VoL67,No.
BIOCHEMICAL
3,1975
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
PROTEIN SYNTHESIS ELONGATION FACTOR 1 FROM RAT LIVER: A ZINC METALLOENZYME Philip
S. Kotsiopoulos
and Scott
Department Boston Boston, Received
October
C. Mohr*
of Chemistry University
Massachusetts
02215
3,1975
Highly purified elongation factor 1 (light form, EFlL) from rat liver contains zinc as determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Analysis has been performed on the most active protein fraction from DEAE-Sephadex chromatography (estimated purity: 90%) and on the main band obtained from this fraction by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The data are consistent with a stoichiometry of approximately one g-atom of zinc per 54,000 daltons of EFlL protein. A functional role for Zn2+ is suggested by the fact that 0.3 mM l,lO-phenanthroline completely abolishes GTP binding by EFlL (measured by the nitrocellulose filter retention assay), while the isomeric non-chelator 1,7-phenanthroline has no effect. This inhibition can be overcome by the addition of excess zinc ion. Tightly a number include (3),
aspartate all
(5).
from
In this
ribosome
next
of the newly
*to
protein,
Hydrolysis steps
(4),
factors
A site
e,
important
through
and murine,
and nucleic (l),
EF-T
(E. coli) the
lengthened
used:
synthesis,
should EFlL -EFlN --
feline, a study
binding
I (2)
homologous
liver)**.
formation from
the ribosomal
of the peptide the A site
factor factor
viruses
protein
synthefactor
to the mRNA-
site
ternary (6).
comThe
bond and translocation
to the P site
1 (light 1 (heavy
myelo-
Elongation
be addressed elongation elongation
examples
of avian
and RD-114 RNA tumor of the
in
and RNA polymerase
of aminoacyl-tRNA
from
roles
Notable
of an aminoacyl-tRNA*EFl*GTP
EFl*GDP
peptidyl-tRNA
metabolism.
transcriptases
and EFl (rat
formation
of GTP releases
in protein
acid
and functional
DNA polymerase
simian,
we have begun
the
structural
and the reverse
catalyzes
whom correspondence
**Abbreviations
play
transcarbamylase
laboratory
elongation
ions
of nucleotide
Escherichia
virus
1, a soluble
plex.
zinc
of enzymes
blastosis
sis
bound
form), form).
are cata-
Vol.67,No.3,
1975
lyzed
by peptidyl
soluble
protein,
factor
transferase EF2 (rat
EF-T consists
lized
(7).
partly
resulted
sucrose
because
reticulocytes
ranging
to be five
times
(l'),
suggesting
that
reports
of the
preparations
association
Using
the
daltons
the
former
of zinc
presence
is
(10).
EFlL
of this MATERIALS
the
functionally
in EF-TU
have been crystal-
(8,9)
has been difficult
(12)
prompted
Its
(EFlN)
EFl from and comprises
from calf ternary active
isolation
to the
electrophoresis
same criteria,
in forming the
gel
homogeneity
each
The prokaryotic
phospholipids.
by disc these
and another
which
M.W. >200,000
to apparent
more efficient
presence
for
from
subunit)
respectively.
sources with
as determined
of 62,000
ribosomal
and EF-Ts,
animal
in size
has been purified
shown
large
EF-Tu
various
centrifugation.
subunits
of the
or EF-G (E. coli),
of its
M.W. 50-60,000,
gradient
identical
liver)
EF? from
in aggregates
(EFlL),
(part
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
of two entities,
Previously
to purify,
form
BIOCHEMICAL
brain
complex species.
us to examine
light and rabbit three has been
than
EFlN
Unpublished our
EFlL
metal. AND METHODS
The procedure used in the purification of EF? was that of Collins et al. A combined column of Sepharose 46 over(8) with the following modifications: layed with Sephadex G-200 (2:l vol/vol) was used instead of Sepharose 6B gel filtration. DEAE-Sephadex A-50 chromatorgraphy (1.5 x 40 cm column) followed the hydroxylapatite step and used a linear 0.1-0.5 M KC? gradient in 20 mM TrisHC? (pH 7.5), 1 mM DTT and 0.1 mM EDTA. The final column eluted EFlL at 0.4 M KC?. (See Table I.) Unfractionated according to (13).
