Prevalence and Impact of Postoperative Headaches in Nonfunctioning Pituitary Macroadenoma Patients: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

Prevalence and Impact of Postoperative Headaches in Nonfunctioning Pituitary Macroadenoma Patients: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

Journal Pre-proof Prevalence and Impact of Postoperative Headaches in Nonfunctioning Pituitary Macroadenoma Patients: A Longitudinal Cohort Study Min ...

3MB Sizes 0 Downloads 47 Views

Journal Pre-proof Prevalence and Impact of Postoperative Headaches in Nonfunctioning Pituitary Macroadenoma Patients: A Longitudinal Cohort Study Min Kyeong Jang, Ph.D., KOAPN, RN, Chang Gi Park, Ph.D, Seonguk Jang, BBA, BS, Eui Hyun Kim, Ph.D., M.D. PII:

S1878-8750(19)32565-3

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.123

Reference:

WNEU 13423

To appear in:

World Neurosurgery

Received Date: 26 July 2019 Revised Date:

21 September 2019

Accepted Date: 23 September 2019

Please cite this article as: Jang MK, Park CG, Jang S, Kim EH, Prevalence and Impact of Postoperative Headaches in Nonfunctioning Pituitary Macroadenoma Patients: A Longitudinal Cohort Study, World Neurosurgery (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.123. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Prevalence and Impact of Postoperative Headaches in Nonfunctioning Pituitary Macroadenoma Patients: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

Min Kyeong Jang1,2, Ph.D., KOAPN, RN, Chang Gi Park2, Ph.D., Seonguk Jang3, BBA, BS, and Eui Hyun Kim4,5,6, Ph.D., M.D. 1

University of Illinois Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA; 2University of Illinois at Chicago,

College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA; 3University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; 5Pituitary Tumor Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; 6Yonsei Endocrine Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Funding: This work was supported by the National Institute of Nursing Research of the National Institutes of Health (K24NR015340); and the Basic Science Research Program through the NRF of Korea (NRF-2018R1C1B5042687) funded by the Korean Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Correspondence: Eui Hyun Kim, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-2-2228-2155

Fax: +82-2-393-9979

E-mail: [email protected]

Key words: Headache, Pituitary adenoma, Transsphenoidal surgery

Running title: Postoperative Headaches as a Predictor

Postoperative Headaches as a Predictor

1

Prevalence and Impact of Postoperative Headaches in Nonfunctioning

2

Pituitary Macroadenoma Patients: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

3 4

Abstract

5

BACKGROUND: Patients with nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas commonly experience

6

headaches before and after surgery, and headaches have been reported to significantly detract

7

from the quality of life. Despite this adverse impact, few studies have examined the prevalence

8

and pattern of headaches on a long-term basis. Thus, this study employed a longitudinal cohort

9

design to identify headache prevalence and severity during a 6-month postoperative period and

10

its predictors.

11

METHODS: Forty patients with nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas who underwent

12

transsphenoidal surgery were enrolled as subjects, and Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) was

13

performed at four time points: before and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery.

14

RESULTS: This study revealed that nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenoma patients suffered

15

from headaches at each of the four time points and that 37.5%, 27.8%, 17.9%, and 12.8% of the

16

patients experienced “substantial and severe impact headaches” before and 1, 3, and 6 months

17

after surgery, respectively. In addition, total HIT-6 scores 1 month after surgery were a

18

significant predictor (B = 0.41, p < 0.001) of headaches 3 and 6 months after surgery. Among the

19

HIT-6 items, pain (B = 0.09, p < 0.001), cognitive function (B = 0.07, p < 0.001), and

20

psychological distress (B = 0.07, p < 0.001) showed the greatest impact on long-term headaches.

21

CONCLUSION: Headaches adversely affected patients even 6 months after surgery.

22

Additionally, headaches 1 month after surgery predicted the prevalence of long-term headaches

23

at 3 and 6 months, demonstrating the importance of timely postsurgical measurement of

24

headaches to anticipate patients’ long-term headache patterns.

