Accepted Manuscript Physicochemical characteristics, polyphenol compositions and antioxidant potential of pomegranate juices from 10 Chinese cultivars and the environmental factors analysis Xuan Li, Humaira Wasila, Linwei Liu, Tian Yuan, Zhongmei Gao, Beita Zhao, Imran Ahmad PII: DOI: Reference:
S0308-8146(14)01905-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.003 FOCH 16852
To appear in:
Food Chemistry
Received Date: Revised Date: Accepted Date:
27 July 2013 30 November 2014 2 December 2014
Please cite this article as: Li, X., Wasila, H., Liu, L., Yuan, T., Gao, Z., Zhao, B., Ahmad, I., Physicochemical characteristics, polyphenol compositions and antioxidant potential of pomegranate juices from 10 Chinese cultivars and the environmental factors analysis, Food Chemistry (2014), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem. 2014.12.003
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1
Physicochemical characteristics, polyphenol compositions and antioxidant
2
potential of pomegranate juices from 10 Chinese cultivars and the
3
environmental factors analysis
4
Xuan Li a, Humaira Wasila a, Linwei Liu*a, Tian Yuan a, Zhongmei Gao a, Beita Zhao
5
Imran Ahmad b
6 7
a
8
Shaanxi, China
9
b
College of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100,
College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
10 11 12
Running Title
13
Pomegranate juice polyphenol and environmental effects analysis
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
*Corresponding author, Contact information of corresponding author.
21
Linwei Liu: Tel: +86 029 87092486; E-mail address:
[email protected]
1
a
,
22
ABSTRACT
23
Various pomegranate cultivars are grown in several regions of China, but comparative
24
study of their juice polyphenols, antioxidant potentials, and health benefits are few. In the
25
present study, physicochemical characteristics, polyphenol compositions, and antioxidant
26
potentials of pomegranate aril juices from 10 cultivars in 4 Chinese regions were investigated.
27
The results showed that the soluble solid content, reducing sugar content, titratable acid
28
content of them were 13.97~16.30°Brix, 62.82~110.70g/L, 2.657~36.62g/L respectively. The
29
total polyphenols, flavonoids, tannin and anthocyanin concentrations were 3.15~7.43 mg
30
GaE/mL, 0.045~0.335 mg QuE/mL, 0.540~2.531 mg TaE/mL, and 0.004~0.160 mg CyE/mL
31
respectively. Sugar acid ratio, titratable acid content, total flavonoid concentration, and
32
DPPH· scavenging capacity were affected mainly by sweet and sour cultivar type, while
33
soluble solid content and total anthocyanin concentration were affected by environment.
34
Temperature in maturity period and latitude of growing region significantly effected on
35
polyphenol and antioxidant potential levels of pomegranate juice.
36
Key words: Pomegranate; sweet; sour; polyphenols; antioxidant capacity; environment
2
37
1. Introduction
38
Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) is one of the oldest health promoting fruits. It
39
originated in the Middle East, and has spread to Mediterranean, China and tropical and
40
subtropical countries around the world (Fadavi, Barzegar, Azizi, & Bayat, 2005). There are
41
over 1000 cultivars of pomegranate, classified by appearance and characteristics of fruit,
42
flower and tree (Sarkhosh, Zamani, Fatahi, & Ebadi, 2006). Generally, there are two varieties,
43
ornamental and edible pomegranate. The edible one is further divided into sweet and sour
44
types according to the taste of the juice (Hasnaoui, Mars, Ghaffari, Trifi, Melgarejo, &
45
Hernandez, 2011).
46
Attention on pomegranates and their products (juice, jelly, jam etc.) by both consumers
47
and researchers has increased because their consumption has been found to have several
48
medical benefits, such as prevention and treatment of cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes,
49
Alzheimer's, arthritis and colitis (Fuhrman, Volkova, & Aviram, 2005; Jurenka & Julie, 2008;
50
Viuda-Martos, Fernández-López, & Pérez-Álvarez, 2010; Landete, 2011).
51
Pomegranate aril, the edible part of the fruit, is rich in sugars, organic acids, vitamins,
52
minerals and polyphenols (Tehranifar, Zarei, Nemati, Esfandiyari, & Vazifeshenas, 2010).
53
Polyphenol is the major antioxidant and health functional factor found in pomegranate aril
54
and juice, and it mainly consists of ellagitannin (punicalagin), gallic acid, ellagic acid,
55
anthocyanins, catechins, caffeic acid, and quercetin (Viuda-Martos, et al. 2010). The
56
abundance of these compounds depends on cultivar type, climate, and growing region
57
(Melgarejo, Salazar, & Artes, 2000; Poyrazoğlu, Gökmen & Artιk, 2002). Until now, juice
58
polyphenols of many pomegranate cultivars in Iran, Turkey, the United States, Italy and South
3
59
Africa have been studied. However, a profile comparison of polyphenol composition and
60
antioxidant potential in sweet and sour pomegranates in different areas of China has not been
61
done prior to this study. Moreover, environmental conditions, regarded as the important factor
62
in synthesis and metabolism of polyphenols (Hättenschwiler, & Vitousek 2000), having effect
63
on juice polyphenol composition and antioxidant potential is rarely considered.
64
In the present study, 10 pomegranate cultivars from 4 growing regions of China were
65
studied for aril juices‟ physicochemical characteristics (soluble solid content, reducing sugar
66
content, titratable acid, and sugar acid ratio), polyphenol composition, and antioxidant
67
potential (total reducing capacity, DPPH• radical scavenging capacity, ABTS•+ radical
68
scavenging capacity and superoxide anion radical scavenging capacity). Meanwhile, the
69
relevance of environmental factors (longitude, latitude, altitude, temperature, precipitation and
70
insolation) to juice polyphenol composition and antioxidant potential were analyzed.
71
Furthermore, the effect of sweet and sour type (T), growing environment (E) and their
72
interaction (T×E) on aril juices‟ physicochemical characteristics, polyphenol composition
73
and antioxidant potential were analyzed by comparing the contribution rates of T, E, and T×
74
E that were calculated by the variances percentage of these aspects in 10 juices. These results
75
would provide new information to pomegranate growers, producers, researchers and
76
consumers.
77
2. Materials and methods
78
2.1 Materials and chemicals
79
2.1.1 Pomegranates
80
The tested pomegranates (Punica granatum L. Punicaceae) were 10 commercial
4
81
cultivars from Xinjiang (XJ), Yunnan (YN), Shandong (SD), and Shaanxi (SX) of China. In
82
each site, there are one kind of sour pomegranate (SSL) and at least one kind of sweet
83
pomegranate (TSL). We procured SSL and TSL from Xinjiang (XJ-SSL and XJ-TSL), SSL
84
and TSL from Shandong (SD-SSL and SD-TSL), SSL and TSL (including JPT and SBT) from
85
Shaanxi (SX-SSL, SX-JPT, and SX-SBT), and SSL and TSL (including SZ and LZ) from
86
Yunnan (YN-SSL, YN-LZ, and YN-SZ). The Latin names of these pomegranate varieties are
87
XJ-SSL (P. granatum L. cv. Kashisuan), XJ-TSL (P. granatum L. cv. Kashitian), SD-SSL (P.
88
granatum L. cv. Dahongpisuan), SD-TSL (P. granatum L. cv. Damaya.),
89
granatum L. cv. Suanlvzi), YN-LZ (P. granatum L. cv. Tianlvzi), YN-SZ (P. granatum L. cv.
90
Tianshazi), SX-SSL (P. granatum L. cv. Lintongsuan), SX-JPT(P. granatum L. cv. Jingpitian),
91
SX-SBT (P. granatum L. cv. Sanbaitian).
YN-SSL (P.
92
10 Fruits of each cultivar were picked in the same day (15th of October, 2012) from 10
93
trees in each orchard. Pomegranate fruits were packed and kept in the temperature of 4℃ and
94
relative humility of 85% by plastic atmosphere bags in shock proof cartons, and sent to our
95
laboratory by Air Express in 3 days.
96
being stored in a refrigeration storage with a temperature of 4 ℃ and relative humility of
97
85% for further use.
They were further cleaned and well-packaged before
98
For each pomegranate cultivar, 10 pomegranate fruits were randomly divided into 3
99
groups. From each group, one juice sample was obtained, and triplicate assays were
100
conducted for each juice sample.
