Accepted Manuscript Pre-harvest drought stress treatment improves antioxidant activity and sugar accumulation of sugar apple at harvest and during storage Laddawan Kowitcharoen, Chalermchai Wongs-Aree, Sutthiwal Setha, Ruangsak Komkhuntod, Satoru Kondo, Varit Srilaong PII:
S2452-316X(17)30315-0
DOI:
10.1016/j.anres.2018.06.003
Reference:
ANRES 175
To appear in:
Agriculture and Natural Resources
Received Date: 10 July 2017 Revised Date:
18 October 2017
Accepted Date: 17 November 2017
Please cite this article as: Kowitcharoen L, Wongs-Aree C, Setha S, Komkhuntod R, Kondo S, Srilaong V, Pre-harvest drought stress treatment improves antioxidant activity and sugar accumulation of sugar apple at harvest and during storage, Agriculture and Natural Resources (2018), doi: 10.1016/ j.anres.2018.06.003. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1
Pre-harvest drought stress treatment improves antioxidant activity and sugar
2
accumulation of sugar apple at harvest and during storage
3 4
Laddawan Kowitcharoena,e,†, Chalermchai Wongs-Areea,b, Sutthiwal Sethac, Ruangsak
5
Komkhuntodd, Satoru Kondoe,†, Varit Srilaonga,b,*
9
Division of Postharvest Technology, School of Bioresources and Technology, King
Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok 10150, Thailand b
Postharvest Technology Innovation Center, Commission of Higher Education, Bangkok
SC
8
a
10
10400, Thailand
11
c
12
Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand
13
d
14
e
Postharvest Technology Program, School of Agro-Industry, Mae Fah Luang University,
M AN U
7
RI PT
6
Research Center (Pakchong), Kasetsart University, Nakhon Ratchasima 30320, Thailand
Graduate School of Horticulture, Chiba University, Chiba 271-8510, Japan
15 Article history:
17
Received 10 July 2017
18
Accepted 17 November 2017
19
Available online
EP
20
TE D
16
Keywords:
22
Abscisic acid (ABA);
23
Ascorbic acid;
24
Ethylene;
25
Storage;
26
Tropical fruit
AC C
21
27 28
*Corresponding author.
29
E-mail address:
[email protected] (V. Srilaong)
30 31
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 32
Abstract
33 Physico-chemical and quality changes in 72 sugar apple (Annona squamosa Linn.)
35
fruits subjected to pre-harvest drought stress were analyzed at harvest and during storage at
36
10ºC or 15ºC, with 90–95% relative humidity. At harvest, the ascorbic acid, sugar and
37
endogenous abscisic acid concentrations increased while the concentration of the substrate
38
indicating a 50% loss in 2,2-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl scavenging activity (DPPH EC50)
39
decreased in fruit from drought-treated trees compared with fruit from well-watered trees
40
(control). The fresh weight loss of fruit stored at 15ºC was higher than at 10ºC, with no
41
significant effect of drought treatment. In contrast, fruit firmness was reduced by drought
42
treatment compared with the control during storage at both temperatures. Respiration,
43
ethylene production and the endogenous abscisic acid and total sugar concentrations were
44
higher in fruit from the drought-treated trees kept at 15ºC. The total ascorbic acid
45
concentration was higher in fruit from drought-stressed trees kept at 10ºC compared with
46
other treatments. This was concomitant with the DPPH EC50 value, which was lowest in fruit
47
from drought-stressed trees stored at 10ºC. These results implied that pre-harvest drought
48
stress treatment activated antioxidant activity and increased sugar concentration in sugar
49
apple fruit. In addition, pre-harvest drought stress hastened fruit ripening. Thus, based on the
50
results, storage of sugar apple fruit at 10ºC is recommended as this induces antioxidant
51
activity which delays chilling injury for 8 d.
52
54
Introduction
EP
53
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
34
The incidence of drought stress during fruit and vegetable production is occurring
56
more frequently with climate change patterns from global warming, which in turn are leading
57
to limited water resources (Whitmore, 2000). Water stress during the production of some
58
agricultural products can influence fruit physiology and morphology, which may affect fruit
59
quality (Toivonen and Hodges, 2011). Abscisic acid (ABA) synthesis is one of the
60
mechanisms in response to water stress in plants; ABA is synthesized and then triggers
61
stomatal closure, thereby reducing water loss via transpiration (Wilkinson and Davies, 2010).
62
Furthermore, the onset of fruit ripening is also accelerated under water deficit conditions,
63
such as in peach (Prunus persica L.; Mercier et al., 2009) and apple (Malus domestica Borkh.;
64
El-Soda et al., 2014). These effects contribute to the production of ethylene, which is
65
coordinated with fruit-ripening processes in many fruits, such as banana (Musa × paradisiaca
AC C
55
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
L.) and strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa D.) according to Barry and Giovannoni (2007).
67
There are many reports of the effect of water stress on fruit quality. Miller et al. (1998)
68
observed that water stress during fruit set decreased the fruit weight but increased the total
69
soluble solids concentration in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa cv. Hayward). Terry et al. (2007)
70
also found higher fructose and glucose concentrations in strawberry subjected to water deficit
71
conditions. Moreover, Pérez-Pastor et al. (2007) showed the benefits of deficit irrigation
72
treatments on apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.), when they observed a slight increase in total
73
soluble solids and firmness at harvest and during cold storage. Under stress conditions,
74
ascorbic acid causes plants to resist stress by reducing the reactive oxygen species constituted
75
by the stress (Ahmed et al., 2014). Thus, the antioxidative system in plants plays an important
76
role in eliminating free radicals from plants under stress conditions. However, the effect of
77
water stress on fruit quality and postharvest change is still complex and variable as water
78
stress affects so many biological processes in plants. Apart from pre-harvest environmental
79
factors, the postharvest control conditions, specifically temperature, greatly affect the visual
80
quality, chemical composition and eating quality of fresh produce. Good management of
81
temperature is the most important and simplest procedure for delaying the deterioration of
82
fresh fruits and vegetables. In addition, the optimum storage temperature can retard softening
83
and color changes of fruits and vegetables, as well as slow down metabolic changes and
84
moisture loss (Nunes, 2008).
