Accepted Manuscript
Psychological and Electrophysiological Indices of Inattention in Hoarding Peter A. Baldwin , Thomas J. Whitford , Jessica R. Grisham PII: DOI: Reference:
S0165-1781(18)31006-0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.11.009 PSY 11865
To appear in:
Psychiatry Research
Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:
1 June 2018 3 October 2018 5 November 2018
Please cite this article as: Peter A. Baldwin , Thomas J. Whitford , Jessica R. Grisham , Psychological and Electrophysiological Indices of Inattention in Hoarding, Psychiatry Research (2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.11.009
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights
Hoarding individuals report elevated attention-deficit/hyperactivity symptoms.
Attentional symptoms most related to hoarding severity.
Neural marker of inattention not abnormal in hoarding individuals.
AC
CE
PT
ED
M
AN US
CR IP T
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Psychological and Electrophysiological Indices of Inattention in Hoarding
Peter A. Baldwin1 Thomas J. Whitford1
1
CR IP T
Jessica R. Grisham1
School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney.
AN US
Correspondence regarding this article should be directed to Peter A. Baldwin. Postal address: School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. Email:
AC
CE
PT
ED
M
[email protected].
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
3
Abstract Individuals with elevated hoarding symptoms report elevated symptoms of ADHD and these symptoms are related to impaired daily functioning. Neuropsychological studies have found specific deficits in attention, and a recent review of attentional data from numerous hoarding studies concluded that inattention likely represents an etiological factor in
CR IP T
hoarding, rather than a comorbidity. Our study aimed to examine which symptoms of ADHD, inattention or hyperactivity, are related to hoarding symptom severity, and whether
individuals with hoarding symptoms display a neurophysiological marker of poor attention (Theta/Beta Ratio; THBR) that might explain these associations. The THBR indexes theta
AN US
power relative to beta power in the frontal cortex and is often atypical in individuals with ADHD. We hypothesised that individuals would report more severe problems with inattention and would exhibit an elevated theta/beta ratio relative to a healthy control group.
M
We also predicted that any relationship between hoarding and inattention would be independent of anxiety and depression symptoms. 17 hoarding-symptomatic participants and
ED
16 healthy control participants completed self-report measures relating to ADHD, hoarding
PT
and general psychopathology, and then underwent resting measures of electroencephalography (EEG). Individuals with hoarding symptoms reported greater
CE
difficulties with inattention and hyperactivity, however they did not exhibit an elevated theta/beta ratio. When taking into account recent anxiety and depression, only inattention
AC
predicted hoarding symptom severity. Further investigations may help clarify this association and help inform attention-based treatments for hoarding. Key Words
Hoarding
ADHD
Attention
EEG
Declarations
AC
CE
PT
ED
M
AN US
Declarations of interest: none
CR IP T
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
5
Psychological and Physiological Indices of Inattention in Hoarding For people who experience hoarding difficulties, everyday decisions about acquiring, storing and discarding possessions cause substantial distress. (Frost et al., 2011; Grisham et al., 2007; Hall et al., 2012; Mackin et al., 2015). The impact of hoarding is wide-ranging and severe. Prevalence estimates of clinically significant hoarding range from 1.5 – 5%
CR IP T
depending on how hoarding is measured (Bulli et al., 2013; Iervolino et al., 2009; Mueller et al., 2009; Timpano et al., 2011) and difficulty discarding possessions is associated with
severe psychosocial dysfunction (Rodriguez et al., 2013b; Samuels et al., 2008; Tolin et al., 2008).
AN US
People who hoard often face complex health and safety concerns. Dwellings can
buckle under the weight of accumulation, resulting in potentially life-threatening health, structural and fire hazards (Frost et al., 2000). Beyond the consequences of clutter, hoarding
M
is associated with low socioeconomic status, severe work impairment (Frost and Gross, 1993; Samuels et al., 2007), high levels of psychiatric comorbidity (Frost et al., 2011; Hall et al.,
ED
2012) and cognitive deficits that can further complicate decision-making about belongings
PT
(Grisham et al., 2007; 2010; Tolin et al., 2011). Across recent hoarding studies, evidence has emerged that people who hoard
CE
experience difficulties with attention (e.g., Frost et al., 2011; Grisham et al., 2007; Hall et al., 2012; Mackin et al., 2015). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) comorbidity
AC
appears in 28-32% of individuals with clinically significant hoarding (Frost et al., 2011; Hartl et al., 2005) and is associated with greater difficulties in daily living, higher levels of stress and increased domestic squalor (Hall et al., 2012). Neuropsychological studies have found specific deficits in attention, along with related impairments in executive functioning (Blom et al., 2011; Grisham et al., 2007; Luchian et al., 2007; Mackin et al., 2010; Tolin et al., 2011; Wincze et al., 2007). fMRI data suggest that individuals with hoarding difficulties display
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
6
atypical function of the precentral gyrus (Tolin et al., 2012a; 2012b), a pattern also observed in some ADHD cohorts (Ding et al., 2014; Ernst et al., 2003). Taken together, these studies suggest that impaired attention may exacerbate hoarding symptoms. Inattention in some individuals with hoarding difficulties may be accounted for by ADHD comorbidity, however the weight of evidence suggests that the two disorders share
CR IP T
etiological similarities. Individuals with childhood ADHD appear more likely to develop hoarding symptoms that those without (Fullana et al, 2009), suggesting a predictive
relationship between inattention and hoarding. Additionally, data suggest that inattention in individuals with hoarding difficulties is present in childhood (Hartl et al., 2005) and predicts
AN US
hoarding across adulthood, unlike hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms (Hacker et al., 2012). These findings suggest that problems with attention in individuals with hoarding difficulties likely precede difficulties with discarding or acquiring.
