ESC-based heart therapy

ESC-based heart therapy

Drug Discovery Today: Disease Models DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY DISEASE MODELS Vol. 9, No. 4 2012 Editors-in-Chief Jan Tornell – AstraZeneca, Sweden A...

826KB Sizes 1 Downloads 108 Views

Drug Discovery Today: Disease Models

DRUG DISCOVERY

TODAY

DISEASE

MODELS

Vol. 9, No. 4 2012

Editors-in-Chief Jan Tornell – AstraZeneca, Sweden Andrew McCulloch – University of California, SanDiego, USA

Induced pluripotent stem cells

Preclinical animal models for testing iPSC/ESC-based heart therapy Francesca Stillitano1, Ioannis Karakikes1, Kevin D. Costa1, Kenneth Fish1, Roger J. Hajjar1, Jean-Se´bastien Hulot1,2,* 1 2

Cardiovascular Research Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, USA UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR_S 956, Paris, France

Embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cell (ESC/

Section editor: Ronald Li – LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, and Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

iPSC) technologies offer an unprecedented possibility of devising cell replacement therapies for numerous disorders, including cardiovascular diseases. Studies are progressively investigating whether ESC or iPSC can serve to restore physiological function of diseased hearts in vivo. However, the animal model, the population of ESC/iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes and the delivery technique need to be optimized before these cells can be used effectively for cell replacement therapy. In this review, we describe the potential applications, limitations and challenges of iPSC- and ESCbased heart therapies in preclinical animal models.

Introduction Pluripotent stem cells have the ability to differentiate into cell types of all three germ layers, including cardiac and vascular cells [1–3]. Human embryonic stem cells (ESCs), which are derived from the inner cell mass of blastocyst stage embryos, have the unique ability to self-renew indefinitely while maintaining the potential to give rise to all cell types in the human body [4]. The revolutionary discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), whereby a patient’s somatic cells can be reprogrammed into an embryonic pluripotent state by the forced expression of a defined set of transcription factors [5], has provided another source of stem cells enabling *Corresponding author.: J.-S. Hulot ([email protected]) 1740-6757/$ ß 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

in vitro disease modeling and drug testing, and in vivo cell replacement therapies [6]. The heart is one of the least regenerative organs in the body and consequently, loss of cardiomyocytes after injury (i.e., infarction or other diseases) often leads to heart failure. Hence, a large number of mature ventricular myocytes are needed for replacement therapy. However, human donor hearts and cardiomyocytes are in extremely limited supply, motivating a demand for alternative cardiomyocyte sources. Moreover, in contrast to cardiomyocytes, the use of less mature stem cell-derived progenies (i.e., cardiovascular progenitors) might not only restore myocardial tissue but could also contribute to revascularization and augment contractility via direct or indirect cell–cell interactions. Different types of autologous cells (including skeletal myoblasts, hematopoietic stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells) have been tested in preclinical and early-stage clinical trials but with inconsistent results [7–9]. It is now widely agreed that these cells do not form a significant amount of new myocardium. Instead, their potential benefit is linked to nonmyogenic mechanisms such as reduced ventricular dilation or paracrine activation of cytoprotective signaling pathways [10,11]. The seminal achievement of pluripotency holds great promise for regenerative medicine and the use of ESC or iPSC as a cell source for cardiac repair has thus become an emerging and exciting field.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ddmod.2012.04.004

e229

Drug Discovery Today: Disease Models | Induced pluripotent stem cells

Vol. 9, No. 4 2012

Smooth muscle

Ectoderm (SOX1, PAX6)

ES/iPS cells

Oct4 NANOG SOX2

Primitive streak mesoderm

Cardiac committed mesoderm

Brachyury T MIXL-1

MESP1,2 Flk-1

Cardiac progenitors cells

Early Cardiomyocytes

NKX2.5 GATA4 Tbx5 Mef2C

Late Cardiomyocytes

NKX2.5 MYH

cTnT αActin MLC2a MLC2v SCN5A CACNA IRX4

Haemangioblast

Blood

Endothelium

Endoderm (SOX17, FoxA2)

Molecules belonging to the TGFβ superfamily

0

?

Specific Wnt/β-catenin pathway antagonists

5

?

?