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
66
Sugar apple (Annona squamosa Linn.) is a drought tolerant plant cultivated in
86
subtropical and tropical areas (Egydio-Brandão and Santos, 2016). It is an important
87
commercial crop in Thailand, where it is mainly cultivated in the northeast, which is an arid
88
area (Pratcharoenwanich et al., 2014). Drought stress decreased the stomatal conductance and
89
CO2 assimilation rate and increased the soluble sugar and free amino acid concentrations in
90
young sugar apple plants (Rodrigues et al., 2010). A more recent previous study found that
91
endogenous ABA and ascorbic acid concentrations in the leaves and fruit of the sugar apple
92
tree increased under drought conditions (Kowitcharoen et al., 2015). In addition, changes in
93
the respiration rate and the sugar and chlorophyll concentrations in sugar apple fruit during
94
development have also been reported (Pal and Kumar, 1995). With regard to postharvest
95
research, the ripening rate of ‘Balanagar’ sugar apple fruit was delayed when the storage
96
temperature decreased (Vishnu Prasanna et al., 2000). Sugar apple is perishable; therefore an
97
optimum postharvest storage temperature is critical to ensure improved storage life and
98
prevent chilling injury (CI). However, the optimum storage temperature varies in the range
99
7–20°C (Vishnu Prasanna et al., 2000). Broughton and Guat (1979) suggested that storage
AC C
EP
85
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 100
temperatures below 15°C cause CI in sugar apple. In addition, Chunprasert et al. (2006)
101
reported that sugar apple is susceptible to CI at temperatures lower than 13°C. Although several studies have described the physiological and biochemical changes
103
that occur in sugar apple during growth, drought stress and storage, there is little information
104
on the influence of pre-harvest drought treatment on the postharvest quality changes in sugar
105
apple. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the effect of pre-harvest drought
106
stress treatment on sugar apple performance at harvest and during storage at low temperatures.
RI PT
102
107 108
Materials and Methods
110
SC
109 Plant material and treatments
111
The plant material consisted of 6-year-old, fruit-bearing sugar apple trees (Annona
113
squamosa L., cv. ‘Fai’) trained using a modified central leader system, grown in an orchard
114
with sandy loam soil at the Pakchong Research Center, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart
115
University (Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand) located at 14 ᵒN, 101 ᵒE at an altitude of 317 m
116
above mean sea level. The experiment was carried out in a randomized 2 × 2 factorial design.
117
Two irrigation treatments were applied: well-watered (untreated control), where six sugar
118
apple trees were irrigated during the experiment (30 L/tree/day), and a drought treatment,
119
where six sugar apple trees were not watered for 30 d before harvest. The average amount of
120
rainfall during the experiment period was 1.45 mm/day. Guard trees were grown between the
121
untreated control and drought areas. In total, 72 sugar apple fruits, with uniform color and
122
free from defects, were harvested from the six trees in each treatment (12 fruit/tree), 110 d
123
after full bloom, and were composited in each treatment. Harvested fruits were transported to
124
the Postharvest quality assurance laboratory, King Mongkut’s University of Technology
125
Thonburi (Bangkok, Thailand) within 2 hr. The fruits were washed with tap water and dried
126
at room temperature. After drying, the fruits in each group were unpacked and randomly re-
127
divided into two test groups. In the first group, fruits were kept at 15ºC and 90–95% relative
128
humidity, whereas the second group was kept at 10ºC and 90–95% relative humidity. Fruits
129
from each treatment combination were randomly sampled at 2-day intervals to evaluate the
130
fruit quality and biochemical changes, using three replicates. The collected samples were
131
immediately frozen using liquid nitrogen and kept at -80ºC until analysis, and they were
132
lyophilized before analysis.
133
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
112
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 134
Measurement of soil water potential
135 The soil water potential was measured using a tensiometer (Eastern Agritec; Rayong,
137
Thailand). Three tensiometers were randomly installed at 30 cm soil depth under the trees,
138
and 60 cm distance from the trees in each treatment area. Three trees were used for the soil
139
water potential investigation. The soil water potential (measured in bars) was measured at
140
weekly intervals during the drought stress period.
141 142
Analysis of total ascorbic acid concentration
SC
143
RI PT
136
The total ascorbic acid concentration was measured following the method of Roe et
145
al. (1948). A 5 g sample of pulp was homogenized in 20 mL of 5% (weight per volume, w/v)
146
metaphosphoric acid. The homogenate was filtered through filter paper. A 0.4 mL sample of
147
the filtrate was added to 0.2 mL 0.02% (w/v) indophenol solution, and then 2% (w/v)
148
thiourea and 2% (w/v) 2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazine solution were added, respectively. The
149
mixed solution was incubated for 3 hr at 37ºC and then 1 mL 85% (volume per volume, v/v)
150
sulfuric acid was added, and left for 30 min at room temperature. Absorbance was measured
151
at 525 nm using a spectrophotometer (model: UV-1501; Shimadzu; Kyoto, Japan). The same
152
procedure was repeated for a range of ascorbic acid solutions to obtain the standard curve.
155
TE D
154
Analysis of 2,2-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl-radical scavenging activity
EP
153
M AN U
144
Peel and pulp samples (0.1 g dry weight, DW) were homogenized in 20 mL of 80%
157
ethanol and filtered. Analysis of 2,2-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)-radical scavenging
158
activity was carried out according to the method of Kondo et al. (2004). A test sample of 20
159
µL was added to 980 µL of 0.1 M DPPH in ethanol, and the combination was mixed and kept
160
for 20 min at room temperature in the dark. The concentration of the antioxidant sample was
161
made from zero to full inhibition at the point where 50% inhibition of reaction in the solution
162
of the sample and DPPH, and the decrease in absorbance at 516 nm was monitored. The data
163
were shown as EC50 [half maximum (50%) effective concentration] values.
