Proteina~orption on soft contact lenses III.
Much.
E.J. Ciao,
J.L. Koenig,J+M.~der~on* and N. Jenny t
Departments of Macr5m5lacufar Science, Patho/5gy and Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve Untiersity, Ctevefand, Oh/o 4.4 106. USA (Received 2 January 1985; accepted 25 September t985)
Adsorption of bovine submaxillary mucin (BSM) on three different soft contact surfaces, lathe cut (LC) and spin cast (SC) crosslinked poly-Z-hydro~ethylmethac~late and spin cast poly{Z-hydro~ethylmethac~late/methac~lie acid) (PREMISE), was studied. The in vitro process was foflowed by attenuated total reflectance-Fourier t~nsfo~ infrared spectroscopy (ATR-AIR). A three-layer structure is envisaged for the adsorbed BSM: a very thin surface layer of strongly hound and conformationally altered mucin constitutes the surface layer. A random to B-sheet structural transition activated by the hydrogel surface is proposed for this layer. Glycoprotein hydrogen-bonding with the polymer hydroxyls and interaction of charged and hydrophobic groups with hydrogel surfaces are important in stabilizing this layer. Most of the adsorbed BSM (99%) is found in the middle and top layers which are formed by a different degree of associated BSM (their ~onfo~ation is minimally changed or not changed at all, respectively) and are weakly adsorbed to the lens surfaces. Surface morphololgy and chemical composition of the lenses are important adsorption parameters only for the reversibly adsorbed BSM. Keywords: Contact lenses. ATR-FTIR, BSM (bovine submaxillary mucinl, adsorption
The irreversible migration of organic and inorganic molecules from the tear solution to the lens surface is the underlying phenomenon in contact lens spoilage’,‘. Tear proteins usually adsorb firmly to the polymeric surface’*‘. Some mechanisms have been postulated in order to explain this spoiling phenomenon3s4 but none of them have been unequivocally proved. Surface active substances can be used as preventive measures5,6 but only papain or trypsin enzymatic digestion of the adsorbed protein has been of practical use6. Among the tear com~nents, ocular mucin has been found in largeamounts in secretions of contact lens users7**. In fact, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis of ‘in vivo’ spoiled contact lenses have shown that after the insertion of hydrophilic or hydrophobic lenses, substantial mucous coating develops on the anterior lens surface*,‘. Dreyer et a/.“. using SEM and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ESCA) reported that mucopolysacchandes were found on more than 70% of the analysed lenses. Tripathi ef af.” studied more than 300 in viva spoiled soft contact lenses by different analytical techniques. They found a complex mucoprotein-lipid deposit on most of the lenses. It is suggested
*To whom correspondence should be addressed: At the Department of Pathology. ‘At the Department of Pediatrics. Q 1986
6u~e~o~h
EsCo (Publishers) Ltd. 0142-96
12/86/01
that the mucin coating could be an immunological response of the eye to entrap and eventually expel the foreign bodyg. Human ocular mucin (HOM) is usually found at the interface between the tear and the cornea1 epithelium; it is secreted by goblet and non-goblet cells distributed throughout the conjunctiva and spread over the surface of the eye by the action of blinking’** 13. Its main function is to increasethe wettability of the hydrophobic cornea”, 13. Tear film mucin has also been considered to play a role in the maintenance of low su~acetension by masking and removing lipid contaminants which can migrate to the epithelial-tear interface from the outer tear layer14. More recently, a cleaning function by a foreign particle trapping mechanism has also been attributed to HOM’. It has been postulated that contrary to the ordinary belief of the harmful effects of the adsorption of proteins onto the contact lens, a selective weak adsorption of the mucin should occur in order to assure lens biocompatibility’ 5_ Recently, Proust and coworkers’” studied bovine submaxillary mucin (BSM) adsorbed on surface-oxidized polyethylene films; its amount increasing with the degree of polymer oxidation. They also found a loosely bound adsorbed mucin layer. The same group also studied BSM adsorption on silicone lenses grafted with poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP)17. Similar results were obtained: the amount of
~OS-08$03.00 Bi5material.s f986,
Val 7 January
9
Adsorption on soft contact lenses: E.J. Castiflo at al.
