97
Journalofh~olecuhrStmcture,111(1983)97-102 ElsevierSciencePublishers B.V.. Amsterdam-Printedin
PULSED
B.C.
AN
NQR:
SANCTUARY
Department
OF
F.0.
and
2K6,
SELECTIVE
EXCITATION
TFXHE
of Chemistry,
~34
Quebec,
EXAMPLX
The Netherlands
McGill
University,
801
Sherbrooke
St.
West,
Montreal,
Canada
INTRODUCTION In pulsed
?XUR the
to bs preferable
are
all
developed
where
(7) to cover
the
to pulse
large
effects
of rf guises
betveen
-,,2,
correspond be a cotmon
with
field
-1
and
consider
The
the
EXCITATION
multi_wle
(ref.81
in terms
rotation
group.
spherical
NQR
levels,
are
(1.2) all
pulses
and
has
that
found
should
frequency
recently
spectral
ensure
are
various
range
been
frequencies
is particularly it
are
pertinent
to NQR
is rarely
possible
pure pulses.
which
advantages
no
gives
rise
longer
the
NHR
initial
with that
integer
'--'
1/2,
selective
spin
there
(e.g. fra
or,
will
as in I = 1 both
the
rf
rotations.
formulation
case.
In
to transitions 3/2
to effects
purely
the
condition.
such
frequencies
of a multiplet
with
and
for
spectral
This
any
of I = 3/2
to describe
magnitude;
corresponding
quadrupole
In contrast,
are
for
frequencies
by two
is used
of arbitrary
predicted
by the
shared
excitations
spins
as in case
affected
The
of selective
theory
pulse
is extended
to
in NQR.
IN NHR
formulation
of NUR
of a multipole Physically
k
simply
the
(ref.3-7)
operator describes
corn_ponent, q = A m defines
polarizations operator,
single
pure
starting
applications
SELECTIVE
that
level
outlined
not
constant
bs completely
of
quadrupole
paper
are
to
duration
NMR
of selective
<---> 0 I 0 c---> 1).
the
In this theory
theory
will
pairs
always
in which
&functions
of the
infinitely-short
pulse
irradiation
involving
are'not
pulses
case
NMR
it is shovn
isolated
<-->
ideal the
pulsed
coupling
to
rotations
simultaneously.
experimznts
particular,
-3/2
quadrupolar
the
cases
Selective
frequencies
paper
NQR
such both
selectively
those
pulsed.
all
In this pulsed
for
corresponding
prodzce
in principle
A theory
sizaultaneously
pulses
simply
in practice
frequencies,
finite.
of pure
they
whilst
polarizations. cover
use
since
the
expectation
writes
basis the
vhich
multipole
the
spin
density
is irreducible character
and
multiquantum
coherences
value
corresponding
of the
operator under
the
the
(ref.6).
The
nulti_wle
viz: (1)
0022-2860/83/$03.00
0 1983 Elsevier Science Publi&ersB.V.
98
.. ,.
Such
kuouledge
The
spin
of
density
the
nuclear
opekatoz 21
=A( 21+1
UIW
where
the
au,(t)
is the
the
nultipole
spin
basis
state.
as,
(2)
+)~kqtI,i
pro&aI-y,yktZ standard
vkq,
has
been
used.
The
tima
evolution
is
&a,
Hamiltonian
In solving one
dif f exantial
exp(
U =
commutator equation
(3)
for
it will
(31,
of form
Instead,
describes
in the
[)rlrul(t)l_
=
at
operators
completely
be written
kolq=-k
by the
j’.
can
+k 2
z
adjoi+
determined
vherex
EI+
polarizations
oI(t)
is
be
the
system.
seen
-Ok),
that
exponentiation
in
as
calculated
and
a set
of
has
(ref.13).
anduse
been
of unitary
completely
or' coupled
first
avoided.
order
obtained,
(4)
irhereeisa of the
(2)
vector
spanning
indices
k and
has
q, and
a matrix
representation
form
(5)
kq,k'q'
It is clear derived
that
in part
is necessary Tbi
the from
the
initiaI
maltipole
theory
of
selective
irradiated
features.
For l/2;
transitiors level
tion
formalism share
of the
Such
an
v-rite fonaaI operator
the
the
mlti$let~&xept
equations
NQR
of adjacent
these
levels
spin
are
(ref.7)
will
act
on a
analagous
on the
l/2:
a multiplet 1.
transitions subspac+2
(l>-(5).
The
two
within spin
straight and
allw
multiplet
q =
a zultiplet
When
Fuxther is
subset
strongest
define
excited
in Fig.
(2Ir$?)
to
to
(41.
quimtum
the
(ref.5).