AC C
156
164 165 166
Analysis of sugar concentration
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
The sugar concentration was analyzed as reported previously (Kondo et al., 2014). A
168
1 g dried pulp sample in 10 mL 80% (v/v) ethanol was boiled for 15 min, cooled and then
169
homogenized. The homogenate was filtered and evaporated. The residue was re-dissolved
170
with 3 mL distilled water and analyzed using high performance liquid chromatography
171
(model L-6200; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) with a Shodex ODP2 HP–4E column (Showa Denko;
172
Tokyo, Japan; 4.6 mm internal dimater × 25 cm). The column temperature was set at 30ºC
173
and the mobile phase flow rate was 1 mL/min (75% (v/v) acetonitrile). A refractive index
174
detector was used to identify sugar components.
175 Measurement of ethylene production and respiration rate
SC
176
RI PT
167
177
The sugar apple fruit was placed in an air-tight plastic box (700 mL volume) for 2 hr
179
at 10ºC or 15ºC. A 1 mL sample of headspace gas was collected and analyzed. The
180
respiration rate (production of carbon dioxide from the fruit) was determined using a gas
181
chromatograph (GC–8A; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a 1.8 m packed column of
182
WG–100 at 50ºC and a thermal conductivity detector. The injector temperature was 50ºC, the
183
detector temperature was 80ºC and He gas was used as carrier gas. Ethylene production was
184
analyzed using a gas chromatograph (GC–14B, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a 2
185
m packed column of 80/100-mesh Porapak Q at 80ºC, and a flame ionization detector. The
186
injector temperature was 120ºC, the detector temperature was 120ºC and N2 gas was used as
187
carrier gas.
190 191
TE D
EP
189
Analysis of endogenous abscisic acid concentration
AC C
188
M AN U
178
The analysis of the endogenous ABA concentration was performed according to
192
Kondo et al. (2014) with some modifications. A 0.3 g dried sample was homogenized in 20
193
mL of cold 80% (v/v) methanol with 20 µg ABA–d6 as an internal standard. The homogenate
194
was centrifuged and then filtered through filter paper, and the residue was washed with 20
195
mL cold 80% (v/v) methanol, centrifuged, and filtered again. The filtrate was evaporated,
196
then the aqueous residue was adjusted to pH 2.5 with 0.1 M hydrochloric acid and extracted
197
three times with 20 mL 100% (v/v) ethyl acetate. The ethyl acetate phase was evaporated to
198
dryness, re-dissolved three times in 1 mL ethyl acetate and dried. The residue was re-
199
dissolved in 1 mL 4.8 M acetonitrile containing 20 mM acetic acid, filtered through a
200
nitrocellulose filter, purified using high performance liquid chromatography using an ODS
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Mightysil RP-18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm internal diameter) with a gradient of 4.8–9.6 M
202
acetonitrile containing 20 mM acetic acid over a period of 30 min, and then held in 9.6 M
203
acetonitrile for 5 min. The fraction containing ABA was collected, evaporated to dryness, re-
204
dissolved three times in 0.5 mL methanol and dried in vacuo. The residue was re-dissolved
205
using 1 mL 10% (v/v) methanol in diethyl ester and then methylated with diazomethane for
206
10 min. The methyl ester of ABA was quantified and identified using gas chromatography-
207
mass spectrometry-selected ion monitoring (model QP5000; Shimadzu; Kyoto, Japan) with
208
an InertCap 1 MS column (GL Sciences; Tokyo, Japan; 0.25 mm internal diameter× 30 m,
209
0.25 µm film thickness) and a linear helium flow of 50.2 cm/s. The column temperature was
210
set as follows: 60°C for 2 min, then increasing from 60°C to 270°C at 10 ᵒC /min and finally
211
270°C for 35 min. The ions were measured as ABA–d0 methyl ester/ABA- d6 methyl ester at
212
m/z 190, 260 and 194. The ABA concentration was calculated from the ratio of the peak areas
213
for m/z 190 (d0)/194 (d6). To identify ABA methyl ester in the samples, fragmentation ion
214
patterns were compared with those of the chemical standard in total monitoring mode.
215 216
Measurement of fresh weight loss
217
M AN U
SC
RI PT
201
Three replications of fruit in each treatment were separated for weight loss
219
investigation. The initial weight of each fruit was measured and recorded before storage in
220
the cold room. Fruit were weighed every 2 d. The fruit weight loss (%) was determined as the
221
difference between the initial and final weights and compared with the initial weight.
TE D
218
223
EP
222
Measurement of fruit firmness
225
AC C
224
Three replications of fruit in each treatment were measured for fruit firmness through
226
the peel. Two measurements were taken on the two opposite sides of the fruit using a Texture
227
Analyzer (model: TA-XTPlus, Stable Micro Systems Ltd.; Surrey, England) equipped with a
228
5 mm diameter puncture probe. The penetration speed of the probe was fixed at 5 mm/s and
229
the probe penetrated 10 mm into the fruit. The fruit firmness value was expressed in
230
Newtons.
231 232 233
Statistical analysis
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 234
The data were presented as mean values ± SE. The SPSS analysis of variance
235
procedure (SPSS Inc.; Chicago, IL, USA) was used to determine the treatment effects, and
236
mean separations were analyzed using Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05. A t-test
237
(independent) at the 5% level was used to determine treatment mean differences.
238 Results and Discussion
RI PT
239 240 241
Soil water potential
242
The soil water potentials in the drought-treated area were significantly lower than
244
those in the untreated control area, and gradually decreased over the time of treatment (Table
245
1). In addition, it was found that the value of the soil water potential of the untreated control
246
at 4 wk after treatment was lower than that for 1‒3 wk. This may have been due to the higher
247
water demand during fruit development. Furthermore, the vapor pressure deficit (VPD) was
248
higher in the fourth week (data not shown). VPD drives transpiration in the plant which is
249
influenced by relative humidity and temperature (Gates et al., 1998).