10

20

Differentiation Days Drug Discovery Today: Disease Models

Figure 1. Schematic representation of cardiac differentiation from pluripotent stem cells.Cardiac differentiation process starts by the introduction of exogenous factors (TGFb superfamily proteins) which induce the primitive streak mesoderm. The processes which follow this step are still not clear. However, the later introduction of a Wnt signal inhibitor will push the cells further to form cardiomyocytes. Each step of differentiation is represented by the expression of specific transcription factors.

Although mouse ESC were first isolated in 1981 and human ESC have been available for more than a decade [4], studies involving their transplantation into the heart have begun only recently. A series of studies have recently demonstrated that iPSC form functional cardiovascular cell lineages with similar efficiency as ESCs in vitro. Overall, only a limited number of studies have investigated whether ESC or iPSC can serve to restore physiological function of diseased hearts in vivo. One of the reasons is linked to the ability of undifferentiated embryonic stem cells to form teratomas, an encapsulated tumor that contains tissue components resembling normal derivatives of all three germ layers, when transplanted into normal or diseased hearts. Similar concerns have been raised with IPS cells. As a consequence and in contrast to other cell types used for therapies, transplantation of ESC or iPSC will require some degree of predifferentiation to restrict the cells’ repertoire and prevent tumor growth (Fig. 1). Different protocols are progressively proposed to achieve an efficient cardiogenesis of ESC and/or iPSC and thus support their use in in vivo models. e230

www.drugdiscoverytoday.com

At this time, the in vivo testing of iPSC- and ESC-based heart therapies remains limited and substantial challenges must be addressed and resolved before successful translation to human patients. As described below, the key issues include: 1. Defining the optimal animal model, 2. Identifying the optimal stem cells to be delivered, 3. Determining the optimal stem cell delivery route to the myocardium, 4. Defining the appropriate endpoints post-delivery.

Defining the optimal animal model Table 1 summarizes selected ESC and iPSC heart transplantation studies in animals conducted to date. Initial studies were conducted in naı¨ve animals and have demonstrated the capacity of ESC-derived cardiomyocytes to form new myocardium in uninjured hearts. In these studies, embryoid body-based differentiation was performed and then enriched for cardiomyocytes either by physical dissection of beating areas [12,13] or by Percoll gradient centrifugation [14]. The cardiomyocyte purity was about 60–70% with the majority of remaining cells exhibiting an epithelial phenotype. Interestingly, after

Vol. 9, No. 4 2012

Drug Discovery Today: Disease Models | Induced pluripotent stem cells

Table 1. Summary of selected ESC and iPSC implantation studies Referencea

Type of stem cell

Animal model

Delivery

Maximal follow-up

Heart function

Laflamme, 2007 [19]

Human ESC-derived CM + prosurvival cocktail

- Athymic nude rats - I-R injury (60 min)

Direct injection 4 days after I/R

28 days

Significant improvement of contractile function in ESC treated rats

Dai, 2007 [18]

Human ESC-derived CM

- Athymic nude rats - I-R injury (15 min)

Direct injection 5 min after coronary occlusion

28 days

N/A

Kolossov, 2006 [16]

Mouse ESC-derived CM

Syngeneic mice MI by LCA ligation or cryolesion

Direct injection at the time of surgery

28 days

Significant improvement of contractile function in ESC treated animals

Van Laake, 2007 [17]

Human ESC-derived CM

SCID mice MI by LCA ligation

Direct injection at the time of surgery

12 weeks

Transient improvement of contractile function at week 4 in ESC treated mice; no differences at week 12

Caspi, 2007 [15]

Human ESC-derived CM

SD rats MI by LCA ligation

Direct injection 7–10 days after surgery

60 days

Significant improvement of contractile function in ESC treated rats

Bel, 2010 [48]

Primate ES-derived CM

Rhesus monkeys I-R injury (120 min)

Composite cell sheet applied 2 weeks after surgery

4 weeks

Non-significant for improvement; no teratoma formation

Mauritz, 2011 [54]

Mouse iPSC-derived cardiovascular progenitors

SCID mice MI by LCA ligation

Direct injection at the time of surgery

14 days

Significant improvement of contractile function in iPSC treated animals

a First author, year. Embryonic stem cell (ES), induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC), cardiomyocyte (CM), ischemia-reperfusion (I-R), myocardial infarction (MI), left coronary artery (LCA), Sprague Dawley (SD), severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID).

