RANDOM QUADRATURE!3 OF IMPROVED ACCURACY* S.M. ERMAKOV (MOSCOW) (Received
29
June
1963)
Since a Monte-Carlo method is essentially statistical, the apparatus of mathematical statistics can be widely employed when such a method is used. Gn the other hand such a method possesses a number of specific features, due to the fact that we construct artificially a random magnitude, and the construction is not as a rule unique. These features bring a Monte Carlo method close to classical computational methods, and in particular, to the theory of mechanical quadratures. Several quadrature formulae with random base-points, which enable the error of a Monte Carlo method to be reduced in certain cases, are discussed in [l] L [3]. Interpolation-quadrature formulae with random basepoints are obtained in [4] under extremely general assumptions. The present article discusses quadrature formulae with random basepoints of improved accuracy, which are in a sense an analogue of Gaussian quadratures. The size of the error of the quadrature formulae obtained is estimated by evaluating the dispersion of the corresponding quadrature sum. 1. As in [4], we shall consider coefficient oj .of the function F: aj
=
the
problem
of
vych.
mat..
4, NO. 3.
(1)
Vj (Q) f (Q) dQ*
We shall assume that D is a region of k dimensions, summable in D and that the functions g+,, (m = 0. 1. normalized in D.
Zh.
the Fourier
s
D
l
evaluating
550-554. 213
1964.
that f is square . . . , N) are ortho-
S.M.
214
To evaluate
the
integral
(l),
Ernakov
we form the’ quadrature
Kn,jIfl= $ Ai (Qo~QI,...,Q,)f (QJ,
sum Kn, j [fl :
Qi~D.
(2)
i=o
We assume that
is accurate Qi are
the
for
situated
quadrature
the
formula
functions
randomly
q+,(Q)
in D with
(w = 0,
. . . . N),
1.
probability
density
that
the
Points
G(Qe,
Ql,.
. . ,Qnlr
and that M. o. K,,j
We represent
f(Q)
orthonormalized
by a Fourier
functions
[f] = aj.
series
including
qo,
(4)
in the ql,
complete
system
of
. . . . ‘pN:
f(Q) = i cr,cp,(QL m---o and we evaluate follows
from
where pl
111is
Al,,,
tained
in
of
coefficient
K,,j [cP,L
of
[cp,]
=
formulae
with <
of
the
It
random magnitudes
1~~1, u,,, = ~/ul;,,,j 1 held
for
111= sole
(-
i)j
smaller
1, are
Q,) can be uniquely imposed on the distribution
and the
~,,j[fI.
the
IT,,,]. The equations
quadrature
formulae
ob-
[4].
n < N and DK,, j [q,,,]
K,,j
random magnitude
correlation
a1 = I/o&j
AntO,,, . ..a tions
the
that
= 0 and DK,,j
The quadrature which
dispersion
and (5)
the
Kw,j 1~11 ’ and n = N,
the
(4)
(5)
dispersions,
obviously
*.
.T
‘Pj_1
(let lj TU (Qi)s imposed
i.e.
those
interest.
for
When n = N the
determined with relatively weak restricof the points Qi. In this case
det II f (Qi)v TO (Qi).
condition
of
on the
(Oil. 1
‘Ft.
‘~jsl
(Qi)t . .
’
1
CF,~(Qi)II’:
(Qi) !I:
coordinates
of
the
Q,
is
Random
When n < N, extra
are
imposed
on the such
Obviously. quadratures. tain
quadrature of
is
the
formulae
(“1
of
(p = 0,
1,
. . . , “1).
that
is
independent
D,
. . . . n2)
1 = n
obtain
E
(4).
/I2
of
quadrature
of
improved
accuracy
quadrature
formula.
Let D
fJ1 and D2,
(q
1,
= 0,
and let
Q,,,;
Q,,,
formulae
in D,,
of
is (6)
of
and ~“,,(I?
exact are
for
us define
= (XP, It
. . , np).
Y, and D2 independent
which
and numerator
ob-
interpolation-
the
XP E assumed here
is
X. Let 9’hc.Y) tp = 0.
1.
~‘~(.Y)~“U(Y) equal
n,
(h = 0.
