- Email: [email protected]
Photoperiod Differentially Regulates Circadian Oscillators in Central and Peripheral Tissues of the Syrian Hamster
Current Biology, Vol. 13, 2124, December 2, 2003, 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2003.11.024
Erratum Photoperiod Differentially Regulates Circadian Oscillators in Central and Peripheral Tissues of the Syrian Hamster Amanda-Jayne F. Carr, Jonathan D. Johnston, Andrei G. Semikhodskii, Tania Nolan, Felino R.A. Cagampang, J. Anne Stirland, and Andrew S.I. Loudon
In the Report by Carr et al. (Current Biology 13, pp. 1543–1548), the authors stated that in Figure 3, there was a significant effect of time on short days (SD in the Figure) for the gene Dbp (i.e., bottom row of graphs, second from left). This is incorrect, and there was no influence of time on the ANOVA. For SD and SD-R, the level of significance was 0.05 for the effect of time, as was the effect of photoperiod, not 0.01 as stated. These alterations do not alter the primary conclusions of the paper. The authors regret the error.
Erratum Photoperiod Differentially Regulates Circadian Oscillators in Central and Peripheral Tissues of the Syrian Hamster Amanda-Jayne F. Carr, Jonathan D. Johnston, Andrei G. Semikhodskii, Tania Nolan, Felino R.A. Cagampang, J. Anne Stirland, and Andrew S.I. Loudon
In the Report by Carr et al. (Current Biology 13, pp. 1543–1548), the authors stated that in Figure 3, there was a significant effect of time on short days (SD in the Figure) for the gene Dbp (i.e., bottom row of graphs, second from left). This is incorrect, and there was no influence of time on the ANOVA. For SD and SD-R, the level of significance was 0.05 for the effect of time, as was the effect of photoperiod, not 0.01 as stated. These alterations do not alter the primary conclusions of the paper. The authors regret the error.