transplantation into naı¨ve athymic (nude) rat myocardium, there was a progressive enrichment of cardiomyocytes and loss of the epithelium. Human cardiomyocyte grafts volume increased seven-fold over a 4-week period [14] because of robust proliferative capacity both in vitro and in vivo [14,15]. Moreover, unlike skeletal myoblast-grafts, the ESC-derived cardiomyocytes were able to achieve some electrical integration with surrounding host myocardium [12]. All of the transplantation studies in pathological hearts have been conducted in the context of ischemic injury. Most of the studies were conducted in rodent models of myocardial infarction (MI) following permanent [15–17] or temporary (ischemia/reperfusion infarct) [18,19] coronary artery ligation. This injury model is clinically relevant because ischemic cardiomyopathy is the leading cause of death among people in industrialized nations and the leading cause of heart failure. By contrast, the infarcted heart (especially at an early stage) is a harsh environment for the transplantation of cells because of reduced blood flow in the infarcted area, the increased ischemic injury in the remote area, the progressive loss of matrix integrity, the abnormal tissue mechanical properties, and the cellular inflammatory response. As a consequence, the engraftment success rate is significantly lower in infarcted than in normal hearts [19,20].

Even if significant differences exist between protocols (mainly animal models, timing of injection, differentiation protocols) as shown in Table 1, all of these studies were able to demonstrate the presence of stable cell grafts within the infarcted tissue. The grafted ESC-CMs or iPSC-CMs were mainly found as confluent cell clusters in the infarct border zone. Functional studies showed that transplantation of ESCor iPSC-CMs improved the left ventricular contractile function or at least prevented its worsening as compared to nontreated animals. This improvement was however noted on short-term evaluation of cardiac function (i.e., 1 month after ESC- or iPSC-CMs administration) but was transient in one study that also performed 3-month follow-ups. This result was reproduced in an independent experiment using a higher amount of injected cells [21] thus raising concerns about the long-term impact of ESC-CMs administration. Interestingly, there was a manifest graft survival without reduction in graft size up to three months after ESC-CM administration. Van Laake et al. found that 80–95% of the surviving donor cells had a cardiomyocyte phenotype thus raising concerns whether the generated cardiomyocytes are adhering to and in communication with the surrounding myocardium and are thus able to contribute to the systolic force generation. The development of electromechanical junctions between www.drugdiscoverytoday.com

e231

Drug Discovery Today: Disease Models | Induced pluripotent stem cells

the grafted cells and the surrounding host cardiomyocytes is required for synchronous contraction. Expression of connexin 43, a marker of electrical coupling normally found in gap junctions between cardiomyocytes, has been reported in some grafted cells but with limited formation of mature junctional structures. Similarly, the organization of desmosomes (which provide mechanical continuity between cardiomyocytes) in grafted cells is largely unknown [17]. The choice of the animal model might impact the issue of cell– cell interaction [12]. It is likely that human ESC- or iPSC-CM fail to couple to rodent host myocardium because human cells cannot keep up with high heart rate of a rodent. The use of large-animal models for testing human-derived cardiac stem cell therapies should thus be preferable, but appears to be very limited so far. In an elegant study, Blin et al. administered Rhesus ESC-derived cardiovascular progenitors (selected on the SSEA-1 cell surface marker) into a Rhesus monkey model of MI [22] created by a 90-min coronary occlusion/reperfusion protocol; the selected cells were injected 2 weeks later in the infarcted area during an openchest surgery. These cells engrafted into the infarcted monkey hearts and differentiated into morphologically mature cardiomyocytes. Other large-animal preclinical models could be proposed to study cardiac stem cell therapies, especially pigs which have well-documented morphological and functional similarities to humans. Larger animals are also more compatible with minimally invasive catheter-based techniques for inducing MI [23] thus avoiding many unwanted complications of open-chest surgery. While isolation of ESC have not yet been achieved in these animals, recent studies have shown that porcine somatic cells (i.e., skin fibroblasts) can be reprogrammed into pig-iPS cells using transfer of the standard Yamanaka reprogrammation factors [24]. The generation of pig-iPSC and their potential to further differentiate into the three embryonic germ layers open new possibilities for the preclinical application of iPSCs. From a theoretical point of view, iPSC technology offers the opportunity to perform autologous transplantation, thus circumventing the rejection issues seen with xeno- or allo-transplantation. To ensure the survival of grafted cells coming from other species or from other animals, investigators often use immunosuppressive agents (mainly cyclosporine A) in immunocompetent animals. It has recently been shown that cyclosporine inhibits the opening of mitochondrial permeability-transition pores and thereby limits myocardial injury that occurs after ischemia-reperfusion [25], possibly impacting the conclusions drawn from such studies. Alternatively, researchers have used immunodeficient animals (such as SCID mice), which restricts investigation to small animal models. Therefore, the expanded development and optimization of large-animal preclinical models in which autologous iPSC-derived cells can be used for implantation is considered a critical step e232

