Nuclear Physics A508 (1990)239&246c North-Holland
QUARK
MODEL
OF
THE
239~
NN
Yu.S.Kalashnikova,
FORCE
AND
TRITON
I.M.Narodetskii,
Institute for Theoretical 117259, the USSR
and
V.P.Yurov
Experimental
Physics,
Moscow,
We review recent results on the threeand four-nucleon binding energies and the spectral functions for the twoand three-body obtained within the Quark Compound Bag model taking breakup properly into account the admixture of the six-quark bags in the few-nucleon wave function.
1.
INTRODUCTION The
quark
following
effects
three
inclusion
The
i)
in
of
important
consequences
structure
functions1'2.
constituent effect
quark
on
3He
statistic
can
be
separated
at
at
least
into
the
show
that
quark also
effects
extremely
a to
factors
sizeable
sensitive
fraction
the
in
the
details
naive
of due
the to
requirement
forces
to
elastic
the
effects
The
three-body
has
and
using
coherent
levela.
to
antisymmetrization
form
calculations
attributed
the leads
quark
nuclear
Recent
be
antisymmetry
full
the for
model
may
are
nuclei
categories:
of triton
of
EMC
Fermi quark
4
. Both
quark-quark
interaction; ii)
Effects
of
alternatively iii)
described
A
complete
considered The some
as
selection
topic
has
discussion. 5
been
on
the
the
point
energies
NN
what
the
The
the
which
can
nucleon-nucleon
shall
of
consider
not
be
correlation;
few-nucleon
we
literature. 2,4
shall
main
momentum
In
this
result
the In
systems
Quark
on
here
distributions
0375-9474/ 90 / $3.500 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland)
will
it
the and
we be are
to
which
are
since
the
from
Bag
momentum
(QCB)
briefly that
consistent
present
theoretical
nucleon
shall
simply
our
recent
Compound
connection
influenced
particular,
energies
the
be
subjects
, we omit
concentrate
binding within
will
with
reviewed
and4He
interaction. ii).
we
in
derived
and
range
calculation
orthogonal
recently
3H
distributions
short
states
ones.
remain
Instead,
results
for
of
to discussed
i)
as
confining
microscopic
multiquark
extent
currently
multiquark
the with
model' discuss binding the
QCB
240~
Yu.S. Kakzshnikovaet al. I Quark model of the NN force
picture
which,
definite
improvement
2.
concerning
THE QCB MODEL The QCB
the
most
triton
role hadron
counterpart
of
that
multiquark
interaction.
the
NN
non-local
parameters
are
determined
parameters
quark
meson-meson, case
could
models.
The
in
theoretical The
employed
written
QCB
that
states
model,
the
be
incorporates play
the
in
short
scattering
calculated
already
and
were
predictions
from
has
meson-baryon
the QCB parameters
this
principle
model
provides
the
range
V is given by fr,r';2), QCB potential which contains
interaction,
and
model
confined
In
energy-dependent which
energy,
NN force models.
SYSTEMS
is a semiphenomenological
short-range
These
binding
of "realistic"
FOR FEW-NUCLEON
model
important
the
over
few
data,
in
microscopic
been
tested 7 channels ,
baryon-baryon
found
the
to be in good agreement
for
some
in
which
with
the
of the MIT bag model'.
potentials
in the momentum
have
representation _ ..,
the 9
most
simple
form
when
f,(k)f,(k’) j,(k,k';z)
= c,
cl"(Z)
l
v
(1)
ext(k,k')
where f,,(k) = t-c,+ xw(zw-
(2b)"'
ka/mN)
} sin
(kb)/k
(2)
(s2-k2ba) and 2 vv(z)
(1 - xi)
=
For
ease
of
(s - z,) + x:
presentation,
2
scv= =+ mb N for es.(l)
(3)
(Z"_ Zc"), write
we
uncoupled
and channels, but in some actual calculations the mixing of the 3S1 3 In eqs.(l)-(3) z is the energy D1 pn channels has been included. parameter, momenta, that
mN
is
nucleon
radius
mass,
of the
k
and
potential
k'
are
in the
the
off-shelf
coordinate
space
coincides
method
of
long-range
with the equivalent bag radius used in the P-matrix 10 is the Fourier transform of the ref. , and V ext(k,k') part
of
most
economically
to6
for
the
parameters that
the
b is the
in
discussion ens.(l)-(3)
zy is expressed
is also
traced
back
of the NN content two-level
QCB
the
in
and
in terms
terms the
of
meson
physical
with
exchange.
