BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 99, No. 3,198l April
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
15, 1981
Pages
804-812
PROTON TRANSLOCATION IN HYDROGENBONDS WITH LARGE PROTON POLARIZABILITY FORMED BETWJ3ENA SCHIFF BASE AND PHENOLS. + Pushti Prakash Rastogi and Georg Zundel Physikalisch-Chemisches Institut der Universitat M.iinchen; Theresienstr. 41, D-8000 Miinchen 2, West-Germany. Received
February
18,1981
SUMMARY: OH***N $ 0-m ..H+N hydrogen bonds formed between N-all-transretinylidene butylamine (Schiff base) and phenols (1:l) are studied by IR spectroscopy. It is shown that both proton limiting structures of these hydrogen bonds have the same weight with Schiff base minus pKa phenol) = 5.5. A pKa (50%) = (pK, protonated With the largely symmetrical systems, continua demonstrate that these hydrogen bonds show great proton polarizability. In the Schiff base + tyrosine system in a non-polar solvent the residence time of the proton at the tyrosine residue is much larger than that at the Schiff base. In CH CC1 these hydrogen bonds show, still proton polariza &1114 y, i,e., however, $he position of the proton transfer equilibrium OH-.-N + 0 *s-H N is shifted to and fro as function of the nature of the environment of this hydrogen bond. Consequences regarding bacteriorhodopsin are discussed.
INTRODUCTION N-all-trans-retinylidene studied
by Kristoforov,
visible
spectroscopy.
plexes hydrogen excess (I)
are formed,
Zvonkova They
of p-cresol,
OH---N
$0-s
they
phoric
group
at
that
the
s.H+N (II) (I)
rhodopsin
Schiff
are
with
two proton
Present address: Department Lucknow U.P., India.
formed
Copyright 0 1981 by Academic Press, Inc. AN rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
the
to
804
the proton
donor
were IR and
With
com-
in the
very
large
and the proton the base.
protonation
of Chemistry,
0006-291X/81/070804-09$01.00/0
(1) using
molecule.
bonds shifts that
complexes
base - p-cresol
1: 1 complexes
the p-cresol
1:2 complexes
suggested of
in
- p-cresol
and Evstigneeva
found
whereby
bond is present
result
+
butylamine
groups
in the
From this
of the
chromo-
must take
Lucknow University,
part.
Vol. 99, No. 3,198l
We have B,H-B2 ures
BIOCHEMICAL
shown (2)-(7)
and (II)
proton
side
Thus,
of
Recently
ated
by the
observed
and suggested
NH+.. .B-
with
chromophore
and Lemke
On the basis
of this
a study
result
Mohler
bonds the
retinyl
Schiff
group.
results
amino acid
observed
(8) pro(9),
base is modul-
Furthermore,
that
(11)
different
and Navangul
they
reconstitution the Schiff
residues,
be of particular
base
whereby
they
that
Fin-
an equilibrium
the pKa value
suggest,
an
significance.
depends on the nitration
that
of
of this
this
at the the
residue.
residue
parti-
system.
on the nature
a Schiff
proton
and Oesterhelt
these
on a change of
in the chromophoric
Thus, between
i.e.,
large
between
during
of bacteriorhodopsin
26 residue,
cipates
of
bond should
Oesterhelt
ally,
struct-
to one or to the
bacterioopsin
two protonable
hydrogen
(I)
limiting
such hydrogen
an anionic
with
on the basis
may interact
type
show very
Fischer
of the
with
pH-changes
(IO)
proton
equilibria
by Blatz,
spectrum
interaction
the
environments
the dark
postulated
the absorption
COMMUNICATIONS
bond.
of bacteriorhodopsin,
that
both
the case of local
RESEARCH
bonds of
weight,
by their
investigating
as earlier
posed,
in
the hydrogen
chromophores
hydrogen in which
(II),
may be shifted
other
BIOPHYSICAL
have noticeable
polarizabilities.
tyr
that
'T" B;...H+B2 (I)
AND
of OH***N $
base and phenols
O-**.H+N
bonds formed
seems of particular
interest.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION N-all-trans-retinylidene phenols ccl*
(1:l)
solutions,
summarized
were studied using
in the
butylamine
(Schiff
as function
of the
IR spectroscopy.
table.
