THERIOGENOLOGY RECEPTORS
FOR
Ph.
ESTROGENS
AND
1)"
Stanchev
A.
a;d Departments Swedish
of
'Clinical
Univeryity
Department
of
of
PROGESTERONE Kunavongkrit
H.
Eriksson
Received
L.-E.
,
CERVIX I)
Edqvist
3)
and
Karolinska
for
PORCINE
2 Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sciences, Uppsala,Sweden and
Chemistry
Agricultural
Chemistry,
IN THE 2)""
Institutet,
Stockholm,
Sweden.
November 2, 1983 March 15, 1984
publication: Accepted: ABSTRACT
In vitro binding -levels of estradiol fractions of
the
was
of
about
maximum ing
cells
estrous
to
obtained The
level
onset
heat
of
during
sites
was
300 seen
of
the
however,
cycle,
the on the
1200
reached
day
its
to
of
used
phase
on
end
day
3-4. of
determine
at and
The
lowest
stages receptors
increased the
estradiol
luteal
in
and the
of
4700
760
sites
sites/cell
on
days
on
3-4
uterus.
support
a concept
response via
to
steroid
in
which
increased
the
in
the
constriction
concentrations
of
of
Furthermore, the
cervix
circulating
day
and
nisms
levels
of
its cycle proThe nuclear
during the luteal phase. theories on the endocrine
receptor
the
number
a steady level of about 1000 sites/cell The data obtained agree with present regulating
a
decreas-
nuclear
phase
reduction
to
cycle,
3-4.
level
of
nuclear
different
cytosolic receptor and the estradiol receptor.
a value
the
and
cytosolic
1 of
the No
1 and
to
cytosolic
cervix
luteal days
in
estradiol
sites/cell.
between
increased
porcine
sites/cell
The level of the progesterone file was very similar to that of receptor,
the
between to
were
receptors
sites/cell
increased from
from
7600
2700
methods
concentration
sites/cell
a level
nuclear
progesterone
approximately
receptor of
exchange
cycle.
4500 of
and and
mecha-
these
data
occurring
estradiol
1
showed
in
is mediatec
receptors. INTRODUCTION
of and
The
consistency
the
estrous
of
the
cycle.
edematous(l).
cervix
in
During
estrus,
Ovariectomy
causes
the the
pig
is
correlated
cervix
is
a complete
to
the
constricted,
relaxation
of
stage rigid
the
vagi-
Injection of estrogen into ovarnal portion of the porcine cervix(Z). iectomized sows causes cervical constriction. In a recent study, Kunavongkrit et a1.(3) found that the tonicity of the cervix increased from .a;a;:;imately and concluded
4 days softened
before
the
again
that
estrogen
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
:This
during
might
work
be
was
onset the
of
heat,was
most
postestrous
implicated
supported
in
by
firm
period. the
the
increased
Swedish
of
Reproduction,
**
be
requested.
From
whom
reprints
may
MAY 1984VOL. 21 NO. 5
Bulgarian
authors tonicity
Council
Forestry and Agricultural Research. The award of a fellowship Vienna, to Dr. Ph. Stanchev is gratefully acknowledged. * Present address: Department of Physiology and Endocrinology, of Biology and Immunology Sofia 1113, Bulgaria.
during
The
Academy
of
for
by
IAEA,
Institute of
Science,
757
THERIOGENOLOGY the cervix information
and on
that
rectal
ovarian
examination
of
the
cervix
provides
valuable
function.
