti, P.Fiorini, C.Giovannella, F.Patella, P.Perfetti, C.Quaresima and M.Capozi, Appl. Phys. Letters 44, 764 (1984)
5)
G.Margaritondo, Soi.
6)
R.Karcher, L.Ley and R.L.Johnson, Phys.
7)
B.Abeles, I,Wagner, W.Eberhardt, J.Stohr, H.Stasiewski and F.Sette, Proc. Int. Conf. on "Optical Effects in Amorphous Semiconductors", Snowbird, Utah (1984)
8)
D. d e l l a Sala, C.Coluzza, G.Fortunato and F . E v a n g e l i s t i , 11th I n t . on Amorphous and Liquid Semiconductor, Rome (September 1985)
State Electron.
51, 2003 (1983) Phys.
Lett.
39, 237 (1981) Phys.
Lett.
42,
26, 499 (1983) Rev.
B 30, 1896 (1984)
Conf.