adsorbed mucin was proportional to the PVP content. These findings indicate that the polymer hydrophilicity may play a role in the mucin adsorption process. There is no reported data about the conformational state of adsorbed giycoproteins. It has been argued that because they have higher solubility and stability than simple proteins, no denaturation would be expected for the mucins at inte~a~es18, Previous work’Q-2’ has shown the feasibili~ of using the ATR-FTIR technique to study protein conformations after adsorption on hydrogel surfaces. In vitro tear protein experiments20~2r have shown that both serum albumin and lysozyme adsorb irreversibly on soft contact lenses by changing their con~guration. An altered structure has been detected for both proteins; this is reflected by increases of the @-sheet proportion, and participation of the charged and hydrophobic side chain residues. The structural changes observed are similar to those experienced after heat denaturatior?*~*‘. The purpose of the present investigation is toelucidate the role of mucin as a component of the protein layer adsorbed to soft contact lenses and determine the importance of the hydrophili~i~ and the surface quality of the hydrogel as controlling parameters in the BSM adsorption. Due tothe lack of purified and well identified HOM, this work was carried out with ESM which had been functionally compared to HOM, as a macromolecular lachrymal surfactant22, and was better characterized than HOM23-26.
The instrumental conditions and the protein adsorption procedure has been described elsewhere20’2’. Neve~heless for the sake of clarity, some details will be given here. BSM was purified according to the procedure of Nisizawa and Pigman and purchased from Sigma Labs (St Louis, MO). Porcine submaxillary mucin (PSM) was kindly provided by Dr Neil Jentoft. For the PSM sample a purification procedure described by DeSalegui and Plonska*’ was followed. The BSM was dissolved (0.8 mg/cc) in phosphate buffer solution (PBS), pH 7.3T3 and adsorbed for different periods of time on soft contact lenses of the PHEMA type. Desorption studies werecarried out by immersing the lenses in static PBS solutions. The soft contact lenses were provided by the National Patent Development Corp. (New 8runswi~k, NJ). Internal reflection spectra were obtained from a Digilab FTS-20 FTIR spe~trophotometerwitha Wilks ATR attachment. A Ge crystal of 60” incidence angle was used. For the transmission spectra, powdered samples were diluted in KBr. BSM (0.01 %) in buffer solutions was analysed in a sp~tro~larimeterJASCO-40 to obtain the circular dichroism (CD) spectra. Quartz ceils with 1 cm of pathlength were used. The machine was calibrated with samples of d-10 camphor-sulphonic acid.
RESULTS AND DlSCUSSlON Figure f shows the transmission i.r. spectra of two types of mucin i.e. BSM and PSM. The positions of the major bands suggest different features in their structure. Amide I, II and Ill bands appear at 1657, 1645 and 1242 cm-’ respectively for BSM. Similar bands for PSM are found at 1650, 1549 and 1236 cm-‘. There is also a major spectral difference in the carbohydrate region as denoted by the
10
~iomate~~/s
1986, Vol 7 Jenuary
0
Figure I l.r. spectra of much powders extracted from different sour&es. Bottom: bovine submaxillary much. Top: porcine submaxillary much.
intensity of the complex band centred at 1100 cm-’ for the BSM spectrum. Hence, compositional and structural differences exist be~een the two mucins. Reported data ‘a* 2s shows that both PSM and BSM are basically constituted by the same type and relatively the same proportions of amino acids (serine, threon~ne, glutamic acid, glycine and valine). Although, the arrangement of the components obviously influences the structure of the glycoprotein molecule, we speculate that the spectral differences are mainly produced by the different isolation and purification methods. Sugar microheter~enei~ is usually found for mucins from different sources’*. Supporting this point of view, our BSM spectra show some differences with respect to the spectrum of BSM obtained by a different method and reported some years ago25z2Q. A 1725 cm-’ peak present in that BSM spectra and due too-acetyl groups of the sialic acid, a major carbohydrate component, is detected only as a shoulder in Figure t. figure 2 shows BSM spectra in PBS buffer and in the solid state. After its dissolution, the positions of the amide I and II bands change in the usual fashion found for serum albumin, lysozyme and ~-globulin20,z~~3s: (i) shifting of the amide I and II bands in opposite directions, and (ii) sharpening of both bands. Sugar bands experience a significant decrease and the s(CH,) backbone vibration also shifts from 1448 to 1458 cm-‘. These changes indicate different conformations in the solid and solution state. The observed shifts of the amide I band from 1657 to 1653cm-’ and for the amide II band from 1545 to 1548 cm-’ may not be due to a definite conformational change from one type of secondary structure to another, but
Adsorption on soft contact lenses: E.J. Castillo et a/.