101
2.1.2 Reagents and Standards
102
Folin–Ciocalteu
reagent,
Folin-Dennis
5
reagent,
aluminum
chloride,
potassium
103
ferricyanide, ferric chloride, 2,2`-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS+),
104
and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH·) are analytical reagent grade and purchased from
105
Sigma–Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, Missouri, USA). Gallic acid, punicalagin, catechin,
106
chlorogenic acid, epicatechin, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, ellagic acid, and kaempferol are
107
HPLC grade and purchased from Vick's biological Inc. (Chengdu, Sichuan, China). Distilled
108
water was used throughout.
109
2.2 Preparation of pomegranate juices and their polyphenol extracts
110
Pomegranates were processed into juices in lab after one week storage at 4 ℃. The
111
bottom and top of pomegranate fruits were removed before the fruit was soaked in potassium
112
permanganate solution (2%) for sterilization (5min). Arils were separated from the mesocarps
113
and epicarps, and squeezed by household juicer (Meidi, Guangdong, China) with seeds kept
114
intact to get the aril juice. The juices were centrifuged (4000rpm 10min) by SC-2456
115
Table-type centrifuge (Keda Innovation Co. LTD, Anhui, China) before storing them at -20℃
116
for further use.
117
Polyphenols of pomegranate juices were extracted and purified by aqueous two-phase
118
system. Briefly, 10mL of pomegranate juice was evenly mixed with 6mL of acetone before
119
adding 3.25g ammonium sulfate. The mixture was then treated with ultrasonic wave (30℃,
120
40kHz) by KQ-600DB ultrasonic instrument (Kunshan, Jiangsu, China) for 15min. When the
121
mixture separated into two phases, the supernatant was collected from the separating funnel
122
and dried by RE-52AA rotary evaporators (Yarong bio-instrument Co., Shanghai, China). The
123
dried substance was dissolved in 10ml methanol, and kept in -20℃ for further use.
124
2.3 Determination of chemical composition and physiochemical properties
6
125
The pH of the juice was measured using PHS-3C pH meter (INESA Scientific
126
Instrument Ltd. Co., Shanghai, China). Soluble solid content (SSC) was measured using WYT
127
handhold refractometer (Xingchen Company, Chengdu, China), with values being presented
128
as Brix degree. Titratable acid content (TAC) was determined according to the official method
129
(AOAC 1984). Briefly, a 10mL juice sample was titrated with sodium hydroxide standard
130
titration solution (0.1mol/L) to pH8.1 using a calibrated pH meter to monitor the pH. Results
131
were expressed as g citric acid per liter of sample. Total reducing sugar content (TRS) was
132
determined by the standard method (AOAC 1984). Specifically, a pretreated juice sample was
133
used to titrate 10mL standardized alkaline copper tartrate solution (calibrated by 1mg/mL
134
glucose standard solution) with a boiling time of 2min. Results were presented as g glucose
135
per liter of sample. Each measurement was conducted in triplicate.
136
2.4 Determination of polyphenol composition
137
2.4.1. Determination of total polyphenols concentration
138
The Folin-Ciocalteu method was used for total polyphenol concentration determination,
139
based on the optimized condition by Singleton, Orthofer and Lamuela-Raventos (1999) with
140
some modifications. Gallic acid was used as standard and distilled water was used as blank.
141
Briefly, 0.5mL of diluted juice (2mL juice sample was diluted into 10mL by distilled water)
142
was mixed with 0.5 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent before adding 3mL of sodium carbonate
143
solution (10%). Water was added to bring volume to 10 mL. The absorbance was read at
144
760nm after 30min reaction in dark place. Results were expressed as mg GaE (gallic acid
145
equivalent)/mL of pomegranate juice. Each juice sample was tested in triplicate.
146
2.4.2. Determination of total flavonoid concentration
7
147
Total flavonoid concentration was determined by the method established by Lin and
148
Tang (2007). Quercetin was used as the standard and distilled water as blank. The final
149
reaction mixture consisted of 0.2mL juice sample, 1.5mL of ethanol solution (95%), 0.1mL of
150
aluminium chloride (10%) and potassium acetate (1mol/L) and 2.8mL distilled water. The
151
absorbance was read at 415nm after 30 min reaction. Results were expressed as mg QuE
152
(quercetin equivalent)/mL of pomegranate juice. Each juice sample was measured in
153
triplicate.
154
2.4.3. Determination of total tannin concentration
155
Total tannin concentration was measured according to the previous reported method
156
(Schanderl, 1970) with some modification. Tannin acid was used as standard and distilled
157
water as the blank. Folin-Dennis reagent was prepared by refluxing the mixture of two
158
hydrated sodium tungstate dihydrate (100 g), phosphomolybdic acid (20g), H2O (750mL)
159
with phosphoric acid (50mL) in water bath for 2h, and diluted to1000mL after cooling down.
160
The final reaction mixture contained 1.0mL diluted sample (2mL juice sample was diluted
161
into 10mL by distilled water), 1.25mL Folin-Dennis reagent and 2.5mL sodium carbonate
162
solution (10%) solution. The mixture was brought to the volume of 25mL using distilled water.
163
Absorbance of the mixture was read at 700nm after 30min reaction in a dark place. The
164
results were expressed as mg TaE (tannin acid equivalent)/mL of pomegranate juice. Each
165
juice sample was measured in triplicate.
166
2.4.4. Determination of total anthocyanin concentration
167
Total anthocyanin concentration was measured by pH differential method (Giusti &
168
Wrolstad, 2001). Briefly, 0.5 mL of each sample was brought to pH1.0 by 4.5mL of KCl-HCl
8
169
solution (0.025mol/L) and to pH4.5 by 4.5mL of NaAc-HAc solution (0.4mol/L) respectively.
170
Absorbance of equilibrated reaction mixture solutions (~25 ℃ , 15min standing) were
171
measured at 510nm and at 700nm respectively using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer at ambient
172
temperature with distilled water as blank. Results were expressed as mg CyE
173
(cyanidin-3-glucoside equivalent)/mL juice. Each juice sample was tested in triplicate.
174
2.4.5. Analysis of polyphenol monomers
175
HPLC analysis was conducted to evaluate the punicalagin, gallic acid, and other
176
polyphenol concentrations in pomegranate juices. HPLC system (Shimadzu, Japan) was
177
equipped with auto-sampler, SPD-M20A diode array detector (280nm, 30℃), and C18
178
reversed phase column with 250×21.1 mm i.d., 5µm particle size and 125 Å pore size
179
(Promosil Agela Technologies, USA). The mobile phase consisted of methanol (solvent B)
180
and 1% acetic acid solution (solvent A). The mobile phase flowed at a speed of 0.8mL /min.
181
The gradient procedure was optimized as follows: the solvent B was run from 15% to 25% in
182
first 15min, 25% for 10min, from 25% to 75% in the following 40min and returned to 15% in
183
15min, keeping another 5min at last. The injection volume of standard or sample solution was
184
15 μL. Standard solution was prepared by quantitatively dissolving polyphenol standards into
185
methanol. Pomegranate polyphenol sample solution was prepared as mentioned above (in the
186
2.2). Both of them were filtered through a 0.22um membrane filter before injection. Each
187
sample was measured in triplicate. The individual polyphenol compound of the sample was
188
identified by retention time and quantified by peak area.
189
2.5 Determination of antioxidant potential
190
2.5.1. Assay of total reducing capacity
9
191
Total reducing capacity (TRC) was assayed using the previous reported method
192
(Ferreira, Baptista, Vilas-Boas, & Barros, 2007). Specifically, 1.0 mL of diluted sample (2mL
193
juice sample was diluted into 10 mL by distilled water), 2.5mL of sodium phosphate buffer
194
(0.2 mol/L, pH 6.6) and potassium ferrocyanide solution
195
water bath for 20min. When trichloroacetic acid solution (10%, 2.5mL) was added and mixed,
196
then 2.5mL of the reaction solution was mixed with 2.5mL of distilled water and 1.0mL of
197
ferric trichloride solution (0.1%), vortexed and kept still for 10min. Absorbance was read at
198
700nm. Distilled water was used as the blank. Gallic acid and ascorbic acid were used as
199
references. The results were expressed as mg GaE (gallic acid equivalent)/L juice and mg VcE
200
(ascorbic acid equivalent)/L juice respectively. Each juice sample was tested in triplicate.
