Preterm infant gut colonization in the neonatal ICU and complete restoration 2 years later

Preterm infant gut colonization in the neonatal ICU and complete restoration 2 years later

Accepted Manuscript Preterm infant gut colonization in the Neonatal ICU and Complete Restoration two years later Laura Moles, Marta Gómez, Esther Jimé...

498KB Sizes 3 Downloads 52 Views

Accepted Manuscript Preterm infant gut colonization in the Neonatal ICU and Complete Restoration two years later Laura Moles, Marta Gómez, Esther Jiménez, Leónides Fernández, Gerardo Bustos, Fernando Chaves, Rafael Cantón, Juan Miguel Rodríguez, Rosa del Campo PII:

S1198-743X(15)00616-3

DOI:

10.1016/j.cmi.2015.06.003

Reference:

CMI 303

To appear in:

Clinical Microbiology and Infection

Received Date: 18 January 2015 Revised Date:

12 May 2015

Accepted Date: 5 June 2015

Please cite this article as: Moles L, Gómez M, Jiménez E, Fernández L, Bustos G, Chaves F, Cantón R, Rodríguez JM, Campo Rd, Preterm infant gut colonization in the Neonatal ICU and Complete Restoration two years later, Clinical Microbiology and Infection (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.06.003. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

Preterm Infant Gut Colonization in the Neonatal ICU and

2

Complete Restoration Two Years Later

3

Laura Moles1,2, Marta Gómez1, Esther Jiménez1,3, Leónides

5

Fernández1,3, Gerardo Bustos4,5, Fernando Chaves6,7, Rafael Cantón2,7,8,

6

Juan Miguel Rodríguez1,3, Rosa del Campo2,7,8

RI PT

4

7 8

1

9

Complutense de Madrid. 2Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigaciones Sanitarias

10

(IRYCIS), Madrid. 3ProbiSearch, S.L., Tres Cantos, Madrid. 4Servicio de Neonatología

11

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid. 5Red de Salud Materno-Infantil y del

12

Desarrollo (SAMID), Instituto Carlos III, Madrid. 6Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital

13

Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid. 7Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario

14

Ramón y Cajal, Madrid. 8Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI),

15

Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid. SPAIN.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

16

Departmento de Nutrición, Bromatología y Tecnología de los Alimentos, Universidad

Correspondence author: Rosa del Campo, Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital

18

Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Ctra. Colmenar, Km 9.1, 28034 Madrid, SPAIN.

19

Email: [email protected], Phone: +34 91 336 85 42, Fax: +34 91 336 88 09.

20 21

AC C

17

Running title: Gut Microbiota of Preterm Infants

22 23

Key words: Nosocomial High-Risk Clones, Antibiotic Resistance, Virulence Factors,

24

Human Milk, Gut Microbiota, Preterm Infants.

25

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ABSTRACT

27

Preterm infants in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) are exposed to multi-drug

28

resistant bacteria previously adapted to the hospital environment. The aim of the present

29

study was to characterize the bacterial antibiotic-resistant high-risk lineages colonizing

30

preterm infants during their NICU stay and their persistence in faeces after 2 years.

RI PT

26

A total of twenty-six preterm neonates were recruited between October 2009 and

32

June 2010 and provided 144 faecal samples. Milk samples (86 mothers’ milk, 35 human

33

donor milk, and 15 formula milk) were collected at the same time as faecal samples. An

34

additional faecal sample was recovered in 16 infants at the age of two years. Samples

35

were plated onto different selective media and one colony per morphology was selected.

36

Isolates were identified by 16S rDNA nucleotide sequence and MALDI-TOF.

37

Antibiotic susceptibility (agar dilution), genetic diversity (RAPD, PFGE and MLST)

38

and virulence factors (only in enterococcal and staphylococcal isolates) were

39

determined by PCR.

TE D

M AN U

SC

31

A high proportion of antibiotic resistant high-risk clones was detected in both

41

faecal and milk samples during the NICU admittance. Almost all infants were colonized

42

by Enterococcus faecalis ST64 and Enterococcus faecium ST18 clones, while a wider

43

genetic diversity was observed for the Gram-negative isolates. Multi-resistant high-risk

44

clones were not recovered from the faecal samples of the 2-year-old infants.

AC C

45

EP

40

In conclusion, the gut of the preterm infants admitted in NICU might be initially

46

colonized by antibiotic-resistant and virulent high-risk lineages, which are later replaced

47

by antibiotic-susceptible community ones.

48

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

INTRODUCTION

50

The gut microbiota ecosystem plays an important role in human health and its

51

alterations have been implicated in several systemic diseases, particularly in the early

52

stages of life [1]. After birth, an adequate gut microbiota establishment is essential for

53

both the innate immune system maturation and the creation of a barrier protection from

54

bacterial pathogens [2,3]. Moreover, these first bacterial cells colonizing our gut mucosa

55

might persist in symbiosis with our enterocytes throughout our complete life.

RI PT

49

Bacterial gut colonization starts during the intrauterine stage, increasing

57

drastically during the delivery and the first days of life [4-6]. This process can be

58

adversely affected by numerous factors, including antibiotic treatment, caesarean

59

delivery, early separation from the mother, formula feeding, invasive medical

60

treatments and long stays in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) [7,8]. Some of these

61

factors are usually associated with premature infants who in addition have a delayed or

62

aberrant gut microbiota characterized by poor global bacterial diversity and a low and

63

rather fluctuating Bifidobacterium population [9-11].

TE D

M AN U

SC

56

During their usually long NICU stays, preterm infants are exposed to multi-drug

65

resistant bacteria previously adapted to the hospital environment, that have been

66

recognized as high-risk clones. Most of these high-risk clones belong to the ESKAPE

67

group (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae,

68

Acinetobacter baumanii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) [12,13].

69

Furthermore, these preterm infants are usually treated with antibiotics which also select

70

the multiresistant bacteria that might colonize their guts.

AC C

EP

64

71

In the last years, the implementations of metagenomic tools based on 16S rDNA

72

massive sequence has provide large information about the complexity of the gut

73

microbiota ecosystem [14], including the identification of uncultured microorganisms.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 74

However, classical and extended techniques based on classical microbiological cultures

75

as culturomics, also provides a comprehensive approach for the human gut microbiota

76

study, and allowed us the further characterization of the bacterial isolates [15]. Although previous studies have assessed the gut colonization of preterm infants,

78

little is known about its evolution after hospital discharge and in their first years of life,

79

particularly around the two years of life, when a mature microbiota has been already

80

established. The aim of the present study is to characterize the bacterial lineages

81

colonizing premature infants during their NICU admittance and their persistence after 2

82

years, which is the age when the infant’s gut starts to contain an adult-like microbiota

83

[16,17].

