Physicochemical and rheological properties of cross-linked inulin with different degree of polymerization

Physicochemical and rheological properties of cross-linked inulin with different degree of polymerization

Accepted Manuscript Physicochemical and rheological properties of cross-linked inulin with different degree of polymerization Yao Li, Xiaohan Ma, Xion...

5MB Sizes 0 Downloads 16 Views

Accepted Manuscript Physicochemical and rheological properties of cross-linked inulin with different degree of polymerization Yao Li, Xiaohan Ma, Xiong Liu PII:

S0268-005X(18)31606-0

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.11.026

Reference:

FOOHYD 4767

To appear in:

Food Hydrocolloids

Received Date: 22 August 2018 Revised Date:

15 October 2018

Accepted Date: 12 November 2018

Please cite this article as: Li, Y., Ma, X., Liu, X., Physicochemical and rheological properties of cross-linked inulin with different degree of polymerization, Food Hydrocolloids (2018), doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.11.026. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Physicochemical and rheological properties of cross-linked inulin

2

with different degree of polymerization

3

Yao Li, Xiaohan Ma, Xiong Liu*

RI PT

1

4

College of Food Science, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China

SC

5

* Corresponding author: Xiong Liu

7

Address: No. 2 Tiansheng Road, Beibei District, Chongqing, 400715, P. R. China

8

Tel: +86-23-68250375

9

Fax: +86-23-68251947

TE D

EP

11

E-mail: [email protected] (X. Liu)

AC C

10

M AN U

6

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abstract: Long-chain inulin (L-In) and short-chain inulin (S-In) from native inulin

13

was separated through the method of alcohol precipitation. Cross-linked inulin with

14

two different degree of polymerization (average DP = 6.88 and 15.10) were prepared

15

in aqueous solutions by using the L-In and S-In respectively as raw material and

16

sodium hexametaphosphate as cross-linker. Structural characteristics of cross-linked

17

inulin were determined by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and scanning

18

electron microscopy. Compared with native L-In and S-In, cross-linked inulin had a

19

higher intrinsic viscosity, stronger stability and moisture absorption capability, but

20

lower water solubility. Only 1% reducing sugar produced when cross-linked inulin

21

was heated within 100 °C, and inulin hydrolysis occurred in acidic environment (pH <

22

6). Rheological properties of inulin dispersions with different degree of

23

polymerization were investigated and compared. The viscoelastic properties of steady

24

shear measurements indicated that cross-linked inulin dispersions presented

25

shear-thinning behaviors, which could be described by a power law model with

26

determination coefficients (R2 = 0.9312~0.9926). The viscoelastic properties of

27

dynamic frequency sweep measurements indicated that cross-linked inulin dispersion

28

showed more solid viscoelastic properties than corresponding native inulin

29

dispersions.

30

Keywords: cross-linked; inulin; polymerization degree; physicochemical property;

31

rheological property.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

12

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 32

1. Introduction Prebiotics are substrates selectively utilized by host microorganisms conferring a

34

health benefit (Gibson et al., 2017). Inulin, known as a rising attractive prebiotic, is

35

composed of D-furan fructose units and one terminal glucose unit, exhibiting many

36

beneficial physiological functions, such as antioxidant activity, ability to improve

37

colonic microbiota, promote mineral absorption, regulate blood glucose and blood

38

lipids (Balthazar et al., 2018a; Shoaib et al., 2016). Ranging from 2 to 60

39

monosaccharide units, the degree of polymerization (DP) of natural inulin have an

40

effect on the physicochemical properties of inulin (Barclay, Ginicmarkovic, Cooper,

41

& Petrovsky, 2010). Generally, short-chain inulin can contribute to an improved

42

mouth feel due to good solubility and mild sweetness, and long-chain inulin can act as

43

fat replacer or texture modifier due to its poor solubility and good viscosity stability.

44

Based on nutritional and physicochemical properties, inulin has been widely used in

45

an increasing number of applications throughout the food production. The prebiotic

46

inulin have proven to be a promising fat substitute and to improve the functional

47

potential in sheep milk ice cream formulation (Balthazar et al., 2017; Balthazar et al.,

48

2018b); the use of inulin could be used for prebiotic in the formulation of whey

49

beverage (Guimaraes et al., 2018a). Besides, the use of inulin for prebiotic in

50

probiotic yogurt could enhance the viability of lactobacillus during storage (Canbulat

51

& Ozcan, 2015).

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

33

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT However, native inulin may induce a disadvantageous rapid renal excretion due to

53

its low molecular weights (Mw). Cross-linking of inulin to enhance its Mw is a

54

strategy to avoid this disadvantage (Li, Hu, Chen, Zheng, Liu, & Ma, et al. 2010).

55

Currently, there have been some reports on the synthesis methods of cross-linked

56

inulin. For example, García synthesized cross-linked inulin using phosphoryl chloride

57

as the cross-linker under alkaline condition (García, Vergara, & Robert, 2015); the

58

cross-linked inulin was prepared by Li’s method using epichlorohydrin as the

59

cross-linker to conjoin inulin molecules (Li et al., 2010); on the other hand, Vervoort

60

synthesized cross-linked inulin with glycidyl methacrylate to introduce double bonds

61

in a radical polymerization (Vervoort et al., 1997). These present methods for

62

preparation of cross-linked inulin feature various disadvantages, such as long

63

preparation time, high toxicity of cross-linker and violent reaction conditions.

64

Therefore, a novel method for cross-linked inulin with advantages, such as gentle

65

reaction condition, time saving, absence of side-effect and simple operation is

66

desirable. Moreover, in those reported works, native inulin (a mixture of long-chain

67

and short-chain inulin) was cross-linked immediately without classification before

68

crosslinking, resulting in the variable DP of cross-linked inulin leading to weak

69

compatibility and instability. Therefore, systematic research on physicochemical and

70

rheological properties of cross-linked inulin with different DP is lacking which limit

71

the deeper-level analysis and application of inulin in the food production.