201
2.5.2. Assays of free radical scavenging capacity
(1 %) were mixed and kept at 50℃
202
DPPH radical scavenging capacity (DRSC) was conducted according to the method
203
described by Villano, Fernández-Pachón, Moyá, Troncoso, and García-Parrilla (2007) with
204
some modification. Briefly, 1.0mL of diluted sample (2mL juice sample was diluted into
205
10mL by distilled water) was mixed with 4.0mL of DPPH• ethanolic solution. Absorbance at
206
520nm was recorded after 10min. An ethanol solution instead of DPPH• working solution was
207
used as the control and distilled water instead of sample as the blank.
208
ABTS radical scavenging capacity (ARSC) was determined by the method established
209
by Re, Pellegrini, Proteggente, Pannala, Yang, and Rice-Evans (1999). Briefly, the final
210
reaction mixture consisted of 50uL diluted sample (2mL juice sample was diluted into 10 mL
211
by distilled water) and 4.0mL ABTS•+ working solution (5mL of 7mmol/L ABTS solution
212
reacts with 88uL of 140mmol/L potassium persulfate solution, and then the reaction solution
10
213
was diluted with ethanol to the absorbance of 0.700±0.002 at 734nm). The absorbance of the
214
final reaction mixture was measured at 734 nm. 4.0 mL of ethanol instead of ABTS•+ working
215
solution was used as the control and distilled water instead of sample as the blank.
216
Superoxide anion scavenging capacity (SASC) was tested using the method described by
217
Zhang, Chen, Li, Pei, and Liang (2010) with some modification. Specifically, 5.6 mL of
218
Tris–HCl buffer solution (0.05mol/L, pH 8.2) mixed with 0.5mL diluted sample (2 mL juice
219
sample was diluted into 10 mL by distilled water), followed by the addition of 0.4ml of
220
pyrogallol solution (0.06mol/L). The mixture was incubated at 37℃ for 4min and the
221
reaction was stopped by adding 3 drops of hydrochloric acid (10mol/L). The mixture was then
222
brought to volume of 10mL with distilled water before reading absorbance at 320nm. Distilled
223
water instead of diluted juice was used as the blank, and 0.4mL of distilled water instead of
224
pyrogallol solution as the control.
225
For the three free radical scavenging capacity assays, the scavenging capacity (SC) was
226
calculated by using the following equation: SC= [1-(Asample–Acontrol)/( Ablank–Acontrol)]×100.
227
and the analytical gallic acid and ascorbic acid were used as references. The results were
228
expressed as mg GaE (gallic acid equivalent)/L juice and mg VcE (ascorbic acid equivalent)/L
229
juice respectively. Each juice sample was tested in triplicate.
230
2.6 Environment information
231
Geographic information, including longitude, latitude and altitude of each location, was
232
provided by National Geomatics center of China. Meteorological data came from China
233
meteorological Data Sharing Service System, containing precipitation (millimeter), insolation
234
(hours) and temperature during pomegranate maturity and harvest time (September and
11
235
October) in 2012. Among them, the overall average temperature is the daily average
236
temperature in the period of the pomegranate maturity and harvest and the temperature
237
difference is the difference of the daily average absolute high temperature and daily average
238
absolute low temperature. The detailed environmental information is listed in Table1.
239
2.7 Statistical analysis
240
DPS (Version Rel.6.55, for Windows, 1997) was used for statistical analysis. Correlation
241
analyses were performed using a two-tailed Pearson‟s correlation test. Difference between
242
means was compared by Turkey‟s HSD post hoc test. General linear model (GLM) was used
243
with cultivar type (2 levels) and growing environment (4 levels) as fixed factors.
244
3. Results and discussion
245
3.1 Physicochemical characteristics of pomegranate juices from 10 Chinese cultivars
246 247
Physicochemical characteristics of pomegranate juices from 10 Chinese cultivars are listed in Table2.
248
The SSC level of pomegranate juices ranged from 13.97 to 16.30°Brix, This is close to
249
13.80 ~16.57°Brix of 15 cultivars in Georgia reported by Rajasekar, Akoh, Martino, and
250
MacLean (2012), and 11.37~ 15.07°Brix of 20 cultivars in Iran reported by Tehranifar et al.
251
(2010), but lower than 15.77~19.56°Brix of 6 cultivars in Iran reported by Zarei, Azizi, and
252
Bashiri-Sadr (2010) and 16.0~19.0°Brix of 13 cultivars in Turkey reported by Poyrazoğlu et
253
al. (2002). However, compared to 14.0°Brix, the minimum value proposed by Association of
254
the Industry of Juice and Nectars (AIJN) provisional reference guideline for pomegranate
255
juice, only YN-LZ and SXJPT juices were not met. SSC level of most pomegranate juices in
256
present research had significant difference (p<0.05), which is consistent with the results
12
257
reported by Rajasekar et al. (2012). It means SSC of pomegranate juice is influenced by
258
multiple factors such as cultivar, growing region and maturity. Moreover, Xinjiang and
259
Shandong sweet pomegranate juices had higher SSC than sour ones, whereas Shaanxi and
260
Yunnan sweet pomegranate had lower SSC than sour ones. It means that SSC levels of
261
pomegranate juices were closely related to cultivar type, and partly related to growing regions.
262
SSC levels of Shandong pomegranate juices were significantly higher than that of Xinjiang
263
(p<0.05). SSC levels of Shaanxi and Yunnan pomegranate juices were significantly lower
264
(p<0.05) and statistically equal with each other (p<0.05).
265
Reducing sugar content (RSC) of the 10 pomegranate juices ranged from 62.82 g/L to
266
110.7g/L, which was lower than 126.1g/L (average value) of Spainish pomegranate juices
267
reported by Melgarejo et al. (2000), 150g/L (average value) of Tunisia pomegranate juices
268
reported by Elfalleh et al. (2009) and 154g/L (average value) of Ganesh cultivar pomegranate
269
juice reported by Kulkarni and Aradhya (2005). Table 2 also showed that sweet pomegranate
270
juices had higher reducing sugar content than sour ones except those in Yunnan sour
271
pomegranate juice had highest RSC among the 10 juices, which is partly consistent with the
272
previous results reported by Melgarejo et al. (2000). Moreover, Xinjiang pomegranate juices
273
had lower reducing sugar contents than that of Yunnan, Shaanxi and Shandong pomegranate
274
juices. It means that high altitude may be unfavorable to the production of reducing sugar in
275
pomegranate juices. What is more, reducing sugar content difference among juices of the 10
276
cultivars was mainly caused by different maturity level that closely related to the
277
environmental conditions during maturation period. This supposition is also supported by a
278
report (Kulkarni & Aradhya, 2005) that showed fully matured pomegranates developed the
13
279
highest total sugar which might be attributed to hydrolysis of starch into simple sugar.
280
Titratable acid content (TAC) of the 10 Chinese pomegranate juices varied from 2.657 to
281
36.62g/L (citric acid). It is higher than 1.3~29.7g (citric acid)/L of Georgia pomegranate
282
juices reported by Rajasekar et al. (2012), 1.0~24.0 g (malic acid)/L of Tunisian pomegranate
283
juices reported by Zaouay, Mena, Garcia-Viguera, and Mars (2012), and 3.3 to 24.4 g (citric
284
acid)/L of Iran pomegranate juices reported by Tehranifar et al. (2010). TAC of pomegranate
285
juices from the 10 cultivars were significantly different (p<0.05). Specifically, sour
286
pomegranate juices had much higher TAC than sweet ones, such as Xinjiang sour
287
pomegranate juice was about 6.4 times higher than sweet one, Shandong sour pomegranate
288
juice was 4.7 times higher than sweet one, Yunnan sour pomegranate juice was 4.7 and 3.7
289
times higher than two sweet ones, and Shaanxi sour pomegranate juice was 8.0 to13.0 times
290
higher than two sweet ones. It means that sweet and sour cultivar types is the key determinant
291
of titratable acid content of pomegranate juice, and growing environment also play a role on
292
it.