M
Lynch and colleagues (2015) conducted a systematic review of the literature on executive function in individuals with hoarding difficulties to clarify why ADHD and
ED
hoarding appear to be linked. The authors ruled out methodological explanations and
PT
concluded that the two disorders likely shared neurophysiological and neuropsychological vulnerabilities, such as similar patterns of frontal lobe dysfunction. This proposition is
CE
supported by observations from Frost and colleagues (2011) and Tolin and Villavicencio (2011) that while a significant number of individuals with hoarding difficulties report
AC
impaired attention, relatively few meet criteria for hyperactivity-related ADHD. Indeed, despite consistent evidence linking inattention and hoarding, evidence for impulsivity or hyperactivity on standardised laboratory tasks is mixed (Grisham et al., 2007; Hacker et al., 2012; Rasmussen et al., 2013). Neuropsychological data suggest that specific components of attention are impaired in individuals with hoarding difficulties (Grisham et al., 2007; Mackin et al., 2015; Tolin et al.,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
7
2011). Two earlier studies found that some people who hoard show deficits on tests of sustained attention (Grisham et al., 2007; Tolin et al., 2011), such as the Conner’s Continuous Performance Test (CCPT; Conners, 2014). Poor discrimination of target stimuli from distractors on the CCPT by individuals with hoarding difficulties (Mackin et al., 2015) could reflect emerging evidence of abnormal anterior cingulate (ACC) function in this cohort, given
CR IP T
the role of the ACC in error vigilance (Baldwin et al., 2016; Mathews et al., 2015).
Inattention may also explain the observed executive deficits in hoarding cohorts. One study found that individuals with hoarding difficulties displayed poor probabilistic decision-making on the Iowa Gambling Task (Bechara, Damásio, Damásio and Anderson, 1994) relative to
AN US
healthy individuals (Lawrence et al., 2006), although others have failed to replicate this finding (Blom et al., 2011; Grisham et al., 2007; Tolin et al., 2011). More consistently,
studies have found that hoarding-symptomatic individuals struggle with categorising objects,
M
tending toward an under-inclusive categorisation style (Grisham et al., 2007; Luchian et al., 2007; Wincze et al., 2007), with categorisation deficits most prominent when using visual
ED
information (Mackin et al., 2015). Notably, these categorisation processes rely on focused
PT
and sustained attention (Sarter et al., 2001). Emerging evidence suggests that directly targeting inattention may augment hoarding
CE
treatment. Early data suggest that hoarding symptoms respond to Methylphenidate – a staple in pharmacological ADHD treatment – although the side-effect profile may be poor tolerated
AC
(Rodriguez et al., 2013a). Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for hoarding yields large reductions in difficulty discarding but does not address all hoarding symptoms equally (Tolin et al., 2015). A new approach to treating hoarding is combining CBT with cognitive remediation techniques like those used with individuals with neurological disease or injury. Early trials of this approach suggest that cognitive remediation for can enhance CBT for hoarding and directly address neuropsychological difficulties, with notable gains in
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
8
attentional symptoms (Ayers et al., 2014; DiMauro et al., 2014a). These studies add impetus to continued research into the role of inattention in individuals with hoarding difficulties. The neurophysiological bases of hoarding behaviour increasingly inform our understanding of hoarding as a disorder (Grisham and Baldwin, 2015), however hoarding research is yet to examine neural markers of inattention similar to those examined in ADHD
CR IP T
research. For example, EEG studies of children with ADHD reliably find elevated
frontocentral theta band power (4-6Hz) and lower beta band power (13-21Hz), leading to the development of the Theta/Beta Ratio (THBR) as prognostic indicator of inattention in
children with ADHD (Arns et al., 2013; Barry et al., 2009; 2003; Loo et al., 2013). The
AN US
THBR appears to also be elevated in some adults with ADHD and associated with inattention (Bresnahan et al., 1999; Clarke et al., 2011), although in a recent adult ADHD sample (Loo et al., 2013) adults demonstrated a lowered THBR. Interestingly, Loo et al. (2013) found that
M
the presence of depression mediated and moderated the presentation of THBR in their adult sample and proposed that comorbidity may affect THBR expression. The sensitivity of the
ED
THBR to depression speaks to the importance of considering psychiatric comorbidity in any
PT
investigation of inattention.
In sum, the research to date strongly suggests that inattention in hoarding warrants
CE
further investigation. Given that inattention often accompanies more severe impairment in individuals with hoarding difficulties (Frost et al., 2011; Hall et al., 2012), and may underpin
AC
some of the cognitive deficits that maintain disorganisation in hoarding (Grisham et al., 2007; Luchian et al., 2007; Mackin et al., 2015; Wincze et al., 2007), understanding inattention in hoarding could expand both theory and treatment. There is little research comparing inattention in individuals with hoarding difficulties with healthy individuals, and no previous studies have examined neural markers of inattention in hoarding a cohort. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare individuals with clinically significant hoarding to a group of
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
9
age-matched healthy individuals with respect to both self-reported ADHD symptoms and a physiological indicator of inattention. Given the reliable data implicating inattentive symptoms in hoarding, but the inconsistent findings regarding hyperactivity and impulsivity, our first hypothesis was that a group of individuals with hoarding difficulties would report higher inattention symptoms on
CR IP T
an adult ADHD measure than a healthy comparison group but would not report higher
hyperactive or impulsive symptoms. As most previous research suggests that an elevated THBR may be a marker of inattention in adults, our second hypothesis was that individuals with hoarding difficulties would exhibit a higher THBR relative to healthy individuals. We
AN US
also predicted that any relationship between hoarding and inattention would be independent of recent symptoms of depression and anxiety.
M
Method
ED
Sample
Participants with clinically significant hoarding difficulties were recruited via
PT
community advertising. Eligibility for inclusion in the hoarding group required the likely presence of hoarding disorder (HD) as indicated by the Hoarding Rating Scale Interview
CE
(Tolin et al., 2010), along with an absence of brain injury, neurological disease or recent
AC
psychosis. Of the 58 individuals who responded to the advertising, 27 met our eligibility criteria. Of these 27, two participants were excluded because they expressed current suicidality during their clinical interview. Eight participants were excluded for failure to follow instructions during psychophysiological recording, resulting in compromised data. The final hoarding group contained 17 participants (8 females). Of this group, 11 participants identified as Caucasian Australian, and 6 participants identified as Asian or Subcontinental. With respect to education, 12 participants reported university undergraduate qualifications, 4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
10
participants reported qualifications from vocational or technical colleges, and 1 participant reported no tertiary education. Participants for the healthy comparison group were recruited via community advertising and were excluded if they reported a history of brain injury, stroke, neurological disease, or current problems with mood, anxiety or hoarding. Of the 26 individuals who
CR IP T
responded, 19 were eligible to participate. Participants were excused if they reported current problems with mood or anxiety during the diagnostic interview (n=2). In addition, 1
participant was excluded for failure to follow instructions during psychophysiological
recording, resulting in compromised data. The final healthy group contained 8 females and 8
AN US
males. Of this group, 8 participants identified as Caucasian Australian, and 8 participants identified as Asian or Subcontinental. With respect to education, 3 participants reported postgraduate qualifications, 7 participants reported undergraduate qualifications, 4
M
participants reported qualifications from vocational or technical colleges, and 2 participants
PT
Self-Report Measures
ED
reported no tertiary education. Descriptive statistics for both groups are presented in Table 1.