1

Postoperative Headaches as a Predictor

25

INTRODUCTION

26

Headaches are one of the most common symptoms experienced by pituitary adenoma patients

27

and have been reported in more than one-third of individuals during the treatment period.1

28

Nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma patients inevitably undergo transsphenoidal surgery as a

29

mainstay of the treatment options,2,3 often resulting in long-term headaches after surgery.4-6 One

30

prospective study reported that almost 50% of pituitary adenoma patients experienced

31

preoperative headaches6, and although headaches decreased after surgery in a significant number

32

of patients, almost 30% of the patients still experienced headaches 6 months post-surgery.

33

Similarly, another longitudinal cohort study reported that 63% of patients experienced headaches

34

before surgery and that 19% showed no improvement in headaches 3 months after surgery.5 Thus,

35

although transsphenoidal surgery results in tumor removal and contributes to headache relief,5-7

36

headaches remain an issue that adversely impacts some patients after surgery.8

37

Previous studies have identified various risk factors for headaches in pituitary adenoma

38

patients. For example, reported risk factors include adenoma size, sinus invasion, hormonal

39

effects, adenoma type, family history of headaches, intrasellar pressure (ISP), and intracranial

40

pain-sensitive structure displacement.1,4,9,10 In addition, one study found that tumor-attributed

41

headaches were associated with a history of headaches, nicotine abuse, taking acute-headache

42

medication, and higher tumor proliferation (reflected by a Ki67-LI >3%).11 Although migraine-

43

like headaches are a common clinical manifestation in patients with nonfunctioning pituitary

44

macroadenomas,10 headache types and locations vary.12 On the whole, the association between

45

pituitary adenoma and headaches is not well understood due to inconsistencies in previous

46

research findings.13 Furthermore, in their recent review article, Donovan and Welch12 noted that

47

the literature on headaches in pituitary adenoma patients was limited to only a few prospective

48

studies that focused on this topic. Although two previous longitudinal studies focused on

49

headache symptoms, these studies addressed many types of pituitary adenomas, and thus the

50

prevalence and pattern of headaches in nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenoma patients were not

51

specifically examined. In the clinical setting, healthcare providers encounter various headache

52

trajectories and require guidance regarding the appropriate times for headache assessment.

53

Considering that headaches adversely affect the quality of life (QOL) and daily life activities of

54

patients,6,14 proper assessment and management of headache symptoms are crucial to streamline 2

Postoperative Headaches as a Predictor

55

the course of treatment. Thus, a longitudinal cohort study is needed to focus on postsurgical

56

measurement of headaches.

57

Although clinics recommend that patients with nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas

58

have regular follow-up tests before and after surgery, including magnetic resonance imaging

59

(MRI), Humphrey Visual Field testing, and hormone tests, headache assessments tend to be

60

overlooked as part of routine care. Reflecting this lack of attention to headaches both in the clinic

61

and in research, no guidelines are currently available that specify when and how to assess

62

patients for headache symptoms. To help fill this research gap with respect to headaches in

63

patients with nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas and to provide information for such

64

guidelines, this study employed a longitudinal cohort design to identify the pattern and severity

65

of headaches in such patients and determine the best measurement time points for predicting

66

long-term headaches.

67 68

METHODS

69

Study Participants and Data Collection

70

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (approval #2013-0494) of

71

the Yonsei University Health System, Severance Hospital, in Republic of Korea. We recruited 40

72

patients diagnosed with nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenoma who were scheduled to undergo

73

transsphenoidal surgery from June 2013 through February 2014. Written informed consent was

74

obtained from all participants.

75

In this longitudinal study, each participant met the following inclusion criteria: each

76

patient had to (1) be more than 20 years of age, (2) have been diagnosed by MRI with a

77

macroadenoma with a diameter greater than 2 cm, (3) not have been indicated for medical

78

treatment (for endocrine-inactive pituitary adenomas), (4) be scheduled to undergo

79

transsphenoidal surgery, and (5) be able to understand and respond to the study survey. The

80

number of subjects for this study was estimated to be 40 for a generalized estimating equation

81

(GEE) analysis with an assumption of effect size of 0.23, power of 0.8, and alpha as 0.05.

82

For data collection, the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) was administered to the

83

participants in an outpatient setting at four time points: preoperatively (40 participants) and

84

postoperatively at 1 (36), 3 (39), and 6 months (39). In addition, the participants’ charts were 3

Postoperative Headaches as a Predictor

85

reviewed to identify their general and clinical characteristics.

