PRECISION
DENSITY MEASUREMENTS ON DEFORMED AND ALUMINUM SINGLE CRYSTALS* M. J. HORDONt
COPPER
and B. L. AVERBACH:
Measurements of the fractional decrease of density were used to estimate the number of dislocations in annealed and plastically strained single crystals of high-purity copper and aluminum. An almost linear increase in dislocation density with shear strain was observed. Dislocation concentrations of the order of 101O/cmaafter shear stmins in the range 0.1-0.5 were calculated from precision density det,erminations, in good agreement with values obtained from X-ray measurements.
~~~SU~~S PREMISES DE DENSITE DES ~~O~OCRIST~~U~DEFO~~~S DE CUIVRE ET ALUMINIUM Des mesures de la di~ninutionfraction&e de densiti ont et& employees pour Bvaluer le nombre de dislocations dans des monoeristaux t&s puns de cuivre et d’ahnninium qui ont subi un traitement de revenu et une deformation plestique. On a observe une augmentation de la densite des dislocations qui et&itpresque lineaire avec la deformation de cisaillement. Des concentrations de dislocations de l’ordre degrandeur de 101~jcm2ont ete calcules apres des deformations de cisaillement de O,l-9,5 it partir de mesures p&&es de densite, ce qui a Qte en bon aocord avec les valeurs obtenues par rayons X. P~~~~ISIONSDICHTEMESSU~GEN
AN VERFORMT~N
EI~KRISTALL~N
AUS
KUPFER UND ALUMINIUM Aus Messungen der relativen Dichteabnahme wurde die Zahl der Versetzungen in ausgegliihten und plrastischgedehnten Einkris~llen aus Kupfer und Aluminium hoher Reinheit abgeschiztst. Es wurdc eine fast lineare Zunahme der Versetzungsdichte mit der Abgleitung beobachtet. Nach Abgleitungen im Bereioh von 0,I bis 0,5 wurden aus Pr~~ision~i~h~best~mungen Versetzungsdichten von der GroGlenordnung 101O/emeberechnet, die gut mit den Ergebnissen von r~ntgenographischen Messungen iibereinstimmen. 1. INTRODUCTION
A wide variety of experimental techniques has been available for the study of dislocation densities and spatial distributions in both annealed and in plastically strained crystals. In a previous paper@) (hereafter called Ref. l), estimates of dislocation density as a function of plastic strain were derived from doublecrystal X-ray rocking curve broadening for highpurity copper and aluminum single orystals. The present paper reports the results of precision hydrostatic density measurements on the same crystals in an effort to provide independent estimates of the dislocation density for comparison. Since the deformation was carried out at room temperature, the only defects considered stable enough to remain were line defects such as edge and screw dislocations. 2. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE Cylindrical single crystals, 5 in. long by 5/S in. diameter, of high-purity copper and aluminum were * This paper is taken from a thesis submitted by M. J. Hordon in partial f~~llment of the requirements for the Sol?. degree in Metallurgy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Received May 9, 1960; revised September 6, 1960. M~~o~;~~tt;ddress: The Alloyd Corporation, Cambridge, chiz;;artment
of Metallurgy, M.I.T.,
ACTA METALLURGICA, 6-w
PP 1
VOL.
Cambridge, Massa-
9, MARCH
1961
grown from the melt by the Bridgman technique. Flat tensile specimens with dimensions 1.5-2.5 in. in length, 0.375 in. in width and O.OSO-0.~00 in. in thickness in the gage section were prepared from these crystals with surfaces parallel to within -&!i” of the (Ill) and flOO>pl anes for copper and the (100) plane for aluminum, as reported in Ref. (1). Changes in density after plastic deformation were measured by a differential hydrostatic weighing technique similar to that of Be1S2). The apparatus consisted of a semimicro balance with a sensitivity of 1 x 10-s g. Specimen and standard crystals were suspended by platinum wires from the balance arms and were immersed in a weighing liquid of l-2 dibromopropane (p = 1960 g/ml) in turn contained in a water bath maintained at 25% f O.Ol”C. The temperature was controlled by a mercury thermoregulator and both weighing liquid and water bath were continuously stirred to ensure equilibrium heat distribution. Density changes were determined by a di~erential technique which involved weighing the test specimen as annealed and after deformation against an annealed standard in air and in the weighing liquid. The advantages of this method were that the temperature and variation of density with temperature of the weighing liquid did not have to be determined as long as the temperature was everywhere uniform, and errors due
247
ACTA
248
METALLURGICA,
Resolved
sheor
VOL.
stress
9, 1961
( kg/mm2)
jcj3K
Al
0.8 I
I
Resolved
sheor
I .o
0
I
stroin
y
0.8 -
.
.”
