CHEST VOLUME
I NUMBER
71
5 I
Radiation-Induced
Coronary
in
Artery
clinical
formed
in
and
the
has shown that the mals can be damaged radiation.’ prior
jury
to cardiac
to
of
exudative of the has
The
appearing of radiotherapy. a benign
#{243}onstriction.LS high
rabbit.3 the
In
the
capillary
it has
lesion
is mediated cells,
microcirculation
a large
group
been
patients
California
(San
Francisco)
has
sion is clearly dose-dependent of tolerance to radiation can cardium.’ of
the
It is expected heart
pericarditis
of
Ordinarily,
in
therapy.L4.S
In
with
printed) disease six
died
and 1)
Hodgkin’s with
an
extensive
that
(in been with
dissevere myo-
.
as this, one connection
atherosclerosis
very
is tempted between
ionizing
this First,
in general.
to establish radiation is not apone should is capable
Several
expert-
monkeys, dogs, rats, mice, birds, etc) performed precisely to prove such a varying degrees of success;6 for instance,
of
Study
of
radio-
Hodgkin’s disease the University of shown
that
the
le-
a large field
of
volume radiation,
in 16 fractions in an incidence
over of
5 percent.’
hearts
being artery
injury
muscle.3
severe
radiation-induced
disease show no more atherosclerosis pected for the corresponding age.4 least ten reports have been published more are coronary
ments have point,
have
underwent
when the
of 4,000 rads will result
about
of
he
and that the limits be defined for the peri-
that,
is included
the administration a four-week period
for at
treatment later,
radiation
to prove
These coronary
in compromise
who
therapy of the mediastinum at Stanford University and
for
be
able
ar-
dispropor-
vessels.
factors
But
of causing
pa-
that
through
resulting
other
and coronary artery disease. propriate scientific methodology.
white
established
or
the re-
lesions
the
(Fig
In cases such cause-and-effect
risk
young
coronary
as family history, hypertenetc. A dramatic example was boy who received 4,000 rads
months
infarct
of
whom
a
volume fibrosis.
Zealand
for
those
the
individuals
of cardiac
of
a
of the
atherosclerosis
cardial
or pen-
to a large myocardial
mantle
coronary
is
in some
New
rabbit,
endothelial
within
tamponade
the
me-
usually
addition,
in
lungs, lesion
myocardial
reproduced
myocardial
of the
and
the
to
Sixteen
in
many
by
the
range
unexpected
condition lacked
in-
ease.
are
old)
totally
artery disease, such sion, hyperlipidemia, that of a 14-year-old
radio-
Although
doses of radiation may develop diffuse
pericardilal well
In
often
common
course,
to cardiac
to the
patients
cases
years
was
tionate
of
to the
of
most
initiation
ceiving of the Both
a limit
disease
per-
believed
35
of ages is frequently
the
atherosclerosis
other
to
1970s
other mamdoses of ioniz-
was
pericarditis have
early
possibility
neoplasms
breast.
cardial
been
and
the
imposes
progressed
heart
the
what
studies,
tissues
of cases
lesion
to
those
and
work
and
heart of man by therapeutic
malignant
diastinum,
majority
1960s
Contrary
many
year
experimental
late
The (15
terial
within
spontaneous
observed.
Disease Extensive
developed
which
tients
therapy
1977
atherosclerosis
EDITORIALS
ing
MAY,
of
describing seemingly these
FIGURE
than that exSince 1957, at (and three 16 patients related to
individuals,
1.
Transverse
section
of left
anterior
coronary
artery
boy who died with large, acute, anteroseptal myocardial infarct. Sixteen months earlier, he had received 4,000 rads to mantle for Hodgkin’s disease. Notice marked eccentric myointimal proliferation (and atheromatosis) which at this point has reduced lumen to less than one-fourth of its expected diameter (hematoxylin-eosm, original magnification from
with radio-
coronary
X
563
15-year-old
27).
coronary
atherosclerosis
coronary
arterial
bits receiving to the heart lipids
sclerosis,
of
produced
type
human
rabbits
seen
in
did
by
man, the
ated
human seems There
not
has
not
other
resulting of tumors of these
mentally
of the
patients there
been of
and
sclerosis.
expression is
United States, radiation-induced very
that
individuals diet and
and
that
rich
but
coronary
it may lipids
in
the
and
be
at risk. Therefore, radiotherapy alone may
be
other
pressed in areas subjected cal injury, such as irradiation.
when
planning
but not
the
relationship
tion
is still
questionable;
of coronary and
ship
exists,
the
of
appears
to be
overall
incidence
in patients disease
low.
was
reduced
a dose
neoplasm
of 3,000
of the In
to
the
by shielding rads;9 however,
otherwise possibility
the
EDITORIALS
majority
would
kill
of producing of
cases,
the
5
the
radiation-induced
in
Pathology
with
the
ir-
comM.D.#{176} Calif
University
School
Department,
LF,
VA
beof the
Gold
Lee
Cancer GD, of
the
development
Res
4:325-334,
Conomy
JP,
consequences
Dose
and
Am treat-
effusion
asso-
Hodgkin’s
disease.