84

M AN U

SC

RI PT

77

METHODS

86

Subjects and sampling

87

Twenty-six preterm infants (≤32 weeks of gestation and/or ≤1,500 g of weight) born

88

between October 2009 and June 2010 in the 12 de Octubre University Hospital in

89

Madrid were included in the study. Preterm infants with malformations, metabolic

90

diseases or severe conditions were excluded. Relevant demographic and clinical data are

91

summarized in Table 1. The local ethic committee approved the study (reference

92

09/157), and parents signed the fully informed consent. Following the routine NICU

93

feeding protocols, all infants were preferably fed with their own mother’s milk and

94

when this was not possible, with pasteurized human milk from the Milk Bank Unit.

95

When the weight of the infants was ≥1,500 grams and their own mother’s milk was

96

unavailable, they received adapted preterm formula. The fortifier FM 85 (Nestle) was

97

used approximately from the fourth week of life with an initial dose of 1 g per 50 ml of

98

milk that was increased to 1 g per 20 ml. Globally, the feeding patterns of the recruited

AC C

EP

TE D

85

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 99 100

infants were very heterogeneous, a fact that prevented the formation of well-defined feeding groups. The first spontaneously evacuated meconium after delivery and faecal samples

102

were collected weekly during the first month of life and, then, every 15 days until

103

discharged from the NICU. Samples were collected and immediately stored at -80ºC.

104

Once the infants were 2-years-old, an additional faecal sample was also collected

105

although we only were able to contact 16 out of the 26 families.

RI PT

101

Mother’s milk was extracted using electric pumps and stored either refrigerated

107

for a maximum of 24 h or frozen for up to 6 months. Donor milk, pasteurized at 62.5ºC

108

after collection has a shelf life of 3 months. All milks were incubated for 10-15 min at

109

37-40ºC and administered to the infant through an orogastric or nasogastric feeding tube

110

using a syringe (manual feeding) or a pump (automatic feeding). Milk samples were

111

always collected after feeding from either the syringe or the extension set connected

112

with the orogastric or nasogastric feeding tube, at the same sampling times as the faecal

113

ones.

TE D

M AN U

SC

106

Bacterial strains causing a bacteraemia were recovered from the blood samples

115

after their identification was performed at the Department of Microbiology at the 12 de

116

Octubre University Hospital.

AC C

117

EP

114

118

Culture analysis of the samples

119

Suitable dilutions of milk and faecal samples obtained during the NICU stay were

120

spread onto Man Rogosa Sharpe (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) supplemented or not with L-

121

cysteine (0.5 g/L) (Sigma, St. Louis, USA) for lactic acid bacteria isolation;

122

MacConkey (BioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) for Enterobacteriaceae; Baird Parker

123

(BioMérieux) for staphyloccoci, Brain Heart Infusion (Oxoid), Wilkins-Chalgren

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 124

(Oxoid) and finally in Columbia Nalidixic Acid (BioMérieux) as general agar media

125

plates for isolation of bacterial organisms. Persistence of selected antibiotic resistant strains acquired in the NICU stay was

127

evaluated in faecal samples of the 2-year-old infants; on the one hand with selective

128

agar media supplemented or not with antibiotics such as Manitol Salt Agar for

129

staphylococci (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, USA) and M-Enterococcus agar (Difco)

130

alone and supplemented with 16 µg/ml of ampicillin or 16 µg/ml of erythromycin. On

131

the other hand MacConkey plates were supplemented with 4 µg/ml of ciprofloxacin, or

132

2 µg/ml of imipenem or 1 µg/ml of cefotaxime.

SC

RI PT

126

Plates were aerobically incubated at 37ºC for up to 48 h, with the exception of the

134

Wilkins-Chalgren and Man Rogosa Sharpe-cysteine plates that were anaerobically

135

incubated (85% nitrogen, 10% hydrogen, and 5% carbon dioxide) in an anaerobic

136

workstation (Mini-MACS Don Whitley Scientific Limited, Shipley, UK) at 37ºC for 48

137

h. Bacterial counts were recorded as the colony forming units (CFU) per gram of

138

meconium or faeces, or CFU per ml of milk, and transformed to log10 values.

TE D

M AN U

133

139

Bacterial identification and genotyping

141

After the initial samples processing, ~4000 colonies were selected including at least one

142

colony per morphology, media and sample. Isolates were subcultured in Brain Heart

143

Infusion and Man Rogosa Sharpe media. In order to avoid repeated isolates, those with

144

the same morphology from the same media and sample were submitted to randomly

145

amplified polymorphic DNA polymerase chain reactions (RAPD-PCR) using the primer

146

OPL5 (5’-ACGCAGGCAC-3’) [18]. Finally, at least one representative isolate from

147

each sample, media, and infant was further selected. Bacterial identification was

148

performed

AC C

EP

140

by

matrix-assisted

laser

desorption/ionization

time-of-flight

mass

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) combined with

150

16S rDNA PCR amplification and further nucleotide sequencing. Staphylococcal

151

species belonging to the species S. aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, or

152

Staphylococcus hominis were identified by a multiplex PCR method based on the dnaJ

153

genes [4].

RI PT

149

154

Genetic diversity

156

The genetic diversity of all selected isolates was assessed by pulsed field gel

157

electrophoresis (PFGE) in a CHEF DR II apparatus (Bio-Rad, Birmingham, UK). To

158

separate SmaI digested fragments of enterococci and staphylococci different protocols

159

were applied (2 to 28 s for 24 h; and 5 to 15 s for 10 h and then 15 to 60 s for 13 h,

160

respectively). The chromosomal DNA of K. pneumoniae isolates was digested with

161

XbaI enzyme and the electrophoresis conditions were 1 to 40 s for 20 h. Dendrograme

162

analysis of PFGE profiles was performed using the UPGMA method based on the Dice

163

similarity by the Phoretix 5.0 software (Nonlinear Dynamics Ltd., United Kingdom).

