036~3016/X2/122181~650300/0 Copyright 0 1982 Pergamon
??Symposium
V--Clinical
Charged Particles PION RADIOTHERAPY
AT LAMPF
E. BUSH, M.D., ALFRED R. SMITH, PH.D. AND SANDRA ZINK, PH.D.
STEVEN Cancer
Press Ltd
Research and Treatment
Center,
University of New Mexico. and Department New Mexico, School of Medicine
of Radiology.
University
of
Clinical investigatims of pi meson radiotherapy were conducted by the Cancer Research and Treatment Center of the University of New Mexico and the Los Alamos National Laboratory from 1974 until 1982. Two hundred and thirty patients have been treated for a variety of locally advanced primary and metastatic neoplasms. One hundred and ninety-six patients have been followed for a minimum of 18 months. Crude survival data range from 11% for unresectable pancreatic carcinoma to 82 % for Stages C and Dl adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Acute tolerance of normal tissues is approximately 4500 pion rad in 36 fractions over 7 weeks. Severe chronic reactions have appeared with increasing frequency after doses in excess of 4000 pion rad. Pions, Particle
radiotherapy.
INTRODUC’TION The potential mesons
(pions)
were
were
treated
Facility
(LAMPF). 1974 and
neoplasms Clinical dose
suggested
at
between
from
the
a variety
and
treatment
dosimetric
methods,
immobilization, ning.
One
large
volumes
hundred
and deep-seated
curative rad,
intent
and
additional intent
33
with
a combination
pion irradiation of treatment reported
of conedown of a portion
30 patients
tissue
of patient
positioning
and
been
IX
treated
volumes.
Additional
prior
to
19X1
I25
pion An
and
pion
group
and results
have
regarding
been
the
basis
tumor
of this
METHODS LAMPF Pions
casts.
surgery
combined
conventional
MeV of
water-cooled and bending
is a linear proton
accelerator
beam
appropriate graphite magnets
AND MATERIALS at
momenta target
designed
a current by
as described
are
of
to produce
collected
a series
an
1 milliampere. from
of quadrupole
by Paciotti
rr ~1.~ The
These investigations were supported by U.S.P.H.S. Grant NO. 5 PO1 CA 16127 from the National Cancer Institute and by the U.S. Department of Energy.
was 80’S
Supplemental
Table
1 shows
patients
followed
at least
had
known
two
who
tional
from
the
less than
patients
with
have
been
dose
for
dose
in whom
in or
com-
pion
irra-
of
those
I96
Thirty-eight
died
cura-
therapy
planned
distribution
2700
for at least
radiotherapy
analysis,
5 who
of the
of cvaluable
prescribed
follow
IX months.
additional
metastases.
received
not
and
rad.
minimum
of the
in selected did
pion
volumes
conventional
regression
of tumor
radiation
The
1974 Phase
196 patients.
treated
conedown
interval.
diation.
patients
including
during
pion
3
therapy.
rad
I &ho and
without
addi-
potential
curt
therapy.
The a
of
same
was employed
under
followed
with
tumor
treated
regression
has been
known
between
2700
33 patients
volumes
or without
pions
of
than
complctc
observed.
the
of
techniques
a spectrum
additional
wet-c excluded
report.
X00
most
plcte
of an additional
form
treated
were
An
for
pion
with
A population greater
irradiation
followed
rate
of 2 liters.
treatment
with
to elucidate
dose at which was first
2700
curative
treated
reactions. received
minimum disease
months. with
and follow-up
which
intent
Preliminary
data
of
but
intended
tive
irradiation
patient
six patients
with
than
of
All
tissue
and
a fixed,
a dose
in a volume
patients
and
IX months.
treated
and thirty were
1982.
with
described.‘.‘.’
disease
I- I I trials
126
minute
mctastatic
normal
plan-
with
hundred
produces
beam
of the channel
in
and
treatment
patients
have
been
of this
respon:;e
treated
to standardization
of conventional
previously.‘,”
and normal
and
increase
per
been previously
Two
treated
or metastatic
sites and histologics.