72

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

52

This study aimed to develop a commercially novel method for preparation of 4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT cross-linked inulin for potential industrial application and to evaluate the

74

physicochemical and rheological properties of cross-linked inulin with different DP.

75

2. Materials and methods

76

2.1. Materials

RI PT

73

Native inulin (average DP < 10) was supplied by Xi’an Ruiling Technology Co.,

78

Ltd. (Xi’an, China). Anhydrous ethanol, sodium hexametaphosphate (SH), anhydrous

79

sodium carbonate, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, hydroquinone, standard

80

polyethylene glycols, 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid and phenol were purchased from

81

Kelong Chemical Reagent Factory (Chengdu, China). All reagents were of analytical

82

grade.

83

2.2 Preparation of cross-linked inulin

TE D

M AN U

SC

77

16 g of native inulin was added to 80 mL distilled water at room temperature and

85

gently stirred until dissolved. Then 20 mL of anhydrous ethanol was added into the

86

solution. The mixture solution was stored at 4 °C for 24 hours. Then sediment and

87

liquid supernatant were separated by centrifugation. After lyophilizing for sediment,

88

long-chain inulin (L-In) in native inulin was obtained. After condensation and

89

lyophilizing for liquid supernatant, short chain inulin (S-In) were obtained.

AC C

EP

84

90

Cross-linked inulin was prepared via a method similar to that of starch modification

91

(Ren, Jiang, Wang, Zhou, & Tong, 2012; Liu, Dong, Men, Jiang, Tong, & Zhou, 2012). 5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Typically, L-In (10 g) was dispersed in water (200 mL) with constant stirring for 1 h

93

at 25 °C and then 1.1 g of cross-linker SH was added followed by the addition of

94

Na2CO3 (2 mol/L) until reached pH 10. Then the pre-polymerization solution was

95

polymerized with continuous stirring at 45 °C for 3.5 h. Upon completion of the

96

reaction, the pH of the suspension was adjusted to 7 with 2 mol/L HCl. Then

97

cross-linked inulin was precipitated with 95% ethanol, followed by centrifugation and

98

washing with anhydrous ethanol. Finally, after washings with water and lyophilizing,

99

cross-linked long-chain inulin (CL-In) was obtained. Cross-linked short-chain inulin

M AN U

SC

RI PT

92

100

(CS-In) was prepared in the same manner but with the S-In in place of L-In.

101

2.3 Structure characterization

Different inulin (L-In, S-In, CS-In and CL-In) were characterized by FT-IR

103

(Equinox 55, China), the scanning range was from 400 cm−1 to 4000 cm−1. SEM

104

analysis was performed by a scanning electron microscope (Sigma 300, Carl Zeiss

105

Jena) with amplification at 10

106

were sputter-coated with gold before analysis.

107

2.4 Determination of inulin content

times (Palma, García, & Márquez, 2014); samples

EP

3

AC C

108

TE D

102

Inulin is a non-reducing polysaccharide, glucose and fructose contained in native

109

inulin are reducing sugars. Total sugar content was determined by method of

110

phenol-sulfuric acid, reducing sugar content was determined by the dinitrosalicylic

111

acid (DNS) method (Miller, 1959). Ultraviolet and visible spectrophotometer 6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (UV-VIS) was used to analyze the mass concentration of sugar in solutions. In order

113

to get the inulin content accurately, the reducing sugar content contained in native

114

inulin was subtracted (Glibowski & Bukowska, 2011).

115

W=

ρ-ρ1 ×V m

×100% (1)

RI PT

112

Where W is the inulin content in sample (%), ρ refers to the mass concentration of

117

total sugar (mg/mL), ρ1 stands for the mass concentration of reducing sugars (mg/mL),

118

V is the volume of the sample (mL), and m represents the amount of sample (mg).

119

2.5 Determination for degree of polymerization

M AN U

SC

116

Molecular weights (Mw) of different inulin (L-In, S-In, CS-In and CL-In) were

121

determined by a high performance gel-filtration chromatography (HPGFC), which

122

was performed on a high-performance liquid chromatography system (Agilent 1260,

123

Germany) with a TSK-GEL GMPWXL column (7.8 × 300 mm) eluted with pure

124

water at a flow fate of 0.7 mL/min (Zhang, Tian, Jiang, & Ming, 2014). Standard

125

polyethylene glycols (600 Da, 1000 Da, 2000 Da, 4000Da, 10000 Da) were also

126

applied to the same system. The molecular weight distributions of the samples were

127

determined by comparison with the retention time of standard polyethylene glycols

128

under the same conditions. The DP of inulin can be obtained according to Mw = 162

129

DP + 180.

130

2.6 Determination of solubility, viscosity, and stability

AC C

EP

TE D

120

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 131

2.6.1 Water Solubility

The solubility experiments were visually conducted in an illuminated condition in a

133

thermostatic water bath. Water solubility of different inulin (L-In, S-In, CS-In and

134

CL-In) were evaluated with 100 mL water in a beaker, which was then immersed in a

135

water bath at 25 °C, 40 °C, 60 °C and 80 °C, respectively (Wang, Fu, & Yang, 2012;

136

Naskar, Dan, Ghosh, & Moulik, 2010). The temperature was controlled by

137

temperature regulator and water circulator in the experiment. Inulin and water mixture

138

was stirred at 150 rpm to make the solution homogeneous. At each temperature, 0.1 g

139

of inulin was added to water solution at a slow speed rate of 0.1 g/min until

140

undissolved particles appeared in the solution. After equilibrium, stirring was

141

discontinued and the solution was settled in water bath at the appropriate temperature

142

for 1 h. Finally, the upper portion was collected, filtered, poured into a volumetric

143

flask, and diluted to an appropriate concentration for content analysis.

144

2.6.2 Intrinsic viscosity measurement

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

132

With pure water as blank sample, an Ubbelohde viscometer (Ф0.57 mm - 4 mL)

146

was applied to measure intrinsic viscosity of different inulin samples (L-In, S-In,

147

CS-In and CL-In) at 25 °C. The flow time of a solution in the viscometer was taken

148

after thermal equilibrium allowing 15 min time for each solution prior to

149

measurement (Naskar, Dan, Ghosh, & Moulik, 2010).

