__ El3
_!Sg 2
A
journal 01 magnetism
IH A
t&etic materials
__
2
ELSE\ IER
Letter to the Editor
Preparation
and magnetic properties of Fe,,:,,:,_,Ni ,-SiO, alloy solid using a sol-gel method
Nei-Fai
Gao. Yuan-Yuan
granular -
Liu
Abstract The preparation means oi S-ra) 3110) parttck
of Fe ,,“.,_,
dlfiractron dtspcrwd
in Fe-50..
are confwmcd h) ths rewlt thr: FetiiNi,-,-SIOI wperparamapnctrim.
Nanocomposite
studied
esterGel)
NI ,-SIO: 1.1= 0. 20. hl:L ?W)granular wltd urine 3 sol-gel method
and kctron
transmksron Fc,,NI,,-SIO,
oi the .
and F~y,,Nli,-,-SiO, single-domain
mIcrograph\.
and Fe::,,Nr,,,-SiO,
and the hltissbaucr granular
SolId during
and multldomrlin
materials
have
because
of their
recentI! potential
txen us?
itc material consisting of ultrafine m
wlid with imestigated
a 4nglc more in
the past. Recently. tht fabricatton and phlsiccll properties of the granular alloy solid has rewiled more attention bccauw alloys hair: almost rlh\a)s prwrn IO lx more useful and tnterssttng than their pure metallic c’otwttuents [l-h]. Espe-
spectrums. Awing
granulnr
IS
tmcrtlpated
and Fe,,Ni,,,
SolId hate been tahricated rrhlch
The e\oIutron oi the magnetI< propertIes tire decrrhed
b!
ultraiine for
In detail and ?\plaincd b\ uclng
thcon.
in technolom. such as high densin magnetic recording medium. ferrollutds. catalysts and so on. Granular metal soltd is a type of nanocompos-
proprrttss elemental
Pure Fe metal. Fc..,Nl,,,
ciall!, for Fe, _, Ni, alloy. the imar .W? nickel and the order-disorder
problem for transforma-
tion for FeNi? [7.X] are \trlI-kknwn. However the method of granular alloy solid IS mainly cosputwing and mechanical ball mising. Among the karict?; of means to prepare nanocompostte mat+ rtal. a sol-gel method effectike and economical
has already proken ~a! of fabrication
an [9-
II]. bum studies on the preparation and magtwtic proptzrticc oi granular alloy solid are farer In this paper. we ha\e wccrl~sfull~ prepared Fe !,,,,_, Ni , -SiO, granular allo! solid using ;1 WIgel method. uhich has been car
.:
‘... .-y’.
A
c
:.::
.
..:rj -q\.
.
,yr ..L
.
._.-. ;.. .. ..
:;
:;
‘...
‘f’
.
..-. .._
.
. \
:
i 1 ~~~~~~ .
-12
-8
-4 Velocity
The magnetic propertiss oi th< Fe,,,,,_, SIO, granular solid here ;lre imrstigatrd. sarurcrlion
magnetization
aI room
remperature
NI
,-
Ths of
grnnular solid F~,,_,NI,,,- SiO, and Fe:,,-,Ni.,,-50, ierrus redwing rrlmperature I T, b is shwn in Fig. 5. The magnrltization oi rhee samples incwaw
with the increase oi T<. The degrsc oi rhls incrcse ior the Fe,,-,NI,,,,-SiO. %:rrnple\ is larger than rhat ior the Fe,,,Ni,,,,-SIO, sampler;. The srlluration magnstlzarion ot the allo! partic’le in the F?,,,NI, ,,.,-SiO. snd Fc,,,NI.,,-SiOprdnulur solid reaches 13.3 and 105 emu g r
;1re \tl~ near to the values ol’ hulli Fe,,,Ni,,, Fe,,,Nl.,, allo) \rhich are 1-l: and 3h emu g respectwctl! .[13]. Her? the orrginol allo! particles
and
conwnrr~rion 1W (k\\cighrr in grsnulsr solid is used to calculate rhc allo) mapnetlzation In fact. the real allo) wncentra[ion in the granular solid 15 ken near to the orlplnal one It is knwn thvr [he a\erape six oi Ihe allo> particles Increysc< \trth the increase of the redwIng tempercrrurr: and [hers IS a irids rungs of kc‘ distribution c-ri the allo! parrlcles irom the TEhl mvxopraphs nt’ these granular 3llo! solid samples So. the proportron ol the sup
.
G
-1 pn
z;ltron of rhese Fe,,,-,_, Ni,-SIO, solid sample \rlth thr: Incrrttise tcmpersture.
8
12
‘5)
granular allo! of the reducing
FsNi
410~ particles
of the
is
or&r
oi a couple
oi
tens of nm. the precise value depending on the shape oi the particle [ 141. This sInpIe-domain configuration causes ultrafine allo! particle5 lo exhibit much larger magnetic c’oercnlties rhan
that oi bulk allo). The decrease of ihe c‘oerciviI> ior rhe granular alloy solid samples rcduwd at 7, c SOWC ma! lx caused b! the increase oi rhe
proportion oi the superpsramagnetic allo) particles in the granular solid \\hich she\\ the superparamagnetlc rela\atlon and hai< The decrease oi the coer
zero cocrcn 111 for the granu-
lar
at
[I-I].
alloy
solid
reduced
about
T,
”
W(r’C ma)’ lx caused b> the increase of rhe proportion of the all01 partlcle‘i \\rlth multido-
“400
450
500
550
TEMPERATURE FIN. 6. Ctwra\In lure
tar
rhc
\s. rrducing Fe,,,Nl,,,-SO.