in doses greater
have
were
advanced
a minimum
patients
Physics
treatment
divergent
5 rad
have
twenty-live
pions for
approximately Characteristics
neoplasms
with
followed
in
pion radiother-
localiration and
Perkins
used in patient
minimally
Meson
to a gradual
techniques
tumor
vertical,
Alamos
of primary led
pi
and
of 230 patients
have
channel
negative
to receive
Los
A total
with
by Fowler
19X2 fcr locally
observations
pion
‘3f radiotherapy
1974, the first patients
1961.’ In apy
advantages
patient
includes and
neck
and
3
population
3X patients (35 with
with
with
analyzed advanced
T3 and
locally
for
neoplasms
T4 squamous
advanced
minor
cell
of the head carcinomas
salivary
gland
Reprint requests to Steven E. Bush. M.D.. St. .loscph ltohpltal. 400 Walter Avenue, N.E.. Albuquerque. NM X7 102. Accepted for publication 2X .luly 19X7.
2182
Radiation Oncology
Table
0 Biology
0 Physics
December
patients
RESIILTS with
tumors).
Forty-two
including
27 with
grade
astrocytoma.
radiotherapy conedown
125
volumes
additional
patients
patients
miscellaneous nary bladder.
with
had locally (Stage
carcinoma
skin, stomach,
gliomas
other
DI)
treated
tumors
rectum,
including
cervix,
Sixteen
with
additional
clinical
for logistic and
on the
(cx-
other
sites
curves for the two
of 28 patients multiforme)
of IO months and I4 patients
adenocarciand
I8
with
had
a median
indicates
Twenty-three alone
(glioblastoma
i.e., those with gliomas
grade
for
survival
III
and
combination
of the
doses of
3600
of that
received
subgroup
treated
whole brain rads
and
A third
curve
of I7 patients
pion
with
with
a planned
radiotherapy
to
irradiation
01
conedown
volumes in doses of 1250 to I800 pion rad. This
in
treatment
plan was employed
in this
follow-up
is abbreviated
of beam
treated
basis of any
only after August.
compared
with pions alone; the median
to that survival
1979. so
for patients has not yet
been reached. 3 shows similar
curves for patients
treated
-Dead n=36
-Alive (X)
l-l =25 n=23
n=22 I
l(
a Head +
survival
with grade II I astrocytoma
IV astrocytoma to 4600
a median
of 22 months.
of conventional
lung and uricom-
survival
and
with grade IV astrocywith
Survival in 125 patiants with 126 tumors treated to dose >27DDTr
Brain
those
2 shows the survival
of
Figure
“r
and miscellaneous
of patients;
of
of the pelvis
Figures 2 and 3 show crude survival
parameters. 5
thorax
tumors
toma
to scheduling
not selected
for advanced
tumors of the head and neck. Figure
and pion irradiation
reasons related
were
treated
pancreatic
percent
those with advanced
doses less than 2700 pion rad. Patients were treated fashion
and unresectablc Fifty-two
conventional
carcinoma
patients
radiotherapy
carcinomas
respectively.
largest subgroups
pions
esophagus,
I I’P for
and Stage C
and I5 with
advanced
C and
head and neck tumors.
eluding prostate), survived.
pion irradiation
of the pancreas.
were
bined conventional
operation
and DI prostatic
2
for at least IX months.
rates are 2X%. 34’7r. 82% and
advanced
carcinomas,
in doses of 1200 to 1800 pion rad.
of the prostate
unresectable
brain
gliomas,
patients
received
with pions alone in doses grcntcr
than 2700 pion rad and followed
31 5
malignant
rates for 125 patients
crude survival
I26 tumors treated
These survival
33
multiforme
Seventeen
to the whole
Twenty-two noma
had
patients
glioblastoma
I indicates
Figure
196
Patients receiving >2700 pion rad Patients receiving ~2700 pion rad with additional conventional XRT Non-curative patients Known distant metastases Died during therapy Dose ~2700 pion rad without additional therapy
I7
X. Number
I. Patients treated with pions I974- I98 I Total
III
19X?. Volume
Prostate
Pancreas
Other
fl0Ck
Fig. I. Survival of I25 patients with 126 tumors treated to doses of 2700 pion rad and followed for a minimum of I8 months.
for
Pion radiotherapy at LAMPF 0 S. E.
