Polarography and zone electrophoresis of uranyl-L-methionine complexes

Polarography and zone electrophoresis of uranyl-L-methionine complexes

JOURXAL OF ELECTRO-AKXLYTICIL POLAROGRXPHY AKiD URANYL-L-RIETHIONINE TSA-TEH LA1 Depm-imeni of CJzemicaZ XSD September (Received CHEMISTKY ...

351KB Sizes 1 Downloads 67 Views

JOURXAL

OF

ELECTRO-AKXLYTICIL

POLAROGRXPHY AKiD URANYL-L-RIETHIONINE

TSA-TEH

LA1

Depm-imeni

of CJzemicaZ

XSD

September

(Received

CHEMISTKY

ZOI\;E ELECTROPHORESIS COMPLEXES

HEXG-SHOE Epzgzneevixg.

19th.

225

OF

CHEXG Cherzg

K?r~r 5 Urriuevsity,

Tainan.

Taiwan

(China)

1965)

IXTRODUCTION

studied

The formation of complexes between methionine and metal ions has been by various methods. PELLETIER~ has reported the formation of I : I-, I : 2- and

I :3-complexes between nickel and methionme, and determined then formation constants by Bjerrum’s method_ PERRIX~.~ measured the formation constants of I : Iferric- and -ferrous-methioninate complexes by potentiometric titration_ The I I I and I : a-cupric-methioninate complexes have been studied by several investigatorsJ=s. LI AND MXXXING~ deduced the binding site in the complexes of zinc and lead with methionine and measured their formation constants_ In the present x-ark, the complex of r-methionine with uranyl ion has been studied by polarography and zone electrophoresis_

EXPERIMENTAL.

The apparatus and procedures used in this work have been reported elsehaving a flow rate of where7. Polarograms were taken at 30 k 0.1~ using a capillary 2.140 mg/sec and a drop time of 4-39 set at 69.1 cm of mercury height (1~) in 0.5 M sodium perchlorate solution at -0-250 V us. S_C_E. Triton X-100 (o_ooz~/~) was used as a maximum suppressor and 0.2 M sodium perchlorate as supporting electrolyte. The preparation and analysis of the uranyl perchlorate solution used was described in an earlier papers_ A 2.00-M L-methionine solution was freshly prepared before use by dissolving 29.85 g of special grade (Nutritional Biochemicals Corporation) in deionized water and diluting to IOO ml. RESULTS

Nature

_4ND

DISCUSSION

of yeduction

The reversibility of the electrode reaction was deduced immediately from the value of E, -E, and a plot of log i/( id-i) was made for further confirmation. The (EP -E&value for all polarograms falls in the range 0.054-0_060 V and the log plot has an average reciprocal slope of o.ogS, in the pH range 0.8-4-7 and ligand-concentration range o_o&o.z M_ All these values are in good agreement with the theoretical J_ EZeclroanaZ

Chem..

12

(1966)

zz5-zzg

226

IAT

value

for a one-electron

temperature (which

reversible

coefficient

is less than

of the

+ I mV/O)

reduction.

half-wave

provides

The

value

potential

further

of

-

in the

evidence

0.23

T_ T., C,YESG

iX

mV,/degrce

temperature

for the

range

of the reversible

S.

6-45,”

character

of

the reaction_ solution ate and

A constant value for id,/h+=o_34S fo.ooq was obtained for the polarographic of 1.0 rnlM uranyl perchlorate, 0-06 Jf r-methionine, o-2 LW sodium perchloro_ooz~/, Triton X-100 at pH 4.~4 at a mercury height of 47 z-So.5 cm. The

temperature

coefficient

data indicate Effect

of PW

The

of the diffusion

that the electrode asvd .&and

effect

of

reaction

cm-rent

was found

is entirely

to be r.r5:4/degree

These

diffusion-controlled_

concemtratiolz

pH

on

the

polarographic

behaxiour

of

uran>-l-L-methionine

complex was studied over the pH range 0.5-4-7 by polarographing solutions of 1.0 O.OOZ~/~ Triton X-100 and rdkf uranyl perchlorate in 0.2 M sodium perchlorate, various concentration of r;methionine. The upper limit of pH was restricted to 4.7 by the precipitation of uranium- The greater the concentration is the pH value that can be reached before precipitation

0_06o

Fig.

I. Variation of E, vrith At_ I-0 mfll UO2(C104)2,

Fig_ 0.06

z_ Variation M Cm and

of 0.0020,<

of L-methionine.

pH and ligand concn.. C,: (0). o-zoo; ( 0). o-z _W NaC104 and O.OOZ~/~ Triton 3”roe.

polarographic characteristics Triton X-roe_

x-ith pH.

