Vol.
95, No.
August
3, 1980
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
Pages 1080-1089
14, 1980
PURIFICATION
OF
RAT HEART CYCLIC NUCLEOTIDE OF IMMOBILIZED PHENYLBUTENOLiDE Annie
Laboratoire des Sciences
Received
F.
Prigent,
G.
Nemoz
de
Chimie Biologique, Appliquees de Lyon, 69621 Vi I leurbanne
PHOSPHODIESTERASE INHIBITOR and
H.
ON COLUMN
Pacheco
B$t 406, lnstitut 20 Avenue Albert Cedex - France.
National Einstein,
June 19,198O
SUMMARY : Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase was purified over 200-fold in a single step from the rat heart cytosolic fraction, using affinity chromatography on phenylbutenolide inhibitor immobilized to AH Sepharose; After elimination of the contaminating proteins by washing with the loading buffer and ther with 0.4 M KCI buffer, without any loss in enzymatic activity, the cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase was eluted in good /isIds with a linear KCI gradient from 0.4 M to 1.8 M. Enzymatic activity determination performed with both cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP as substrate, either at low (0.25 PM) or at high (25 pM) concentration, pointed out the presence of several phosphodiesterase forms with different substrate specificities, in the elution prof i les.
INTRODUCTION
: Since
chromatography macromolecules dy
employed
rases
from
several
to
a solid
linked tion
in
: dyes, proteins
cyclic
nucleotide
not
terases Abbreviations phenvlacetic
been
and
specially
the
purification
do,
used
and
been blue c-like
but
also
et
the
reported (2)
protein
doxantrazole
enzymes
which
bind
for
various
other
proteins
: phenylbutenolide acid
acetic
related
(41
or
O,~c,,
of
been
Blue
of
Iigands,
which
purifica-
dyes
to
bind
alrea-
phosphodieste-
types
(3),
calcium
(CDR) papaverine
(5,6,7), and
dextran-Sepharose
nucleotides,
:
various
has
calmodulin
related (9).
acid
affinity
phosphodiesterases
and
cyclic
the
nucleotide Three
inhibitors
or
(11,
technique
cyclic
origins.
F3GA
al
purification
affinity of
species
have
Cibacron
(8)
for
This
phosphodiesterases
retains
Cuatrecasas
procedure
troponin
xanthine only
of
enzymes.
matrix, as
work
extensively
tissular
as
methylisobutyl gel
early
has
such
binding
the
as linear
phosphodiesnucleotides
(Z-oxo,2,5-dihydro,4-furyl)4-
-COOH
A-H-Sepharose 48 : aminohexyl Sepharose 48 ; EDC, HCI : I-ethyl-3-(-3-dimethylamino-propyl)carbodiimide, HCI ; DMF : N-N dimethylformamide ; Tris Tr i s (hydroxymethy I )-ami nomethan ; DTE : (erythro-2,3-dihydroxy)-1,4-butan dithiol ; EGTA : ethylene glycol 2 (2-aminoethyl) tetracetic acid ; CAMP 3’5’cyclic monophosadenosine 3’5’ cyclic monophosphate ; cGMP : guanosine dependent regulator (calmodulin) phate ; CDR : calcium 0006-291X/80/151080-10$01.00/0 Copyrtghi 1~‘ I980 b.v Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
1080
: :
Vol.
95, No.
such
BIOCHEMICAL
3, 1980
as
ATP,
Sepharose
NAD
not
several
other are
on
of
The
only
a minor
only
phosphodiesterases of
columns
of
step
but
and
heart.
4-fold)
with
lung
a 40% (9)
in
cyclic
nucleotide
active
drugs.
bution
of
and
of
conjugate in
cyclic
to
highly
use
purify, nucleotide
via
amide
a single
phosphodiesterases
total
from
guinea
(ll-12), for
several
cardio-
eventual
contri-
of
various
all from
backbone
Among
described
acetic
the
moderate
(151, could
carboxylic be
easly
This
report
acid
- AH Sepharose
the rat
pig
heart
a phenylbutenolide
they
to
various
effect
linkage.
step,
Iigand,
the
the
since
a phenylbutenolide
using
13
as
target
enzyme.