FIG. 1. Influence of applied shear stress and prior shear strain on hydrostatic density of copper and aluminum single crystals.
to a change in depth of immersion
of suspension wires
and changes in surface tension of the weighing liquid were cancelled
of the test specimen AP_
( W, -
the differential
W,)U d, do p (W, M -[---
where p is the absolute specimen
weight,
density
change
has been given as w
P --L M
-
~~
l-
(WI -
W,Y
( W, -
W,)%,
a0 WoY 4 -
specimen
density,
do is the density
weighing
M is the
(W, -
is negligible in this case, and a0 < do, equation
Wo)” (1) can
be simplified :
P
mize the weight difference (W, men and standard to
crystal
minimize
should be closely In the
differences.
present case, the crystals weighed about 10 g and were prepared
by etching
to have a weight
weighing in the
The results are shown in density
change Apjp is
difference \<
shear stress and shear strain values from tensile data in a manner reported
decrease nearly linearly as a function
of shear stress
and strain, and in the strain range studied, copper and aluminum resolved
showed
the same variation
shear strain.
Extrapolation
of Aplp with of the curve in
Fig. 1 to a shear strain y of 0.6 (tensile strain F N 0.3)
Clarebrough
W,)“, and the speci-
weights
volume
hydrostatic
in Ref. (1). As Fig. 1 shows, the density was found to
agreement
p (WI - WOY -. M do - a0
To reduce errors, M should be large in order to maxi-
matched
Resolved
were computed
gave -ApIp
AP _
DISCUSSION
were made after plastic deformation
Fig. 1 in which the fractional
of the weighing
Because
change
plotted against residual shear strain and applied shear
steps before and after straining,
in liquid and air, respectively.
AND
shear strain range 0.1-0.5.
1 (1)
density
of the density of copper and alumi-
num crystals by the differential
stress.
a0
of the relative
x 10-s.
3. RESULTS
Measurements technique
liquid, a, is the density of air, and Wnd, Wna denote the sequential
The accuracy
was about 51
out.
For this technique,
1
50 mg.
a value of about 1 x 10-4, in very good with the value of 0.9 x 1O-4 reported et uZ.(~) for copper deformed
by
30 per cent in
compression. Estimates
of dislocation
concentration
N were de-
rived from the decrease in crystalline density following the analysis of Stehle and Seegert4) using the expression
N = -APIP 2b2
HORDON
AVERBACH:
AND
PRECISION
DENSITY
MEASUREMENT
values are in good agreement 10n/cm2
calculated
from
et &.(a) for deformed
with the value of 1.1 x
the
changes
data
of Clarebrough
cooper.
4. CORRELATION
Estimates
249
OF RESULTS
of dislocation
in crystal
density
density
for
calculated
plastically
from
strained
copper and aluminum are compared in Table 1 along with values derived from X-ray rocking curve broadening measurements seen that
the
reported
X-ray
and
within a factor of 2; in
calculating
in Ref. (1).
density
thus the assumptions
dislocation
It can be
methods
densities
agreed involved
appear
fairly
reasonable. TABLE 1. ‘Density of dislocations in cold worked copper and aluminum single crystals Shear strain (y)
1 0. I
0
0.3
0.2 Resolved
shear
0.4
0.5 COppI
strain
FIG. 2. Dislocation densities calculated from hydra. static density measurements.
where
b is the
Burger’s
vector.
The
expression
assumes that the screw and edge components dislocations
are equal.
The volume
effect
defects such as vacancies can be reasonably since
vacancies
rapidly
would
be expected
after room temperature
to
of the of other
discounted anneal
deformation
out
of high-
___.-. 0.102 0.244 0.447 -~ __~_ 0.116 0.220 0.421
of dislocation
density
I
/
I x 10’0
1~
3 x 10’0 5 x 10’0
’
9 x 109
:
1 x 10’0 3 x 10’0 8 x 10’0
2 x 10’0 9 x 10”’
Aluminum
.~
7 x 109 2.5 x lo’* 4 x 10’0
* X-ray values of disloca,tion density taken from Ref. (1).
purity copper and aluminum. The resulting variation
Dislocation density IV (cm-1)
~~~ ~~~. ._.__
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
with
that N varied linearly for copper in the linear harden-
The authors are grateful to the United States Atomic Energy Conlmission and to the M.I.T. Instru-
ing strain range (Stage II of the single crystal tensile
mentation
curve) whereas the curve for aluminum
Force for sponsoring
residual shear strain is shown in Fig. 2. It is apparent
linearity
in the strain range above 0.2 corresponding
to the region where cross slip occurred Ref. (I).
departed from
The linear portion
(Stage III) see
of the curve is described
by the expression
and
like also to acknowledge Dr. A. It. Rosenfield,
the
United
this investigation.
States
the advice and cooperation Professor
Air
They would
D. A. Thomas
of and
G. Langford. REFERENCES
N = Ky where the constant
Laboratory
(4)
K is approximately
for copper and 0.8 x 10n/cm2
1 x 10n/cm2
for aluminum.
These
I. M. J. HORTONandB. L. AVERBACH, Acts. Met. 9,237 (1961). 2. G. A. BELL, Aust. J. A&. Sci. 9, 236 (1958). 3. L. M. CL.AREBROUGH, M. E. H~RGREAVESand C. IV. WEST, Acta Met. 5, 738 (1957). 4. H. STEIKE and A. SEEOER,2. Php-. 149, 217 (1956).