Polarographic study of mixed ligand complexes: Cadmium-imidazole-malonate system

Polarographic study of mixed ligand complexes: Cadmium-imidazole-malonate system

J. inorg, nucl. Chem. VoL 43. No. I1. pp, 2885-2888, 1981 Printed in Great Britain 0022-1902/81/112885-04502.0010 Pergamon Press Ltd. POLAROGRAPHIC ...

207KB Sizes 0 Downloads 59 Views

J. inorg, nucl. Chem. VoL 43. No. I1. pp, 2885-2888, 1981 Printed in Great Britain

0022-1902/81/112885-04502.0010 Pergamon Press Ltd.

POLAROGRAPHIC STUDY OF MIXED LIGAND COMPLEXES: CADMIUM-IMIDAZOLE-MALONATE SYSTEM MADHU SHIVHARE, KRISHNA, NISHA JAIN and MUKHTAR SINGH* Chemical Laboratories, Agra College, Agra 282002, India

(Received 4 December 1980; receivedfor publication 18 May 1981) Abstract--The mixed ligand complexes of imidazole (Im) and malonate (Mal) with Cd(lI) have been studied

polarographically at constant ionic strength, # =2.0 (NaNO3) and pH 8 at 25±0.1°C. The reduction of the complexes at d.m.e, is reversible and diffusion-controlled. Three mixed complexes, [Cd(lm)(Mal)], [Cd(Im)(Mal)2]2and [Cd(Im)2(Mal)J are formed. Their overall stability constants at 25°C are: log,8, =4.0, log /312= 4.4 and log/~21 = 5.9, respectively. INTRODUCTION

Li et al) have studied polarographically the composition and stability constants of simple complexes of Cd(II) with imidazole, a monodentate ligand, L2 in aqueous and alcoholic media. The composition and the stability constants were determined by Lingane's 3 method. Although the plot of E~/2 vs log [Im] was a curve, it was interpreted 4 as a composite of three straight lines. The analysis of these straight lines revealed the formation of three complexes, [Cd(Im)2]z+, [Cd(Im)3] 2+ and [Cd(Im)4] 2+ with stability constants, 1og/32 = 5.0, log/3~ =6.5 and log/34 = 7.5, respectively. However, the method employed by Li et al. for studying the composition and the stability constants of the consecutive complexes of Cd(II) with imidazole was not accurate: It was, therefore, thought worthwhile to undertake the polarographic study of the simple and mixed complexes of Cd(II) with imidazole and malonate ions using DeFord and Hume's method. EXPERIMENTAL

All reagents were analytical grade and their solutions were prepared in conductivity water. The ionic strength was maintained constant at # = 2.0 using NaNO3 as supporting electrolyte. Imidazole and potassium malonate were used as ligands. The concentration of Cd(ll) was maintained at 1 x 10-3 M. Polarograms were obtained by means of a manual polarograph (Toshniwal CL 02) in conjunction with Toshniwal polyflex galvanometer (PL 50). All the measurements were made at 25-+ 0.1°C and pH 8. A saturated calomel electrode (S.C.E.) was used as reference electrode. The d.m.e, had the following characteristics (in 0.I M NaNO3, open circuit): m = 1.5mg/sec, t = 2.75 sec, m2:3t~t6= 1.55 mg2/3 sec-~/2, hcorr= 52 cm. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The reduction of Cd(II) in both imidazole and malonate media was found to be reversible and diffusioncontrolled. The same was true for the mixed system. The slopes of linear plots of log ilia- i VS Ea.¢. were of the order of 33 mV and the plots of id vs h~c/o2rrwere linear and passed through the origin. The stability constants of simple complexes of Cd(II) with imidazole and malonate were determined separately prior to the study of mixed ligand system. Identical conditions were maintained in both the simple and mixed systems.

Cd(II)-imidazole system A plot of E~/2 vs log [Im] was a smooth curve, suggesting the formation of successive complexes. DeFord and Hume's method was applied to determine the stability constants of successive complexes. The polarographic characteristics and Fj[X] functions of Cd(II)-imidazole system are listed in Table 1. Four complexes, [Cd(Im)] 2+, [Cd(Im)2]2÷, [Cd(Im)3] 2+ and [Cd(Im)4] 2+ with stability constants, log/3|o = 2.7, log/32o = 4.0, log/330 -- 5.3 and log B4o = 7.0, respectively, are formed.