293
SSC: TAC is generally used to quantify the juice taste (Rajasekar et al., 2012) and as a
294
maturity index (Zaouay et al., 2012). Because total sugar content (TSC) is more accurate than
295
SSC to explain sweet degree of the juice, sugar-acid ratio (SAR) defined as TSC: TAC, was
296
used in this paper to indicate the sweet-sour feature of juice. As shown in Table 2, SAR value
297
ranged from 15.98 to 37.08 in sweet pomegranate juices, and ranged from 1.48 to 5.78 in sour
298
pomegranate juices. This is one reason for palatable sweet pomegranate juice widely used in
299
juice products while sour pomegranate juice mainly used as medicinal fruit in China. SAR
300
values were significantly (p<0.05) different among sweet pomegranate juices, while the SAR
14
301
value difference of sour pomegranate juices is not significant (p>0.05). It means that taste is
302
more variable among the juices of sweet pomegranate cultivars than that of sour pomegranate
303
cultivars.
304
3.2 Polyphenol composition of pomegranate juices from 10 Chinese cultivars
305
Total polyphenols concentration (TPC) of the 10 pomegranate juices varied from 3.15 to
306
7.43 mg GaE/mL, which fall into the range of 2.602~10.086 mg GaE/mL of Turkish
307
commercial pomegranate juices reported by Tezcan, Gültekin-Özgüven, Diken, Özçelik, and
308
Erim (2009), and 2.376~9.304 mg GaE/mL of Iran pomegranate juices reported by
309
Mousavinejad, Emam-Djomeh, Rezaei, and Khodaparast (2009), but higher than 2.083~3.436
310
mg GaE/mL of Turkish pomegranate aril juices reported by Çam, Hışıl, and Durmaz (2009),
311
and is about 10 times higher than 0.272~0.849 mg GaE/mL of Georgia pomegranate aril
312
juices reported by Rajasekar et al. (2012). It indicates that total polyphenol level of
313
pomegranate juice vary greatly among different cultivars and different growing regions in the
314
world. As Table 2 showed, the highest TPC was found in SD-TSL pomegranate juice,
315
sequentially followed by XJ-SSL, SX-SSL, SX-SBT, SD-SSL, XJ-TSL, SX-JPT, YN-SSL,
316
YN-SZ and YN-LZ. It can be deduced from the sequence that total polyphenol concentration
317
of pomegranate juice is related to growing environment and cultivar, but not related to sweet
318
and sour types.
319
Flavonoids ubiquitously exist in plants, known to possess antiviral, anti-inflammatory,
320
antitumor and antioxidant potentials and thought to be a kind of phytoestrogens. Although
321
luteolin, kaempferol, and quercetin had been detected in pomegranate peel extract, no
322
flavonoid was detected in pomegranate juice from any Iranian cultivars by Mousavinejad et 15
323
al. (2009). While in the present work, total flavonoids were detected in the 10 pomegranate
324
aril juices and total flavonoid concentration (TFC) of them were in the range of 0.045~0.335
325
mg QuE /mL. SDTSL still ranked in first place, followed by that of SX-JPT, SX-SBT,
326
YN-SSL, XJ-TSL, YN-SZ, SD-SSL, YN-LZ, SX-SSL and XJ-SSL. Xinjiang, Shandong and
327
Shaanxi sweet pomegranate juices had higher TFC than their sour counterparts, but Yunnan
328
sweet pomegranates had lower TFC than their sour cultivar. These indicate that TFC of
329
pomegranate aril juice is closely related to sweet and sour cultivar and growing region.
330
Moreover, it is also affected by pomegranate maturity level as report by Kulkarni et al.
331
(2005).
332
Tannin has been known having good antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative
333
activities as studied by Seeram, N.P. et al. (2005). Tannin level in pomegranate juice can be a
334
good indicator for its nutritional quality. Table 2 shows that total tannin concentration (TTC)
335
of pomegranate juices from the ten cultivars varied from 0.54 to 2.531 mg TaE/mL. It was
336
similar to 0.640~2.699 mg/mL of the 4 pomegranate juices from “wonderful” cultivar
337
reported by Gil, Tomás-Barberán, Hess-Pierce, Holcroft, and Kader, (2000), but higher than
338
0.15~0.32 mg/mL of the pomegranate juices from 8 cultivars of Iran reported by
339
Mousavinejad et al. (2009). These differences may be caused by the difference of cultivar
340
type, climate, edaphic condition, maturity, and especially tannin determination method among
341
these researches. TTC of the 10 pomegranate juices in the present work were significantly
342
different with each other. TTC sequential order of 10 pomegranate juices was consistent with
343
that of TPC, which means tannins were the main polyphenols in pomegranate juice, and TTC
344
level and TPC level of the juice were affected by similar factors, including growth
16
345
environment, cultivar, and maturity etc.
346
The appealing color of pomegranate juice, an important index for juice quality and
347
popularity, is mainly attributed to anthocyanin concentration. And healthy functions of
348
anthocyanin have been widely recognized and studied (Stinzing, & Carle 2004). Total
349
anthocyanin concentration (TAC) of the 10 pomegranate juices varied from 0.004 to 0.160 mg
350
CyE/mL. The data is lower than 0.004~0.419 mg CyE /mL of Georgia pomegranate aril juices
351
reported by Rajasekar et al.(2012), 0.081~0.369 mg CyE /mL of Turkey pomegranate aril
352
juices reported by Çam et al. (2009), and 0.055~0.301 mg CyE /mL of Iran pomegranate aril
353
juices reported by Tehranifar et al.( 2010). It indicates that the considerable variation of total
354
anthocyanin level of pomegranate juice around the world was related to the differences of
355
cultivars and growing environment. Total anthocyanin concentration of the 10 cultivars were
356
in the order of XJ-TSL>XJ-SSL>SX-SSL>SX-JPT>SD-SSL=YN-SZ≈YN-SSL>SD-TSL>
357
YN-LZ>SX-SBT. Significant differences (p<0.05) were observed in most of the 10
358
pomegranate juices except SD-SSL, YN-SZ and YN-SSL. These may be caused by different
359
cultivars and different maturity level of the pomegranate, since it has been proved that
360
maturity degree greatly effects the total anthocyanin concentration of pomegranate arils
361
(Fawole et al. 2013, & Kulkarni et al. 2005).
362
3.3 Polyphenol monomers of pomegranate juices from 10 Chinese cultivars
363
Polyphenol profiles of 10 pomegranate juices are showed in HPLC chromatogram in Fig2.
364
The measured concentrations of punicalagin, gallic acid, catechin, chlorogenic acid, caffeic
365
acid, epicatechin, ferulic acid, ellagic acid, and kaempferol in the 10 pomegranate juices were
366
listed in Table 3. Punicalagin concentration of the 10 pomegranate juices ranged from 298.99
17
367
to 1042.93ug/mL, which was the primary polyphenol in pomegranate juices of the ten
368
cultivars. This result is similar to the conclusion of Fischer, Carle, and Kammerer (2011), and
369
Gil et al. (2000) that punicalagin and other hydrolyzable tannins were the richest polyphenol
370
compounds in pomegranate aril juice. Concentrations of the phenolic acids in each juice
371
tested in the present work were all significantly different with each other. They were in the
372
order of chlorogenic acid>gallic acid>caffeic acid>ferulic acid>ellagic acid. The
373
inconsistencies in concentration of individual phenolic acid in various cultivars was also
374
found by other researchers (Gundogdu, & Yilmaz 2012; Fischer, Carle, & Kammerer 2011;
375
Lansky & Newman 2007; Gil et al. 2000). These differences were caused not only by
376
differences of cultivar, growing region and maturity level of the tested pomegranate, but also
377
by the difference in analytical methods used. In addition, some flavonoid compounds had
378
been detected in all the 10 juices, which are in agreement with previous work (Wang, Ding,
379
Liu, Xiang, & Du 2010). Flavonoid concentrations of the juices were significantly different
380
with each other; among which epicatechin and catechin were the dominant flavonoid,
381
followed by kaempferol. It has been reported that pomegranate juice anthocyanins consist of
382
65 constituents and some adducts, including some unusual cyanidin, pelargonidin, delphinidin,
383
and pelargonidin in “wonderful” pomegranate (Sentandreu, Cerdán-Calero, & Sendra 2013).
384
While anthocyanin monomers of 10 pomegranate juices were not discussed in present work
385
since anthocyanin standards were insufficient.