Iigands
(8)
eventual
inotropic
cardiac
al
authors
previously
potential
in
the
with
on
on
independent)
of
several
the
the few
purification
investigate
to
of
nucleotide
other low
a possible
affinity
Only
et
analog
further
EGTA.
chromatography
cyclic
follow
by
inhibitors
of
of the
cardenolides,
Sepharose and
to the
out
effects
convenient
tocu-aminoalkyl
sent
to
selective
proved
preparation
is
forms.
purification
is
aims
related
their
phenylbutenolide
48
pointed
this forms
affinity
yielded
not
retained by
phosphodiesterase
Mohindru
dependent,
phospho-
released
that
independent
forms
CDRalso
specifically and
noteworthy
reported.
did
that
CDR-dependent
by
inhibition
derivatives
the
was
our
competitive
linked
it
showed
Cat’
a do xantrazole
phosphodiesterase One
the
only
but
Iarly, but
a 20-40-fold is
the
excellent
activity
compounds
(13-14),
CDR
With an
phosphodiesterase
synthetic
and
Simi
proteins
gives
two
technique
(10)
of
of purify
COMMUNICATIONS
effecters.
al
It
were
recovery.
As
ly
isolated
obtained
presence.
the
purification
this
phosphodiesterase
forms
not
Ca++
Wrigglesworth
of
(4,101.
MIX-agarose
However
et
presence
usual
inhibitors
phosphodiesterases(one
or
RESEARCH
phosphodiesterases
Klee
purification
does
immobilized
bovine
the
phosphodiesterases
STMP-agarose
substrates
component
recovery
the
BIOPHYSICAL
nucleotide
in
a 40%
allows
as
proteins.
affinity with
attempts
A, cyclic
CDR-Sepharose
CDR-Sepharose
purification technique
coenzyme retains
CDR-dependent
diesterases a column
or
only
AND
multiple heart
describes
forms
pre-
cytosolic
fraction.
MATERIALS A&D METHODS : A-H Sepharose 46 was obtained from Pharmacia Fine Chemicals. EDC-HCI, snake venom (Ophiophagus hannah), unlabelled cyclic nucleotides were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. AG 1 x 2 resin i200-400 mesh) was from Bio-Rad Laboratories. [3H] CAMP (20-30 Ci/mmol), [3H] cGMP [3H] guanosine (5-15 Ci/mmol) (10-X) Ci/mmolI, [3~] adenosine (20-25 Ci/mmol<, were supplied by the Radiochemical Centre Amersham. N-N dimethylformamide acetic acid, EGTA were obtained from Carlo Erba-Milano. All other chemicals were reagent grade. Preparation of cyfosolic rat heart phosphodiesterases prior to chromatogram. Hearts from Sprague Dawley rats (250 g) were rapidly removed and perfused with 0.32 M saccharose in Tris-HCI buffer 1 mM (pH 7.4) to remove blood. The fresh muscle was homogenized with a glass-glass potter in 3 v/w of the
1081
Vol.
95. No.
3, 1980
above-mentioned buffer. min.. The supernatant supernatant fraction terases.
