Qualitative Characterization of Sediment from the Smolnik Creek Influenced by Acid Mine Drainage

Qualitative Characterization of Sediment from the Smolnik Creek Influenced by Acid Mine Drainage

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Engineering 42 (2012) 1654 – 1661           ...

528KB Sizes 0 Downloads 57 Views

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

Procedia Engineering 42 (2012) 1654 – 1661

           !"  #$"% % & %&'(%)

*%    '   ! + + % ),     -.    /& ! '+ &- %)                                

 "         "-0                        )          ,  ! +(%)  1 "-0      2    %)  )  ! +3  %     ,      %  ", %  ,),1  %   2 1%   % "-0&     4567& 8#

67

 9%56 9: 56;  " 6<  &      ! ++ 2    %=%  >(8 , ! ++   %     +    % ),"-02     ),82(  >(0  &

? %)), @! %  ), !   A%  ! " #"   91,,1,% 9 9 

/   %2BC76##6D 7<9 1BC76##6D5555 5 $ "" 

B   )   E%++



1877-7058 © 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.545

M. Balintova et al. / Procedia Engineering 42 (2012) 1654 – 1661

   "    )     6     ,  ),%  &&  , +  &  %  9%   ) & ,  %   (%            %%   =%     %  , % &      , 2! +   %&8&" &"%6       17 %,$$  2 6,  ,    ,    %    2! +   ,  $$ $$7- D  , %=%  )  )     "   "-0 %    )%     %  &% ,8!  ,   8!  '),   6 %  %   FG- FG  8!1'8 %    &)%  )1  88  H1   88%)) 6 %   I    8!  2 0  F5G   ,   =%%8     1 , 1,   !%  1,    ,%   1,         %  %  %  ,  ,F7G@ ) ,1  )     I , ,    %)5&     ,   %) 5 7&  ,)  #  )9  ) )% %   #;%1  F#G

      3         8 %2  %  ! ++%    ),    %! +   &6 ) 6         %  76

%  &#   2%"-0   ! +   %)5

8 @  ! ++  ! +(%)    

1655

1656

M. Balintova et al. / Procedia Engineering 42 (2012) 1654 – 1661

2    ,                 ),  %%    =%  - 22@ (2H@ 0H %   ,   '),""!!""6 5 &J  &!   + ! ++   8  2  &  ' )  D5  , '), >(8 %   % % ( 2     ) 5),1 #      %   -6 3  % &- 2   )%),>6 ,% ,2       ),% ! 2(H*"+&K ,8  6, %,&  %%% 7

6D

6" 826(!&.(LA (H2! 2, %%    .%+0 .%+">!& K) &K , . 6.   ,  %  2 62 &% #7 D M%AO    &  P  AQ                    5  +J      " %   !        &  )%#%& '  #RS  #2>(0  %  0  J"20008   ) 0008( 

$ %'    

    

2 % "-0  5 %  =% , ! ++   7 #  2 )2%    %   ( %  K  ! +(%)PD$  %  =%       .  % 2 )              %  =% , ! ++    %  1         %       ( %       K        ! + (%)PD$  8  ,&   2 )& "-01   %   ""-0% %   ! ++&     8&- &"&%&:  1& 2 )(%  , ! ++  

1657

M. Balintova et al. / Procedia Engineering 42 (2012) 1654 – 1661 



-

8

-

"

%

:

6

F @G

F @G

F @G

F @G

F @G

FW @G

FW @G



D$

7

5$7

 5;

 #

V  

5

7

V

V 5

V#



D<

5;

75D

5#

 D#

 $



<

V

V 5

V#

5

5$<

#

D#

5

#;

<#5

<

<$$D

D

<;

#

7

#

;5

7#

$;

;$

55

D7

D##

V

$

V#

#

#D

;$



;

#D

5#



7$

V



V#

@

D6;#







5







5

#



! 

"



FW @G

)

FW @G

FW @G

8 , T=% , ! ++2 )   %  "-0 %   ,     9   %  %  ), "-0! !  % !7 !#& )      

2 )2%  , % >(8 !H76



-

8

-

"

!