386
3.4 Antioxidant potential of pomegranate juices from 10 Chinese cultivars
387
Four in vitro assays were used by complementary means to evaluate the antioxidant
388
potential of pomegranate juices from 10 cultivars, as shown in Figure 1. TRC of the 10
18
389
pomegranate juices were in the order of SD-TSL>XJ-SSL>SX-SBT>SX-SSL>SD-SSL>XJ-TSL≈
390
YN-SSL>SX-JPT>YN-SZ>YN-LZ. DRSC were in the order of SD-TSL≈XJ-SSL>SD-SSL≈SX-SBT≈
391
SX-SSL>YN-SSL>XJ-TSL>SX-JPT>YN-SZ>YN-LZ. ARSC were in the order of SD-TSL>XJ-SSL>
392
SX-SSL>SD-SSL≈SX-SBT>YN-SSL≈XJ-TSL>SX-JPT>YN-SZ>YN-LZ. SASC were in the order of
393
XJ-SSL>SD-TSL>SX-SSL>SD-SSL>XJ-TSL ≈YN-LZ ≈ YN-SZ ≈ YN-SSL>SX-SBT ≈ SX-JPL. These
394
sequential orders indicate that Shandong and Xinjiang pomegranate juices had higher
395
antioxidant potentials than Shaanxi and Yunnan pomegranate juices. Moreover, antioxidant
396
potential sequential orders of the 10 pomegranate aril juices were similar to their total
397
polyphenol concentration sequential order as shown in 3.2. This means antioxidant potential
398
of pomegranate juice mainly relies on its polyphenol levels.
399
TRC of the 10 pomegranate juices were significantly different (p<0.05) except XJ-TSL
400
and YN-SSL had same TRC level. DRSC of pomegranate juices from SD-TSL, SD-SSL,
401
XJ-SSL, SX-SBT, SX-SSL and YN-SSL had no significant difference (p>0.05) , while other 5
402
cultivars were significantly lower (p<0.05) than them. ARSC of the 10 pomegranate juices
403
were not significantly different (p>0.05) except SD-TSL, XJ-SSL had significantly higher
404
ARSC and Yunnan sweet ones had significantly lower ARSC. SASC of the pomegranate
405
juices from 3 Yunnan cultivars were not significantly different (p>0.05) from each other.
406
SASC of Xinjiang and Shaanxi sour pomegranate juices were significantly higher (p<0.05)
407
than their sweet counterparts, but SASC of Shandong sour pomegranate juice was
408
significantly lower (p<0.05) than that of sweet one. These results were consistent with the
409
results by Zaouay et al. (2012), but did not show that sour pomegranates consistently had
410
higher antioxidant potentials than sweet pomegranates.
19
411
The correlation analysis showed that, punicalagin concentration of the tested pomegranate
412
juice positively correlated with the 4 antioxidant capacites (p<0.01) and concentrations of
413
caffeic acid and ferulic acid (p<0.05). That means punicalagin is the most important
414
antioxidant in pomegranate aril juices. Catechin, caffeic acid and ferulic acid concentrations
415
were all positively correlated with ARSC (p<0.05), and caffeic acid concentration was also
416
positively correlated with DRSC (p<0.05). That means each polyphenol in pomegranate juice
417
have pertinence on certain free radical and redox system and they play the antioxidant
418
function by synergistic effect. Interestingly, kaempferol was negatively correlated with ferulic
419
acid concentration (p<0.05), and DRSC (p<0.05). None of other detected phenolic monomers
420
was correlation significant with antioxidant capacities (p>0.05). Across all examined
421
antioxidant capacities, TRC significantly correlated with DRSC, ARSC and SASC (p<0.01),
422
while ARSC significantly correlated with DRSC and SASC respectively (p<0.01).
423
3.5 The effect of environmental factors on polyphenol composition and antioxidant capacities
424
The correlation among each environmental factor and pomegranate juices polyphenol
425
compositions and antioxidant capacities were exhibited in Table 4. There were negative
426
correlations of overall average temperature with total polyphenol concentration, total tannin
427
concentration and punicalagin concentration (p<0.05). This means the lower average
428
temperature during maturity and harvest period could promote the primary polyphenols
429
accumulation in pomegranate arils. Moreover, the significant negative correlation (p<0.05)
430
among overall average temperature with TRC and DRSC suggested that lower temperature
431
during the maturity and harvest time were favorable to increase total reducing capacity and
432
DPPH radical scavenging capacity of pomegranate juice. Temperature differences positively
20
433
correlated with SASC (r=0.62, p< 0.05), indicating that formation of anti superoxide anion
434
components in pomegranate arils were related to high temperature difference during maturity
435
and harvest time. Latitude positively correlated with total polyphenol concentration, total
436
reducing capacity and DPPH radical scavenging capacity (p<0.05), while longitude negatively
437
correlated with total anthocyanin concentration (p<0.05), which indicated that Chinese
438
pomegranate grown in high latitude and low longitude region is favored to accumulate more
439
polyphenols and higher antioxidant potential in its aril juice. In addition, precipitation and
440
insolation had no apparent effects on phenolics composition and antioxidant capacities of
441
pomegranate juices. As far as we know, the regulating and controlling factors of fruit
442
polyphenols remain undetermined, because the factors, ranging from intrinsic genetic to
443
various extrinsic environmental and their interactions, for polyphenol production among
444
cultivars varied through time and space (Hättenschwiler, & Vitousek 2000).
445
3.6 The effect of cultivar type (T), environment (E) and their interaction (T×E) on
446
physicochemical characteristics, polyphenol compositions and antioxidant potential of
447
pomegranate juice
448
The effects of sweet and sour pomegranate type (T), growth environment (E) and their
449
interaction (T×E) on physiochemical characteristics, polyphenol compositions and antioxidant
450
capacities of pomegranate juice were summarized in Table 5. It can be seen that E showed
451
significant contribution to SSC and the proportions of variance were 79.45% (P<0.001).
452
52.77% variance of RSC was explained by T×E, followed by 43.70% explained by E and
453
3.52% explained by T. Moreover, T accounted for 86.17% and 94.96% (p<0.001) variation in
454
TAC and SAR, followed by E and T×E interaction. In brief, soluble solid content and
21
455
reducing sugar content of pomegranate juices was growing environment dependent, whereas
456
titratable acid content and sugar acid ratio were mainly affected by sweet and sour cultivar
457
type. It can be inferred that the 10 pomegranate fruits from 4 growing regions may have
458
different maturity level when harvested at same time, since their environment conditions were
459
different, which subsequently impacted reducing sugar content, soluble solid content and
460
titratable acid content of the pomegranate juices.
461
T×E interaction explained the largest variation of total polyphenols concentration
462
(52.95%, p<0.001) and tannins concentration (54.35%, p<0.001), followed by E (46.82%,
463
45.59%, p<0.001). However, E explained more variation of total anthocyanin concentration
464
(90.32%, p<0.001) and T explained more variation in flavonoids concentration (61.11%,
465
p<0.001). It indicates that accumulation of total polyphenols and tannins in pomegranate juice
466
were related to multi factors. Total anthocyanin level of pomegranate juice was proved to be
467
closely related to maturity degree that was mostly determined by environmental conditions in
468
present work, because the 10 pomegranate samples picked simultaneously from different
469
growing regions may have different maturity levels. Total flavonoid level was mainly
470
determined by sweet and sour cultivar type, which can be proved by the results that all sweet
471
pomegranate juice had higher total flavonoids concentration than sour counterparts except
472
Yunnan sour pomegranate juice had higher total flavonoids than that of sweet pomegranate
473
cultivars. TRC of pomegranate juice were affected more by E than T and T×E interaction,
474
whereas ARSC and SASC were more susceptible to T×E interaction than E and T.
475
Specifically, E contributed 45.25%, 45.58% and 33.97% (p<0.001) of variances to TRC,
476
ARSC and SASC respectively. T×E explained 44.44%, 54.24% and 60.76% (p<0.001) of
22
477
variances in TRC, ARSC and SASC respectively. Additionally, majority variation of DRSC
478
was attributed to T (64.25%, p<0.001), followed by E (20.00%, p<0.001) and T×E interaction
479
(15.75%, p<0.001). In brief, antioxidant capacities of pomegranate juice were affected
480
significantly by environment than sweet and sour types, implying that adjusting planting
481
condition during pomegranate mature and harvest period will improve antioxidant potential of
482
pomegranate juice.