Saving Inventory-Revised (SI-R). The SI-R is a 23-item self-report measure of
CE
hoarding behaviour that yields three subscales that measure excessive acquisition, difficulty discarding and clutter. The SI-R has repeatedly demonstrated excellent internal consistency,
AC
construct validity and test-retest reliability (Frost et al., 2004). In the present sample, the internal consistency was high ( = .97). Saving Cognition Inventory (SCI). The SCI (Steketee et al., 2003) is a 24-item self-
report measure of the beliefs individuals hold about their possessions in terms of emotional comfort, memory, control of possessions, and responsibility for possessions. The SCI has
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
11
previously demonstrated high internal consistency (Steketee et al., 2003). In the present sample, the internal consistency for the SCI was high ( = .97). Hoarding Rating Scale – Interview (HRS-I). The HRS-I (Tolin et al., 2010) is a 5item structured interview that measures the severity of hoarding difficulties across 5 domains that mirror the DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) criteria for HD. The HRS
CR IP T
yields a total score and a score profile used to determine if the reported hoarding difficulties reflect HD. The HRS shows high internal consistency and predictive validity with more detailed hoarding measures (Tolin et al., 2018). In the present sample, the internal
AN US
consistency for the HRS-I was high ( = .87).
Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview Version 6 (MINI-6). The MINI-6 is a diagnostic interview that assesses the extent to which an individual meets DSM-IV TR criteria for major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, generalised anxiety
M
disorder, social anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder, psychosis, suicidality, and anti-social personality disorder (Sheehan et al., 1998). The MINI-6 has been validated against longer
ED
and more established diagnostic interviews (e.g. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV
PT
TR; First et al., 2002) and demonstrates excellent convergent validity with such measures. Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale Version 1.1 (ASRS). The ASRS (Kessler et al.,
CE
2005) is an 18-item self-report measure of the severity with which an individual has experienced each of the 18 DSM-IV TR criteria for ADHD over the previous 6 months. The
AC
ASRS provides a weighted scoring algorithm to determine which of an individual's symptoms are clinically severe, and of those, which best predict an ADHD diagnosis. As each question maps onto a DSM criterion, a score for inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity can be computed from the relevant scale items. The ASRS has been validated against the World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview for ADHD
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
12
and demonstrates sound predictive validity (Kessler et al., 2005). In the present sample, internal consistency was high ( = .87). Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21). The DASS-21 (Lovibond and S. H. Lovibond, 1995) is a 21-item self-report measure of psychological distress experienced in the past week, rated across three dimensions: depression, anxiety and stress. The DASS-21 has
CR IP T
demonstrated excellent internal consistency across previous samples (=.91-.96; Brown et al., 1997; Nieuwenhuijsen et al., 2003), and yields a total score of general distress and three subscales that measure depression, anxiety or stress. In the present sample, internal
AN US
consistency was high ( = .89).
Electrophysiological Measures and Data Reduction
EEG data were collected using a BioSemi ActiView system (Biosemi, 2012) and analysed using Brain Vision Analyzer v2.0 (Brain Products GmBH, 2012). Data for two
M
studies were collected within each participant session, therefore we used a 64- channel
ED
electrode cap with Ag/Ag-Cl electrodes referenced to internal sensors in the parietal lobe (CMS/DRL) to maximise the available data for both studies. During pre-processing, data
PT
were referenced offline to the average of mastoid electrodes. Electrodes were positioned per
CE
the 10-20 system, and a sampling rate of 2048 Hz was used. Electrodes at the outer canthi of both eyes and over the left orbicular oculi muscle measured eye blink and movement (vertical
AC
and horizontal electrooculogram). Data were band-pass filtered at 0.05 – 30 Hz with a phase-shift free Butterworth filter
to attenuate high and low frequency noise. EEG was corrected for blink and eye movement using the regression-based algorithm developed by (Gratton et al., 1983). Data were then segmented into eyes-open and eyes-closed 5-minute epochs, based on markers inserted during data acquisition. Filtered and corrected epochs were then Fourier-transformed using a Hamming window covering the full 5-minute epoch to segment the data into frequency
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
bands. Absolute power (V2/Hz) in both the theta (3.5 Hz–7.5 Hz) and beta (12.5 Hz–25 Hz) frequency bands was computed at Cz per previous THBR studies (e.g. Loo et al., 2013) for each epoch, and the THBR was calculated as the ratio of theta power to beta power.
Procedure
CR IP T
Participants completed questionnaires, then undertook a structured diagnostic
interview using the MINI-6 with the first author. Next, participants were set up on the
psychophysiological equipment and two resting EEG epochs were recorded: a 5-minute
epoch with participant’s eyes open, and a 5-minute epoch with participant’s eyes closed.
AN US
Finally, participants received a verbal debrief and monetary compensation.
Data Analyses
M
All analyses were conducted in SPSS v21 (IBM, 2012). Between-group differences were assessed using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Linear relationships
ED
between ADHD symptoms and hoarding symptoms were assessed using hierarchical multiple regression. Normality was confirmed using the z-score procedure outlined by Field (2009)
PT
and homogeneity of variance was confirmed using Levene’s (1960) test. The absence of
CE
multicollinearity was confirmed by inspecting the variance proportions of each eigenvalue in the full model to establish that no two variables demonstrated high loadings on any single
AC
eigenvalue.