meaning
bibliography.
of the bag mass
to the P-matrix
interaction
of
further
in the six-quark
The
V ext(r)e(r-b),
interaction
described
approach
and
We
is
refer
the
Recall
QCB only
E, by zv= E,- 2mN and while
z2+ m,
xv 6
is a measure
we consider
the
cl-t m provided
the
bag. As in ref.
x2=0
of
latter
Yu.S. Kalashnibva
ratio
c
=
is
mFlcl
drop
below
the
what
follows
index
we
held
V
adopt
=
that
will
be
used
respectively. preserve at
even
with
c and
zo' has
seven
the
We
(4)
use
we
the
in
with
the
(b,
use
of
sign
effective
6
the
is
operators
the
with
the
with
k
and
p
three-nucleon an
In argued
this 12
for
way
no
that
the
additional
For
U =
the
case
with
the
12,
that
As
long
31,
23 are
of
force
going
from
has
(6)
been
in
the
verified
by
cluster
multiquark It
forces the
integral
standard
arises.
QCB
the
momenta
the as
the
expressed
- p')
relative
considered
however, since
(5)
Va
and
help
difference
directly L of Vo
terms
N = 3 this
pair-wise
when
to
properties.
essential
be
for
eqs.(l)-(3)
problem,
in
1 one
that
practical
is
Jacobi
particle
modification
that
(b,
.j f
equivalent
- 3p2/4mN)6(p
usual
modified
Note
little
operator
trinucleons
three
Tjktl).
few-nucleon
may
S = V(k,k';z
calculation
applied
is
NN
parameters 1 =
phase
all,
uncoupled
with
off-shell
Sq-bags)
&I&,
the
system.
explicit
methods
being
of
energy
V(k,k';p,p';z)
QCB
stress
is
interaction
Hot
kernels
four
to
which
Hamiltonian
q
the
channels
order
system there _ V. For the
kinetic
Thus
to
at
energy-independent.
or
In
sufficient
and
different
contribution II
Ho
.
be
interaction
made
in
modified
to
QCB
the
NN
is
we
zl.
channels,
x~,~
has
V
the 11
NN
c~+~,
but
few-nucleon
(neglecting
where
_
coupled
(1)
potential
NN
of
the
zc,
zo=
(4)
and
by
coupled
QCB
the
use
described the
notation
constraints
shown
of
the
x = x1 and
1
were
energies
expression
the
ref.
additional 2 + x.)+1= J-1 the uncoupled
are for
modified
deal
between
j
the
also
the
introduced as
=
simplify ci,
x?
large
while
=
the
properties
parameters
choice
define
1
Sj)
c
constraints
causality
asymptotically
channels
letting
1 or
for
These
the
To
constant.
1
also
xj=
241~
et al. I Quark model of the NN force
systems'.
has
do
not
three-
to
been
also
require
any
four-nucleon
system.
so, the
within
six-quark
specific in
the
standard
freedom.
systems
One
in
QCR
method
confined
form
complexity
the
of
the
states
finds the
the
QCB
it
NN
twofold.
encouraging under can
be
of
using to
only
realize
on
it
that
the
effects defines
can
nucleon
that,
consideration, treated
the
First,
interaction
technique
problem method
manifestation
is
short-range
few-nucleon
of
the
be
same
the
treated
degrees
despite the
of
of
of the
few-nucleon footing
as
in
242c
Yu.S. Kalashnikova et al. I Quark model of the NN force
the
ordinary
the
six-quark
way
to
bag
account
similar
to
deuteron
3.
potential
problem.
admixture
for
that
Secondly,
in
the
presence
shows
a
of
systematic
the
quark corrections to trinucleon observables 13 ref. fu;, the six-quark corrections to the
of
RESULTS discussing
summarize the
in
can
be
binding quite
some
central
seen
from
energies
Gedn,
dimensionless value
fm
Faddeev
GA,,
the
three-
BT a
4a 2
Gtdn
four-body
fm
0.28
fm
6.35
fm
1.29
is
not
long-range found bt=
in 6.7
within
of
GeV-' 6.0-7.5
parameters data
the
meson 6 ref. .
are
corresponding
The
while
The
S(3Di) the
model"
is
vertex
commonly used 14 . The quoted
that
somewhat
NN
the
QCB
lower
obtained the
by
results
potentials.
