Vol. 54, No. 1, 1973
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
OF ISOLATED
55-S MITOCHONDRIAL
RIBOSOMES FROM RAT-LIVER Hans de Vries Laboratory
Received
July
and Rya van der Koogh-Schuuring
of Physiological Chemistry, State University, Bloemsingel 10, Groningen, The Netherlands
13,1973
SUMMARY A procedure for the preparative isolation of rat-liver mitochondrial ribosomes free of cytoplasmic contamination is described. The 55-S ribosome was characterized by electrophoretic analysis on acrylamide and agarose gels, It is concluded that its charge/mass ratio is very low and that its volume is larger than that of E.coZi ribosomes and smaller than that of rat-liver cytoplasmic ribosomes. Therefore, the 55-S ribosome is not adequately described by the term "miniribosome".
INTRODUCTION During
the last
years,
contain
small
mitochondria as the native
the sedimentation
tain
(for
reviews,
into
the
(sometimes structures.
smaller
presented real
accepted called
in
dimensions
size
its
the small
cytoplasmic
paper
were
RNAs they the
counterpart
meant
and physicochemical
animal
was deduced
Electronmicroscopically
than this
that
"miniribosomes")
The small
55 S, and from
I and 2).
refs.
somewhat
The experiments
55-S
ribosomes
coefficient, see
appears
insight
has become generally
protein-synthesizing
from
particle
it
con-
55-S 3
.
to get a better
properties
of the
ribosome.
METHODS a. Buffers: threitol, acetate, 0.25
KMEDT buffer: 10 mM Tris-HCl,
100 mM KCl, pH 7.6;
6 mM f3-mercaptoethanol,
M sucrose,
b. Isolation
1 mM Tris-HCl,
10 mM MgC12,
Gel buffer:
60 mM NH4 acetate,
10 mM Tris-acetic
acid,
1 mM dithio4 mM Mg
pH 7.6;
ST buffer:
pH 7.4.
and washing of ntitochondria:
Copyright @ 1973 by Academic Press, Inc. AN rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
0.1 mM EDTA,
308
The method
has been
adapted
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 54, No. 1,1973
rats
of go-120
throughout. 3,200
. For each experiment
g, starved
After
overnight,
and spun down at
suspended
cells
After
added
were
19,000
(giving
werespundown
The final
at 19,000
pellet
was suspended
suspended
20 % Triton 9,500O
and lysed
x g for
stirring
IO min,
X-100
rotor,
After
in KMEDT buffer.
the pellets,
in KMEDT buffer,
containing
layered
a flow-cell
der was connected, fractions
were
and the peak
in a Beckman Ti50
twice
rotor.
with
IO ml at I M sucrose,
resuspended in the same
and spun
collected.
for
were
15 h at
pumped
to which
a recor-
The ribosomal
and spun for 4 h at 50,000rpm
KMEDT buffer
The pellets
were
gradients
254 nm),
were
of
rpm in a Beckman
ribosomes
(wavelength
fractions
mitochondria
IO ml of
at 4’ C. The gradients
of a LKB Uvicord
diluted
onto
% (w/v))
rpm in a Beckman SW27 rotor
washed
C and clarification
the
22,000
c.
by the addition
sucrose
15.0
per
protein).
under
3 h at 60,000
top
were
and spun down again.
as described
on 35 ml isokinetic
(sucroseconcentrationat
through
resuspended
mitochondrial
buffer
resus-
to 1000 ml and the mitochon-
was layered
After
x g),
the mitochondria
mg digitonin/mg
5 min at 0’
the supernatant
(I min at
1.75 mg of digitonin
and lysed
for
was used
removed
from mitochondria:
140 ml KMEDT buffer
X-100.