80.5
All
base)
with
pKa of the
systems
various phenol
and results
in are
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 99, No. 3,19Bl
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
Table Data Schiff
base
followins
with
of
the
Schiff
base
+ Phenol
A PK~~'
PKa
ohenols 1
protected
2
tyrosine
11.13
1:l
Complexes
R complex
% proton
formation
transfer
3
4
xx)
-4.14
95
-10~
KPT
KpT
5
6
7
9.2
0.10
+0.99
phenol
9.92
(14)
-3.93
96
2,4-dichlorophenol
7.30
(14)
-1.91
86
15.5
0.18
io.74
2,3,5-trichlorophenol
6.43
(14)
-0.44
96
18.0
0.22
+0.66
pentachlorophenol
4.74
(14)
+1.25
98
27.2
0.37
+0.43
2,4,6-trinitrophenol
0.81
(14)
+5.18
47.4
0.90
+0.045
pKa
x)
xx)
pKa
of
the
Schiff
value
of
tyrosine
The Schiff
taken
at
gen bonds in these
base observed complexes sorbance of the
the Schiff proton
in
~01.6.
complexes
complex
formation
of solutions
equilibria
this
in
band is
indicated
base -. HCl system,
(~01.4)
These values
oKa of the protonated of the Schiff base is
using
fig.lg,
in ~01.5
are plotted Schiff taken
shown for
the
Schiff
The integrated integrated
absorbance
proton
and the equilibrium of
theApK,,
to
of
transfer
constant
the phenols.
amounting
ab-
100% transfer
The percentage
as function
806
integrated
the various
in which
ref.(l2)
hydro-
of the protonated
base minus pKa of from
phenols.
O-.**H+N
from the
by an arrow.
base occurs. given
the pure
the OH.**N g
vibration
band was calibrated
base is
of
are determined
the C=N stretching -1 at 1655 cm . This
to the Schiff
to the Schiff
ref.(l2)
ref.(13)
equilibria
in fig-lb-lf, of
from
spectra
The proton-.transfer
of
from
the absorbance of the OH stretching vibration -1 (see fig.3). This band was 3600 or 3540 cm
from the
absorbance
taken
from
the phenols
calibrated
5.99
base - phenol
were determined of
base
>99
5.99,
i.e. The pKa and
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 99, No. 3,1981
.I ;r
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
I
\ ---T&F
Fig.
YC=N band of N-all a proton is present an arrow).
1
trans retinalidine at the N atom
butylamine indicated
(band
when with
a) Schiff base + protected tyrosine (1:l) ( V C=N band masked by the intense band of the protecting groups, b) Schiff base + phenol (l:l), c) Schiff base + 2,4d) Schiff base + 2,3,5-tricholodichlorophenol (1:1), phenol (i:ll, e) Schiff base + pentachlorophenol (l:l), f) Schiff base + 2,4,6-trini'rophenol (l:J), q) Schiff base + HCl (1:l).
the pKa values In fig.2a of
the
the
+ phenol
of
base occurs
of
atApKa
the Schiff
phenols
2500 cm
bonds o-...
of the
begin -1
according
with
and extend
are taken
(PT)
is
to Huyskens show that
50% transfer
plotted
of
with
the proton
from ref.(ll). as
function
(151,
-log
KpT
the
Schiff
base
to the Schiff
= 5.5.
of
the Schiff
spectra
of
Schiff
base + 2,3,5
towards
These continua
H+N bonds in these
the complexes
structure smaller
characteristic demonstrate systems
with
in fig.3b those
IR continua in the region
wave numbers. for (2)-(6)
show large
807
trichlorophenol
system
base shows that
a band-like
is particularly (6).
transfer
base + pentachlorophenol
or the pure
continua
in ~01.2
Both plots
Ccl4
50%
IR spectra
a comparison
feature
therhpK,. in
given
proton
and in fig.2b,
systems
In the
phenols
percentage
ApK,,
as function
and
of the
phenol that proton
This
of
and
3c
the pure
occur.
These
3000 spectral
- amine hydrogen the OH***N Z polarizabilities.
Vol. 99, No. 3,198l
BIOCHEMICAL
2
numbers of
(c)-(f)
b,
~~~c&-I
is
the protons
of
of
fluctuate
shows the
at
in
demonstrates
izability This
tentials ing.