The purpose of the present study was.to further elucidate the role of estrogen and progesterone in regulating the consistency of the cervix by determining the binding of these two hormones to their respective cytosolic and nuclear receptors in porcine cervical cells obtained at different stages of the estrous cycle. MATERIALS AND METHODS Experimental Animals and Sample Collection Eleven Swedish Landrace and Swedish Yorkshire qilts or Landrace X Yorkshire crossbreeds, six to eight months old and with body weights ranging from 80 to 100 kg, were used. The animals were housed in pens with three to four gilts per pen and were fed a commercial pig feed. Estrous detection was performed twice daily in the presence of a boar. After at leastone regular estrous cycle,the animals were slaughtered on day 'T(fourgilts), days 3-4 (four gilts) or days IO-13 (three gilts) of the estrous cycle. The first day of heat was defined arbitrarily as day 1 of the estrous cycle. Blood samples were collected by jugular venipuncture prior to slaughter. The samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm. Plasma was removed and stored at -20 C until analysed for progesterone (4) and estradiol-17B (5) by radioimmunoassay. All hormone determinations were carried out in duplicate. Tissue samples from the cervices were collected immediately after slaughter. The tissue specimens were taken from the middle part of the cervix and frozen in nitrogen within 20 min after collection and kept at -7O'C until analysed. Chemicals and Buffers Radiolabeled compounds [ 2,4,6,73Hl estradiol-17B(S.A. 104 Ci/mmol), ['H-17a-methyl]prbgesterone(R'5BZO),S.A. 87 Ci/mmol and non-labelled R 50'20were obtained from New England Nuclear Corp.(Boston,MA). Diethystilbestrol(DES) and liquid scintillation cocktail were obtained from Sigma Chemical Corp.(Saint Louis,MO) and Koch-Light Lab Ltd.(Colnbrook, Berks, England),respectively. All other chemicals were of reagent grade or better. Buffer A was IO mM Tris-HCl(pH 7.4), buffer B was IO mM Tris-HCl and 1.5
mM
EDTA(pH
7.4)
and
buffer
C was
buffer
A and
IL
bovine
serum
albu-
min.
The subscript following the letter designation of a buffer( e.g. A ) denotes the percentage glycerol(v/v) in the buffer. Dextran-coated c ;1O arcoal(DCC) consisted of 1 g Norit and 50 mg Dextran T70 in 100 ml buffer( Buffer A ,. for cytosolic receptors of progesterone (PRc) and buffer B for cytosolic receptors of estradiol (ERc) 1. Receptor Assay The tissue samples from the cervix were divided into smaller portions and 300-500 mg were used for determination of progesterone receptors(PR) or of estrogen receptors(ER). The samples were weighed and placed in for PA and B for ER). All subsequent steps were carried 6 ml buffer( A out at 0-4'C e%!ept where otherwise noted. The tissue was homogenized by means of a motor-driven glass-glass homogenizer with three S- to 8-set burstsat 30-set intervals. Homogenate(0.2 ml) was taken and kept at -2O'C
758
MAY 1984VOL. 21 NO. 5
THERIOGENOLOGY for DNA measurement. The remainder was centrifuged at 800~~~ for 20 min. The supernatant was then centrifuged at 105,000xc~for 60 min and used immediately for cytosolic receptor(Rc) determination. The crude nuclear pellet from the first centrifugation was washed twice by rehomogenization in 3-ml buffer(A for PR and B for ER) and centrifuged at 800~~~ for wash. The final pellet was resuspended in 6 ml of the 15 min after eat?I0 samy buffer. [ Hlestradiol-17B and r3H] 17a-methyl(R 5020) were used as the labellcd ligand. The saturytion analyses were performed with six different concgntrations of [ H] estradiol-17B( from 0.125 to 4 nM/l) for ER or of [ HI R 5020(from 0.3 to IO nM/l) for PR. Aliquots(0.25 ml) of the cytosolic or nuclear fraction were added to two parallel series of the tubes (in duplicate), one containing 0.1 ml of the labelled steroid and the other containing 0.1 ml of the same concentration of the labelled steroid plus a 'TOO-foldmolar excess of unlabelled steroid(DE5 for ER and R5020 for PR). The optimal conditions for the DCC- and Nuclear-Exchange assays have been examined in detail and the data are presented elsewhere ( Stanchev, Ph., Edqvist, L.