Vol. 116, No. 3, 1983
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS Pages 1 076-I 083
November 15, 1983
PURIFICATION AND PARTIAL SEQUENCING OF HUMAN PLACENTAL ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE Elhanan Ezra*, Russell Blacher + and Sidney Udenfriend* Roche Institute of Molecular Biology* and Department of Molecular Genetics + Roche Research Center Nutley, New Jersey 07110 Received October 5, 1983 SUMMARY: Two forms of human placental alkaline phosphatase have been purified to homogeneity utilizing high performance liquid chromatography. Both have the same amino acid composition but they differ in their carbohydrate substituents. Sequence data indicate that the two forms are identical for the first forty two residues from the amino terminus are presented.
Mammalian alkaline phosphatases
(E.C. 3:1.31) have been known for
almost 70 years and have received intensive study because of their utility in clinical diagnosis
(i). Much is therefore known about their physical and
catalytic properties
(2). There appear to be a number of tissue-specific
forms of alkaline phosphatase, immunological
supposedly,
isozymes.
Based on genetic and
studies and on physical properties at least three forms of
human alkaline phosphatase have been identified, bone (liver and kidney)(3,4).
placental,
intestinal and
There have been a number of reports on the
purification of each of the recognized forms of alkaline phosphatase However, terized.
from a structural standpoint Alkaline phosphatases
to be quite heterogeneous
(5).
these enzymes have yet to be charac-
extracted from most tissues have been shown
(6) and it is not clear from most published reports
whether the methods used were adequate for resolving individual components of a given tissue form of the enzyme. The introduction of high performance purification
liquid chromatography
to protein
encouraged us to apply the technique to alkaline phosphatases.
In fact Chang et al.
(7) had already shown the practicability
exchange HPLC to calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase.
of applying ion
We have applied ion
exchange HPLC as well as reversed phase HPLC to the purification of human
0006-291X/83 $I .50 Copyright © 1983 by Academ~ Press, ~c. A fl r ~ h ~ o f reproduct~n m any form reserved.
1076
VOI. 116, No. 3, 1 9 8 3
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
alkaline phosphatases.
In this report we present the purification
geneity of two forms of human placental alkaline phosphatase. weights,
to homo-
Molecular
amino acid analyses and partial sequence data are presented.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Commercial human placental alkaline phosphatase was obtained from Sigma, (Type XXIV; 15.6 U/mg) (St. Louis, MO) and the Green Cross Corp. (Code 3000) (Osaka, Japan). The enzyme was also extracted from freshly obtained human placenta by standard procedures (8). Diethanolamine and p-nitrophenylphosphate were purchased from Sigma. 4-Ethylmorpholine (Fluka A.G., Buchs, Switzerland), l-propanol, and acetone were distilled over ninhydrin. Materials for gel electrophoresis were obtained from BioRad Labs (Richmond, CA). The weak anion exchange column NU-Gel, 200 nm pore size (1.5 x 22 c m ) , was obtained from Separation Industries, Metuchen, NJ. The strong anion exchange column Mono Q (HR 5/5) was obtained from Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden. Cyanopropyl bonded silica support, 300 nm pore size, was obtained from J.T. Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ. The buffer used in all chromatography systems was 4-ethylmorpholine acetate, 20 mM, pH 7.4, which also contained 1 mM MgCI 2 and 20 ~M ZnSO4 to stabilize the enzyme. For ion exchange chromatography 5 percent l-propanol was added and a gradient of NaCI was superimposed on the buffer. For reversed phase HPLC i00 mM sodium acetate was added to the buffer solution prior to mixing with the l-propanol gradient. All chromatography was carried out at 4°C at flow rates of 30-40 ml/hr. Post-column fluorescence detection was carried out with fluorescamine (Hoffmann La Roche Inc., Nutley, NJ) as described previously (9). Three to four percent of the column effluent was directed toward the fluorescence monitoring system. Protein was assayed by the fluorescamine procedure (9) with bovine serum albumin as the standard. Phosphate activity was measured at pH 9.8 in micro titer plates using 1.0 M diethanolamine buffer and p-nitrophenyl-phosphate as substrate as described in the instructions in the Sigma catalog. One unit of enzyme activity represents one umol of substrate hydrolyzed per min at 37°C. Amino acid composition was determined by the fluorescamine procedure (i0) using approximately 1 ~g quantities o f p u r e enzyme. For cysteine analysis samples were reduced and treated with iodoacetic acid as described by Hirs (ii). Carboxymethylated proteins were purified by the HPLC procedure of Pan et al. (12). Neutral and amino sugars were assayed by the methods used by Kilpatrick et al. (13). Protein microsequencing was carried out on 400 pmols (25 ng) of enzyme using an Applied Biosystems model 470A sequencer (14). PTH amino acids at each cycle were identified by HPLC using a Beckman Ultrasphere ODS column and trifluoroacetic acid/acetonitrile buffer system (15). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Three preparations tigated.