Table 1
Amide I and II shifts for different proteins after dissolution’
Protein
(KBr )
II band
: 0
in detecting states.
the spectroscopic be sensitive the
800
smaller
dihedral
Figure 2 1.r. spectral comparison of bovine submaxillary mucin (BSMJ in two different states. Top: transmission spectrum of BSM powder. Bottom: ATR spectrum of a buffer solution of BSM after digital subtraction of the buffer ATR spectrum.
rather reflect
changes
bonding
of the glycoprotein
charged
groups;
chain
in: (1) the degree backbone3’;
(2) the ionization
complete
bonding of this
perhaps
could
or (3) internalization
of hydrophobic
of
side-
from the solid to the solution
state can be correlated
amount
of p-sheet
and a-helices
Figure
3
the
shows
lysozyme2’,
y-globulin3’,
P-lactoglobulin3’.
found when
factor
I.r. bands ational band
states results
bending
shows
a straight
assigned from
(60%)
and
shifting
It is observed
of 0.95
ordered
However,
albuminzO,
position
while
different
bond
will
have
leading
to a
will be formed3’. is that
structure.
An important the
low a-helix
random
content
this high P-sheet
P-sheet
and a
content
II shift.
of BSM
Using
8
conse-
bands
has a hrgh proportion (Figure
thee Greenfield
conformational
45%
strained
water-protein
chain stresses
The CD spectra
P-sheet,
of the amide
and
of the conformational
BSM
the
Apparently
produce
from the amide
position
no major
and
composition
structure
and
of 4) of
7% a-
has been found for PSM34.
content
I peak which
does not agree with the denotes
that the higher
ribonuclease3’
that
a larger
shift
is
in the protein.
line was fitted for the data and a
to the different
protein
absorptions3’. of
stretching
and in-plane
that the amide
helix. Similar
procedures
in solution
band will
distance,
was obtained.
I band involves C=O
(10%)
with the structure.
for
is detected
a combination C-N
protein
haemoglobin3’,
are not ‘pure’
while the amide stretching
II
a larger 6 contribution
As a first approach correlation
amide
in the
arise from
however
protein-protein
approach33,
is: 48%
to different
in the solid state
phenomenon
reveal BSM
due
the a-helices
arrangement;
be predicted
structure.
little
46 50 90
distinguish
relieves the internal
‘unordered’ Fasman
of the amide II band
that
15 10 5
in the C = 0 bond distance.
more regular structure
indicates
residues. It should be noted that the shifting
and
of hydrogen
than
atomic
is expected
quence
2
differences
dissolution
angles
The frequency might
will
the drying and lyophilization hydrogen
10 22
in the inter-atomic
after
stiff C-N-H
The
changes
sensitivity
absorption
Therefore,
layers.
Wavenumbers
75 28 55
nature of each band. A stretching
angles.
change 1200
B-Sheet (%)
-1
structural Such
to changes
bending
more 1600
6 2 8 7 10 13 20
3 1 0
*Band shifts are expressed in cm
aggregation
2000
Amide II shift a-Helix (%)
1
Haemoglobin3’ Lysozyme3g Albumin3’ Albumln3’ Ribonuclease” B_Lacto910bulin3’ y-Globul,n3’ SOLID
I shift
Amide
The
the
(40%)
amide
in-plane
II
N-H
contributions,
stretching
N-H bending
conform-
(80%),
C-N
0
(1 O%)32. Tab/e 7
I band is not as sensitive
as the amide
4
6 0
20
I
I
I
40
60
80 I
% P-Sheet Figure 3 Correlation of the shifting of the amide II band for the solid statesolution state transition with the b-sheet content for different types of proteins.
240
220 Wavelength Figure 4
(nm)
CD spectrum of bovine submaxillary mucin in buffer solution.
Biometerials
1986, Vol 7 January
11
Adsorption on soft contact lenses: E.J. Castillo et al.
proportion will be given by a random structure. If Figure 3 is utilized to calculate the percentage of P-sheet present in the mucin structure, the contribution of each component is as follows: 7% a-helix, 3% P-sheet, and 90% random. When BSM is adsorbed on hydrophilic surfaces an altered i.r. spectrum is obtained. Figures 5 and 6 show the spectra of the adsorbed glycoprotein on lathe cut (LC) and spin cast (SC) PHEMA soft contact lenses after different periods of adsorption and followed by 1 min rinsing instatic PBS. A splitting of the amide II band,from a single peak in the solution spectrumat 1549 cm-’ to 1554and 1530 cm-’ is found at short adsorption times; this band splitting is less noticeable at longer adsorption times. The amide I band experiences two changes: (a) shoulders appear at 1672 and 1636cm-’ (b road ening) and (b) peak maxima shift from 1653 to 1649 cm-‘. These spectral changes indicate that the structure of the adsorbed glycoprotein is different from that present either in solution or in the solid state. The shape
U
I
I
10
1
1400
G 1000
a
Wavenumbers Figure 5 AT??-IR spectra of adsorbed bovine submaxillary mucin on lathe cut PHEMA lens surfaces for different periods of time followed by 1 min of rinsing in buffer solution.