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
The homogenate was centrifuged was then centrifuged at 105,000 was stored at -2O’C and used as
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
at 20,000 g for 1 h. a source of
g for 15 The 105,OOOg phosphodies-
Preparation of a phenylbutenolide acetic acid substituted gel. A-H Sepharose 46 (5 g) washed following the manufacturer’s instruction s, was suspended in 20 ml of deionized water ,500 mg (2 mM) of phenylbutenolide acetic acid (2-0~0, 2,5-dihydro,4-furylj-4 phenyl acetic acid) Ueredissolved in 100 ml N.N-dimethylformamide and added to the A-H Sepharose 48 suspension. EDC-HCI (3 g) in 30 ml of deionized water was added dropwise. The pH was brought to 4.5 with dilute hydrochlorid acid and the reaction allowed to proceed for 48h at room temperature with ContinuoUSgentle mecanical stirring. pH was frequently readjusted to 4.5 during the first 24 h. A further overnight incubation in presence of 2 mM acetic acid was performed in order to block any remaining activated groups. The resulting substituted gel was washed with a N.N-dimethylformamide-water (2:l) mixture (1.5 I) to remove unreacted Iigand, (the disappearance of unbound phenylbutenolide acetic acid in the wash was monitored by determination of absorbance at 280 nm.), with 500 ml 1 M K HP04, 500 ml of deionized water and finally with 500 ml of storage buffer 7 50 mM Tris, 5 mM MgCl 0,l mM DTE pH 7.4). It was suspended in Tris buffer as a 2 : 1 slurry an 5’ stored at 4’ until1 use. In order to perform several control experiments, acetic acid - substituted gel was alternatively prepared following an identical procedure. In this case the coupling reaction was allowed to proceed overnight. The concentration of phenylbutenolide acetic acid attached to the gel was estimated to be 19 pmoles/g dried resin when determined from the ultraviolet spectrum of the conjugate measured as a suspension in polyethylenglycol and 21 pmoles/g/dried resin when determined from the ultraviolet spectrum of the hydrolysate (6N HCI hydrolysis at 120’ for 2 h.).
Chromatography procedure. Chromatography was performed as indicated in legends of fiqures 1 and 2. Gradient elution was followed by extensive washes of the column with 2 M KCI in Tris buffer. This procedure allows a good regeneration of the affinity column which can be reused at least three times with reproducible cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase elution patterns and constant recovery.
3’5r-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase assay. CAMP and cGMP phosphodiesterase activities were assayed according to the method of Thompson and Appleman (16) as modified by Boudreau and Drummond (17). Percentages of adenosine and guanosine fixed on the resin were evaluated with tritiated nucleosides, and the phosphodiesterase activities corrected for these yields. No more than 15% of Assays were performed on an al iquot of substrate was hydrolyzed in an assay. each eluted fraction. On account of sample dilution, KCI concentration did not KCI, up to 0.5 M was shown to norsignifiexceed 0.45 M in the assay mixture. catively affect CAMP phosphodiesterase activity of the original cytosolic preparation when measured with both 0.25 pM and 25 pM substrate concentration ; cGMP phosphodiesterase sensitivity to KCI dependedon assay conditions : whereas it was only slightly inhibited (20% with 0.5 M KCI) when assayed at 25 pM cGMP concentration or at 0.25 FM cGMP in presence of calcium + calmoduIin, basal activity measured at 0.25 FM cGMP in presence of EGTA was decreased about 20% with 0.25 M KCI and 50% with 0.5 M KCI. Percent inhibition were determined up to 0.5 M KCI and basa I cGMP phosphodiesterase recovery was A boiled 105,000 g supernatant of rat cerebral corrected for these values. cortex was used as calmodulin source (18).
1082
Vol.
95,
3, 1980
No.
: Cyclic
RESULTS
tion
BIOCHEMICAL
was
nucleotide
entirely
teins
acetic
(50-60%
activity
was
Cyclic
eluted
kCI
(Fig.1).
by
with
vered
activity 6.6
M.
inhibitor
fore
recovered
0.6
was Cyclic
0.45
the
the
wash
fold
active
nucleotide Sepharose
in
and
the
same
in
to
fractions
of The
a narrow
range
this
10% only assay
KCI was
no
enzyme
of
the
conditions
activity
in
85%)
of
more
not
0.45
tightly
the
bound
detected
reco0.3 to
in
were
shown).