of human placental alkaline p h o s p h a t a s e w e r e
Two were commercial samples that had been partially purified.
other was from freshly obtained tissue. genity.
What is most important
the purification another.
invesThe
All three demonstrated marked hetero-
is that patterns of elution at each step of
Shown in Table I differed markedly from one preparation
to
What appeared as a major peak in one preparation was either absent
or a minor peak in another.
A most probable explanation of this hetero-
1077
Vol. 116, No. 3, 1983 Table I. Step
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS Purification of Human Placental Alkaline Phosphatase Specific Fold Activity Protein Activity Purification Recovery units mg units/mg %
Starting Material DEA
NU-Gel I II III IV
7806
287
27
1
i00
-
Mono Q M-I M-2 M-3 Cyanopropyl C-I C-2
407 2630 2351 1431
9.3 13.2 18.8 37.8
44 199 125 38
1.6 7.4 4.6 1.4
5.2 33.7 30.1 18.3
1541 514 108
5.4 2.9 1.9
285 177 56
10.6 6.6 2.1
19.7 6.6 1.4
678 465
0.38 0.25
1784 1860
66 69
8.7 6.0
geneity is differences in the degree of glycosylation of the enzyme in each preparation.
Some heterogeneity in a given sample is probably inherent in
the post-translational processing of the enzyme (16).
However,
the large
differences that we observed from sample to sample could only represent artifacts introduced by the different methods of sample preparation.
Com-
mercial preparations may also contain mixtures of several genetic forms of the enzyme (17).
For practical reasons we selected the Sigma preparation for
further study. The conditions for purification of calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase on ion exchange columns that had been worked out by Chang et al. well for the human placental enzyme.
(7) worked
The instability of the enzyme at high
concentrations of organic solvent and at pH values below 5.5 put limitations on the types of reversed phase HPLC systems that could be used. l-propanol concentrations
Since high
(>40%) were required for eluting the enzyme from
RP-8 columns this system was discarded.
With Cyanopropyl columns elution was
achieved in the range of 20 to 30% l-propanol at pH 7.4
This was therefore
adopted for the final step in purification. The alkaline phosphatase preparation N-ethyl morpholine acetate buffer,
(Sigma) was dissolved
(i0 mg/ml) in
25 mM, pH 7.4. Twenty-five ml (250 mg)
were applied to a DEAE NU-Gel column and the chromatogram was developed with the same buffer superimposed on a gradient of NaCI.
1078
As shown in Fig. IA
Vol. 116, N o . 3, 1983
, 40(] ',
BIOCHEMICAL AND
B I O P H Y S I C A L RESEARCH C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
1.00
,,,
~
~"
,
o
E 30(]
~
I~
~
0.75
[]
"r" 03 I-- ~
2oo
oz 0.50
= ~ u)
100
0.25
:m
-~
,,,
_1 O0
20
40
60
80
100
120
80(]
D >I--
600
E
0
o) 0 ,~
400 0 . I'r ffJ U.
0
E Q..
0
-Z
200 _J < v _1
0
100
100
8O
80
oz 6c
60
20
40
60
80
J160 >.
P. ..J
...........
_o"
a.
o no. i
4c
40
20
20
0
(~0
,,
10
20
30
40 50 FRACTION
60
70
810
0
90
100
Fig i. Stages of HPLC purification of human placental alkaline phosphatase. (A) Chromatography on a DEAE NU-Gel column. (B) Chromatography of area II (Fig. IA) on a Mono Q column. (C) Chromatography of M-I (Fraction 34-43, Fig. IB) on a cyanopropyl column.
