Vol. 29, No. 2, 1967
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICALRESEARCH
PREPARATION AND PROPERTIES OF CLOSTRIDIAL Jen-shiang Department
Received
iron
September
A procedure
has previously
and inorganic
or "acid-labile"
isolation
for
the reconstitution
doxin
on Chelex
agent.
the mercurial,
of ionic These
could
if
reconstitution
two alternate
compare
requirements
for
preparations
employ
ferredoxin,
rather
mixture.
(Malkin
reconstitution
components
of these
treatment
with
were
and
incorporated omitted
from
we wish
the
to
of apoferredoxins,
apoferredoxins, from
the iron
sulfide,
any one of the
communication
of ferredoxin
to remove
sodium if
of
reducing
or sulfide
the preparation
of ferre-
the addition
and a mercaptide
other
and
by chromatography
required
In this
for
ferredoxin,
by treatment
was obtained
of the
and the conditions
protein
nor was any iron
properties
than
clostridial
by Fe(SOs)(NHs)nSOs,
or both
acid
the removal
and was purified
sulfide,
methods
the chemical
this
Reconstitution
be supplied
incubation
from
from
inorganic
either
for
was prepared
columns.
was omitted,
the protein
Berkeley
apoferredoxin,
No reconstitution
components
describe
protein,
mersalyl,
iron,
2-mercaptoethanol. three
sulfide
The apoprotein
and Sephadex
a source
of California,
been described
of ferredoxin
1966b).
with
C. Rabinowitz
University
of the resulting
Rabinowitz,
APOFERREDOXINS
26, 1967
the
into
Hong and Jesse
of Biochemistry,
COMMUNICATIONS
and describe
these
proteins.
and inorganic
a mercurial,
sulfide
the These
from
as previously
described. M&?&s modification
and Mater&G--Protein of the phenol
and have been corrected
concentrations
method
so that
as described all
values
246
were
determined
by Lovenberg,
are expressed
by a
et al.
as dry weight
(1963), of
Vol. 29, No. 2, 1967
The radioactivities
protein. were
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICALRESEARCH
determined
with
10 ml of Bray's as described mined
groups
acid
Iron
acid-l-
protein
as previously
by the procedure Apoferredoxin-I:
described
by Malkin
4000-fold
by Lovenberg,
et aZ.
et al.
was perpH 8.5,
excess
by
iodoacetic
NaOH before G-25.
use.
The
The enzymic reaction
(1963). from CZostridiwn
acidi-
(1963).
was prepared (1966b)
used had a
the phosphoroclastic
used was prepared
and Rabinowitz
acid
in 0.1 p1 Tris.HCl,
on Sephadex
The protein
The free
by carboxymethylation
concentrated
of Buchanan,
was deter-
Carboxymethylation
using
ferredoxin
1963).
iodoacetic
was determined
in
bathophenanthroline
determined
with with
Counter
sulfide
et at.,
15 minutes
by chromatography
described
Crystalline urici
for
had been neutralized
of ferredoxins
with
Acid-labile
were
anaerobically
was isolated
activity
(1962).
cpm per umole.
at room temperature
which
I Scintillation
The radioactive
of 63,500
apoferredoxin
Mark
(Lovenberg,
"C.
and "C-apoferredoxins
was determined
of apoferredoxins
activity
treating
Chicago
described
iodoacetic
formed
'$Fe-ferredoxins
by Doeg and Ziegler
sulfhydryl
specific
a Nuclear
solution.
as previously
using
of
COMMUNICATIONS
for
according
to the method
the preparation
of apo-
ferredoxin-(mersalyl-Chelex-Sephadex). Apoferredoxin-II:
Ferredoxin,
pH 7.4,
was made 4% in TCA with
allowed
to stand
throughout bleached
this
HCl,
period
rpm for
The precipitate
peated
1 hour
for
pH 9.0,
and the with
colorless
supernatant
solution
material
supernatant
taken
247
y formic
was
was centrifuged was discarded. acid
The washing
and allowed was re-
up in 4 ml of 0.1 E Tris.
was removed was then
mixture
was completely
suspension
3 ml of 0.023
E Tris.HCl,
of H2S gas was noted
The whi,te
was finally
and the insoluble
This
of ferredoxin
at 0“ C and centrifuged.