TE D

M AN U

SC

155

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) schemes were applied for PFGE unrelated

165

strains of Enterococcus faecalis, E. faecium and S. aureus (www.mlst.net); Escherichia

166

coli (http://mlst.ucc.ie/mlst/dbs/Ecoli), and K. pneumoniae (http://www.pasteur.fr

167

/recherche/genopole/PF8/mlst/Kpneumoniae.html). The E. coli phylogenetic group was

168

also determined by PCR [19]. MLST was represented by Minimum Spanning Tree

169

algorithm using the Phyloviz software (http://www.phyloviz.net)

AC C

EP

164

170

171

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

172

Antibiotic susceptibility for ampicillin, cefotaxime, imipenem, gentamicin, kanamycin,

173

erythromycin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and vancomycin was determined only in the

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 174

selected isolates for PFGE and MLST typing by agar dilution following the Clinical and

175

Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines and breakpoints for each genus/specie [20].

176

All antibiotics were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (http://www.sigmaaldrich.

177

com/).

RI PT

178

Virulence factors carriage

180

Presence of genes encoding for sex pheromones (ccf, cpd, cad, cob), cell wall adhesins

181

(efaAfs), the aggregation protein (agg2), the protein involved in immune evasion (epsfs)

182

presence, the extracellular metaloendopeptidase (gelE) and the cytolisine (cylA) for

183

enterococci were assessed by the procedure described by Eaton and Gasson and

184

modified by Reviriego et al., [21,22].

M AN U

SC

179

Carriage of hemolysins (hla, hlb, hlg, hld) and adhesins (fnbA, clfa, sdrE, ebpS)

186

genes in the S. aureus isolates was determined by two multiplex PCRs [23], while a

187

single PCR scheme was used for the detection of the genes encoding the exfoliative

188

toxin A (eta), toxic shock syndrome toxin (tst), adhesion for collagen (cna) [24],

189

Panton-Valentin leukocidin components S and F (pvl-S/F) [25], Panton-Valentin

190

leukocidin components M and F (pvl-M/F) [26], staphylococcal enterotoxins (se-adej)

191

[27], polysaccharide intracellular adhesion (icaA) [28], methicillin resistance (mecA)

192

[29], β-lactamase (blaZ) [30], and iron siderophore transporter (sirB) [31]. At least one

193

isolate per infant and sample obtained during the NICU admission was evaluated for

194

virulence factors carriage.

AC C

EP

TE D

185

195

196

RESULTS

197

The main demographic and clinical data of the 26 preterm infants are described in Table

198

1. In all but one infant, the ampicillin-gentamicin combination was administered at birth

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT as empirical treatment, whereas teicoplanin, gentamicin, amikacin and ambisome were

200

used in the septic episodes (Figure 1). Seven infants (27%) had, at least, one

201

bacteraemic episode, and the foremost species involved were coagulase-negative

202

staphylococci (n=5), Serratia marcescens (n=3), K. pneumoniae (n=2), and P.

203

aeruginosa (n=2) (Figure 1).

RI PT

199

A total of 296 samples from infant’s faeces (144 during the NICU admission and

205

16 at 2 years-old), 86 from mother’s milk, 35 from donor’s milk, and 15 from formula’s

206

milk were processed. These samples yield ~4000 bacterial isolates and the most

207

numerous species was E. faecalis (n=564), followed by S. epidermidis (n=420), S.

208

marcescens (n=267), E. coli (n=252), K. pneumoniae (n=228), E. faecium (n=108) and

209

S. aureus (n=60) (Table 2). Other less abundant but still relevant species belonged to

210

Enterobacter (n=71), Pseudomonas (n=22), Acinetobacter genera (n=16), and others

211

(Suplementary Figure 1).

M AN U

SC

204

The number of strains with different PFGE profiles coexisting in the same infant

213

during NICU admittance oscillated between 1 and 5 for E. faecalis, 1 and 4 for E.

214

faecium, 1 and 10 for S. aureus, and 1 and 3 in K. pneumoniae. The final collection of

215

unrelated isolates was composed by 67 E. faecalis, 48 E. coli, 43 K. pneumoniae, 22 E.

216

faecium, and 17 S. aureus isolates, which were submitted to antibiotic susceptibility

217

testing and MLST typing. At this stage, S. epidermidis isolates were not studied further

218

due to their high number and the high genetic diversity observed; Serratia isolates were

219

excluded from the analysis due to the lack of an MLST scheme, while Acinetobacter,

220

Pseudomonas and Enterobacter isolates were scarcely represented in our population.

AC C

EP

TE D

212

221

The proportion of the high-risk clones detected in the faecal samples during the

222

NICU admittance was considerable: 5 (ST16-CC8, ST21-CC21, ST40-CC40, ST56-

223

CC30 and ST64-CC8) of the 8 STs found among the E. faecalis isolates; 2 (ST18-CC18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT and ST132-CC18) of 3 in E. faecium; 6 (ST8-CC8, ST30-CC30, ST34-CC30, ST45-

225

CC45, ST121-CC121, and ST1490-CC8) of 7 in S. aureus, 5 (ST58, ST59, ST69,

226

ST393, ST2904) of 10 in E. coli, and finally 5 (ST25, ST29, ST35, ST45, and ST1547,

227

all of them fit into the CC292) of 12 in K. pneumoniae. Isolates belonging to these high-

228

risk clones exhibited resistance to most of the studied antibiotics and carried multiple

229

virulent factors (Figure 2).

RI PT

224

It is of note that identical STs with the same antibiotic resistance phenotype and

231

the same virulence factors were also detected in the milk and formula samples. In infant

232

14, E. faecalis ST56 and K. pneumoniae ST505 were simultaneously detected in faeces

233

and in blood samples during a bacteraemic episode. Infant 12 died in the NICU after a

234

complicated E. coli bacteraemia.

M AN U

SC

230

Almost all infants were colonized by both E. faecalis ST64 (19/24) and E.

236

faecium ST18 (9/12) clones, while a wider genetic diversity was observed for the Gram-

237

negative isolates. The predominant clones were ST393 for E. coli (8/20) and ST641 for

238

K. pneumoniae (8/16) (Figure 3).

TE D

235

Among the E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates, a high level of antibiotic resistance

240

was observed, especially for tetracycline (96.7% and 97.4%) and erythromycin (68.8%

241

and 92.9%); whereas ampicillin resistance was only detected in E. faecium isolates

242

(92.2%). E. faecalis ST16 and ST40 clones harbored the highest number of virulence

243

determinants. The most common virulent genes were gelE (84.3%), ccf (100%) and

244

efaAfs (95.7%) in E. faecalis isolates, and epsfs (24.8%), gelE (10.3%) and ccf (10.3%) in

245

E. faecium isolates (Figure 2).

AC C

EP

239

246

Globally, hld, fnbA, clfA, and icaA were the most frequent virulence genes in the

247

S. aureus isolates which were susceptible to the evaluated antibiotics, although 43% of

248

them exhibited resistance to gentamicin (Figure 2).