-E. and Eriksson, H., In preparation). The following incubation times were used for ERc,ERn,PRc and PRn: ERc and ERn 18hat 4'C PRc 1 h at 20°C PRn 24hat 4'C. Bound and free steroid in the cytosol was separated by adding 0.5 ml DCC to each tube. After incubation for IO min at O'C, the tubes were centrifuged at 3000~~~for IO min . The supernatant was added to 4 ml of liquid scintillation cocktail for radioactivity determination. Incubations of the nuclgar fractions were terminated by centrifugation at 3000~~~for IO min at 4 C. The pellet was then washed three times with 1 ml buffer (C for PRn and B for ERn). The Rn-bound ligand was extracted with 1 ml absolute ethanol( overnight,room temp.) and counted for radioactivity. Other Analytical Methods DNA concentration was determined by the method of Burton(6) as modified by Richards(7). The dissociation constant and binding data were determined by the method of Scatchard( corrected for nonspecific binding according to Chamness & McGuire(9), as was described previously(l0). The receptor concentration was expressed as number of sites per cell. The conventional statistical methods were used for analysis of the results(l1). RESULTS The dissociat.Jonconstantsc Gj3for cytosolic and nuclear pellet fractions for [ Hlestradiol and-[ HI R 5020 in the cervix were estimated from Scatchard plot analysis. Representative plots are shown in Figure 1. The Scatchard plots were linear and the K_ values differed for the two ligands. These binding data indicated a smgle class of high-affinityllC low-capacity bindinq18ites with $ values ranging from 1.8 to 4.2x IO and from 1.1 to 2.3 for estradiel and R 5020, respectively. Plasma levels of progesterone and estradiol-17B in the slaughtered pigs are shown in Table 1. The plasma progesterone level was low during day 1 (range 0.2-0.8 nmol/l) and somewhat elevated at days 3-4(range 3.1-9.6 nmol/l) of the estrous cycle. On days IO-13 of the estrous
MAY
1984 VOL. 21 NO. 5
759
cycle,progesterone level of estradiol-770 30 pmol/l) on days mean value of 37.5
levels
ranged from 22.0 to 42.0 nmol/l. The plasma was around the basal level(mean value less than 3-4 and days ‘TO-13 of the estrous cycle. A higher pmol/l was obtained on day 1 of the estrous cycle.
0.2
ESTRADIOL
0 0.15 Kd .3.86-lo
/\
lx1o-‘o
5x1 o-l0 BOUND (nM/I
1x1o-g 1
Figure
l.Representative Scatchard plot analysis of r3H]estradiol and [3 HIR 5020 binding in cytosolic(O-----C)) and nuclear(%) pellet fractions of pig cervix. Cytosolic and nuc.Jear pellet(0.25 rns) were incubated with varying concentrations of [ Hlestradiol and [ H] R5020 as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. Each point is the mean of the duplicate values. 760
MAY 1984 VOL. 21 NO. 5
THERIOGENOLOGY Table
1. Plasma levels of progesterone and estradiol-77D in different stages of the estrous cycle
Day IO-13 Day 1 Day 3-4
(n = 3) (n q 4) (n q 4)
from 11 gilts
Progesterone(nmol/l)
Estradiol-170(pmol/l)
mean
range
mean
range
32.0 .0.3 6.9
22.0-42.0 <0.2- 0.8 3.1- 9.6
23.0 37.5 20.3
16.0-32.0 23.0-51 .O 19.0-23.0
c]
10
Cytosoli c
isl Nuclear
5
(3)
b (3)
0
10-13 DAY
Figure
2.
1
OF
ESTROUS
3-4 CYCLE
Estradiol binding in the cytosolic and nuclear fraction of the pig cervix ( mean 2 SEM ) on day 1, days 3-4 and days IO-13 of the estrous cycle. Numbers of examined samples are given in parentheses.