. . . , n2)
are orthonormalized of base-points of
respectively
net
Yq).
in
= tt?\,,(Q).
the
on the net
when
to
the
corresponding
Arguments sults: 1)
to
formula
or net
+ 1) points
As = det, I/f (X,, i.e.
is
in D,. The products ~‘h(.Y)p”,, (Y) shown that, given the distribution
formula
denominator
of
of
it
a quadrature
be orthonormalized
orthonormalized n. It is easily quadrature
of
+ l)(np Yq
formulae.
some examples
regions
product
system
quadrature
than
formula,
Cartesian
form
in a sense an analogue of Gaussian it is much more difficult to case,
quadrature
as the
215
accuracv
random base-points.
example
iterative
the
us consider
with
be the
1,
are
improved
the
region
Let
accuracy
of
classical
an arbitrary
The simplest
of
base-points
formulae.
improved 2.
constraints
As in the
them for
of
qundratures
if
x,,
similar
. . . . X”
Y,), ‘pi W,),
quadrature
to
1
those
are
sum
employed
distributed
. . ., V,,, t-l’,) II:‘.
z,,,,,
in
If1
[41
is
lead
in D, with
to
the
the
followina
prohahility
re-
density
216
S. M. Eraakov
1
[det(lv;(X,L * * *?vpc (x,)\pl’,
(nl + I)! and Yo,
Y1,
. . . ,
in
Y,,
D, with
the
probability
density
1
(nn + I)! Bidet(1‘PO”(Y,& . - *, ‘P*, (Y,) (pl? then
cp; (Xl
jlK,,,2ljl = \
M.O.
‘P;(Y)
f(X, Y), dXdY:
i>
5 dY[S
If1 = %$ (Q) dQ - i
ml,,&
2)
A=1 Da
-
dXf (Xv y)
(X)]a -
‘p;
01
5 ( dX [ \ dYf (X, Y) ‘P;0j2- [5P);(X) cp;; 0’) f (X,Y) dx fl]‘. p=1 DI
DI
LJ
If we had not assumed that the base-points of the which is exact for n,,(Q) lie on the net, we should virtue of Theorem 2 of [4], the folllowing expression of
the
corresponding
quadrature
sum K,,~,“?
It
is
easily
)i=oy=o
shown that.
whatever
:
1
5 [ 1 f (Q) cp; (S) cp; 0’) dQ
*KnI,n, If1 = 1 P (Q) dQ - 2 D
[fl
quadrature formula have obtained, by for the dispersion
* .
LJ
f may be
DK*,, ‘1? [i] >, DK n,, ?I?I/l. Naturally, quadrature other to
the
hand,
arrange the
net
as such
in the
3) The case formula,
of
are of the
a formula
arbitrary special
is
interest
there
of
and not
is are
it
achieved
exact
for
summable is
that
imposed kn such
to
it
form On the
is
better
them arbitrarily.
because
any functions
of
the of
fact
the
form
11 = I. . . . ,)I?,
functions.
when the
on the
pays
functions.
choose
, )II, and gl (A’) v;;(1). square
(7)
mean that
products
has been obtained,
is here
I r= 1, .
Suppose
not
for
on the net, formula
type
does
exact
dispersion
quadrature
where g and gl
ture
are
base-points
6 (k’) & (W.
constraints
obtained
which
as soon its
The reduction that
result
formulae
maximum number of
base-points
constraints,
i.e.
of the
the
quadra-
coordinates
Random
of
n base-points
base-point in the Qo,
be definite,
vector
arguments
density
is
also
Qi. in Qo,
the
of
the
symmetry
of
the
coordinates
of
a given
of
. . . , Q,).
which
. . . . 0,.
Hence
it
follows
if
the
in D.
that
the
quadrature
co-
formula
equation
111'(Qo,Q1,. ..,Qn)= \ f (Q) ‘Pj (Q) dQ. h
\ ~Qo ‘,,j
If1
Kn , j
217
accuracy
(7) are symmetrical assume that the proin fact depends only on
distributed
D
In view
in terms
Q1,
ordinates of Q0 are uniformly is accurate for constants. Thus we must satisfy
improved
say QO). The relations Thus it is natural to
function-G(Qo,
symmetric
M.O.
of
can be expressed
(to
bability
quadraturcs
relations
(7)
and the
function
G(Q,,,
. . ,Q,j,
we obtain
(--
I? (n
f
1)
s
det Ilq, (Q,,,), . . . , ‘~j-1 (Qm)* Pj+l (0,)
dQo f(Qo)
...l~‘n (Qrn)lI:
=
det Iho (Q,,,), ...,(P,, (Q,,,Il::
D
= \ ‘Pj (Q) f (Q) dQ.
b
we have
i.e.
almost
everywhere
G (Qor . . ., Q,) = The condition
for
(-I)jvj
symmetry
det
II(pO(0,).