86

All patients underwent preoperative dynamic MRI of the sellar region using a 3.0-Tesla

87

system (Achieva; Philips, Best, The Netherlands). Tumor size was measured as a maximal

88

diameter on a coronal plane. Immediate postoperative 3-Tesla diagnostic MRI was performed

89

within 48 h after the surgery and the extent of tumor removal was determined. The

90

endocrinological assessment with combined pituitary function test (CPFT) was fully described in

91

our previous report.15 The CPFT was performed to evaluate anterior pituitary function before

92

surgery and 6 months after surgery, and the results were confirmed by two endocrinologists.

93

Patient visual field was evaluated by standard automated perimetry using a Humphrey Visual

94

Field Analyzer (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Germany). Olfactory function was measured by the

95

Korean version of Sniffin’ Sticks (KVSS).

96 97

Measure

98

The HIT-6 developed by Kosinski et al (2003)16 and translated by Chu et al. (2008)17

99

was used to measure the impact of headaches on the participants. The scale employs six items to

100

assess headache complexity by addressing pain, social function, role function, cognitive function,

101

psychological distress, and vitality. Each item is scored from 6 to 13, and total scores range from

102

36 to 78. Total scores fall into four categories: little to no impact headaches (36-49), some impact

103

headaches (50-55), substantial impact headaches (56-59), and severe impact headaches (60-78).

104

The total score indicates the effect that the headaches have on normal daily life and the ability to

105

function.

106 107

Statistical Analysis

108

Both general and clinical participant characteristics as well as the prevalence and

109

severity of the participants’ headaches were analyzed using a descriptive statistical method. To

110

enrich unbiased estimation of population-averaged regression coefficients, GEEs were used to

111

analyze the longitudinal headache data. During the study, a small number of participants failed to

112

contribute data during various postsurgical time points. However, the quantity of missing data

113

was below 5%, so a missing data approach was not employed. All statistical analyses were

114

performed using SPSS version 24.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All statistical tests were two4

Postoperative Headaches as a Predictor

115

tailed, and p < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant result.

116

RESULTS

117

General and Clinical Characteristics

118

Participant demographics and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1 and

119

Table 2, respectively. The 40 nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenoma patients consisted of 19

120

males (47.5%) and 21 females (52.5%) with a mean age of 52 years; ages ranged from 22 to 77

121

years. The mean tumor size was 3.2 cm (range, 2.0–6.4 cm). Of the participants, 29 (72.5%)

122

underwent total resection of the tumors, and 11 (27.5%) underwent subtotal resection.

123

Furthermore, 17 (42.5%) of the participants required hormone replacement therapy after surgery

124

and eventually during the follow-up period. Anterior pituitary function was assessed in 29

125

patients in whom comparisons between their preoperative and 6-month postoperative CPFT data

126

were available. At least one axis of anterior pituitary hormones showed preoperative or

127

postoperative hypopituitarism in 27 (67.5%) and 23 (57.5%) of the participants, respectively.

128

Anterior pituitary function worsened in 8 (27.6%), improved in 11 (37.9%), and did not change

129

in 10 of the patients (34.5%).

130 131

Headache Prevalence and Severity

132

With respect to total HIT-6 scores, headaches 1 month after surgery showed the highest

133

score (47.19 ± 9.16), with scores ranging from 36 to 74. Whereas headaches 6 months after

134

surgery showed the lowest score (40.95 ± 7.55), with scores ranging from 36 to 64. Before

135

surgery, the mean headache score was 46.85 ± 8.98, and scores ranged from 36 to 65; whereas 3

136

months after surgery, the mean headache score was 43.44 ± 6.77, and scores ranged from 36 to

137

58. Among the HIT-6 items, “pain” had the highest score at all time points over the 6 month

138

duration. “Vitality” had the lowest scores before surgery and 3 months after surgery; whereas

139

“cognitive function” had the lowest scores 1 and 6 months after surgery. The total HIT-6 scores

140

of all the participants across all time points fell into the “little to no impact headache” category.

141

However, in the HIT-6 impact categories (Fig. 1), 15 (37.5%), 10 (27.8%), 7 (17.9%), and 5

142

(12.8%) of the participants reported moderate, substantial, or severe impact headaches before

143

surgery and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, respectively.