1651 fi
1549
and position of theamide I and II bands suggestan increased amount of p-sheet content for the adsorbed BSM. A random to P-sheet transition is suggested for the adsorbed glycoprotein because of the above CD and i.r. conformational data. Similar changes in the spectra are found when BSM adsorbs to a chemically different hydrophilic surface. Figure 7 shows the spectra of the glycoprotein adsorbed on PHEMA/MAA: amide I broadening and appearance of shoulders on the amide I band are observed. Nevertheless spectral changes after the short-time are not as conspicuous as in the case of the SC and LC PHEMA surfaces. As will be described later, PHEMA/MAA lenses adsorbed rapidly increased amounts of reversibly desorbed BSM masking conformational changes in the spectra. A growing band at 1336 cm-’ (Figure 7) is a significant difference from the spectra of BSM adsorbed on PHEMA. This peak is assigned to the C-OH vibration from the sugar moieties35; the appearance of this band may be due to the interaction of the -COOH groups of the methacrylic acid with the attached sugar molecules of the BSM. From Figures 5-7, it is evident that the observed spectral changes are a function of the adsorption time or more correctly, a function of the amount of BSM present on the lenses. Splitting of the amide II band, broadening and appearance of shoulders in the amide I band, are very obvious at short-times disappearing almost completely at longertimes. Also, the shifting of the amide II band to higher frequencies is maximized at short-times, from 1 548 cm-’ (PBS solution) to 1555 + 1 cm-’ at shorter times and 1549 cm-’ at longer times. This specific band shifting may indicate a different kind of hydrogen-bonding, for the N-H backbone groups of the BSM, from the solution state where most of the NH groups are hydrogen bonded to water to a hydrogen bonding with the hydroxyl branches of the polymer. These spectral changes (see Tab/e 2) and the time dependence probably means that only the initial glycoprotein molecules (short adsorption times) interact strongly with the polymeric surface. As a result of this interaction a different structure at the interface is formed. Further molecules are deposited on top of these first conformationally changed BSM layers and only interact amongst themselves.
t
L
71 h
I t
24 h
8h
4h
2h 1400
1400 Wavenumbers Figure 6 ATR-IR spectra of adsorbed bovine submaxillary mucin on spin cast PHEMA lens surfaces for different periods of time followed by 1 min of rinsing in buffer solution.
12
Biomateriels
1986, Vol 7 January
Wavenumbers Figure 7 ATR-IR spectra of adsorbed bovine submaxillary mucin on spin cast PHEMA/MAA lens surfaces for different periods of time followed by 1 min of rinsing in buffer solution.
Adsorption on soft contact lenses: E.J. Castiilo et al.
Tab/e 2 Frequencies* of rhe coniormat~onal bands forbovine serum muck in different states Solid
Solution
Adsorption (long-time)
Adsorption (short-time)
1653 1548 1242
1651 ?r 2 15492 1
1649 k 1 1555k2
NO
NO
-Amide I Amide II Amide III
1657 1545 1242
*Frequencies are given in cm-‘.
NO, Not detected.