I o ml11

o-140;

the higher

(X).

UOz(C10~)z.

o.Ioo;

o-1

(A).

iW NaClOa.

It can be seen from Fig. I, that the four curves are divided into four sections_ In section I, alI the curves coincide with the horizontal line of the half-wave potential, -0-177 V. which is the first half-wave potential of the simple uranyl ion and it can therefore be inferred that the complex formation between uranyl ion and L-methionine does nottakeplaceinthisregionofpHvalueandligandconcentration_ due

In section II of Fig_ I, the half-wave potential is shifted to the negative side to the complex formation of uranyl ion with L-methionine. As the values9 of

pKcoon aud pK_2 ligand species for

for methionine are 2-28 and 9.21, respectively, the most probable complexing under these experimental conditions should be iso-

electric dipolar L-methionine ion, CHBS(CHZ)&H(NH~+)COO-. Hence, formula~of the complex may be expressed by UOaM?z+ where M denotes L-methionine ion ; the half-cell electrode reaction may be expressed as UOaMpz+se

=

the general the dipolar

UOzM,++(p-q)M

If the nq&naleoucentratiou~of

L-methionine

is denoted

by C,,,, and

KCOOH

by K,,

POLAROGRAPHY the half-wave

(E,).

OF URAXYL-L-31ETHIOXIXE

potential = (5)s

of the complex

+ 0.06

log K-

-00.06@--){log

227

COMPLEXES

is given

o.o6(p

-

aslo

4) log C,

[H’])}

I-,-log&+

(1)

where K is the ratio of dissociation constants of the oxidized and reduced complex ions. For the greater portion of this section, the pH-value is small enough to give an as compared to K,. Then eqn. (I) reduces to exceedingly large H+ concentration (E&c = const.-oo.06(p-9)

log C,-00.06(p-q)pH

(2)

This equation indicates that the half-wave potential of the complex should be a linear This was verified in this section. The slope function of pH when C, is kept constant. ion is consumed for the reduction of of the line is o.ozg, showin, = that one hydrogen two uranyl ions. However, as the pH-value approaches pk’, and Ka is appreciable as compared to the H+ concentration, the linear relation no longer holds. As the pH value exceeds p&Z, and the Hf concentration becomes negligibly small in comparison with I<,,

eqn.

(E,),

=

(r) then reduces const.

-

0.06Cp -

Hence, a region where the observed_ This corresponds electrode reaction_

q) log C,

(3)

pH is independent of the half-wave potential should be to section III, where no hydrogen ion is involved in the show a third inflexion is greater than 4.00, the curves slope of -o_o2g is obtained_ It indicates that one hydroxyl

When the pH-value and section IV with a mean ion is released

to

in the reduction

of two hydroxylated

pH

uranyl

ions.

C

I3 Z-40

pH 320

017

-Es

Fig.

3

Plots

of

Fig.

4_ l3ectrochromatograms

-E+

US. log

“5

E

S C E.(V)

C,.

pH:

uoy

( A),

Z-I-Z-~;

(

0).

of the uranyl--L-methionine

2-5-4-0;

(X).

complexes

pH 4

300

O-4-7.

pH.

at various

The effect of pH on diffusion current is shown in Fig_ 2. The variation of halfwave potential with pH for the same polarographic solution is also shown for comparison_ It can be seen that the diffusion current constant has a value of 1.52 at pHvalues lower than z_6S, and r-37 at pH-values greater than 2.72. The sudden drop of J_ Elecfroanal.

Chetn.,

12

(1966)

7-25-2zg

zzs

LA1

the diffusion current constant from potential becomes pH-independent, has occurred_

1.5~2 to 1-37 around pH reveals that a change

T.

T.,

CHEKG

2.70, where the half-wave of metal complex species

In order to study the ligand number of the complex, a plot of half-wave tial ‘us. the log of the ligand concentration is sho\vn in Fig. 3_ The slopes of L3E,/;I for the three pH regions, Z-I-2.5, z-5-+0 and 4.~4 7 are of the same -o.ogS, indicating that one more ligand is attached to U(V1) than to U(V) _ Zo?te

H_ 5.