The position
be determined band of
in
of this
the protecting
it
as
groups
base + protected having
groupings.
the
transfer
808
large
and
bonds.
systems
the
tyrosine
protecting
In this
spectrum
intense.
but
This
polar-
above.
the proton
discussed
equilibrium
in
re-
tyrosine
this
discussed
shape of
base systems
(fig.la).
weight,
not very
polarizability
with
since
proton
0-q **H+N bonds between
than with
system
both
is
tyrosine
proton
the proton
that
is much less
the OH.+.N g
- Schiff
fact
the Schiff
but
in good agreement
in tyrosine
constant)
of asymmetry
i.e.,
base show still
is
theApKa
bonds have noticeable
hydrogen
of
observed that
the
andOt'-amino
is much smaller
result
degree
spectrum
still
and the Schiff
with
ethylester),
is
of
equilibrium
hydrogen
these
itsa-carboxylate
a continuum sult
the
1 .
AUK a
these
systems
(N-acetyl-L-tyrosine groups
transfer
the
in good agreement
these
Fig.3a
in fig.
systems
Percentage proton transfer as function (UK, protonated base - pKa phenol)
structures
i.e .,with
the
COMMUNICATIONS
AMa
a)
result
limiting
RESEARCH
b
(proton
This
BIOPHYSICAL
A*a
a
Fig.
AND
po-
the follow-
cannot
directly
?/C=N is masked by an intense TheApK,
value
in this
sys-
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 99, No. 3.1981
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
Wave number Fig.
3
IR spectra
of
solutions
(layer
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
cm-’
thickness
50 )Im)
a) Solutions in CH2C12; *** pure Schiff base (0.5 --pure protected tyrosine (0.5 M), Schiff (0.5 M) + protected tyrosine (0.5 M)
M), base
b)
Solutions in CC14; ... pure Schiff base (0.5 M), --pure 2,3,5 - trichlorophenol (0.5 M), Schiff base (0.5 M) + 2,3,5 trichlorophenol (0.5 M)
c)
Solutions in CC1 . m.. pure Schiff --- pentachloropffenol (0.2 Ml; -+ pentachlorouhenol (0.5 ".)
base (0.5 M), Schiff base (0.5
M)
Vol. 99, No. 3,198l
tern,
BIOCHEMICAL
however,
amounts
the non-polar Thus,
proton
in the
the proton Schiff
I:1
BIOPHYSICAL
to -4.34.Usinq limiting
mixture
this
structure
RESEARCH
value,
is much larger
at the
fiq.2a
OH. ..N
in CH2C12 solution
COMMUNICATIONS
shows that
has much larger
the residence
tyrosine
than
at
weight.
time
the N-atom
of
of the
base.
III.
CONCLUSIONS With
retinylidene
50% transfer
of
Schiff
polarizability With tem is
when these
regard
much larger
cal
of
Schiff This Schiff
are
at the
still
If
between
Schiff
of this
largely
This
polarizability.
Thus,
is
due to the
bond can be shifted
to
base + tyrosine
time
local
is
of the
hydrogen
by the
present proton
is
bond shows, property,
polarity
fields,
the tyrosine
sys-
the OH.**N e
Due to this
influenced
proton
symmetrical.
system
residence
residues.
equilibrium
show large
Schiff
this
The OH-.*N.$
base and tyrosine
the
tyrosine
proton
in
1:1 in CC14,
= 5.5.
systems
the
interest.
the poof the
the proton
residue
as to
lo-
in this the
base. explains
the result
base + p-cresol o-. ..H+N
structure
O-..
(16)-(19)
that
of p-cresol)
in
.H+N, since in hydrogen environments
the
of Kristoforov
system
equilibrium
caused by polar
structure
systems
systems,
a,~pK~"%
in these
low polarity,
environments.
hydrogen
at
to bacteriorhodopsin
of particular
in a solvent
sition
occurs
bonds found
0-a **H+N bond formed
however,
base + phenol
the proton
o-. . .H+N hydrogen
F
AND
equilibria
it
additional
favor
of
et
al.(l)
p-cresol
the polar
that shifts
proton
in the the OH-.-N
limiting
is known from many publications bonds with (in
great
proton
ref.(l)
addition
are shifted
in favor
B;*"H+B2.
810
(5) (6)
polarizability of large of
amounts
the polar
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 99, No. 3,1981
Oesterhelt the residue
and Lemke (11) tyr
Our molecular rhodopsin thesis of
step
could
model built
this
the
is
residue
than
since, the
hydrogen
bacteriorhodopsin structure. of bacterio-
may suggest
becomes deprotonated show that
this
Schiff
time
in the
tyrosine
when the environment
residence
the
of this
of the proton at
the
hypofirst
residue
base when the
bonds is much greater
at the Schiff
COMMUNICATIONS
the structure
by the protonated
too polar,
base - tyrosine
to
Our results
formed,
with
et a1.(20)
residue
photocycle.