700
SiO,
FCI
Iempcr3turc and
650
600
main which ma! cause the soft magnetic properties with smaller coercivitp. In conclusion. in this \\ork. Fe-SIO, granular metal solid and Fe,,,Ni,,-SiO, and Fe,,-,Ni,,-,-
81 room Iempcre.
Fe:,:,Nl.,, -WI!
franulsr
solid samples
granular
alloy
solid
in \rhiih
iron metal
and
Fc,,,Ni,,-, and Fe:,,Ni.,, allo) partlclcs are dispersed in the SIO, ma.trl\ hats heen successiull> fabricated using a sol-gel method. The magnstizatlon and the coercikio of the granular allo! solid vs. the reducing temperature are inwsti-
The coercivib at room tempsrarure of the Fs,,jNi,,-Si02 and Fe2,:,Ni5,:,-SiOT granular solid versus the reducing temperature IS shown in Fig. h. The coerci\Itp of the Fe,,:,Ni,,,,-SiOgranular solid samples is about two times-high& than that of the Fe.,,Ni,,,-SiOgranular solid samples. This may he caused by the higher magnerir anisorrop) constant of Fe,,:,Ni,,?-, ‘GO, than that of Fe,,,Ni.,, -SiO, because the magnsrocrystalline constant is near zero and the magnelostriciion is \en small for F:,!Ni,,, allo) comparing with F~,,:,NI,,:, allo). The coer&lry varied with the reducing temperalure (7,) for both rhe Fe,,,Ni,,-SiOand Fe2,,Nib,:,-SiO: granular solid samples and-sho\\s a ma_timum Lalue at about T, = 5OO’C although iI is not wn obvious for the Fe,,,Ni,,,-SiO, granular solid samples. This is because the proportion of the thermal slahle single-domain allo) parriclss is highest for the Fe.,Ni,,,,-SI07 and Fc,,,Nl.,,SiO, granular solid samples riduced at about T( = WWC. II is well knonn that the critical size for [he formation
ofa
single
magnctlc
domain
in
gated. Supsrparsmagnetism. single-domain and mullidomain thcop are used 10 csplaln ihs experimentul results.
References II]
B .\bzl
in. ~pphcd 4nd
SOII~
Dc\~ce
Prcsi. NCH j’orb.
l’1Xl
p
.\d\~n
SI~IC Scwnie
Research.
cd. R \\olfe
in
I.\cdcmlc
I.
I 1991 I 52n7 I!] 5 Rir). D DAS and D Chakrsort\. J .\ppl Phrs T4 I lW?lJ7Jh. (41.A Ciarln 3nd C L Chrcn. J Appl Ph>i ir7 I 139111935 l:j
C.L
(51 J H
Chren. J .Appl
Ph\% Ir’,
Hw
Cha-tg. J hlsgn
and C-R
hlsgn
hlal?r.
131
1lYY,?l3J_’
ihl T E Cranshsu. cd\.
B \’
Bhargatd
m .\d~ani~~
Thwa. IElsekwr
P K
in hkwbsuer
L\cngar.
Sacnre.
J.h;
.AmslerJam.
191 R D Shull. J J Rlrlcr.
4 J Shapiro.
end L H Btnnel. I l%wl 1-u
Re
hlaler
k
L
Speirroccop) Srnsl.ea.
SC
lYa?l p 239
I
Suar~zendrubcr
S\mp
Prtw
I??
I p II,me , / , H
L_':=.,, lllll I!II
)ol,rt/,rl ,.,I ,~l,l?~l(H~m dnJ ~hleritl,~
'll~l¢'~l=rl, I ¢_~ ~loCJ41L2~I-L256
14 -% R,,~, :ind R R .... I%l.ii~..r Re- Bull l ~ i l , i ~ - l l Ioll lian.Pin~ %l, an~: Jnd FIe.L,~.- l.u,,. I. I%lal.n l%l,.i~n Mal~'r
[1_ll R M
131 i l,l,i-li
II..I] I S JJ(,)h, Jnd C P B,:~n. m ]k|a~neh~,m III. ,,.'d_;, C. T R,~d,' Jnd H '~uhl ~ . ~ a d e m l c Press. Nov, ~ o r k . It/n31 p 2"3
~,J
[12i C E hqln.,.,n. I~IS Rid,:,ul. I"E CrJn~h<1~ :,nd P E ,%l.,d.c,-, Ph,,~. RL.~ l.ell l~i !'Jr, l l .l~,li
~,~fk.
Bozorlh.
Ferroma~ncl=~.m
i \ an N,~,tr.Jnd.
Nev,
Iw.~ 3 P