Psychosocial Aspects of Crohn's Disease

Psychosocial Aspects of Crohn's Disease

00394109/01 $15.00 CROHNS DISEASE + .OO PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF CROHN’S DISEASE Yehuda Ringel, MD, and Douglas A. Drossman, MD Although the unders...

1MB Sizes 19 Downloads 69 Views

00394109/01 $15.00

CROHNS DISEASE

+ .OO

PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF CROHN’S DISEASE Yehuda Ringel, MD, and Douglas A. Drossman, MD

Although the understanding of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has advanced significantly over the past decade, knowledge of the etiology, natural history, and clinical expression of Crohn‘s disease is still in evolution. Crohn‘s disease varies not only in the extent and severity of intestinal and extraintestinal involvement but also in its clinical presentation. In these circumstances, the management of these patients usually is determined by the presenting type (e.g., inflammatory, fistulizing, or fibrotic), location, activity, and severity of the disease. Several indices have been designed and used to measure the disease activity and severity. These indices usually are based on scoring clinical signs and symptoms (e.g., Crohn‘s Disease Activity Index [CDAI]),Harvey-Bradshaw Index,lo,59 objective endoscopic or laboratory data,lZ1or a combination of physical findings and laboratory data (e.g., Cape Town Index).lZ8 Nevertheless, the activity and severity of the disease usually are insufficient to explain the variability in the clinical presentation of the disease.5oSome physicians care for patients in whom significant discrepancies exist between the “disease” activity and severity, as defined by the disease related factors, and the patients’ symptom experience and behavior (i.e., the ”illness”). For example, with an 8-cm segment of ileitis, one patient may be disabled because of severe symptoms, whereas another may report no complaints and functions normally. Discrepancies between the ”disease” and the ”illness” cannot be

From the Functional Gastrointestinal and Motility Disorders Center, Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (YR, DAD); and Tel Aviv University, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel (YR)

SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA

-

VOLUME 81 NUMBER 1 * FEBRUARY 2001

231

232

RINGEL & DROSSMAN

explained by the biological or morphologic findings; usually they are considered as related to psychosocial factors.43,50 The important influence of psychological and social factors on the clinical expression, response to treatment, and outcome has been shown in various chronic diseases, but studies addressing this issue are limited in IBD. A survey of a random sample of 1000 members of the American Gastroenterological Associati~n~~ showed that physicians believed that psychosocial factors do not contribute to the cause of IBD but that psychosocial factors affect the clinical exacerbation of symptoms. Conversely, more than half of the patients with IBD believe that stress or personality is a major contributor to the development of their disease, and more than 90% think that stress influences their disease a ~ t i v i t y . ~ ~ , ~ ~ Although physicians and patients have considered psychosocial factors as important in the clinical expression of IBD, confusion and controversy still exist as to their precise role, often because opinions are formed from anecdotal observations or from limited scientific data. Also, the general tendency is to view IBD from a purely biomedical perspective and to regard the contributing role of psychosocial factors with speculation or bias. This article reviews the relationship of psychosocial factors with the pathogenesis and clinical expression of Crohn‘s disease. Because much of the literature in this field does not separate between chronic ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, this article relates mainly to Crohn’s disease but, in some parts, to IBD in general. The advances in the scientific understanding of the relationships between the neural, endocrine, and immune systems are reviewed to close the gap between clinical observations and basic investigation. Some of the common psychosocial concomitants and consequences of IBD are discussed. A comprehensive model of illness and disease is suggested, and ways to integrate psychosocial factors and issues in the diagnosis and patient care are presented.

STRESS AND INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE Human Studies

Social disorganization and major changes in a person’s lifestyle correlate with medical disorders and subsequent illness or injury.13Although several studies link social stress in humans to chronic diseases, only a few have evaluated IBD, and many are anecdotal, retrospective, or uncontrolled studies. Even the few well-designed studies of IBD give mixed results: in a 6-month prospective study, Duffy et a P studied the relationship of monthly major life events with symptoms and disease activity among 124 patients with IBD and found a strong relationship between major life events, particularly health-related events and symptom exacerbation. Also, an association existed for life events that pre-

PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF CROHNS DISEASE

233

ceded symptom exacerbation by 1 month. When controlling for other sociodemographic and clinical data, antecedent major life events were the factors most explanatory of disease activity (although they accounted for only 7% of the variance of disease activity). Another study evaluated, over a 28-day period, routine daily stressors with bowel symptoms among 10 patients with Crohn's disease.51Using a time-series regression, the investigators found a significant association between acute daily stress and bowel symptoms (e.g., pain, nausea, and diarrhea) even after controlling for major life-event scores. In contrast, North et alg8studied the effects of major life events and mood on bowel symptoms and pain in 32 patients with IBD and found no association between these life events and mood with symptoms 1 or 2 months later but found an association between depression and symptom severity. If stress affects symptom severity or disease activity in patients with IBD, psychotherapeutic intervention may be helpful. A few prospective, controlled studiesg1,lo8 have shown a favorable effect of psychotherapy on certain psychological outcomes (e.g., stress, depression, and anxiety levels) and the course of the disease (e.g., improvement in CDAI and the need for inpatient treatment).91In contrast, a multicenter, randomized, controlled study showed that psychotherapeutic intervention did not have additional benefit over standardized corticosteroid treatment alone.@ The lack of agreement between the studies is not surprising because significant methodologic limitations exist in most 98, 99, log including small sample size, referral bias, retrospective design, lack of control groups, and inappropriate selection of psychological instruments or analysis of data. Also, the complex relationship between psychosocial factors and human illness makes even a well-designed study insufficient or difficult to support a definite conclusion. For example, most studies that concluded a negative relationship between stressors and illness or exacerbation of IBD have not included modulating factors, such as social support and coping style, in the and coping style may have affected clinical outcome.35So, statistically insignificant results may mean only that the study failed to consider all relevant psychosocial measures in the analysis. With this consideration, some conclusions may be drawn: (1)epidemiologic and clinical data have historically indicated an association between various psychosocial stressors and illness exacerbation; (2) data relating life events to IBD exacerbation are inconsistent and conflicting; (3) data linking life events and daily stressors with physiologic effects (e.g., pain and diarrhea) are supported; (4)the major stressors identified in life events research are not unique and include illness or death in the family, divorce or separation, interpersonal conflict, or other major loss; and, (5) the data on effects of psychotherapeutic intervention with the illness or disease activity are insufficient and require additional research with careful design and choice of assessment instruments.