M AN U
SC
243
250
Total ascorbic acid concentration and 2,2-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging
252
activity
253
TE D
251
Ascorbic acid is one of the most important nutritional factors in fruits and vegetables
255
as it is known to have many biological functions in the human body, acting as an antioxidant
256
which could reduce the risk of many diseases such as cardiovascular disease and cancer
257
(Harris, 1996). Moreover, it is also involved in plants undergoing growth and development
258
processes, including their responses to environmental stress (Lee and Kader, 2000). From the
259
results, the highest total ascorbic acid concentrations were found in sugar apple fruit from
260
drought-exposed trees at harvest and at 2 d after storage at 15ºC or 10ºC. On day 6 and day 8
261
after storage, the total ascorbic acid concentration in fruit from drought-exposed trees kept at
262
10ºC was highest, followed by fruit from untreated control trees kept at 10ºC and the fruit
263
from drought-exposed trees kept at 15ºC (Fig. 1A). The increase in ascorbic acid in sugar
264
apple fruit from the drought-treated trees and also in fruit at lower storage temperature may
265
have been caused by abiotic stress conditions. Normally, the stress conditions can induce
266
ABA biosynthesis which can promote H2O2 production during periods of stress; H2O2 is
AC C
EP
254
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 267
classified as a kind of stress signaling that may induce the antioxidant system in plant to
268
maintain or increase the ascorbic acid content (Bayoumi, 2008). Gallie (2013) reported that
269
maintaining a normal level of ascorbic acid in plant cells is a consequence to the tolerance of
270
reactive oxygen species (ROS) from stress conditions without increasing sensitivity to
271
drought conditions. Radical scavenging activity is an indicator of antioxidant functionality and activity
273
and is related to the presence of bioactive compounds (Heim et al., 2002). EC50 refers to the
274
concentration of substrate that indicates a 50% loss in DPPH scavenging activity. A high
275
EC50 value indicates low antioxidant activity. Drought stress for 30 d before harvesting
276
significantly decreased the DPPH EC50 values in both the peel and pulp of sugar apple at
277
harvest (Fig. 1B and 1C). Subsequently, the DPPH EC50 value significantly decreased in the
278
peel of fruit from drought-exposed trees kept at 10ºC, and this was lower than those in other
279
treatments (Fig. 1B).
M AN U
SC
RI PT
272
The fruit from drought-exposed trees kept at 10ºC delayed an increase in the DPPH
281
EC50 value in pulp and had a lower value than in other treatments. The DPPH EC50 value in
282
pulp of fruit from drought-exposed trees kept at 15ºC gradually increased throughout the
283
storage period. At the end of storage, the DPPH EC50 values in pulp of fruit kept at 10ºC were
284
lower than at 15ºC, with no significant differences between treatments (control and drought
285
treatment) at the same storage temperature (Fig. 1C). Alali et al. (1999) reported that sugar
286
apple peel contains many bioactive compounds and that the peel is an important part of the
287
fruit which is exposed to environment, and functions as protection against infection by
288
pathogens and pests. Therefore, to understand sugar apple fruit physiology, the current study
289
involved the measurement of the DPPH scavenging activity in the peel separately from the
290
pulp.
EP
AC C
291
TE D
280
The generation of ROS has been shown to be induced by water deficit (Shao et al.,
292
2008). The enhancement of production and the ability of antioxidants may play an important
293
role in the detoxification of ROS. Samieiani and Ansari (2014) reported that water stress
294
raised the DPPH radical scavenging activity in many groundcover plants. As noted, ascorbic
295
acid has a function as an antioxidant (Noctor and Foyer, 1998). In the current study, the
296
ascorbic acid concentration and DPPH radical scavenging activity were enhanced in fruit
297
from drought-exposed trees at harvest, and 2 d after being held at 15ºC or 10ºC. This
298
suggested that an increase in ascorbic acid concentrations may have a role in the scavenging
299
of free radicals, which accumulate under drought conditions as mentioned earlier. In general,
300
the degradation of ascorbic acid is rapid after harvesting and increases as the storage time and
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
temperature increases (Nunes, 2008). Previous study reported that ascorbic acid concentration
302
in broccoli stored at 1ºC decreased progressively during storage (Serrano et al., 2006). In
303
contrast, the ascorbic acid concentration in citrus fruits (lemon, orange and lime) was higher
304
at 20ºC than at 30ºC (Njoku et al., 2011). These results indicated that the change in the
305
ascorbic acid concentration in a plant is temperature dependent. The current study found that
306
there were higher ascorbic acid concentrations and lower DPPH EC50 values in sugar apple
307
fruit stored at lower temperature after 4 d of storage, especially with fruit from drought-
308
exposed trees. Moreover, the DPPH EC50 values were lower in the peel than in the pulp (Fig.
309
1B and 1C), indicating that sugar apple peel had a higher antioxidant activity than sugar apple
310
pulp. This finding may imply that sugar apple fruit accumulates various antioxidants in the
311
peel to prevent infestation of pests and diseases (Manochai et al., 2014). Although the sugar
312
apple peel is not usually a consumed part of the fruit, as it has high free radical scavenging
313
effects, it is possible that it can be used as a source of antioxidant in the pharmaceutical and
314
food industry. In addition, for greater understanding of the effect of drought stress treatment
315
on the antioxidative system in sugar apple fruit, changes in the enzymatic antioxidant activity
316
should be investigated in future work.
317
319
Sugar concentration
TE D
318
M AN U
SC
RI PT
301
Soluble sugar is one of the major osmotic compounds that accumulate in the fruit of
321
many kinds of fruit trees (Ripoll et al., 2014). The sugar concentration in sugar apple is an
322
important parameter that relates to fruit quality, especially to the taste and has also been
323
related to the response to drought stress (Kowitcharoen et al., 2017). The current study found
324
that the fructose, glucose and total sugar concentrations significantly increased in the fruit
325
from drought-stressed trees at harvest. (Fig. 2A ̶ 2C). Previous studies also reported that
326
drought stress induced sugar accumulation in Satsuma mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc.