The
M
a 75%
from
activity
(data
and column
at
resulted
was
recovered
pro-
(Fig.1
concentration
activity
the
acid-Sepharose of
(about
of
to
contaminating
buffer
peak
majority
and
frac-
phosphodiesterase
acetic peak
phosphodiesterase since
of
loading
the
a single
purification.
eluted
M KCI
as
cytosolic gel
bulk
the
COMMUNICATIONS
heart
detectable
with
bound
gradient
rat
substituted The
without
first
RESEARCH
the
acid gel.
material)
KCI the
of
acetic
phosphodiesterase
a lo-15
M KCI
to
substituted
in
a linear
coupled
before
both acid
applied
Pooling
yield
te
the
nucleotide
was
to
of
BIOPHYSICAL
phosphodiesterase
bound
phenylbutenolide
AND
eluted
the
the
eluabe-
whole
,l
KCI --- (M) -0.5
-0
I
1
I
30
60
Column
effluent
I
90
(ml)
FIGURE 1 : Chromatography using the acetic acid-AH Sepharose 46 conjugate. Theacetic acid-substituted gel was packed into a 1.0 x 2.0 cm column, washed and equilibrated with 50 mM Tris buffer containing 5 mM MgCl 0.1 mM CITE, 0. 1 mM CaCl ,pH 7.5.Enzyme samples (0.5 ml) containing 5.7 il proteins were applied to ? he column. After sample application, the column was washed with 36 ml of Tris buffer. 6 ml fractions were collected. The column was then eluted with a linear O-l M KCI gradient in Tris buffer (30-30 ml) at a flow rate of 25-30 ml/hour. 3 ml fractions were collected. CAMP phosphodiesterase activity (-) was determined in each eluted fraction on 100 pl aliquot using 2.5 pM CAMP as substrate. Assays were performed in triplicate as described in MATERIAL5 AND METHODS. Absorbance c------j of effluent fractions was monitored at 280 nm. Proteins were also determined according to Lowry et al. (25) using bovine serum albumin as standard.
1083
2)
Vol.
95, No.
BIOCHEMICAL
3, 1980
co
---
,(W) 0
AND
ml 0
m
a _..._..._...------,.::...............,...,..
1084
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
Vol.
95. No.
3. 1980
cyclic
BIOCHEMICAL
nucleotide
coupled
ved
phosphodiesterase
Sepharose
column
with
column
0.4
prior
amount
material)
devoid
absorbing
material
was
was
generally
it
techniques
(for
dependent
upon
tration
FM)
peaks
2A).
In
vity
rat of
most
concentration lapping at
peaks
about
1.5 45%
with
level
(25
FM)
elution 2C and peaks fractions
FM)
were
eluted
The
CAMP which Cyclic
with
the from
was
these
activity
and
a 44%
ZOO-fold
and
150-fold
the with
totai
bulk
recovery
cGMP
very
1.15
M KCI
and
peaks
recovery purification
in
At
from
at
about
gave
a 68%
cGMP
phosphodiesterase respectively
recovery
(table low
Two
a minor
high
showed
acti-
at
phosphodiesterase
0.25
peak
appeared
activity
was
(Table
the
same
pM profiles
and in
over-
substrate
emerged 0.9
cGMP
broad
practically
the
activity
AMP
M (Fig.
purification
and
importance
1.5
assayed (Fig.26).
different
well
cyclic
about
ZOO-fold
1).
two
concen-
phosphodiesterase
M KCI
(Table
CAMP
recovered
0.8
cGMP
low into
at
cAMP
than
hydrolyzing
relative two
of
phosphodiesferase
proved
the
peak
as 1.5
two M KCI.
(Fig. large Pooled
CAMP
phosphodiesterase
activity
with
more
1).
