Rapid evaluation of edible hemp oil quality using NMR and FT-IR spectroscopy

Rapid evaluation of edible hemp oil quality using NMR and FT-IR spectroscopy

Accepted Manuscript Rapid evaluation of edible hemp oil quality using NMR and FT-IR spectroscopy Paweł Siudem, Iwona Wawer, Katarzyna Paradowska PII: ...

3MB Sizes 0 Downloads 36 Views

Accepted Manuscript Rapid evaluation of edible hemp oil quality using NMR and FT-IR spectroscopy Paweł Siudem, Iwona Wawer, Katarzyna Paradowska PII:

S0022-2860(18)31141-4

DOI:

10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.09.057

Reference:

MOLSTR 25691

To appear in:

Journal of Molecular Structure

Received Date: 19 July 2018 Revised Date:

18 September 2018

Accepted Date: 21 September 2018

Please cite this article as: Paweł. Siudem, I. Wawer, K. Paradowska, Rapid evaluation of edible hemp oil quality using NMR and FT-IR spectroscopy, Journal of Molecular Structure (2018), doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.09.057. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

𝝎−𝟔 ≈𝟑 𝝎−𝟑

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Rapid evaluation of edible hemp oil quality using NMR and FT-IR spectroscopy

2

Paweł Siudem, Iwona Wawer, Katarzyna Paradowska*

3

Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1, PL-02097

4

Warsaw, Poland

5

Corresponding Author: Paradowska Katarzyna

6

*Corresponding Author's Institution: Medical University of Warsaw, Faculty of Pharmacy, Phone/Fax.: +48 22

7

5720 951,

8

Corresponding Author’s email: [email protected]

SC

9

RI PT

1

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

10

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abstract:

12

Since Cannabis species include psychoactive varieties containing high levels of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC),

13

psychotropic properties could be wrongly attributed to hemp-seed oil obtained from Cannabis sativa. Hemp oil

14

does not exert any psychotic effect; on the contrary, it may provide significant health benefits, because it has an

15

optimum proportion of ω-6 to ω-3 fatty acids (3:1). Six samples of cold pressed hemp-seed oils were studied by

16

nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). These methods

17

were applied to evaluate the ratio of ω-6 to ω-3 fatty acids and to control the quality of hemp oils. FT-IR method

18

allowed us to distinguish three oils with the highest level of γ-linolenic acid. Additionally, NMR spectroscopy

19

was applied to determine the ω-6 to ω-3 ratio. The outcomes of the NMR experiment are in agreement with GC

20

outcomes measures. The results indicate that NMR and FT-IR may be used in routine evaluation of hemp-seed

21

oil quality as a fast and reliable method of verification of ω-6 to ω-3 ratio and origin of the oil.

22

Key words: hemp-seed oil, fatty acids, NMR, GC, FT-IR

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

23

SC

RI PT

11

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 24

1.

25

Cannabis sativa is an annual plant belonging to the family of Cannabaceae. It has been used as a source of food,

26

medicines, oil and fiber since ancient times . Today Cannabis species are known primarily because they contain

27

a psychoactive compound THC. Two main varieties should be distinguished: the marijuana and industrial hemp.

28

The concentration of THC in the former type is between 1-20 %, whereas in the latter the concentration does not

29

exceed 0.2 % [1]. In many Western countries the cultivation of Cannabis indica became illegal in the 20th

30

century. Industrial hemp with a low THC content has no psychoactive effects. Nowadays both types of Cannabis

31

are topics of social discussion and the researchers’ attention: the marijuana-type because of its possible medical

32

use and industrial type as a source of oil and fiber.

33

Hemp-seed oil, the main food product obtained from hemp, is most frequently produced by cold pressing of

34

seeds. Hemp-seed oil exhibits health benefits due to its high content of essential fatty acids. It is composed in

35

approximately 80 % of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) [2], mainly of ω-6 linoleic acid (LA) and ω-3 alpha-

36

linolenic acid (ALA). The LA:ALA ratio is ca. 3:1, as it is recommended in healthy diet [2]. Hemp oil also

37

contains γ-linolenic acid (GLA) (which is found only in certain plant seed oils) at the levels of up to 5 % [3]. The

38

fat-soluble vitamins D and E are other important constituents of hemp-seed oil. Hence, hemp oil has an excellent

39

nutritional value and it seems that the high PUFA content and LA:ALA ratio are the main reasons for its health

40

benefits.

