VO~IIIIIC93. nuinbrr 6
Resonance
Ram
CHCXIICAL
specrroseopy
n (RR) k
has
PHYSICS
where
been a
for the study of Eround- and tacttedslate porentml surfxe properws and dynarmcs. The posittons of the fupdamentals. overtones, and comblnation lines m a RR spectrum orovide mformatlon on the ground-state vlbrattonal force constants and anflarnlonwties [ 1,1] Properly m:erpreted, the mtenaversatrle tooi
ttcs of a RR spectrum yteld rnfo~atton on the es. cited-state potentral surraces and dynamics m the wtnily of the ground-slalc g~omelry [3-61. The he dependent fornuh for Lhe Ramman scatter.
mg amplitude [7-91 provrdes a useful prcture of how
vartous final vibrattond states, of the ground electronic
state, can act as probes of the excited (electromc)
k#Jp= i”gelX/)
,
NJ,)= P,,lX,) ,
I@,(r))= cxp(-tff,r/tl)l@,)
,
3, = wI + E,/it .
In this fornlul~~~e IS the electronic transrtion mow ment between the ground(g) and exerted (e) potential surfaces, ff, IS the excited-state hamlltonian and &, 1s tie elgenvalue of the imtml vibratIonal state. The phenomenological hfetime r” IS introduced to descnbe the “‘extramolecular” degrees of freedom [9], i e the interaction of the molecuie with its sur-
roundrn~. In eq. (1) the overlap between the evolved rrutld state, lb,(t)>, and the final state, I+ ISclearly a probe of the dynamrcs of I@,(r)).This use of I#+, or aI,, was made more explicit in ref [9], where tt was
state dynamics The time dependent formula for the Raman scattenng amplitude from an uutial state Ix,). 10 a fillill stntc IXJ IS
24/31 Dccenlbcr 1982
LETTERS
[71’
shown that
(I) *Work Supported In part by 1 NT bra% *Currentaddress Theoretical ~VI. . I. LANL. NIX hlc\~co, USA. ** Camlllc and tlcndry
586
Dregf~ls
LOS Alamos.
Tcachcr-Scholar . 0 ~9-2614~82~~OO-O~O~S
02.75 0 1982 ~or~-Ho~~d
The quantity
IG##(r)$
LS the probability
III the slate I@$, thusPJjli)
I@,(r))
trme averaged probabdity. avahble
IS
P,(/lr)
of finding
the exponentdy
IS euperunentally
by integratmg over the Raman enhancement
spectrum,
knowledge
vides useful mformatron
ofPI.
or ~+#r~I~,(r))12pro-
about
I@,(f)) only to the ex-
tent that IQ/’ IS well understood, corresponds
wavefunctlons
If I$/‘, IS poorly
coupled, anharmoruc
strongly
characterized
vrbrational
(e.g a
state) and
.I set of pbys~~lly rnterestmg 7ero-order states (on the then the subsequent decay of the correfunctron,
(RI/Z(I)),
of the zero-order We propose
state
[ lo,1 I] ‘, rlrcr~ rlrc Rarrrorr dynamics irr rlrc grortrld
elcctrorlic state. Eqs (I) and (7) refer to a pamcular
dynamtcs. IR) may bc produced by rcso-
Simple wavcfunctions
nancc WIIII cerlam bound&ah? vlbrshonal lcvcls of
the upper potc1111a1, see cq (3c), or from dlrccrly excncd
level of the first cxcrtcd allowed
derrved formula
transform
by exammmg
for the fir/f Raman spec-
ct al.
waiting
ground-srarc
dynrmrcs
the ground vibratronl
smglc? state IS populated
to spontaneously
Alicr
state.