I % Triton Ti60
in
Then
- 0.16
5 min,
ST buffer
were
was diluted
c. IsoZation of ribosomci! particles were
Sterile
containing
x g for
of 40 male Wistar
livers
(2 min at 17,000
5 min.
of 0.12
2 min at 0’ C, the suspension
used.
pelleted
x g for
a ratio
the
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
and nuclei
and 200 ml buffer
in 200 ml,
ml were
were
homogenization,
x g) and the mitochondria
pended
dria
4
et al.
from Loewenstein
AND BIOPHYSKAL
of ribosomal
particles
were
resuspended
in KMEDT buffer. d. Other ribosomes: Total according
to Blobel
ribosomes
by sucrose-gradient
Total
B.coli
ribosomes
70-S
ribosomes
were
rat-liver
& Potter5;
80-S
ribosomes
ribosomes were
isolated
were
prepared
from
these
separation.
and S-100 purified
cytoplasmic
were
prepared
on sucrose
309
gradients.
according
to Nirenberg6.
Vol. 54, No. 1, 1973
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Sedimentation characteristics Initially, without with
rat-liver
puromycin lysosomal
enzymes,
ethylacetate-soluble
this,
the digitonin method
ting
oxidative
Fig.
1.
mitochondrial
in the peptidyl
small
this
of mitochondria ribosomes.
causing
transferase splitting
molecules treatment
effectively
ribosomes
reaction'. off
from
lysosomes
phosphorylation4.
Fig.
very
high
Since
or other
acetyl-leucyl-tHNA, (cfi
might
explain
METHODS) was introduced:
from mitochondria
1 shows
blanks
contamination
of acetyl-leucine
of mitochondria
removes
showed
without
the profile
that
affec-
was obtained
Separation of mitochondrial ribosomes on isokinetic sucrose gradients. The procedure is described under METHODS. Sedimentation coefficients were relative to N.crassa cytoplasmic 77-S ribosomes run in a parallel tube.-: ribosomes from mitochondria washed with digitonin; - - -: ribosomes from mitochondria washed twice with 0.25 M sucrose, 1 ti EDTA, pH 7.4.
when crude
mitochondrial
gradients.
Mitochondria
of 56-S peaks
ribosomes
(about
ribosomes
were
treated
with
30
A260 units
of 39 S and 28 S. A clear
separated
digitonin
difference
310
on isokinetic yielded
from
40 rat
sucrose
a major livers)
was seen with
fraction
and subunit ribosomes
from
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 54, No. 1, 1973
mitochondria with
washed
this
method
the digitonin but
also
without
treatment 80-S
quite
that
0.25
M sucrose,1
peak of 82-S
ribosomes
does not only
remove
were
indeed
lysosomal
brought treated
hydrolases
mM EDTA instead was obtained. lysosomes
The latter
In the peptidyl
from mitochondria
assumption
with
ribosomes.
by Malkin8.
puromycin
ribosomes
assay
a high
adhering
observations
twice
AND BIOPHYSLCAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
finding
transferase
is
Obviously, the mitochondria
consistent
reaction
back
to normal
in this
way were
interfere
from
of digitonin:
with
with
the blanks
values
if
55-S
used.
This
makes the
the peptidyl
transferase
plausible.
EZectrophoresis of nntochondriaZ ribosomes. Fig.
2a shows
a comparison
0.75 0 r
A
of the migration
velocities
of 55-S ribosomes
@I
A
A260
;; ii
i iI\
0123156
Fig.
2.
0123456 distance
migrated
(cm)
Gel e2ectrophoresi.s of ribosomes. A: 2.2 % polyacrylamide gels. The electrophoresis was performed according to Talens et al.9 , except that pre-swelling was omitted. The buffer was 74 mM NH4 acetate, 5 mM MgCl , 50 s&l Tris-acetate, pH 7.8. Electrophoresis was for 3 h at 12 Ini/ gel at 40 C. B: 0.4 % agarose gels. The electrophoresis was carried out according to Talens et aZ. 10, in gel buffer (METHODS). Electrophoresis was for 2.5 h at 9 mA/gel at 4O C. Gels were scanned at 260 nm on a Gilford 2400-S spectrophotometer with a linear transport system. -: 55s; -a-+: rat-liver 805; ---: E.coZi 70s.