1079
Vol. 116, No. 3, 1983
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
alkaline phosphatase
activity was eluted over a broad area (fractions 50-
i00), clear evidence of heterogeneity. fractions was almost quantitative
The total recovery of enzyme in all
(Table I). The material eluted from the
chromatogram was arbitrarily divided into five peaks and peaks II and III, that contained the bulk of the activity, were purified further. when chromatographed
on a Mono Q column,
was resolved into at least five
components with alkaline phosphatase activity the complexity of the chromatographic tion of this material.
(data not shown).
Peak II when subjected to chromatography on a Mono Q
activity was in area M-I
When the material in M-I was
on a reversed phase cyanopropyl
column two peaks of protein
that coincided with enzyme activity were clearly resolved two peaks are designated C-I and C-2.
(Fig. IC). These
It should be noted that although
overall recoveries of enzyme activity were excellent the procedure
Most of the
(fractions 34-43) which appeared to contain two
resolved peaks of activity.
rechromatographed
Because of
pattern we did not continue purifica-
column was resolved into three areas, as shown in Fig. IB.
incompletely
Peak III,
(Table I), due to the heterogeneity
(75-90%) at each step of
only microgram quantities
of the final products were obtained. Both C-I and C-2 when
subjected to SDS gel electrophoresis,
were found
to be over 95% pure (Fig. 2) and migrated essentially as single bands with identical M r values.
Amino acid analyses of C-I and C-2
the two differed in sugar composition
were identical but
(Table II). The combination of data
from SDS gels and amino acid assay gave a subunit molecular weight of 70,000, assuming identical subunits. values
(5).
This is in the range of previously reported
However, because of the marked heterogeneity
alkaline phosphatase preparations,
of starting
more precise comparisions
of M r values
from one study to another cannot be made. When subjected to sequencing both C-I and C-2 yielded a single identical amino terminal residue Ile. III,
Sequencing
through residue 42, Shown in Table
was identical for both C-I and C-2. Green and
Sussman
(20) had pre-
viously sequenced the first four residues of placental alkaline phosphatase.
1080
Vol. 116, No. 3, 1983
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
94K
-
68K
-
43K
-
30K
-
21K
-
14K
-
-AP
1
2
3
4
5
Fig. 2. SDS page gel electrophoresis of human placental alkaline phosphatase at stages of purification shown in Fig. i. Electrophoresis was carried out on 8% gels as described (18). Silver staining was used for visualization (19): Lane 1 - 125 ng of protein standards; Lane 2 - 700 ng of the starting material; Lane 3 - 170 ng of M-I (Table I); Lane 4 - 170 ng of peak C-I (Table I); Lane 5 - 170 ng of peak C-2 (Table I). Table II.
Amino Acid and Carbohydrate Composition of Human Placental Alkaline Phosphate
Amino Acids and Sugars
C-I
C-2
Residues/mole
55 Aspartic acid 9.42 9.37 40 Threonine 6.95 6.65 32 Serine 6.37 6.40 60 Glutamic acid 10.19 10.30 Proline 5.66 5.71 33 54 Glycine 9.12 9.68 66 Alanine 10.72 10.61 35 Valine 6.15 6.12 14 Methionine 2.72 2.62 18 Isoleucine 3.09 3.12 48 Leucine 8.07 7.99 22 Tyrosine 3.68 3.68 22 Phenylalanine 3.74 3.65 Histidine 2.75 2.68 16 Lysine 4.02 4.12 24 Arginine 5.93 5.84 40 Cysteine* 0.71 0.72 5 Tryptophan 0.71 0.72 4 Glucosamine 2.42 3.88 14"* 22*** 0 0 Galactosamine 0 0 Mannose 1.61 0.49 i0 3 Galactose 0.65 0.49 4 3 Fucose 0 0 0 0 Xylose 0.48 0 3 0 N-acetyl$1ucosamine *Cysteine was determined after carboxymethylation. N-acetylglucosamine is present but cannot be measured by the procedures that were used. ** = C-I *** = C-2.