483
Several researches have investigated the effect of cultivar, maturity, and irrigation
484
conditions on titratable acid content, soluble solid content, total polyphenol concentration,
485
total anthocyanin concentration, and antioxidant potential of pomegranate juice (Shwartz et al.
486
2009; Borochov-Neori et al. 2009; Gundogdu, et al. 2012). Their results showed that soluble
487
solid content, TSS/TA ratio and total anthocyanin concentration of the pomegranate aril juice
488
were increased through half-ripe to full-ripe stages, while titratable acid content, total
489
polyphenol concentration and antioxidant potential were decreased in the same period
490
(Fawole and Opara 2013). Deficit irrigation in the early maturity period led to an increase in
491
total polyphenol concentration and total anthocyanin concentration in pomegranate arils, but
492
led to a reduction in fruit size and yield (Mellisho et al. 2012). New results from our research
493
are as follow: low average temperature and widely variable temperature differences during
494
maturity and harvest time are key determinants for primary polyphenols production and
495
antioxidant potential improvement. One possible explanation for these results is under these
496
conditions, carbon should be preferentially allocated to the synthesis of primary metabolites,
497
the amount of which are not detrimental but promote the synthesis of carbon-based secondary
498
metabolites, primarily polyphenols. Therefore, this paper may assist pomegranate growers to
23
499
improve juice nutritional properties by selecting more suitable cultivars and adjusting better
500
growing conditions.
501
4
Conclusion
502
In general, pomegranate juices from 10 representative Chinese cultivars had different
503
physicochemical characteristics and polyphenol compositions. Polyphenol compositions and
504
antioxidant potential of pomegranate juice significantly related to the average temperature and
505
daily temperature difference during maturity and harvest period. And they were also related to
506
the altitude, latitude and longitude of growing regions to some extent.
507
Further study is needed to build up a database for pomegranate juices that include
508
physiochemical characteristics, polyphenol compositions, antioxidant potentials and their
509
correlation to key environmental factors in different growing regions around the world. The
510
database would help producers make better products with high nutritional value, better
511
physicochemical properties and added antioxidants. This database may lead to geographic
512
pomegranate product labeling and brand identification.
513
5
Acknowledgements
514
The authors would like to acknowledge College of Food Science and Engineering,
515
Northwest A&F University for the timely equipment support and instruction. We are grateful
516
to teachers and students who contribute to this work.
517 518
Reference
519
Borochov-Neori, H., Judeinstein, S., Tripler, E., Harari, M., Greenberg, A., Shomer, I., &
520
Holland, D., (2009). Seasonal and cultivar variations in antioxidant and sensory
24
521
quality of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) fruit. Journal of Food Composition and
522
Analysis 22(3): 189-195.
523 524 525
Çam, M., Hışıl, Y., & Durmaz, G. (2009). Classification of eight pomegranate juices based on antioxidant capacity measured by four methods. Food chemistry, 112(3), 721-726. Elfalleh, W., Nasri, N., Marzougui, N., Thabti, I., M'rabet, A., Yahya, Y.,
Lachiheb, B.,
526
Guasmi, F., and Ferchichi, A. (2009). Physico-chemical properties and DPPH-ABTS
527
scavenging activity of some local pomegranate (Punica granatum) ecotypes.
528
International journal of food sciences and nutrition 60(S2): 197-210.
529
Fadavi, A., Barzegar, M., Azizi, M.H., & Bayat, M. (2005). Note. Physicochemical
530
composition of ten pomegranate cultivars (Punica granatum L.) grown in Iran. Food
531
science and technology international, 11(2), 113-119.
532
Fawole, O.A., & Opara, U.L., (2013a). Changes in physical properties, chemical and
533
elemental composition and antioxidant capacity of pomegranate (cv. Ruby) fruit at
534
five maturity stages. Scientia Horticulturae 150: 37-46.
535
Fawole, O.A., &Opara, U.L., (2013b). Effects of maturity status on biochemical content,
536
polyphenol composition and antioxidant capacity of pomegranate fruit arils
537
(cv.„Bhagwa‟). South African Journal of Botany 85: 23-31.
538
Ferreira, I. CFR., Baptista, P., Vilas-Boas, M., & Barros, L. (2007). Free-radical scavenging
539
capacity and reducing power of wild edible mushrooms from northeast Portugal:
540
Individual cap and stipe activity. Food Chemistry, 100(4), 1511-1516.
541
Fischer, U.A., Carle, R., & Kammerer, D.R. (2011). Identification and quantification of
542
phenolic compounds from pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel, mesocarp, aril and
25
543
differently produced juices by HPLC-DAD–ESI/MSn, Food chemistry, 127(2),
544
807-821.
545
Fuhrman, B., Volkova, N., & Aviram, M. (2005). Pomegranate juice inhibits oxidized LDL
546
uptake and cholesterol biosynthesis in macrophages. Journal of nutritional
547
biochemistry, 16(9), 570-576.
548
Gil, M.I., Tomás-Barberán, F.A., Hess-Pierce, B., Holcroft, D.M., & Kader, A.A. (2000).
549
Antioxidant activity of pomegranate juice and its relationship with phenolic
550
composition and processing. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 48(10),
551
4581-4589.
552 553 554
Giusti, M.M. & Wrolstad, R.E. (2001). Characterization and measurement of anthocyanins by UV- visible spectroscopy. Current protocols in food analytical chemistry. Gundogdu, M. & Yilmaz, H.
(2012). Organic acid, phenolic profile and antioxidant
555
capacities of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars and selected genotypes.
556
Scientia Horticulturae 143: 38-42.
557
Hasnaoui, N., Mars, M., Ghaffari, S., Trifi, M., Melgarejo, P., & Hernandez, F. (2011). Seed
558
and juice characterization of pomegranate fruits grown in Tunisia: Comparison
559
between sour and sweet cultivars revealed interesting properties for prospective
560
industrial applications. Industrial Crops and Products, 33(2), 374-381.
561 562 563 564
Hättenschwiler, S., &Vitousek, P. M., (2011). The role of polyphenols in terrestrial ecosystem nutrient cycling. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15(6), 238-243. Jurenka, J. (2008). Therapeutic applications of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.): a review. Alternative medicine review, 13(2), 128-144.
26
565 566
Kulkarni, A.P., & Aradhya, S.M. (2005). Chemical changes and antioxidant activity in pomegranate arils during fruit development. Food Chemistry, 93(2), 319-324.
567
Landete, J. M. (2011). Ellagitannins, ellagic acid and their derived metabolites: a review about
568
source, metabolism, functions and health. Food Research International, 44(5),
569
1150-1160.
570
Lansky, E. P., Newman, R.A.(2007). Punica granatum (pomegranate) and its potential for
571
prevention and treatment of inflammation and cancer. Journal of ethnopharmacology,
572
109(2), 177-206.
573
Lin, J.Y., & Tang, C.Y. (2007). Determination of total phenolic and flavonoid contents in
574
selected fruits and vegetables, as well as their stimulatory effects on mouse splenocyte
575
proliferation. Food Chemistry, 101 (1), 140-147.
576
Melgarejo, P., Salazar, D.M., & Artes, F. (2000). Organic acids and sugars composition of
577
harvested pomegranate fruits. European Food Research and Technology, 211(3),
578
185-190.
579
Mellisho, CD., Egea, I., Galindo, A., Rodríguez, P., Rodríguez, J., Conejero, W., Romojaro, F.,
580
& Torrecillas, A.
(2012). Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) fruit response to
581
different deficit irrigation conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 114, 30-36.
582
Mousavinejad, G., Emam-Djomeh, Z., Rezaei, K., Khodaparast, M.H.H. (2009). Identification
583
and quantification of phenolic compounds and their effects on antioxidant activity in
584
pomegranate juices of eight Iranian cultivars. Food Chemistry, 115(4), 1274-1278.
585
Poyrazoğlu, E., Gökmen, V., & Artιk, N. (2002). Organic acids and phenolic compounds in
586
pomegranates (Punica granatum L.) grown in Turkey. Journal of food composition and
27
587
analysis, 15(5), 567-575.
588
Rajasekar, D., Akoh, C.C., Martino, K.G., & MacLean, D.D. (2012). Physico-chemical
589
characteristics of juice extracted by blender and mechanical press from pomegranate
590
cultivars grown in Georgia. Food Chemistry, 133(4), 1383-1393.
