Vol. 68, No. 2, 1976
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
PURIFICATION OF NONBINDABLE AND MEMBRANE-BINDABLE MITOCHONDRIAL HEKOKINASE FROM RAT BRAIN Philip Biochemistry
November
Received
L. Felgner Department, East Lansing,
and John E. Wilson Michigan State University Michigan 48824
24,1975
SUMMARY: MgC12-induced binding of glucose-6-P solubilized rat brain hexokinase to rat liver mitochondria has been found to be markedly diminished by increasing ionic strength. Using a modified assay of binding ability, it has now been possible to demonstrate that purified preparations of brain hexokinase do retain appreciable ability to bind to mitochondria. A slight modification of the previous DEAE-cellulose chromatography procedure (4), permits resolution of the hexokinase into two major components designated as Type Ib and Type I, based on their ability to bind and not bind, respectively, to mitochondria. Ib and I, appear to be identical in molecular size and subunit composition, but differ slightly in net charge.
It
has been demonstrated
as found
in brain,
presumably membrane
selectively
indicating which
understand
membrane
it
the
component(s)
to homogeneity the purified
chondrial a method
for
hexokinase
would
resolution
with
between
it
was not
is
the
the purpose
of purified
and to indicate
hexokinase
Although
previously
bindable
and the outer enzyme and
the enzyme has been possible
to demonstrate with
communication
why this
the mitoto describe
and nonbindable
some of the reasons
to better
the
to interact
of this
of this
In order
to purify
ability
membrane,
components)
the enzyme.
be advantageous
of hexokinase,
mitochondrial
(or
of the membrane. (4),
It
outer
component
interaction
enzyme retained
membrane.
the Type I isozyme
to the
interacts
of the
mitochondrial
that
binds
selectively
requisite
that
some specific
the nature
purified
(l-3)
forms
was not
of
observed
earlier. MATERIALS Chemicals (4,s).
and rats
Hexokinase
Copyright All rights
were
obtained
was assayed
NADP and glucose-6-P mitochondria
were
0 1976 by Academic Press, of reproduction in any form
Inc. reserved.
from
as described
dehydrogenase prepared
AND METHODS
according
commercial previously
concentrations to the method 592
sources (4)
were
given
except
doubled.
of Sottocasa
earlier that
the
Rat liver --et al.
(6).
Vol. 68, No. 2, 1976
Three
times
hexokinase
BIOCHEMICAL
washed
rat
(7) were
was purified
brain
were kinase
strength
particles
that
rat
enhanced
diluted
in place
mitochondria than
(but
by increasing
with
did
(see
liver
the
1.
not
bound
an appreciably
liver
mitochondria, ionic mitochondria),
temperature
l),
modification
to 25'.
excess
the conditions
modification:
a) hexo-
such that
exceed
0.005
mitochondria,
modifications
ionic
Fig.
(Fig.
M sucrose
These
liver
slight
of the enzyme with
the following
by increasing not with
for
hexokinase
3).
noted
0.25
solubilized Rat brain
except Fig.
medium did of rat
0'.
(4)
where
(5) with
to inhibition
particles
described.
by incubation
Except
incubation
than
activity
susceptible brain
used
rather
brain
hexokinase
were in the
were
was at 25'
sites.
previously
preparations
ionic
procedure
was assayed
binding
as described
and glucose-6-P
as previously
column
ability
mitochondrial
(5)
to Chou and Wilson
in the DEAE-cellulose Binding
particles
obtained
according
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
resulted greater
the
M, b) rat incubation
from
observations
proportion
(see Fig.
binding Binding
brain
and c)
and the binding strength
total
of the was less 1);
with
was also assays
were
done
strength
Inhibition of Binding by Increasing Ionic Strength. Binding ability of glucose-6-P solubilized hexokinase was assayed as described previously (5), using rat liver mitochondria. The indicated salt concentrations were added to the tubes before initiating binding with MgC12. Open symbols (o,A) represent KC1 and closed symbols (.,A) potassium phosphate (pH 7.0).