It is well known that mucins aggregate easily under certain conditions36,37. One hypothesis is that buffer salts may be important for the structuring of mucin gels37,38. In the longer adsorption time spectra of Figures 5-7, a new peak at 1095 cm -’ is present. This peak can be assigned to the s(C-0) of the sugar groups, although this peak appears at 1080 cm-l and has a much smaller intensity in the native spectra. The 1095 cm--’ peak also may be assigned to the s(P-0) vibration. If this is correct, the buffer salts are adsorbed jointly in this step and may inititate BSM aggregation. These gels constitute the weakly bound layers of BSM to the lens surface. A singular feature that characterizes the BSM adsorption on soft contact lenses from the corresponding adsorption of serum albumin, lysozyme and y-globufin20~2’~39 is the large amount of easily desorbed glycoprotein. Baszkin et a/.17, utilizing an ‘in situ’ radioactive labelling technique to follow BSM adsorption on silicone grafted contact lenses, have reported similar results. These deposits can be observed with the naked eye and most of them are instantaneously desorbed when the lenses are placed in PBS solution. It is doubtful that most of the BSM is really adsorbed on the contact lens. As we have said before, buffer salts can initiate BSM aggregation; also prolonged heating may induce degradation and crosslinking. Possible aggregation mechanisms are given by saccharide-saccharide interactions37 and/or intermolecular disulphide bonding4’. Hence the resultant insoluble BSM gels will be deposited on the lens surfaces merely by the force of gravity. Figure 8 shows the amounts of mucin adsorbed for different periods of time on the different types of lenses, followed by PBS desorption for only 1 min. A calibration curve was previously obtained by the measurement of the
amide If area of lens samples containing known amounts of BSM20,21. It was observed that surface quality and chemcial composition exerted some influence on the process. LCPHEMA lenses adsorb significantly larger amounts of BSM than either SC-PHEMA or SC-PHEMA/MAA lenses. An interpretation of the results obtained follows. SC-PHEMA lenses possess better surface finish than the LC-PHEMA lenses due to the fabrication prccess. Lathe processing produces numerous marks on the lenses4’, 42; these surface defects may increase the lens surface area, mainly after its water swelling. Conversely, SC processing IS claimed to be a ‘surface-free defects technique’43. Accordingly, sutiace irregularities may induce additional sites for the deposition of BSM molecules. Similar results have been previously found for the albumin and lysozyme adsorption on the same type of lenses2’, 21. Drastic alterations of the spectra of BSM are observed for the irreversibly adsorbed glycoprotein. Figures 3, 10 and 7 I show the spectra of BSM adsorbed for 24 h on the
1572 1556 3
,wq
1498
1600 Wavenumbers Figure 9 AT&/R spectra of muck adsorbed for 24 h on lathe cut PHEMA surfaces after rinsing in buffer sol&on for I min and 2 h respectively.
2h
1650
l
20
I
40
I 60
t
Adsorption time (h) Figure 8 Adsorbed amounts of mocin on different soft contact lenses: 0, lathe cut PhEMAr X spin cast PHEMA/MA& l, spin cast PHEMA
1600 Wavenumbers Figure 10 AJR-IA spectra of mucin adsorbed for24 h on spin cast PHEMA surfaces after rinsing in buffer solution for 1 min and 2 h respectively.
Biomaterials
1986, Vol 7 January
13
Adsorption on soft contact lenses: E.J. Castillo et al.
1634
0 I
I
1700
1600
30
60
90
120
I
1500
Wavenumbers Figure 11 AT&IR spectra of mucin adsorbed for 24 h on spin cast PHEMA/ MAA surfaces after rinsing in buffer solution for: Bottom, 1 min; Top, 2 h.
different surfaces and subjected to 2 h of desorption with PBS buffer. Spectral changes generally agree with those found for the reversibly adsorbed BSM. The observed broadening and splitting of the amide I and amide II bands are accentuated here. The amide II band maxima shift to even higher frequencies; from the 1548 cm-’ observed in the native spectrum, to 1554 cm-’ for the reversibly adsorbed protein to 1558 cm-’ forthe irreversibly adsorbed BSM indicating a stronger hydrogen bonding between the polymer and the glycoprotein. New peaks are observed at 1592,1572,1530 and 1496 cm-’ and can be assigned to hydrophobic groups (tyrosine, phenylalanine)44and charged groups (aspartic and glutamic acid)45. See Table 3 for a more complete assignment of the spectral bands. More apparent shoulders at 1638 and 1672 cm-’ indicate the increased presence of P-sheet. The spectra of strongly bound BSM on PHEMA/M/U look more distorted. A single peak at 1629 cm -’ is obtained for amide I. This is indicative of an increased random to P-sheet transition. Also an increased involvement of the sugar groups is denoted by a new band at 1380 cm-‘. Figure 12 shows the remaining amounts of BSM on the lenses after longer periods of desorption with static PBS buffer. It is readily observed that all the lenses irreversibly adsorb approx. the same BSM quantities. Apparently, surface finish and chemical composition of the lenses are important factors only for the reversibly adsorbed protein.
Time of desorptron (min) Figure 12 Adsorbed amounts of mucin after different periods of desorption in static buffer for the three contact lens surfaces: 0, lathe cut PHEMA X spin cast PHEMA/Mti l, spin cast PHEMA.