potenlog C, value,

eEectro@wesis

In order to determine the formulae of the complexes, their electrical behaviour was studied by zone electrophoresis. A 7-0 x z-o-cm strip of Toyo No. 52 chromatography paper was cut into three pieces. The two end-pieces were moistened with 0.10 M L-methionine solution_ The centre piece was moistened with 1.0 mM uranyl perchlorate solution containing o-10 M L-methionine solution_ The three pieces had the same pH-value which was varied from 2.4 to 4-47 for each experiment. The three pieces were placed side by side on a glass plate. Platinum electrodes were laid across the ends of the strip and the assembly covered with another glass plate. A potential of 200 V d-c_ was applied for 6 min in each experim ent_ Potassium ferrocyanide was used as developer. The results are shown in Fig. 4_ A control paper, A, indicates the pattern of the chromatogram for zero-potential applied. The shaded areas show the final position of uranium. B, C and D indicate that the complex species at pH 3-40 is cationic, and that at pH 3.20 and 4-37, the complexes are of the same species, a neutral molecule. The results are in good agreement with the prediction made from the Id-pH curve in Fig. Z_ A chromatogram of simple uranyl ion, as a reference, was obtained by moistening the two end-pieces with a very dilute and the centre piece with 1.0 mM uranyl

solution of sodium perchlorate at pH 3.00, perchlorate solution at the same pH as the

end-pieces. The result is given in E, in which the zone has moved about twice as far as in B, toward the negative electrode. As the electrophoretic mobility of simple uranyl ion is essentially equal to that of its complex species, it was concluded that the complex species for B is unit-positively charged. Thus, taking into consideration that the uranyl ion usually shows a co-ordination number of four, the complex species of uranyl-_-methionine complexes were confirmed to be UOa(OH)l&+ at pH 2.40 and UOZ(OH)ZMZ at pH 3-30 and pH 4_37_ TABLE EVIDENCE

PH

I FOR

THE

No_ of H+ DE-

2-1~2.5

COhZPLEX

o-5

4--4-7

or

inuoZued (H+)

z-5-4-o E-5 (OH-)

SPECIES

P-_q I I I

AND

ELECTRODE

Charge U( VI) +I

cl 0

RE9CTIONS

of cornpzex

Complex

species

ut VI)

Ul V)

UOy(OH)Nxf UOz(OH)zMz UOz(OH)zMz

UOz(OH)BG UOz(OH)&(UO+(OH)xM-

Results based on the foregoing data and discussion and the electrode reactions are expressed as follows :

are s nmmarized

in Table

I,

POLAROGRAPHY

at pH

OF

UR%NYL-L-JIETHIOh-IKE

COMPLEXES

229

2.1-2.5,

2

at pH

UO,(OH)M,‘+H++z

e =

3 UO~(OH)M~+H~I++M

3_5-q-0, uOz(0H)zM~

at pH

+ e =

UO,(OH).M-+M

4_*4_7, 2 U02(OH)2M2+2

e =

(UO&(OH)a~I-+3

M+OH-

ICKSOWLEDGEMEKT

The

authors

thank

the

National

Council

on

Science

Development

for

their

support.

The uran3-1-r-methionine complex has been studied using polarography zone electrophoresis over the pH range o-S-4-7 and the ligand concentration with the formufae UOz(OH)Ma+ o.o~o.zo iW at 30 ko_r”. Two complexes UOI(OH)ZMZ, M denoting dipolar L-methionine ion, have been pH-values. The effects of pH and ligand concentration on the current-voltage curves are discussed and the electrode reactions

and range and

confirmed at various characteristics of the represented_

REFERENCES I z 3 4 5 6 7 8 g IO

S. D. D. C. N. N. T. T. 0. T.

J_ PELLETIER, JChim. Phys.. 57 (1960) 297. D_ F’ERRIN, J_ Chenz. SOG;., (1958) 31~5. D. PERRIN. ibid., (1959) zgoJ_ HAWKINS _XKD D. D. PERIUN. Imorg Chew., 1 (1963) 843. C_ LI AKD E. DOODY, /_ Am. Chenz. Sot , 74 (1951) qSq_ c. LI AXD R. -9. ~~A~~IXG. ibid., 77 (1955) 5~25. T- LAI AND S- J_ XVEY, /_ EZecl~ocJ~m. SOG , III (1964) 1183. T. LAI X-D T. L. CHANG. Amal. Chenr., 33 (1961) IIg3_ H. EMERSON, P. L. KIRK XXD C. L. A. SCHMID%-, J. Biol. Chem., gz (1931) T. LAI, S. X_ CHEN, B. C WXNG XYD C. C. HSIEH, dxaL_ CJzaenz., 35 (1963) J.

Electyoazal

CJLem.,

IZ

_t+g 1531. (1966)

zz5-zzg