327
‘Okitsu-Wase’; Yakushiji et al., 1998) and peach (Kobashi et al., 2000). This suggested that
328
the increase in sugar concentrations may be associated with plant defense mechanisms
329
against drought stress. Sugar acts as a compatible solute that accumulates in cells, which has
330
a role in osmotic adjustment, preventing turgor loss in tissue (Clifford et al., 1998). Moreover,
331
sugar enhancement by drought may improve the quality of sugar apple fruit, as such fruit was
332
sweeter. During storage, the fructose, glucose and total sugar concentrations in fruit from the
333
drought-exposed trees stored at 15ºC significantly increased and were higher than those for
334
the other treatments during the first 4 d of storage (Fig. 2A ̶ 2C). Thereafter, the fructose,
AC C
EP
320
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
glucose and total sugar concentrations increased at 15ºC, and corresponded with increasing
336
ethylene production. At the end of storage, there was no difference in the levels of fructose
337
and glucose in the fruit from control trees stored at 15ºC and the fruit from drought-exposed
338
trees stored at 15ºC or 10ºC, but these levels were significantly higher than those in the fruit
339
from control trees stored at 10ºC (Fig. 2A and 2B). However, the total sugar concentrations
340
were significantly higher in fruit from both control and drought-exposed trees stored at 15ºC
341
compared with fruit stored at 10ºC (Fig. 2C). Vishnu Prasanna et al. (2000) reported an
342
elevated sugar concentration at high temperatures (25ºC and 20ºC) compared with low
343
temperatures (15ºC or 10ºC). Ethylene has been implicated as having a role in the conversion
344
of starch to sugar in fruit (Watkins, 2003). During the ripening process of climacteric fruit,
345
the fruit emit ethylene and the ethylene signal causes the hydrolysis of starch into soluble
346
sugars such as sucrose and glucose, associated with acceleration of amylase in order to
347
increase sweetness (Koning, 1994). This could imply that induction of sugar accumulation in
348
sugar apple fruit during storage was associated with ethylene production. Although high
349
sugar and antioxidant activity were observed in sugar apple fruit from drought-stressed trees,
350
reductions in fruit size and weight were found (data not presented). Cells were smaller in pear
351
fruit (Pyrus communis L.) that had experienced water deficit (Lopez et al., 2011).
M AN U
SC
RI PT
335
353 354
TE D
352
Ethylene production and respiration rate
At harvest, the drought stress treatment had no significant effect on ethylene
356
production and the respiration rate in sugar apple fruit (Fig. 3A and 3B). The ethylene
357
production rate in fruit from the drought treatment that was kept at 15ºC sharply increased to
358
a peak on day 4. The changes in ethylene production in fruit from the untreated control kept
359
at 15ºC or 10ºC showed a similar trend, which increased and reached a peak on day 6 and
360
decreased thereafter (Fig. 3A). This finding agreed with a previous report that water deficit
361
causes an increase of endogenous ethylene, which leads to accelerated ripening of fruit such
362
as bananas (Burdon et al., 1994). Storage temperature affected the rate of ethylene production,
363
where a higher rate was observed in fruit held at 15ºC compared with fruit held at 10ºC,
364
indicating that higher temperatures accelerated physiological changes. These results
365
suggested that drought stress may induce fruit ripening by enhancing ethylene production,
366
especially at higher storage temperatures and as a consequence of the accumulation of a
367
higher sugar concentration.
AC C
EP
355
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Drought stress had no effect on the respiration rate during storage. In fact, increasing
369
the respiration rate in sugar apple fruit positively correlated with increasing the storage time
370
(Fig. 3B). The rate of increase was significantly higher at 15ºC than at 10ºC. These results
371
suggested that low temperatures may slow down the metabolic activities and consequently
372
delay fruit senescence as reported in many studies (Mworia et al., 2012; Freitas and Mitcham,
373
2013; Li et al., 2017). Storage at 10ºC effectively reduced the respiration and ethylene
374
production rate resulting in delayed fruit ripening and retardation of sugar accumulation.
375 376
Endogenous abscisic acid concentration
SC
377
RI PT
368
ABA is an important plant hormone associated with fruit development, physiology
379
and drought stress tolerance (Ripoll et al., 2014). ABA synthesis is a rapid response to
380
drought stress in plants and is also a health-promoting phytochemical that can be found in
381
fruits and vegetables and is effective against diseases such as type II diabetes, obesity-related
382
inflammation and atherosclerosis-induced hypertension (Guri et al., 2007; 2010). To
383
understand sugar apple fruit physiology, changes in the ABA concentration in fruits subjected
384
to drought stress during storage were analyzed in the peel separately from the pulp. This
385
study found that the endogenous ABA concentrations in the peel and pulp of sugar apple fruit
386
from drought-exposed trees at harvest were significantly higher than those in the control,
387
well-watered trees (Fig. 4A and 4B). The increasing ABA concentration may be associated
388
with drought stress tolerance systems (Kowitcharoen et al., 2015). This result was consistent
389
with a previous report that endogenous ABA concentrations in peach fruit increased
390
significantly under drought stress (Kobashi et al., 2000). The synthesis of ABA appeared to
391
change over time during the first 4 d of storage; the ABA concentrations in the peel and pulp
392
of fruit from drought-exposed trees stored at either 15ºC or 10ºC remained higher than those
393
of fruit from untreated trees stored at these temperatures (Fig. 4A and 4B), indicating that
394
drought stress affected the ABA accumulation in the peel and pulp of sugar apple. However,
395
over the following days of storage, temperature also seemed to affect ABA accumulation,
396
where fruit from drought-exposed and untreated trees held at 15ºC had increased ABA
397
concentrations. This result may have been due to drought stress and the higher temperatures
398
inducing fruit senescence, which led to an increase in ABA synthesis. Kondo et al. (2002)
399
reported that trans-ABA may increase with mangosteen fruit senescence. The change in the
400
ABA concentrations in the current experiment implied that a pre-harvest drought stress
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
378
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 401
treatment may provide a way to stimulate the synthesis and accumulation of this beneficial
402
phytochemical in sugar apple.