150

2.6.3 Thermal and acid stability

AC C

145

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Conversion ratio of reducing sugar (RRS) was used to determine thermal and acid

152

stability (Glibowski & Bukowska, 2008). Reducing sugar content was determined

153

through the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method (Miller, 1959). Thermal stability tests

154

were implemented using 20 mL of 10 mg/g different sample solution (L-In, S-In,

155

CS-In and CL-In) immersed in water bath at 20, 40, 60, 70, 80, 100 °C for 1 h.

RI PT

151

Acid stability tests were implemented by adjusting pH of sample solution to

157

different standard (1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0) with hydrochloric acid at 25 °C.

158

After hydrolysis for 1 h, pH of the sample solution was adjusted to 7.0. RRS (%) can

159

directly reflect on the increment of reducing sugar share.

M AN U

SC

156

160

(2)

Where, m1 is the reducing sugar content after 1h, m2 represents the reducing sugar

TE D

161

RRS % =

content before 1h, M is the total sugar content.

163

2.7 Moisture absorption and holding capability measurement

EP

162

Moisture absorption was measured through the method similar to Zhou’s (Zhou,

165

Zhang, Ma, & Tong, 2008). Different samples (L-In, S-In, CS-In and CL-In) were

166

stored at room temperature in Conway desiccators with controlled relative humidity

167

maintained by saturated salt solutions ((NH4)2SO4, Na2CO3), and the corresponding

168

humidity were 81%, and 92% RH at room temperature. Samples were fully dried at

169

80 °C and weighted (Wd) before put into desiccators. A set of dried sample were put

AC C

164

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT into desiccators with a given humidity. After stored in desiccators for predetermined

171

time (6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 h), samples were taken out and weighted (Ww). The

172

moisture content (%) was determined by Equation (3) and moisture sorption kinetic

173

curves were plotted.

176



/

2.8 Rheological properties

(3)

SC

175

Moisture content % =

A rheometer (Discovery HR-2, TA Instruments Ltd., America) was used to

M AN U

174

RI PT

170

177

determine the rheological properties of inulin suspension.

178

2.8.1 Steady shear measurements

Different inulin (L-In, S-In, CS-In and CL-In) aqueous hydrocolloid dispersions

180

were prepared through suspending in water at 25 °C at a concentration of 5 %, 10 %,

181

20 %, 30 %, 40 %, 50 % (w/v) respectively and stored at 25 °C and used within 2

182

days after the preparation. Inulin suspensions were loaded on the base plate and

183

excessive sample was wiped off with a spatula. A thin layer of low-density silicone oil

184

was covered on the periphery of geometry to minimize evaporation loss before

185

measurement (Wang, Gu, Li, Hong, & Cheng, 2013). TA rheometer was used to

186

determine the relationship between viscosity and shear rate. The measuring geometry

187

employed was a parallel plate (40 mm in diameter). The gap size and testing

188

temperature were set at 500 µm and 25 °C. A range of shear rate (1~500 s-1) was

AC C

EP

TE D

179

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT applied to samples. Then, inulin (L-In, S-In, CS-In and CL-In) dispersions of 40 %

190

was tested at temperature ranging from 20 to 80 °C with a shear rate of 50 s-1 to

191

investigate the effect of temperature on the steady rheological properties of inulin.

192

2.8.2 Dynamic frequency sweep measurements

RI PT

189

A concentration of 40 % (w/v) for inulin aqueous hydrocolloid dispersions were

194

used to investigate the dynamic rheological properties. Small-amplitude oscillatory

195

shear experiments were conducted over a frequency (w) range of 1~100 rad/s at 25 °C,

196

yielding the shear storage (G’) and loss (G’’) moduli. Strain value was set at 2 %,

197

which was within its linear viscoelastic range (Freitas, Gorin, Neves, & Sierakowski,

198

2003).

199

2.9 Statistical analyses

TE D

M AN U

SC

193

All experiments were conducted in triplicate for each sample, and results were

201

expressed as mean ± standard deviation. All data were statistically compared between

202

groups using one-way analysis of variance. Significant differences among the mean

203

values were determined by Duncan’s multiple range test with p < 0.05.

204

3. Results and discussion

205

3.1 Structural characterization of different inulin

AC C

EP

200

206

FT-IR was employed to demonstrate successful cross-linking of inulin to ensure the

207

increasing DP. Infrared spectra of CL-In (Fig. 1 (a)), L-In (Fig. 1 (b)), CS-In (Fig. 1 11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (c)) and S-In (Fig. 1 (d)) were registered and compared. As shown in Fig. 1, the

209

spectra of L-In and S-In showed almost the same results just as CL-In and CS-In. The

210

peak at 933 cm-1、1031 cm-1、3400 cm-1 represent skeleton absorption peaks of inulin.

211

L-In displayed a stretching vibrational absorption peak of glycosidic bond at 1132 cm

212

−1

213

indicated by arrows. Besides, the stretching vibrational peak at 3200 ~ 3600cm

214

CL-In was significantly weaker than that of L-In, indicating that hydroxyl was

215

involved in nucleophilic substitution reaction. These results confirmed the successful

216

crosslinking of inulin in this experiment.

RI PT

208

−1

as

-1

of

M AN U

SC

, and CL-In displayed relatively strong band of organic phosphate at 1280 cm

SEM was employed to characterize the morphologies of L-In, S-In, CS-In and

218

CL-In. Fig. 2 showed that the morphology of S-In (Fig. 2(a)), L-In (Fig. 2(b)), CS-In

219

(Fig. 2(c)) and CL-In (Fig. 2(d)) in SEM micrographs significantly differed after they

220

were amplified by 10 3 times. SEM images showed that S-In (Fig. 2(a)) and L-In (Fig.