I_
l(4)
c
‘-;
-
-
2183
BUSH ef al.
-II-
--y L_
b-l L
‘7
--,
-L
‘,”Booat I
;
??conv4ntional
1
7
I-
XRl
1
-l
Or
1
Ll UL, L
- -1
----I
---
l
‘c&H
L
0
I
5
15
10
Thm
Fig. 2. Crude survival-Glioma
c4ud8
20
25
30
35
bnonw
patients
strvw-
by histology and treatment
techniques.
t488d + M8ck Patbntr
00
II0
1’0
I10 _ f
c
E
a
_ A’ oropharynr
00
u
All
patients
30
20
10
0
patmntf
(n = 15)
!I0
10
20
30
40
50
Thm hlcum8)
Fig. 3. Crude survival-Head
and neck patients.
80
(n = 38)
21x4
Radiation
Oncology
0 Biology
0 Physics
December
advanced neoplasms of the head and neck. This population of 38 patients includes 35 with squamous cell carcinomas Stage T3 and T4 with or without regional nodal disease and 3 patients with minor salivary gland tumors. Fifteen of these patients had primary tumors in the oropharynx and are analyzed separately. The median survival for the entire population is 12 months with 90% of deaths occurring within 2 years. Eight of I5 patients with oropharyngeal primaries survive at times up to 5 years with no deaths after I8 months. Figure 4 shows local control statistics for the same population of I25 patients treated with pion irradiation in doses in excess of 2700 pion rad previously analyzed with respect to survival. Local tumor status was assessed clinically by means of physical examination, routine CT scanning and other radiological procedures and clinical laboratory studies. Local control was obtained in only 8% of glioma patients when determined by the following criteria: neurological stability, absence of mass effect and contrast enhancement on CT scan, and absence of steroid dependence. The local control statistics for neoplasms of the head and neck, prostate, and pancreas were 50% 73%‘. and 0%. respectively. Local control was determined only upon complete disappearance of mass effect on CT scanning in the cases of pancreatic carcinoma. Twenty-six percent of patients treated for miscellaneous tumors of the skin, lung, esophagus, stomach, cervix, rectum, and bladder had no evidence of local disease at follow-up of 18 to 55 months. Determination of acute and chronic normal tissue 50
19X2. Volume
8. Number
I7
reactions for various tissues has been a major goal of the Phase I-II clinical trials. Acute normal tissue reactions have been qualitatively identical to those associated with conventional radiotherapy and have not necessitated unanticipated interruption of therapy except in four patients (2 with head and neck neoplasms and two with massive pelvic primaries). Acute reactions to pion radiotherapy have been systematically recorded according to a scale of O-4 as follows: O-nil; l-skin erythema, mucosal injection, mild dysuria or diarrhea 54 stools per day, etc.; 2--dry desquamation, patchy mucositis, moderate dysuria, diarrhea with mucus (~5 stools per day), etc.; 3-moist desquamation, confluent mucositis, severe dysuria with bladder spasms, diarrhea with blood, etc.; and 4-acute necrosis. Average sums of acute reactions were obtained by summing severities of all reactions for individual anatomic sites as follows: head and neckmucosa, skin, salivary glands; pelvis-skin, rectum, bladder; thorax-skin, dysphagia; abdomen-nausea, diarrhea; brain-skin. An analysis of acute reactions for the first 91 patients treated with pions alone after biopsy is shown in Table 2, demonstrating a trend to more severe reactions at all sites except pelvis and brain in the higher dose range, although these data ignore such potentially contributory factors as daily fraction size, treatment volume, and hyperfractionation. The average sum of acute reactions for I I patients (10 with carcinomas of the head and neck and one with carcinoma of the stomach) receiving greater than 5000 rad was 6.2. Of greater importance in evaluation of the therapeutic
Local control in 125 patients with 126 tumors treated to dose >2700 fr
iG.l
-local failure
n=30
40
In E Q .L 2 a.
-local control (%I
3c
5 $
n =23
n=22
+ 2
20
18
n=
7//
10
73
/
0 261
0
Fig. 4. Local tumor control minimum of 18 months.