403 404
Fresh weight loss and fruit firmness
405 The percentage of fresh weight loss in sugar apple fruits from the untreated control
407
and drought-exposed trees kept at 15ºC substantially increased with storage time. While a
408
gradual increase in the weight loss was recorded in sugar apple fruit from untreated control
409
and drought-treated trees kept at 10ºC, there was a significant difference in the fresh weight
410
loss between storage temperatures (Fig. 5). A higher weight loss at higher temperature could
411
be related to the acceleration of transpiration, respiration and ripening as previously reported
412
by Lebibet et al. (1995) and Vishnu Prasanna et al. (2000). In the current study, the rate of
413
respiration increased rapidly at 15ºC (Fig. 3B) and may have been the main factor influencing
414
the weight loss that was observed.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
406
Drought stress treatment for 30 d before harvesting the sugar apple fruit had no
416
significant effect on fruit firmness at harvest (Fig. 6). However, the fruit firmness in all
417
treatments decreased as storage progressed and as storage temperature increased. Fruit from
418
drought-exposed tree stored at 15ºC showed rapid loss of firmness compared with that of
419
other treatments. This could be ascribed to drought stress accelerating fruit softening as
420
mentioned above, and this response may be associated with the induction of ethylene
421
production in response to drought stress. An ethylene-mediated response may up-regulate cell
422
wall modification enzymes and subsequently accelerate softening (Toivonen and Hodges,
423
2011). In addition, the current study found that the decrease in fruit firmness in all treatments
424
had a very high correlation with fresh weight loss (R2 = 0.93, data not shown); this change
425
was due to the fresh weight loss causing a reduction in turgor pressure (Harker and Hallett,
426
1994). These results were in agreement with Shackel et al. (1991) who found a decrease in
427
turgor pressure of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) coincided with losses in fruit
428
firmness.
AC C
EP
TE D
415
429 430
In summary, ascorbic acid, sugar and ABA concentrations and antioxidant activity
431
increased in fruit from drought-exposed trees at harvest. In addition, drought stress also
432
activated antioxidant activity, enhanced sugar accumulation and induced fruit ripening in
433
sugar apple fruit during low temperature storage. The changes in fruit qualities were
434
temperature dependent; at 15ºC the sugar apple ripened faster than at 10ºC. These results
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 435
suggested that pre-harvest drought stress treatments may enhance the eating quality of sugar
436
apples, especially the increase of antioxidant activity and sugar concentration. However, the
437
induction of fruit ripening by drought stress treatment must be considered for application in
438
proper postharvest technology.
439 Conflict of interest
RI PT
440 441 442
There is no conflict of interest.
443 Acknowledgments
SC
444
The authors thank the Thailand Research Fund through the Royal Golden Jubilee PhD
446
program under grant No. PHD/0039/2554 and the Japan Student Service Organization
447
(JASSO) for their financial support.
448 449
References
450
M AN U
445
Ahmed, F., Baloch, D.M., Sadiq, S.A., Ahmed, S.S., Hanan, A., Taran, S.A., Ahmed, N.,
452
Hassan, M. J. 2014. Plant growth regulators induced drought tolerance in sunflower
453
(Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 24: 886–890.
456 457 458
Nat. Prod. 62: 504–540.
Barry, C.S., Giovannoni, J.J. 2007. Ethylene and fruit ripening. J. Plant Growth Regul. 26: 143–159.
EP
455
Alali, F.Q., Liu, X.X., McLaughlin, J.L. 1999. Annonaceous acetogenins: Recent progress. J.
Bayoumi, Y.A. 2008. Improvement of postharvest keeping quality of white pepper fruits
AC C
454
TE D
451
459
(Capsicum annuum, L.) by hydrogen peroxide treatment under storage conditions. Acta
460
Biol. Szeg. 52: 7–15.
461 462 463 464 465 466
Broughton, W. J., Guat, T. 1979. Storage conditions and ripening of the custard apple Annona squamosal L. Sci. Hortic. 10: 73–82. Burdon, J.N., Dori, S., Lomaniec, E., Marinansky, R., Pesis, E. 1994. The post-harvest ripening of water stressed banana fruits. J. Hortic. Sci. 69: 799–804. Chunprasert, A., Uthairatanakij, A., Wong-Aree, C. 2006. Storage quality of “Nang” sugar apple treated with chitosan coating and MAP. Acta Hortic. 712: 857–864.
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 467
Clifford, S.C., Arndt, S.K., Corlett, J.E., Joshi, S., Sankhla, N., Popp, M., Jones, H.G. 1998.
468
The role of solute accumulation, osmotic adjustment and changes in cell wall elasticity
469
in drought tolerance in Ziziphus mauritiana (Lamk.). J. Exp. Bot. 49: 967–977.
470
Egydio-Brandão, A.P.M., Santos, D.Y.A.C. 2016. Nutritional value of the pulp of different sugar apple cultivars (Annona squamosa L.), pp. 195–214. In: Simmonds, Monique S.
472
J., Preedy, Victor R. (Eds.). Nutritional Composition of Fruit Cultivars. Academic
473
Press. United States.
RI PT
471
El-Soda, M., Boer, M.P., Bagheri, H., Hanhart, C.J., Koornneef, M., Aarts, M.G.M. 2014.
475
Genotype–environment interactions affecting preflowering physiological and
476
morphological traits of Brassica rapa grown in two watering regimes. J. Exp. Bot. 65:
477
697–708.
479 480 481 482
Freitas, S.T., Mitcham, E.J. 2013. Quality of pitaya fruit (Hylocereus undatus) as influenced by storage temperature and packaging. Sci. Agric. 70: 257–262.
M AN U
478
SC
474
Gallie, D.R. 2013. Review: Increasing vitamin C content in plant foods to improve their nutritional value-successes and challenges. Nutrients. 5: 3424–3446. Gates, R.S., Zolnier, S., Buxton, J. 1998. Vapor pressure deficit control strategies for plant production, pp. 271–276. In proceedings of 5th IFAC Symposium on Control
484
Applications and Ergonomics in Agriculture. Athens, Greece.
485
TE D
483
Guri, A.J., Hontecillas, R., Si, H., Liu, D., Bassaganya-Riera, J. 2007. Dietary abscisic acid
486
ameliorates glucose tolerance and obesity-related inflammation in db/db mice fed high-
487
fat diets. Clin. Nutr. 26: 107–116.
Guri, A.J., Misyak, S.A., Hontecillas, R., Hasty, A., Liu, D., Si, H., Bassaganya-Riera, J.
EP
488
2010. Abscisic acid ameliorates atherosclerosis by suppressing macrophage and CD4+
490
T cell recruitment into the aortic wall. J. Nutr. Biochem. 21: 1178–1185.
491
AC C
489
Harker, F.R. Hallett, I.C. 1994. Physiological and mechanical properties of kiwifruit tissue
492
associated with texture change during cool storage. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 119: 987–
493
993.
494 495
Harris, J.R. 1996. Subcellular biochemistry, vol.25, ascorbic acid: Biochemistry and biomedical cell biology. Plenum Press. New York, NY, USA.