234

RINGEL & DROSSMAN

Animal Studies

The data from animal studies provide linkages between environmental stress and the development of gastrointestinal inflammation and inflammatory disease. Physical restraint, prolonged swimming, premature weaning, and conditioned anxiety all have been shown to produce acute or chronic gut inflammation in several animal models.x,48,115 The cotton-topped tamarin, a New World monkey from Columbia, develops ulcerative colitis and colon cancer only in capti~ity.'~,'~~ Investigators propose that capturing these animals and changing their unique natural social unit, usually at lower temperatures than the jungle habitat, produce sufficient environmental disruption (i.e., social isolation and cold stress) to influence the development of these diseases.36,55, lZ7 No other environmental factors, such as infection, diet, or radiation, have been found to explain why these diseases occur in captivity. Thus, this species may be the closest colitis model to humans that associates disruption of psychosocial and environmental structures with the pathogenesis of the inflammation. SUGGESTIONS FOR PATHOPHYSIOLOGIC MECHANISMS Stress Effects on Gut Function

Psychological and emotional stressors may affect the GI motor, sensory, and secretory function directly or indirectly through the richly innervated nerve plexuses existing between the enteric nervous system, the spinal and autonomic connections, and the CNS (i.e., the "brain-gut 85 Stress effects on intestinal motility have been reported in axis").84* laboratory animals and in humans. Immobilization stress and conditioned fear cause significant changes in intestinal myoelectric activity in laboratory dogs96and rats?" Studies in human subjects using advanced or manometry techniques showed different patterns of intestinal motility (in different segments of the GI tract) in response to physical or psychological stress. Also, psychological stress has been shown to induce more prolonged effect compared with physical stress.3,*02, I3O Psychological factors also have been suggested to be responsible for the reduced pain thresholds in patients with functional GI disorders and to modulate the patients' perception of symptoms and illness behavi0r.3~ Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis and Neuroendocrinelmmune Regulation

The idea that the nervous system has contributed to the pathogenesis of intestinal inflammation is not new. Several researches in the early 1950s suggested surgical denervation of the inflamed colon as a treat-

PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF CROHNS DISEASE

235

ment option for refractory colitis and Crohn's disease.25,lo9,lZo Today, considerable data show that environmental stress may influence disease susceptibility by the connections between the CNS and humoral and cellular immune or inflammatory pathways. Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis

Immune or inflammatory mediators (i.e., cytokines), such as interleukins, tumor necrosis factor-a, prostaglandin, and platelet-activating factor potently stimulate the hypothalamus to secrete corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH),llz,113 which, in turn, stimulates the pituitary gland to release adrenocorticotropichormone, which stimulates the adrenal glands to release glucocorticoids. The corticosteroids suppress inflammation and the production of cytokines, thereby completing the negative-feedback circuit. Many chronic conditions are linked to the disruption or dysregulation of this stress-response system.15,112 Neuroendocrine-Immune Pathways

The autonomic nervous system and the CNS have important roles 112 Peripheral in the body's homeostatic stress-adaptation nerves and the autonomic nervous system innervate immune-system and the immune-system cells (e.g., lymphocytes and macrophages) contain receptors for, and respond to, neurotransmitters and ne~ropeptides."~ Various effects of neuropeptides on immune function or regulation have been described, including decreased responsiveness to mitogens and antigens, reduced lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity, reduced delayed hypersensitivity, diminished skin-graft rejection and graft-versus-host reactivity, and suppressed antibody response.34,71 Thus, stressors, by their neural and endocrine connections, may influence the immune or inflammatory response in various systems, including the GI system.85,112, 113 Also, the CNS contains neuronal pathways and receptors for cytokines and other substances that are produced by the immunesystem cells, which enables the immune or inflammatory mediators (e.g., cytokines produced in response to gut inflammation) to modulate higher neural functions and behavior.l8f113 Experimental data provide some evidence regarding these mechanisms. Stress-Induced, Centrally Mediated Inflammation

Gue et aP7 showed that stress or administration of intracerebroventricular corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) were associated with increased abdominal contractions in rats on electromyography. Both effects may be blocked by administrating CRF antagonist, suggesting central CRF involvement in stress-induced abdominal contractions in response to rectal distention. Other circumstantial evidence for the role of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis come from the following ex-

236

RINGEL & DROSSMAN

amples.' The eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome is an inflammatory disease that results from ingestion of impure L-tryptophan and associated with diarrhea and chronic inflammatory (i.e., eosinophilic and mononuclear) mucosal infiltrati~n.~~ Notably, this inflammatory response also is associated with suppression of hypothalamic CRH mRNA expression2' and suppresses CRH release. Thus, the decreased CRH reactivity in this situation is associated with the development of gut immune-mediated inflammation.2Subserosal injection of streptococcal peptidoglycan polysaccharide (PG-APS) in rats morphologically induces enterocolitis similar to human Crohn's disease.lo4Interestingly, the disease develops in Lewis and Sprague-Dawley rats (having genetically deficient HPA-axis reactivity) but not in Fischer or Buffalo rats (having increased HPA-axis reactivity). Similarly, although both strains (i.e., Lewis and Fischer rats) show significant colitis in response to trinitrobenzene, the instillation of superimposed stress was associated with worsening of the colitis only in the Lewis rats. Also, intracerebroventricular administration of CRF resulted in nearly complete healing in the Fischer rats but incomplete healing in the Lewis rats.97 The findings of some other studies still raise some questions regarding the role of centrally mediated mechanisms. Some studies did not find or confirm the relationships between CRH or arginine vasopressin alteration^^^ or HPA-axis dysfunctionlo' and stress reactivation of previously induced trinitrobenzene or dinitrobenzene (DNB) colitis. CRH also was found to be produced peripherally at the site of inflammation, suggesting an autocrine or paracrine Also, the PG-APS-induced colitis in rats is associated with increased tissue interleukin (1L)1 or IL-1 receptor antagonist ratio and increased activation of the Kallikrein-Kinin system,'04 both of which have been associated with the pathogenesis of the disease.s6,Io5 Thus, based on the data, one may conclude that central (i.e., HPA-axis) and peripheral (i.e., immune or inflammatory mucosal) mechanisms have a role in the pathogenesis of the disease.

Stress-Induced, Immune-Mediated Inflammation Collins et all9 and Qiu et allo1showed that restraint stress may rekindle an inflammatory response in Wistar-Kyoto and Sprague-Dawley rats that recovered from experimental trinitrobenzene sulfonic acidinduced colitis. The investigators showed an increase tissue inflammatory response by both, increased myeloperoxidase activity,19 and evidence of morphologic (i.e., macroscopic and microscopic) colitis.lO' By using this model, the same group of investigators showed that stressinduced reactive inflammation did not occur in athymic mice, mice with severe combined immunodeficiency, or in CD,+-depleted Balblc knockout mice, but they were able to induce stress-reactive inflammation with the transfer of CD,+-enriched cells from mice with acute colitis to mice with severe combined immunodeficiency. These results provide objective evidence of the causal effect of stress on the exacerbation of

PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF CROHNS DISEASE

237

intestinal inflammation and a preliminary suggestion for the mechanism of this effect by showing that stress-induced reactive inflammation is immune-mediated and requires CD,' lymphocytes. Stress-Induced Increase in Gut Mucosal Permeability