41

Gas chromatography (GC) is a routine method in fatty acids profiling [3]. Nevertheless, spectroscopic methods

42

may also be used in oil examinations. In the last years the role of NMR in the analysis of oils has increased. The

43

advantages of NMR over chromatographic methods are: short analysis time and small solvent volumes. Also, in

44

NMR no special sample preparation is required, the method is not destructive and permits fast quantitative

45

analysis of oils. The 1H NMR method is most commonly used in oil studies [4]. The method allows one to

46

determine the LA:ALA ratio which is crucial for hemp-seed oil health benefits. Popescu et al. described the

47

possibility of discrimination of vegetable oils using NMR [5].

48

Different fatty oils (305 samples) including pharmaceutical lipids were examined by both the classical and the

49

1

50

and oil matrix on line broadening and the chemical shift of the carboxyl group signal were discussed [6].

51

The automated analysis of the fatty acid composition was done by low-field ¹H NMR spectroscopy; this

52

technique is promising for high-throughput screening. To demonstrate the applicability of this method, the fatty

53

acid composition of extra virgin olive oils from various Spanish olive varieties was determined [7].

54

Variations in the LA:ALA ratio may be caused by differences in origin and composition of seeds or the presence

55

of adulteration like the addition of cheaper oils [8]. Standard, time consuming methods, like GC or high-

56

performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) may be replaced by the fast Fourier-transformed infrared

57

spectroscopy technique. The analysis of near infrared (NIR) spectrum (from about 700 nm to 2500 nm), which is

58

a “fingerprint” of the examined sample, permits good discrimination between oils. Spectroscopic methods NMR

59

and FT-IR have a potential in fast screening of hemp oil quality.

60

Quality control becomes especially important at the present time when hemp-seed oil is rediscovered and widely

61

used as part of the diet or a dietary supplement.

62

2.

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

Introduction

AC C

EP

H NMR method. Data obtained by the two methods were in good agreement. Furthermore, the effects of solvent

Material and methods:

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 63

2.1. Materials Six samples of hemp-seed oil (HO1, HO2, HO3, HO4, HO5 and HO6) were purchased on the Polish market

65

(two samples at the pharmacy, one sample at a health food store and three at a grocery store). The oils were

66

produced by cold pressing of hemp seeds, during the period of validity the oils were stored at a temperature of 2-

67

8 °C, according to manufacturer’s recommendations. Two samples of oil were manufactured in Poland, one

68

sample in the Czech Republic, one sample in Canada and one sample in New Zealand (Table 1).

69

Table 1. Description of tested hemp-seed oils (country of origin and plant species).

RI PT

64

70 71

2.2. Spectroscopic analysis

72

2.2.1.

NMR studies

For NMR studies, each sample was prepared by dissolving 200 µL of oil in 800 µL of CDCl3. The solvent was

74

purchased from ARMAR Chemicals. 1H spectra for CDCl3 solutions were recorded at 300 MHz, , on a Varian

75

VNMRS-300 spectrometer using standard Varian pulse program. 2.2.2.

FT-IR analysis

M AN U

76

SC

73

77

The FT-IR spectra were recorded from KBr pellets in the 400–4000 cm−1 range using a Spectrum 1000

78

spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Cambridge, UK) with spectral resolution of 4 cm−1 and 32 scans. They were

79

processed using GRAMS/AI 8.0 software (Thermo Scientific 2008).

80

2.2.3.

GC protocol

Fatty acids profile was analyzed by GC with a capillary column and flame-ionization detection. Three parallel

82

samples of 100 µL were trans-esterified. They were hydrolyzed without prior lipid extraction by heating with 2.5

83

mL sodium methoxide in methanol (0.5 mol/l) at 80 °C. Fatty acids were converted to methyl esters by heating

84

with 2.5 mL of 14 % boron trifluoride-methanol reagent at 80 °C for 3 min. Fatty acids methyl esters (FAME)

85

were isolated with hexane (2×0.5 mL) after adding 1.0 mL of the saturated sodium chloride solution. Organic

86

extracts were dried with anhydrous sodium sulphate and evaporated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen.