[ 141 dlustrdtes the
of a simple p> m probing
In a scrtes of alkylbenzenes
state
cast
m eq. (3~) to
a s~nglc vrbratronal
The work of tlophms utthty
In the former
wrdth must be small enough
to allow the half-Fourier select predommantly
IS a probe of the ground-state a recently
states
lint
final state, I&, and a partrcular emission frequency, os = w, + (E, - Er>/“. We can euplrculy see that Raman rattermg dynamics
Raman wavcfunc-
trons IfZ). are tdcal to probe ground-state
the phenomcnologrcal
surface vrbrattonal
flow out
of such a &cay
that systems WIIII well-characterrzed
I@,(r)), whtch grve rise to “simple”
todissocratton
scartcnrrg becomes a probe/or
amplitude
will be present m the Raman spectrum
photodrssocratmg
ekcrtcd
indicates
states The signature
lb,(r)) is unknown, then little may be learned about either Id/) or l@,(t)) from the Raman scattermg. However, if I@,(r)) IS well characterized, as in a direct phoor resonance to a low-lymg,
]R) propagated
lower surface),
such as when I$,-)
nearly harmonic oscillator
to low-lymg.
tion mvolving the Raman wdvcfunctton
on the ground potential surface. II’ Ifi) IS cvpdndcd tn
lation
BSseen rn eq (2b).
Naturally.
24/3 I Drccmbcr I981
CHI-LtICAL PHYSICS LCTTCRS
Volume 93. number 6
and
emtt to the ground electronic
40-50
ps the sample IS photo-
totized and the photon ion signal IS monttorcd as a runctron of laser frequency Tlus techmquc measures
trum [9]
tile
relative popular~ons of groundmre vlbrrnonal AT after thctr mttlal preparation. A
levels at 3 time comparrson
J
X
exp[r(wf
- wS + E,/tl)l]
U?IR(r))
dl
, (3a)
erg
--m
m the ground
state during
Pgc163 .
WJ
eup[l( w, + E,/tr)f - rt] I&(r)) ,
(3c)
0
=
exp(-IH,t/A)lR)
.
(3‘0
whtch IS closely related IO others dewed [ 12,13], shows that the Raman spectrum IS gtven by an autocorrelatlon func-
Tha fomlula,
for Raman processes in solids
* J.L RI,ISC~.nd one of US (EJH) havehad rvcrnl d~usSIO~Sabout the use of Raman scatterm as a probe for wound (cl~c~romic) state dynnmrcs.
cn-
states
by resonance
IO a smgJe IowJying vrbrattonal level tn the excited. s~atc manifold. This resonance condrtron IS most easily satisfied
by molecules
Condon drsplaccments,
It drfficult
and
spec-
tune AT
ansmg from bound
arc most useful when they are obtamed
163 = J
B(r))
transfer
Raman wavefunctrons
where IR) =
of these spectra to the lluoresccncc
tra [ 151 provides a measure of the mtramolccular
w~lh
small Frdnck-
but small dtsplacements
to obtam detectable
mtcnsrty
vrbrational
levels of the ground state
amplrtude
to these h&lymg
be Increased by strmulated gested by Depristo
make
m the l11gb
The scattering
levels may. however. resonance Rainan as sug-
et al. [ I1 1. Such experiments
have been performed by Koffend et al. [IO] on I2 w~tb an optically pumped 1, laser. In this cast states as hrgh as u” = 96 were populated by stimulated emrssion from the Bo; excited state. Scattermg
amplitude
can also be obtamed
m high-
lying vibrational
levels when the excited electronic state is dissochttve Consider, for example, tl~e recent 587
Volu~w 93 number 6
CIIEMICAL
c~pcnmcnts of Imre ct al. [ 16j on ozone
Raman scattenng
(1111that products
high-lymg
of thssoclation.
vrbrauonal
Thus scattcrmg
but before comple tral dlstnbutmn
dissociation,
of the emltted
brahon III
IS due to the few molethus retummg hot
l&t
LSa tell-tale
a symmetric
clue
Ozone does not
dynamics.
is not
“predlssoclatton”
occurs durmg the dlssocratlon.
the absorption
to the
The spec-
I+,(r)) since the dluoc;ntlon
direct.
band
500 cm-l
artcr the UV absorption,
lo excited. and ground-state completely
states wlthm
surface vtbratlonally
have the simplest
point
out of the UV Hartley
cults which emit a photon ground potential
They
VI-
The structure
truss sectlon [ 17) Indicates that at
least some of the rrduck-Condon
wave packet
I@,(t)> remdms m the Franck-Condon few vlbrptronal periods [ IS].
regton for a
Perhaps the sunplcst possible Raman WavefunctIon involvmg large displacements would be produced m I dtrect bond dissociation Although
of a locahzed chromophore.
cq. (3~) contnms long-tinie
uill typvally
dynamics
be quite small), the transttlon
frag.
oi the Raman wavcfunction KR spectrum
ckclted state may be Illustrated
II?)