591
Re, R., Pellegrini, N., Proteggente, A., Pannala, A., Yang, M., & Rice-Evans, C. (1999).
592
Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay.
593
Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 26(9), 1231-1237.
594
Sarkhosh, A., Zamani, Z., Fatahi, R., & Ebadi, A. (2006). RAPD markers reveal
595
polymorphism among some Iranian pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genotypes.
596
Scientia Horticulturae, 111(1), 24-29.
597 598 599
Schanderl, S.H. (1970). Tannins and related phenolics. Methods in Food Analysis. Academic, New York, 701-724. Seeram, N.P., Adams, L.S., Henning, S.M., Niu, Y., Zhang, Y., Nair, M.G., & Heber, D. (2005).
600
In vitro antiproliferative, apoptotic and antioxidant activities of punicalagin, ellagic
601
acid and a total pomegranate tannin extract are enhanced in combination with other
602
polyphenols as found in pomegranate juice. The Journal of nutritional biochemistry,
603
16(6), 360-367.
604
Sentandreu, E., Cerdán-Calero, M., & Sendra, J.M. (2013). Phenolic profile characterization
605
of pomegranate juice (Punica granatum) by high-performance liquid chromatography
606
with diode array detection coupled to an electrospray ion trap mass analyzer. Journal
607
of Food Composition and Analysis, 30(1), 32-40.
608
Shwartz, E., Glazer, I., Bar-Ya‟akov, I., Matityahu, I., Bar-Ilan,I., Holland, D., & Amir, R.,
28
609
(2009). Changes in chemical constituents during the maturation and ripening of two
610
commercially important pomegranate accessions. Food Chemistry 115(3): 965-973.
611
Singleton, V.L., Orthofer, R., & Lamuela-Raventos, R.M. (1999). Analysis of total phenols
612
and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent.
613
Methods in enzymology, 299, 152-178.
614
Stinzing, F.C. & Carle, R. (2004). Functional properties of anthocyanins and betalains in
615
plants, food, and in human nutrition. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 15(1),
616
19-38.
617
Tehranifar, A., Zarei, M., Nemati, Z., Esfandiyari, B., &Vazifeshenasb, M. R. (2010).
618
Investigation of physico-chemical properties and antioxidant activity of twenty Iranian
619
pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae, 126 (2), 180-185.
620
Tezcan, F., Gültekin-Özgüven, M., Diken,T., Özçelik, B., & Erim, B.F. (2009), Antioxidant
621
activity and total phenolic, organic acid and sugar content in commercial pomegranate
622
juices. Food Chemistry, 115(3), 873-877.
623
Villano, D., Fernández-Pachón, M.S., Moyá, ML., Troncoso, AM., & García-Parrilla, MC.
624
(2007). Radical scavenging ability of polyphenolic compounds towards DPPH free
625
radical. Talanta, 71(1), 230-235.
626
Viuda-Martos, M., Fernández-López, J., & Pérez-Álvarez, J.A. (2010). Pomegranate and its
627
many functional components as related to human health: A Review. Comprehensive
628
Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 9(6), 635-654.
629
Wang, R., Ding,Y., Liu, R., Xiang, L., & Du, L. (2010). Pomegranate: constituents,
630
bioactivities and pharmacokinetics. Fruit Veg Cereal Sci Biotechnol, 4 (Special Issue
29
631
2): 77-87.
632
Zaouay, F., Mena, P., Garcia-Viguera, C., & Mars, M. (2012). Antioxidant activity and
633
physico-chemical properties of Tunisian grown pomegranate (Punica granatum L.)
634
cultivars. Industrial Crops and Products, 40, 81-89.
635
Zarei, M., Azizi, M., & Bashiri-Sadr, Z. (2010). Studies on physico-chemical properties and
636
bioactive compounds of six pomegranate cultivars grown in Iran. Journal of Food
637
Technology, 8(3), 112-117.
638
Zhang, M., Chen, H., Li, J., Pei, Y., & Liang, Y. (2010). Antioxidant properties of tartary
639
buckwheat extracts as affected by different thermal processing methods. LWT-Food
640
Science and Technology, 43(1), 181-185.
30
Figure caption Fig.1 Antioxidant capacities of aril juices of 10 pomegranate cultivars from 4 growing regions of China Data were expressed as gallic acid equivalent concentration (GaEC) and ascorbic acid equivalent concentration (VcEC), EC equivalent concentration (mg/L). Vertical bars represent the standard deviation (n=3); Different case letters above the bars represent the significant difference (p<0.05). TRC, total reducing capacity; DRSC, DPPH radical scavenging capacity; ARSC, ABTS radical scavenging capacity; SASC, Superoxide anion scavenging capacity. XJ, Xinjiang; SD, Shandong; YN, Yunnan; SX, Shaanxi; TSL, SZ, LZ, JPT, SBT belong to sweet pomegranate, SSL is sour pomegranate.
Fig.2 Polyphenols profiles of pomegranate juice from 10 varieties of pomegranate by HPLC analysis. HPLC chromatograms was recorded at 280 nm, compounds were identified as follow: 1) PunicalaginⅠ; 1`) PunicalaginⅡ; 2) Gallic acid; 3) Catechin; 4) Chlorogenic acid; 5) Caffeic acid; 6) Epicatechin; 7) Ferulic acid; 8) Ellagic acid; 9) Keampferol.
31
Table1. Environmental information during the mature and harvest season of the pomegranates in the four growing regions Cultivars XJ-TSL
Difference in temp. (℃) 14.2
Overall avg. temp. (℃) 16.85
Precipitation (mm) 90
Insolation (h) 5410
Altitude (m) 1338
Latitude (S) 39°28'
Longitude (O) 75°59'
XJ-SSL
14.2
16.85
90
5410
1338
39°28'
75°59'
SD-TSL
11.55
17.5
668
4436
74
34°30'
117°32'
SD-SSL
11.55
17.5
668
4436
74
34°30'
117°32'
YN-SZ
7.8
21.25
1012
3248
1302
23° 23'
103° 23'
YN-LZ
7.8
21.25
1012
3248
1302
23° 23'
103° 23'
YN-SSL
7.8
21.25
1012
3248
1302
23° 23'
103° 23'
SX-JPT
7.0
18.4
1864
1989
471.8
34°22'
109°12'
SX-SBT
7.0
18.4
1864
1989
471.8
34°22'
109°12'
SX-SSL
7.0
18.4
1864
1989
471.8
34°22'
109°12'
Environmental information include longitude, latitude, altitude; precipitation (millimeter), insolation (hours), difference of the absolute high and absolute low temperature (℃) and overall average temperature ( ℃ ) of the locations during pomegranate mature time (September and October) in 2012. XJ, Xinjiang, Kashi; SD, Shandong Zaozhuang; YN, Yunnan Mengzi; SX, Shaanxi, Lintong; TSL, SZ, LZ, JPT, SBT and SSL are names of pomegranate cultivars.
Table2. Physicochemical characteristics of aril juices of 10 pomegranate cultivars from 4 growing regions of China Cultivars
Reducing sugar (g/L) 79.32±0.84 g
Titratable acid (g/L) 5.539±0.10 e
Sugar-acid ratio
XJ-TSL
SSC (%) 15.13±0.12 c
15.98±0.29e
Total polyphenols ( GaE mg/mL ) 4.352±0.09 de
Flavonoids (QuE mg/mL) 0.118±0.00 d
Tannins (TaE mg/mL) 1.165±0.09 e
Anthocyanins (GyE mg/mL) 0.160±0.00 a
XJ-SSL
14.97±0.06 cd
62.82±0.82 h
35.60±0.26 b
2.785±0.02 fg
6.147±0.11 b
0.045±0.01 h
1.916±0.02 b
0.122±0.00 b
SD-TSL
16.30±0.17 a
102.7±0.88 b
3.891±0.13 g
26.73±0.93 c
7.429±0.12 a
0.335±0.13 a
2.531±0.08 a
0.034±0.00 f
SD-SSL
15.87±0.32 b
78.50±1.00 g
18.49±0.44 c
5.573±0.13 f
4.481±0.11 d
0.093±0.00 e
1.295±0.01 d
0.063±0.00 e
YN-SZ
14.63±0.32 d
81.52±0.58 f
2.657±0.21 i
37.08±2.92 a
3.234±0.06 g
0.099±0.00e
0.895±0.01 f
0.063±0.00 e
YN-LZ
13.97±0.46 e
93.55±0.89 d
3.328±0.16 h
20.46±1.02 d
3.151±0.05 g
0.084±0.00 f
0.540±0.02 g
0.026±0.00 g
YN-SSL
14.63±0.15 d
110.7±0.58 a
12.47±0.28 d
5.784±0.13 f
4.142±0.08 f
0.171±0.00 c
1.130±0.11 e
0.062±0.00 e
SX-JPT
13.63±0.12 e
86.59±0.83 e
4.486±0.38 f
17.14±1.43 e
4.219±0.10ef
0.259±0.00 b
1.142±0.07 e
0.107±0.00 d
SX-SBT
14.67±0.15 d
100.3±0.25 c
2.809±0.42 i
30.52±4.84 b
4.750±0.08 c
0.170±0.00 c
1.461±0.04 c
0.004±0.01 h
SX-SSL
14.87±0.12 cd
85.99±0.34 e
36.62±0.31 a
1.481±0.01 g
4.735±0.03 c
0.054±0.00 g
1.331±0.04 d
0.116±0.00 c
Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n= 3). Different letters represent significant differences (p< 0.05). XJ, Xinjiang; SD, Shandong; YN, Yunnan; SX, Shaanxi; TSL, SZ, LZ, JPT, SBT belong to sweet pomegranate, SSL belongs to sour pomegranate cultivar. GaE, gallic acid equivalent; QuE, quercetin equivalent; TaE, tannin acid equivalent; CyE, cyanidin equivalent.