The estradiol binding to cytosol and nuclear receptors in the cervix in maximum amounts on the is shown in Figure 2. The ERc are present day of estrusjaverage of 7614 sites/cell),decreasing to lower levels (mean of 2670 sites/cell) on days 3-4 of the estrous cycle. The levels of ERn did not differ when the day of estrus is compared with days 3-4 of the estrous cycle. During the luteal phase (day 10-131, the mean ERc was 4595 sites/cell and the mean for ERn was 331 sites/cell.
MAY 1984 VOL. 21 NO. 5
761
THERIOGENOLOGY
q Cytosolic ISl
Nuclear
10
5
L
0 DAY
Figure
3.
OF
ESTROUS
CYCLE
Progesterone binding in the cytosolic and nuclear fractions of the pig cervix ( mean + SEM ) on day 1, days 3-4 and Numbers of examined samplec days ICI-13 of the estrous cycle. are given in parentheses.
The progesterone binding to cytosol and nuclear receptors in the cervix is shown in Figure 3. On the day of estrus , the levels of PRn were low( y = 758 sites/cell), whereas the levels of PRc were high (?? = 9156 sites/cell). On days 3-4 of the estrous cycle, PRn was high (?? q 4723 sites/cell). The mean values for PRn and PRc were lower for pigs slaughtered on days lo-13 than for pigs slaughtered on days 3-4 of the estrous cycle.
762
MAY
1984 VOL. 21 NO. 5
THERIOGENOLOGY DISCUSSION The Scatchard analysis of ligand-receptor affinity for estradiol-17l? and R 5020 displayed linearity and indicated a single class of highThe K_, for estradiol-170 lay in low-capacity binSlAng sites. affinity, for both ERc and ERn. These data were the range 2.1 to 4.2 x 10 similar to those reported for pig endometrium(l2) and rat uteri(l3) but were different from those obtained for endometrium from gilts by Pack et a1.(14). The K for progesterone is similar to data reported for uteri from the ra-e (15,16),from the ewe(l7) and for bovine endometrium reported for some of the hormone(18). The differences in K values as compared to those presented by receptor complexes in thi$-study other authors are most likely due to the different methodology employed. Such differences have been described and discussed(23). It is generally considered that the ERc content increases in the rat uterus during the follicular phase in response to a rise in the circulating estradiol level (13,19), and when the complex is translocated to the cell nucleus (ERn), it initiates the specific metabolic changes which represent the target cell response to estrogen(20). Progesterone provokes a rapid and specific reduction of ERn in the uterus of the hamster(21). Although it is clear that progesterone and estradiol have involved are 1~s:: mutually counteractive effects on ERn, the mechanisms clear. In this study it was found that the level of ERn increased from a luteal phase value of 330 sites/cell to 1200 sites/cell during estrus. This agrees closely with the concomitantly observed elevated plasma level of estradiol and the resulting translocation of ERc to the nucleus. During the same period,no change in plasma progesterone concentration was seen, whereas a small reduction in PRn from IROO sites/cell to 760 These findings offer an explanation for the estrogensites was recorded. mediated constriction of the cervix found during estrus and the soft consistency of the cervix during the luteal phase. However,on days 3-4 of the estrous cycle,a stage in the cycle when the cervix is gradually softening,the levels of both ERn and PRn were high. It is known that estrogens act to increase the tissue content of progesterone receptors (22),whereas progesterone counteracts the action of estrogen by reducing This effect of progesterone the tissue level of estrogen receptors(23). on the estrogen receptor level is brought about by a mechanism in which progesterone blocks the second phase of the replenishment process, i.e. the expression of a relatively soft the -de novo synthesis(23). Hence, cervix during this cycle period might be explained by a progressive reduction in estrogen sensitivity in the cervix, caused by a progesterone mediated lowering of estrogen receptors. The high concentration of ERc anti the comparatively low concentration of ERn on day 1 may reflect the replenishment of ERc. The highest level of estradiol in blood in pigs with normally functioning reproductive cycles usually occurs during the days immediately preceding standing estrus(3). High levels of estradiol will cause a depletion of CRC to the receptor,the complex will bc because upon binding of the steroid translocated to the cell nucleus where it appears as ERn complexes(23). Such a depletion of ERc will be followed by replenishment through reactivation of ERn complexes and -de novo synthesis of ERc molecules.