221

2(b)) (Fig. 2(b)) were found to comprise relatively smooth microspheres. In contrast,

222

CS-In (Fig. 2(c)) and CL-In (Fig. 2(d)) displayed significantly rougher and more

223

uneven clusters of polymer rather beads. The size of L-In microspheres was obviously

224

larger than that of S-In. Polymers of CS-In and CL-In were irregular in shape, with

225

noticeable indentation and roughness on surface of polymers these shows the effect of

226

inlet temperature and solvent on the morphology characteristics (García, Vega,

227

Jimenez, Santos, & Robert, 2013). In addition, high viscosity of CL-In may cause the

228

occurrence of adhesion between the polymers.

AC C

EP

TE D

217

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 229

3.2 Purity and molecular weight (Mw) of inulin Purity of S-In, L-In, CS-In and CL-In was evaluated by the method of 2.4, and as

231

86.13±4.09 %, 90.91±2.77 %, 91.64±1.57 %, and 93.54±2.31 %, respectively. The

232

purity of S-In was relatively lower than the others, due to the involvement of diffluent

233

small molecular like reducing sugar. Furthermore, the HPGFC results indicated that

234

the average molecular weights of S-In, L-In, CS-In and CL-In were 877, 2022, 1295

235

and 2626 Da (shown in Table 1), respectively. S-In (average DP = 4.30) and L-In

236

(average DP = 11.37) could be separated by alcohol precipitation, because inulin with

237

small molecular weight had a better solubility in alcohol and had not been precipitated.

238

The average molecular weight of CL-In was 2626 Da, more than that of L-In (2022

239

Da), indicating that cross-linked inulin with greater molecular weight and higher DP

240

than native inulin was obtained, which lies in the fact that small inulin molecules were

241

cross-linked by cross-linker, leading to the formation of a larger inulin molecule.

242

3.3 Solubility and intrinsic viscosity

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

230

Solubility data for inulin in water at different temperatures are presented in Table 1.

244

As can be observed, solubility at a particular temperature increases as: CL-In < L-In <

245

CS-In < S-In, indicating that the solubility of inulin decreased significantly with the

246

increase of inulin DP. Besides, with the temperature increasing, the solubility of inulin

247

increased whereas the solubility increment of inulin with higher DP was obviously

248

smaller.

AC C

243

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT As shown in the table 1, intrinsic viscosity of inulin increases as: S-In < CS-In <

250

L-In < CL-In, indicating inulin with better intrinsic viscosity could be obtained

251

through cross-linking. This could be explained by the increase of DP and introduction

252

of hydrophilic phosphoric acid groups. With higher intrinsic viscosity, CL-In could be

253

a potential food additive to improve food texture.

254

3.4 Thermal and acid stability of inulin

SC

RI PT

249

Thermal stability of S-In, L-In, CS-In and CL-In was investigated in temperature

256

ranging from 20 °C to 100 °C. As shown in Fig. 3(a), the rising temperature within

257

100 °C had significant effects on RRS (%). Besides, RRS (%) of CL-In was

258

transparently lower than that of L-In at each temperature point, the trend was also

259

applicable to S-In and CS-In, implying that crossed-linked inulin displayed stronger

260

thermal stability than corresponding native inulin. The superior thermal stability of

261

CL-In was attributed to the higher DP and greater molecular weight than S-In and

262

L-In. This phenomenon may be simply explained as with the higher DP, thermal

263

stability becomes stronger for intermolecular interaction of cross-linked inulin and

264

harder for chemical bond to break when heated. The result obtained corresponded

265

with that of Kim et al. (2001) who noticed an increase in reducing sugar content due

266

to heating for the samples at neutral pH, from which they supposed that hydrolysis

267

happened and inulin molecules were broken down into shorter chains. Besides, Bohm

268

et al. (2005) also reported significant degradation of inulin was observed for

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

255

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT temperatures between 165 and 195 °C, about 50 to 90 % of inulin degradation was

270

found after 30 min of heating, increasing to nearly complete degradation after 60 min.

271

However, these results did not corroborate with the study of Glibowski and Bukowska

272

(2008), who showed that inulin was chemically stable even at 80 °C in the neutral

273

environment. The different DP of inulin adopted may be the major contributor to the

274

different results presented in different articles. In our work, only less than 2 % RRS

275

(%) occurred for all four inulin under 100 °C, demonstrating only a very small

276

amount of inulin were broken down into reducing sugar. An interesting find could be

277

observed in Fig.3 (a) that S-In with the lowest DP (average DP = 4.30) exhibited

278

highest RRS (%) whereas CL-In with highest DP (average DP = 15.10) exhibited

279

lowest RRS (%), which showed that inulin with higher DP owned stronger ability to

280

resist heating degradation. The average DP of inulin adopted by Glibowski and

281

Bukowska (2008) was more than 23, so the inulin with an average DP of 23 was more

282

difficult to break down to reducing sugar under the 80 °C.

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

269

Acid stability of S-In, L-In, CS-In and CL-In was investigated in pH value ranging

284

from 1 to 7. As shown in Fig. 3(b), the effect of pH value on inulin degradation was

285

transparent when acidity rising. RRS (%) of inulin sharply rose with the decrease of

286

pH value during pH value was under 6. This phenomenon indicated that inulin

287

breakdown and hydrolysis occurred in an acidic environment (pH < 6). Similar with

288

thermal stability test, RRS (%) of CL-In was lower than that of S-In, L-In and CS-In

289

at every pH point, this indicated that the acid stability of inulin was markedly

AC C

283

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT improved after cross-linking because inulin with higher DP was more difficult to

291

transform into reducing sugar under acidic conditions (Dan, Ghosh, & Moulik, 2010).

292

3.5 Moisture absorption capability

RI PT

290

Moisture absorption capabilities of S-In, L-In, CS-In and CL-In were

294

investigated at 81% RH (Fig. 4(a)). Fig. 4(a) showed that moisture absorption content

295

of all four inulin steadily increased along with the time at room temperature. Basically,

296

moisture absorption of all four inulin was quick in the first 24 h conditioning,

297

afterwards all curves turned into level (Liu, Dong, Men, Jiang, Tong, & Zhou, 2012).