Table3. Polyphenol monomers of aril juices of 10 pomegranate cultivars from 4 growing regions of China (ug/mL) Cultivars
Punicalagin
Gallic acid
Catechin
Caffeic acid
Epicatechin
Ferulic acid
Ellagic acid
Kaempferol
4.88±0.08 j
Chlorogenic acid 9.48±0.03 j
XJ-TSL
396.31±0.02 g
2.14±0.03 f
2.32±0.06 c
10.04±0.05 i
0.44±0.03 g
1.02±0.03 a
8.12±0.08 f
XJ-SSL
791.81±0.05 b
14.50±0.02 c
5.63±0.05 i
27.11±0.05 d
1.93±0.01 e
14.04±0.02 f
0.46±0.01 g
0.28±0.01 f
10.66±0.09 e
SD-TSL
1042.93±0.01 a
6.23±0.06 d
40.53±0.04 b
25.56±0.01 e
2.56±0.03 a
9.28±0.03 j
1.72±0.02 a
0.73±0.01 b
1.50±0.02 i
SD-SSL
573.31±0.07 c
3.79±0.04 e
9.70±0.05 g
40.83±0.04 b
2.44±0.05 b
35.65±0.01 a
1.27±0.01 b
0.53±0.02 d
1.67±0.02 h
YN-LZ
264.06±0.02 i
0.70±0.03 h
15.46±0.03 e
23.47±0.02 f
1.37±0.04 g
35.02±0.04 b
0.74±0.01 e
0.25±0.01 g
17.30±0.09 b
YN-SZ
149.85±0.02 j
0.74±0.01 gh
5.98±0.02 h
21.49±0.05 g
1.11±0.02 i
21.26±0.02 e
0.23±0.01 h
0.25±0.00 g
17.79±0.09 a
YN-SSL
479.39±0.01 f
2.09±0.07 f
16.55±0.05 d
44.21±0.03 a
2.19±0.03 d
22.61±0.05 d
0.73±0.02 e
0.65±0.01 c
2.65±0.01 g
SX-JPT
298.99±0.03 h
15.93±0.03 b
9.99±0.07 f
13.96±0.07 i
1.62±0.05 f
25.44±0.06 c
0.81±0.02 d
0.27±0.01 fg
16.89±0.08 d
SX-SBT
504.34±0.01 e
0.80±0.05 g
34.44±0.02 c
21.42±0.03 h
1.22±0.04 h
10.66±0.01 h
1.19±0.04 c
0.53±0.02 d
0.25±0.01 j
SX-SSL
560.83±0.01 d
17.19±0.01 a
41.23±0.01 a
32.26±0.01 c
2.20±0.02 d
12.84±0.03 g
0.59±0.01 f
0.44±0.01 e
17.08±0.08 c
Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n= 3). Different letters represent significant differences (p< 0.05). XJ, Xinjiang; SD, Shandong; YN, Yunnan; SX, Shaanxi; TSL, SZ, LZ, JPT, SBT belong to sweet pomegranate, SSL belongs sour pomegranate.
Table4. Correlation between polyphenol compositions, antioxidant capacities and environmental factors Overall avg. temp. -0.67*
Precipitation
Insolation
Altitude
Latitude
Longitude
Total polyphenols
Difference in temp. 0.51
-0.28
0.39
-0.46
0.61*
0.02
Total flavonoids
-0.12
-0.10
0.20
-0.15
-0.49
0.04
0.46
Total tannin
0.47
-0.65*
-0.25
0.35
-0.49
0.58
0.06
Total anthocyanin
0.48
-0.46
-0.34
0.37
0.29
0.53
-0.66*
Punicalagin
0.50
-0.51*
-0.31
0.41
-0.47
0.52
0.08
Gallic acid
0.01
-0.44
0.24
-0.17
-0.26
0.49
-0.06
Catechin
-0.36
-0.09
0.51
-0.45
-0.59
0.07
0.55
Chlorogenic acid
-0.12
0.24
0.01
-0.02
-0.18
-0.32
0.39
Caffeic acid
0.56
-0.55
-0.43
0.51
-0.36
0.45
0.01
Epicatechin
-0.26
0.46
0.06
-0.11
0.02
-0.52
0.33
Ferulic acid
0.02
-0.30
0.12
-0.03
-0.81**
0.18
0.66**
Ellagic acid
0.47
-0.40
-0.38
0.43
-0.09
0.36
-0.18
Kaempferol
-0.32
0.34
0.23
-0.29
0.38
-0.25
-0.19
TRC
0.50
-0.70*
-0.26
0.36
-0.49
0.65*
-0.04
DRSC
0.38
-0.67*
-0.11
0.22
-0.46
0.64*
0.01
ARSC
0.39
-0.56
-0.20
0.30
-0.55
0.47
0.20
SASC
0.62*
-0.48
-0.54
0.59
-0.05
0.42
-0.28
The results were expressed as Pearson correlation coefficients (r value). ** p< 0.01*. p< 0.05 TRC, total reducing capacity; DRS, DPPH radical scavenging capacity; ARS, ABTS radical scavenging capacity; SAS, Superoxide anion scavenging capacity.
Table5. The effects of cultivar type (T), growing environment (E) and their interactions (T×E) on physicochemical characteristics, polyphenol compositions and antioxidant capacities of aril juices of 10 pomegranate cultivars from 4 growing regions of China. T
E
T×E
SSC (%)
3.19*
79.45***
17.35***
RSC(g/L)
3.52***
43.70***
52.77***
SAR
94.96***
3.94***
1.09***
TAC(g/L)
86.17***
7.79***
6.04***
Total polyphenols (mg/ml)
0.02
46.82***
52.95***
Total flavonoids (mg/ml)
61.11***
14.49***
24.40***
Total tannin (mg/ml)
0.06
45.59***
54.35***
Total anthocyanin (mg/ml)
0.00
90.32***
9.68***
TRC (mgGa/L)
10.31***
45.25***
44.44***
DRSC (mgGa/L)
64.25***
20.00**
15.75*
ARSC (mgGa/L)
0.18
45.58***
54.24***
SASC (mgGa/L)
5.38***
33.96***
60.67***
The results were expressed as the proportion of variance explained by the variable (%). *** p< 0.001; **p<0.01; *p<0.05 SSC, solid soluble content; RSC, reducing sugar content; SAR, sugar acid ratio; TAC, total acid content; TRC, total reducing capacity; DRSC, DPPH radical scavenging capacity; ARSC, ABTS radical scavenging capacity; SASC, Superoxide anion scavenging capacity; Ga, gallic acid equivalents.
Highlights 1. Physicochemical characteristic of pomegranate juices from 10 cultivars was different. 2. The correlation of phenolic compositions and antioxidant capacities was significant. 3. Environmental factors effected phenolic composition and antioxidant capacity. 4. Type and environment interaction influenced phenolic composition and antioxidant capacity.