1 for
central
interactions
MeV
29.0*
G2 atp
fm
5.5
G:dd
fm
8.6
S,-3D,
QCB
potentials,
of
the of
the of
Ei and
of
the
the
triplet
quality and
of
is
shown
SP-86 Paris
fit in
several
was
potential to
the
Figs.1.
phase-shift potential
the
including
interactions
potential
singlet the
for
out
carried
parameters
VPI-SW
predictions
Co
"realistic"
were
radius The
.
included
and
the
1.744
the
Co=
B,
radius
GeV-I.
S(3S,), from
'So
tail.
to
use of 11,12
nuclear
1.785t0.015 15 and cross-section
3
combinations
Co=
QCB
the
we
experimental
toy
constants
to
calculations
realistic
more
related
value
results
8.48
correction
of
the mixing
the
values
the D(D,P)~H 16 for various
MeV
Coulomb
The
and
between "the
closely
corresponds
with S-D
within
normalization
Table Some
obtained
agreement
also
calculations
neglecting
calculated
"experimental"
calculations
nucleon
results
Table,
quote
of
three
interactions
those
G2 and atp asymptotic
extrapolation
of
few-body QCB
We
G2 1.29 tdn= the newest
than
realistic
the
and
impressive.
constants
the
the
Table
simplified
As
*
explicit
properties.
Before
2
the
trinucleons
may
be
fixed
to
was
varied
phase
shift
Experimental analyses. model
are
The also
243~
Yu.S. Kalashnikova et al. I Quark model of the NN force
4
80
single energy
b
_
RCB
--
Paris
-
I
I
I
I
j
I
I
600
400
200
TL(MeV)
-Ltu
800
600
400
200
TL
‘y ( MeV)
(Me@
Figs.1 The
shown. T lab? The
QCS
300
MeV
the
given QCB
values
the
B,=
8.02,
of
8.10
leads
due
'So
expected analogous can
of
x
of
8.1
the
MeV
pattern
data
with
the
for
corresponding
models.
MeV,
the is
basis
not
of
very
sensitive
interaction.
=
6.1,
independence
6.7
of
BT
the
One
and on
7.3
the
reduction 11 .Found
modify
the for
S'
inclusion
5 channel a
number of
and
of
BTby
D-wave
of of
result of
BT
relative
underbinding
contribution
The
increase
mixed
in
the only
the
0.3
components
NN
NN
slightly. NN
MeV.
The of
the
the triton
kernels
higher
"realistic" 5
to
to
GeV-I,
radius
of
5
obtains
=
neglected
for
similar.
probability
between
on
bs
the
practically
D-state
singlet
for
considerable
3S,-3Di.
an S,
8.14
in
predicted BT=
bs
coincide the
interaction
considered
results
expect
principle
a
to
and to
Bonn
of
description
1 agrees with the previous findings 11 interactions . The inclusion of the tensor
force
partially than
to
descriprion energies
lies
4.9%,
energy
with
QCB
central
and
and The
central
force of
PD=
radius
potential
better
smaller
calculations, the
respectively. QCB
the
binding
Faddeev
choice
the
deuteron parameters 6 . In particular,
Paris
triton
the
the
ref.
interaction,
channel
the
for
the
in
for
The
gives
while
of
values
those
force
Judging
case is
is from
interactions
three-body
QCB
others
kernels
weights
of for
one of
the wave
244c
Xu.S. Kalashnikova et al. I Quark model of the NN force
function triton that
are D-wave
results
91.7,
1.0
probability from
and
7,3
%,
3/2 T = 0 pairs
calculations
binding for
energy the
Note
satisfies 19 in the triton .
Table The triton
respectively.
approximately
(in MeV) QCD
the
that "3/2
the rule"
2 for 5, 18 and 34 channel
interaction
and
other
Faddeev
"realistic"
potentials Number
of
5
QCB5
8.1
RSC'?
SSC17
v1417
Paris16
7.02
7.46
7.44
7.30 7.38
18
7.23
7.49
7.57
34
7.35
7.53
7.67
As an additional Fig.2
the
two-body
test
of the trinucleon
breakup
amplitudes
wave along
A Jansetal, kin1 ---
Fig.2
A ~archaRd etal QCB RSC
function with
we show the
in
recent
24%
Yu.S. Kalashnikova et al. I Quark model of the NN force
functions those
.
data20s21
3He(e,e'p)
can
be
3
three-body k*a/mN
of
3He(p,pn)
of
pp
the
and
those
extracted
3He(p,pp)
reactions
Paris
theoretical
and
calculated
protons
and
and
the
A
experimental theoretical
which
the
in
over
PWIA
to
models.
neutrons
systems
in
similar
the
distributions
pn 22
very
and
also
the
are
the
energy almost
agree
analysis
the
of
.