The precipitate
The almost
color
period.
was washed
once.
Evolution
and the brown
10 minutes
30 minutes
a 15% TCA solution.
at 0" C.
at the end of this
at 17,000
to stand
for
14 mg, in 11 ml of 0.015
passed
by centrifugation. over
a Sephadex
G-25
Vol. 29, No. 2, 1967
column
(1.2
Tris.HCl,
BIOCHEMICAL
x 38 cm) which pH 8.5,
apoferredoxin
had been previously
and the protein
prepared
in this
as for
respect
to P-mercaptoethanol Reconstitution
II,
330,000
mercaptoethanol tion
mixture
8.5,
and incubated were
3 umoles
were
8 cm) equilibrated water
prior
washed 0.05
to use.
successively M Tris.HCl,
The ferredoxin ing
0.58
with
with
0.05
applying
containing
was finally
Mwith
of 4 ml.
(specific
with
activity
NP gas.
The reac-
The reconstituted
the reaction
mixture,
!j Tris.HCl,
ferre(0.8
and washed
x
with
the column
pH 7.4,
M Tris.HCl,
pH
column
M NaCl to remove 0.005
=
of 2-
0.1 E Tris*HCl,
pH 6.5,
at
At the
and 140 umoles
phosphate,
with
4 hours
M 2-mercapto-
on DEAE-cellulose
0.23
eluted
0.07
volume
deaerated
at 37" C.
10 ml of 0.15
pH 7.4,
was
and 20 ml of excess pH 7.4,
reagents. contain-
M NaCl. of Ferredoxin
ferredoxin
and 3 umoles
was reisolated
ResuZts--The for
are shown in Table
iron,
I.
for
and 0.05
15 minutes
Apoferredoxin-
c 2-mercaptoethanol at 37" C with
of Na2S when present.
in
3 umoles
of
The reconstituted
as above.
analyses
sulfide,
from Apoferredoxin-III: pH 8.5,
of 1.6 ml was incubated
5gFeS04(NHs)2S04
and III
flushing
3 fold
1.8 mg, in 0.1 MTris.HCl,
a volume
still
1 M potassium
After
Reconstitution
III,
the same
NP gas for
8 M urea,
in a final
by chromatography with
The
Apoferredoxin-
of 5gFeS04(NHs)2S04
15 minutes
reisolated
using
were
of Na2S when present,
diluted
for
solutions
pH 8.5,
added while
was then
E
apoferredoxin-II.
by flushing
of antifoam
3 umoles
cpm/umole),
doxins
anaerobically
amount
end of the incubation,
the same buffer.
from Apoferredoxin-II:
in 0.1 M Tris.HCl,
and a small
0.02
(P-MET).
1.8 mg, was incubated
ethanol
with
was prepared
but all
of Ferredoxin
room temperature
with
way is designated
apoferredoxin-II,
COMMUNICATIONS
equilibrated
was eluted
Apoferredoxin-III
Apoferredoxin-III: procedure
AND BIOPHYSICALRESEARCH
of native free
ferredoxin
sulfhydryl
The apoproteins
groups were
248
and apoferredoxins and enzymic
essentially
free
II
activity of iron
and
Vol. 29, No. 2, 1967
Table
I.