E. coli
tRNA was prepared
and aminoacylated
with
[14Cl-phe
The assay for EF? activity was based on the ability of EFl to bind GTP, forming a complex which is retained on nitrocellulose filters (14). The reaction of the EFl*GTP complex with phe-tRNA to form a phe-tRNA*EFl*GTP ternary complex that is not retained on nitrocellulose filters was routinely performed as described (14) with the modification that phe-tRNA was incubated with EFl*GTP for only 30 sec. at 0". All radioactivity determinations were made using a Picker scintillation counter and a water-miscible scintillation fluid (15). Sodium-dodecyl-sulfate gel electrophoresis (16) and sucrose gradient centrifugation, 5-20%, (17) were used to determine the molecular weight of EFlL Both methods agreed closely with a using known standard proteins as markers. The EF? preparations following either hydroxylapatite M.W. of 54,000 + 4,000. or DEAE-Sephade? A-50 chromatography were analyzed using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (18) and determined to be approximately 60% and 90% pure EFlL, To assay for EF-1 activity, the gels respectively, by densitometric analysis. were sliced and treated as described in (8). GTP-binding activity was eluted from two major bands with approximately 60% recovery of EF? activity (Figure 1).
980
Vol.67,No.
BIOCHEMICAL
3,1975
EF IL
DYE
pmoles ’ GTP bound
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
2 I -
II-JIL migrotion
Figure
1.
Analysis
of EFl Preparation
+
by Polyacrylamide
Gel Electrophoresis.
Top frame: Photograph of gel stained with Coomassie Blue and densitometer tracing of the same sample (from hydroxylapatite). Bottom frame: EFl activity profile derived from slices of a gel identical to that depicted above. Protein was extracted from the slices and assayed as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS.
To assay for Zn2+ all glassware and standards were treated as described by Thiers (19) to avoid metal ion contamination. The gel slices corresponding to EFlL were digested with 2.0 ml concentrated HCl/HNO3 (3:l) and if necessary further oxidized with 1.0 ml hydrogen peroxide (BDH, ultra-pure). The residue In cases where analyses was dissolved in 1.0 ml 1% HN03 to give a clear solution. were performed directly on free enzyme in solution, the sample was digested with 8 N HN03 to evaporation and the residue dissolved as above. All assays were done using a Perkin-Elmer 305A atomic absorption,spectrophotometer with the flame attachment and the resonance line at 2138 A (20). In routine analyses protein concentration was determined by the method of Warburg and Christian (21). Absorbances at 280 and 260 nm were measured on a Zeiss PMQ II spectrophotometer. When highly pure enzyme was used protein concentration was also determined by the Lowry method (22) with crystalline bovine The two methods agreed within 10%. serum albumin as standard. [14C]-phenylalanine and [ 3H]-GTP were obtained from New England Nuclear; ATP, GTP, pyruvate kinase and phosphoenolpyruvate were from Sigma; hydroxylapatite (hypatite C) was from Clarkson Chemical Co.; Sephadex G-200, Sepharose
981
Vol.67,No.3,
1975
BIOCHEMICAL
Purification
TABLE I.
of EFlL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
from
Rat Liver
Figures in the table refer to a preparation starting from 340 g (wet weight) One unit of EFl activity binds one pmol GTP per minute per of frozen liver. milligram protein in the standard assay at 37". Yields given in the table reflect the selection of the EFlU fractions after gel filtration and hydroxylapatite chromatography and the EFlL fractions after DEAE-Sephadex chromatography. Fraction
Protein
(ml)
(mg)
SN-lOOa
500
28,000
56
4.8
100
Ammonium sulfate (35-7O%)b
150
9,750
65
11.4
83
Gel filtration
40
600
15
32.0
14
Hydroxylapatite
30
75
DEAE-Sephadex
10
apost-microsomal bdialyzed
Protein cont. (mg/ml)
Yield
Vol.
1.5
Specific activity (units/mg)
(X)
2.5
133
7.4
0.15
780
0.9
fraction
vs. 50 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 7.2)
and 1 mM DTT
filters were from 4B and DEAE-Sephadex A-50 were from Pharmacia ; nitrocellulose was purchased from K & K Laboratories, the Millipore Co.; l,lO-phenanthroline and 1,7- and 4,7-phenanthroline were purchased from the G.F. Smith Co. The latter two compounds were once-recrystallized from ethanol/water mixtures before All other chemicals were reagent grade. use. RESULTS Metal
Content
of EFlL
We performed the EFlL well liver
protein
as the free EFlL
atomic
band from
54,000.
halved
there
the Zn2+/protein
which
1.3 + 0.3
As shown
ratio
after
increased
for
II,
Zn2+ on gel could
DEAE-Sephadex
(SD) g-atom
in Table
was good correlation
analyses enzyme activity
enzyme solution
contained
weight
absorption
Zn2+/mole
be eluted
from 0.4
982
net
(Figure
1) as The rat
of enzyme of molecular the
ppm Zn*+ observed.
ug Zn2+/mg
containing
chromatography.
in each case where
in the
slices
protein
enzyme sample The fact at the
was that
hydroxyla-
Vol.67,No.3,
1975
TABLE II.
Zinc
BIOCHEMICAL
Content
of EFll
from
The mean value for zinc content of (mol. wt. 54,000). Preparation A EFlL by densitometric analysis of DEAE-Sephadex A-50, 90% pure. All where noted. The blank consisted case of free enzyme analyses which albumin.
(0.050)
1.46
A-Z
60
0.083
(0.045)
1.14
30
0.040
(0.045)
1.10
36
0.068
(0.072)
1.56
18
0.036
(0.072)
1.65
A-4b
60
0.073
(0.042)
1.01
B-l
77
0.123
(0.052)
1.32
B-2b
36
0.042
(0.055)
0.96
in the tablearethe net are given in parentheses.
were
of purification
to nearly
1.0 pg Zn2+/mg
stage
Zn2+ is
indicates
on EFlL*GTP
complete
on nitrocellulose
the
mixture
concentrations (see
Table
10m4 M Zn2+.
throline,
of EFl*GTP filters)
had no effect
activity
equal
directly
in 8 N HN03
protein
at the final
of the enzyme.
(i.e.
no binary
to or greater were
The activity
on the
corresponding
when l,lO-phenanthroline
of l,lO-phenanthroline
The non-chelating
part
the
Activity
at a concentration
III).
hydrolyzed
an integral
Binding
inhibition
was retained reaction
observed;
solutions
of Chelators We found
ppm zinc
protein 60% pure is from except in the serum
Zinc Content (g-atom mole)
0.115
purification
with
Observed Zinca (Pm)
65
stage
activity
EFlL is 1.3 + 0.3 g-atom per mole is from hydroxylapatite, estimated polyacrylamide gels; preparation B analyses were done with gel slices of a protein-free gel slice except had a blank containing 50 pg bovine
A-l
bin these cases EFlL with gentle heating.
Lower
Rat Liver
EFl Present (us EF~L)
aValues blanks
Effect
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Preparation No.
A-3
patite
AND BIOPHYSICAL
less
was restored isomers,
GTP-binding
983
was present than
effective
3 x 10-4
The effect
in M.
in inhibiting
to 90% of the
1,7-phenanthroline activity.
complex
control
and 4,7-phenanof l,lO-phenan-
VoL67,No.
Figure
3, 1975
2.
BIOCHEMICAL
Recorder
Chart
Tracing
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
from Atomic
Absorption
Analysis
of EFlL.
The ordinate calibration comes from Zn2' standard solutions run on the same day. The sample consisted of a slice from a polyacrylamide electrophoresis gel containing the EFlL band (see Figure 1); the blank corresponds to an equivalent slice of a protein-free gel. Both slices were digested as described in the text and dissolved in 1% HN03 for analysis.
throline
cannot
be attributed
present
in large
excess
l,lO-phenanthroline EDTA inhibited tively
high
50%.
Since
by chelating
EFlL
reaction
much more strongly
much less
effectively
than
buffer
during
isolation
must represent
removal
since
mixture
and it
with
Zn2+ than
GTP-binding
contained of tightly
add ition
of Mg2+,
is
Mg2+ is
known that
with
Mg2+ (23).
l,lO-phenanthroline.
of EDTA (1 mM) reduced
by l,lO-phenanthroline,
restored
removal
complexes
the final
the inhibition
possible
(10 mM) in the
concentration
agents
to its
10-4 bound
A comparaactivity
by only
M EDTA, inhibition Zn2+ ions.
As with
of 10m4 M Zn2+ to EDTA-inh ibited
enzyme activity. DISCUSSION
Because EFlL
of the relatively
preparations
and the
contamination,
analytical
with
as a zinc
certainty
small rather data
absolute
considerable alone
metalloenzyme.
would
not Thus,
984
amounts
of Zn2+ ( 0.1
chances
of adventitious
suffice although
to identify our
atomic
ppm) in Zn2+ this
protein
absorption
Vol.67,No.3,
1975
TABLE III.
Effect
BIOCHEMICAL
of Chelating
AND BIOPHYSICAL
and Non-chelating Binding
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Isomers
on EFl-Nucleotide
Activity
Each assay (0.25 ml total volume) consisted of 25 ~1 enzyme solution which contained 80 Pg EFl, 25 ~1 reagent (incubated with EFl for 45 minutes prior to reaction), and GTP-binding mixture of 150 ~1, containing 0.10 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.10 M NH4C1, 0.02 M MiC12, 3.75 x 10-3 M phosphoenolpyruvate, 10 ug pyruvate kinase and 2.5 x loM [3H] - GTP. System
pmol
16.7
0
+ 1.0 mM l,lO-phenanthrolinea
0.0
100
+ 0.3 mM l,lO-phenanthroline
0.0
100
+ 0.1 mM l,lO-phenanthroline
1.7
90
13.4
20
5.0
70
8.3
50
15.0
10
+ 1.D mM EDTA + 0.1 mM Zn2+
15.9
5
+ 1.0 mM 1,7-phenanthroline
17.0
0
+ 1.0 mM 4,7-phenanthroline
16.7
0
Control
+ 0.01
mM l,lO-phenanthroline
+ 10.0
mM EDTA
+ 1.0 mM EDTA +O.l
mM l,lO-phenanthroline + 0.1 mM ZnPtb
aThe phenanthroline isomers were 10% methanol. A methanol blank the reported values. b
(Table
Zn2'/mole
EFlL,
II)
consistently
showed
the demonstration
or EDTA (Table
of inhibition control
added from stock solutions containing (0.5 pmol GTP) was subtracted from
25 ~1 of 1 mM ZnC12 was added to the reaction mixture for 3 min. incubation at 37" before terminating the reaction.
analyses
line
% Inhibition
GTP Bound
III)
the presence
of inhibition
represents
by the non-chelating
essential
of approximately
of GTP-binding supporting
phenanthroline
an additional
by l,lO-phenanthro
evidence.
isomers
1.0 g-atom
provides
The absence an important
(4). Further
and to establish
experiments the
are
required
stoichiometry
to specify with
certitude.
985
the precise The Zn2'
role
of Zn2+ in EFlL
may merely
aid
in
Vol. 67, No. 3, 1975
maintaining
the
(11, so that
might
native
its
GTP-binding
activity.
provide
to almost
full
Zn2+ also
influences
in a subunit
of this
recovery the
growth
Co2+ for
Zn2+ in EFl poses
the
system
in which
peptidyl-tRNA,
exploration
occurs,
aminoacyl-tRNA,
EFlL,
of this
practical under
to chelating
agents
Drews et al.
(6,29))
stages
from other etc.)
as opposed
v&,
because
and GTP.
of Zn2+
been reported
for
in attempts
structural
--
role
complexity
of
of 80s ribosome,
A presumptive
resonance
role
GTP to H20 (or
for
mRNA, the metal
perhaps
techniques
might
first allow
liver
EFIL as a zinc
that
future
experiments
of well-defined
is
addition probably
with
metal
such as EDTA may be harmful and deliberate
metalloenzyme
ion
(as,
this
brain
be examined
for
protein
for
example,
Exposure in the work
of 0.1 mM Zn2+ to buffers advisable
in order
(14),
rabbit
the
presence
reticulocyte and possible
Charles
Terner
for
986
a generous
supply
of
in the
to to maintain (30). (lo),
EFl preparawheat
functional
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Professor
im-
should
concentration.
to the case of T7 RNA polymerase (calf
has the
of zinc.
We thank
the
(28).
conditions
should
that
of Zn2+ favoring
of the
an aggregate
Magnetic
of rat
sources
leads
involvement
to merely
(25-27)).
analogous
Zn2+
experiments.
from
of purification
maximum activity,
of the
been unsuccessful
transfer
consequence
be performed
of
dichroism
indicate
has recently far
loss
replacement
removal
A similar
phosphoryl
possibility
The identification
(31,32),
versa.
difficulties
catalysis
protein
of EFl,
We have thus
considerable
since
experiments
process
--
removal
in structure,
and vice
consequent
such as circular
In any event,
Zn2+ in reactivation
be to assist
to a ribosomal
probe
of aggregation
(24).
aspartate transcarbamylase
with
Preliminary
of a functional
for
tions
state
factor
Demonstration
latter
denaturation
an alteration of activity.
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
as in E. coli
hypothesis.
of EFlH to EFlL,
to substitute
mediate
partial
aggregation/disaggregation
mouse nerve
would
conformation
causes
too drastic
conversion
AND BIOPHYSICAL
A conformation-sensitive
a test
cause
ion
protein
removal
must not
the
BIOCHEMICAL
of rat
livers,
germ role
Vol.67,No.3,1975
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Professor Standish C. Hartman for the use of his laboratory facilities, fessor Arno Heyn for assistance with the atomic absorption instrument, Marcus Horn for densitometer scans. National Cancer Institute grant 02 supported this research.
Proand Dr. CA 14397-
REFERENCES 1.
2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. ii: 12. 13. 14.
and Weber, K. (1971) J. Biol. Chem. Rosenbusch, J.P., Springgate, C.F., Mildvan, A.S., Abramson, R., Engle, L.A. (1973) J. Biol. Chem. 248, 5987-5993. Scrutton, M.C., Wu, C.-W., and Goldthwait, D.A. (1971) Sci. 68, 2497-2501. Auld, D.S., Kawaguchi, H., Livingston, D.M., and Vallee, Nat. Acad. Sci. 71, 2091-2095. Auld, D.S., Kawaguchi, H., Livingston, D.M., and Vallee, Biophys. Res. Comnun. 62, 296-302. Nolan, R.D., Grasmuk, H., and Drews, J. (1975) Eur. J.
246, J.L.,
1644-1657. and Loeb,
Proc.
Nat.
Acad.
B.L.
(1974)
Proc.
B.L.
(1975)
Biochem.
Biochem.
50, 391-
402. Arai, K., Kawakita, M., and Kaziro, Y. (1974) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 76, 283292. Collins, J.F., Moon, H.-M., and Maxwell, E.S. (1972) Biochemistry 11, 41874194. Legocki, A.B., Redfield, B., Liu, C.K., and Weissbach, H. (1974) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 71. 2179-2182. McKeehan, W.L:, and Ha&sty ', B. (1969) J. Biol. Chem. 244, 4330-4339. Legocki, A.B., Redfield, B., and Weissbach, H. (1974) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 161, 709-712. Cohn, M., and Miller, D.L. ( 1974) personal communication. von Ehrenstein, G. (1967) Methods Enzymol. 12A, 588-596. Moon, H.-M., and Weissbach, H. (1974) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 46,
254-262. 15. 16. '1:: 19.
20. 21.
22.
Z: 25. 8: 2
Bray, G. (1960) Anal. Biochem. 1, 279-285. Weber, K., and Osborn, M. (1969) J. Biol. Chem. 244, 4406-4412. Martin, R.G., and Ames, B.N. (1961) J. Biol. Chem. 236, 1372-1379. Davis, B.J. (1964) Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 121, 404-427. Thiers, R.E. (1957) Methods Biochem. Anal. 5, 273-335. Fuwa, K., Pulido, P., McKay, R., and Vallee, B.L. (1964) Anal. Chem. 36, 2407-2411. Warburg, O., and Christian, W. (1942) Biochem. Z. 310, 384-421. Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., and Randall, R.J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275. Anderegg, G. (1963) Helv. Chim. Acta 46, 2397-2410. Pattison, S.E., and Dunn, M.F. (1975) Biochemistry 14, 2733-2739. Eil, C., and Wool, I.G. (1971) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 43, lOOl1009. Correze, C., Pinell, P., and Nunez, J. (1972) FEBS Lett. 23, 87-91. Issinger, O.-G., and Traut, R.R. (1974) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 59, 829-836. Mildvan, A.S. (1974) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 43, 357-399. Drews, U., Bednarik, K., and Grasmuk, H. (1974) Eur. J. Biochem. 41, 217-
227. 30. 31.
32.
Coleman, Tarrago', Biochem. Golin'ska,
J.E. (1974) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comnun. 60, A., Allende, J.E., Redfield, B., and Weissbach, Biophys. 159, 353-361. B., and Legocki, A.B. (1973) Biochim. Biophys.
987
641-648. H. (1973) Acta
324,
Arch, 156-170.