593
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 68, No. 2, 1976
in polypropylene been
dipped
microcentrifuge
in 2% bovine
boo ; coating
with
the hexokinase
AND BIOPHYSICAL
tubes
serum
(Brinkmann
albumin
BSA was found
(BSA)
to prevent
to polypropylene
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Instruments)
solution
then
artifacts
(unpublished
which dried
had
at approx.
due to adsorption
of
observation).
RESULTS From Fig.
1, it
MgC12 - induced mitochondria, assay
the first
bound
(Fig.
time
that
In this binding
When the conditions Chou and Wilson KCl,
elution
conditions,
other
at about
Fig.
2.
(4)
patterns
these
low ionic
for
are
occurs
(see Methods),
purified
hexokinase
were
severely
more than
inhibits
hexokinase used
for
at 0.02-0.03
assay
it
the
to liver the binding
M ionic
strength.
has been possible
can bind
to rat
50% of the
to
brain
enzyme was
present.
modified
such as those
g KCl,
routinely
DEAE-cellulose
slightly
two peaks 0.075
been
experiment
sites
strength
solubilized
inhibition
binding
2).
when excess
that
of glucose-6-P
percent
a modified
particles
clear
have previously
Fifty
Using show for
binding which
(5).
is
column by using
shown in
of hexokinase, have been
Fig.
chromatography a shallower 3 are
one at about
reproducibly
used by gradient
obtained. 0.065
resolved
MKCl (eight
Under and the experiments).
Binding of Pure Hexokinase. Hexokinase (0.065 units, purified according to Chou and Wilson (4)) was incubated with brain particles as described in Methods. Total volume was 0.25 ml.
594
of
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 68, No. 2, 1976
The relative about
3 also
at least
indicates
partly
lower
salt
refer
to these
preliminary
two forms nonbindable. analytical
in
the
the two peaks
reasons
that
bindable
concentrations
and Type In for with
of activity
75%:25% to 25%:75%; Fig.
is
amounts
AND BIOPHYSICAL
this
particles,
completely
have,
remain
the enzyme eluted
to brain is
for
while
of the
focusing
under
varied
KC1 concentrations
hexokinase
eluted reason
the bindable
eluted experiments,
from
investigation.
For this
of the enzyme as Type I b for
isoelectric
however,
at higher
nonbindable.
The asymmetry
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
peaks,
at we
enzyme, together
suggest
2C
-0
10
-C
5.c
-C
25
m -C
that
VI cE 3
--
--
Frachon
Fig.
3.
number
DEAE-Cellulose Column Chromatography of Rat Brain Hexokinase. Chromatography was performed as previously described (4) except In the upper elution that shallower salt gradients were used. pattern a 600 ml linear gradient from 0.0 to 0.20 g KC1 in column buffer was used, collecting The lower elution 3.8 ml fractions. pattern was done exactly the same except the gradient went from 0.0 to 0.15 g KCl. The KC1 concentration (0) was determined by conductivity measurements on the fractions. Hexokinase activity (0) and percent bound (A) were measured as described in the Methods section. In both experiments bindable enzyme was found only in the high salt peak (0.075 g KCl). The proportion of the enzyme in the second peak which could be bound was, however, found to vary in different experiments e.g. in the lower profile, only 35% of the activity in the second peak was bindable, whereas in the experiment shown in the upper profile, 70% was bindable.
595
Vol. 68, No. 2, 1976
BIOCHEMICAL
Type I,, and Type I b are Variation
total). also
suggests
in
turn
AND BIOPHYSICAL
composed
in the percentage
that
some of these
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
of more subforms
bindability
subforms
(at
least
of Type Ib (see
six
Fig.
3)
are nonbindable.