=yo = -2.0.
= l/2 (-r -.Yo)3_ + I/? Q -y#
surFace has
(1’ -yo)
t_v) + 3,.0(x -JI)’
WIII constder the three tralcctortes
plotted along wnh lh(! evcitedstalecilnlours in fig. 1, These three trqectories dose out of three dlstmct choices forxO and _I’,, m I’,&._v) All Raman wavcfunctlons were calcu(FCA)
gausstans. The
is reflected
is
m the RR
spot”
preparation
expected
m
a rhrect dissociation. B has the imtlal conditlons.ro
Trajectory We
The Raman wavefunction
bond stretch rn~t~al condmon,Thiscor-
)po = -7.0,
and the excited potenttal
[ 191, with 8 to I6 two-dunenslonal
- u&
spectrum, see fig 2b Tha spectrum may be analyzed m terms of fundamentals and overtones of a local
mode s&e
lated usmg the frozen gausslan approxtmatlon
- 0 Il(r
quite sunplr and tlus sunplicity
responds to the “hot
the rorm Y,(.r,_v)
= -~.O(X
dltionsx
by a model two-dtmen-
The ground potential
surface 19 V&J?)
+ l/2 @’ -yo+
for a photodlsscaatmg
s~onal calculatton.
- 0 I I(x --_~,,)~c~* -.I’~)
= l/2 dr - rI#
moment
ments separate. Consequently, if?) = P,, I&) wtll contam only the slmplc, early tmle dynamics. The sunphcny
I n: I. Contour plot of IIIC c\cltcd potential surface, V&.y) = -2 0~ --)‘I + z 0t.x +J )?. nlc II~~EC traJ~c~orlrsshoan ,IIISC front 1r.mL.k-Condon tmnwlons lor three distmct cholcca OTXI, and) ,, I” the paand-state potcnhd V&c y)
(r
fipl: m eq. (3b) will vamsh as the chromophorc
and the resultmg
24/31 December 1982
PHYSICS LCl-fCKS
and undergoes a small amphtude
in the (x -JJ) coordtnate
on
= - 1.0, osclllatlon
way out the exit chan-
IIS
nel. The effect of tlus oscLla?lon can be seen in the square plotted
of IR) shown
IS
in fig. 3a. The RR spectrum
3b, and It mny
m fig.
still
be analyzed
terms of a local mode mitral condition.
The broaden-
ing of the local mode peaks in the spectrum the decay of amphtude
out of the zero-order
mode states into the remaining
in
is due to local
modes. All of the RR
results are quite .Iccurate for this potential smce the wavy: packet quickly evolves away from the FrwckCondon region. The RR spectra were then calculated
spectra wdl have sharp hnes for the first four vibrational spacings since there are only a few states that
by ekpandmg
low
IR) m terms of the numerical
ground-
which were obtamed by diaganalizallon m a complex gaussian basis set [20] aThe state elgcnfunctions
spectra as well as WR)are calculated tional umts below the absorption r= 0.17-5, see eq. (3~).
with w, two vlbramaxunum
588
A, ia direct
bssocistion
with
the init&
the (-r -u)
C has a large amphtude coordinate
to encounter
whch
several “sharp”
oscillation
m
allows the wave packet (x -u)
turning
pomts
and to have one shght recurrence. The square of W wffl show the turmng points as regtons of increased
and
Fig. ?a shows the square of II?) which results from traJectory
in the ground-statemanifold, Trajectoty
con-
amplitude
and the recurrence
to IR), see fig.