Results
Sample Characteristics Within our hoarding group, ten participants met DSM-IV TR (APA, 2000) criteria for lifetime major depressive disorder, six participants met DSM-IV TR criteria for lifetime
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
14
panic disorder, and four participants met DSM-IV TR criteria for social anxiety. Three participants reported current selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) pharmacotherapy and one participant reported current tricyclic pharmacotherapy. To ensure the groups were matched for age and differed as expected on psychological measures of hoarding, depression and anxiety, we conducted a MANOVA comparing groups
CR IP T
on age, SIR, SCI and DASS depression and anxiety scores. Relative to the healthy group, the hoarding group reported clinically significant hoarding symptoms, well above theclinical cutoff score of 41 for the SI-R total, which has been used to distinguish between hoarding and non-hoarding populations for both research (Novara, Bottesi, Dorz, and Sanavio, 2016) and
AN US
clinical purposes (Steketee and Frost, 2014). Hoarding cognitions were within established clinical ranges (Steketee, Frost, and Kyrios, 2003) and psychological distress was in the Severe range (Lovibond and Lovibond, 1995). Descriptive and MANOVA statistics are
AC
CE
PT
ED
M
presented in Table 1.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
15
Table 1 Descriptive and MANOVA Statistics Comparing Group Means for Age and Psychological Variables Mean (SD)
F
p
2
Control
Age
47.8 (13.1)
49.6 (9.8)
.186
.669
.006
SIR-Total
49.4 (14.1)
17.2 (12.2)
49.199
.000*
.613
SCI-Total
129.6 (43.2)
74.6 (29.4)
17.984
.000*
.367
DASS-D
11.8 (13.7)
4.6 (5.3)
3.793
.061
.109
DASS-A
9.8 (10.6)
2.3 (3.2)
7.614
.009*
.197
CR IP T
Hoarding
AN US
Note. DASS-A = Depression Anxiety Stress Scales Anxiety Symptoms; DASS-D = Depression Anxiety Stress Scales Depression Symptoms; SCI = Saving Cognitions Inventory; SIR = Saving Inventory Revised. * indicates significant at p<0.01
Between-Group Analyses
M
Self-reported ADHD symptoms. To test the hypothesis that the hoarding group
ED
would report more severe inattention but not hyperactivity or impulsivity symptoms than the control group, we conducted a MANOVA comparing ASRS inattention, hyperactivity and
PT
impulsivity scores between groups. As predicted, the hoarding group reported more severe inattention symptoms, however they also reported more severe hyperactivity symptoms.
CE
Groups did not differ with respect to impulsivity symptoms.
AC
The ASRS segments scale items into those most predictive of an ADHD diagnosis (Part A), and those less predictive of diagnosis but relevant to clinical presentation (Part B). To determine if the hoarding group endorsed a greater number of symptoms predictive of ADHD that the control group, we conducted a MANOVA comparing scores on ASRS Part A and Part B across groups. Individuals in the hoarding group endorsed a greater number of both Part A and Part B symptoms than control individuals. Part A symptoms were below
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
16
levels associated with ADHD diagnosis, however Part B symptoms were within diagnostic range (14-24; Kessler et al., 2007). Theta-Beta ratio. To test the hypothesis that individuals in the hoarding group would exhibit a lowered THBR relative to healthy individuals, we conducted a MANOVA to compare THBR across groups under both eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. Both groups
CR IP T
showed a mean THBR within the range typically found in healthy individuals (M = 3.86, SD = 2.27; Arns, Conners, and Kraemer, 2013). Counter to prediction, the observed betweengroup differences in THBR were not significant. Descriptive and parametric statistics for all
Table 2
AN US
three MANOVAs are presented in Table 2.
MANOVA Statistics Comparing Group Means on ASRS and THBR Mean (SD)
2
F
p
21.131
.000*
.413
Control
ASRS-Att
18.75 (5.12)
12.06 (2.77)
ASRS-Hyp
9.94 (3.94)
6.56 (2.75)
7.881
.009*
.208
ASRS-Imp
4.75 (2.74)
3.56 (2.52)
1.620
.213
.051
ASRS-Part A
12.00 (4.17)
6.25 (2.11)
21.33
.000*
.408
20.75 (8.68)
13.56 (3.54)
9.511
.004*
.235
ED
PT
CE
ASRS-Part B
M
Hoarding
2.65 (.40)
3.15 (.48)
.471
.493
.011
THBR-EC
2.25 (.71)
2.32 (.68)
.112
.741
.001
AC
THBR-EO
Note. ASRS-IA = Adult ADHD Self Report Scale Inattention Symptoms; ASRS-HY = Adult ADHD Self Report Scale Hyperactivity Symptoms; ASRS-IM = Adult ADHD Self Report Scale Impulsivity Symptoms; ASRS-Part A = ASRS Part A Total Score; ASRS-Part B = ASRS Part B Total Score; THBR-EO = Theta/Beta Ratio Eyes Open; THBR-EC = Theta/Beta Ratio Eyes Closed. * indicates significant at p<0.01
Regression Analyses Although groups differed on both inattention and hyperactivity symptoms, this may have been confounded by the presence of anxiety and depression symptoms. Our quasi-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
17
experimental design precluded the use of ANCOVA to remove the influence that other psychiatric symptoms may have on between-group differences in ADHD symptoms (Miller and Chapman, 2001). Therefore, to test the hypothesis that any relationship between hoarding and inattention would be independent of problems with anxiety or mood, we computed a hierarchical regression model predicting hoarding symptoms from ADHD symptoms while
CR IP T
holding constant recent anxiety and depression symptoms across the full sample. In the first step of the model, we entered DASS-depression and DASS-anxiety scores. Next, we entered each of the ASRS subscale scores as simultaneous predictors of SIR-total scores. Holding constant recent anxiety and depression symptoms, only inattention symptoms remained a
Table 3
AN US
significant predictor of hoarding symptoms (see Table 3).