the
of
G(Q,,
‘Pj (Ql+l)
(Pj-l(Qm)s(Pj+l (Qm)*~.~.~n(Qm)(I:
. . . , Q,)
1 --= n,
A ft1
‘41 Al is
(00) det ITJO(Q,),.. .,T,(Q,,,)IC
(n + 1) dct ll~~(Q,)~~..v
‘Pj ((21) -=
where
in D:
cofactor
of
. . . ,vn (Q,)
mean that the coefficients G (Qo, Q1, . . ., Q,,) E const..
the
II:.
element
also
gives
1, . . .( n -
o,(Ql)
of
us the
equations
1,
the
(8) determinant
When I = 0 and p0 = con&..
equations
(8)
of the quadrature formula are all equal and Zhen 1 # 0, the equation A, x qj (Q,) obviously
holds. The quadrature example
of
nomials of quadrature base-point) higher
than
formulae
formulae
of
this
obtained type
in
[I]
and [21 offer
which
are
exact
for
the first degree. The author has not succeeded formulae with a maximum number of constraints which would be exact for algebraic polynomials the
first.
an elementary
algebraic
poly-
in obtaining (with one free of degree
218
S.M. Eraokov
If D
Is
a unit
with one free formula which
and f is
a periodic function of period unity construction of a quadrature formula la possible, provided there is a determinate
hypercube
a trivial
in all it8 variables.
base-point Is exact for
periodic
functions.
Thus
the
quadrature
formula
f
(Xl, . . . , Xk) dXl*.-dXk
=: +
may be associated
with
the
s
f(X,,...,Xk)dX1...dXkz+;
f (‘1.i
i=i
where tl, . .. . & [O,
, . *l xk,i)
j (Xl,*,
formula
D
interval
; i=l
are random magnitudes
I].
Obviously.
+ El,
. . * t x,,<
+
E/J
uniformly dfstributed over the
the same inequality will hold for the re-
mainder of the random quadrature formula as for the remainder of the determinate formula. 4. of
Let
us
improved
f (Q)dQ =
quote
another
accuracy
for
example
k [f] = $
(f (x1,0, . . . ,x,,,)
the
unit
of
an elementary
hypercube,
quadrature
formula
namely
+ f (x1,1, . . . ,Kk,l) + f (xl,%..., x,,,)},
% where
(i = 1,2 ,..., k),
Xi,3 = vi-X&-X&
magnitude8 distributed
and
Xi,r,
Xi,0
are
XiTb+Xi~~ < 1, Xi.0
in the region
random
>, 0
With the
probability density
This
formula
is
accurate
dependent variablea. in all its variables. centre
of
gravity
of
the
six base-pclnlx which pendent variables. It
is
easily
f a8 a k-tuple evaluate
the
is
verified
a constant
and second
aerles
hypercube, accurate
also
for
the
s L,
in Lenendre ^ K [f].If
I3 “L,....,n¶, ml,..., mk
If
are we can easily
that mdo. i? [f] is
di8perBiOn
DR VI = f
fpr
It is obviously convenient Using base-point8 which
polynomials f is even in
pouers
of
the
in-
f
is an even function symmetrical about the obtain a formula with
first
j(Q) dQ.
powers
On
of
the
inde-
representing
and using (8). we can all its variables. we have
(i + 2 fJ (miL,:)!! i=l
) ,
mi>
2.
Random
This
quadrature
quadratures
formula
is
of
fairly
improved
simple
219
accuracy
and suitable
for
practical
com-
putations.
Translated
D.E.
by
Brown
REFERENCES 1.
Hammersly,
I.M.
antithetic
and Morton,
variates.
Proc.
K.W.,
A new Monte Carlo
Cambridge
PhiIos.
Sco.,
technique 52,
for
449-475,
1956.
2.
3.
Morton,
K. W. ,
for
evaluating
Bakhvalov.
A
generalization integrals.
N. S.,
WC;I/, Ser.
ApprOximate
matem.,
mekhan.,
of J.
the
Math.
antithetic Phys.,
evaluation astron.,
of fiz.,
variate
36,
No.
UIUitiplC!
khimii,
3,
technique 2R9-293.
1957.
integrah.
NO.
4.
Vesti.
3-18.
1959.
4.
Ermakov,
S.M.
Monte Carlo NO.
4.
Polynomial
and Zolotukhin,
V.G.,
method.
veroyatnostei
473-476.
1960
Teoriya
approximations i
cc
primeneniya,
and a 5.