FIGURE 2 : Chromatography using the phenylbutenolide acetic acid-AH-Sepharose 48 conjugate. The phenylbutenolide acetic acid-substituted gel was packed into a 1.0 x 3.0 cm column, washed and equi Iibrated with the same Tris buffer as described in the legend to Figure 1. The 105,000 g supernatant of the rat heart phosphodiesterase preparation (1.5 ml , 7 - 16 mg proteins) was applied to the column. The column was washed with 42 ml of Tris buffer followed by 48 ml of 0.4 M KC1 in Tris buffer (as indicated by arrows). 6 ml fractions were collected. After th,ese two washes, the column was eluted with a linear KCI gradient from 0.4 to 1.8 M (84-84 ml) at a flow rate of 25-30 ml/ hour. 3 ml fractions were collected. Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase activity (++) was measured at the following substrate concentrations : panel A, 0.25 FM CAMP ; panel 5, 0.25 pM cGMP ; panel C, 25 FM CAMP ; panel D, 25 pM cGMP. In panel B, (-) activity was determined in presence of 0.1 mM CaCl plus calmodulin in a saturating amount (40 pg protein/assay) ; (O-*..o) acti? vity was determined in presence of 1 mM EGTA. All assays were performed in triplicate on 100 ~1 of each eluted fraction. Absorbance c------l was measured at 280 nm. In order to avoid large losses in enzyme activity which occurred upon storage at -20°C, the purified fractions were stored at +4OC in presence of bovine serum albumin (1 mq/ml). Before BSA addition, aliquots of each fraction were taken up for protein determination.
1085
nm
M KCI.
strikingly
at
from
in
280 1.8
separation
resolved
of
remo-
applied
to
were
activity
purification
the
0.4
measured
(65%
more
0.925
nucleotide same
profiles
a minor
affinity
still
detectable
from
was peak
the
of
no
inhibitor
phosphodiesterases
When
M and
eluted at
and
Then, profiles
phosphodiesterase
a 150-fold
pattern 20).
0.7
yield
cGMP
(0.25
M.
about
67%
of
(lo-20%
elution
: a major at conditions,
in
part
elution,
phosphodiesterase
activity
recovered
The
heart
substrate
Washing
other
enzyme
the
(Fig.2).
conditions.
activity)
these
was
1).
191,
substrate
from
gradient
elution with
COMMUNICATIONS
KCI proteins
the
observed see
eluted
activity.
in
RESEARCH
M KCI
linear
contaminating
found
review
phosphodiesterase
the
phosphodiesterase
assay
(0.25
separated
of
was
0.5-1.8
to
of
BIOPHYSICAL
activity
between
M KCI,
a substantial
As
AND
than
Vol.
95, No.
3, 1980
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
1086
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
Vol.
95, No.
The to
original
phosphodiesterase
exogenous
yed. At
In 25
ca lmodul
contrast,
were
by
the
eluted
0.25
45%
as
reported
purification
of
enzyme
The cGMP
no
to
whole
major
45%
form
decreases
activity. ratio
only
profi
les
determined
some
similitude
from
rat
from
human
heart
and
platelet,
cedure.
More
purified
to characterization
fraction
is
previously KCI
concentration
low
substrate
during
the
the
eluted
cGMP
well
from
4))
25
PM substrate D
with
III
the
DEAE
a high
a parent
affinity
form by higher
concentration.
will of
the
others than
obtained
be
needed
high
affinity
(20,21,24). 0.8 The
at
M hydrolyzed first
part
1087
et
AMP GMP cyclic
substrate
This
form and
presents Terasaki
and as
Asano
(20) pro-
if
cyclic
AMP
The
active
fractions
our
cyclic from
was
Further
specify
separation 0.7
M KCI
phosphodiesterase eluted nucleotides
0.8
(24)
separation
phosphodiesterase (21).
AMPlevel
phosphodiesterase
to
both
proteo-
cyclic
low
Hidaka
al
eluted
that
cGMP
Appleman
AMP
Thompson
that Es-
M KCl),more
and
by
presumed
Cyclic
before
chromatography
cyclic
by
be
substantial
(0.7
by
with
phosphodies-
can
occurred.