87

FAME were diluted in 20 µL of hexane and stored at −20 °C. Separations of FAME were performed on a BPX

88

70 capillary column (60 m×0.25 mm i.d., film thickness: 0.2 µm, SGE) with helium as carrier gas. The injector

89

was heated to 250 °C and the detector to 270 °C. The initial oven temperature was 140 °C/min, thereafter

90

increased by 20 °C/min to 200 °C and held for 20 min and increased by 5 °C/min to 220 °C held for 25 min.

91

FAME standards (Supelco 37 Component FAME Mix) and CLA FAME reference standard (Nu-Chek-Prep,

92

INC., USA) were used to identify the fatty acids present in the samples.

93

3.

94

3.1.

95

Techniques such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography (GC) have been

96

generally used in the studies of edible oils. However, they are expensive and time consuming. Infrared

97

spectroscopy (IR) and NMR are fast and effective methods. FT-IR spectroscopy is a fast, non-destructive

98

technique that requires minimum sample preparation and has become a powerful analytical tool in food research.

AC C

EP

TE D

81

Results

FT-IR experiment

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 99

It is particularly important in the study of edible oils and fats and can be considered as a “green analytical method” [9].

101

The FT-IR spectra in the mid-infrared region of the six oil samples were used to identify functional groups and

102

the bands corresponding to various stretching and bending vibrations. Fig. 1 shows the IR spectrum of the hemp-

103

seed oil sample 1 as an example. The spectrum has a weak band associated with the overtone of the glyceride

104

ester carbonyl absorption at 3474 cm-1. The band at 3010 cm-1 is a result of stretching vibrations of the olefinic

105

CH double bond. This suggests the presence of a high amount of polyunsaturated acyl groups in the oil. The two

106

bands at 2925 and 2854 cm-1 represent stretching vibrations of the methylene group. The esters have two

107

characteristic strong absorption bands around 1750–1730 cm-1 and at 1300–1000 cm-1 [10]. The band at 1746

108

cm-1 (e) comes from the ester carbonyl (C=O) functional group of triglycerides, and the weak band at 1653 cm-1

109

(f) from C=C unsaturated acyl groups. The bands at 1400-1200 cm-1 correspond to bending vibrations of the CH2

110

and CH3 aliphatic groups (g). The bands in the region 1120-1093 cm-1 (h) are due to stretching vibrations of C–O

111

ester groups (antisymmetric axial stretching and asymmetric axial stretching). The bands at 722 cm-1 (i) arise

112

from overlapping of the CH2 rocking vibrations and out-of-plane CH vibrations.

SC

RI PT

100

M AN U

113

Fig. 1. FT-IR spectrum of HO1; the region at 1500-500 cm-1 is considered as a “fingerprint”.

115

FT-IR spectroscopy can be successfully used to monitor the adulteration of hemp-seed oil with much cheaper

116

oils. At first sight, the FT-IR spectra of various vegetable oils are similar. However, they can be distinguished by

117

the analysis of frequencies especially in the region at 1500-500 cm-1, considered as a “fingerprint region”. The

118

differences between the HO1-HO6 were small but visible, mainly in peak intensities and occurred only in limited

119

regions of the spectra. There is a difference, best seen at 1440-1460 cm-1, that allows distinguishing HO3 and

120

HO4 from other samples (HO1, HO2, HO5 and HO6) (Fig. 2). The band at 1465 cm-1 for HO1, 2, 5 and 6 is split

121

into two, while for HO4 and HO3 it is not. The band at 1465 cm-1 represents bending vibrations of the CH2 and

122

CH3 aliphatic groups.

123

Rohman et al. described the analysis of virgin coconut oil mixtures with olive oil and palm oil [11]. The

124

adulteration of coconut oil with these two oils caused changes in the shape of the bands at the fingerprint region.

125

Thus we can suspect that the differences of the band’s shape at 1465 cm-1 for hemp-seed oils may be induced by

126

another composition of the hemp-seed oil sample.

127

According to manufacturer’s information HO6 is obtained from Cannabis indica. The analysis of the fingerprint

128

region for this sample of oil shows another composition of hemp oil. However, the band at 1456 cm-1 is split into

129

two, like in HO1, HO2 and HO5, the general shape of the bands in the fingerprint region is different. Fingerprint

130

analysis allowed us to extract 3 samples of oil with similar composition (HO1, HO2, HO5) and 3 samples with

131

distinct composition (HO3, HO4, HO6).