BIOCHEMICAL
Properties
of Apoferredoxins
Sample
1. Native
AND BIOPHYSICALRESEARCH
Iron
ferredoxin
COMMUNICATIONS
and Reconstituted
Acidlabile sulfide
Free -SH
Aag0
motes/mote protein
A&l/ ml/cm
6.5
3.94
6.0
0.2al
Ferredoxins
Enzymic activity
Yield
% 100
% --
2 . Apoferredoxin-Iu
0.06
0.00
0.0
0.11
0
75
3. Apoferredoxin-II
0.16
0.01
0.7
0.00
0
67
4. Apoferredoxin-III
0.11
0.01
7.5
0.00
0
70
6.0 6.6 6.4
5.9 6.8 6.0
3.74 2.65 4.02
108 114 119
6. Apoferredoxin-II t S= t Fe'+ t 2-MET@
0.58
0.52
0.00
7
55
7. Apyf;;zdoxin-II + urea + 2-METg/
0.95
0.13
0.00
0
77
8. Apoferredoxin-II t urea t s= f E-METE.
0.05
0.10
0.00
0
75
5.8 6.8 5.8 6.2
5.8 7.1 5.1 5.6
3.24 3.27 3.94 4.25
108 106
72
2.1
0.1
0.49
3
79
0.00
0.26
0.00
3
86
5. Apoferredoxin-II + urea + S= + Fe++ t 2-MET
9. Apoferredoxin-III + Fe"
t S=
+ 2-MET
10. Apoferredoxin-III t Fe* + Z-MET"-/ 11. Apoferredoxin-III + P-MET
70 75 89c-/
:: 8sC/
1;:
t S=
Q/ Previously
described
(Lovenberg,
et ail.,
1963).
!?I Apoferredoxin-I contained 4.3 moles of mercury per mole protein as determined by calorimeter analysis (Tyuma, et aZ., 1966); Malkip, R. observations. and Rabinowitz, J. C., unpublished d Double procedure were then
the amounts added.
of the
iron
g Protein was reisolated by gel chromatographed on OEAE-cellulose
d Protein was re' isolated by gel of by chromatography on DEAE-cellulose.
249
salt
and Na2S used
in the standard
filtration column.
on Sephadex
G-25 and
filtration
on Sephadex
G-25
instead
Vol. 29, No. 2, 1967
acid-labile
and show no enzymic
sulfhydryl
sulfhydryl free
groups
ethanol free
per mole groups
per mole
groups
The properties Ferredoxin was reduced
be reconstituted
with
2-mercaptoethanol
for
4 hours
salt
and sodium
sulfide.
captoethanol
in the absence
from
in 8 y urea
if
the
separately.
protein
mixtures
could
reconstitution.
ferredoxin-II tained
from either'apoferredoxins
In contrast
treated
with
iron
with
2-mercaptoethanol
of iron spectra. ias
to the behavior
The yield from
and 2-merbe reconsti-
was added from
sulfide
to
incubation and the other
however
it
did
not
sulfide.
apoferredoxin-III
of sulfide.
by the Prior
and urea
showdd full
apo-
P-mercaptoethanol
sulfide
ferredoxins
and sulfide
from
sulfide
or acid-labile
from
pH
of an iron
ferredoxin
or sodium
and a source
and apoferredoxin-III
absorption
Nor could
salt
The reconstituted
the same amounts
had identical
of either
the apoprotein
not be reconstituted sodium
I.
shown in Table if
was recovered,
be reconstituted
an iron
are
could
salt
reconstitution
of
to the addition
or the sodium
iron
The yield
70%.
75% of the apoprotein
the
amounts
'of the awfeyredoxin-III for
salt
About
for
significant
of both
iron
the
and 0.1 E TrissHCl,
salt,
7
prevents
prior
previously
either
required
Ferredoxin addition
the
containing
components contain
only
about
in 8 E urea
of urea.
the apoferredoxin
oxidation.
apoferredoxin-II
of an iron
of free
of P-mercapto-
apparently
is
of
contains
The presence
from
from
Ferredoxin
by the addition
0.7 moles
ferredoxins
at room temperature
ferredoxin-II
tuted
of protein.
of reconstituted
content
apoferredoxin-III
ferredoxin
could
8.5,
while
in their
in their
contains
of the apoprotein from
are similar
differ
of apoferredoxin-III
II and III
apoferredoxins
but
of protein
in the preparation sulfhydryl
activity
Apoferredoxin-II
groups.
sulfhydryl
II and III
Apoferredoxins
sulfide.