From the above discussion, a three-layer model can be pictured (Figure 73) for the in vitro BSM adsorption on soft contact lens surfaces. The bottom layer of adsorbed BSM is constituted by a high proportion of P-sheet layers interacting strongly with the hydrogel surface by hydrogen bonding; apparently hydrophobic and charged side-chain amino acid residues also interact with hydrophobic areas of the polymer; this layer is rapidly formed as its spectra resemble the short-time adsorption spectra of reversibly adsorbed BSM. The second layer is composed of loosely associated BSM molecules and constitutes most of the weakly bound glycoprotein. The top layer consists of BSM gels and is capable of instantaneous desorption. If we assume that BSM has a molecular weight of 2 X 1 Or’ Daltons23,46 and a radius of gyration of 2000 A23*46 a monolayer of BSM on the lens surface will have a 0.4 j.rg/cm2 density. Accordingly, the first layer of strongly bound BSM will have a 1 O-l 5 monolayer thickness and the middle layer a thickness of 250-500
I
Table 3 Tentative assignments for the spectra of the irreversibly adsorbed bovine serum mucin on different contact lens surfaces SC-PHEMA
LC-PHEMA
1671 (sh) 1651 (s)
1670 1653
1637 1591 1572 1556 1529 1498
1636 (sh) 1591 (m) 1571 (b) 1558 (sh) 1529 (m) 1498 (s)
(sh) (sh) (b) (sh)
(m) (s)
ND
(sh) (s)
ND
SC-PHEMPJMAA ND ND
1629 1592 1571 1558 1533 1498 1348
(s) (m) (sh) (s) (sh) (m) (s)
Assignment B-Sheet (amide I) Random and/or a-helix (amide I) P-sheet (amide I) Tvrosine and phenylalanine Glutamic and aspartic acids Amide II Tryiptophane? Tyrosine and phenylalanine Sugar
sh, Shoulder; s, sharp; m, medium; b, broad: ND, not detected. Frequencies are given in cm-‘.
14
Biomaterials
1986, Vol 7 January
Hydrogel
Figure 13 Suggested model for the bovine submaxillary mucin adsorption on hydmgels. I, Crosslinked mucin; II, reversible adsorbed mucin; IN. irreversible adsorbed mocin.
Adsorption on soft contact lenses: E.J. Castillo et al.
(Grant
ISI-81-1
Center
for Applied
6103)
through
Polymer
of Macromolecular 18
their
cosponsorship
Research
Science,
Case
(CAPRI),
of the
Department
Western
Reserve
Uni-
versity.
NE 8,
REFERENCES 1
Tripathi,
R., Montague,
R. and Tripathl,
B.J., Soh
lens spoilation
in Soft
Contact Lenses; Clinical and Applied Technology, (Ed. M. Ruben), 2
C
3
------I 2
8
6 Time
of desorption
J. Wiley
Et Sons,
Tripathi,
R. and Tripathi,
4 5 6
These
monolayer
are
or bilayer
adsorbed.
higher
thickness
The very slow
the lens surfaces
values
would
for
process
on
LC-PHEMA
desorption
process
lenses.
J.B.
Polymers
D. and Tighe,
problem
Wedler.
of BSM
amount
from
8
F.C.,
slow
to 8-l
of
1983,
Cont. Lens. ,! 1980,
biomatenals
deposited
Fowler,
S.A. and Allansmith,
effect
lenses,
Arch. Opthalmol. 198 1, 99. 1382
Hathaway,
M.R.,
R.A. and Lowther,
in removmg
Allansmlth,
Korb,
in contact
The
G.E., Soft
on
soft
of cleaning
lens cleaners:
D.R.
and
Greiner
contact
soft contact
Their
J.V.,
VIII.
18, 2
effective-
J. Am. Optom. Assoc. 1978,
deposits,
M.R..
p 1 127
lens apphcations.
11, 525
0
Fowler.
S.A..
Gremer,
patients
49,
Giant
259
paptllary
Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1977,83,
lens wearers,
with
Gremer.
J.V.,
M.R..
J.V.
and Allansmlth.
giant
papillary
D.R.,
CovIngton
Korb,
Human
ocular
mucus;
Arch. Ophthalmol. 1982, 10
Dreyer,
V..
chemical
monolayers.
M.H..
Soft
contact
lenses
Am. J. Ophthalmol.
conjunctlvltls,
1056
1979,88,
9
10 h of PBS
of BSM is equivalent
Analysis
Co.,
In contact
J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1977,
from
in results.
a very
Llppencott
697
process of BSM
Clearly,
B.J.,
of biocompatibillty.
conjunctivltls
irreversibly
is not the case. Even after
rinsing the remaining
7
expected
the divergence
Figure 14 shows the longer time desorption adsorbed
the
a protein
desorption explain
than
p 299
B.J.,
Baker,
ness
monolayers.
1978,
Lens deposits: Classification, appearance Acta XX/W International Congress of Ophthal-
lenses,
Figure 14 Adsorbed amounts of mucin after 24 h of adsorption on lathe cut PHEMA lenses and different periods of desorption.