CAMP
described form
2-5-fold
attests
no
importance both
ce I I u lose
homogeneity
that-
by
procedure.
concentration.
form
it
CAMP
given
nucleotide ,
peak
major of
F III
us i ng
(20-211,
column
eluted
of
a shoulder
s-tudies
described
and
as
respec-
phosphodiesterase
and
yields
for
that
chromatographic
affinity
first
good
150-fold
than
cyclic
(22-23)) the
and
condition
recovered
step
phosphodiesterases,
cellulose
lost
acid-
one with
better
in
substrate
The
the
recently, apparent
DEAE
far
importan-
1).
a rapid
ZOO-fold
yields
was
about
at with
with
eluted
appears
cGMP
with of
acetic
for
than
calcium-dependence
phosphodiesterase (A/G
and
each
are
Table
phenylbutenolide
is
considers
of
was
FM),
CAMP
inhibiof
range
phosphodiesterase,
(more
CAMP
was
sensitivity
same
lB,
PM,
investigated
the
(Fig.
in
inhibition
phosphodiesterase
specific
one
in
acti-
0.25
the
emplo-
conditions.
hydrolysis
only
be
assay
; at
cGMP
procedure
for
lo-40-fold
If
forms
(which
to
respectively) :
calcium-dependent
and
and
obtained
EGTA
10.25
nucleotide
phosphodiesterase
therefore
on
cyclic
cGMP
1mM EGTA
insensible
condition on
results,
chromatography
obtained
enzymatic
was
nearly
dependent
by
above
shown
a convenient
(68%
(20).
pecially,
was
is
purification
activity
the
be
COMMUNlCATiONS
substrate
while
chromatography
procedures
lysis
to
20%)
to
every
and
shown)
RESEARCH
found
was
CAMP
EGTA
and
here
filtration
terase
of
phosphodiesterases
classical gel
account
affinity
recovery
tively). and
not
prior
: The
Sepharose
EGTA
(about (data
substrate,
observed
DISCUSSION
in
On
in
to
phosphodiesterase
that
adjunction
inhibited
1).
BIOPHYSICAL
was
both
unmodified
(Table
FM cGMP as
+ Ca
concentration
was
ted
2+
sensitivity
slightly
hydrolysis
AND
preparation
in
its
FM substrate
vities
ce
BIOCHEMICAL
3, 1980
to
1.05
at at M hydro-
Vol.
95, No.
lyzed
3, 1980
as
much
ferentially
CAMP
might
form
cGMP
last
represent
trate
level
activity)
the
P II
(50
and
60%
form
the
D II
reported the
by
affinity
gel”
from
its
assume
arms
of
acid
on
non
bring
REFERENCES
2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
Terasaki
be
subs-
compared
(24)
and
achieved Iity
by
to
the
that
accounted
al I,
part
caused
by
a smal
either
stronger
the
the
mock very
different being
less So,
hydrophobic I part
in
cyclic
of of
the the
we
spacer our
chroma-
nucleotides
phenylbutenolide
nature
a
chromato-
results).
with
than
separation
of
phosphodiesterase
proved
in
for
bioelution,
from
use
(phosphodiesterase
related
on
activity
acid-Sepharose,“a at
gel
a better
may
However,
acetic
I igand
informations allow
high
acetic
enzyme-support multiple
forms
with
purification.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. This Sante et de la Recherche and by the Centre National
1.
on
inhibitors
might
was
possibi
adsorption
of
specific
both.
phosphodiesterase
nonbiospecific.
gel,as
only
Attemps
or
phosphodiesterase
the
recognizable
I Sepharose
further and
out
biospecific
a cGMP
at
fraction and
gel
been
or
(20).
inhibitor-coupled
phenylbutenolide
will
have
AcOH-Sepharose
that
interactions higher
may
to
procedure.
with
Asano
phosphodiesterase no
ami nohexy
tographic
Appleman
pre-
phosphodiesterase
peak,
recovered This
nucleotide
rule
carrying
bound
could
gel of
behaviour
strongly
cGMP
by
and
enzyme
M zone
important
nucleotides.
cyclic
we can’t
the
behavior
and
of
specific
particularly
COMMUNICATIONS
1.05-1.4
bulk
of
CAMP
acetic-acid-Sepharose
to
graphic
CAMP
the
This form
eluted
RESEARCH
while
= 0.5).