298

Moisture absorption kinetics was also examined at 92% RH. The moisture absorption

299

trend at 92% RH (Fig. 4(b)) was same as at 81% RH. However, for each kind of

300

inulin, the equilibrium moisture content at 92% RH was clearly higher than that at 81%

301

RH, which attributed to higher relative humidity at different conditions. The S-In

302

exhibited marked higher moisture absorption ability than L-In at all the time, which

303

also occurred between CS-In and CL-In. This phenomenon implied that inulin with

304

lower DP owned stronger water-binding ability due to lots of external hydroxyl

305

groups, which could explain the result obtained by Luo et al. (2017) that inulin with

306

lower DP had the stronger influence on the pasting temperature and displayed

307

stronger suppression on the retrogradation of wheat starch. Another interesting find

308

was that after cross-linking, the cross-linked inulin (CS-In and CL-In) showed a

309

notable higher moisture uptake than the corresponding native inulin (S-In and L-In) at

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

293

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT every time point because the introduction of hydrophilic phosphate groups gave rise

311

to the enhancement of moisture uptake ability of cross-linked inulin.

312

3.6 Rheological properties of inulin suspensions

RI PT

310

In order to understand the rheological properties, the steady shear viscoelastic

314

properties of the dispersions of S-In, L-In, CS-In and CL-In were investigated. Fig. 5

315

((a), (b), (c) and (d)) exhibited the dependent relationship between viscosity and shear

316

rate at different inulin concentration. All of the flow curves of measured inulin

317

dispersions presented shear-thinning behavior under the entire measured shear rates

318

(1~500 s-1), because the viscosity remarkably declined as the shear rate increased.

319

This phenomenon could be explained by the fact that shear action contributed to

320

directional motion of inulin molecules in dispersions, so that the molecular orientation

321

and flow direction tended to be the same, and the intermolecular interaction force was

322

weakened, resulting in the decline of viscosity (Olivi-Tran, Botet, & Cabane, 1998).

323

The shear-thinning behavior of cross-linked inulin could be applied in food

324

processing. Due to the lower viscosity at high shear rate, the cross-linked inulin could

325

be used in mixing and pumping operations to reduce energy consumption. Besides,

326

the viscosities of all the four dispersions were dependent on the inulin concentration,

327

the larger the inulin concentration, the higher were the viscosities. Higher density of

328

chain entanglements could possibly be the major contributor to higher viscosities.

329

Moreover, we could observe that the viscosities of L-In and CL-In dispersions (Fig. 5

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

313

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (c), (d)) at high concentration (30%~50%) were clearly higher than that of S-In and

331

CS-In (Fig. 5 ((a), (b)), and this trend still remained at low concentration (5%~20%)

332

but not very obviously. These demonstrated that inulin dispersion with greater DP

333

owned higher viscosities. This demonstration may provide another explanation for the

334

result revealed by Guimaraes et al. (2018b) that inulin with higher DP was more

335

effective for stabilization of prebiotic whey beverage, which authors attributed to the

336

stronger ability of higher DP inulin to form a three-dimensional network to stabilize

337

the two phases.

339

SC

M AN U

338

RI PT

330

The shear-thinning rheological behavior could be characterized by a power law constitutive equation. The power law equation may be written as

340

(4)

TE D

τ = K*Υn-1

where τ is the shear viscosity (Pa), K is the front consistency index, Υ is the shear rate,

342

and n is the power law exponent. When n is less than 1, it means the material is a

343

pseudoplastic fluid, when the exponent (n) is equal to 1, the material is a Newtonian

344

fluid and when n is higher than 1, the material is a dilatant fluid (Hong, Wu, Liu, &

345

Gu, 2015). The power law constitutive equation (4) was used to fit shear-thinning

346

viscosity values for all measured inulin dispersions. The results of these fit data are

347

summarized in Table 2. Overall, the values of n were all less than one for inulin

348

shear-thinning behavior, and the values of K increased with the increase of inulin

349

concentration and DP. The apparent viscosity (η100) at a given shear stress of 100 s-1

AC C

EP

341

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT was determined and presented in Table 2, from which we observed that both

351

increasing DP and concentration of inulin gave rise to the increase of the viscosity for

352

each type of inulin dispersions. The apparent viscosity at a given concentration of 40 %

353

was presented in Fig. 6(a). We observed that the inulin DP led to an increase of the

354

viscosity of the inulin dispersions as: S-In < CS-In < L-In < CL-In. The significant

355

increase of this viscosity was probably due to the enhanced interactions of inulin

356

molecular and flow resistance.

SC

RI PT

350

The rheogram depicted in Fig. 6(b) showed the effect of temperature on the inulin

358

rheological properties at a steady shear rate of 50 s-1. We observed that the viscosity

359

of S-In and L-In decreased gradually with the increase of temperature. Viscosity of

360

CS-In as well as CL-In increased first and then decreased with the rise in temperature.

361

The reason for these may be that the increasing temperature enhanced intermolecular

362

motion, which led to increasing viscosity. However, as temperature increased further,

363

inulin solubility increased resulting in declining flow resistance and the decrease of

364

viscosity (Paula & Rodrigues, 1995).

TE D

EP

AC C

365

M AN U

357

Fig. 6(c) showed the measurement results of dynamic frequency sweep for 40 %

366

dispersions of inulin (S-In, L-In, CS-In and CL-In). Viscoelastic properties of four

367

kinds of dispersions exhibited similar trend. Both G’ and G’’ moduli curves were

368

slightly dependent on frequency (w). The G’ for all S-In, L-In, CS-In and CL-In

369

dispersions were obviously greater than G’’ over the measured frequency sweep,

19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT indicating that the inulin exhibited viscoelastic solid or solid-like behavior. Both G’

371

and G’’ moduli for the CS-In and CL-In dispersions were correspondingly greater

372

than those of S-In and L-In dispersions, due to the higher DP with cross-linked inulin.