AC C

EP

TE D

114

132 133

Fig. 2. Fingerprint region at FT-IR spectra of HO1-HO6.

134

3.2.

135

The most popular method of hemp oil receiving is cold-pressing of the seeds. By this method, 60–80 % of oil

136

can be extracted from the seed material, depending on the settings of the screw press. To define the fatty acid

GC analysis

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT composition, GC analysis was performed for the samples of cold pressed hemp-oil. The results of the analysis

138

for six hemp-seed oil samples are given in Table 2 as means ±SD, analyzed individually in triplicate.

139

The analysis of fatty acid composition by GC shows that HO4 and HO3 differ from the rest of the examined

140

hemp oils. HO3, HO4 and HO6 have the highest level of GLA (3.57 – 4.51 %) as compared with HO1, HO2 and

141

HO5 (GLA: 0.46 – 0.63 %). However, HO3 and HO4 may be easily distinguished from HO6 by calculations of

142

LA:ALA ratio. HO3 and HO4 are two hemp-seed oil samples that have the lowest and the highest LA:ALA

143

ratio. Thus, the differences in the fatty acid composition may be proved by GC analysis.

RI PT

137

144 145

Table 2. Mean values and standard deviations of the fatty acid compositions (%) of the hemp-seed oil.

146

The contents of palmitic and stearic acids in hemp-seed oils ranged from 6.22 to 7.24 and 2.75 to 3.42 %,

148

respectively. The oils contain a high degree of unsaturation 88.90 – 89.42 %. The predominant fatty acids are

149

linoleic acid (52.13 – 56.80 %) and α-linoleic acid (14.80-19.10 %). The ratio between ω-6 and ω-3 fatty acids is

150

between 2.73 and 3.38.

151

The contents of palmitic and stearic fatty acids in the examined hemp-seed oils were comparable with those

152

described earlier (6.23 – 8.27 and 2.19 – 3.22 %, respectively) [12]. The level of the main fatty acid LA in HO1,

153

HO2, HO4, HO5 and HO6 was similar to that reported earlier (56.10 % on average) [13]. However, the content

154

of LA in HO3 is significantly lower. Additionally, the ALA value in HO3 is the highest, which affects the

155

LA:ALA ratio, reducing it to 2.73.The content of ALA in HO1–HO6 remains in agreement with the values given

156

by Anwar et al. (16.85 – 20.00 %) [12].

157

In 2009, The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) published its recommendations for PUFA:

158

• an omega-3 fatty acid intake of 2 g/day alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) and 250 mg/day long-chain omega-3 fatty

M AN U

TE D

159

SC

147

acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) • an omega-6 fatty acid intake of 10 g/day linoleic acid (LA).

161

The World Health Organization recommends an omega-6 fatty acid intake of 5–8 % of energy and an omega-3

162

fatty acid intake of 1–2 % of energy [14].

163

In addition to the fatty acids found in most of the commonly used edible oils, hemp seed oil contains remarkable

164

amounts of GLA which appears only in certain plant seeds. GC analysis shows that hemp-seed oil contains 0.46-

165

4.51 % of γ-linolenic acid. According to Matthäus and Brühl , hemp cultivars contain varying quantities of GLA,

166

ranging from 0.34 to 6.80 % [15]. Surprisingly, the content of GLA in HO3, HO4 and HO6 was significantly

167

higher (up to 4.51 %). These three oils are a rich source of GLA. Others have significantly smaller amounts of

168

GLA (up to 0.63 %). Higher amounts of this fatty acid are present in evening primrose (Oenotheramacrocarpa)

169

and borage (Borago officinalis) seeds. Both oils are used in dietary supplements and cosmetics. Certain studies

170

suggest that supplementation with GLA, and particularly combinations of GLA with (ω-3) long chain-PUFAs

171

have great potential to exert anti-inflammatory effects and may improve symptoms of several inflammatory

172

diseases [16]. Instead of borage oil which is rich in GLA but totally lacking ω-3 PUFAs (polyunsaturated fatty

173

acids), hemp oil may be considered as a better dietary source of GLA. The samples HO1-HO6 were produced by

174

cold pressing of hemp-seed. The profile of fatty acids is related to the method of oil receiving. In 2012 Porto et

175

al. described fatty acid composition of hemp-seed oil extracted by supercritical carbon dioxide [17]. It is

176

characterized by a higher amount of PUFA: LA (59.23-59.77 %), ALA (17.95-18.20 %) and GLA (3.42-3.58 %)

AC C

EP

160

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 177

and the degree of unsaturation up to 92 %. The edible hemp-seed oil manufactured by extraction using

178

supercritical carbon dioxide is so far unavailable on the Polish market.