York,
and mangement, mology, (Ed. P. Henking), The
(h)
New
contact
Jensen,
and
X-ray
lenses
I”
H.I..
Peace,
A scanrung
100,
D.A.
microscopy
study,
1614
and
Prause,
microanalytlcal extended
D.G. and Allansmtth,
electron
J.D.,
Morphological
examination
Act. Ophtht/mo/.
wearing.
hlsto-
of deposits
on soft
1979,
57,
847
CONCLUSIONS 0
11
Solid state BSM presents PBS solution. hydrogen
Its main
bonding
structure from that in
a different difference
Amide
leading to a regularization
of the chain
content
and aspartic hydrogel
surface
and/or
is lightly
probably other
of a thick, weakly
small i.r. spectral
alterations.
associated
thick overlayer bound
instantaneously
with
13
can be correlated
M.A.,
Holly,
I. Factors
the cornea1
Holly,
F.J.
of BSM
increased
amount
for LC-PHEMA that the method
bound
shows
forces
adsorption
On the other
adsorbed
16
Proust.
only
17
salts. A
J.E..
Baszkm.
of the
cornea1
Surface
actuty
determlna-
and normals,
Exp.
M.R.,
Evolutlol
1980,
98,
M.M..
on surface-oxidized 94.
soft
lens
contact
Adsorption
polyethylene
of bovine
1 Co//.
films,
421
J.E. and Boissonade.
mucm
of
95
on silicone
M.NI.,
contact
1984,
5,
Adsorption
lenses
grafted
of bovine
with
poly(vinyi
175
analysis
Formatton
Co..
Boston,
Castlllo. of
and stablllty
J.L.,
protein
Anderson,
of biomedical
transform
E.J., Koenig,
changes
of the teat
1973
Koenig,
tance-Fourier 20
J.M.,
polymers
Biomaterials
mfra-red.
J.L., Anderson,
adsorptlon
on
of adsorbed
soft
human
Kllment.
J.M.
Lo, J.,
total
reflec-
5, 186
1984,
and Lo, R.. Charactenzatlon
contact
serum
C.K. and
by attenuated
lenses.
I.
Conformational
Biomaterials
albumtn.
1984,
5,
319
lenses
Castlllo.
E.J..
between
adsorb 22
23
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Holly,
Koemg,
lysozyme
F.J.
Pigman,
J.L.,
on hydrogels.
and soft contact
Surface
W.
Anderson.
chemistry 49.
J.N.
Il. Reversible
and
and
R..
Protem
interactions
Biomatenals 1 985,
lens surfaces,
of tear
Lo,
rreversible
component
J. Co//.
analogs,
221
and Gottschalk.
A., Submaxillary
gland
glycoprotems
I”
Glycoproteins: Their Composition, Structure and Function, (Ed. A. Gottschalk). 24
from American
‘wetting
Surface
the
of BSM.
acknowledge
C.H.,
A. and Bolssonade.
mucln
lnterf Sci. 1974,
authors
and
tear film
33. 39
E.J.,
Brown
6, 338
The
1970,
in dry eye patients
Allansmith,
Biomaterials
F.J..
BSM.
amounts
precorneal
Castillo.
Holly,
adsorptlon
equivalent
The
19
BSM.
SC-PHEMA
C.H.,
a continuous
film, in The Preocolar F//m and Dry Eye Syndromes, (Eds F.J. Holly and M. A. Lemp). Llttle
21
and
of soft
24, 479
A., Proust,
The chemical composition of the lenses does not appear to play a major rcle in either the weak or strong adsorption of PHEMA’MAA
Wettability
J.T. and Dohlman,
Baszkm,
plrrolidone).
it appears
does not increase
Dolman,
Arch. Ophthalmol
M.A.,
pathololgy
365
18
is
is found
S. and
87,
and maIntainin
tear components
and
submaxillary
and
and
Iwata,
Arch. Ophthalmol.
submaxillary
sites. An
BSM hand,
S.A.
coattngs.
that this BSM
on the strongly
adsorbed
of lens fabrication
of irreversibly
BSM
by gravity
additional
Lemp,
F.J., Patten.
Fowler,
F.J.,
R.. The
1980,
Exp. Eye Res. 197 1, 14, 239
lnterf Sci. 1983,
by the PBS solution.
of reversibly
surfaces.
with the
15
Montague,
In spreadmg surface,
and
tlon of aqueous
molecules.