M412
bond is not
according
tyrosine
RESEARCH
in the chromophoric
by Ovchinnikov
be reprotonated
mediate
have shown that
26 may be involved
evaluated
that
AND BIOPHYSICAL
interhydrogen
in Schiff tyrosine
base.
EXPERIMENTAL PART N-all-trans-retinylidene the procedure tyrosine, Serva,
given
i.e.,
IR-measurements:
solvents
For all
Retinal,
as well
ethylester
measurements
thickness
were compensated
according
to
as the protected were purchased
a cell
was used.
by a cell
with
beam. The measurements
spectrophotometer,
Uberlingen,
was prepared
from
West Germany.
50 um layer
in the reference Elmer
in ref.(l).
N-acetyl-L-tyrosine
Heidelberg,
windows with
butylamine
model 325,
with
sodium chloride
The IR bands of
adjustable
layer
were performed
Bodenseewerk
the
thickness
with
a Perkin
Perkin-Elmer,
West Germany.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Our thanks are due to the Humboldt Foundation for a grant conferred on Dr. P. P. Rastogi. Furthermore our thanks are due to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie for providing the facilities for this work.
REFERENCES 1. v. L. Kristoforov, Obshchei Khim. 2,
E. N. Zvonkova and R. P. Evstigneeva, 909-913 (1974).
811
Zh.
Vol. 99, No. 3,198l
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
2. E. G. Weidemann and G. Zundel, (1970).
Z. Naturforschuny
3. R. Janoschek, E. G. Weidemann, Amer. Chem. Sot. 2, 2387-2396
H. Pfeiffer ‘/1972).
COMMUNICATIONS
2,
627-634
and G. Zundel,
J.
4. G. Zundel, in "The Hydrogen Bond - Recent Developments in Theory and Experimentsn, P. Schuster, G. Zundel und C. Sandorfy eds., II, North Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam 1976, pp. 683-766. Vol
l
5. R. Lindemann and G. Zundel, 788-803 (1977). 6.
G. Zundel
and A. Nagyrevi,
J.
7. W. Kristof and G. Zundel, 225 (1980). 8.
U. Ch. Fischer
9. P. E. Blats, 848-855
Faraday
Chem. 82,
Biophys.
H. Mohler
Struct.
Trans.
685-689
Mechanism.
Biophys.
J.
28,
and H. V. Navangul,
and D. Oesterhelt, and H.-D.
H. H. M. De Pont, Biochem. Biophys.
13. J. T. Edsall, Sci. USA 44, J,
Phys.
and D. Oesterhelt, J.
11. D. Oesterhelt
14.
Chem. Sot.,
II
73,
(1978). 5,
211-230
Biochemistry
209(1979). 11,
(1972).
10. U. Ch. Fischer
12. J. J. Arch.
J.
Lemke,
J.
Europ.
J. 31, Chem.,
B. R. Hollinworth,
Drahonovski and Z. Vacek, (1971). and Th.
36, R. Lindemann 1285-1304 -17, Jadkyn
Collect.
Czech.
Zeegers-Huyskens,
and G. Zundel, (1978).
and J. Masecki,
J.
18.
M. Schreiber, A. Koll and L. Ser. Sci. Chim. 26, 657-654 and G. Zundel,
J.
Biopolymers
17.
Fritsch
(1980).
in press.
Proc.
Natl.
Acad.
(1958).
3431-3440
15. P. Huyskens (1964).
139-146
F. J. M. Daemen and S. L. Bonting, 140, 267-274 (1970).
R. B. Martin, 505-518
Biophys.
Acta
J.
Chem. COmm. -36,
Chim. 2,
Phys.
Polon.
Sobczyk,
Bull.
Phys.
61,
2407-2418 w, Acad.
(19771,
599-616
Polon.
(1978).
19.
J.
Phys.
20.
Yu. A, Ovchinnikov, N. G. Abdulaev, M. Ju. Kiselev and N. A. Lobanov, FEBS Lett. 100,
812
Chem. (1981). Feiqina, 219-224
81-86
A. V. (1979).
(3972). Sci.