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT For the E. coli isolates, high percentages of tetracycline resistance (46%), and

250

ciprofloxacin (32%) were observed (Figure 2). As to K. pneumoniae, 21% of the

251

isolates were resistant to tetracycline while those belonging to the predominant K.

252

pneumoniae ST641 subgroup displayed resistance to ciprofloxacin, imipenem and

253

cefotaxime (Figure 2).

RI PT

249

In contrast, isolates from the faecal samples collected from the 2-year-old infants

255

were susceptible to the antibiotics and the proportion of high–risk clones was reduced:

256

3 (ST16-CC8, ST40-CC40, and ST64-CC8) of 7 in E. faecalis; none for E. faecium and

257

S. aureus, 5 (ST10-CC10, ST57, ST59, ST69, ST131, and ST3570-CC23) of 10 in E.

258

coli, and finally 1 (ST1486-CC292) of 2 in K. pneumoniae (Figure 2).

M AN U

SC

254

259

DISCUSSION

261

Recent studies have demonstrated that bacterial colonization starts during pregnancy

262

[4,32,33], and in fact the placenta harbours its own microbiota [34]. According to

263

general agreement, the first gut bacterial colonization constitutes the core of the future

264

microbiota that can influence the host’s gastrointestinal system and general health

265

throughout life. The definitive gut microbiota is usually established at the age of two

266

years, when the complete diet has introduced.

EP

AC C

267

TE D

260

In the present work, we analyzed the gut microbiota of the preterm infants during

268

their hospital admittance and its maintenance overtime. In contrast to the next

269

generation massive sequence tools, we preferred the classical techniques based on

270

microbiological culture, in order to collect the bacterial strains for further

271

characterization. A high proportion of high-risk clones linked to nosocomial infection

272

were detected both in the milk administered to the infants and in their faeces. As the

273

different milks had been processed and properly stored, the bacterial load could not be

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT attributed to a dramatic and continuous food contamination. In the NICU where the

275

preterm infants were recruited, single-use sterilized and ready-to-use preterm formula

276

are purchased while donor’s milk is pasteurized and, then, submitted to strict

277

microbiological controls. In relation to mother’s milk that has not been pasteurized, it

278

has been described that contains its own microbiota [35, 36], but its composition and

279

concentration differ considerably from the results obtained in this study. Milk sampling

280

process represents a limitation of our study, because we only collected the milk after the

281

tube or syringe pass, and we cannot ruled out that the milk might be also contaminated

282

previously.

SC

RI PT

274

The orogastric or nasogastric feeding tubes, irrespective of the feeding regime,

284

can act as locus for the bacterial attachment and multiplication of numerous

285

opportunistic pathogens [37, 38], and they constitute an important risk factor in the

286

neonatal infections [39]. In agreement with our results, the feeding system might act as

287

a reservoir for the hospital adapted high-risk bacterial clones and contaminate the

288

human and formula milk samples during their passage. After this study, the feeding

289

systems protocol in preterm infants of our NICU was subsequently modified and

290

nowadays the enteral tubes are replaced in a maximum of 48 hours. Other relevant

291

limitation was the lack of maternal samples to complete discharged the existence of

292

these multirresistant clones in their gut or skin microbiota. We hypothesized that the

293

clones have a nosocomial origin, although the maternal source also represents an

294

important option.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

283

295

On the other hand, sepsis is one of the main causes of death in the NICU, and its

296

prevention and treatment considerably increase the sanitary costs [40]. The main

297

bacteria causing outbreaks in the NICU is S. epidermidis, followed by K. pneumoniae,

298

Serratia spp., E. coli and Enterococcus spp. Among them, hospital-adapted high-risk

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT clones that exhibit antibiotic resistance and contain virulence factors are of the

300

uppermost relevance [41,42]. In this study, the structure and main characteristics of the

301

E. faecalis, E. faecium, S. aureus, E. coli and K. pneumoniae populations were

302

investigated since they were considered to be the most representative species in the

303

analyzed samples.

RI PT

299

Epidemiological molecular studies based on MLST schemes have demonstrated

305

that the nosocomial pathogens usually grouped in particular lineages as CC10 in E. coli,

306

ST258 in K. pneumoniae [43], CC2/CC9 in E. faecalis, CC17 in E. faecium, and

307

CC5/CC8/CC30/CC45 in S. aureus [44]. In our study the proportion of these high-risk

308

clones detected in the faecal and milk samples was high, although the clonal

309

replacement observed (Figure 2) prevented an epidemic situation in the NICU (Figure

310

3).

M AN U

SC

304

Despite the elevated amount of enterococci isolates obtained during the NICU

312

stay (564 E. faecalis and 108 E. faecium), a low genetic diversity was observed (8 E.

313

faecalis and 3 E. faecium STs), whereas the remaining genera showed a higher

314

variability (7 STs of S. aureus from 7 infants, 10 STs of E. coli and 12 STs of K.

315

pneumoniae). Only E. faecalis ST64 and ST40 clones persisted during almost all the

316

studied period (Figure 3) which signified that the epidemiological measures implanted

317

routinely in this NICU are adequate including hand-washing protocols, aseptic

318

conditions for milk manipulation, early detection and further isolation of antibiotic

319

multi-resistant carriers, segregation of patients and staff during epidemic outbreaks, and

320

adequate antibiotic politics in consensus with the Microbiology Department.

AC C

EP

TE D

311

321

All but one infant received empirical antibiotic therapy after birth. Although the

322

prophylactic use of antibiotics immediately after birth usually exerts a negative

323

influence on early gut colonization and its protective effect has not been demonstrated

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [43], a correct antibiotic therapy may be decisive to assure the survival of many preterm

325

infants. However, it is obvious that this routine practice may be a selector for antibiotic

326

resistant isolates that, subsequently, could be overrepresented, on a long-term basis, in

327

the host’s gut [44]. Therefore, persistence of the high-risk antibiotic-resistant clones

328

acquired during the NICU stay was evaluated in the same cohort two years after birth.