179

3.3.

180

The main information given by NMR spectroscopy is chemical shift and intensity of the signals. NMR is

181

commonly used in qualitative and quantitative analysis of natural compounds and plant extracts as well as of

182

edible oils [6].

183

1

184

classical AV method, based on the analysis of 420 edible oil samples. Good agreement between both methods

185

was obtained. Numerous studies showed the advantages of NMR for the edible oil analysis: NMR spectroscopy

186

is reliable, fast and can analyze multiple components with only one measurement. It was shown that NMR is a

187

powerful tool to characterize edible oils in many different ways: 1H NMR spectra allow the reliable quantitation

188

of the fatty acid content with respect to monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), polyunsaturated fatty acids

189

(PUFA), and saturated fatty acids (SFA). This process is so straightforward that even a completely automatic

190

processing and analysis of the spectra is possible.

191

1

RI PT

NMR analysis

M AN U

SC

H NMR was applied for determination of free fatty acids [18]. The NMR method was compared with the

H spectra were recorded for all hemp-seed oil samples in CDCl3, the spectrum of HO1 is illustrated in Fig. 3a.

192

Fig. 3. (a) 1H NMR spectrum of hemp-seed oil (HO1) in CDCl3 and (b) superimposed signals in 1H NMR spectra

194

of HO3 and HO4 in CDCl3.

195

Ten multiplet resonances of the vegetable oil are visible in the 1H NMR spectrum. The area of these signals is

196

proportional to the number of each kind of hydrogen atoms present in the sample. The signals in the NMR

197

spectra of vegetable oil were assigned previously [19]. Signal 1 results from the overlapping of the triplets of

198

methyl proton signals of all acyl groups, except those of linolenic acid. The resonance 2 is a triplet assigned to

199

the methyl protons of linolenic acid. In the spectra of HO1-HO6 the area of resonance 2 varies. The most

200

significant difference is observed for HO3 and HO4 (Fig. 3b).

201

Multiplet number 7 is formed by the overlapping of signals of methylene protons of linoleic and linolenic acyl

202

groups. 1H spectra of six hemp-seed oils were compared and significant differences in shape of the signals are

203

visible (Fig. 3b).

204

Popescu et al. gave the formula that allows one to determine the composition of ALA and LA by analyzing the

205

area of these signals [5].

AC C

EP

TE D

193

(ଶ)

206

‫( = ܣܮܣ‬ଶ)ା(ଵ)

‫= ܣܮ‬

ଷ∗(଻)ିସ∗(ଶ) ଷሾ(ଶ)ା(ଵ)ሿ

207

ALA and LA compositions obtained from NMR and GC experiments are shown in Fig. 4.

208

4.

Disscusion

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT It is known that a balance between omega-6 and omega-3 acids is important for health [20]. Therefore, it is

210

relevant to evaluate the ratio of ω-6 to ω-3 fatty acids. GC analysis allows one to establish this ratio, however,

211

the NMR technique can also be recommended. The LA:ALA ratio for each hemp-oil is similar when obtained

212

either from GC or NMR experiments (Fig 4).

213

Fig. 4. Correlation of LA:ALA ratio calculated from GC and NMR experiment (the coefficient of determination

214

is 0.98).

RI PT

209

215

In the past three decades the intake of omega-6 fatty acid increased and the omega-3 fatty acid decreased,

217

resulting in a large increase in the ω -6: ω -3 ratio from 1:1 in the past to 20:1 today. It is therefore essential to

218

return to a balanced dietary ω-6:ω-3 ratio. Analytical methods are needed to determine the LA:ALA ratio.

219

Besides GC experiment, 1H NMR in solution may be considered as a fast and effective method. The technique

220

has the potential to substitute a wide range of classical analysis methods in the edible oil industry. The NMR

221

method might be useful for pharmaceutical industry and even introduced in Pharmacopeia.

222

5.