www.drugdiscoverytoday.com

Vol. 9, No. 4 2012

toward the successful translation of stem cell therapies for patients in need of cardiac repair.

Identifying the optimal stem cells to be delivered As previously mentioned, it is critical that ES or iPS cellderived preparations intended for in vivo transplantation require some degree of pre-delivery differentiation to avoid the formation of tumors arising from undifferentiated pluripotent stem cells (Fig. 1). Teratoma formation in treated hearts could cause life-threatening events such as fatal arrhythmias, cardiac tamponnade, and heart failure. Therefore, given the heterogeneous cell mixture within embryoid bodies (EBs), purification of cardiac cells is crucial not only to eliminate remaining undifferentiated cells, but also to derive a pure population of differentiated cardiomyocytes. Although EB dissection and centrifugation sorting techniques have been used to enrich cardiomyocyte selection [26,27], the achieved purity is probably insufficient for clinical purposes. Alternatively, the generation of transgenic ESC allows the identification and selection of differentiating cardiomyocytes. This approach uses a cardiac-specific promoter to drive expression of a selectable marker or reporter gene. For example, the ventricular human myosin light chain 2v (MLC2v) promoter can be used to create a stable transgenic hESC lines in which eGFP-expressing cells, appearing during in vitro differentiation, can be identified and sorted [28]. A similar strategy can be used to specifically enrich atrial versus ventricular myocytes [29]; however, genetic modification is required. To overcome this limitation, a fluorescent dye that labels mitochondria has been used to selectively mark ES/iPS cell-derived cardiomyocytes [30], yielding highly pure cardiomyocytes (99% purity) obtained by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Such nongenetic methods can be powerful tools in the clinical setting. Several studies found no teratomas in hearts transplanted with cardiomyocytes or cardiac progenitors derived from purified ES cells [19,31], suggesting the risk of tumor formation might be low after appropriate cell sorting. However, further analysis of the therapeutic potential of ES/iPS cells and their progeny, including the risk of teratoma-forming propensity in animal models with long-term follow-up, is required before cell therapy with human iPS cells can advance to clinical trials. Because ESCs are not of patient origin, the immune response problem must be addressed. Transplant rejection occurs due to allelic differences in the surface antigens expressed by donor and recipient. There are three distinct types of transplantation antigens: ABO blood group antigens, minor histocompatibility antigens and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. All three are expected to be found in cell populations used to create cardiac grafts. However, allelic differences in MHC molecules are, by far, the most significant immunological barrier to organ transplantation, including ESC-derived cell transplants. Undifferentiated