144

Table 3 shows the change in headache patterns between before surgery and 1 month after 5

Postoperative Headaches as a Predictor

145

surgery and between the 1 month after surgery and 6 months after surgery. These comparisons

146

were based on the responses for patients who had no missing data in the three follow-up

147

timepoint tests. Among 35 total participants, the level of headaches in 10 participants (28.6%)

148

decreased 1 month after surgery compared to before surgery. Among 10 participants, 9

149

participants (90%) did not require hormonal replacement after surgery and 6 participants (60%)

150

had no comorbidities. On the contrary, the level of headaches in 7 participants (20.0%) increased

151

1 month after surgery compared to before surgery. Among these 7 participants, 6 participants

152

reported to have “little to no impact headache” in the preoperative period, thus these cases were

153

regarded as new headaches. Furthermore, 5 of these 7 participants (71.4%) underwent subtotal

154

resection surgery, and 4 (57.1%) required hormone replacement therapy. For these 35

155

participants, the size of the tumor, presence of cavernous sinus invasion, extent of tumor

156

resection, changes in visual field, presence of postoperative hyposmia, presence of preoperative

157

hypopituitarism, and outcome of pituitary hormonal function were not associated with HIT-6

158

scores or its changes during the first 6 months.

159 160

Longitudinal Headache Prediction Model

161

Table 4 summarizes the GEE analysis results. Controlling for general and clinical

162

participant characteristics, the total HIT-6 score at 1 month after surgery was a significant

163

predictor of headaches 3 and 6 months after surgery (B = 0.41, p < 0.001). In addition, each HIT-

164

6 item score was found to significantly predict long-term headaches. Specifically, the strongest

165

predictors of long-term headaches were “pain” (B = 0.09, p < 0.001), “cognitive function” (B =

166

0.07, p < 0.001), and “psychological distress” (B = 0.07, p < 0.001), whereas “social function”

167

(B = 0.07, p < 0.01) was the weakest predictor. The total HIT-6 score 1 month after surgery

168

remained a significant predictor of long-term headaches (p < 0.05) when we did not control for

169

participant characteristics, but the p-value indicated less significance than when we adjusted for

170

these characteristics.

171 172

DISCUSSION

173

This study identified the importance of measuring headaches 1 month after surgery as a

174

predictor for long-term headaches and a basis for quality care. In our study findings, the total 6

Postoperative Headaches as a Predictor

175

HIT-6 score did not impact “substantial and severe impact headaches” at each time point because

176

each of the mean values of the total HIT-6 score tended to belong to the “little impact or no

177

impact headaches” range of scores. However, in Figure 1, “substantial and severe impact

178

headache” scores were 37.5%, 27.8%, 17.9%, and 12.8%, before surgery and 1, 3, and 6 months

179

after surgery, respectively. In other words, headaches are the common symptom of

180

nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenoma during the treatment process, and transsphenoidal

181

surgery did not guarantee total resolution of the headache symptoms. Similar to our findings,

182

other longitudinal studies have also reported that 20–30% of pituitary adenoma patients still

183

suffer from headaches, and therefore headaches remain an essential issue.5,6 Headaches are a

184

significant symptom for pituitary adenoma patients before surgery (p < 0.001), and chronic

185

headaches are more prevalent for these patients when compared to the general population (p =

186

0.001).2 Therefore, healthcare providers recognize that headaches associated with pituitary

187

adenoma are a common long-term issue, and the prevalence and severity of the headaches are

188

still an important consideration during the treatment process.

189

Postoperative headaches are simply regarded as a surgical procedure-related symptom;

190

however, headache mechanisms derived from the pituitary adenoma are complicated and not

191

well understood. Indeed, it has been reported that transsphenoidal surgery is not guaranteed to

192

positively influence headache symptoms for a certain period of time after surgery.1,18 In our

193

findings, 7 participants (20%) experienced an increased level of headaches 1 month after surgery

194

compared to the preoperative period. Among these participants, 5 (71.4%) underwent subtotal

195

resection surgery and 4 (57.1%) experienced hormonal deficiency after surgery. In contrast, for

196

other 10 participants who experienced decreased headache symptoms after surgery, 5 (50%)

197

underwent total resection surgery, and 9 (90%) had no hormonal deficiency after surgery. Based

198

on these findings, both hormonal sufficiency or deficiency and extent of tumor resection may be

199

predictors of headache relief or severity after surgery. Pathophysiology of headache in pituitary

200

adenoma includes various mechanical, biochemical, vascular, and biopsychosocial mechanisms.