M AN U

SC

216

Conclusions

223

Gas chromatography is a routine method in fatty acids profiling. However, two spectral methods: NMR and FT-

225

IR are also useful in routine examination of edible oils. NMR spectroscopy surpasses the chromatographic

226

methods (GC) for vegetable oils as concerns analysis time and sample preparation.

227

The differences of fatty acid composition caused by variability of Cannabis sativa plants or by adulteration of

228

hemp-seed oil with other oils should be supervised. Spectral methods described above have a potential in fast

229

screening of hemp oil quality.

230

Acknowledgements: This work was supported by the Medical University of Warsaw (FW28/PM1/16). The

231

authors would like to thank Ms. Agnieszka Białek (Ph.D.) for performing the GC measurements and Ms. Joanna

232

Kolmas (Ph.D.) for her assistance in FT-IR experiments.

233

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

234

References:

235

[1] EFSA, Scientific Opinion on the safety of hemp (Cannabis genus) for use as animal feed, EFSA J. 9 (2011)

236

1-41.

237

[2] C.D. Porto, D. Decorti, A. Natolino, Potential Oil Yield, Fatty Acid Composition, and Oxidation Stability of

238

the Hempseed Oil from Four Cannabis sativa L. Cultivars, J. Diet. Suppl. 12 (2015) 1-10.

239

[3] A.P. Simopoulos, The importance of the omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid ratio in cardiovascular disease and

240

other chronic diseases, Exp. Biol. Med. 233 (2008) 674-688.

241

[4] P. Dais, E. Hatzakis, Quality assessment and authentication of virgin olive oil by NMR spectroscopy: a

242

critical review, Anal. Chim. Acta. 765 (2013) 1-27.

243

[5] R. Popescu, D. Costinel, O.R. Dinca, A. Marinescu, I. Stefanescu, R.E. Ionete, Discrimination of vegetable

244

oils using NMR spectroscopy and chemometrics, Food Control 48(2015) 84-90.

AC C

EP

TE D

224

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [6] C. Skiera, P. Steliopoulos, T. Kuballa, U. Holzgrabe, Determination of free fatty acids in pharmaceutical

246

lipids by ¹H NMR and comparison with the classical acid value, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 93 (2014) 43-50.

247

[7] D. Castejón, P. Fricke, M.I. Cambero, A. Herrera, Automatic ¹H-NMR Screening of Fatty Acid Composition

248

in Edible Oils, Nutrients, 8 (2016) 93-103.

249

[8] G. Downey, P. McIntyre, A.N. Davies, Detecting and quantifying sunflower oil adulteration in extra virgin

250

olive oils from the Eastern Mediterranean by visible and near-infrared spectroscopy, J. Agric. Food Chem. 50

251

(2002) 5520-5525.

252

[9] J. Namiesnik, Green analytical chemistry - Some remarks, J. Sep. Sci. 24 (2001) 151-153.

253

[10] M. Ahmad., K. Ullah, M.A. Khan, M. Zafar, M. Tariq, S. Ali, S. Sultana, Physicochemical Analysis of

254

Hemp Oil Biodiesel: A Promising Non Edible New Source for Bioenergy, Energ. Source Part A 33 (2011) 1365-

255

1374.

256

[11] A. Rohman, Y.B. Che-Man, A. Ismail, P. Hashim, Application of FTIR Spectroscopy for the Determination

257

of Virgin Coconut Oil in Binary Mixtures with Olive Oil and Palm Oil, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 87 (2010) 601-

258

606.

259

[12] F. Anwar, S. Latif, M. Ashraf, Analytical characterization of hemp (Cannabis sativa) seed oil from different

260

agro-ecological zones of Pakistan, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 83 (2006) 323-329.

261

[13] H. Mölleken, R.R. Theimer, Survey of minor fatty acids in Cannabis sativa L. fruits of various origins,

262

JIHA 4 (1997) 13-17.

263

[14] European Union, Official Journal of the Commission of the European Communities. Regulation No.

264

1169/2011, 2011.

265

[15] B. Matthäus, L. Brühl, Virgin hemp seed oil: An interesting niche product, Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 110

266

(2008) 655-661.

267

[16] J.Y. Jung, H.H. Kwon, J.S. Hong, J.Y. Yoon, M.S. Park, M.Y. Jang, D.H. Suh, Effect of dietary

268

supplementation with omega-3 fatty acid and gamma-linolenic acid on acne vulgaris: a randomised, double-

269

blind, controlled trial, Acta Derm. Venerol. 94 (2014) 521-526.