Vol. 9, No. 4 2012

Drug Discovery Today: Disease Models | Induced pluripotent stem cells

hESCs are sometimes called ‘immunoprivileged’ because they express low levels of class I MHC (MHC-I) molecules [32–34]. Unfortunately, MHC-I expression increases 10-fold with the induction of differentiation [34]. Thus, stem cell graft rejection may be elicited when the recipients’ allogeneic T cells recognize the foreign MHC-I surface molecules, whether differentiation occurs before or after transplantation. Several methods have been proposed to address immunorejection [35]. Among them, derivation of ESCs that have their MHC [also called human leukocyte antigen (HLA) in humans] matched with the patient’s could be a potential method for minimizing immunorejection in ESC transplantation [36,37]. Moreover, the development of iPSC-derived differentiated cells has been expected to provide personalized sources for cell-based therapy. iPS cells were originally believed to be non immunogenic. However, recent data have raise concerns about the potential immunogenicity of these cells. A recent study reported that the transplantation of immature iPSCs induced a T-cell-dependent immune response even in a syngeneic mouse, likely due to abnormal gene expression [38]. This immunogenicity could be linked to the over-expression of minor antigens [38], potentially resulting from punctual mutations in the coding sequences of iPSCs [39] or the epigenetic regulation of iPSCs [40]. Therefore, the immunogenicity of therapeutically valuable cells derived from patient-specific iPS cells must be carefully evaluated before clinical application into human patients. The use of ESC/iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes for basic developmental research and large-scale applications, such as largeanimal preclinical studies, has been hampered by their poor yield from typically heterogeneous stem cell cultures. This challenge was in part solved by studies that carefully tested signaling molecules and intracellular mediators that are known to drive cells in the earliest steps of cardiac development under normal conditions (Fig. 1). Some small molecules have the potential to enhance the differentiation from ES cells to specific tissue cells. A high-throughput screening system has been used to identify such small molecules [41,42], revealing that ascorbic acid [43], activin A and bone morphogenetic protein-4 [31] enhance the differentiation of ESCs into cardiomyocytes. Thus, by optimizing growth factor combinations and timing, cardiac myocyte differentiation rate can be increased and, importantly, the new protocols can be applied to essentially all pluripotent stem cell lines including iPS cells [44,45].

around the infarcted myocardium. Cell retention and survival is consistently low when injected into the myocardium, and even lower with intracoronary infusion [19,46,47]. Therefore, alternative methods, including epicardial deposition of cellularized biomaterial, have been recently proposed. The underlying concept is to provide an external supply of cardiac-specified stem cells through a three-dimensional (3D) construct made of cardiac progenitors and feeder cells placed on a composite cell sheet. The cell sheet is then applied on the infarcted area during cardiac surgery. In a non-human primate model, it has been shown using this technique that progenitor cells migrated to the myocardium with a robust engraftment [48]. The development of substrate-mediated cell therapy which takes advantage of the ability of biomaterial sheets to act as a flexible patch, while enabling direct apposition of exogenously introduced cells, has also been reported [49]. A recent percutaneous technique for gelfoamenabled pericardial delivery of cells to the infarcted myocardium offers another promising approach for stem cell therapies [50]. Finally, there is little evidence to support the intuitively attractive idea that the adult mammalian heart provides a ‘cardiogenic environment’ that will drive maturation and orientation of cardiac myocytes from pluripotent stem cells. An alternative approach to address this issue relies on tissue engineering of cardiac muscle from human ESCs and iPSCs. In two recent publications [51,52], it has been shown that the ex vivo combination of ESC/iPSC with polymeric scaffolds allows the generation of tissue-engineered muscle constructs. The engineered tissues show coherent contractions 5–10 days after casting. They display a dense network of longitudinally oriented, interconnected and cross-striated cardiomyocytes, suggesting that the 3D tissue format improves the maturation of cardiomyocytes, although they remained genetically similar to EBs [51]. It has been suggested that a geometrically straight structure of the tissue and cyclic strain favor cardiomyocytes maturation [51]. In one study, human bioengineered cardiac tissues was transplanted onto the epicardium of a healthy athymic rat heart, showing graft survival and connection to the host myocardium and coronary circulation [52]. These data suggest that in vivo engraftment of engineered cardiac tissue created from ESC- or iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes represents an interesting alternative strategy to direct cell injection therapy that warrants further investigation.

Determining the optimal stem cells delivery route to the myocardium

Defining the appropriate endpoints post-delivery

Cell viability and integration into the host anatomical structure is an additional challenge to stem cell therapy for cardiac repair. In most studies, ESC- and iPSC-based therapies have been administered through conventional needle-based intramyocardial injections. While the number of cells and injections may vary, the common concept is to deliver cells in or