will also add structure
4a. Asexpectedthe RR spectrum
Volume
93, number
CHEMICAL
6
PHYSICS
24/31
LI-I-TIIRS
Dcrcntbrr
1982
300
(b) 0
3 RELATI \‘E
IO
I5
SCATTERED
20
25
30
i~Cl,Sll \‘I: SCSI”I’URCDFRCQUCNC\
FRCQLIEKY
the photon and we have spectral evldcnce of the dccay of these local modes, i.c band widths of ~hc
overtones Thcrc are llmitatlons on quantrfylng the dynamrcs and the mechanrsm for the decay smce the exact form of lrans~tlon moment and vlbratronl w~er~nctlons
shownin fig.4b hasbecomemorecomplicatedsmce w) ISno longer a stmple local mode tnltial state. Using
Raman scattenng
chromophore,
from a photodIssocIating
or “dlssoclaphore”,
to produce
a local
OF hot spot is in many ways analogous to one photon overtone spectroscopy on a C-H local mode 111 J_ In the C-H local mode case, we have a good intuitive guess of the excitation produced by
excitation
are unknown.
Consequently,
the
preciseformof Ihe spectroscoputllyproducedRIP
teal state I$,) is unknown, There arc several arguments
in
the
Ltcralurc about the meaning of
bandwIdths,
srde bands, etc. whrch can be traced to the questIon:
arethe spectral
features a result of the assumed form of I#,) or the sub~quent dynamics of I##))? (The spectrum IS the Founer transform of @#(I)).) The matn psinl of thispaper IS that LheRanran589
34/3
CIICSIICAL PilYSlCS LLTTCRS
VO~IIIIIC93 nuinbcr 6
dissoctaphorc
where
Dcccnibcr 1982
will greatly extend the num-
techntque
ber of systems
I
local excitation
can be pro-
duced. Such systems wdl provide an intmtrve, bLt not precise. tdea of the form of the spectroscopically produced initial state, in thts case IR). Just as HI C-H local mode spectroscopy, ambiguities may stall exist about features bemg due to tR) or the dynamtcs uqr)). Some light can be shed on tha problem
of
m any par-
trcular case by examining the Raman scattering Just off resonance. When off resonance, the lntensltles of the fundamentals
and overtones
normal modes contam the upper potential totally
symmetrtc
of the ground-state
mformatron
about the slope of
of the modes and changes n force consurface m the dtrectton
tants of non-totally
modes [9]. These
symmetric
upper surf.rce parameters play a large role in shapmg lR) as we have seen in ases A, B and C. Indeed, the abthty
to tune over the absorption
profiie
socuumg state IS o mezms of changing
we effectrvely
trollable
way. By detunmg,
hfetmre
m the exerted state, If?) to be locnhzed
function
Condon
region
forcing
the effect
the
shorten
the Raman
around
and the drrectron
FIN. 4c dlustrates
for the dtsin a con-
Rj
wave-
the Franck-
of steepest
of detuning
descent.
from
reso-
nance on the RR spectrum for case C. The optron of changmg the inrtral state by tunmg the Incident fre,())
0
-I
IO
lii:~. \‘I’1 \‘E
1
quency
A \‘I”I’CI?I:D
I’Rl~Q~‘ESC\
IS not available
eupenmcnts Concrete
examples of dissociaphore
mclude methyl
Ij
overtone
to the one photon
spectroscopy
Iodide, ethyl iodtde, etc., whtch all
absorb near 260 nm m a continuous
broad
band of
As the alkane cham gets longer, the “hot spot” becomes increasmgly isolated from tire rest of the molecule. The first member, CH,I, has already frequenctes
been investigated
tcally [22,23] mant
by phorodisrocidotl,
and experrmentally
force
in the excited
photodissociation
state,
cross sections
ttonal states of the methyle C-l (C)
15 ORCI.,\;‘I \‘C IOSC~\‘I”I’ERED
20
23
F’RCQUENC’r
;
both theoret-
[24,25]. as inferred mto
fragment,
The domfrom
the fiial
the
vtbra-
is along the
bond, with less force along the CH3 umbrella
coordtnate strcching
and even smaller force along the at C-H coordmate.