270

[17] C. Da Porto, D. Decorti, F. Tubaro, Fatty acid composition and oxidation stability of hemp (Cannabis sativa

271

L.) seed oil extracted by supercritical carbon dioxide, Ind. Crops Prod. 36 (2012) 401-404.

272

[18] C. Skiera, P. Steliopoulos, T. Kuballa, U. Holzgrabe, B. Diehl, 1H NMR approach as an alternative to the

273

classical p-anisidine value method, Eur. Food Res. Technol. 235 (2012) 1101-1105.

274

[19] G. Vigli, A. Philippidis, A. Spyros, P. Dais, Classification of edible oils by employing

275

spectroscopy in combination with multivariate statistical analysis. A proposal for the detection of seed oil

276

adulteration in virgin olive oils, J. Agric. Food Chem. 51 (2003) 5715-5722.

277

[20] L.G. Yang, Z.X. Song, H. Yin, Y.Y. Wang, G.F. Shu, H.X. Lu, S.K. Wang, G.J. Sun, Low n-6/n-3 PUFA

278

ratio improves lipid metabolism, inflammation, oxidative stress and endothelial function in rats using plant oils

279

as n-3 fatty acid source, Lipids 51 (2016) 49-59.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

245

9

31

P and 1H NMR

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 1. Description of tested hemp-seed oils (country of origin and plant species) Sample Country of origin Source HO1 Czech Republic Cannabis sativa HO2 Poland Cannabis sativa HO3 Canada Cannabis sativa HO4 France Cannabis sativa HO5 Poland Cannabis sativa HO6 New Zealand Cannabis indica

RI PT

280

281 282 283

Table 2. Mean values and standard deviations of the fatty acid compositions (%) of the hempseed oil

M AN U

SC

Fatty acid composition (g/100g fatty acids) by GC, * LA, ** GLA, *** ALA Fatty acid HO1 HO2 HO3 HO4 HO5 C16:0 7.24±0.60 7.07±0.15 6.22±0.19 6.53±0.12 7.16±0.04 C16:1 0.11±0.01 0.09±0.01 0.10±0.01 0.10±0.02 0.08±0.01 C17:0 0.07±0.01 0.06±0.03 0.06±0.01 0.05±0.01 0.04±0.01 C18:0 3.11±0.09 3.29±0.08 3.05±0.05 3.11±0.21 3.42±0.07 C18:1 12.60±0.06 11.44±0.14 10.20±0.37 13.05±0.18 12.31±0.02 C18:2* 56.80±0.29 56.63±0.21 52.13±0.01 55.17±0.33 56.58±0.14 C18:3** 0.49±0.04 0.46±0.01 0.63±0.09 4.51±0.16 3.57±0.03 C18:3*** 16.80±0.30 18.76±0.05 19.10±0.08 14.80±0.03 17.47±0.04 C20:0 0.23±0.03 0.16±0.05 0.20±0.06 1.77±0.11 0.97±0.02 LA:ALA 3.38±0.05 3.02±0.02 2.73±0.04 3.73±0.03 3.24±0.02 ratio

AC C

EP

TE D

284

10

HO6 6.41±0.11 0.10±0.02 0.04±0.01 2.75±0.14 8.42±0.04 55.22±0.16 4.42±0.18 18.94±0.30 1.49±0.08 2.92±0.05

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

Fig 1. FT-IR spectrum of HO1; the region at 1500-500 cm-1 is considered as a “fingerprint”.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

Fig. 2. Fingerprint region at FT-IR spectra of HO1-HO6.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Fig. 3. (a) 1H NMR spectrum of hemp-seed oil (HO1) in CDCl3 and (b) superimposed signals in 1H NMR spectra of HO3 and HO4 in CDCl3.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

3.5 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.5

3 3.5 LA:ALA ratio GC

RI PT

LA:ALA ratio NMR

3.7

4

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

Fig. 4. Correlation of LA:ALA ratio calculated from GC and NMR experiment (the coefficient of determination is 0.98).

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights •

FT-IR spectroscopy is a fast technique to monitor variability of hemp oil composition.



1



Spectroscopic methods may be used in a routine control of oil quality.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

H qNMR is proposed as a new and fast method to determine ω-6 to ω-3 ratio.