201

In addition, tumor size is known as an important pathophysiological cause of headaches.1 In

202

other words, pituitary tumor size, or the “mass effect,” can lead to increased ISP. A previous

203

study reported that patients with headaches were more likely to have higher ISP levels compared

204

to patients without headaches, and those symptoms were related to intratumoral hemorrhage and 7

Postoperative Headaches as a Predictor

205

compromised dural integrity at the sella.18 In cases of postsurgical pituitary tumors and

206

headaches, residual tumors in the cavernous sinus and endocrine imbalances may increase the

207

headache symptoms, so optimal management strategies are consistently required after surgery.13

208

Therefore, future studies need to comprehensively investigate the risk factors and epidemiology

209

of headaches, including comparison of headache patterns before and after surgery.

210

Furthermore, this study contributed to the understanding that the presence of headaches

211

1 month after surgery was a significant predictive factor for headaches 3 and 6 months after

212

surgery when controlling for all general and clinical patient characteristics. This phenomenon

213

shows the importance of screening for headaches 1 month after surgery as an indicator for long-

214

term headaches. Also, there was substantial variation in headache scores, which ranged from 36

215

to 74 1 month after surgery. The prevalence of postoperative headaches suggests that measures

216

should be taken to successfully address and manage headaches 1 month after surgery in an

217

outpatient setting. Considering that headaches are a signature factor affecting QOL, health

218

providers cannot overlook the importance when patients return to their general lives. In addition,

219

although the main symptoms reported by patients with nonfunctioning primary adenoma are

220

headaches, visual deterioration, and hypopituitarism, inpatient and outpatients assessments

221

regularly include MRI, Humphrey visual field, and hormonal tests; headache assessments are

222

noticeably absent. Because headaches are a subjective symptom, they are neglected because of

223

the difficulty to objectively measure and complex causality. However, regular assessment and

224

management of headaches 1 month after surgery should be considered using pharmacological

225

and nonpharmacological approaches. Our findings suggest that timely, appropriate assessment

226

and efficient management may help treat headache symptoms and improve patient QOL.

227

Although preoperative headaches are a common symptom of pituitary adenomas and one of the

228

surgical indications, patients should be informed that they may experience headaches for a

229

certain period of time after surgery and should consult a physician for appropriate management.

230

If patient headaches persist 1 month after surgery, proper professional medical intervention with

231

regular monitoring should be provided because they have a higher chance of long-term

232

headaches. Whether medical intervention can decrease the probability of long-term headaches

233

should be further investigated.

234

In our research phase, we realized that a disease-specific headaches as an instrument for 8

Postoperative Headaches as a Predictor

235

pituitary adenoma patients should be developed by incorporating systematic review of headache

236

risk factors. Although HIT-6 is a validated instrument used to assess headaches and the impact on

237

daily function for patients with primary adenoma, items on the HIT-6 cover broader concepts to

238

assess headache impact rather than an in-depth assessment of headaches for pituitary adenoma.

239

Specifically, known risk factors for headaches in patients with pituitary adenoma are tumor size,

240

sinus invasion, hormone unbalance, and headache history; however, these risk factors are not

241

assessed as part of the HIT-6 instrument. Thus, it would be beneficial for future studies and

242

clinical assessments to develop a new evidence-based and disease-specific instrument that

243

includes more objective risk factors for pituitary adenoma. The new headache assessment could

244

be an essential instrument for assessing symptoms for patients with pituitary adenoma to

245

efficiently improve quality of care in a neurosurgical clinical setting.