Eventually,
by exammmg
the off resonance
Raman. the resonance Raman, and the photodssoctatron at many should
tncident
emerge
Meanwhde,
frequencres,
of ground
a coherent
picture
and excited
state dynamss.
for the larger alhylhalides,
the dephasmg
Voluux 93, number 6
CHfXlCAL
and decay of the hot spot produced VIBRaman scattering should remam an interestmg problem.
PHYSlCS LLTTCKS 1121 J.D. Page and D L. Tanks, J Chcm
Plrys 75 (1981)
5694 [ 131 Y H~lfny~ko~ 755.
Sbt
and I Tctmr,
P&s
Soi. 21 f 1967)
[ 141J 6. tloph~ns.P K R. La~gnd&&n~~l~ auf R C Smalley, J. Chcm Phys , subnuttcd ior pubhcstfon.
References
IfSI
111 G Hetzbcrg, MoIc~uhr spectra .md molecuk~r structure, Voi. 1 Spectraofdtatomlc molecules, 2nd Cd. (Van Noslnnd, Pnnccton. 1950). hlolccular spccrn and molcculrr struclure, Vol. Z Infrared and Ram.m spec~n of poiyatomic molecutcs (Van Nostr.md, princeton, 1945) [I j Sf.MtngaxiiandW. Siebrand. J Chrm. Phys 62 (1975) 1074
131A C. Albrccbt tid h1.C.IluIlcy.
J. Chcm. Phys 55
(1971)4438. (41 DC. BICIZCJ and W.L Pct~cohs, Proc NJ& Acad Ser. USA 74 (1977) 2639. [S\ A Warshel and P. Dauber, J Chcm Phys 66 (1977) 5477 161 A B hlwrs. R A. hlafhlcs, D J. Tannor ,tnd L J Ilcllcr, J Chem Phys. (1982). to tc publahcd. 171 S.-Y. Lee and C.J. He&x, J Chcm Phys 71 (1979) 4777. 181 EJ Hellcr. m Poten~l cncrgy surfaccs and dynanucs calculrtlons, cd. D. Truhlar (Plenum Press, New Yorh,
1981) 191 t.3. Heller, R L. Sundhrg and D J Tannor, J. Phys Chem 86 (1982) 1812. [lOI J B lioffcnd. R. llacfsand R.W. IMd, m Procccdmg of lhc lnternat~onol Conference on Lasers (1978) pp 240-251. f II
J AL ~Pr~s~a,N. Rabtrr dnd R.R.nlties, 73 (1980)4798
J.
Cficm Phys
J-B ifapkmr. D C Powxs S Mubmtcl And R r. Snuaey, I Chrm. PfiY.5 72 (1980) so49 If61 DC fmrc. J L Kmscy. R IV I reld and D.II K.I~J~JXIIJ. preprint [ 171 P J Hay. R T Pah. K.U Walhicr and I. J Ilcllur. J Phys Chcm 16 f 1981) 862 [ISI CJ ffcflet, J.Chan Phys 68 (1978) 3891,ALcounts Chcm Res. 14 (1981) 368. 119) I; J ticllcr, J Chcm. Phys 75 (1981 b 1923. [lol [zlj
hl J. DAIS and L: J Hellcr. J Chem. I’hys 7 I (1979) 3383. B.R. Hcnr~,~cC~UntsC~lem WS 10 (1977) IX?. hl L Sage and J Jorfncr. Adwn Clwn Plays 47 11981) 293, R C. Urap and h1.J. Berry. J Chem. Ph)r. 71 (1979) 4940, J N. Perry md A.11 Zcwd, J. Chem Phys. 70 (1979)
582 1221 hl. Shpro
,fnd R. Ocrsohn, J.Chcm.
Phys. 73 (1980)
3810 1331 S-Y Lce~ndCJ.ficlfcr..l Chcm Phys 76f1982) 3035 1741 S L Uauytcum and S K Leone. J Chcm. Phys. 71. (1980)6531 1251 R K Sparks. K ShobatJhc. L K. C&on and Y T Leu. J Chcm Phps 75 t1981) 383s