373

The G’ at entire measured frequency points increased as: S-In < CS-In < L-In < CL-In

374

(Fig. 6(c)). The result suggested that the CL-In dispersion exhibited most solid-like

375

viscoelastic behavior among the four types of dispersions, and CL-In dispersion

376

should be a strong gel-like material. These may be caused by the stronger

377

intermolecular interaction and greater molecular chain entanglements among

378

cross-linked inulin molecular (Tong, Liu, Veeramani, & Chung, 2002). The gel-like

379

behavior of the CL-In dispersion suggests many potential applications not only in

380

food processing, but also in cosmetic products and drug delivery. According to

381

Edwards’ theory (Doi & Edwards, 1986), the high-frequency moduli behavior of the

382

samples could display some information of the structure. The frequency moduli

383

behavior was determined by log–log complex moduli |G*| (|G| = (G’2 + G’’2)1/2) curve

384

slope at frequencies ranging from 1 to 100 rad/s. The frequency moduli for the L-In

385

and CL-In dispersions were all proportional to w1/2 well (Fig. 6(d)), indicating flexible

386

coil-like behavior of inulin (Ferry, 1980). Over the measured frequency range, the

387

S-In and CS-In dispersions did not show moduli proportional to w1/2 due to the

388

scattered experimental data points, which implied the S-In and CS-In couldn’t exhibit

389

the behavior of flexible chains.

390

4. Conclusions

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

370

20

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Based on the separated native S-In and L-In, two types of cross-linked inulin with

392

different DP (CS-In and CL-In) was successfully prepared using SH as cross-linker in

393

this work. When compared with corresponding native S-In and L-In, we found that

394

CS-In and CL-In exhibited a higher intrinsic viscosity, moisture absorption capability,

395

thermal and acid stability, but with lower water solubility because of the higher DP.

396

Furthermore, in the study of rheological properties, all four inulin dispersions

397

exhibited shear-thinning behaviors, which could be described as a pseudoplastic fluid.

398

In addition, CL-In showed more solid viscoelastic properties due to the higher DP

399

when compared with the other three inulin dispersions. In summary, viscoelastic

400

behaviors of cross-linked dispersions were dependent on the DP and concentration of

401

inulin. Therefore, it is evident that cross-linked inulin can have potential applications

402

as a food addictive to regulate the rheology and texture of the products through using

403

inulin with different DP or different concentrations. Moreover, cross-linked inulin

404

prepared through this novel method could have significant application potential for

405

cosmetic gels and drug delivery carriers. Currently, further research has been done on

406

specific application of CL-In used as a stabilizer in set yoghurt processing.

407

Acknowledgments

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

408

RI PT

391

This work was financially supported by the special project for people's livelihood

409

of Chongqing municipal science and technology commission [cstc2015shmszx0367];

410

and national natural science foundation of China [31471581].

21

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 411

References

412

Barclay, T., Ginicmarkovic, M., Cooper, P., & Petrovsky, N. (2010). Inulin - a versatile polysaccharide with multiple pharmaceutical and food chemical uses.

414

Journal of Excipients & Food Chemicals, 1(3), 27 - 50.

RI PT

413

Balthazar C. F., Santillo, A., Figliola, L., Silva, H.L.A., Esmerino, E.A., Freitas, M. Q.,

416

et al. (2018a). Sensory evaluation of a novel prebiotic sheep milk strawberry

417

beverage. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 98, 94–98.

418

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.08.017.

M AN U

SC

415

Balthazar, C.F., Silva, H.L.A., Cavalcanti, R.N., Esmerino, E.A., Cappato, L.P., Abud,

420

Y. K. D., et al. (2017). Prebiotics addition in sheep milk ice cream: A rheological,

421

microstructural and sensory study. Journal of Functional Foods, 35, 564–573.

422

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2017.06.004.

Balthazar, C. F., Silva, H. L. A., Esmerino, E. A., Rocha, R. S., Moraes, J., Carmo, M.

EP

423

TE D

419

A.V., et al. (2018b). The addition of inulin and Lactobacillus casei 01 in sheep

425

milk ice cream. Food Chemistry, 246, 464–472.

426 427

AC C

424

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.12.002.

Bohm, A., Kaiser, I., Trebstein, A., & Henle, T. (2005). Heat-induced degradation of

428

inulin. European Food Research & Technology, 220, (5-6), 466-471.

429

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-004-1098-8. 22

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 430

Canbulat, Z., & Ozcan, T. (2015). Effects of Short‐Chain and Long‐Chain Inulin on the Quality of Probiotic Yogurt Containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Journal

432

of Food Processing & Preservation, 39 (6), 1251–1260.

433

https://doi:10.1111/jfpp.12343.

436

University Press.

SC

435

Doi, M. & Edwards, S. F. (1986). The theory of polymer dynamics. London: Oxford

Dan A., Ghosh S., & Moulik S. P. (2010). Physicochemical studies on the biopolymer

M AN U

434

RI PT

431

437

inulin: a critical evaluation of its self-aggregation, aggregate-morphology,

438

interaction with water, and thermal stability. Biopolymers, 91 (9), 687-699.

439

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bip.21199.

Freitas, R. A., Gorin, P. A.J., Neves, J., & Sierakowski, M. R. (2003). A rheological

TE D

440

description of mixtures of a galactoxyloglucan with high amylose and waxy corn

442

starches. Carbohydrate Polymers, 51(1), 25 - 32.

443

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(02)00095-4.

445 446

Ferry, J. D. (1980). Viscoelastic properties of polymers (3rd ed.). New York: John

AC C

444

EP

441

Wiley & Sons.

García, P., Vega, J., Jimenez, P., Santos, J. & Robert, P. (2013). Alpha-tocopherol

447

microspheres with cross-linked and acetylated inulin and their release profile in a

448

hydrophilic model. European Journal of Lipid Science & Technology, 115(7), 23

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 449 450

811-819. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201200109.

García, P., Vergara, C. & Robert, P., (2015). Release Kinetic in Yogurt from Gallic Acid Microparticles with Chemically Modified Inulin. Journal of Food Science,

452

80(10), 2147-2152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13001.