Cd(II)-malonate system A plot of E~/2 vs log [Mal2 ] was a smooth curve thereby suggesting the formation of successive complexes. DeFord and Hume's method was applied to determine the stability constants of successive complexes. The polarographic characteristics and Fj[X] functions of Cd(II)-malonate system are presented in Table 2. Three complexes, [Cd(Mal)], [Cd(Mal)2] ~- and [Cd(Mal)3]4- with stability constants log/3o~=l.0, log/3o2 = 2.6 and log/3o3 = 3.6, respectively, are formed. The values are nearly the same as reported by Gaur 7 for this system.

Cd(II)-imidazole-malonate-mixed system Imidazole concentration was varied from 0.02 to 0.16 M and that of malonate was kept constant at 0.10 M. The Et/2 values were greater compared to those obtained in the absence of malonate thereby showing the formation of mixed complexes. The system was repeated at another concentration of malonate (0.20 M). The method of Schaap and McMasters 8 was used to determine the values of the stability constants of mixed complexes. The polarographic characteristics and F~[XY] functions of mixed complexes of Cd(II) with imidazole and malonate at fixed [MaF ] (0.10M and 0.20 M) are presented in Tables 3 and 4. The stability constants of the mixed complexes were calculated from the constants s A, B, C and D. Three mixed complexes as noted below are formed: [Cd(Im)(Mal)]; log/3,, = 4.0 [Cd(Im)(Mal)2]2-; log/3,2 = 4.4 [Cd(Im)2(Mal)]; log/32~ = 5.9.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

The mixing constant KM (equilibrium constant) for the 2885

2886

M. SHIVHARE et aL Table 1. Cd(II~im~azole system: [Cd 2+] = 1 x 10-3 M; ~ = 2.0 (NaNO3); pH 8; temp. 25°C t

,

M

i

V , (S. 3. ~.)

div.

' ,

x10--

t

t

t

~ ×10->

' v10 ,

' ×10-6

I

0.0

O. 605

1 "3

0.02

0.636

110

11.¢9

5.24

O. 04

0.660

110

74.61

I~.~0

35.60

5.87

0.06

0.675

110

740.20

3a.~6

58.10

£.O1

O. 08

0.687

108

622.90

77.73

90. ql

lq.ll

10.15

0.10

0.697

106

1394.00

158.30

15~.30

I~.5~

I0.~5

O. 20

0.730

104

18460.00

9oq.45

459.7~

~2.¢3

In. eq

0.30

0.752

104

87680.00

2o~2.63

079.54

~9.08

1~.02

0.40

0.764

10¢

260600.00

651¢.97

1627.49

40.~5

9.60

0.50

0.776

104

664700.00

13293.98

2657.79

52.95

Iq.50

O. 60

0.784

97

1529410.00

22156.80

5691.q6

61.36

le.O0

Table 2. Cd(II)--malonate system: [Cd2+] = 1 x 10-3 M;/~ = 2.0 (NaNO3); pH 8; temp. 25°C v

r

w

v

v

Fo[X ] , z1[x2 M

V '(S.C.~.)

' ,

I

!

dlv.

'

, x l O -I

0.00

0.605

110

0.05

0.619

100

3.27

4.48

0.10

0.639

99

15.71

14.71

0.15

0.647

98

29.61

19.07

O. 2O

O.656

97

60.26

0.30

0.668

96

155.20

0.40

0.678

95

342.00

0.50

0.685

94

0.60

0.692

93

!

,

F2[x]

,

F3[x)

!

x!O -I

!

xlO - 2

87.15

31.43

29.63

118.15

39.07

51.40

151.33

37.11

85.25

198.12

59.53

595.70

118.94

225.88

57.17

1038.00

172.93

278.05

39.67

Table 3. Cd(II)-imidazole-malonate system: [Cd 2+] = 1 x 10-3 M, [Mal2-] = 0.1 M (fixed);/t = 2.0 (NaNO3); pH 8; temp. = 25°C !

'

V (S.C.~.)

!

'

ld

'

' ,

dlv.

'

!

I

, x10 -3

, x 1 0 -5

Fo[XY] '1o ' x10 -2 T

|

0.00

0.605

110

0.02

0.569

99

63.89

23.94

0.04

0.677

98

306.60

72.65

0.06

0.687

96

682.20

111.03

151.71

8.61

0.08

0.695

96

1273.O0

157.12

171.40

8.92

0.10

0.701

95

2053°00

203.70

187.70

8.7O

0.12

0.707

91

3165.00

262.25

201,87

8.49

0.14

0.711

91

4671.00

332.50

223.21

8.7~

0.16

0.716

89

6696.00

417.50

248.43

9.24

A . 16 , B = 20xi02

C

IO0xi03

D

8.5xi05

131.62

Polarographic study of mixed ligand complexes

2887

Table 4. Cd(II)-imidazole--malonate system: [Cd2+] = 1 x 10-3 M; [Mal2-] = 0.2 M (fixed);/~ temp. = 25°C

%]

, -~I12

M

,(S.C.m..)