KE:
Arch CL,
of radiation-induced
29:244-257,
Cohn
1973
Morphology
Pathol
Roberts
of
radia-
86:512-519, WC:
irradiation
1968
Coronary
for
heart
Hodgkin’s
disease.
1976 A:
Rupture
36:904-913,
synergism
a
Invest
JR.
60:39-45,
LF,
for
Pathogenesis
mediastinal
Med
et al:
North
pericardial
disease.
RA,
7 Amromin
8
JR: Lab
heart after
J,
disease:
Clin
1975
Stewart
McReynolds
heart Radiol
technique
Stewart
LF,
Fajardo
aspects.
K, Ruckdeschel
fibrosis.
Fajardo
Radiation-induced
mantle
35:795-802,
J
LF:
radiation-related
Fajardo
tion.
apex not
thereby against
a lesion
factors
Cancer
Am 6
disease
patient,
1971 R, Brace
disease
Hodgkin’s
to the heart, of therapy
9:511-531, Byhardt
myocardial
relation-
cardiac one should
to is
F. Fajardo,
Dr. Fajardo, 94304
experimental
tion-induced
disease
for the
3 4
to radia-
heart
mantle
patients
microcirculation
Stanford
Fajardo
and
ciated
in
University
JR,
Clinical
ment
radiis that heart
coronary
At Stanford
a tumor adjacent a valuable form that
such
requests: Palo Alto
1 Stewart
ex-
if the
technique
REFERENCES
because
of radiation-induced
irradiated
fail to treat compromising
564
incidence very
Reprint Hospital,
of physi-
disease
even
the those
secondary
of Pathology,
addi-
radiotherapy artery
Professor
of Medicine.
athero-
coronary arterial disease be an important consideration of
the
Never-
Stanford, eAssociate
speculate sufficient
form
that benefit
Luis
one may are not
which,
feasible.
fibrosis
whom
portions of of disease,
promised.
2
a course
myocardial in
be
not
susvein results.
distal free
the
of irradi-
some
diffuse
will
was
satisfactory
to realize
probably
radiation
the
of
Now, should one try to prevent the possible ation-induced coronary disease? The answer one should try to prevent radiation-induced in general, should
with
number
factors
to
it is important
(see radia-
saphenous
the are
should
of
reported
associates in whom
by
with
bypass
type
case
disease
treated
bypass
artery
as if it were
Iqbal and a patient artery
was
artery
of bypass
neces-
predispose to is preferentially
effect
who
different be pos-
This
in the
cholesterol.
population
to the
surgically
exemplified
coronary
theless,
con-
for
disease
does
should be of coronary
is not it should
atherosclerosis.
been
and
coronary
experi-
that,
has
disease
what
hearts hearts,4
If the angiogram shows that the major coronary arteries
be ruled may
possible
in
in relation
there
how-
in whom both
the
coronary
tion-induced
the number of cases of possible coronary artery disease is appar-
or independently, and whose
disease particular
to approach
neck;8
radiation
it is
common
small
ated that
sible
pected
to the penpericardio-
artery
of the heart, the distribution
disease in irradiated that in nonirradiated
after
cannot
coronary
artery from
deficits, and
that
irradiation Since
in this issue of Chest by page 664). They describe
development of atherosclerosis severity of spontaneous athero-
a diet
a diet
event
approach
arteries.
individuals
of atherosclerosis,
have
tionally sclerosis
head
are
clinically,
Furthermore,
Such
in irradi-
coronary
is a suggestion,
to premature increase the
to
than
atherosclerosis
Therefore,
tribute or may
appear
in neurologic
spontaneous
out.8
the
develop after the treatment?
not deathero-
administration
should
arteries
most
(again)
heart.
re-
and confined treatable by
or pericardiectomy.
In
spontaneous
sometimes
ever,
cause
centesis
of
to occur, particularly in the carotid vesare reports of carotid artery narrow-
radiotherapy
after
heart disease will be mild cardium and, therefore,
in rab-
atherosclerosis did typical coronary
atherosclerosis
This sels.
ently
to
produced
alone.
Secondly,
sary
the
experimentally
radiation
full
If
diet, I know,
the
similar been
(2,500 rads in five fractions) with high concentrations
cholesterol.7
the abnormal As far as
ing,
has
radiation and a diet
and
ceive velop.
quite
disease
Gildenhom
major
HC,
x-irradiation of
of
vessels
after
radia-
1975 Solomon
and
coronary
RD,
et
cholesterol-fat
J
lesions.
artery
al:
feeding
The on
Atheroscier
1964 Kellermeyer of
RW:
therapeutic
Delayed
cerebrovascular
radiation.
Cancer
36:1702-
1708, 1975 9
Cannel
RC,
Kaplan
HS:
Mantle
irradiation
disease:
An
analysis
of
technique,
tumor
complications.
Cancer
37:2813-2825,
in
Hodgkin’s
irradiation
and
1976
CHEST, 71: 5, MAY, 1977