Brain
in 125 patients
Head +
& Prostate
with 126 tumors
-
treated
Pancreas
Other
to doses 2700 pion rad and followed for a
Pion radiotherapy
Table
2.
Acute injury related to pion irradiation >2700 pion rad by site and dose range
Dose range
Site
at LAMPF
in doses
adenocarcinoma
Average sum of acute reactions
13 8 3 6 6
5.1 4.6 2.3 1.8 I.2
area receiving tumor
Head and neck
24
5.8
Pelvis Thorax Abdomen Brain
I2 I 6 I2
4.9 3.0 2.2 I.2
Note: See text for explamtion
chronic
and
Chronic
irreversible
reactions
been recorded
treatment
following
according
of EORTC/RTOG,
with bowel
small
in which
able to radiotherapy.
Grade
while reactions
There
effects
year-old
female had chronic
following
related
morbidity.
fibrosis
have
4300
less than
Eight
of IO patients
pion
rad
had
exceeded
one
liter
provide all
a population
patients
were
techniques.
alone.
0
=
severe
Pion radiotherapy ment of advanced
life-
best suited to this analywith
pions
observations
to increasing treatment
severity
volume
has been employed neoplasms
alone
of other of
late
and especially
??
! I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I
0
0 looo----------------------
?? ??
---7
IQ I I I
0
0
??
0
?? 3500
4ooo
DOSE
Chronic injury with pion irradiation
I
I
I I I I I
I 4500
4700
(nr)
of rectal carcinomas
-Dose-volume
in
in 230 patients
SCORE
ii s
Fig. 5
or
for prostatic
DISCUSSION
2m-
2ooL
doses
total dose.
carci-
0
to had
to severe
severe
o-1
??
for
rad
whose treatment
treated
treated
However.
the trend increasing
pion
receiving
0=2
500-
late effects recorded
moderate had
late effects. The patients
effects with
lNm?Y
using
only two of nine patients
CHRONtC RECTAL WLJFW WtTH PION IRRADIATION OF PROSTATE CANCER CHRONIC
to
in a group of
4300
and three of those six patients
using similar
4000 pion rad for a large
R’roG/EORrC
Fig-
related
carcinomas
also
sites confirm
developed
prostatic
reactions
sis because
edema and aspira-
A second patient following
treated
volumes carcinoma
A 70
doses
reactions. than
life-threatening
irradiation
laryngeal
rectal injury
to the EORTC/RTOG
less than one liter;
threatening
ranges
5000 pion rad for a T4 squamous
noma of the larynx. pulmonary
to pion
following
intestine.
were no severe late effects
receiving
greater
of grade 3 and above are consid-
chronic
for advanced
prostate developed
expired
of devitalized
and volume
moderate
of
are of moderate
have developed
involvement
dose of pion irradiation
system.
to 5, i.e. death ascrib-
2 reactions
resection
recurrent
Two patients
advanced
and
of chronic
patients
of reaction
nodal
obstruction
are scored according
irradiation
severity
reaction
ered severe. Five patients
tion
related
locally
ure 5 shows an analysis 20 men treated
is the incidence
the pion
rad for
regional
surgical
locally
histologically.
pions alone in doses of 3300 to 4600 pion rad. Late effects
to the late effects scoring system
from 0, i.e. no detectable severity
modality
pion
late
attempted
of scoring system.
of a new treatment
4500
woman
brain necrosis in an
3700 pion rad, although
carcinomas
volumes efhcacy
developed
was also demonstrated
receiving
>4000
of the lung and a 58 year-old
with grade III astrocytoma
Number of patients
Head and neck Pelvis Thorax Abdomen Brain
t4000
2185
0 S. E. BUSH ef al.
considerations.
the manageof whom
196
2186
Radiation Oncology 0 Biology 0 Physics
have been followed
for at least 18 months.