It
of
multiplet
single are
be used
(5) are
op&ators.
a soluticm
only
simultaneously
to multiquantum spin
HKR
elsewhere
is not
(4) and
to obtain
frequencies
may
illustrated
in
Liouville
f ocusses
discussed
level
level'construction
I, multiplot
k(O)
excitation
has..been
multiple=
with
In conventional for
a co-n
implicit
dealing
conditions
pulse-
observed:
q = fl pairs the
that
with
by the are
submanifold,
applies
(ref.91
s_=cify
Art = fl cohereno&
of
representations
ideas
to
of levels
s#_u
and
concepts earlier
of
a three 1 nov
generalizaforward. one spin
to density
is then
(6)
Vhicbis
particularly
simple
for
IH=
l/2,
or
1.
For
a Hamiltoni&
99
L-1 (a)
Selective excitation of (a) one transition defining an quantum transitions defining an k=', multiplet spin.
Fig.1. single
{31~-I(Ifl)}-%xw,co~(ti-~)
where
Q is the phase
selective
w, eff=
J(I+m)(I-mtl)
and
the
quadrupolr
for
In=
1
,
Geff =
the
and
the
w
= yHo,
rf amplitude
it is found
is replaced
and
(b) two
sin(k.-0)
that
for
(ref.3,10)
the
(7)
single
quantum
by
(8)
"1 term
G
effective
is replaced
term
For
by ceff(ref.3).
IH=
l/2,
Qeff=
0 and
is
2Q
(9)
1(21-l)
It is significant of z,' the result
angle
excitation,
+ fiIyw,
I&,
for
that
effect
multiplet
of an rf pulse
is a pure
rotation
spins
is solely
iM = j/2,
regardless
determined
by the
of the
rf Zeeman
magnitude term-
The
(ref.6,7),
(10)
The
angles
in the origin
may
arising being
be
fram spread
ligner
For
&I,,
and
2w,
factors
of the
(21+1)
levels are
lnplies .
the
pulse
quadru_pole
both
physically
cntrices
a selective
for
on and
w, is replaced
localization over
and*;:
rf and
given
interpreted
rotation
(ref.12)
B are
context,
of the
these
both
a and
present
found as
IH
use
frame
on a multiplet
interactions
mast
of
the
(21n+l)
the
defined spin
that
processes
in y and
non-selective
with
conditions
It is seen
in'selective
increases
rf to the
defined
off-resonance
U, eff-
as in the
rotating
acting
by
subspace, In
convention , -iq = e
1,=-l,
be considered.
(ref.lO.11);
effective
case.
by.%
the
This
(ref.6); (8) is the
rf power
rather (70)
of Ednds uot 0; combination
has
been
than
the
of
solved
by
100 perturbation
theory
rf amplitude
is larger
is less
6.
than
selective
than
clearly
in the limits
lw,
w, whilst
effktive
result
the
!0,~>!5:
1-t
the
The
pulses.
&L?+,:
Qefl
(ref.31
jGeff i.
effl’
Since
quadrupole
is particularly
the
effective
coupling
constant
easily
satisfied
by
is,
(12)
eff
,
Aw/Q
co9
8=
and
vhere
is gives
(13)
the
effective
quadnpole
occurring
in the
development
matrices
H =
(t)
by*
&ff = The
(14)
forms
of the H rratricw for
tref.6);
g(t)
single
for
quantum
I < 9/2
and
it
process
for
IH=
1 have
hen
given
elsewhere
is simply,
=
(15) .
Clearly
a, pure
to visualize simplifies The within
In=
correspontig
for
outlined
done
in NQR
of In=
case use
at
l/2
is physically
resonance,
easier
(eq- 11)
b2=0
1P_=l.
here
21 +1 subset of H Sensity operator
the
to
1, alth0ugi-1 in actuzl
corsiderably
treatment
mfitiplet easily
rotation
than
describes
single
levels.
To
from
full
problems,
the
expecially
density vhen
selective
excitations
it is necessary
to extract
quantum
be of use,
the
This
matrix
o_perator.
system
is initially
the
is
at
equilibrium.
PUISm
NQR
Asan
example,
principle The
axis
equilibrium
o,,,(O)
where,
=
the
density
k[E3,2
rs
Fn
case'of
convention
and matrix
an axially in the
vtric
absence
qua&pole
for
of an external
field
paper
operator,is
(16)
0
-1
01
a
III,
0 0
within
+ 9;(O>y20(I)}
010 0
I=3/2
is treated.
.(17)
and
20 =
0
Y
..o i
0
0
1 0 0. 1 0
O-l
0
0 0
(18) 1
101
The
matrix
easily
decomposed
a,,,,(O) The
representations
t{E
=
into
3/Z
of
%2(3/2)
4:
levels
0
=$
0
-i
equation
An
(18)
is
l/2 tc give,
(l/2
bl) refer
to an
the
up_pe-st,
and
H,
&=
l/2 multiplet
m-l,
represented
ZI'O &l/2
(-l/2)
spin
of two
in matrix
(6)
/a
o\
H
!j
(2G'
it follows
important to the
(22)
aspect
of
this
<-- > l/2
3/2
degenerate
states
needed
the
and
1 1 -1 4oOy y)
and
picture
is that
transition
and
inply
the
clearly
-18
O
0
0
o\
!