Hierarchical Regression Predicting Hoarding Symptoms from ADHD Symptoms
t
p
R2
R2 change
.306
1.043
.306
.253
-
.218
.745
.462
.275
1.019
.318
.459
.206*
DASS-A
-.235
-.780
.443
ASRS-IA
.462
2.234
.034*
ASRS-HY
.327
1.170
.253
ASRS-IM
-.135
-.661
.514
Step 1
DASS-D DASS-A
PT
DASS-D
AC
CE
Step 2
ED
M
Note. Dependent variable = Saving Inventory Revised Total Score. ASRS-IA = Adult ADHD Self Report Scale Inattention Symptoms; ASRS-HY = Adult ADHD Self Report Scale Hyperactivity Symptoms; ASRS-IM = Adult ADHD Self Report Scale Impulsivity Symptoms; DASS-A = Depression Anxiety Stress Scales Anxiety Symptoms; DASS-D = Depression Anxiety Stress Scales Depression Symptoms; = standardised regression coefficient. * significant at p<.05
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
18
Discussion Our study aimed to compare the types of ADHD symptoms endorsed by individuals with clinically significant hoarding difficulties relative to healthy individuals, and to investigate if individuals with hoarding difficulties exhibit a neurophysiological marker of inattention. Previous literature suggests that hoarding and ADHD consistently share deficits
CR IP T
in attention but not hyperactivity or impulsivity, therefore we predicted that individuals with hoarding difficulties would report more severe inattention symptoms that healthy individuals, but not more severe symptoms of hyperactivity or impulsivity. We also predicted that
individuals with hoarding difficulties would exhibit a higher theta-beta ratio (THBR) than
AN US
healthy individuals, given the evidence linking elevated THBR with attentional deficits. Taking into consideration the potential for other psychiatric symptoms to explain the
relationship between hoarding and inattention, we predicted that the relationship between
M
hoarding and inattention symptoms would be independent of recent anxiety and depression. Our prediction regarding between-group differences in ADHD symptoms was
ED
partially supported. The hoarding group reported elevated inattention and hyperactivity
PT
symptoms relative to the control group, however there were no between-group differences in symptoms of impulsivity. The prediction regarding hoarding individuals exhibiting a
CE
neuropsychological indicator of inattention was not supported. The hoarding group did not differ from the healthy group in THBR. Our hypothesis regarding the relationship between
AC
hoarding and inattention symptoms independent of more general problems with anxiety and mood was supported. When recent anxiety and depression were held constant, only inattention predicted hoarding symptom severity. This suggests that the symptom differences observed between our groups may have been confounded by the presence of comorbid factors such as elevated anxiety or mood disturbance.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
19
These findings add to previous observations that individuals who hoard experience difficulties with inattention, and it seems increasingly unlikely that this reflects ADHD comorbidity. Though our hoarding group reported elevated symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity, only two group members reported a symptom profile consistent with an ADHD diagnosis. This parallels previous hoarding samples in which researchers found moderate to
CR IP T
severe levels of inattentive symptoms, but a relative absence of other aspects of ADHD (Frost et al., 2011; Tolin and Villavicencio, 2011). Additionally, when recent anxiety and
depression were taken into account in our analyses, inattention predicted hoarding symptom severity whereas hyperactivity did not. This echoes previous findings (Tolin and
AN US
Villavicencio, 2011) and further suggests that key features of ADHD, such as hyperactivity, are not consistently related to hoarding symptoms independent of other comorbidities. Given the apparent influence of comorbidity in our sample, one potential explanation
M
for absence of the hypothesised effect of the THBR may be the range and severity of depression symptoms reported by our sample. Though the between-group differences did not
ED
reach significance, the means suggested a trend for a THBR attenuation in our hoarding
PT
group. There is evidence that the THBR in ADHD adults may be attenuated in the presence of comorbid depression (Loo et al., 2013). On average, our hoarding participants reported
CE
severe depression symptoms, however there was substantial variation within the group. Additionally, depression symptoms were not a unique predictor of hoarding symptom
AC
severity. While depression is a common comorbidity in hoarding (Frost et al., 2011; Hall et al., 2012), individuals with hoarding difficulties demonstrate only mild to moderate depressive symptoms in some clinical samples (Grisham et al., 2005), and some epidemiological data suggest that the proportion of individuals reporting difficulty discarding who suffer from depressive illness is relatively low (18.27%; (Rodriguez et al., 2013b).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
20
Therefore, it is possible that heterogeneity of depression within our hoarding sample may have diluted the depressive symptomatology most associated with THBR attenuation. Though the role of different aspects of depression in THBR attenuation is unclear (Loo et al., 2013), specific depressive presentations can weaken other neurophysiological processes that also appear to be attenuated hoarding (Baldwin et al., 2016; Mathews et al., 2015; Weinberg
CR IP T
et al., 2015). The size of our sample precluded follow-up analyses to compare individuals with high and low depression, which may be an important consideration for future studies. A more detailed understanding of inattention in hoarding could improve the effects of treatment, particularly the latest approaches combining CBT with cognitive training. Early
AN US
evidence suggests that individuals with hoarding difficulties can benefit from cognitive remediation therapies, and that attentional symptoms respond particularly well to these
treatment approaches (Ayers et al., 2014; DiMauro, Genova, Tolin, and Kurtz, 2014). Though
M
cognitive remediation appears to have generalised effects on selective attention in individuals with hoarding difficulties (DiMauro et al., 2014b), neuropsychological data more strongly
ED
suggest deficits in sustained attention (Grisham et al., 2007; Mackin et al., 2015; Tolin et al.,
PT
2011). As such, it is unclear by what mechanism cognitive remediation might improve hoarding symptoms, and what the optimal targets of such therapies might be.
CE
Continued research into the neurocognitive underpinnings of inattention in hoarding may clarify such mechanisms. For example, dysfunction in the precentral gyrus during
AC
decision-making has been observed in both ADHD and individuals with hoarding difficulties, and is thought to impair focused attention by hindering environmental filtering (Ernst et al., 2003; Grisham and Baldwin, 2015). If future research can clarify this mechanism in HD, this might recommend that remedial treatments focus on boosting selective attention and facilitate attentional selection when making decisions about possessions.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
21
Clarifying the neural basis of inattention in hoarding may also help guide pharmacological treatments for HD. Both ADHD and hoarding are associated with anterior cingulate abnormalities during decision-making (Ernst et al., 2003; Grisham and Baldwin, 2015). Anterior cingulate dysfunction appears to impede the efficacy of some selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (Mayberg et al., 1997; Pizzagalli et al., 2001), which may
CR IP T
explain the differing rates of improvement in response to SSRI treatment across hoarding samples (Brakoulias et al., 2015). Serotonin-noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitor (SNRI) therapies shown effective for attentional symptoms in adults with ADHD (Findling,
Schwartz, Flannery, and Manos, 1996; Hedges, Reimherr, Rogers, Strong, and Wender,
AN US
1995) also appear to produce substantial clinical improvements in individuals with hoarding difficulties (Saxena, 2011; Saxena and Sumner, 2014). A trial of the gold-standard pharmacological intervention for ADHD, Methylphenidate (Ritalin), in individuals with
M
hoarding difficulties produced some promising clinical effects but was poorly tolerated (Rodriguez et al., 2013a). Both ADHD and hoarding appear to benefit from noradrenergic
ED
augmentation but it is unclear if the symptomatic relief observed in hoarding relates to
PT
normalisation of putative neural causes of inattention, as they appear to do in ADHD (Rubia et al., 2014); Swanson, Baler, and Volkow, 2011). By understanding the neural basis of
CE
inattention in hoarding we may better identify pharmacological agents that more effectively normalise impaired neural processes.