1081
Vol. 116, No. 3, 1983
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Table III. Amino Terminal Sequence of Alkaline Phosphatase From Human Placenta i
1o
Ile-Ile-Pro-Val-Glu-Glu-Gtu-Asn-Pro-Asp-Phe-Trp-Asn-Arg-Glu-Ala-Ala-Glu20 30 Ala-Leu-Gly-Ala-Ala-Lys-Lys-Leu-Gln-Pro-Ala-Gln-Thr-Ala-Ala-Lys-Asn-Leu40
(Ile)-Ile-Phe-Leu-Gly-AspThe same sequence was obtained on three individual runs using Peak C-l, C-2 and a mixture of C-I and C-2 that had been carboxymethylated and further purified by HPLC. Average initial yields were better than 80% and the repetitive yield at each cycle averaged about 90%. There is some uncertainty as to the lie at position 37.
Our findings of lle-lle-Pro-Val- at the amino terminus are in accord with their report.
Since alkaline phosphatase is ~ dimer the finding of a single
end group and a single migrating species on SDS gels suggest that the two monomers are identical.
Since C-I and C-2 are identical at their amino
termini and have the same amino acid composition they most likely represent the same polypeptide chain with different carbohydrate components
(Table
III). It should be noted that placental alkaline phosphatase in no way resembles bacterial alkaline phosphatase (21), at least at its amino terminus. We were originally hesitant to subject such a large and highly glycosylated protein to sequencing.
The fact that no problems were encountered in
sequencing the first 42 residues indicates that the sugar residues are not near the amino terminus. The partial sequence of human alkaline phosphatase provides information that can be used to obtain the entire sequence by cloning procedures.
Similar
procedures may be used to purify and characterize the other tissue forms of alkaline phosphatase. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank L o u i s e G e r b e r and Larry Brink for their excellent technical assistance in these studies and to Roy Sun for the carbohydrate analysis. REFERENCES i. 2. 3.
Moss, D.W. (1982) Clin. Chem. 28, 2007-2016. Fernley, H.N. (1971) in The Enzymes, 4, (Boyer, P.D. ed) pp. 417-447, Academic Press, New York. Badger, K.S. and Sussman, H.H. (1976) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73, 2201-2205.
1082
Vol. 116, No. 3, 1983
4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. i0. ii. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21.
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Seargent, L.E. and Stinson, R.A. (1979) Nature (London) 281, 152-154. Stinson, R.A. and Seargent, L.E. (1981) Clinica Chimica Acta ii0, 261-272. Gogolin, K.J., Slaughter, C.A. and Harris, H. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 5061-5065. Chang, S.H., Gooding, K.M., and Regnier; F.E. (1976) J. Chromatog. 125, 103-114. Trepanier, J.M., Seargent, L.E. and Stinson, R.A. (1976) Biochem. J. 155, 653-660. Stein, S. and Moschera, J. (1981) Methods in Enzymology, 79, 7-16 Academic Press, New York. Stein, S. and Brink, L. (1981) Methods in Enzymology, 79, 20-27 Academic Press, New York. Hirs, C.H. (1967) Methods in Enzymology, ii, 199-203 (Hirs, C.H.W. ed) Academic Press, New York. Pan, Y.-C., Wideman, J., Blacher, R. and Stein, S. (manuscript in preparation. Kilpatrick, D., Gibson, K.D. and Jones, B.N. (1983) 224, 402-404, Hewick, R.M., Hunkapiller, M.W., Hood, LIE., Dreyer, W.J. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 7990-7997. Hawke, D., Yuan, P.-M., Shively, J.E. (1982) Anal. Biochem. 120, 302-311. Fumiyuki, I. and Chou, J.Y. (1983) Bioehem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 111, 611-618. Moss, D.W. (1962) Nature (London) 193, 981-982. Laemmli, U.K. (1970) Nature 277, 680-685. Oakley, B., Kirsch, D.R. and Morris, N.R. (1980) Anal. Biochem. 105, 361-363. Greene, P.J., Sussman, H.H. (1973) Proc. Natl ~. Acad. Sci. USA 70, 2936-2940. Bradshaw, R,A., Cancedda, F., Ericsson, L.H., Neumann, P.A., Piccoli, S.P., Schlesinger, M.J., Shriefer, K. and Walsh, K.A. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 6, 3473-3477.
1083