DISCUSSION It
had been
solubilization ionic
association
actually
of the it
little
enzyme with that
incorrect.
investigation)
which
for
have,
in assays
(1,
ionic
reasons
of binding
rebinding
here
(5),
Using
this
appropriate
modifications
of the binding
demonstrate
that
brain
Furthermore, cellulose
the mitochondrial
membrane,
ion
investigation.
remains
under
Type Ib)
serves
probable
that
form produced
as the
the physical
starting
point
in variable
(see Fig.
contain
observations)
amounts detectable or lipid
(5),
596
Two major
ability
so the
I
of
forms, and Ib are
n
to interact basis
for
enzyme
3) during (10,
to
DEAE-
the demonstration
with
this
distinct-
(presumably it
to some extent,
carbohydrate
used
possible
described
the purification,
at least
mitochondria
to mitochondria.
mitochondrial for
less
and making
Although
their
remain
is
has now been
or chemical
Since
which
been routinely
of the enzyme.
in
was
by liver
previously
resolved.
have
presumption
reasons
has permitted
difference
obser-
mitochondria
can bind
Type In represents,
enzyme does not unpublished
(4)
heterogeneity
by the
this
of the previously
procedure
of this
enzyme to
binding
it
of
of the
(for
is
assay,
Type In and Type Ib have been distinguished
the strength
new information,
hexokinase
modification
undetected
designated readily
slight
chromatography
a previously
than
low
would
by brain
effect
of practicality
purified
that
cause
strengths
show that
found
could
In contrast,
In view
ionic
of hexokinase
strength
8, 9).
(8).
to moderate
presented
strength
enhance
the membrane
ability.
ionic
to slightly
low
binding
to the
hexokinase
we have also
Furthermore,
susceptible
high
on the MgC12-induced
The results
mitochondria.
that
appeared
was presumed
or no effect
under
observed
of mitochondrial
strengths
vation,
previously
all
seems quite
an artifactual
purification.
The
and J. E. Wilson
difference
between
Iband
In
Vol. 68, No. 2, 1976
is
not
likely
to be due to such
purification
in that acid
(by the dansylation
by SDS-gel
principle
difference net
greater
Partial
between
charge,
with for
might
include
Ib is
a phosphorylated
dephosphorylated
(and
'
proteolysis
than
of binding
less
molecular
weight
suggest
that
affecting
charged
on its
is
In.
(enzymatically?)
negative)
seems
in N-terminal
results
and dephosphorylated is
but
in a modification
more negatively
form which thus
The latter
during
out,
to differ
or apparent
Ib and In lies
DEAE-cellulose)
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
ruled
found
technique)
Ib being
phosphorylated
loss
been
electrophoresis).
affinity
resulting
factors.
Ib and In have not
(98,000
their
AND BIOPHYSICAL
of the enzyme has not been entirely
unlikely amino
BIOCHEMICAL
In during
(based
the
Such modification forms
e.g.
perhaps
converted purification
to the with
ability. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Financial
support
from the National
for
Institutes
this
work
was provided
by Grant
NS-09910
of Health.
REFERENCES 1.
2.
Rose, I. A., andwarms, Craven, P. A., Goldblatt,
3.
Kropp,
J. V. B. (1967) J. BioZ. Chem., 242, 1635-1645. P. J., and Basford, R. E. (1969) Bzochemistry,
8, 3525-3532. E. S.,
and Wilson,
J. E.
(1970)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Cownun.,
38, 74-79.
4. 5. 6.
Chou, A. C. and Wilson, J. E. (1972) Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 151, 48-55. Wilson, J. E. (1973) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 154, 332-340. Sottocasa, G. L., Kuylenstierna, B., Ernster, L., and Bergstrand, A. J. (1967) J. Cell. Biok 32, 415-438. J. E. (1973) Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 2, 543-549. 7. Wilson, 8. Wilson, J. E. (1968) J. BioZ. Chem., 243, 3640-3647. 9. Teichgraber, P., and Biesold, D. (1968) J. Neurochem. I&, 979-989. 10. Craven, P. A., and Basford, R. E. (1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 338, 619-631.
1
These results are consistent with earlier studies using the enzyme These prepared according to the original Chou and Wilson (4) procedure. the present observations, enzyme preparations probably were, in vimof mixture of I and I but were found to be homogeneous with regard to molecular we!?ght (en;., SDS-gels or centrifugal methods).
597