AC
The results of our study should be interpreted in the light of some limitations.
Resource demands, attrition and the availability of suitable participants ultimately limited our sample size. As such, our analyses were relatively underpowered and should be replicated in larger clinical samples before firmer conclusions are drawn. The ASRS is a well-established measure of ADHD symptoms, however its intended use as a diagnostic screening instrument limited the content validity of our investigation of inattention. Future studies should seek
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
22
broader measures of inattention, such as standardised behavioural tasks. Despite all participants meeting criteria for HD on the HRS-I, the severity of hoarding symptoms reported by our hoarding group was lower than that of other samples (Tolin et al., 2015; Williams and Viscusi, 2016). This may reflect slightly lower hoarding-related distress in a non-treatment-seeking cohort;, however replication of the present results in other hoarding
CR IP T
samples is important to strengthen inferences about inattention in hoarding. Participants’ level of fatigue and qualitative experience of participation was not assessed. As alertness may impact electrophysiological measures, future studies should incorporate such assessments. . Finally, as discussed, our sample size precluded any post-hoc examinations of how
AN US
the type and severity of depressive symptoms might explain the observed results, and the quasi-experimental design prevented the use of ANCOVA. Future studies might address this limitation by supplementing future comparison groups with individuals who report sub-
M
clinical depression, similar to the method employed by Miller, Chapman, Chapman, and Kwapil (1993). In this way, any attentional impairments exhibited by individuals with
ED
hoarding difficulties could reliably be inferred to be different from those observed in
PT
individuals with elevated depressive symptomatology. Despite these limitations, the current study advances our understanding of the overlap
CE
between ADHD and hoarding and presents many new avenues of enquiry. It appears increasingly likely that the relationship between these psychiatric syndromes reflects shared
AC
attentional impairments, which speaks more to aetiology than true comorbidity. Though our data failed to identify any neurophysiological basis for this overlap, many questions remain unanswered. By clarifying the neurophysiological underpinnings of attentional deficits in hoarding we may enhance emerging cognitive remediation therapies and refine pharmacotherapy protocols for hoarding. Considering the severe impact that hoarding has at
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
23
individual, familial and societal levels, increasing our understanding of why people hoard is a
AC
CE
PT
ED
M
AN US
CR IP T
crucial factor in lifting the burden of HD.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
24
Funding This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public,
AC
CE
PT
ED
M
AN US
CR IP T
commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
25
References
American Psychiatric Association, 2000. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders DSM-IV-TR Fourth Edition (Text Revision) Author: American Psychiatr. Amer Psychiatric Pub, Arlington VA. American Psychiatric Association, 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition. American Psychiatric Association, Arlington, VA.
CR IP T
Arns, M., Conners, C.K., Kraemer, H.C., 2013. A Decade of EEG Theta/Beta Ratio Research in ADHD: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Attention Disorders 17, 374–383. doi:10.1177/1087054712460087
Ayers, C.R., Saxena, S., Espejo, E., Twamley, E.W., Granholm, E., Wetherell, J.L., 2014. Novel Treatment for Geriatric Hoarding Disorder: An Open Trial of Cognitive
AN US
Rehabilitation Paired with Behavior Therapy. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 22, 248–252.
Baldwin, P.A., Whitford, T.J., Grisham, J.R., 2016. The Relationship between Hoarding Symptoms, Intolerance of Uncertainty, and Error-Related Negativity. J Psychopathol
M
Behav Assess 1–9. doi:10.1007/s10862-016-9577-3
Barry, R.J., Clarke, A.R., Johnstone, S.J., McCarthy, R., Selikowitz, M., 2009.
ED
Electroencephalogram θ/β Ratio and Arousal in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Evidence of Independent Processes. BPS 66, 398–401. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.04.027
PT
Barry, R.J., Johnstone, S.J., Clarke, A.R., 2003. A review of electrophysiology in attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder: II. Event-related potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology 114,
CE
184–198. doi:10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00363-2 Bechara, A., Damásio, A. R., Damásio, H., Anderson, S. W.,1994. Insensitivity to future
AC
consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition 50, 7–15. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3. PMID 8039375.
Blom, R.M., Samuels, J.F., Grados, M.A., Chen, Y., Bienvenu, O.J., Riddle, M.A., Liang, K.Y., Brandt, J., Nestadt, G., 2011. Cognitive functioning in compulsive hoarding. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 25, 1139–1144. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.08.005 Brakoulias, V., Eslick, G.D., Starcevic, V., 2015. A meta-analysis of the response of pathological hoarding to pharmacotherapy. Psychiatry Research 229, 272–276. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2015.07.019
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
26
Bresnahan, S.M., Anderson, J.W., Barry, R.J., 1999. Age-related changes in quantitative EEG in Attention- Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Biological Psychiatry 46, 1690–1697. Brown, T.A., Chorpita, B.F., Korotitsch, W., Barlow, D.H., 1997. Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples. Behavior Research and Therapy 35, 79–89. Bulli, F., Melli, G., Carraresi, C., Stopani, E., Pertusa, A., Frost, R.O., 2013. Hoarding Behaviour in an Italian Non-Clinical Sample. Behav. Cognit. Psychother. 42, 297–311.
CR IP T
doi:10.1017/S1352465812001105
Clarke, A.R., Barry, R.J., Dupuy, F.E., McCarthy, R., Selikowitz, M., Heaven, P.C.L., 2011. Childhood EEG as a predictor of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clinical Neurophysiology 122, 73–80. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.05.032
DiMauro, J., Genova, M., Tolin, D.F., Kurtz, M.M., 2014a. Cognitive remediation for
AN US
neuropsychological impairment in hoarding disorder_ A pilot study. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders 3, 132–138. doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2014.03.006
DiMauro, J., Genova, M., Tolin, D.F., Kurtz, M.M., 2014b. Cognitive remediation for
M
neuropsychological impairment in hoarding disorder_ A pilot study. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders 3, 132–138.
ED
doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2014.03.006
Ding, W.-N., Sun, J.-H., Sun, Y.-W., Chen, X., Zhou, Y., Zhuang, Z.-G., Li, L., Zhang, Y., Xu, J.-R., Du, Y.-S., 2014. Trait impulsivity and impaired prefrontal impulse inhibition
PT
function in adolescents with internet gaming addiction revealed by a Go/No-Go fMRI study 10, 1–9. doi:10.1186/1744-9081-10-20
CE
Ernst, M., Kimes, A.S., London, E.D., Matochik, J.A., Eldreth, D., Tata, S., Contoreggi, C., Leff, M., Bolla, K., 2003. Neural Substrates of Decision Making in Adults With
AC
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry 160, 1061– 1070.