December
1982. Volume
One hundred
volumes
less than
with doses of
acute
and twenty-five
patients
pion irradiation
in excess of 2700 pion rad, a potentially
curative tional
have been treated
dose. Follow-up information
normal
tissue reactions
comprise
of these patients
regarding
disease site, histological treatment
Relatively
small
intervals,
population
numbers
studies
efficacy
of pion
conventional These
may eradicate
be obtained
with
able chronic
reactions
ters including determined,
respect
to
of con-
radiotherapy.
short
observations
on the
and its comparability
with
previous advanced
reports
acute morbidity
dose and volume
considerations
of 4250 pion rad in 33 to 35 fractions
trend toward
treated
rad, particularly diation may
when associated
or subsequent not
following
severe injury
with doses greater
manifest
surgical themselves
in
with large volume until
These
or
2
irraeffects
more
years
therapy.
Clinical
trials
at LAMPF
1982. although
related
the SIN
in Villigen.
facility
that continued
were
clinical
follow-up
of patients
radiotherapy.
to techniques
and accept-
zation,
dosimetry
other forms of particle been collected.
a large
of patient and
is proceeding
treated clinical
at LAMPF of dose
trials of pion
body of information
positioning
treatment
at
It is anticipated
in determination
in future
In addition.
related
in April,
discontinued
research
Switzerland.
in a vari-
over seven weeks to
of
than about 4300 pion
intervention.
considerations
have been
terms
has appeared
patients
and volume
and suggest that doses of pions in the range
in
ever a definite
pion
parame-
acceptable
Late effect dat;i follow-up, how-
may
in most cases. Treatment
are
necessary guidance
up to 4’/2 years. This benefit
tolerable
liter
will provide that
neoplasms
one
and late normal tissue to tolerance. remain incomplete given relatively brief
follow-up
design of these early
techniques.
substantiate
ety of sites for intervals
pion
definitive
irradiation
treatment
data
irradiation
preclude
and
These patients with
of patients,
addi-
control
type and combinations
supplementing
and the non-randomized
clinical
provides
tumor
to pion irradiation.
a heterogeneous
ventional
survival,
I7
8. Number
planning
and conventional
and immobilirelevant
radiotherapy
It may be hoped that this information
to has will
direct future research in particle radiotherapy in general, as well as ongoing clinical trials of pion radiotherapy.
REFERENCES 1. Fowler,
P.H., Perkins, D.H.: The possibility of therapeutic applications of beams of negative x mesons. Nature 189: 524-528, 1961. 2. Hogstrom, K.R.. Smith, A.R.. Kelsey, C.A., Simon, S.L., Somers, J.W., Lane, R.G., Rosen, 1.1.. Von Essen. C.F.. Kligerman. M.M., Berardo, PA., Zink, S.M.: Static pion beam treatment planning of deep seated tumors using computerized tomographic scans at LAMPF. In?. J. Radiar. Oncot. Biol. Phys. 5: 875-886, 1979. 3. Kligerman. M.M.. Bush, S.E.. Kondo, M.. Wilson, SE., Smith, A.: Results of Phase l-11 trials of pion radiotherapy. Proceeding of the Second Annual Rome International SJlrnposium on Biological Bases and Clinical Implications of Tumor Radioresistance ( In press). 4. Kligerman, M.M., Hogstrom, K.R.. Lane, R.G., Somers, J.: Prior immobilization and positioning for more efficient
radiotherapy. Inr. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phj,s. 2: I 141I 144. 1977a. S. Kligerman. M., Tsujii. H.. Bagshaw. M.. Wilson, S.. Black, W., Mettler. F., Hogstrom. K.: Current observation of pion radiation therapy at LAMPF. In Treatment of Radioresistant Cancers. Abe. M., Sakamoto. K. (Eds.). Amsterdam. Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press. 1979. pp. 145 157. 6. Paciotti. M.. Bradbury. J.. Hutson. R.. Knapp, E., Rivera, 0.: Tuning the beam shaping section at the LAMPF biomedical channel. IEEE Trans. Nut. Sri. NS-24: 1058, 1977. 7. Tsujii, H.. Bagshaw, M.. Smith, A., Von Essen, C., Mettler. F., Kligerman. M.: Localization of structures for pion radiotherapy by computerized tomography and orthodiagraphic projection. Int. J. Radial. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 6: 319-325. 1980.