Finally, there is a need to better define the different endpoints that will be used to provide an overall assessment of ESC/ iPSC-based heart therapies. Most prior studies have qualitatively assessed the presence of engrafted cells in the myocardium of transplanted animals. However the quantitative assessment (i.e., the proportion of cells engrafted/cells transplanted) has proven challenging. Several approaches have www.drugdiscoverytoday.com

e233

Drug Discovery Today: Disease Models | Induced pluripotent stem cells

Vol. 9, No. 4 2012

Primitive streak mesoderm

Cardiac committed mesoderm Cardiac progenitors cells Early Cardiomyocytes

Identifyin g the op tima l stem cells to be delivered

Late Cardiomyocytes

ES/iPS cells

Rodents

Large animals

Non human primates

Defining the optimal animal model heart rate ~ 500 bpm

very similar physiology to human, very expensive, animal ethics

physiology and anatomy similar to human (~100 bpmbpm); used for pharmaceutical testing, large to keep, expensive, animal ethics

Determining the optimal stem cells delivery route to the myocardium

needle-based intramyocardial injections Cell sheets, biodegradable polymeric scaffold bioengineered cardiac tissues

Defining the appropriate endpoints post-delivery

Pressure

Ejection

Isovolumetric relaxation

Stroke Volume

Isovolumetric contraction

Filling

PV-Loop (invasive)

MRI non-invasive Drug Discovery Today: Disease Models

Figure 2. Schematic representation of critical steps for testing iPSC/ESC-based heart therapy in preclinical models.

been recently proposed to enable non-invasive stem cell tracking thus helping to follow their migration, homing, division and differentiation after transplantation. MRI cell tracking is particularly appealing in cardiology as it would e234

www.drugdiscoverytoday.com

allow a simultaneous assessment of cell engraftment and cardiac function. Different approaches including MRI-based reported gene technology [53] have been proposed but their utility in tracking ES/iPS cells fate remain undetermined.

Vol. 9, No. 4 2012

Other studies have suggested measuring the graft size as a surrogate of cell engraftment [54]. There is a growing consensus that changes in left ventricular ejection fraction might not fully reflect the impact of ESC/iPSC transplantation on cardiac remodeling and cardiac function. Ideally, global cardiac volumes and dimensions as well as cardiac hemodynamic parameters should be augmented with regional measures of myocardial structure and contractile function and assessed at early and late time points after transplantation to more comprehensively evaluate the full impact of cardiac stem cell therapies.

Prospects for the future There are important opportunities to develop an efficient preclinical platform dedicated to the evaluation of stem cell-based heart therapies before application in humans. Figure 2 summarizes the key points that would need to be addressed and proposes directions for future investigations based on current evidence. Porcine models of heart failure are particularly useful for evaluation of novel therapies since they recapitulate clinical presentations of both acute and chronic cardiovascular conditions. Pig-specific iPS cells can be generated from differentiated cells taken in newborns and then reprogrammed to cardiomyocytes. Autologous transplants to pig models of heart failure provide a critical path to clinical application. For example, the evaluation of the iPS-based heart therapy can then be conducted in a model of myocardial ischemia performed on the adult animal from which cells were originally harvested. Alternatively, the creation of a genotyped donor iPS cells library would allow the selection of matched-histocompatible iPS cells to the recipients. In the reprogramming process, in vitro cultures can be engineered to express reporter systems such as the NIS symporter or the HSV-tk system [55], thus enabling longitudinal non-invasive molecular imaging to assess the fate and engraftment rate and fate of administered cells in addition to their impact on cardiac function and remodeling. Conduction velocity studies would help to assess the electromechanical integration of these cells. Further investigations are obviously needed to validate this approach and define the optimal stage cell development, optimal delivery route and time of delivery.

Conclusion The remarkable proliferative and differentiation capacity of stem cells promises an unlimited supply of specific cell types including viable functioning cardiac cells. ESC/iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes represent a suitable cell source that may play a major role in regenerative therapy in the future. However, ES/iPS cell technology has several key issues that remain to be overcome, including the low efficiency of cardiac myocyte differentiation from pluripotent stem cells, the low retention and survival rate of cells when injected or infused into the myocardium, and the possibility of tumor formation in vivo.

Drug Discovery Today: Disease Models | Induced pluripotent stem cells

Solving these issues in suitable large-animal preclinical models will be essential for successfully translating ESC/iPSC technology to improve the health of millions of human patients suffering from heart disease.