properties free
BlOCHEMlCALANDBlOPHYSlCALRESEARCHCOMMUNlCATlONS
formed
treatment
was not from
enzymic activity
as the native of ferredoxin
required
both
apo-
and con-
ferredoxin, reconstituted
70-908.
of apoferredoxins-I
and II,
apoferre-
and
Vol. 29, No.2,
1967
BIOCHEMICAL
doxin-III
binds
absence
of Na2S.
lower
than
protein
some iron
that
nor
its
content.
isolated
does it
after
groups,
not
In previous
(Malkin
they
for
1966a)
ferredoxin
could
be reconstituted
if
groups
had been
the mercury-containing
mercaptoethanol described they
are
free
differ
supported
report
reconstitution the addition
with
2-mer-
from
E-mercapto-
(Lovenberg,
these
et aZ., ferredoxin
sulfhydryl
apoproteins
treated
with
salt
the preparation
However, in which
as the S-mersalyl
were
groups.
apoferredoxins.
isolated
of an iron
of
by Suzuki
"acid-labile"
by the findings
and Rabinowitz,
teins
apoprotein
from
Prior
derivatives
an excess
and NazS.
previously
the
of 2-
The apoproteins
described
in
that
of mercury.
The recent as the source
from
protected
in the presence
here
prepared
no detectable
from
free
in the case of apoferre-
contained
not be reconstituted
can
possesses
from a',a'-dipyridyl-treated
could
sulfhydryl
salt.
ferredoxin
in 8 E urea
derivatives
Ferredoxin
free
sulfhydryl
apoferredoxin-mersalyl
and Rabinowitz,
of an iron that
to
in the protein
to disulfides.
apoferredoxin
prepared
equivalent
the apoferredoxin
are oxidized
is
iron-containing
be detected
absence
reconstitution
studies,
and apoferredoxin
could
in the
protein
test
experiments
if
salt
of acid-labile
the enzymic
these
to free
is necessary
ethanol-treated
in
NazS in the
if
the
amounts
sulfide
from
an iron
However
significant
apoferredoxin
but
with
to the recovered
ferredoxin.
with
of the disulfides
doxin-11:
bound
activity
appears
from
captoethanol
1963)
exhibit
It
incubated
of iron
in native
incubation
be reconstituted
reduction
is
No acid-labile
Discussion--
sulfhydryl
it
does not contain
sulfide, iron
The amount found
isolated
when
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
1966a),
sulfide reported
sulfide
(1967)
in non-heme
in our
previous
nor by the observation
of ferredoxins of sodium
and Kimura
acid-labile
as well
as of iron
251
iron
of cysteine
proteins
is not
investigations
reported
containing
described.
in support
here, sulfide
to the
three
(Malkin since requires apopro-
the
Vol. 29, No.2,
1967
BIOCHEMICAL
Supported, Institute
in part,
of Arthritis
Health
AND BIOPHYSICALRESEARCH
by Research
and Metabolic
Grant
A-2109
Diseases,
from
United
COMMUNICATIONS
the
National
States
Public
Service. REFERENCES
Buchanan,
B. B.,
Lovenberg,
W., and Rabinowitz,
J.
C., Proc.
NatZ. Acad.
sci. u. s., 49, 345 (1963). _m Doeg,
K. A.,
Lovenberg, 238, s-m Malkin, Malkin, Suzuki, Tyuma,
R.,
D. M., Arch.
and Ziegler, W., Buchanan, 3899 (1963).
B. B.,
Biochem.
and Rabinowitz,
Biuphys., J.
97, 37 (1962).
..,5
C., J. BtioZ. Chem.,
and Rabinowitz,
J. C.,
Biochemistry,
R., and Rabinowitz, 822 (1966b).
J. C.,
Biochwn. Biophys. Res. Conmun., 23, -w
K., I.,
and Kimura, Benesch,
T.,
R. E.,
5, 1262 (1966a).
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.,22, 514 (1967). and Benesch,
252
R., Biochemistry,
5, 2957
(1966).