Some studies have shown that, *in Wistar-Kyoto rats, when physically restrained, intestinal mucin is decreased and intestinal mucosal permeability is increased,lol,lo6 which is consistent with the theory that defects in the mucosal barrier function are an important component of disease pathogenesis.80Disruption of the mucosal barrier allows antigens to cross the intestinal mucosa and activate the inflammatory response. Reciprocal Effects of Gut Inflammation on CNS and Illness Behavior

The gut mucosal cells can express cytokine genes and synthesize and release cytokines. Studies have shown that inflammation may increase the expression of mRNA and the production of several inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-la, IL-lb, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-a).20,70 Thus, the intestinal mucosal cells actively participate in the inflammatory response by elaborating proinflammatory cytokines. Also, the inflammatory process may cause structural and functional abnormalities in the enteric nervous system. Interestingly, these changes are not restricted to the inflamed site but may involve nerves and bowel segments that are remote from the inflammation site.9,53, 63 These sustained or prolonged structural and functional alterations in the gut neuromuscular pathways may provide a possible mechanism for the association of IBD and inflammatory bowel syndrome (IBS). Also, the inflammatory process in the gut, through the effect of inflammatory cytokines, also may affect the autonomic nervous system9and CNS function,18,113 thus providing a possible explanation or mechanism for the altered or illness behavior. The evidence for the reciprocal affect of gut inflammation on behavior are limited. Some studies suggest that peripherally activated inflammatory cytokines mediate the significant reduction in food intake and the exaggerated postprandial satiety in hapten-induced colitis and systemic inflammation.87,88, 113, 124

PSYCHOSOCIAL CONCOMITANTS ANDCONSEQUENCESOF INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

In addition to the influencing role of psychosocial factors on the pathogenesis or exacerbation of Crohn's disease, once the disease devel-

238

RINGEL & DROSSMAN

ops, psychosocial concomitants must be understood and considered to understand the clinical expression of the illness and to provide proper care. As with any chronic and painful illness, Crohn’s disease may have emotional and psychological consequences. The spectrum of the psychological disorders that may be associated with Crohn‘s disease is beyond the scope of this article. The data regarding these disorders in Crohn‘s disease are limited and may be found e l ~ e w h e r eTherefore, .~~ this section will focus on a broader view of the psychosocial effects of Crohn’s disease and some modulators that may affect them. Psychological Impact of the Disease Psychological Diagnosis and Mood States Transient psychological distress or mood states, such as depression or anxiety, are common in patients with Crohn‘s disease and relate to living with the disease. Also, some drugs used in treating IBD patients, such as corticosteroids or narcotics, may exacerbate depression. These psychological states may lower pain thresholds, amplify illness behavior, increase healthcare and diminish the response to treatment.66 When other psychiatric diagnoses occur, they also need to be recognized and treated. The most common psychiatric diagnosis in patients with Crohn‘s disease is major depressive disorder,’jObut other psychiatric disorders, such as anxiety disorder and somatization (i.e., somatoform), also may occur as in other chronic medical illnesses.34 Numerous studies have shown a frequency of concurrent psychiatric morbidity in patients with Crohn’s disease that is higher than in healthy controls, patients with ulcerative colitis, and patients with other chronic medical illnesses.4,60, 73, 116 The prevalence is as high as 35% for current and 65% for lifetime psychiatric disorders,lZ2but because psychiatric disorders may influence the severity of the disease, healthcare seeking, and physician visits,’j6the high rates probably reflect the selection of patients with more severe psychological distress, who exhibit greater healthcare use and more of whom are in tertiary care.38The greater degree of psychological disturbance in Crohn‘s disease than ulcerative colitis or controls relates to the greater severity of disease.38,39, 89, lzz For example, in a United States random study of persons belonging to the Crohn‘s and Colitis Foundation of patients with Crohn’s disease had greater psychological dysfunction and psychological distress than did patients with ulcerative colitis, but, controlling for disease severity, these differences were not statistically signifi~ant.~~ Also, comparisons between IBD members with active (CDAI, > 182) and inactive disease confirmed that all psychosocial measures were significantly higher in patients with more active disease.38 Personality Disturbance Researchers have tried to understand some diseases as linked to specific personality features (so-called specificityhypothesis),’ unconscious

PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF CROHNS DISEASE

239

conflicts,l or disturbed interpersonal re1ation~hips.l~~ Although attempts to validate the specificity of these personality factors for medical diseases have been made? ll1 the methodology and results were not convincing.5, 33, 43 More researchers have reported a higher prevalence of neuroticism and introversion in patients with Crohn's disease than in patients with ulcerative colitis or other medical disorders? 52, 60, lo3but the importance of these findings is unclear. A different personality construct of alexithymia is of possible clinical relevance. Alexithymia (from the Greek, absence of words for emotions) has been described in the past 25 years in various medical conditions, 117 Patients with alexiincluding ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disea~e.4~~ thymia have chronic difficulties recognizing and verbalizing emotions. Investigators believe that alexithymia develops in response to early traumatic experiences, such as abuse, severe childhood illness, or depravation. Patients with alexithymia may express strong emotions, such as anger or sadness, in relation to their illness, but they know little about the psychological basis for these feelings and cannot link them with past experience or current illness.l18This limits their ability to regulate emotions, use coping strategies effectively, and adjust to their chronic condition. Their tendency to communicate emotional distress through somatic symptoms and illness behavior rather than verbally may be associated with more frequent physician visits and a poorer prognosis.82 Finally, some investigator^^^, 122 suggest that patients with refractory Crohn's disease should undergo psychiatric evaluation for "psychogenicity." This approach is not widely accepted, but the authors believe that, in some cases in which the illness presentation is greater than evident from disease activity, a significant psychological or emotional diagnosis may coexist with the disease. In this case, identifying and addressing these factors may help to improve responsiveness to treatment, outcome, and well-being. Modulators of Psychological Disturbances and Stressors

The effect of Crohn's disease and the effects of concomitants psychological distresses on patients may be modulated by environmental, behavioral, and social factors. Early Experience and Life Events

Early life experience, such as living with a family member who suffers from GI symptoms or familial dysfunction (e.g., conflicts or divorce) and recent major or stressful life events (e.g., the breakup of a close relationship or loss of a loved one) may cause additional psychological and emotional stress that may magnify the illness and lead to adverse health outcomes. Special attention or consideration should be given to a history of physical or sexual abuse. Abuse history is common

240

RINGEL & DROSSMAN

among patients with chronic medical and gastrointestinal illnesses.4o,41,74 It is associated with functional disability and increased psychological distress, abdominal and extra-abdominal pain, healthcare seeking, physician visits, and surgery.4o,41 Disease-Related Concerns