, q

2.0 (NaNO3); pH 8;

,1'oo [xY] ,~IO [x~] ,~2o [xq

,~o

'

, x10 -5

V div,

=

,

x10 -2

, xlO -4

[x~]

0.00

0.605

110

0.02

0.665

97

121.60

0.04

0.685

95

590.80

132.50

22.87

0.06

0.695

95

1286.00

204.33

27.21

17.00

0.08

0,702

94

2424.00

295,50

31.81

18.51

0.10

0.709

93

3910.00

385.00

34.40

17.40

0.12

0.714

8B

6101.00

503.41

38.53

17.94

0.14

0.719

87

9114.00

646.71

43.27

17.66

0.16

0.723

87

12450.00

774.37

45.88

18. O0

A

- 60 , B = 41x102 , C = 17x104 , D = 17.5x105

Table 5. Equilibria involved in three mixed complexes and quilibrium constant (K) values Nquilibria

io ~_ K at 25°C

I.

ca 2÷ + I~ ÷ ~ i 2- ".~

2.

~2~

3.

~ . +. 2Im. +. Mal. 2-.

+ Im + ~ I

4.

[Cd(Ira) (:',~l~] +

5.

[o~Ii~]

~- .

Im

~--

+

-" [o~(I~Jm~lJ]

~.o

------" [ c d ( I ~ ( ~ _ ~ l ) ~ ]

~

---

.-

"

i...

2-

4.~

[~d(Im) 2(Mal ~] 2-

5.9

[~d(Ira) 2(Mal)-J

I. 9

- [~(I~(,;~l]

+ ,~-

1.5

9--

+ 2Mal

-

~

~-

reactions: l/2[Cd(Imh] 2+ + U2[Cd(Malh] 2' [Cd(Im)(Mal)] l/2[Cd(Imh] 2÷ + l/2[Cd(Malhl 2. "[Cd(Imh(Mal)]

d(Ira)(Mal)

[~

2-

~-

solution as compared to parent binary complexes. This is given by the following relations 9'1° (1) (2)

indicates the relative stability of mixed complexes in

KM = fll,/X/(fl2oBo2)

(3)

Ku =/32,/X/(B~/3o2).

(4)

These yield +1.4 for reaction (1) and +0.9 for reaction

2888

M. SHIVHARE et al.

(2). The positive values show that the mixed complexes, [Cd(Im)(Mal)] and [Cd(Im)e(Mal)] are somewhat more stabJe than the simple complexes: [Cd(Im)2] 2+, [Cd(Imh] 2+ and [Cd(Mal)2] 2-. Three mixed complexes exist in solution in the equilibria shown in Table 5. The equilibrium constants (log values) are given for each equilibrium. From the equilibrium constant values the tendency of a ligand to add to a complex and to substitute another ligand may be compared. It is seen that Im adds to [Cd(Im)(Mal)] readily. The ligand Im can replace Mal 2in complex [Cd(Mal)3] 4-. Equilibria 10, 11 and 12 favour mixed complexation over the simple ones. The stabilities of three mixed complexes follow the order: [Cd(Im)~(Mal)] > [Cd(Im)(Mal)2] 2- > [Cd(Im)(Mal)]. Acknowledgement--We thank Dr. S. N. Srivastava, Principal, Agra College, Agra for provision of facilities.

REFERENCES 1. N. C. Li, J. M. White and E. Doody, J. Am. Chem. 76, 6219 (1954). 2. D. R. Crow, J. Polarog. Soc. 11, 67 (1967). 3. J. J. Lingane, Chem. Rev. 29, 1 (1941). 4. D. R. Crow, Polarography of Metal Comple~es, p. 63. Academic Press, New York (1969). 5. D. R. Crow, Polarography of Metal Complexes, p. 62. Academic Press, New York (1969). 6. D. D. DeFord and D. N. Hume, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 73, 5321 (1951). 7. R. S. Sharma and J. N. Gaur, Ind. J. Chem. 16A, 509 (1978). 8. W. B. Schaap and D. L. McMasters, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 83, 4699 (1961). 9. R. Sundaresan and A. K. Sundaram, Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. 79A, 161 (1974). 10. S. L. Jain, J. Kishan and R. C. Kapoor, Ind. J. Chem. 18A, 133 (1979).