496
Heim, K.E., Tagliaferro, A.R., Bobilya, D.J. 2012. Flavonoid antioxidant: chemistry,
497
metabolism and structure-activity relationships. J. Nutr. Biochem. 13: 572–584.
498
Kobashi, K., Gemma, H., Iwahori, S. 2000. Abscisic acid content and sugar metabolism of
499
peaches grown under water stress. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 125: 425–428.
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 500
Kondo, S., Ponrod, W., Kanlayanarat, S., Hirai, N. 2002. Abscisic acid metabolism during
501
fruit development and maturation of mangosteens. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 127: 737–
502
741.
504 505
Kondo, S., Yoshikawa, H., Katayama, R. 2004. Antioxidant activity in astringent and nonastringent persimmons. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech. 79: 390–394. Kondo, S., Tomiyama, H., Rodyoung, A., Okawa, K., Ohara, H., Sugaya, S., Terahara, N.,
RI PT
503
506
Hirai, N. 2014. Abscisic acid metabolism and anthocyanin synthesis in grape skin are
507
affected by light emitting diode (LED) irradiation at night. J. Plant Physiol. 171: 823–
508
829. Koning, R.E. 1994. Fruit ripening. Plant physiology information.
SC
509 510
http://plantphys.info/plants_human/fruitgrowripe.shtml, 10 October 2017.
511
Kowitcharoen, L., Wongs-Aree, C., Setha, S., Komkhuntod, R., Srilaong, V., Kondo, S. 2015. Changes in abscisic acid and antioxidant activity in sugar apples under drought
513
conditions. Sci. Hortic. 193: 1–6.
514
M AN U
512
Kowitcharoen, L., Wongs-Aree, C., Setha, S., Komkhuntod, R., Srilaong, V., Kondo, S.
515
2017. Physiological changes of fruit and C/N ratio in sugar apples (Annona squamosa
516
L.) under drought conditions. Acta Hortic. 1166: 195–202. Lebibet, D., Metzidakis, I., Gerasopoulos, D. 1995. Effect of storage temperatures on the
TE D
517 518
ripening response of banana (Musa sp.) fruit grown in the mild winter climate of
519
Crete. Acta Hortic. 379: 521–526.
522 523 524 525 526 527
content of horticultural crops. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 20: 207–220.
EP
521
Lee, S.K., Kader, A.A. 2000. Preharvest and postharvest factors influencing vitamin C
Li, J., Lai, T., Song, H., Xu, X. 2017. MiR164 is involved in delaying senescence of strawberry (Fragaria ananassa) fruit by negatively regulating NAC transcription
AC C
520
factor genes under low temperature. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 64: 251–259.
Lopez, G., Larrigaudière, C., Girona, J., Behboudian, M.H., Marsal, J. 2011. Fruit thinning in ‘conference’ pear grown under deficit irrigation: implications for fruit quality at
harvest and after cold storage. Sci. Hortic. 129: 64–70.
528
Manochai, B., Na Ayudhya, I., Pinthong, S., Komkhuntod, R., Hong, J.H. 2014. Antioxidant
529
activity of different parts from six cultivars sugar apples (Annona squamosa). Agric.
530
Sci. J. 45: 217–222.
531
Mercier, V., Bussi, C., Lescourret, F., Genard, M. 2009. Effects of different irrigation
532
regimes applied during the final stage of rapid growth on an early maturing peach
533
cultivar. Irrigation Sci. 27: 297–306.
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 534 535 536
Miller, S.A., Smith, G.S., Boldingh, H.L., Johansson, A. 1998. Effects of water stress on fruit quality attributes of kiwifruit. Ann. Bot. 1: 73–81. Mworia, E.G., Yoshikawa, T., Salikon, N. et al. 2012. Low-temperature-modulated fruit
537
ripening is independent of ethylene in ‘Sanuki Gold’ kiwifruit. J. Exp. Bot. 63: 963–
538
971.
541 542 543 544 545
RI PT
540
Njoku, P.C., Ayuk, A.A., Okoye, C.V. 2011. Temperature effects on vitamin C content in citrus fruits. Pakistan J. Nutr. 10: 1168–1169.
Noctor, G., Foyer, C.H. 1998. Ascorbate and glutathione: keeping active oxygen under control. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 49: 249–279.
Nunes, M.C.N. 2008. Color atlas of postharvest quality of fruits and vegetables. Blackwell
SC
539
Publishing. Oxford, U.K.
Pal, D.K., Kumar, P.S. 1995. Changes in physico-chemical and biochemical composition of custard apple (Annona squamosa L.) fruits during growth, development and ripening. J.
547
Hortic. Sci. 70: 569–572.
548
M AN U
546
Pérez-Pastor, A., Ruiz-Sanchez, M.C., Martinez, J.A., Nortes, P.A., Artes, F., Domingo, R.
549
2007. Effect of deficit irrigation on apricot fruit quality at harvest and during storage. J.
550
Sci. Food Agr. 87: 2409–2415.
Pratcharoenwanich, R., Sangkaew, S., Kumsueb, B. et al. 2014. Research and development
TE D
551 552
on sugar apple quality in Nakhon Ratchasima province. Khon Kaen Agr. J. 42: 175-
553
182.
554
Ripoll, J., Urban, L., Staudt, M., Lopez-Lauri, F., Bidel, L.P.R., Bertin, N. 2014. Water shortage and quality of fleshy fruits - making the most of the unavoidable. J. Exp. Bot.
556
65: 4097–4117.
558
Rodrigues, B.M., Souza, B.D., Nogueira, R.M., Santos, M.G. 2010. Tolerance to water deficit
AC C
557
EP
555
in young trees of jackfruit and sugar apple. Rev. Cienc. Agron. 41: 245–252.
559
Roe, J.H., Milles, M.B., Oesterling, M.J., Damron, C.M. 1948. The determination of diketo-
560
L-gulonic acid, dehydro-L-ascorbic acid and L-ascorbic acid in the same tissue extract
561
by the 2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazine method. J. Biol. Chem. 174: 201–208.