329

Interestingly, the initial antibiotic-resistant isolates and high-risk clones were scarcely

330

detected but, in turn, other clones, mainly observed in the community and initially non-

331

detected, such as E. coli ST131, ST10-CC10 or ST3570-CC23, were found.

SC

RI PT

324

Previous theories generally assume that the first bacterial isolates reaching the

333

almost “microbial-free” gut during or after birth have a founder effect and, therefore,

334

they tended to persist as members of the gut microbiota throughout life [45]. In contrast,

335

our results showed that after the important selective pressures received early in life by

336

the preterm infants, the initial nosocomial and antibiotic-resistant high-risk lineages had

337

been replaced in their gut by antibiotic-susceptible community lineages when they were

338

2-year-old, when perturbations of the early microbiota decrease and become adult-like

339

microbiota [16,17].

EP

340

TE D

M AN U

332

Author Contributions

342

Laura Moles, Leónides Fernández, Rafael Cantón, Juan Miguel Rodríguez and Rosa del

343

Campo conceptualized and designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript, and

344

approved the final manuscript as submitted. Laura Moles, Marta Gómez, and Esther

345

Jiménez carried out the samples analyses, and the experimental data collection,

346

reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

347

Gerardo Bustos, Fernando Chaves participated in the patient’s recruitment, the sample

348

collection and coordinated and supervised clinical data collection at the 12 de Octubre

AC C

341

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 349

Hospital. Also, they critically reviewed the manuscript, and approved the final

350

manuscript as submitted.

351

Acknowledgments

353

We are grateful to the infant and their families and particularly to the staff of the

354

Department of Neonatology of the 12 de Octubre University Hospital.

RI PT

352

This work was supported by the PI13/00205 project (ISCIII-FIS), and by the

356

AGL2013-41980-P project, both from the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness

357

(MINECO, Spain), and co-financed by the European Development Regional Fund “A

358

Way to Achieve Europe,” ERDF, Spanish Network for the Research in Infectious

359

Diseases (REIPI RD12/0015). L.M. and M.G. were the recipients of predoctoral

360

contracts from MINECO.

361

M AN U

SC

355

Transparency Declaration

363

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

EP AC C

364

TE D

362

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 365

REFERENCES

366

1.

microbiome in early life: health and disease. Front Immunol 2014; 5:427.

367

2.

gut microbiota. Science 2013; 341:1237439.

369 370

Faith JJ, Guruge JL, Charbonneau M, et al. The long-term stability of the human

3.

RI PT

368

Arrieta MC, Stiemsma LT, Amenyogbe N, Brown EM, Finlay B. The intestinal

Collado MC, Cernada M, Baüerl C, Vento M, Pérez-Martínez G. Microbial ecology and host-microbiota interactions during early life stages. Gut Microbes 2012;

372

3:352-365. 4.

actually sterile? Res Microbiol 2008; 159:187-193.

374 375

Jiménez E, Marín ML, Martín R, et al. Is meconium from healthy newborns

5.

M AN U

373

SC

371

DiGiulio DB, Romero R, Amogan HP, et al. Microbial prevalence, diversity and

376

abundance in amniotic fluid during preterm labor: a molecular and culture-based

377

investigation. PLoS ONE 2008; 3:e3056. 6.

Madan JC, Salari RC, Saxena D, et al. Gut microbial colonisation in premature

TE D

378 379

neonates predicts neonatal sepsis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012;

380

97:F456-462.

intestinal microbiota in early infancy. Pediatrics 2006; 118:511-521.

382 383

8.

Murgas Torrazza R, Neu J. The developing intestinal microbiome and its

relationship to health and disease in the neonate. J Perinatol 2011; 31(Suppl

384

1):S29–S34.

385 386

Penders J, Thijs C, Vink C, et al. Factors influencing the composition of the

EP

7.

AC C

381

9.

Magne F, Abély M, Boyer F, et al. Low species diversity and high interindividual

387

variability in faeces of preterm infants as revealed by sequences of 16S rRNA

388

genes and PCR-temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis profiles. FEMS

389

Microbiol Ecol 2006; 57:128–138.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 390 391

10. Westerbeek E, Berg A, Lafeber H, et al. The intestinal bacterial colonisation in preterminfants: A review of the literature. Clin Nutr 2006; 25:361–368. 11. Moles L, Gómez M, Heilig H, et al. Bacterial diversity in meconium of preterm

393

neonates and evolution of their fecal microbiota during the first month of life. PLoS

394

ONE 2013; 8(6):e66986.

395 396

RI PT

392

12. Pendleton JN, Gorman SP, Gilmore BF. Clinical relevance of the ESKAPE pathogens. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2013; 11:297-308.

13. Boucher HW, Talbot GH, Bradley JS, et al. Bad bugs, no drugs: no ESKAPE! An

398

update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009;

399

48:1-12.

401

M AN U

400

SC

397

14. Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, et al. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature 201; 473:174-180.

15. Lagier JC, Hugon P, Khelaifia S, Fournier PE, La Scola B, Raoult D. The rebirth of

403

culture in microbiology through the example of culturomics to study human gut

404

microbiota. Clin Microbiol Rev 2015; 28:237-64.

TE D

402

16. Koenig JE, Spor A, Scalfone N, et al. Succession of microbial consortia in the

406

developing infant gut microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108(Suppl

407

1):4578-4585.

409 410 411 412 413

17. Yatsunenko T, Rey FE, Manary MJ, et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across

AC C

408

EP

405

age and geography. Nature 2012; 486:222-227.

18. Ruiz-Barba JL, Maldonado A, Jiménez-Díaz R. Small-scale total DNA extraction from bacteria and yeast for PCR applications. Anal Biochem 2005; 347:333-335. 19. Clermont O, Bonacorsi S, Bingen E. Rapid and simple determination of the Escherichia coli phylogenetic group. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000; 66:4555-4558.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 414

20. Clinical and

Laboratory Standards

Institute. Performance Standards for

415

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Twenty-first Informational Supplement

416

M100-S21. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI; 2011. 21. Eaton TJ, Gasson MJ. Molecular screening of Enterococcus virulence determinants

418

and potential for genetic exchange between food and medical isolates. Appl

419

Environ Microbiol 2001; 67:1628-1635.