References 1 Schenke-Layland, K. et al. (2008) Reprogrammed mouse fibroblasts differentiate into cells of the cardiovascular and hematopoietic lineages. Stem Cells 26, 1537–1546 2 Narazaki, G. et al. (2008) Directed and systematic differentiation of cardiovascular cells from mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Circulation 118, 498–506 3 Zhang, J. et al. (2009) Functional cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Circ. Res. 104, e30–e41 4 Thomson, J.A. et al. (1998) Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282, 1145–1147 5 Takahashi, K. et al. (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861–872 6 Grskovic, M. et al. (2011) Induced pluripotent stem cells – opportunities for disease modelling and drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10, 915–929 7 Taylor, D.A. (2001) Cellular cardiomyoplasty with autologous skeletal myoblasts for ischemic heart disease and heart failure. Curr. Control Trials Cardiovasc. Med. 2, 208–210 8 Dunbar, C.E. et al. (1995) Retrovirally marked CD34-enriched peripheral blood and bone marrow cells contribute to long-term engraftment after autologous transplantation. Blood 85, 3048–3057 9 Schuleri, K.H. et al. (2009) Autologous mesenchymal stem cells produce reverse remodelling in chronic ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Eur. Heart J. 30, 2722–2732 10 Nguyen, B.K. et al. (2010) Improved function and myocardial repair of infarcted heart by intracoronary injection of mesenchymal stem cellderived growth factors. J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res. 3, 547–558 11 Gnecchi, M. et al. (2008) Paracrine mechanisms in adult stem cell signaling and therapy. Circ. Res. 103, 1204–1219 12 Kehat, I. et al. (2004) Electromechanical integration of cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 1282– 1289 13 Xue, T. et al. (2005) Functional integration of electrically active cardiac derivatives from genetically engineered human embryonic stem cells with quiescent recipient ventricular cardiomyocytes: insights into the development of cell-based pacemakers. Circulation 111, 11–20 14 Laflamme, M.A. et al. (2005) Formation of human myocardium in the rat heart from human embryonic stem cells. Am. J. Pathol. 167, 663–671 15 Caspi, O. et al. (2007) Transplantation of human embryonic stem cellderived cardiomyocytes improves myocardial performance in infarcted rat hearts. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 50, 1884–1893 16 Kolossov, E. et al. (2006) Engraftment of engineered ES cell-derived cardiomyocytes but not BM cells restores contractile function to the infarcted myocardium. J. Exp. Med. 203, 2315–2327 17 van Laake, L.W. et al. (2007) Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes survive and mature in the mouse heart and transiently improve function after myocardial infarction. Stem Cell Res. 1, 9–24 18 Dai, W. et al. (2007) Survival and maturation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes in rat hearts. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 43, 504–516 19 Laflamme, M.A. et al. (2007) Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells in pro-survival factors enhance function of infarcted rat hearts. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 1015–1024 20 Berry, M.F. et al. (2006) Mesenchymal stem cell injection after myocardial infarction improves myocardial compliance. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 290, H2196–H2203 21 van Laake, L.W. et al. (2008) Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes and cardiac repair in rodents. Circ. Res. 102, 1008–1010 22 Blin, G. et al. (2010) A purified population of multipotent cardiovascular progenitors derived from primate pluripotent stem cells engrafts in postmyocardial infarcted nonhuman primates. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 1125–1139 www.drugdiscoverytoday.com