Field, A., 2009. Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS (3rd Edition). Sage, London. First, M.B., Spitzer, R.L., Williams, J.B.W., 2002. Structured Clinical Interview for DSMIV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition. (SCID-I/P). Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York. Frost, R.O., Gross, R.C., 1993. The Hoarding of Possesions. Behaviour Research and Therapy 31, 367–381.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
27
Frost, R.O., Steketee, G., Grisham, J., 2004. Measurement of compulsive hoarding: saving inventory-revised. Behaviour Research and Therapy 42, 1163–1182. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2003.07.006 Frost, R.O., Steketee, G., Tolin, D.F., 2011. Comorbidity in hoarding disorder. Depress Anxiety 28, 876–884. doi:10.1002/da.20861 Frost, R.O., Steketee, G.S., Williams, L., 2000. Hoarding: A community health problem. Health and Social Care in the Community 8, 229–234.
CR IP T
Fullana M.A., Mataix-Cols, D., Caspi, A., Harrington, H., Grisham, J.R., Moffitt, T.E., Poulton, R., 2009. Obsessions and Compulsions in the Community: Prevalence,
Interference, Help-Seeking, Developmental Stability, and Co-Occurring Psychiatric Conditions. American Journal of Psychiatry 166, 329–336. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08071006
AN US
Gratton, G., Coles, M., Donchin, E., 1983. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology 55, 468–484.
Grisham, J., Baldwin, P., 2015. Neuropsychological and neurophysiological insights into hoarding disorder. NDT 11, 951–962. doi:10.2147/NDT.S62084
M
Grisham, J.R., Brown, T.A., Liverant, G.I., Campbell-Sills, L., 2005. The distinctiveness of compulsive hoarding from obsessive–compulsive disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders
ED
19, 767–779. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2004.09.003 Grisham, J.R., Brown, T.A., Savage, C.R., Steketee, G., Barlow, D.H., 2007. Neuropsychological impairment associated with compulsive hoarding. Behaviour
PT
Research and Therapy 45, 1471–1483. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2006.12.008 Grisham, J.R., Norberg, M.M., Williams, A.D., Certoma, S.P., Kadib, R., 2010.
CE
Categorization and cognitive deficits in compulsive hoarding. Behaviour Research and Therapy 48, 866–872. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2010.05.011
AC
Hacker, L.E., Park, J.M., Timpano, K.R., Cavitt, M.A., Alvaro, J.L., Lewin, A.B., Murphy, T.K., Storch, E.A., 2012. Hoarding in children with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders 1087054712455845.
Hall, B.J., Tolin, D.F., Frost, R.O., Steketee, G., 2012. An exploration of the comorbid symptoms and clinical correlates of clinically significant hoarding symptoms. Depress Anxiety 30, 67–76. doi:10.1002/da.22015 Hartl, T.L., Duffany, S., Allen, G., Steketee, G.S., Frost, R.O., 2005. Relationships among compulsive hoarding, trauma, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy 43, 269–276. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.02.002
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
28
Iervolino, A.C., Perroud, N., Fullana, M.A., Guipponi, M., Cherkas, L., Collier, D.A., Mataix-Cols, D., 2009. Prevalence and Heritability of Compulsive Hoarding: A Twin Study. American Journal of Psychiatry 166, 1156–1161. Kessler, R.C., Adler, L., Ames, M., Demler, O., 2005. The World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS): a short screening scale for use in the general population. Psychological …. doi:10.1017/S0033291704002892 Lawrence, N.S., Wooderson, S., Mataix-Cols, D., David, R., Speckens, A., Phillips, M.L.,
CR IP T
2006. Decision making and set shifting impairments are associated with distinct
symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neuropsychology 20, 409–419. Levene, H., 1960. Robust tests for equality of vairances, in: Olkin, I., Ghuyre, S.G., Madow, W.G., Mann, H.B. (Eds.), Contributions to Probability Statistics Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling. Stanford, CA.
AN US
Loo, S.K., Cho, A., Hale, T.S., McGough, J., McCracken, J., Smalley, S.L., 2013.
Characterization of the Theta to Beta Ratio in ADHD: Identifying Potential Sources of Heterogeneity. Journal of Attention Disorders 17, 384–392. doi:10.1177/1087054712468050
M
Lovibond, P.F., Lovibond, S.H., 1995. The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression
ED
and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy 33, 335–343. Lovibond, P.F., Lovibond, S.H., 1995. Manual for the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales, 2nd ed. Manual for the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales, 2nd ed. Psychological
PT
Foundation., Sydney.
Luchian, S., McNally, R., Hooley, J., 2007. Cognitive aspects of nonclinical obsessive–
CE
compulsive hoarding. Behaviour Research and Therapy 45, 1657–1662. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2006.08.014
AC
Lynch, F.A., McGillivray, J.A., Moulding, R., Byrne, L.K., 2015. Hoarding in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder_ Understanding the comorbidity. Journal of ObsessiveCompulsive and Related Disorders 4, 37–46. doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2014.12.001
Mackin, R.S., Areán, P.A., Delucchi, K.L., Mathews, C.A., 2010. Cognitive functioning in individuals with severe compulsive hoarding behaviors and late life depression. Int. J. Geriat. Psychiatry 26, 314–321. doi:10.1002/gps.2531 Mackin, R.S., Vigil, O., Insel, P., Kivowitz, A., Kupferman, E., Hough, C.M., Fekri, S., Crothers, R., Bickford, D., Delucchi, K.L., Mathews, C.A., 2015. Patterns of clinically
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
29
significant cognitive impairment in hoarding disorder. Depress Anxiety 00, 1–8. doi:10.1002/da.22439 Mathews, C.A., Perez, V.B., Roach, B.J., Fekri, S., Vigil, O., Kupferman, E., Mathalon, D.H., 2015. Error-related brain activity dissociates hoarding disorder from obsessivecompulsive disorder. Psychol. Med. TBA, TBA. doi:10.1017/S0033291715001889 Mayberg, H.S., Brannan, S.K., Mahurin, R.K., Jerabek, P.A., 1997. Cingulate function in depression: a potential predictor of treatment response. Clinical Neuroscience and
CR IP T
Neuropathology 8, 1057–1061.