RI PT

417

22. Reviriego C, Eaton T, Martín R, et al. Screening of virulence determinants in

421

Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from breast milk. J Hum Lact 2005; 21:131-

422

137.

SC

420

23. Delgado S, García P, Fernández L, et al. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus

424

strains involved in human and bovine mastitis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol

425

2011; 62:225-235.

427

24. van Leeuwen WB, Melles DC, Alaidan A, et al. Host- and tissue-specific pathogenic traits of Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 2005; 187:4584-4591.

TE D

426

M AN U

423

25. Jarraud S, Mougel C, Thioulouse J, et al. Relationships between Staphylococcus

429

aureus genetic background, virulence factors, agr groups (alleles), and human

430

disease. Infect Immun 2002; 70:631-641.

EP

428

26. Yamada T, Tochimaru N, Nakasuji S, et al. Leukotoxin family genes in

432

Staphylococcus aureus isolated from domestic animals and prevalence of lukM-

433 434

AC C

431

lukF-PV genes by bacteriophages in bovine isolates. Vet Microbiol 2005; 110:97103.

435

27. Martı́n MC, González-Hevia MA, Mendoza MC. Usefulness of a two-step PCR

436

procedure for detection and identification of enterotoxigenic staphylococci of

437

bacterial isolates and food samples. Food Microbiol 2003; 20:605-610.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 438

28. Peacock SJ, Moore CE, Justice A, et al. Virulent combinations of adhesin and toxin

439

genes in natural populations of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 2002;

440

70:4987-4996. 29. Mehrotra M, Wang G, Johnson WM. Multiplex PCR for detection of genes for

442

Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins, exfoliative toxins, toxic shock syndrome toxin

443

1, and methicillin resistance. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38:1032-1035.

RI PT

441

30. Martineau F, Picard FJ, Lansac N, et al. Correlation between the resistance

445

genotype determined by multiplex PCR assays and the antibiotic susceptibility

446

patterns of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrob

447

Agents Chemother 2000; 44:231-238.

449

M AN U

448

SC

444

31. Dale SE, Sebulsky MT, Heinrichs DE. Involvement of SirABC in iron-siderophore import in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 2004; 186:8356-8362. 32. Jiménez E, Fernández L, Marín ML, et al. Isolation of commensal bacteria from

451

umbilical cord blood of healthy neonates born by cesarean section. Curr Microbiol

452

2005; 51:270-274.

TE D

450

33. Rautava S, Luoto R, Salminen S, Isolauri E. Microbial contact during pregnancy,

454

intestinal colonization and human disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;

455

9:565-576.

457 458 459 460 461

34. Aagaard K, Ma J, Antony KM, Ganu R, Petrosino J, Versalovic J. The placenta

AC C

456

EP

453

harbors a unique microbiome. Sci Transl Med 2014; 6:237ra65.

35. Martín V, Maldonado-Barragán A, Moles L, et al. Sharing of bacterial strains between breast milk and infant feces. J Hum Lact 2012; 28:36-44. 36. Fernández L, Langa S, Martín V, et al. The human milk microbiota: origin and potential roles in health and disease. Pharmacol Res 2013; 69:1-10.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 462

37. Mehall JR, Kite CA, Saltzman DA, Wallett T, Jackson RJ, Smith SD. Prospective

463

study of the incidence and complications of bacterial contamination of enteral

464

feeding in neonates. J Pediatr Surg. 2002; 37:1177-1182. 38. Mehall JR, Kite CA, Gilliam CH, Jackson RJ, Smith SD. Enteral feeding tubes are

466

a reservoir for nosocomial antibiotic-resistant pathogens. J Pediatr Surg 2002;

467

37:1011-1012.

469

39. Hurrell E, Kucerova E, Loughlin M, et al. Neonatal enteral feeding tubes as loci for colonisation by members of the Enterobacteriaceae. BMC Infect Dis 2009; 9:146.

SC

468

RI PT

465

40. Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Bahl R, et al. Can available interventions end preventable

471

deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost? Lancet 2014;

472

384:347-370.

M AN U

470

41. Willems RJ, Hanage WP, Bessen DE, Feil EJ. Population biology of Gram-positive

474

pathogens: high-risk clones for dissemination of antibiotic resistance. FEMS

475

Microbiol Rev 2011; 35:872-900.

TE D

473

42. Woodford N, Turton JF, Livermore DM. Multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria: the

477

role of high-risk clones in the dissemination of antibiotic resistance. FEMS

478

Microbiol Rev 2011; 35:736-755.

480

43. Tagare A, Kadam S, Vaidya U, Pandit A. Routine antibiotic use in preterm neonates: a randomised controlled trial. J Hosp Infect 2010; 74:332-326.

AC C

479

EP

476

481

44. Costello EK, Carlisle EM, Bik EM, Morowitz MJ, Relman DA. Microbiome

482

assembly across multiple body sites in low-birthweight infants. MBio. 2013;

483 484 485

4:e00782-13. 45. David LA, Materna AC, Friedman J, et al. Host lifestyle affects human microbiota on daily timescales. Genome Biol 2014; 15:R89.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

TABLE 1. Demographic data and clinical characteristics of the 26 preterm

2

infants included in this study Number of infants or Mean value (range)

Variable

28 (26.6-28.7)

RI PT

Gestational age (wk) Male/Female (n)

13/13

Birth weight (g)

1167 (987.3-1347.3)

Z SCORE

-0.23 (-0.50/0.04) 12/14

Sepsis

7

No Yes <3 days

25 12 13

Days with parenteral nutrition (n=22)

10 (3-12)a

Days with enteral feeding tube (n=26)

59 (46-72) 14 (0-10)a

Days with mechanical ventilation (n=16) Days with CPAPb (n=21)

18.5 (1.5-39)a

Days with oxygen therapy (n=20)

33.5 (1.5-39)a

EP

Days in NICU (n=26)

Days at Hospital (n=26) a

52 (18-81)a 69 (41-92)a

Median (IQR). bCPAP: Continuous positive airway pressure.

AC C

4

1

TE D

>3 days

M AN U

Prophylactic antibiotherapy at birth

3

SC

Vaginal/Cesarean section (n)

wk=weeks, n=number, g=gram.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

TABLE 2. Bacterial species and total counts in each type of sample Feces (n=144)a

Mother’s milk (n=86)

No.