Having IBD requires working through the personal meaning of the illness and its possible consequences, including fears about pain or incontinence; impaired physical or social functioning; financial hardship; adjusting to perineal disease or an ostomy; or, the prospect of future surgery, cancer, or death. Patients’ concerns regarding their illness and disease affect their health status, adjustment to the illness, and treatment plan. To obtain and quantify IBD-specific worriers and concerns, the authors developed the Rating Form of IBD Concerns (RFIPC), which includes the 25 most common concerns of patients with IBD.4zIn a study of randomly selected patients belonging to the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of America, the authors found that the unclear nature of the disease, medication side effects, energy level, surgery (and having an ostomy bag), being a burden to others, loss of bowel control, and the possible development of cancer are the most important concerns in these patients. Differences in concerns between patients with Crohn‘s disease and patients with ulcerative colitis are also noted. Other studies using the RFIPC instrument showed a higher rate of IBD-related concerns in blacks than in whites (E. C. De Rooy et al, unpublished observations, 1996), different concerns-severity scores vary across countries, with some country-related differences on individual items.77Also, IBD-related concerns correlate negatively with the patients’ knowledge about the disease42,95 (i.e., lower information level is associated with higher level of concerns). Because patients’ ability to adjust to their disease is higher when they are informed about the nature and effects of their illness (G. Moser and D. A. Drossman, unpublished observations, 1999), one may speculate that adequate information through counseling and education may reduce patients’ concerns, increase their adjustment to the illness, and improve their health status and outcome. RFIPC correlates with patient self-perceptions of well-being, and other quality-of-life measuresz7,42 and was found to be responsive to surgical t~eatment,2~? lz9 but RFIPC does not necessarily correlate with physical symptoms, which suggests that IBD-related concerns are a separate domain of health status of these patients. Therefore, it may be used as a disease-specific instrument for the evaluation of these patients’ health status and outcomes. Coping and Social Support

Coping involves the efforts to appraise or manage the illness.” Effective coping strategies may mitigate some of the major domains of

PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF C R O W S DISEASE

241

the illness, such as depression, anxiety, and somatic symptoms.” A maladaptive coping strategy occurs when patients view their health state with pessimism (e.g., “It’s never going to be better.”) and with little perceived control (e.g., ”catastrophizing” and “perceived controllability”).68Studies that have looked at coping patterns in patients with IBD35,72 have shown that these patients are more likely to use problemfocused, relative to emotion-focused, strategies. Different coping styles may have adaptive or maladaptive effects on a patient’s health status and outcome. Effective or adaptive coping strategies may help to reduce psychological distress and improve health status and daily n,76 In contrast, maladaptive ”catastrophizing” style and low perceived controllability correlate strongly with depression, have negative effects on health status,54,68, 69 and predict poor health outcome among patients with GI symptoms.22Behavioral treatment methods may improve coping style in patients with IBD.lo7 The availability of social-support networks may buffer the adverse effects of these stresses on one’s health status. The effects of socialsupport networks have not been studied in patients with IBD, but investigators report that patients with strong social support networks have a greater sense of control over illness and have lower stress levels than patients who do Conversely, people with poor social-support networks are at greater risk for mortality.8 Impact on Outcome Health-Related Quality of Life

The inability of objective markers of disease activity or severity (e.g., CDAI) to measure the effects of important environmental and psychosocial variables on a patient’s health status or well-being sets the need for the development of a more sensitive clinical assessment instrument. The integrated effects of physiologic state, psychological state, physical function, and social interactions on an individual’s overall general sense of personal well-being is encompassed in the term quality of life (QOL).lloHealth-related QOL (HRQOL), also called health status, is a global measure that incorporates the patient’s perceptions, attributions, and daily level of function in response to an It incorporates the contributions of the biological nature of the disease and the psychological, social, and cultural factors. HRQOL has become an important patient-oriented clinical-outcome measure for many chronic diseases, in45* 119 cluding chronic GI diseases.28* Several instruments have been developed to measure HRQOL, including generic measures (e.g., Sickness Impact Profile7 and Medical Outcome Study SF-36123)and disease (condition)-specificmeasures. Several disease-specific QOL instruments have been developed for IBD. A commonly used instrument is the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Ques-

242

RINGEL & DROSSMAN

tionnaire, which was shown to be reliable, valid, and responsive to changes relating to medical treatment.62More information about the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire and other disease-specific QOL instruments for IBD may be found elsewhere.28Also, the RFIPC represents an independent domain on health status and also can be used as a disease-specific QOL measure.42 Results from clinical studies of HRQOL in IBD or Crohn’s disease show that, despite the potential adverse consequences of having IBD, most patients maintain good physical and social functioning,38,39, 46, 62, 81 at least comparable to other ambulatory patients with other diseases. Assessing patients’ health status by using HRQOL has further emphasized the major or significant impact of psychosocial factors on the patients’ well-being. The impairment in HRQOL was found to be greater in the psychological and social dimension than in the physical dimenhealthcare utilization and scores of well-being correlate ~ i o n 39, . ~95~Also, , better with the daily functional status related to IBD than with the physician’s rating of the disease activity.39 Illness Behavior The patient’s behavior in the face of chronic illness (e.g., Crohn’s disease) is not determined only by the disease type, severity, or activity. Psychological factors, psychosocial modifiers (e.g., coping, social support, and previous experiences), and the person’s social (i.e., family and society) and cultural environments also influence when and how the disease is experienced and the individual’s attitudes and behaviors relating to it.90 NEED FOR AN INTEGRATED MODEL OF ILLNESS AND DISEASE

Disease activity and severity are insufficient to explain the variability in the patient’s symptoms or behavior (i.e., the illness).50Other domains of the patient’s health, such as psychological factors and environmental modulators, have to be included and considered to allow for a more comprehensive assessment of the patient’s health status (or illness). The biopsychosocial modelz9,30, 47 permits a broader and more practical framework to deal with the complexity of the patient’s illness. It presumes that physiologic, psychological, behavioral, and environmental factors interact simultaneously at multiple levels to define the illness. Also, the illness may reciprocate and affect its determinants, leading to varying effects on the individual. Consistent with the biopsychosocial model (Fig. l),genetic and environmental factors early in life determine the susceptibility to IBD. Then, psychosocial factors and modifiers interacting with the physiologic or pathologic state influence when and how the disease is experienced symptomatically; the individual’s illness

PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF C R O W S DISEASE

Stress

243

Emotions

Psychosoeial Factors (Psychiatricdiag., Personality, Coping Culture, Social support etc.)