311
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 54, No. 1, 1973
and of rat-liver
cytoplasmic
acrylamide
As expected’,
gels.
the smaller of running not
in
front
allowed,
the 55-S reason
ribosome this
gels
2b).
Under
2b shows
80-S
ribosomes
ribosomes
have
probably
Fig.
like
a very
low negative
between
it
suggests
ments
1
has also
of 55-S
may also 70-S,
ribosomes
been
(that found
ribosomes
in get
to its
is much higher
in
although
its
penetration. 80-S
acrylamide
and
gradients.
intermediate split
et al. “lo). than
to
influence
a position
RNA.
the acryl-
migrated
ribosomes
70-S
which
to a point
cytoplasmic
in
55-S
to its
of a ribosome,
3-8 % linear
by Talens
mass,
ribosomes
rat-liver
E.coZi
that
relative
slightly
stuck
fastest,
indicates
a gradient
on the volume
ribosomes
ribosomes
with
ratio.
travel
IO,1 I . The distance
possible
effect
This
up into shows
sedimentation
that
coefficient
.
These 260
the 55-S
protein
to electrophorese
of E.coZi 55-S
as compared
can
% agarose
by the charge/mass
(i.e.
depends
the migration
two populations the volume
is
This
in 0.4
This
of
ratio
no sieving
slowest.
is
Another
ribosomes.
70-S ribosomes
gradient
and flexibility
and 80-S
of other
of ribosomal
is possible
therefore
that
70-S
size
penetration
evident
charge/mass
the
mobility
charge
amount
a pore
mitochondrial
is
an A
ribosomes
rigidity
3 shows
rat-liver It
and 55-S
the volume
be that
determined
slower
80 S. It
ribosome.
practically
conditions
equilibrium
factors
only
than
that
than
instead
of the 80-S
than
circumstances is
under
concentration)
reach
lower
these
with
no further
could
move slower
slower
by extrapolation that
on 2.2 % poly-
ribosomes,
considerably
than
is
these
due to a high
In gels
that
that
ribosomes
the electrophoretic
velocity
Fig.
80-S
55-S mitochondrial
behaviour
ribosome
ribosomes
70-S
larger
to conclude
by investigating
(fig.
amide
but
unexpected
occurs,migration
is
the
is much larger
of the mitochondrial be tested
and E.coZi
of 70 S, migrate
of course,
for
80-S
ribosomes,
E.coli
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
experiments
nm’A230 , causing
were
done with
nm ratio
of
a slow
migration
highly
1.2 or higher. velocity
312
purified
55-S
Contamination in gels,
could
ribosomes
with
membrane
be excluded
showing fragwith
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 54, No. 1, 1973
r..
I
vo
*.
*
2 4 of electrophoresls
time
Fi .g.
AND BIOPHYSICAL
*
*
6
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
J 3%
6 (days1
Electrophoresis of ribosomes onc pore size gradient of poZyacrylamide. Linear 3-8 % polyacrylamide gradients were made was in “gel as described by Talens et aL. 10. Electrophoresis at 3.6 mA/gel at 4’ C, with continuous circulation of buffer”, the buffer via a peristaltic pump. Runs were in triplicate, and 55-S ribosomes were from two separate experiments. At the times indicated gels were scanned (see fig. 2), and then electrophoresis was continued. o---o: 55s; -: rat-liver 80s; Ad: E.coli 70s.
3.
the
certainty: pholipids
ribosomes
from mitochondria
by [‘4C]-ethanolamine
were
labelled
the only
in
viva
fractions
in their
definitely
phosdevoid
of radioactivity. It
is possible
to make a rough
estimate
we have determined
the buoyant
1.43.
to 37 % RNA and 63 % protein
This
similar
accords
low density
content
RNA
per
has also
ribosome
of the 55-S ribosome
E.coZi
ribosomes15.
very
rough
ribosome
that
is
those
evident
chloramphenicol-sensitivity
(cf.