CFU/g

E. faecalis

24

116

103-1010

49

101-108

E. faecium

12

47

105-1010

6

S. epidermidis

26

62

102-109

S. aureus

7

18

E. coli

19

K. pneumoniae S. marcenses

Formula Milk (n=15)

No.

CFU/ml

No.

CFU/ml

15

101-106

3

103-106

104-106

1

101

0

-

71

101-107

8

101-105

1

102

105-108

8

102-106

4

101-102

1

102

62

105-1010

10

102-105

2

102

1

102

16

63

105-1010

15

102-106

5

103-107

1

104

25

68

107-1010

103-108

10

102-107

4

102-106

56

6

a

7

CFU/g or CFU/ml, Colony forming units per gram or milliliter.

EP

Fecal samples recovered during the NICU admittance, the fecal samples of the 2 year-olds were not included.

AC C

8

CFU/ml

M AN U

No.

SC

(n=26)

Donor Milk (n=35)

RI PT

Infants

TE D

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

31

2190

V

M

5

26

2

30

1150

C

M

26

42

3

27

1080

C

F

49

60

4

30

2030

C

M

8

27

5

30

1760

C

M

7

27

6

24

600

C

F

99

113

7

27

1540

V

M

35

68

8

26

790

V

F

68

84

Clo + Amk (4)

SC

1

RI PT

NICU Discharge GA Weight Infant (weeks) (gr) DM Gender (days) (days)

9

25

700

C

M

195

196

10

31

1890

V

F

5

19

11

32

1310

V

F

14

28

12

24

800

V

M

41

41

M AN U

K. pneumoniae + P. mirabilis

Amp + Clo + Amk + Mer

SCN 30

1350

C

F

18

44

14

26

920

V

F

97

102

Amb (4) + Fluc (1)

29

1040

C

F

32

47

16

24

740

V

M

97

116

SCN

17

25

720

V

M

140

144

Van + Amk (7)/ Amb (6)`/ Mica (11) + Fluc (9)

18

28

1100

C

M

43

73

19

31

1430

V

F

20

37

950

C

M

54

21

24

750

C

F

81

92

22

24

870

C

M

82

102

23

27

1040

V

F

43

68

24

29

680

C

M

60

70

25

30

1370

V

F

14

41

26

28

1150

C

F

70

31

52

S. marcenses S. marcenses + E. faecalis

Gen + Tei

EP

27

SCN + P. aeruginosa + K. pneumoniae

Van + Amk (7)

Gen + Van + Amb (5) / Cef (4) / Mero (28)

P. aeruginosa

Gen (4) / Amk (4) Tei (12)

AC C

20

Van + Amk (14) /Mer (3)

Gen (14) +Vanc (9) + Amk (13) +Mer (4)

15

Gen (36) + Clo (3) + Amk (8) + Mer (37) + Amb (43) + Fluoro (5)

E. coli

Gen + Van (3)

TE D

13

SCN

Ceft (7) Amb (8) Fluco (21)

Gen + Clo (1) / Van + Amk (6) / Ambi (8) Fluco (10)

S. marcenses SCN Gen (6) / Tei (13) / Ery (1) / Ambi (13) Vanc +Amk + Amb + Fluco

Gen + Clox

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Figure 1. Main characteristic of each preterm infant and their NICU admittance period, including the bacterial pathogens detected in feces

RI PT

represented in the different colors. The grey bar indicates the NICU stay of the infant, the different color bars inside the grey one are the bacterial species detected in the feces of the infant, and the sampling time is pointed in dark inside. Each bacteraemic episode and the corresponding

arrows. Infant 12 is highlighted in red as it was the patient that died.

SC

bacterial species is marked with a red arrow. The antibiotic treatment of each infant and the number of days are also represented with grey

M AN U

GA: Gestational Age; DM: Delivery mode, Amb: Ambisome, Amk: Amikacin, Amp: Ampicillin, Clox: Cloxacilina, Ery: Erhytromycin, Flu:

AC C

EP

TE D

Fluconazol, Fluoro: Fluorocytosine, Gen: Gentamicin, Mer: Meropenem, Mica: Micafungine, Tei: Teicoplanin, Vanc: Vancomycin.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Enterococcus faecalis