%

:

"



)

FUG

FUG

FUG

FUG

FUG

FUG

FUG

F + G

F + G

F + G

F + G

F + G

!

 <

5D

;

7$



; ;

$D#

7;

<$

#

V #

75

!



5

<$

#;5

 ;

D<<

$#

7D<

<5

;

V #

7<

!5

 $



77

55

 

5<

#7

<#D

;

$<#

V #

 ;

!7

5D

<

;

#7

 D

D#7

<7;

5D5

$

$

V #



!#

5

5

<$

#<5

 <

D<

 #7

7<

7

$5

V #

<

P

1658

M. Balintova et al. / Procedia Engineering 42 (2012) 1654 – 1661

2  % !5   FDG ), ) &H 6 )   5

 6 8 "    )  %   H  1 D57 6  )  7&  5;6       5!H7%    %   )  )  1) !H 7 821 ,%  H  %),!H 7   %  %      1    ),       +      %% %  %    %)=%  , (  %% %% !H 7 %)   $; D 6  )   !H7  7!H7&,J)   <#5 77 6  )%86H9&     ) % )    1,,1%% ,% =% ")  ) % ;

 ;; 6        H    H F(0  "-0! + 82(    '  ! !7  %.         2 )    %F$G(%8 5 )      %    % =% '$;&;#&<#5&D$#&#; 6&)%,1 5D

65D# 69D# 6  &2 !7  )  ,1    % ),      %   % ),"-0 

8 82(% !5

M. Balintova et al. / Procedia Engineering 42 (2012) 1654 – 1661

8 582(% ! !7

2>(0   !&!5&!7    8 72 ! !7            B*=% '!H  08  <#;5&- %-& A"D#8 5#-  " <!55H H <;8 08  <5$;#<&   -)& - &8 D !&"7H  H ; 08

 $ < 2    =% 'D)  +   DD5RS

8 7>(0   !&!5&!7 % B*=% '9-%-& 9  -)& 

1659

1660

M. Balintova et al. / Procedia Engineering 42 (2012) 1654 – 1661

2% !5    ,   &    , +   +    +=% '"  %F G&"-0         % ,& &I  8   +,, '&,  ,  %  &,   % 0% +,  ,&  , ,),>6 , ,  >(0FG&  >(0   !5X%), )  >(0&-Y) %6    ,   '  %%)

   

2     =% ,   %   ),  "-0      %   %  >(8&  82(    >(0    %    % &  ,,1&%   ,      %  ,"-0 ! +2  &  ,=% '&  ,1, %       ! ++),82(  %   %    ! ++    )% & %    %)  %% "-0 %  %1         )   %  =% ,   =% ,    2+ ) %),! +(  0 "  ,%   P "JJ6 #6  ),! +K "  ,! K P ;;

M. Balintova et al. / Procedia Engineering 42 (2012) 1654 – 1661

  FG[]]"&: X&A%_ ]-K        ! `+! +  %) B%(&8 %8&%34 5  1# 3  %    &  B-3"&

<&7D<65< FG  - H& P  0A&  X!& -  "@ "=%%  , 1   ), 1,   ),     6   4 $;<99#D6< F5G 2A@&0  3"%)       )% %    455 % 7 $#59B##6; F7G .    X--%   -   ,        ),   1      %b     4" 6 $$<9 B$56# F#G.  X-&! L& )K %         ) %        455 6$$D9B;7#6$ FDG .  &X-&  @&-%  ! &   1,,1,% ,c &8  &    %  % $$79!BD76; F
9B;<6$ F;G  ]  :&  A%+  0&  "d]  -  -   )'     "-0            )      % & %    9B5756< F$GK%% @&> ) @&% %:&: 8   %), % %    9  %  $$;9!B 6 F G@  ]&H&$$DB-   ,86    ! + ! + 6  5  $$D9B#6D5 FG.  &X-$$7B-   ,),%1   B.3 X )&X@ B 2     ,%  6 -  "  &3 & 565

1661