described
of
buffer”,
adsorption
the
Hidaka
elution
1)
a CAMP-cGMP
cyclic
form
phenylbutenolide
“deforming
ratio
peak
of
BIOPHYSICAL
about
previously
both
CAMP-cGMP
Since
(A/G
phosphodiesterase
hydrolyzed
the
AND
ratio
either
by
eluted
(A/G
cGMP
contaminated
The
or
as
hydrolyzed
activity
to
BIOCHEMICAL
work was Medicale de la
supported (INSERM, Recherche
by the lnstitut National de la FRA no5 and grant 77.4.096.3) Scientifique (CNRS, ERA no 560).
:
Cuatrecasas, P., Wilchek, M. and Anfinsen, C.B. (1968) Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci. USA, 61, 636-643 . Morrill, M.E., Thompson, S.T. and Stellwagen, E. (1979) J.Biol.Chem., 254, 437 l-4374 . Ash-ton, A.R. and Polya, G.M. (1978) Biochem.J., 175, 501-506. Watterson, D.M. and Vanaman, T.C. (1976) Biochem.Biophys.Res.Commun., 73, 40-46 Miyake, M., Daly, J.W. and Creveling, C.R. (1977) Arch.Biochem.Biophys., 181, 39-45 Klee, C.B., Crouch, T.H. and Krinks, M.H. (1979) Biochemistry, 18, 722-729 Kincaid, R.L. and Vaughan, M. (1979) Proc.Natl .Acad.Sci .USA, 76, 4903-4907 Mohindru, A., Chenet, A. and Rhoads, A.R. (1978) Biochemistry, 17, 32973304 ’ Wrigglesworth, R. (1977) FEBS Letters, 80, 141-144 Klee, C.B. and Krinks, M.H. (1978) Biochemistry, 17, 120-126 .
1088
. .
Vol.
95, No.
11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.
17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24.
25.
3, 1980
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
Amer, M.S. and Kreighbaum, W.E. (1975) J.Pharm.Sci., 64, l-37 . Weiss, B. and Hait, W.N. (1977) Ann.Rev.Pharmacol.Toxicol., 17, 441-477 . Nemoz, G., Prigent, A.F. and Pacheco, H. (1977) Biochem.Pharmacol., 27, 2769-2774 . Prigent, A.F., Nemoz, G., Roche, M. and Pacheco, H. (1979) Arch.lnt.Pharmacodyn., 241, 131-152 . Duperray, B., Nemoz, G., Prigent, A.F. and Pacheco, H. (1980) Biochem.Phar29, 115-118. macol., Thompson, Y.J., Brooker, G. and Appleman, M.M. (1974) in Methods in Enzymology (Hardman, J.G. and O’Malley, B.W.Eds) pp 205-212, Academic Press, New York . Boudreau, R.J. and Drummond, G.J. (1975) Analyt.Biochem., 63, 388-399 . Egrie, J.C., Campbell, J.A., Flangas, A.L. and Siegel, F.L. (1977) J.Neu28, 1207-1213 . rochem., Thompson, W.J., Terasaki, W.L., Epstein, P.M. and Strada, S.J . ( 1979) Adv. Cyclic Nucleotide Res., 10, 69-92 . Hidaka, H. and Asano, T. (1976) Biochem.Biophys.Acta, 429, 485-497. Thompson, W.J., Epstein, P.M. and Strada, S.J. (1979) Biochemistry, 18, 5228-5237. Sakai, T., Yamanaka, H., Tanaka, R., Makino, H. and Kasai, H. (1977) Biochem.Biophys.Acta, 483, 121-134 . Epstein, P.M., Pledger, W.J., Gardner, E.A., Stancel, G.M., Thompson, W.J. ( 1978) Biochem. Bi ophys.Acta, 527, 442-455 e and Strada, S.J. W.L. (1975) Adv.Cyclic Nucleotide Res., 5, Appleman, M.M. and Terasaki, 153-162 . Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L. and Randall, R.J. (1951) J.Biol. Chem., 249, 4943 .
1089