ST81

ST21

ST16 1/2/0

ST179

1/0/1

5/3/0

ST64

0/0/1

RI PT

ST538

0/0/7

ST537 0/0/1

ST133

ST56

SC

0/0/1

ST30

ST40

5/4/0

15/13/0

7/5/0

M AN U

0/3/0

Fecal samples during NICU stance

TE D

Milk samples Fecal samples at 2 years

EP

Virulence factors

gelE cylA ccf

AC C

ST16 ST21 ST30 ST34 ST40 ST56 ST64 ST81

efa

cpd

esp agg2 cad

ST34

6/0/0

0% <50% >50% 100%

Antibiotic susceptibility HLR HLR cob Amp Gm Km Ery

Tet

Cip Van

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Enterococcus faecium

ST18 ST675

3/2/0

SC

0/0/1

RI PT

ST765

M AN U

ST132

9/1/0

0/1/0

Fecal samples during NICU stance

TE D

Milk samples Fecal samples at 2 years

Antibiotic susceptibility

EP

Virulence factors gelE cylL

ccf

efa

AC C

ST18 ST132 ST765

cpd

esp agg2 cad

0% <50% >50% 100%

cob

HLR HLR Amp Gm Km

Ery

Tet

Cip

Van

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Staphylococcus areus

ST121 ST34

ST30

RI PT

1/1/0 2/0/0

ST45 ST378

1/1/0

1/1/0

ST1490

SC

1/0/0

M AN U

ST8

0/2/0

Fecal samples during NICU stance Milk samples

TE D

Fecal samples at 2 years

Virulence factors

hlb

hld

hlg

tst

AC C

ST8 ST30 ST34 ST45 ST121 ST378 ST1490

hla

S/F

0% <50% >50% 100%

Antibiotic susceptibility

HLR HLR M/F fnbA clfA sdrE ebpS icaA mecA blaZ sirB Amp Gm Km Ery

EP

eta

0/2/0

Tet

Cip Lnz Van

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Escherichia coli

ST979

ST2904

4/2/2

ST4349 0/0/1

ST537

0/1/0

0/0/1

ST131

ST1978

ST10 ST1547

4/0/0

ST2660 0/0/1

1/0/0

ST58

ST59 1/0/0

7/2/0

M AN U

ST57

0/0/2

0/0/1

ST393

SC

1/0/0

ST375 1/0/0

1/0/0

ST95

ST538

0/0/1

RI PT

ST69

2/0/1

ST3570 0/0/1

0% <50% >50% 100%

TE D

1/0/1

Fecal samples during NICU stance Milk samples

AC C

EP

Fecal samples at 2 years

ST57 ST58 ST59 ST69 ST95 ST375 ST393 ST538 ST1547 ST1978 ST2904

Antibiotic susceptibility Phylogroup B2 B1/B2 D D B2 B2 D D B2 B2 B2

Amp Cef

Imi

Gen Tet

Cip

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Klebsiella pneumoniae

ST45

ST35

1/2/0

ST1573

1/1/1

ST1572

ST25

0/1/0

1/0/0

1/0/0

RI PT

ST1486

ST1574

1/0/0

ST505

ST29

M AN U

ST1547

SC

1/1/0

0/1/0

2/0/0

ST641

ST252 ST70 0/1/0

TE D

2/1/1

Fecal samples during NICU stance Milk samples

7/3/0

EP

4/4/0

Fecal samples at 2 years

Antibiotic susceptibility

Amp

Imi

Gen

T et

Cip

AC C

ST25 ST29 ST35 ST45 ST 70 ST 242 ST 505 ST 641 ST1486 ST1547 ST 1572 ST 1573 ST 1574

Cef

0% <50% >50% 100%

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

Figure 2. Summary of the genetic diversity, antibiotic resistance profiles and virulence factors obtained for the different bacterial species. The upper part of the figure represents the genetic diversity obtained by MLST and using the minimum spanning tree algorithm. Each circle represents a MLST clone; its size depends on the number of isolates in that group and its clone number is indicated above the circle, whereas the number below indicates its frequency per origin (feces during NICU stay, milk samples or feces at 2 years). Clones considered as high-risk clones are marked in bold. STs that are genetically related are connected by black lines when they are strongly related and grey when the relation is weak. The antibiotic susceptibility of each clone is represented at the bottom of the figure. For this purpose all isolates belonging to the same ST were grouped, and the antibiotic resistances are represented in function of their frequency (see legend). The same scheme was followed to describe the virulence genes carriage for the gram-positive isolates.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

October

November

December

January

April

May

June E. faecalis

E. faecium S. aureus

E. coli

K. pneumoniae

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

ST 18 ST 765 ST 132 ST 1490 ST 8 ST 30 ST 378 ST 34 ST 45 ST 121 ST 95 ST 69 ST 393 ST 59 ST 538 ST 1978 ST 1547 ST 58 ST 2904 ST 375 ST 1574 ST 641 ST 70 ST 1573 ST 252 ST 29 ST 25 ST 505 ST 1547 ST 45 ST 35 ST 1572

March

RI PT

ST 81 ST 34 ST 64 ST 21 ST 30 ST 40 ST 56 ST 16

February

Figure 3. Persistence and frequency of the different ST detected during the studied period in the NICU. The E. faecalis ST64 and ST40 persistent clones are marked.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

SC M AN U TE D

Actinobacteria

Bacilli

Bacteroidetes

Gammaproteobacteria

EP AC C

Bifidobacterium breve Bifidobacterium longum Corynebacterium sp. Dermabacter hominis Microbacterium oxydans Micrococcus luteus Rothia dentocariosa Bacillus sp. Enterococcus faecalis Enterococcus faecium Lactobacillus casei Lactobacillus fermentum Lactobacillus gasseri Lactobacillus salivarius Lactococcus lactis Leuconostoc citreum Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcus epidermidis Other Staphylococcus Streptococcus agalactiae Streptococcus mitis Other Streptococcus Bacteroides fragilis Citrobacter sp. Enterobacter cancerogenus Enterobacter cloacae Enterobacter hormaechei Erwinia persicina Escherichia coli Escherichia fergusonii Klebsiella granulomatis Klebsiella oxytoca Klebsiella pneumoniae Klebsiella sp. Klebsiella variicola Morganella morganii Pantoea dispersa Proteus penneri Proteus sp. Proteus mirabilis Proteus vulgaris Pseudomonas fluorescens Other Pseudomonas Serratia marcescens Serratia nematodiphila Serratia ureilytica Shigella sp. Shigella dysenteriae Other Shigella Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Veillonella parvula Yeast

RI PT

0 7 14 21 0 7 14 21 28 42 0 7 14 21 28 35 42 56 0 7 14 21 0 7 14 21 0 14 21 28 35 49 63 70-84 0 7 14 21 28 35 49 63 0 7 14 21 28 35 56 84 7 14 21 28 42 56 77-210 0 14 0 7 14 21 14 21 7 14 21 42

1

Negativicutes

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

SC M AN U TE D

Actinobacteria

Bacilli

Bacteroidetes

Gammaproteobacteria

EP AC C

Bifidobacterium breve Bifidobacterium longum Corynebacterium sp. Dermabacter hominis Microbacterium oxydans Micrococcus luteus Rothia dentocariosa Bacillus sp. Enterococcus faecalis Enterococcus faecium Lactobacillus casei Lactobacillus fermentum Lactobacillus gasseri Lactobacillus salivarius Lactococcus lactis Leuconostoc citreum Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcus epidermidis Other Staphylococcus Streptococcus agalactiae Streptococcus mitis Other Streptococcus Bacteroides fragilis Citrobacter sp. Enterobacter cancerogenus Enterobacter cloacae Enterobacter hormaechei Erwinia persicina Escherichia coli Escherichia fergusonii Klebsiella granulomatis Klebsiella oxytoca Klebsiella pneumoniae Klebsiella sp. Klebsiella variicola Morganella morganii Pantoea dispersa Proteus penneri Proteus sp. Proteus mirabilis Proteus vulgaris Pseudomonas fluorescens Other Pseudomonas Serratia marcescens Serratia nematodiphila Serratia ureilytica Shigella sp. Shigella dysenteriae Other Shigella Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Veillonella parvula Yeast

RI PT

0 7 14 21 49 63 84-98 0 7 14 21 28 7 14 21 49 63 70-98 7 14 21 28 35 49 84-126 14 21 35 49 70 0 7 14 21 0 7 14 28 35 56 0 7 14 21 49 63 14 21 28 42 56 70 0 14 21 49 63 14 21 35 49 7 21 21 28

14

Supplementary Figure 1. Detection of minority species in each infant and sample.

Negativicutes