562
Samieiani, E., Ansari, H. 2014. Drought stress impact on some biochemical and physiological
563
traits of 4 groundcovers (Lolium perenne, Potentilla spp, Trifolium repens and
564
Frankinia spp) with potential landscape usage. JOP. 4: 53–60.
565
Serrano, M., Martinez-Romero, D., Guillén, F., Castillo, S., Valera, D. 2006. Maintenance of
566
broccoli quality and functional properties during cold storage as affected by modified
567
atmosphere packaging. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 39: 61–68.
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 568 569 570 571 572
Shackel, K.A., Greve, C., Labavitch, J.M., Ahmadi, H. 1991. Cell turgor changes associated with ripening in tomato pericarp tissue. Plant Physiol. 97: 814–816. Shao, H.B., Chu, Y., Jaleel, C.A., Zhao, C.X. 2008. Water deficit stress induced anatomical changes in higher plants. C. R. Biol. 331: 215–225. Terry, L.A., Chope, G.A., Bordonaba, J.G. 2007. Effect of water deficit irrigation and inoculation with Botrytis cinerea on strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) fruit quality. J.
574
Agric. Food Chem. 55: 10812–10819.
RI PT
573
Toivonen, P.M.A., Hodges, D.M. 2011. Abiotic stress in harvested fruits and vegetables, pp.
576
39–58. In: Shanker, A.K., Venkateswarlu, B. (Eds.). Abiotic stress in plants -
577
mechanisms and adaptations. InTech. Rijeka, Croatia.
578
SC
575
Vishnu Prasanna, K.N., Rao, S.D.V., Krishnamurthy, S. 2000. Effect of storage temperature on ripening and quality of custard apple (Annona squamosa L.) fruits. J. Hortic. Sci.
580
Biotech. 75: 546–550.
581
M AN U
579
Watkins, C.B. 2003. Principles and practices of postharvest handling and stress, pp. 585–614.
582
In: Ferree, D.C., Warrington, I.J. (Eds.). Apples: Botany, production and uses. CAB
583
Publishing. Wallingford, UK.
585 586 587 588
Whitmore, J.S. 2000. Drought management on farmland. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
TE D
584
Wilkinson, S., Davies, W.J. 2010. Drought, ozone, ABA and ethylene: New insights from cell to plant to community. Plant Cell. Environ. 33: 510–525. Yakushiji, H., Morinaga, K., Nonami, H. 1998. Sugar accumulation and partitioning in satsuma mandarin tree tissues and fruit in response to drought stress. J. Am. Soc.
590
Hortic. Sci. 123: 719–726.
592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599
AC C
591
EP
589
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 600
Table 1 Values (mean ± SE) of soil water potential in untreated control and drought-treated
601
areas within the sugar apple orchard.
602 603 Soil water potential (bar) Untreated control Drought 604 605 -0.09 ± 0.006 ns -0.09 ± 0.006 606 -0.10 ± 0.023 * -0.37 ± 0.029 607 -0.10 ± 0.023 * -0.47 ± 0.040 608 609 -0.06 ± 0.023 * -0.57 ± 0.052 610 -0.31 ± 0.020 * -0.62 ± 0.046 611 * Significant at the 5% level using t-test † ns: non-significant
SC
612 613 614
RI PT
Weeks after treatment Before treatment 1 2 3 4
615
M AN U
616 617 618 619
623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634
EP
622
AC C
621
TE D
620
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 635 636 637 638
RI PT
639 640 641
SC
642 643
M AN U
644 645 646 647
TE D
648 649
652 653 654
AC C
651
EP
650
655
Fig. 1 Total ascorbic acid (A) concentration in sugar apple fruit, and DPPH radical
656
scavenging activity (EC50 value) in peels (B) and pulps (C) of sugar apple fruit subjected to
657
drought stress at harvest and during storage at 10ºC or 15ºC. Data are means ± SE of three
658
replicates. Mean separation in each storage period determined using Duncan’s multiple range
659
test at 5% test level.
660 661
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 662 663 664 665
RI PT
666 667 668 669
SC
670 671
M AN U
672 673 674 675 676 677
681 682 683 684 685 686
EP
680
AC C
679
TE D
678
687
Fig. 2 Fructose (A), glucose (B), and total sugar (C) concentrations in sugar apple fruit
688
subjected to drought stress at harvest and during storage at 10ºC or 15ºC. Data are means ±
689
SE of three replicates. Mean separation in each storage period determined using Duncan’s
690
multiple range test at 5% test level.
691 692 693
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 694 695 696 697 698
RI PT
699 700 701 702
SC
703 704 705
M AN U
706 707 708 709 710
TE D
711 712 713 714
Fig. 3 Ethylene production (A) and respiration rate (B) of sugar apple fruit subjected to
716
drought stress at harvest and during storage at 10ºC or 15ºC. Data are means ± SE of three
717
replicates. Mean separation in each storage period determined using Duncan’s multiple range
718
test at 5% test level.
720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727
AC C
719
EP
715
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 728 729 730 731 732
RI PT
733 734 735 736
SC
737 738 739
M AN U
740 741 742 743 744
TE D
745 746 747 748
Fig. 4 Endogenous ABA concentration in peel (A) and pulp (B) of sugar apple fruit subjected
750
to drought stress at harvest and during storage at 10 or 15ºC. Data are the means ± SE of
751
three replicates. Mean separation at each storage period determined using Duncan’s multiple
752
range test at 5% test level.
754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761
AC C
753
EP
749
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 762 763 764 765 766
RI PT
767 768 769 770
SC
771 772 773
M AN U
774 775
Fig. 5 Fresh weight loss of sugar apple fruit subjected to drought stress at harvest and during
776
storage at 10 or 15ºC. Data are means ± SE of three replicates. Mean separation at each
777
storage period determined using Duncan’s multiple range test at 5% test level.
778
782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795
EP
781
AC C
780
TE D
779
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 796 797 798 799 800
RI PT
801 802 803 804
SC
805 806 807
M AN U
808 809 810
Fig. 6 Fruit firmness of sugar apple fruit subjected to drought stress at harvest and during
812
storage at 10 or 15ºC. Data are means ± SE of three replicates. Mean separation at each
813
storage period determined using Duncan’s multiple range test at 5% test level.
816
EP
815
AC C
814
TE D
811