Miller, G.M., Chapman, J.P., 2001. Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 110, 40–48. doi:10.1037//0021-843X.110.1.40
Mueller, A., Mitchell, J.E., Crosby, R.D., Glaesmer, H., De Zwaan, M., 2009. The prevalence of compulsive hoarding and its association with compulsive buying in a German
AN US
population-based sample. Behaviour research and … 47, 705–709. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.04.005
Nieuwenhuijsen, K., De Boer, A., Verbeek, J., Blonk, R.W.B., Van Dijk, F.J.H., 2003. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS): detecting anxiety disorder and depression in
M
employees absent from work because of mental health problems. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 60(Suppl I), i77–i88.
ED
Pizzagalli, D., Pascual-Marqui, R.D., Nitschke, J.B., Oakes, T.R., Larson, C.L., Abercrombie, H.C., Schaefer, S.M., Koger, J.V., Benca, R.M., Davidson, R.J., 2001. Anterior Cingulate Activity as a Predictor of Degree of Treatment Response in Major
PT
Depression: Evidence From Brain Electrical Tomography Analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry 158, 405–415. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.405
CE
Rasmussen, J.L., Brown, T.A., Steketee, G.S., Barlow, D.H., 2013. Impulsivity in hoarding. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders 2, 183–191.
AC
doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2013.02.004 Rodriguez, C.I., Bender, J., Jr, Morrison, S., 2013a. Does Extended Release Methylphenidate Help Adults with Hoarding Disorder? A Case Series. Journal of clinical …. doi:10.2307/41461622?ref=no-x-route:c7066580c7d199a3753f7f108182ab15
Rodriguez, C.I., Simpson, H.B., Liu, S.-M., Levinson, A., Blanco, C., 2013b. Prevalence and Correlates of Difficulty Discarding. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 201, 795–801. doi:10.1097/NMD.0b013e3182a21471
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
30
Rubia, K., Alegria, A.A., Cubillo, A.I., Smith, A.B., Brammer, M.J., Radua, J., 2014. Effects of Stimulants on Brain Function in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder_ A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BPS 76, 616–628. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.10.016 Samuels, J.F., Bienvenu, O.J., Grados, M.A., Cullen, B., Riddle, M.A., Liang, K.-Y., Eaton, W.W., Nestadt, G., 2008. Prevalence and correlates of hoarding behavior in a community-based sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy 46, 836–844.
CR IP T
doi:10.1016/j.brat.2008.04.004
Samuels, J.F., Bienvenu, O.J., III, Pinto, A., Fyer, A.J., McCracken, J.T., Rauch, S.L.,
Murphy, D.L., Grados, M.A., Greenberg, B.D., Knowles, J.A., Piacentini, J., Cannistraro, P.A., Cullen, B., Riddle, M.A., Rasmussen, S.A., Pauls, D.L., Willour, V.L., Shugart, Y.Y., Liang, K.-Y., Hoehn-Saric, R., Nestadt, G., 2007. Hoarding in obsessive–
AN US
compulsive disorder: Results from the OCD Collaborative Genetics Study. Behaviour Research and Therapy 45, 673–686. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2006.05.008 Sarter, M., Givens, B., Bruno, J.P., 2001. The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: where top-down meets bottom-up. Brain research reviews.
doi:10.1002/jclp.20792
M
Saxena, S., 2011. Pharmacotherapy of compulsive hoarding. J. Clin. Psychol. 67, 477–484.
ED
Saxena, S., Sumner, J., 2014. Venlafaxine extended-release treatment of hoarding disorder. International Clinical Psychopharmacology 29, 266–273. Sheehan, D.V., Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, K.H., Amorim, P., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., Hergueta,
PT
T., Baker, R., Dunbar, G.C., 1998. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric
CE
interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 59, 22–33. Steketee, G., Frost, R.O., Kyrios, M., 2003. Cognitive Aspects of Compulsive Hoarding.
AC
Cognitive Therapy and Research 27, 463–479. Timpano, K.R., Exner, C., Glaesmer, H., Rief, W., Keshaviah, A., Brähler, E., Wilhelm, S., 2011. The Epidemiology of the Proposed DSM-5 Hoarding Disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 72, 780–786. doi:10.4088/JCP.10m06380
Tolin, D.F., Frost, R.O., Steketee, G., 2010. A brief interview for assessing compulsive hoarding: The Hoarding Rating Scale-Interview. Psychiatry Research 178, 147–152. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2009.05.001
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
31
Tolin, D.F., Frost, R.O., Steketee, G., Gray, K.D., Fitch, K.E., 2008. The economic and social burden of compulsive hoarding. Psychiatry Research 160, 200–211. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2007.08.008 Tolin, D.F., Frost, R.O., Steketee, G., Muroff, J., 2015. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Hoarding Disorder: A Meta-analysis. Depress Anxiety 32, 158–166. doi:10.1002/da.22327 Tolin, D.F., Stevens, M.C., Nave, A., Villavicencio, A.L., Morrison, S., 2012a. Neural
CR IP T
mechanisms of cognitive behavioral therapy response in Hoarding Disorder: A pilot study. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders 1, 180–188. doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2012.04.001
Tolin, D.F., Stevens, M.C., Villavicencio, A.L., Norberg, M.M., Calhoun, V.D., Frost, R.O., Steketee, G., Rauch, S.L., Pearlson, G.D., 2012b. Neural Mechanisms of Decision
AN US
Making in Hoarding Disorder. Archives of General Psychiarty 69, 832–841.
Tolin, D.F., Villavicencio, A., 2011. Inattention, but not OCD, predicts the core features of Hoarding Disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy 49, 120–125. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2010.12.002
M
Tolin, D.F., Villavicencio, A., Umbach, A., Kurtz, M.M., 2011. Neuropsychological functioning in hoarding disorder. Psychiatry Research 189, 413–418.
ED
doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2011.06.022
Weinberg, A., Liu, H., Shankman, S.A., 2015. Blunted neural response to errors as a trait marker of melancholic depression 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.11.012
PT
Williams, M., Viscusi, J.A., 2016. Hoarding Disorder and a Systematic Review of Treatment with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 1–18.
CE
doi:10.1080/16506073.2015.1133697 Wincze, J.P., Steketee, G., Frost, R.O., 2007. Categorization in compulsive hoarding.
AC
Behaviour Research and Therapy 45, 63–72. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2006.01.012