RI PT

451

Glibowski, P., & Bukowska, A. (2011). The effect of pH, temperature and heating

454

time on inulin chemical stability. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum: Technologia

455

Alimentaria, 10 (2), 188-214.

M AN U

456

SC

453

Gibson, G. R., Hutkins, R., Sanders, M. E., Prescott, S. L., Reimer, R. A., Salminen, S. J., et al. (2017). The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and

458

Prebiotics ISAPP consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics.

459

Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 14, 491–502.

460

TE D

457

Guimarães, J. T., Silva, E. K., Alvarenga, V. O., Costa, A., Cunha, R. L., Freitas, M. Q., et al. (2018a). Physicochemical changes and microbial inactivation after

462

high-intensity ultrasound processing of prebiotic whey beverage applying

463

different ultrasonic power levels. Ultrasonics – Sonochemistry, 44, 251–260.

AC C

464

EP

461

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.02.012.

465

Guimarães, J. T., Silva, E. K., Costa, A. L. R., Cunha, R. L., Freitas, M. Q., Meireles,

466

M. A. A., et al. (2018b). Manufacturing a prebiotic whey beverage exploring the

467

influence of degree of inulin polymerization. Food Hydrocolloids, 77, 787-795.

24

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 468 469

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.11.021.

Hong Y., Wu Y., Liu G. & Gu Z. (2015) Effect of amylose on pasting and rheological properties of corn starch/xanthan blends. Starch/Stärke, 67, 98–106.

471

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/star.201400126.

472

RI PT

470

Kim, Y., Faqih, M.N., & Wang, S.S. (2001). Factors affecting gel formation of inulin. Carbohydrate Polymers, 46 (2), 135-145.

474

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(00)00296-4.

M AN U

475

SC

473

Luo, D., Li, Y., Xu, B, Ren, G., Li, P., Li, X., et al. (2017). Effects of inulin with different degree of polymerization on gelatinization and retrogradation of wheat

477

starch. Food Chemistry, 229, 35–43.

478

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.02.058.

479

TE D

476

Liu, Z., Dong, Y., Men, H., Jiang, M., Tong, J. & Zhou, J. (2012). Post-crosslinking modification of thermoplastic starch/PVA blend films by using sodium

481

hexametaphosphate. Carbohydrate Polymers, 89 (2), 473-477.

482

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.02.076.

484

AC C

483

EP

480

Li, S.P., Hu, T., Chen, Y.L., Zheng, C.Y., Liu, T., Ma, G.H., et al. (2010). Cross-linked inulin as a potential plasma expander: Biochemical properties and physiological

485

characterization in a rabbit model. Carbohydrate Polymers, 82(4), 1054-1060.

486

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.06.018.

25

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 487 488 489

Miller, G.L. (1959). Use of DinitrosaIicyIic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry, 31(3), 426-428.

Naskar, B., Dan A., Ghosh S., & Moulik S. P. (2010). Characteristic physicochemical features of the biopolymer inulin in solvent added and depleted states.

491

Carbohydrate Polymers, 81, 700–706.

492

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.03.041.

SC

493

RI PT

490

Naskar B., Dan A., Ghosh S., & Moulik S. P. (2010). Viscosity and Solubility Behavior of the Polysaccharide Inulin in Water, Water plus Dimethyl Sulfoxide,

495

and Water plus Isopropanol Media. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data,

496

55(7), 2424-2427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/je900834c.

Olivi-Tran, N., Botet, R., & Cabane, B. (1998). Monte Carlo simulations of colloidal

TE D

497

M AN U

494

dispersions under shear. Physical Review E, 57 (57), 1997-2003.

499

http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.57.1997.

501 502 503

Pawel, G., & Adam, W. (2008). Effect of thermochemical treatment on the structure of inulin and its gelling properties. International Journal of Food Science &

AC C

500

EP

498

Technology, 43(11), 2075-2082. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.13652621.2008.01825.x.

504

Paula, R.C.M. & Rodrigues, J.F. (1995). Composition and rheological properties of

505

cashew tree gum, the exudate polysaccharide from Anacardium occidentale L.

26

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 506

Carbohydrate Polymers, 26 (95), 177–181.

507

https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8617(95)00006-S.

508

Palma, M., García, P., & Márquez, R. G., (2014). Vergara, C., Robert, P. Release kinetics of flavonoids in methyl linoleate from microparticles designed with

510

inulin and channelizing agent. Food Research International, 64, 99 – 105.

511

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.05.064.

SC

512

RI PT

509

Ren, L., Jiang, M., Wang, L., Zhou, J., & Tong, J. (2012). A method for improving dispersion of starch nanocrystals in water through crosslinking modification with

514

sodium hexametaphosphate. Carbohydrate Polymers, 87(2), 1874-1876.

515

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.070.

Shoaib M., Shehzad A., Omar M., Rakha A., Raza H., Sharif H.R., et al. (2016).

TE D

516

M AN U

513

Inulin: Properties, health benefits and food applications. Carbohydrate Polymers,

518

147, 444-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.020.

520 521 522 523 524

Tong, Y., Liu, T. Veeramani, S., & Chung, T. (2002). Bulk Viscosity and Its Unstable Behavior upon Storage in Polyimide Precursor Solutions. Industrial &

AC C

519

EP

517

Engineering Chemistry Research, 41(17), 4266 - 4272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie020159f.

Vervoort L., Mooter G. V. d., Augustijns P., Busson R., Toppet S., & Kinget R. (1997) Inulin hydrogels as carriers for colonic drug targeting: I. Synthesis and

27

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 525

characterization of methacrylated inulin and hydrogel formation. Pharmaceutical

526

Research, 14 (12), 1730-1737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1012179813102.

Wang Z., Gu Z., Li Z., Hong Y., & Cheng L. (2013). Effects of urea on freeze–thaw

528

stability of starch-based wood adhesive. Carbohydrate Polymers, 95, 397- 403.

529

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.02.009.