H _si
(2')
that
Oi($ $1 = i+;(O) refer
of
Equation
by I1
From
spins
(ref.5).
(19)
(M) and
composed
notation
multiplet
basis
Px'
-
notation
states
to the
refer
that
the
the
-3/2
nultiplet
-i+:(O)
=
(23)
trrO multiplet <-->
-l/2
spins
of
transition.
spin
(l/2
l/2)
l/2 The
is not
Y" and
-l/2
<---> l/2
two of the three
only
I = 3/2
at zero
on each
multiplet
gives
the
full
modification Eq.
(10)
spin
t,
Chwsing
as
invoking
in NQR NMR
duration
of
for
the
(8)
the
([cK~~~),
formalism the
Eq.
(10)
the
+3/2
are
is precisely
excited,
describes results after
iS the
Zeeman
It
excited.
processes Eq.
c3,2
from
w.
is not
substituting
matrix,
the
frequency
and
l/2;
density
for
quantum
is selective.
required
quadru__wle (LW~,
single
field
derived
transition
the frcu
the
zbsence
that
the
effects Eq.
of the
on
of a pulse
10 into The
pulse.
because
pulse
Eq.
19
only
rotating
fr-
in
frequency.
pulse,
at resonance
<---> +
l/2 transition,
with
the
pure
so that
APO
and
gives
@:(t,) = pIv11(I)a3,2(t)] =i
Since the
+i(tu)
pulse..
9,(t,) for
=
phase
ref.11
r/3/10 0; sin(J3w,tw)
a
the
-JZ
ok
angle
with
,
Hence
of
Q:(O)
the
two
result
sin
Q = O= -1.
sin
ei@
w t ow
corn_pcnents of
(24)
0: correspond
to
and
after
is simply
(r'3wltw) This
agrees
sin
w OWt
with
(25)
= 2/r/5 the
expression
Eq.(13)
calculated
in
'102 CON(ILUSION
.&D
Provided inter-
the
z Q,,=
of necessity
0, even
Ucxover.
necessary
operdtor total
irradiation
for
spin
ls only
pertuibing
system can be described
spin
constants.
only
GEX&.ALIBATIONS
the
spin
I, as
the in
operator
of
presence
kf amplitude
.to extract
density
in the
a single
spins
use
(ref,6); aI(
large
Cl01
The
?/at
fraa
and
reinsert
X=3/2
the
for
any
half-
these
all
have
coupling
according
l/2 of
case
of
qua-polar
is increased
multiplet
resonance,
spins
by &tiplet
(8).
It is
spin
density
result
In the
to
total the NKR
is treated
in III
(ref.51. For
except and
integer
the
share
common
multiplet by
Financial Council
the
(14).
by
sane
-1
(11)
sup~rt of Cauada
as
E'urther, of
0.
ths
this
holds
These the
in III. effect
qud.rupolar
provided!
for
treatxzent
<-->
therefore
level; of &=l,
a combination
described
8 9 10 11 12 13
spin
(9) and
rather
spins
1 C---> 0 and
two
,
vork
uas
for
all
are
both
single
transitions
Iu this of the and
w, eff!
tw
case
must
pulse
ti not that
a
zero
pure
may
trzzsitions
in frequency
be treated
is not
geff
rf evolution
quantum
coincident
but
by a Fs given
rotation
but
approxfcately
>> Izeffl.
pravided
by Natural
Sciences
and
Engineering
(NSIRC).
G- Bodenhausen, Prog- NWR S_pectroscopy, :4 (1981). 137. A. Xokaun and R-R: Ernst, J. Chen. Phys., 67(1977), 1752. B.C. Sanctuzry, (Paper V), Wol. Phys., in press (19831. Ides., (Paper I), J. Churn., Phys., 73 (19761, 1048. Id-., (Paper III), Bol. Phys., 48 (19831, 1155. B.C. Sanctuary, T-K. Halstead and P. Osment, ibid., .in press (1983). B.C. Sanctuary and T-K- Balstead, (paper IX), J- Bag. Resonance, 53(19831. 187. u. Faso, Rev. nod. Ehys., 29 (1957), 74. C-N- Banweil and H. RiPas, Mol. Phys-, 6 (19631, 225. S. vega, J. Che!a. Phys., 68 (19771, 5586. H. Blocn, B. Hekzw.and E-L. Hahn, Phys. Rev., 97 (1955) 1699. A-R- Edeon&, 1960, Angular #omentm in Quantum Mechanics, (Princeton Univ.). T-P. Das and A-RS&a, Phys- Rev-, 98 (1955). 316.