1 .O x IO6 D (cf. about in the
2.7
ribosomes
of 70-S
arrive and 80-S
the ribosome
We now interpret
of the peptidyltransferase
313
volumes: ribosomes
also
fig.
ref.
about exist
to be
2b).
A
13 , Taking
and Ojala t4),
x 106, equal
gel buffer
we again
that
as a 55-S particle.
I2
by Attardi
of different
between it
in CsCl of the 55-S
found
then
of course),
intermediate
can be isolated 16
densities
assumption,
In conclusion,
is
Assuming
the buoyant
been
as about
weight
between
density
of the ribosomal
the
the molecular to that
the
of
same ratios
as in CsCl
at a volume
of the
(a 55-S
ribosomes. of rat-liver the previously reaction
mitochondria reported of
80-S
Vol. 54, No. 1, 1973
particles
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
to be due to contamination
Our results in
BIOCHEMICAL
further
show that
and the low sedimentation
mitochondrial weight.
Its
low charge
ribosome
is not
protein
with
“mini”
with
respect
are
55-S particles,
the “mini-RNAs”
of the 55-S
properties
high
fraction
notwithstanding
coefficient
physicochemical and its
of this
ribosome,
the rat-liver
to volume
determined
present
and molecular
by its
relatively
content.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish Prof.
F.J.
to thank Loomeijer
manuscript
of ref.
generously
given
Netherlands from
for
A.M.
Kroon
for
encouragement
10 available by Pfizer
Foundation
the Netherlands
Dr.
Ltd.
and Prof.
to us prior This
of Chemical Organization
criticism
and helpful L. Bosch
to publication.
work
was supported
Research
(S.O.N.)
for
the Advancement
suggestions,
for
making Anisomycin
in part with
the
by the
financial
of Pure
was
aid
Research(Z.W.O&
REFERENCES 1. Borst,P. and Grivell,L.A., FEBS Letters, 13, 73(1971) 2. Kroon,A.M., Agsteribbe,E. and De Vries,H., in “The Mechanism of Protein Synthesis and its Regulation”, Ed. by Bosch,L., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 539(1972) 3. Aaij,C., Nanninga,N. and Borst,P., Biochim.Biophys.Acta, 277, 140(1972) Scholte,H.R. and Wit-Peeters,E.M., Biochim.Biophys.Acta, 4. Loewenstein,J., 223, 432(1970) 5. Blobel,G. and Potter,V.R., J.Mol.Biol., 26, 279(1967) in Enzymology”, vol.VI, Ed. by Colowick,S.P. 6. Nirenberg,M.W., in “Methods and Kaplan,N.O., Academic Press, New York, 17(1963) 7. De Vries,H., Agsteribbe,E. and Kroon,A.M., Biochim.Biophys.Acta, 246, 111(1971) 48, 1106(1972) 8. Malkin,L. I., Biochem.Biophys.Res.Commun., Kalousek,F. and Bosch,L., FEBS Letters, 12, 4(1970) 9. Talens,J., Van Diggelen,O.P., Brongers,M., Popa,L.M. and Bosch,L., 10. Talens,J., Eur. J. Biochem., in press II. Caton,J.E. and Goldstein,G., Anal.Biochem., 42, 14(1971) 12. Perry,R.P. and Kelley,D.E., J.Mol.Biol., 16, 255(1966) 13. Attardi,G. and Ojala,D., Nature New Biol., 229, 133(1971) 14. Borst,P. and Flavel1,R.A.. FEBS Symp., 28, l(1972) Synthesis and its Regulation”, 15. Spirin,A.S., in “The Mechanism of Protein North-Holland, Amsterdam, 515(1972) Ed. by Bosch,L., Van der Koogh,H.J.L. and Kroon,A.M., 8th FEBS Meeting, 16. De Vries,H., Amsterdam, 1972, abstr. 545
314