Wang N., Fu Q., & Yang G. (2012). Determination of the solubility, dissolution

SC

530

RI PT

527

enthalpy and entropy of icariin in water, ethanol, and methanol. Fluid Phase

532

Equilibria, 324, 41– 43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2012.03.022.

533

M AN U

531

Zhang, T., Tian, Y., Jiang, B., & Ming, M. (2014). Purification, preliminary structural characterization and in vitro antioxidant activity of polysaccharides from

535

Acanthus ilicifolius. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 56(1), 9-14.

536

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2013.11.010.

Zhou J., Zhang J., Ma Y., & Tong J. (2008). Surface photo-crosslinking of corn starch

EP

537

TE D

534

sheets. Carbohydrate Polymers, 74, 405 - 410.

539

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.03.006.

540 541

AC C

538

Zhang, F., Fang, L., Wang, C., Shi, L., Chang, T., Yang, H., & Cui, M. (2013). Effects of starches on the textural, rheological, and color properties of surimi–beef gels

542

with microbial tranglutaminase. Meat Science, 93, 533–537.

543

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.11.013.

28

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 1 Average Mw, average DP, intrinsic viscosity, and water solubility of S-In, L-In, CS-In and CL-In.

Average

Average DP

RI PT

544

Intrinsic

Solubility (g/100g)

Mw (Da)

40℃

60℃

80℃

26.86±0.82aD

40.82±0.31aC

46.79±0.21aB

49.62±0.88aA

8.30±0.48bD

14.61±0.13bC

21.36±0.06bB

32.35±0.07bA

877±21d

4.30±0.16d

1.53±0.11d

CS-In

1295±32c

6.88±0.19c

2.43±0.14c

L-In

2022±53b

11.37±0.33b

4.85±0.20b

1.97±0.16cD

7.68±0.20cC

11.76±0.25cB

20.70±0.93cA

CLNI

2626±58a

15.10±0.36a

1.21±0.02cC

4.08±0.10dB

7.39±0.16dA

7.68±0.01dA

TE D

S-Ln

EP

M AN U

25℃

SC

viscosity (dL/g)

AC C

6.78±0.53a

545

Mean values followed by the different letter (a−d) in each column are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05). Mean values followed by the different

546

letter (A−D) for temperature in each row are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05). 29

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 2 Power law model-fitted parameters.

5%

0.0073

10%

n

R2

0.1528

0.3393

0.9718

0.0069

0.1134

0.3918

0.9759

20%

0.0088

0.2823

30%

0.0096

0.3019

40%

0.0115

0.3231

50%

0.0114

0.3283

RI PT

(Pa•s )

5%

0.0079

0.198

0.3

0.9926

10%

0.0097

0.2095

0.3337

0.9663

0.2467

0.9723

0.2508

0.9636

0.2756

0.9336

0.2702

0.9442

SC

n

M AN U

20%

L-In

0.0339

0.7737

0.3209

0.9604

0.5376

29.0582

0.1336

0.9692

1.083

62.1779

0.1205

0.9754

3.093

170.4428

0.1294

0.9926

0.0077

0.1959

0.2972

0.9828

10%

0.0208

0.4444

0.3353

0.971

20%

0.0207

0.4533

0.3297

0.9753

30%

0.0223

0.5776

0.2935

0.9697

40%

0.0205

0.516

0.2997

0.9726

50%

0.0286

0.7474

0.2912

0.9624

5%

0.0115

0.6878

0.112

0.9655

10%

0.0123

0.5904

0.1593

0.9312

20%

0.0351

1.16

0.2405

0.9314

30%

0.5953

37.2853

0.1016

0.976

40%

1.6531

117.1904

0.0747

0.9583

50%

4.0509

218.8529

0.1337

0.9762

30% 40% 50%

EP

TE D

5%

CL-In

K

(Pa•s)

S-In

CS-In

η100

Concentration (%)

AC C

547

30

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 548

Fig. Captions

549

Fig.1 IR spectra of CL-In (a), L-In (b), CS-In (c) and S-In (d).

RI PT

550 551

Fig.2 SEM images of S-In powder (a), L-In powder (b), CS-In powder (c) and CL-In

552

powder (d).

SC

553

Fig.3 Thermal stability of four kinds of inulin (a), acid stability of four kinds of inulin

555

(b). (Coordinate values followed by the different letter (A−C) for different inulin at

556

same condition are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05). Coordinate values followed by

557

the different letter (a−f) for each inulin at different conditions are significantly

558

different (p ≤ 0.05)).

EP

559

TE D

M AN U

554

Fig.4 The moisture absorption content of four kinds of inulin at 81 % RH (a), and 92 %

561

RH (b). (Coordinate values followed by the different letter (A−D) for different inulin

562

at same time are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05). Coordinate values followed by the

563

different letter (a−c) for each inulin at different time are significantly different (p ≤

564

0.05)).

AC C

560

565

31

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 566

Fig.5 The viscoelastic properties of the steady shear measurements for S-In (a), CS-In

567

(b), L-In (c) and CL-In (d) dispersions of 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% (w/v)

568

at a temperature of 25 °C.

RI PT

569

Fig.6 The viscoelastic properties of the steady shear measurements for S-In, L-In,

571

CS-In and CL-In dispersions of 40% (w/v) at a temperature of 25 °C (a); Temperature

572

dependence of viscosity for S-In, L-In, CS-In and CL-In dispersions of 40 % (w/v) at

573

a steady shear rate of 50 s-1 (b); The viscoelastic properties of dynamic frequency

574

sweep measurements for the 40% dispersions of inulin at a temperature of 25 °C (c);

575

The viscoelastic properties of dynamic frequency sweep measurements (values of

576

complex modulus (G*) vs. frequency) for the 40% dispersions of S-In, L-In, CS-In

577

and CL-In at a temperature of 25 °C (d).

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

570

32

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Research highlights (1) Cross-linked inulin was prepared using sodium hexametaphosphate as cross-linker.

RI PT

(2) Polymerization degree has marked effects on physicochemical properties of cross-linked inulin.

(3) Cross-linked inulin exhibited as a pseudoplastic fluid and more solid viscoelastic

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

properties.