246

Future studies should include broader pituitary adenoma patients and use a disease-

247

specific instrument for headaches. Many healthcare providers tend to overlook headache

248

symptoms due to noticeable neurological symptoms, including visual deterioration and hormonal

249

effects. However, considering that headaches significantly impact QOL, a longitudinal

250

prospective cohort study will be needed to conduct regular and more accurate assessments and to

251

identify effective treatments in the management of headaches. Although the pattern and risk

252

factors for headaches are still unclear and an area of active study in pituitary adenoma, screening

253

for headaches 1 month after surgery should be conducted to prevent chronic headaches and their

254

impact on quality of care in a neurosurgical clinical setting.

255 256

CONCLUSION

257

Although transsphenoidal surgery is the best way to treat and cure nonfunctioning

258

pituitary adenoma, patients still reported headaches as a common symptom after surgery. Our

259

findings indicated that headaches 1 month after surgery could be a predictor for long-term,

260

chronic headaches, and therefore assessment and management of headaches should be regularly

261

applied. This study further suggests that an evidence-based and disease-specific instrument for

262

headache assessment in pituitary adenoma should be systematically developed.

263

9

Postoperative Headaches as a Predictor

264

Figure Legends

265

FIGURE 1. Prevalence and severity of headaches. Headaches worsened after surgery as

266

shown by the highest Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) score 1 month after surgery. Headaches

267

gradually decreased, and HIT-6 scores were lower 6 months after surgery than before surgery.

268

Overall, 37.5%, 27.8%, 17.9%, and 12.8% of the participants reported moderate, substantial, or

269

severe impact headaches before surgery and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, respectively.

10

References 1. Kreitschmann Andermahr I, Siegel S, Weber Carneiro R, Maubach J, Harbeck B, Brabant G. Headache and pituitary disease: A systematic review. Clin Endocrinol(Oxf). 2013;79(6):760-769. 2. Gravdahl GB, Tronvik EA, Fougner SL, Solheim O. Pituitary adenoma and non-acute headache: Is there an association, and does treatment help? World Neurosurg. 2016;92:284-291. 3. Murad MH, Fernández Balsells M, Barwise A, et al. Outcomes of surgical treatment for nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: A systematic review and meta analysis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010;73(6):777-791. 4. Suri H, Dougherty C. Clinical presentation and management of headache in pituitary tumors. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018;22(8):55. 5. Rizzoli P, Iuliano S, Weizenbaum E, Laws E. Headache in patients with pituitary lesions: A longitudinal cohort study. Neurosurgery. 2015;78(3):316-323. 6. Wolf A, Goncalves S, Salehi F, et al. Quantitative evaluation of headache severity before and after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma. J Neurosurg. 2016;124(6):1627-1633. 7. Hayashi Y, Kita D, Iwato M, et al. Significant improvement of intractable headache after transsphenoidal surgery in patients with pituitary adenomas; preoperative neuroradiological evaluation and intraoperative intrasellar pressure measurement. Pituitary. 2016;19(2):175-182. 8. Siegel S, Carneiro RW, Buchfelder M, et al. Presence of headache and headache types in patients with tumors of the sellar region—can surgery solve the problem? results of a prospective single center study. Endocrine. 2017;56(2):325-335. 9. Gondim JA, Almeida JP, de Albuquerque, Lucas Alverne F, Gomes E, Schops M, Ferraz T. Pure endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for treatment of acromegaly: Results of 67 cases treated in a pituitary center. Neurosurgical focus. 2010;29(4):E7. 10. Yu B, Ji N, Ma Y, Yang B, Kang P, Luo F. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for headache associated with non-functioning pituitary adenomas. Cephalalgia. 2017;37(4):348-355. 11. Schankin CJ, Reifferscheid AK, Krumbholz M, et al. Headache in patients with pituitary adenoma: Clinical and paraclinical findings. Cephalalgia. 2012;32(16):1198-1207. 12. Donovan LE, Welch MR. Headaches in patients with pituitary tumors: A clinical conundrum. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018;22(8):57. 13. Levy MJ. The association of pituitary tumors and headache. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2011;11(2):164-170. 14. Pereira-Neto A, Borba AM, Mello PAd, Naves LA, Araújo Jr, Antônio Santos de, Casulari LA. Mean intrasellar pressure, visual field, headache intensity and quality of life of