U

I

Psychosocial Status

Early life Genetic

_ _ _ _ ~

Envimnnenr

Behavior Neuroendocrindimmune

I Outcome Dailyfuncrion Health care use Work absenteeism

Intestinal Functiou/Disease (secretory, motor,sensory,

PhysiologicaVPathologicalStatus Figure 1. Biopsychosocial understanding of inflammatoty bowel disease (IBD). Early in life, genetic and environmental factors determine the susceptibility to IBD. Later, psychosocial factors and modifiers interacting with the physiologic/pathologicstates will influence when and how the disease is experienced symptomatically, the individual’s illness behavior, and the clinical outcome.

behavior; and, ultimately, the clinical outcome. Negative factors, such as life stress or concurrent psychiatric diagnosis, lead to more severe illness or, potentially, disease activation. Conversely, health-promoting factors, such as strong social-support networks or effective coping style, ameliorate the effects of disease and improve outcome (i.e., symptoms, wellbeing, daily function, utilization of healthcare, and the patient’s HRQOL). For example, one stressor, such as a death or other traumatic experience, could affect the patient’s psychological state, physiologic state (e.g., the inflammatory process), the severity of symptoms, and the patient’s behavior. Also, the patient’s physiologic status (as determined by the type, activity and severity of the ”disease”) may affect not only the patient’s symptoms and behavior but also (in a reciprocal manner) the patient’s psychological state. The later effects depend also on preexisting psychiatric status, social-support networks, or coping style. Thus, by integrating the disease with the other domains of illness, the biopsychosocial model enables a more comprehensive assessment and understanding not only of the ”disease” but also its perception, experience, expression, and their effects in an individual patient. This may explain the variation in the illness condition and clinical outcome. Some patients may have poor health status with little evidence for active disease,

244

RINGEL & DROSSMAN

whereas other patients with severe disease function well because of little psychological morbidity, good social support, and effective coping methods.

INTEGRATING PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS IN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT Assessment and Evaluation of Psychosocial Factors

The assessment of a patient’s psychosocial well-being is an essential part of diagnosis and patient care. The data collection requires the willingness to address the biologic and psychosocial aspects of the illness.31Physicians should create a trusting clinical environment so that the patients will feel comfortable disclosing their thoughts and feelings. Nevertheless, some patients (e.g., patients with alexithymia) have difficulty in expressing their feelings or relating them to their illness. These patients should be encouraged to tell the story in their own way, so that the events contributing to the illness unfold naturally.79,93 The traditional medical and social histories should be elicited together so that the symptoms are understood in the context of the psychosocial events surrounding the illness. This is important in cases in which the patient’s symptoms are not fully explained by the disease or do not respond to anti-inflammatory therapy. Some of the important variables to be inquired and assessed in history taking include: Perceived (subjective) severity of the illness Current life stress (e.g., job demands, health care expenses, and insurance coverage) Psychiatric comorbidity Personality characteristics Disease-related worries and concerns Patient’s adaptation to the illness and coping Quality of social support Quality of life Patient’s treatment expectations The patient’s report must be appraised together with the results of objective studies, and physicians should determine the relative contribution of the medical and psychosocial dimensions to the patient’s illness. This process is helpful to establish priorities for further evaluation or treatment and to avoid unnecessary studies, treatments, or even surgical intervention.26Also, physicians should corroborate patients’ reports with those of their families. Some patients may hold back disclosing the degree of functional impairment (i.e., ”to be strong”), whereas others, at risk of losing family attention, work relief, or compensation, may subconsciously amplify the degree of disability, at least at first.

PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF CROHNS DISEASE

245

Integrating Psychosocial Aspects into Patient Care

Consistent with the biopsychosocial model, physicians should achieve control of the inflammatory process (i.e., the disease) as part of a more comprehensive management plan. By addressing the psychosocial factors that also contribute to the illness, a more patient-focused model of care is established that addresses not only the disease but also the disease modifiers and psychological consequences (i.e., the illness). Following are some general recommendations for establishing a more comprehensive therapeutic approach. Detailed guidelines are described elsewhere.31.32.43 Establish an effective physician-patient relationship by actively listening to patients’ thoughts and concerns, empathetically and nonjudgmentally responding to them, and providing information consistent with patients’ interests and needs. Help patients learn and accept the disease by providing education and reas~urance.~~ Help patients appraise and adapt to stressors. Knowing and recognizing the association between bowel symptoms and psychosocial stress may help patients to modify all factors affecting the illness condition. Help patients take responsibility for the healthcare. Patients should be apprised of the risks and benefits of treatment alternatives and actively participate in healthcare decisions. This process helps patient to achieve a greater sense of control over the illness, which ultimately improves health outcome. Involve the family. The support and encouragement provided by the patients’ families is an important asset with any care plan. Sometimes family members may feel helpless, guilty, or angry, but expressing such feelings may be unacceptable. Physicians may help to ameliorate these feelings by acknowledging them, enlisting family participation in the treatment, and recommending family counseling when necessary. Reinforce health-promoting behaviors by encouraging patients to take responsibility, to learn to cope with a chronic illness (rather than to expect cure), and limit discussion of symptoms to no more than is needed to satisfy medical concerns. Specific Therapeutic Issues

Medications with central or psychotropic effects (e.g., antidepressants) may be used to treat comorbid affective or psychiatric disorders (e.g., depression or anxiety). Treating depressive disorders is the same as treating patients without Crohn’s disease, and usually it involves antidepressant medication or psychotherapy. Some specific issues should be considered when choosing antidepressant therapy for patients with

246

RINGEL & DROSSMAN

Crohn’s disease, including side effects (e.g., constipation with tricyclic antidepressants) and pharmacologic properties (e.g., poor oral absorption). Independent of their effects on mood, antidepressants also act as “central analgesics” to raise perception threshold and may therefore be considered when pain associated with disability is a common feature.16,32 Low doses of tricyclic antidepressants, such as desipramine or amitriptyline have been best studied and seem to be effective. Low-dose serotonin reuptake inhibitors may be preferred in patients with constipation because of their low or absent anticholinergic effects. Treatment should be maintained for 6 to 12 months before tapering. Patients should be informed that as much as several weeks may be required for these medications to work; they are not addictive; and side effects, if they occur, ameliorate over 1 or 2 weeks. Some new medications directed to reduce gut sensitivity (i.e., 5-HT3 antagonists) have been approved for treating patients with IBS,‘* but no data are available regarding their use in patients with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis. Other drugs are currently undergoing clinical trials, including 5-HT3= and 5-HT4 antagonists and K-opioid antagonists.= Psychiatric consultation should be considered when (1) a patient has a psychiatric illness, major life stress, loss, or abuse requiring treatment; (2) a patient’s daily functioning (e.g., ability to work) or family relationships are severely impaired; and (3) diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are being considered based on patient complaints without supportive medical data.

SUMMARY

Patients and clinicians have always recognized the importance of psychosocial factors as consequences of IBD and as predeterminants for symptom exacerbati~n.~~ Over the past decade, improvements in psychosocial assessment and clinical research design methodology, coupled with new data in brain-gut physiology and psychoneuroimmunology, have led investigators and clinicians to accept a broader approach to illness and disease (i.e., the biopsychosocial model). Based on this understanding and the evidence presented in this article, several conclusions can be made: 1. The pathophysiology of IBD is best understood in terms of dysregulation of homeostatic systems (i.e., neural, endocrine, immune, and inflammatory) in a biologically predisposed host rather than as conditions caused by specific etiologic factor(s). 2. Psychosocial factors contribute to the onset, severity, clinical expression, and outcome of IBD. Determination of the precise role for these factors requires further study.

PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF CROHNS DISEASE

247

3. Identifiable psychosocial factors (e.g., psychiatric diagnosis, personality, life stress, coping, and social support) correlate with the overall severity of the condition; they are not specific for IBD. 4. Physicians must identify psychosocial factors unique to each individual that contribute to the clinical expression of the disorder. 5. Optimal care requires the establishment of a comprehensive, effective therapeutic approach.

References 1. Alexander F: Psychosomatic Medicine: Its Principles and Applications. New York, WW Norton, 1950 2. Alexander F, French TM, Pollack G: Psychosomatic specificity: Experimental study and results. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1968 3. Anderson KO, Dalton CB, Bradley LA, et al: Stress induces alteration of esophageal pressures in healthy volunteers and non-cardiac chest pain patients. Dig Dis Sci 34:83, 1989 4. Andrews H, Barczak P, Allan RN: Psychiatric illness in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 28:1600, 1987 5. Aronowitz R, Spiro HM: The rise and fall of the psychosomatic hypothesis on ulcerative colitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 10298, 1988 6. Bellinger DL, Lorton D, Romano TD, et al: Neuropeptide innervation of lymphoid organs. Ann N Y Acad Sci 594:17, 1990 7. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB: The sickness impact profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 19:787, 1981 8. Berkman LF, Syme SL: Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: A nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. Am J Epidemiol 109:186, 1979 9. Bemstein CN, Niazi N, Robert M, et al: Rectal afferent function in patients with inflammatory and functional intestinal disorders. Pain 66:151, 1996 10. Best WR, Bectel JM, Singleton JW, et al: Development of the Crohn's disease activity index. Gastroenterology 70:439, 1976 11. Billing A, Moos R Life stressors and social resources affect post-treatment outcomes among depressed patients. J Abnorm Psycho1 94940,1985 12. Camilleri M, Mayer EA, Drossman DA, et al: Improvement in pain and bowel function in female irritable bowel patients with alosetron, a 5HT3-receptor antagonist. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 13:610, 1999 13. Cassell J: The contribution of the social environment to host resistance. Am J Epidemi01 104:107, 1976 14. Chalifoux LV, Bronson RT: Colonic adenocarcinoma associated with chronic colitis in cotton top marmosets, Saguinus oedipus. Gastroenterology 80:942, 1981 15. Chrousos GP: The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and immune-mediated inflammation. N Engl J Med 3321351,1995 16. Clouse RE: Antidipressants for functional gastrointestinal syndromes. Dig Dis Sci 39:2352, 1994 17. Cohen S, Syme SL: Issues in the study and application of social support. In Cohen S, Syme SL (eds): Social Support and Health. Orlando, Academic Press, 1985 18. Collins SM, Hurst SM, Main C, et al: Effect of inflammation of enteric nerves: Cytokine-induced changes in neurotransmitter content and release. Ann N Y Acad Sci 664:415, 1997 19. Collins SM, McHugh K, Jacobson K, et al: Previous inflammation alters the response of the rat colon to stress. Gastroenterology 111:1509, 1996 20. Collins SM, Van Assche G, Hogaboam C: Alterations in enteric nerve and smooth muscle function in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 3:38, 1997

248

RINGEL & DROSSlvLAN

21. Crofford LJ, Rader JI, Dalakas MC, et al: L-tryptophan implicated in human eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome causes fasciitis and perimyositis in the Lewis rat. J Clin Invest 861757,1990 22. Dapoigny M, Abitbol JL, Fraitag B Efficacy of peripheral kappa agonist, fedotozine, vs. placebo in treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: A multicenter dose-response study. Dig Dis Sci 402244,1995 24. De Schryver-Kecskemeti K, Bennert KW, Cooper GS, et al: Gastrointestinal involvement in L-tryptophan (L-Trp) associated eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome (EMS). Dig Dis Sci 37697, 1992 25. Dennis C: The response to vagotomy in for idiopathic ulcerative colitis and regional enteritis. Ann Surg 128:479,1946 26. DeVaul RA, Faillace LA Persistent pain and illness insistence: A medical profile of proneness to surgery. Am J Surg 135:828, 1978 27. Drossman DA: Quality of life in IBD: Methods and findings. In Rachmilewitz D (ed): Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, 1994. Falk Symposium #72. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994, pp 105-116 28. Drossman D A Inflammatory bowel disease. In Spilker B (ed): Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. New York, Raven Press, 1996, p 925 29. Drossman DA: Presidential address: Gastrointestinal illness and biopsychosocial model. Psychosom Med 60258,1998 30. Drossman D A Gastrointestinal illness and the biopsychosocial model. J Clin Gastroenterol22:252, 1996 31. Drossman D A Psychosocial sound bites: exercises in the patient-doctor relationship. Am J Gastroenterology 921418, 1997 32. Drossman DA: Psychosocial factors in the care of patients with gastrointestinal disorders. In Yamada T (ed): Textbook of Gastroenterology. Philadelphia, LippincottRaven, 1998 33. Drossman D A Psychosocial aspects of inflammatory bowel disease. Stress Med 2119,1986 34. Drossman DA: Psychosocial Factors in Gastrointestinal Disorders. In Feldman M, Scharschmidt B, Sleisenger MH (eds): Sleisenger and Fordtran’s Gastrointestinal Disease. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1997, p 69 35. Drossman DA, Leserman J, Li Z, et al: Effects of coping on health outcome among female patients with gastrointestinal disorders. Psychosom Med 62:309-317,2000 36. Drossman D A Is the cotton-topped tamarin a model for behavioral research? Dig Dis Sci 3O(suppl):24, 1985 37. Drossman DA, Creed FH, Olden KW, et al: Psychosocial aspects of functional gastrointestinal disorders. In Drossman DA, Corazziari E, Tally NJ, et a1 (eds): The Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Diagnosis, Pathophysiology and Treatment. A Multinational Concensus, ed 2. McLean, VA, Degnon Associates, 2000 38. Drossman DA, Leserman J, Mitchell CM, et al: Health status and health care use in persons with inflammatory bowel disease: A national sample. Dig Dis Sci 36:1746, 1991 39. Drossman DA, Patrick DL, Mitchell CM, et al: Health related quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease: Functional status and patient worries and concerns. Dig Dis Sci 34:1379,1989 40. Drossman DA, Li Z, Leserman J, et al: Health status by gastrointestinal diagnosis and abuse history. Gastroenterology 110999, 1996 41. Drossman DA, Talley NJ, Olden KW, et al: Sexual and physical abuse and gastrointestinal illness: Review and recommendations. Ann Intern Med 123:782, 1995 42. Drossman DA, Leserman J, Li Z, et a1 The rating form of IBD patient concerns: A new measure of health status. Psychosom Med 53:701, 1991 43. Drossman D A Psychological factors in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. In Kirsner JB (ed): Inflammatory Bowel Disease, ed 5. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 2000, P 342 44. Duffy LC, Zielezny MA, Marshall JR, et al: Relevance of major stress events as an indicator of disease activity prevalence in inflammatory bowel disease. Behav Med 17101, 1991

PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF CROHNS DISEASE

249

45. Eisen GM, Locke GR 111, Provenzale D: Health-related quality of life: A primer for gastroenterologists. Am J Gastroenterol 94:2017, 1999 46. Eisen GM, Strauss W, Sandler RS, et al: Health status in Crohn’s disease: Comparison of the rating form of IBD patient concerns in African and non-African Americans [abstract]. Gastroenterology 1996 47. Engel G L The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science 196:129, 1977 48. Engel G L Psychological factors in ulcerative colitis in man and gibbon. Gastroenterology 57362,1969 49. Fava GA, Pavan L Large bowel disorders: 11. Psychopathology and alexithymia. Psychother Psychosom 27100, 1977 50. Garrett JW, Drossman DA: Health status in inflammatory bowel disease: Biological and behavioral considerations. Gastroenterology 99:90, 1990 51. Garrett VD, Brantley PJ, Jones GN, et a1 The relation between daily stress and Crohn’s disease. J Behav Med 14237, 1991 52. Gazzard BG 86, Price HL, Libby GW, et al: The social toll of Crohn’s disease. BMJ 2:1117, 1978 53. Geboes K. Collins SM: Structural chanees in the enteric nervous svstem in inflammatory bowel disease. Neurogastroenterz Motil 10:189,1998 54. Geisser ME, Robinson ME, Keefe FJ, et al: Catastrophizing, depression and sensory, affective and evaluation aspects of chronic pain. Pain 59:79,1994 55. Gozalo A, Montoya E: Mortality causes of the moustached tamarin (Suguinus mystux) in captivity. J Med Primatol21:35, 1992 56. Gue M, Junien JL, Bueno L Conditioned emotional response in rats enhances colonic motility through the central release of corticotropin-releasing factor. Gastroenterology 100964,1991 57. Gue M, Del Rio-lacheze C, Eutamene H, et al: Stress-induced visceral hypersensitivity to rectal distention in rats: Role of CRF and mast cells. Neurogastroenterol Motil 9:271, 1997 58. Gue M, Bonbonne C, Fioramonti J, et al: Stress-induced enhancement of colitis in rats: CRF and arginine vasopressin are not involved. Am J Physiol272:G84,1997 59. Harvey RF, Bradshaw J M A simple index of Crohn’s disease activity. Lancet 1:514, 1980 60. Helzer JE, Chnnas S, Norland CC, et al: A study of the association between Crohn’s disease and psychiatric illness. Gastroenterology 86:324, 1984 61. Helzer JE, Stilling WA, Chammas S, et al: A controlled study of the association between ulcerative colitis and psychiatric diagnosis. Dig Dis Sci 27513,1982 62. Irvine EJ, Feagan B, Rochon J, et al: Quality of life: A valid and reliable measure of therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 106:287, 1994 63. Jacobson K, McHugh K, Collins SM: Experimental colitis alters myenteric nerve function at inflamed and noninflamed sites in the rat. Gastroenterology 109:718,1995 64.Jantschek G, Zeitz M, Pritsch M, et a1 and the German study group on psychosocial intervention in Crohn’s disease: Effect of psychotherapy on the course of Crohn’s disease: Results from the German prospective multicenter psychotherapy treatment study on Crohn’s disease. Scand J Gastroenterol33:1289, 1998 65. Kaplan M: The Psychiatric Treatment of Patients with Crohn’s Disease. In Pantera C, Korelitz BI (eds): Crohn’s Disease. New York, Marcel Dekker, 1996, p 455 66. Katon W The impact of major depression on chronic medical illness. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 18:215, 1996 sing hormone in colonic 67. Kawahito Y, Sano H, Mukai S, et mucosa in patients with ulcerative c 68. Keefe FJ, Williams D A A comparison of coping strategies in chronic pain patients in different age groups. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences 45:161, 1990 69. Keefe FJ, Brown GK, Wallston KA, et a1 Coping with rheumatoid arthritis pain: Catastrophizing as a maladaptive strategy. Pain 3751, 1989 70. Khan I, Kataeva G, Blennerhassett MG, et al: Auto-induction of interleukin l b gene expression in enteric smooth muscle cells [abstract]. Gastroenterology 104:534, 1993

250

RINGEL & DROSSMAN

71. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Glaser R Psychoneuroimmunology and health consequences: Data and shared mechanisms [review]. Psychosom Med 57269,1995 72. Kinash RG, Fischer DG, Lukie BE, et al: Coping patterns and related characteristics in patients with IBD. Rehabil Nurs 18:12, 1993 73. Latimer PR Crohn’s disease: A review of the psychological and social outcome. Psychol Med 8:469,1978 74. Laws A: Does a history of sexual abuse in childhood play a role in women’s medical problems? A review. J Womens Health 2165, 1993 75. Lazarus RS, Folkman S: Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, Verlag, 1984 76. Lazarus RS: Coping theory and research Past, present, and future. Psychosom Med 55:234, 1993 77. Levenstein S, Li Z, Drossman D A Cross-cultural variation in disease-related concerns among patients with inflammatory bowel disease [abstract]. Gastroenterology 1141021, 1998 78. Lewis MC: Attributions and inflammatory bowel disease: Patients’ perceptions of illness causes and the effects of these perceptions on relationships. AARN News Letter 16, May 1998 79. Lipkin MJ, Kaplan C, Clark W, et al: Teaching medical interviewing: The Lipkin model. In Lipkin MJ, Putnam SM, Lazare A (eds): The Medical Interview: Clinical Care, Education, and Research. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1995, p 422 80. Mayer L: Current concepts of inflammatory bowel disease etiology and pathogenesis. In Kirsner JB (ed): Inflammatory Bowel Disease, ed 5. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 2000 81. Love JR, Irvine EJ, Fedorak RN: Quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 1415, 1992 82. Lumley MA, Stettner L, Wehmer F How are alexithymia and physical illness linked? A review and critique of pathways. J Psychosom Res 41:505,1996 83. Mange1 AW, Northcutt AR The safety and efficacy of alosetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist in female irritable bowel syndrome patients. Aliment Pharm Ther 13(suppl 2):77, 1999 84. Mayer EA, Raybould HE: Role of visceral afferent mechanisms in functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 99:1688, 1990 85. Mayer EA, Gebhart G F Basic and clinical aspects of visceral hyperalgesia. Gastroenterology 107271, 1994 86. McCall RD, Haskill S, Zimmerman EM, et al: Tissue interleukin 1 and interleukin1 receptor antagonist expression in enterocolitis in resistant and susceptible rats. Gastroenterology 106:972, 1994 87. McHugh K, Weingarten HP, Keenan C, et al: On the suppression of food intake in experimental models of colitis in the rat. Am J Physiol264:R871,1993 88. McHugh KJ, Collins SM, Weingarten HI? Central interleukin-1 receptors contribute to suppression of feeding after acute colitis in the rat. Am J Physiol266:R1659, 1994 89. McKegney FP, Gordon RO, Levine SM A psychosomatic comparison of patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Psychosom Med 32153,1970 90. Mechanic D: The concept of illness behavior: Culture, situation, and personal predisposition. Psychol Med 16:1, 1986 91. Milne B, Joachim G, Niedhardt J: A stress management program for inflammatory bowel disease.1986. J Adv Nurs 11:561, 1986 92. Mitchell CM, Drossman DA: Survey of the AGA membership relating to patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gastroenterology 921282,1987 93. Morgan WLJ, Engel G L The approach to the medical interview. In Morgan WLJ, Engel GL (eds): The Clinical Approach to the Patient. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1969, p 26 95. Moser G, Tillinger W, Sachs G, et al: Disease related concerns: A study on outpatients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 7853, 1995 96. Muelas MS, Ramirez P, Parilla P, et al: Vagal system involvement in small bowel motility during restraint stress: an experimental study in the dog. Br J Surg 80:479, 1993

PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF CROHNS DISEASE

251

97. Mulugeta M, Anton P, Tache Y Chronic stress potentiates TNB-induced colitis differentially in female Lewis and Fischer rats [abstract]. Gastroenterology 110:969, 1996 98. North CS, Alpers DH, Helzer JE, et al: Do life events or depression exacerbate inflammatory bowel disease? Ann Intem Med 114381, 1991 99. North CS, Clouse RE, Spitznagel EL, et a1 The relation of ulcerative colitis to psychiatric factors: A review of findings and methods. Am J Psychiatry 147974,1990 100. Porter RW, Brady JV,Conrad D, et al: Some experimental observations on gastrointestinal lesions in behaviorally conditioned monkeys. Psychosom Med 20379,1958 101. Qiu BS, Vallance BA, Blennerhassett PA, et al: The role of CD+ lymphocytes in the susceptibility of mice to stress-induced reactivation of experimental colitis. Nat Med 5:i178-1182,i999 102. Rao SSC, Hatfield RA, Suls JM, et a1 Psychological and physical stress induce differential effects on human colonic motility. Am J Gastroenterol93:985, 1998 103. Robertson DAF, Ray J, Diamond I, et al: Personality profile and affective state of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 30623, 1989 104. Sartor RB, Cromartie WJ, Powell DW, et a1 Granulomatous enterocolitis induced in rats by purified bacterial cell wall fragments. Gastroenterology 89:587, 1985 105. Sartor RB, DeLa Cadena RA, Green KD, et al: Selective kallikrein-kinin system activation in inbred rats differentially susceptible to granulomatous enterocolitis. Gastroenterology 110:1467, 1996 106. Saunders PR, Kosecka U, McKay DM, et al: Acute stressors stimulate ion secretion and increase epithelial permeability in rat intestine. Am J Physiol 267G794, 1994 107. Schwarz SP, Blanchard E B Evaluation of a psychological treatment for inflammatory bowel disease. Behav Res Ther 29167, 1991 108. Schwarz SP, Blanchard EB: Inflammatory bowel disease: A review of the psychological assessment and treatment literature. Ann Behav Med 1295, 1990 109. Shafiroff BGP, Hinton JW: Denervation of the pelvic colon for ulcerative colitis. Surg Forum 1:134,1950 110. Shumaker SA, Anderson RT, Czajkowski SM: Psychological test and scales. In Spilker B (ed): Quality of life assessment in clinical trials. New York, Raven Press, 1990, p 272 111. Sifneos PE: The prevalence of alexyithymic characteristics in psychsomatic patients. Psychother Psychosom 22255,1973 112. Stemberg EM, Chrousos GP, Wilder RL, et al: The stress response and the regulation of inflammatory bowel disease. Ann Intern Med 117854, 1992 113. Stemberg EM: Perspectives series: Cytokines and the brain. J Clin Invest 100:2641, 1997 114. Stemberg EM, Parker C W Pharmacologic aspects of lymphocyte regulation. In Marchalonis JJ (ed): The Lymphocyte: Structure and Function. New York, Marcel Dekker, 1988, p 1 115. Stout C, Snyder R L Ulcerative colitis-like lesions in Siamang gibbons. Gastroenterology 57256,1969 116. Tarter RE, Switala J, Carra J, et al: Inflammatory bowel disease: Psychiatric status before and after disease onset. Int J Psychiatry Med 17:173, 1987 117. Taylor G, Doody K, Newman A Alexithymic characteristics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Can J Psychiatry 26470, 1981 118. Taylor GJ, Bagby RM, Parker JD: The alexithymia construct: A potential paradigm for psychosomatic medicine. Psychosomatics 32:153, 1991 119. Testa MA, Simonson DC: Assessment of quality of life outcome. N Engl J Med 334:835,1996 120. Thorek P: Vagotomy for idiopathic ulcerative colitis and regional enteritis. JAMA 145:140, 1951 121. Van Hees PAM, Van Elteren PH, Van Lier HJJ, et al: An index of inflammatory activity in patients with Crohn's disease. Gut 21:279, 1980 122. Walker WE, Gelfand MD, Gelfand AN, et a1 The relationship of current psychiatric disorder to functional disability and distress in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 18:220, 1996 123. Ware JE, Sherboume CD: The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473, 1992

252

RINGEL & DROSSMAN

124. Watkins LR, Maier SF, Goehler LE: Cytokine-to-brain communication: A review & analysis of alternative mechanisms. Life Sci 57:1011, 1995 125. Weiner H Psychobiology and Human Disease. New York, Elsevier Science Publishing, 1977 126. Wittmann T, Crenner F, Angel F, et a1 Long duration stress: Immediate and late effects on small and large bowel motility in rats. Dig Dis Sci 35:495, 1990 127. Wood JD, Peck OC, Tefend KS, et a1 Colitis and colon cancer in cotton-top tamarins (Suguinus oedipus oedipus) living wild in their natural habitat. Dig Dis Sci 43443, 1998 128. Write JP, Marks IN, Parfitt A: Simple clinical index of Crohn’s disease activity: The Cape Town index. South Ah Med J 502:68,1986 129. Yazdanpanah Y, Klein 0, Gambiez L, et al: Impact of surgery on quality of life in Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 92:1897, 1997 130. Young LD, Richter JE, Anderson KO, et a1 The effects of psychological and environmental stressors on peristaltic esophageal contractions in healthy volunteers. Psychophysiology 24:132, 1987

Address reprint requests to Yehuda Ringel, MD Division of Digestive Diseases 774 Bumett-Womack Building CB7080 University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7080