It is proposed
glycoproteins removed
also interact
BSM
is deposited
Holly,
B.J. and
Ophthalmol.
spoilage.
Eye Res. 1977.
the help of the buffer
Lathe marks may originate
amount
over
of the protein.
acid residues
@ The structure
l
dissolution
Irreversibly adsorbed BSM presents an increased amount of P-sheet structure. Tyrosine, phenylalanine and glutamic
0
Lemp,
tear film.
14
II shift after protein
weakly
R.C.. Tripathi lens
eplthellum,
to the P-sheet 0
12
is due to the profuse
structure. l
Tnpathl. contact
the generous
Hydron and the National
financial
Science
support
Foundation
Plgman, occu:rence maxillary
Elsevier W.,
Publ.
Moschera, of
repetitive
glycoprotein,
Co., J.,
1966, Weiss,
p 434 M.
glycopeptide
ar,d
Eur. J. Biochem. 1973,
Biomatenals
Tettamanti.
sequences
I”
G..
bovine
The sub-
32. 148
1986, Vol 7 January
15
Adsorption on soft contecr lenses: E.J. Cestillo et al.
25
35
Tettamanti, G. and Pigman, W.. Purification and characterization of bovine and ovine submaxillary mucins, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968,124,41 Nisizawa, K. and Pigman, W., The composition and properties of the mucin clot from cattle submaxillary glands, Arch. Ore/ Biol. 1959, 1, 161 DeSalegui. M. and Plonska, l-l., Preparation and properties of porcine submaxillary mucin, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1964, 104, 282 Tabak, L.A., Levine, M.J., Mandel, J.D. and Ellison, S.A., Role of salivary mucins in the protection of oral cavity, J. Oral P&ho/. 1982, 11,l Hashimoto. Y., Hashimoto, S. and Pigman W., Purification and properties of porcine submaxillary mucin, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1964,104.282 Brodersen. B., Haugard, 8.J.. Jacobsen, C. and Pedersen, A.O., Mainchain sorption of water by serum albumin,Acta Chem. Stand, 1973, 27. 573 Koenig, J.L. and Tabb, D.L., Infrared spectra of globular proteins in aqueous solution, in Analytical Applications of FT-IR to Molecular andBio/ogice/Sys~ems, (Ed. J.R. Durig), D. Reidel Publ. Co., Hingham, M.A., 1980, pp 241-253 Miyazawa T., in Poly-a-amino acids, (Ed. G.D. Fasman). Arnold, London, 1967, p 257 Greenfield, N. and Fasman, G.D., Computed circulardichroism spectra for the evaluation of protein conformation, Biochem. 1969,8, 4108 Shogren, R., Structural Studies of Mucin Glycoprotein in Solution, MS Thesis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, 1983 Koening. J.L. Vibrational spectroscopy of carbohydrates, in infrared
16
Biometerials
26
27 28
29
30
31
32 33 34
1986, Vol 7 January
36
37
38 39
40 41 42
43 44 45 46
Reman spectroscopy of Biological Molecules, and (Ed. T.M. Theophanides), D. Reidel Publ. Co., 1978, p 125 Hill, H.D., Reynolds, J.A. and Hill, R.L., Purification, composition, molecular weight and subunit structure of ovine submaxillary mucin, J. Biol. Chem. 1977. 252, 3799 Crowther, R.S., Marriott, C. and James, S.L., Cation induced changes in the rheological properties of purified mucus glycoprotein gels, Eiorheol. 1984, 21, 254 Kwart, H. and Shashona, V.E., The structure and constitution of mucus, Trans. NYAcad. Sci. 1957, 19, 595 Castillo. E.J., Adsorption of proteins on hydrophilic polymers studied by Fourier transform infrared-attenuated total reflectance, Phd Thesis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, 1984 Shogren, R., (Unpublished results, 1984). Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio Castillo, E.J., Brown, C., Koenig, J.L. and Anderson, J.M., (Unpublished results, 1983) Matas, 8.R.. Spencer, W.H. and Hayes, T.L., Scanning electron microscopy of hydrophilic contact lenses, Arch. Ophthalmol. 1972, 88,287 Coombs, W.F. and Knoll, H.A., Spin casting contact lenses, Optical Eng. 1976, 15. 332 Bendit, E.G., Infrared absorption of tyrosine side chains in proteins, Biopolym. 1967. 5, 525 Timasheff, N.S. and Rupley, J.A., Infrared titration of lysozyme carboxyls, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1972, 150, 3 18 Bloomfield, V.A.. Hydrodynamic properties of mucous glycoproteins, Biopolym. 1983, 22, 2 14 1