patients with pituitary adenoma. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2010;68(3):350-354. 15. Lee EJ, Ahn JY, Noh T, Kim SH, Kim TS, Kim SH. Tumor tissue identification in the pseudocapsule of pituitary adenoma: Should the pseudocapsule be removed for total resection of pituitary adenoma? Oper Neurosurg. 2009;64(suppl_1):ONS62-ONS70. 16. Kosinski M, Bayliss M, Bjorner J, et al. A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: The HIT-6™. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(8):963-974. 17. Chu M, Im H, Ju Y, Yu K, Ma H, Lee B. Validity and reliability assessment of Korean headache impact test-6 (HIT-6). J Korean Neurol Assoc. 2008;27(1):1-6. 18. Hayashi Y, Sasagawa Y, Oishi M, et al. Contribution of intrasellar pressure elevation to headache manifestation in pituitary adenoma evaluated with intraoperative pressure measurement. Neurosurgery. 2018;84(3):599-606.

Table 1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

(N=40)

Category Age (years)

Sex

Marital status

Religion

Economic burden

Mean ± SD 51.95 ± 15.10 (range, 22-77)

20-29

3(7.5)

30-39

6(15.0)

40-49

9(22.5)

50-59

7(17.5)

60-69

9(22.5)

70-79

6(15.0)

Male

19(47.5)

Female

21(52.5)

Single

9(22.5)

Married

31(77.5)

None

13(32.5)

Christian

15(37.5)

Buddhist

9(22.5)

Catholic

3(7.5)

Never

23(57.5)

A little

13(32.5)

Very Education

Occupation

Comorbidity

n (%)

4(10.0)

Middle school

12(30.0)

High school

12(30.0)

≥College

16(40.0)

None

13(32.5)

Yes

27(67.5)

None

21(52.5)

Diabetes

2(5.0)

Hypertension

4(10.0)

Others

13(32.5)

SD—Standard Deviation

1

Table 2. General clinical outcomes of 40 patients with nunfunctioning pituitary adenomas Category Extent of resection

Visual field

Subtotal

11 (27.5)

Total

29 (72.5)

Improved (>5dB)

27 (67.5)

Unchanged

13 (32.5)

Worsened (>5dB) Olfaction (n=32) *

Preoperative hypocortisolemia

Anterior pituitary function (n=29) **

Postoperative hormonal replacement

n (%)

0 (0)

Hyposmia

7 (21.9)

Normal

25 (78.1)

Yes

14 (35.0)

No

26 (65.0)

Normal to normal

2 (6.8)

Improved

11 (38.0)

Persisted

8 (27.6)

Aggravated

8 (27.6)

Yes

17 (42.5)

No

23 (57.5)

*Total number of patients in whom Korean version of Sniffin’s Sticks was performed after surgery ** Total number of patients in whom comparison between preoperative and postoperative combined pituitary function test was available

1

Table 3. Postoperative headache during the first 6 months in the patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery for nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas (n=35) Headache

Before surgery

Headache

1 month after surgery

Change

Versus

Change

Versus

1 month after surgery n

Increased

Decreased

No change or no headache

7

10

18

6 month after surgery

%

20.0

28.6

51.4

n

%

Increased

0

0

Decreased

7

20.0

No change

0

0

Increased

1

2.9

Decreased

0

0

No change

9

25.7

Increased

1

2.9

Decreased

1

2.9

No change

16

45.7

Table 4. Estimated effect of postoperative 1 month headache on the following headaches Headache

Headache Impact Test (postoperative 1 month) B

SE

95% CI

Wald X2

p value

.41

.10

.21 to .61

15.72

<.001***

Pain

.09

.02

.05 to .12

19.98

<.001***

Social Functioning

.07

.03

.02 to .12

6.71

.01*

Role Functioning

.06

.02

.02 to .10

8.31

.004**

Cognitive Functioning

.07

.02

.03 to .11

13.90

<.001***

Psychological Distress

.07

.02

.04 to .10

17.35

<.001***

Validity

.06

.02

.02 to .10

9.97

Total HIT-6

CI—Confidence interval; HIT-6—Headache Impact Test-6; SE—Standard Error *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001

1

.002**

Abbreviations List CPFT: Combined Pituitary Function Test GEE: Generalized Estimating Equation HIT-6: Headache Impact Test-6 ISP: IntraSellar Pressure MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging