Vol. 78, No. 4, 1977
BIOCHEMJCAL AND BIOPHYSJCAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
PROTEOLYTIC ORIGIN OF A MODIFIED FORM OF RNA POLYMERASE I FROM Artemia Carmen Osuna,
Jaime
Universidad
September
LARVAE
Renart
de Enzimologia
Instituto
Received
salina
and Jesik
de1 CSIC, Aut&oma,
SebastiZn
Facultad
de Medicina,
Madrid-34,
Spain
16. 1977
SUMMARY Extracts from Artemia saZina larvae contain a form of RNA polymerase (Ia) not present in the embryos. The appearance of this RNA polymerase during the larval development is correlated with a decrease in the levels of RNA polymerase I. The modification of RNA polymerase I to Ia was obtained in vitro by incubation of enzyme I with either a larvae extract or protease B, one of the multiple proteases induced during the larval development. The results indicate that the modified form of RNA polymerase present in the larvae is produced in vitro by proteolysis of enzyme I during the extraction and solubilization of the RNA polymerases. INTRODUCTION The embryos stage
from Artemia
and after
time
(1).
dehydration
The cysts
ation
of development
which
hatched
in a short
In a series merases levels
rise
it
interval
of studies
in both
dormant
of RNA polymerase is produced
in vitro
after
control
(nauplii)
that
of
reiniti-
of nauplii
subsequent
culture
the
there (3).
the larval
timing
during exist
enables of specific
three
the Artemia RNA poly-
The investigation
development
(4,5)
and the In this
in the nauplii
by proteolysis
periods
after
The isolation
of transcription
(5).
long
(2).
embryos
hatching
present
larvae
at the gastrulae
for
to investigate
of the polymerases
shortly
state
and their
previously during
development
at 30°C.
regulation
and developing
new form of RNA polymerase
MATERIAL
of time,
as their
of the RNA polymerases levels
swimming hours
on the
their
in a dormant
populations
has been reported
in the relative
opment
remain
16-18
synchronous as well
can stop
to free
in about
events
development
they
give
one to have highly developmental
salina
has shown
appearance
paper
during
of the
we report
the
of RNA polymerase
changes
of a new form
early
that larval
the devel-
I.
AND METHODS
Chemicals and Buffers. Nucleotides, phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, and soybean trypsin inhibitor type I-S, were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. 3H-UTP from the Radiochemical Centre, Amersham. Calf thymus DNA from Worthington.Biochemical Abbreviations:
Copyrig& AN rights
Q I977
PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride;
by Acndemic Press. inc. ik my form reserr,erf.
of reproduction
STI,
soybean
trypsin
inhibitor.
Vol. 78, No. 4, 1977
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL ?ESEAK’-I
~“.‘~.?l?l,“\‘r~,4TI~~l~
GmbH, and ?EAE-Sephadex ~42:) from co. a-Amanitin from Boehringer Mannheim, Pharmacia. 50 mM Tris-HCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 5 mM mercaptoetil;~nol Buffer B contains: and 20% glycerol, pH 7.5. Buffer C is buffer B plus 0.075 ?1 arm>onium sulfate. Buffer D is buffer B plus 0.05 M ammonium sulfate. Buffer H contains: 50 mM Tris-HCl. 0.2 mM EDTA. 5 mM mercaptoethanol and 0.6 M ammonium sulfate, pH 7.5. Organism-and growth conditions. A&ania saZina cysts were obtained from San Francisco Bav Brand Inc.. Division of Metaframe Co.. Menlo Park, Cal. 94025, USA. Treatment of the dry embryos and growth conditions were as described elsewhere (3). Nauplii hatched between 16-18 hours were isolated and grown synchronously at 30°C. Samples were taken at intervals and the anima1.s were collected by filtration on a cloth and washed with distilled water. The samples were kept at -70°C until use. Preparation of the extracts and enzymatic assays. The preparation of the extracts and the solubilization of the RNA polymerases were as described elsewhere (3) using buffer H. The RNA polymerase assays were carried out according to Renart and SebastiSn (3) using native calf thymus DNA as template. One unit of RNA polymerase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzes the incorporation of 1 pmole of UTP into trichloroacetic acid insoluble material in 10 min under the assay conditions. Proteases B and C were isolated from 35 hour old nauplii by chromatography on DEAE-cellulose as described by Osuna et al. (6). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Figure merases
la shows
which
pattern
are
four
peak of activity polymerase levels III
peaks
is eluted Ia.
Ia which
decrease
increase
during
this
II
Several
between
experiments controlled
with
icant
of nauplii amount
observed
after
Several I,
including
the
incubation
mechanisms a proteolytic
out
after insensitive
new peak was called increas'e
to test
undetectable between
I or Ia.
Therefore,
this
levels. I and the
action.
a nauplii
1391
multiple
extract
was studied
does not
contain
the RNA polymerase
by
I is that the a signifIa
of the RNA polymerase
in the modification
In fact,
I.
possibility. with
was made by modification
can be involved
The
the two enzymes,
of the incubation
incubation
I.
form of RNA pvlymerase
I was incubated
in the
of RNA
of RNA polymerase
Figure 2 shows that RNA polymerase Ia form. Control experiments showed
utilized
of RNA polymerase
a few hours
of RNA polymerase
reaching
RNA polyan elution
obtained
of the RNA polymerase
and the product
extract
This
a relationship
carried
chromatography on DFAE-Sephadex. converted to the RNA polymerase amount
I.
be a modified
RNA polymerase
with
within
are
and the levels
period
Ia could
three
A new a-amanitin
a decrease
constant
Ia suggest
conditions
lb).
RNA polymerase
the decrease
have been
purified
However,
activity
c, and d) shows a relative
remain
RNA polymerase
Partially
(3).
(Fig.
developmental
of RNA polymerase
instance,
under
1 (b,
is correlated
The correlation for
extracts
contain
on DEAE-Sephadex
polymerases
before
Figure
of RNA polymerase
of A. .saZina
of RNA polymerase
of the larvae
RNA polymerase
nauplii
by chromatography
to the embryo
hatching,
chromatography
newborn
separated
identical
after
that
proteases
of RNA polymerase are
induced
I.
Vol. 78, No. 4, 1977
BIOCHEMICAL
lo
C .L
20
i
3-
la
I
II
m
30
40
30
IO
x E
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
1
IO
20
I 3-
u
30
IO
T24
I
40
I
m
50
II
-f27
E” s. 2 < z
2-
Iz
It
2-
‘1b 4 1 ii-
jw 0 IO
I 30
20
-o-
40
Jo
IO
Fraclion
20
30
40
50
number
Fig.
1. Separation of RNA polymerases isolated from naupli at different times of development by DEAE-Sephadex chromatography. Extracts were prepared from newborn nauplii (Tlg) and 3, 6, and extracts from 3 g nauplii 9 hour old larvae (T21, 24, 27). The soluble (ww) were subjected to chromatography on 30 ml columns of DEAE-Sephadex A25 equilibrated with buffer C. The extracts were diluted with buffer B to get a final concentration of 0.075 M ammonium sulfate. After the application of the sample the column was washed with 30 ml buffer C and eluted with 120 ml linear gradient from 0.075 M to 0.6 M ammonium sulfate in buffer B. Fractions of 3 ml were collected and 50 ~1 were assayed for RNA polymerase activity in the presence (0) and absence (0) of 10 rig/ml of a-amanitin. The specific activity of the UTP in the assay was 230 CPM/pmole and the incubation time of the reaction was 30 min.
during
the early
proteases
extracts.
experiment is
unable
protease
with of the
chromatography.
of RNA polymerase and the effect to inhibit B, while
(6,7) the
The effect
by incubation
by DEAE-Sephadex modification
development
B and C correlates
in the nauplii was tested
larval
the in
time
I to Ia. vitro
of appearance
of proteases
isolated Protease
of several
ST1 inhibits
and the timing
of
of RNA polymerase
Fig.
modification the modification.
Ia
B and C on RNA polymerase
proteases with the polymerase B is able to produce in Vitro
inhibitors
1392
of induction
3 shows
the results
of proteolytic
I
followed the
of this enzymes.
of the RNA polymerase The pattern of the
PMSF
I by effect
of
Vol. 78, No. 4, 1977
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
Fraction
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
number
Fig.
2. In by a nauplii extract. About 1000 units of isolated RNA polymerase I (DEAE-Sephadex fraction) were incubated with 0.25 ml of-an-extract from nauplii (T24) during 60 min at 4°C. An identical amount of RNA polymerase I was kept as a control at 4°C. The treated and untreated samples of RNA polymerase I were subjected to chromatography on two 3 ml columns of DEAE-Sephadex equilibrated with buffer D. After application of the sample the column was washed with 5 ml buffer D and eluted with a 20 ml linear gradient from 0.05 M to 0.25 M ammonium sulfate. Fractions of 1 ml were collected and assayed for RNA polymerase activity. The figure shows the fractions collected after the application of the gradient. Top: elution of the RNA polymerase I control. Bottom: elution of the polymerase incubated with the nauplii extract.
the
two protease
indicated
that
These proteolytic that
protease
the presence
produced
during
nauplii
To test
Fig.
4 shows the results
only
the modification Ia.
Therefore,
previous
B on RNA polymerase the this
I.
larval
out
The results
of this
experiment.
RNA polymerase
1393
of the
Ia is
produced
levels
suggest of RNA
of RNA poly-
and absence
The presence
also
and solubilization
two extractions
I but also
by a
may be an artefact
the extraction
in the presence
of the RNA polymerase
produced
development
possibility
carried
which
to PMSF (6).
Ia is
Ia and the decrease early
results
resistant
RNA polymerase
of enzyme I during were
with
by ST1 but
that
of RNA polymerase
polymerase.
polymerase
inhibited
of protease
I observed
from
in agreement
indicate
by proteolysis
of this
is B is
experiments action
polymerase
merase
inhibitors
of STI.
of ST1 prevents the appearance in vitro
during
not
of RNA the
Vol. 78, No. 4, 1977
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
I
Fraction
b
number
Fig.
3. In vitro modification of RNA polymerase I by protease B and of proteolytic inhibitors. 600 units of RNA polymerase I (DEAE-Sephadex fraction) were ed with 0.3 units of protease B (6) for 6 min at 4°C in the absence the presence of 50 ug/ml of ST1 and 1 mM PMSF. After the incubation, samples were subjected to chromatography on 3 ml DEAE-Sephadex A25 as described in the legend of Fig. 2. a) RNA polymerase I control. polymerase I incubated with protease B. c) RNA polymerase I incubated protease B plus STI. d) RNA polymerase I incubated with protease B PMSF.
preparation
of the extracts.
and the decrease increase
ment
the levels
in
The kinetics
of enzyme I observed of protease
of the appearance in Fig,
B that
during
incubatand in the columns b) RNA with plus
of the form
1 can be correlated
occurs
effect
this
stage
with
la the
of develop-
(6). Fig.
4 also
shows that
the presence
of ST1 produces
indicating that RNA polymerase III activity, this enzyme may also be an artefact produced protease. The existence merases
raises
potential
role
of proteases
several
theoretical
of the proteases
with
the observed in vitro
a differential and practical
in the in &vo
1394
a recovery
of the
disappearance
of
by a STI-sensitive activity
problems, regulation
on the RNA polyincluding of the RNA
the poly-
Vol. 78, No. 4, 1977
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
ra
1
II
m -ST1
h
L
1 40
20
60
+ ST1
20
40
Fraction
60
number
Fig.
4. Effect of soybean trypsin inhibitor on the extraction of the RNA if_olymerases from nauplii. 10 gr (ww) of nauplii (T27) were divided in two parts. 5 g were homogenized with buffer H and 5 gr were homogenized with the same buffer containing 100 lig/ml of STI. The proteolytic inhibitor was also present at this concentration in all buffers used for the dilution of the last The extracts were subjected to extract prior to the chromatography. chromatography on two columns as described in the legend of Fig. 1. Top: chromatography of the extract prepared in the absence of the STI. Bottom: chromatography of the extract prepared in the presence of STI.
merases
and their
role
RNA polymerases. systems in
as well
the levels
enzymes
and during
problems
as during
bacterial
are particularly
systems sporulation
including
(8),
when changes
of new proteolytic
on RNA polymerases yeast
in the
in developing
transitions,
and appearance
of proteases
heterogeneity
important
and growth
proteases
The effect
biological
of an artefactual
physiological
of preexisting
can occur.
ed in several (9)
These
in the creation
has been
L7rosoph~IZa
report-
maZanognster
(10).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Elvira Dominguez and Francisca de Luchi for their technical assistance. C.O. holds a fellowship from P.F.P.I., Spain. This work was supported in part by a grant from Fundaci6n Juan March and Fondo National ra el Desarrollo de la Investigaci6n CientFfica.
1395
pa-
Vol. 78, No. 4, 1977
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
Dutrieu, J. (1960) Arch. 2001. Exp. Gen. 99, l-134. Hentschel, C.C. and Tata, J.R. (1976), Trends in Biochem. Sci. 1, 97-100. Renart, J. and Sebastihn, J. (1976) Cell Different. 5, 97-107. Birndorf, H.C., D'Alessio, I. and Bagshaw, L.C. (1975) Develop. Biol. 45, 34-43. Abstr. SebastiZn, J., Renart, J. and Osuna, C. (1975) 10th FEBS Meeting Paris, p. 302. M.A. and Sebastign,J. Osuna, C., Olalla, A., Sillero, A., Gunther Sillero, (1977) Develop. Biol.in press. SebastiCn, J., Osuna, C., Olalla, A., Renart, J., Cruces, J. and Sillero, M.A.G. (1976) J. Cell Biol. 70, 340a. Dezelle, S., Wyers, F., Sentenac, A. and Fromageot, P. (1976) Eur. J. Biochem. 65, 543-552. K.F. (1976) FEBS Letters 71, 205-208. Greenleaf, A.L,, Haars, R. and Bautz, Linn, T.G., Greenleaf, A.L., Shorenstein, R.G. and Losick, R. (1973) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 70, 1865-1869.
1396