CONCLUSIONS Our
is
and
Reid the
spectral
theoretical
interaction
have
--tppn
residual
with
perfectly
4.
We
He
breakup
QCB
between
observed.
distributions
momentum
the
"realistic"
agreement
satisfactory
using
results
to
from
derived
results
E,=
The
corresponding
primary
observation
introduced,
trinucleon
of
function
agrees
reaction
at
Clearly, better,
many
the
model
main
simple
and
QCB
by
of
the
potential
here
need
to
the
is
that
short-range
NN
low-energy
in
theoretical
analysis
at
the
of
improvement
nucleon-spectator
succeeds
universal
an
the
description
conclusion the
QCB
description
while from
already
quantitatively
reproduces revealed
of
the
realistic
provides
energy
momenta
a
reasonable model
determined
to
aspects
The
a
that
up
however,
a
QCB
binding
with
when
that,
to
The
3H
the
least
calculation. provides
leads
it
properties.
prediction
is
wave
of
(e,e'p)
600
MeV/c.
be
understood
first
level
the
of
QCB
model
interaction
that
observables
trinucleon
experiment.
REFERENCES 1)
V.V.Burov
et
V.V.Burov,
al.,
Z.Phys.
V.K.Lukyanov,
2)
P.J.Mulders,
Few-Body
3)
P.Hoodbhoy,
R.L.Jaffe,
4)
K.Maltman,
5)
in
Yu.A.Simonov,
I.L.Grach, (1987)
Notes
149. Z.Phys.
Suppl.2
Phys.Rev. in
A318
(1987)
D35
(1987)
Physics
260
I.M.Narodetskii,
Rome
591;
Proceedings
preprint
Phys.Lett.
Yu.S.Kalashnikova 7)
(1982)
(1984)
318.
256. 113.
(1986)
412.
V.P.Yurov,
Yad.Fiz.
49
632;
I.M.Narodetskii, 6)
Systems,
Lecture
Yu.S.Kalashnikova, (1989)
A306
A.I.Titov,
et
107B
al.,
Z.Phys. the
rd
88/10. 1;
155B(1985)
217.
I.M.Narodetskii,
C38 3
(1981)
Phys,Lett.
Yu.S.Kalashnikova,
of
INFN-ISS
(1988)
Workshop
427; on
Nucl.Phys. I.M.Narodetskii,
Perspectives
in
A469 in Nuclear
246~
Yu.S. Kaiashnikovaet al. I Quark modei of the NN force
Physics and
at
Intermediate
M.M.Giannini
Energies,
eds.,
(WorId
S.Boffi,
C.Ciofi
Scientific,
degli
Singapore,
Atti 1988),
p.285. 8)
for Lond.
9)
Bikkerstaff
the
review
See
A309
(1983)
611.
I.M.Narodetskii,
R.P.,
Yu.S.Kalashnikova,
Phil.Trans.Roy.Soc.,
Few-Body
Systems
4
4 (1988)
211.
(1988)
205. lO)R.L.Jaffe,
F.E.Low,
ll)I.M.Narodetskii,
Phys.Rev.
I.L.Grach,
lZ)A.G.Baryshnikov
et al., Yad.Fiz.
13)Yu.S.Kalashnikova, (1986)
(1979)
2105.
Systems
48 (1988)
I.M.Narodetskii,
1273.
A.I.VeseIov,
Z.Phys.
A323
205.
14)M.P.Locher, 15)I,Borbely,
T.Mizutani,
Leningrad, lG)J.L.Friar 17)C.R.Chen
Phys.Rep.
A.M.Muchamedzhanov,in
Nucl.Spectroscopy
and
1984,
et al.,
43.
of the 34
Nucl.Structure,
Phys.Rev.
C37
Phys.Rev.
P.U.Sauer,
lQ)J.L.Friar
et al.,
et al.,
46 (1978) Proc.
th
C31
(1988) (1985)
Nucl.Phys.
Phys.Lett.
Nucl.Phys.
et al.,
22)A.V.Blinov
et al., Nucl.Phys.
2859. 2266.
(1981)
161 (1985)
A475
21)C.Marchand
A369
(1987)
Phys.Rev.Lett. A469
Conference
Alma-Ata,Apr.l7-20,
p.413.
et al.,
18)C.Hajduk.
2O)E.Jans
D19
Few-Body
321.
241.
687.
60 (1988) (1987)
1703.
556.
on
1984,