e235

Drug Discovery Today: Disease Models | Induced pluripotent stem cells

23

24 25 26

27 28

29

30 31 32 33

34

35 36 37 38 39

Ishikawa, K. et al. (2011) Development of a preclinical model of ischemic cardiomyopathy in swine. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 301, H530–H537 Ruan, W. et al. (2011) A novel strategy to derive iPS cells from porcine fibroblasts. Sci. China Life Sci. 54, 553–559 Piot, C. et al. (2008) Effect of cyclosporine on reperfusion injury in acute myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 359, 473–481 Kehat, I. et al. (2002) High-resolution electrophysiological assessment of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: a novel in vitro model for the study of conduction. Circ. Res. 91, 659–661 Xu, C. et al. (2002) Characterization and enrichment of cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells. Circ. Res. 91, 501–508 Huber, I. et al. (2007) Identification and selection of cardiomyocytes during human embryonic stem cell differentiation. FASEB J. 21, 2551–2563 Ng, S.Y. et al. (2010) Differential gene expressions in atrial and ventricular myocytes: insights into the road of applying embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes for future therapies. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 299, C1234–C1249 Hattori, F. et al. (2010) Nongenetic method for purifying stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Nat. Methods 7, 61–66 Yang, L. et al. (2008) Human cardiovascular progenitor cells develop from a KDR+ embryonic-stem-cell-derived population. Nature 453, 524–528 Draper, J.S. et al. (2002) Surface antigens of human embryonic stem cells: changes upon differentiation in culture. J. Anat. 200 (Pt 3), 249–258 Drukker, M. (2008) Recent advancements towards the derivation of immune-compatible patient-specific human embryonic stem cell lines. Semin. Immunol. 20, 123–129 Drukker, M. et al. (2002) Characterization of the expression of MHC proteins in human embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 9864–9869 Drukker, M. and Benvenisty, N. (2004) The immunogenicity of human embryonic stem-derived cells. Trends Biotechnol. 22, 136–141 Kim, K. et al. (2007) Histocompatible embryonic stem cells by parthenogenesis. Science 315, 482–486 Revazova, E.S. et al. (2008) HLA homozygous stem cell lines derived from human parthenogenetic blastocysts. Cloning Stem Cells 10, 11–24 Zhao, T. et al. (2011) Immunogenicity of induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 474, 212–215 Gore, A. et al. (2011) Somatic coding mutations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 471, 63–67

e236

www.drugdiscoverytoday.com

Vol. 9, No. 4 2012

40

41

42 43 44

45

46 47 48

49

50

51 52 53

54

55

Stadtfeld, M. et al. (2010) Aberrant silencing of imprinted genes on chromosome 12qF1 in mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 465, 175–181 Borowiak, M. et al. (2009) Small molecules efficiently direct endodermal differentiation of mouse and human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 4, 348–358 Chen, S. et al. (2009) A small molecule that directs differentiation of human ESCs into the pancreatic lineage. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 258–265 Takahashi, T. et al. (2003) Ascorbic acid enhances differentiation of embryonic stem cells into cardiac myocytes. Circulation 107, 1912–1916 Kattman, S.J. et al. (2011) Stage-specific optimization of activin/nodal and BMP signaling promotes cardiac differentiation of mouse and human pluripotent stem cell lines. Cell Stem Cell 8, 228–240 Burridge, P.W. et al. (2011) A universal system for highly efficient cardiac differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells that eliminates interline variability. PLoS One 6, e18293 Qiao, H. et al. (2009) Death and proliferation time course of stem cells transplanted in the myocardium. Mol. Imaging Biol. 11, 408–414 Zhang, M. et al. (2001) Cardiomyocyte grafting for cardiac repair: graft cell death and anti-death strategies. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 33, 907–921 Bel, A. et al. (2010) Composite cell sheets: a further step toward safe and effective myocardial regeneration by cardiac progenitors derived from embryonic stem cells. Circulation 122 (Suppl.), S118–S123 Chen, Q.Z. et al. (2010) An elastomeric patch derived from poly(glycerol sebacate) for delivery of embryonic stem cells to the heart. Biomaterials 31, 3885–3893 Ladage, D. et al. (2011) Delivery of gelfoam-enabled cells and vectors into the pericardial space using a percutaneous approach in a porcine model. Gene Ther. 18, 979–985 Schaaf, S. et al. (2011) Human engineered heart tissue as a versatile tool in basic research and preclinical toxicology. PLoS One 6, e26397 Tulloch, N.L. et al. (2011) Growth of engineered human myocardium with mechanical loading and vascular coculture. Circ. Res. 109, 47–59 Campan, M. et al. (2011) Ferritin as a reporter gene for in vivo tracking of stem cells by 1.5-T cardiac MRI in a rat model of myocardial infarction. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 300, H2238–H2250 Mauritz, C. et al. (2011) Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived Flk-1 progenitor cells engraft, differentiate, and improve heart function in a mouse model of acute myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J. 32, 2634–2641 Zhang, W.Y. et al. (2011) Imaging cardiac stem cell therapy: translations to human clinical studies. J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res. 4, 514–522