MAY 1984 VOL. 21 NO. 5
763
THERIOGENOLOGY In oryans merely
that
The
high
plained
the
of
PRc
on
of
day
the of
circulating
of
PRc.
RNA
finding
estrous
and of
to
the
consistency
levels
that
of
the
follicular
the
via
probably
exat
Furthermore,estradiol
protein
this can
synthesis(24,25,26). low
PRc
levels
in
phase(27). the
presence
cervical
occurring
specific
is
progesterone
in
estrogen
of
specific
tissue.
cervix,receptor-binding
constriction
is mediated
replenishment
cycle
relatively
this study demonstrates In conclusion, gen and progesterone receptors in porcine suggest
steroids,EPc
1 of
through the
the
to
levels
depletion
PRc
with
during
response ERn.
low
slow
tallies
uterus
in of
relatively
synthesis
finding rat
grow
subsequent
stimulate the
not
recycling
level
by
stage,with This
do
involves
When
estrorelated
characteristics
response
to
high
estradiol
receptors.
REFERENCES
1. Rigby, 675 2.
Smith, tion
J.C. of
-19: 3.
J.P.
cervix
and
Nalbandov,
uterine
of
the
sow
during
oestrus.
A.,
plasma
tency
of
Bosu,
W.T.K.,
the
Karlberg,
levels cervix
of in
The
the
levels
of
plasma
Boilert,
The
role
of
of
the
cervix
K.
and
Einarsson,
hormone
in
in
swine.
-80:
the
672-
relaxa-
Am.J.Vet.Res.
the B.
Rhesus
sow.
L.-E.,
Theriogenology
Lindberg,
effect
of
estrogen monkey.
Edqvist,
P.,
various
The
and
L.-E.,
Johansson,
-13: E.D.B.,
of
the
61-66
Martinsson,
progesterone
Contraception
relationship and
-20:
dosages
Martinsson, K. The influence of conjugated assays using different antibodies against 891-894
5.
estradiol-17T3,progesterone
the
Edqvist,
E.D.B.
in
A.V.
portion
Johansson,
-22:
Vet.Rec.
(1958).
Kunavongkrit,
cycle 5.
the
15-18
between
4.
The
(1967).
consis-
(1983). K.
and
lynestenol
during 677-684
on
menstrual (1976).
Lindberg,
estrogens in estradiol-17B.
P.
and
radioimmunoSteroids
(1973).
6.
of the conditions and mechanism of the diphenylBurton, K. A study amine reaction for thecolorimetric estimation of deoxyribonucleic acid. Eiochem. J. -62: 315-323 (1956).
7.
Richards, increased
8.
Analytical
Biochem.
Scatchard,
G.
ions. 9.
Ann.N.Y.
Chamness, correction
764
G.M. Modifications of the sensitivity and simplicity
G.C. and
The
-57:
attractions
Acad. and
369-376
Sci.
McGuire,
interpretation.
giving DNA.
(1974). of
-51:
diphenylamine reaction in the estimation of
proteins
660-672
for
small
molecules
and
(1949).
W.L. Scatchard plots: Common errors Steroids (1975). -26: 538-542
in
MAY 1984VOL. 21 NO. 5
THERIOGENOLOGY IO. Snochowski,
M., L.-E.
skeleton
muscle.
11. Snedecor, 12. Deaver, diol and
and
pigs.
80-90
Methods.
Biol.Reprod.
Eriksson,
J.Steroid
Biochem.
Yu,
E.,
5th
B.A.,
l:
and
their
ed.
C.,
receptor
Leung,
Walters,M.R.
17.
rat
uterus:
8
1137-1144
:
Zelinski, ence
of
18.
Clark,
J.H.
and
receptor
M.B.,
Hirota,
in
M.
gilt
of
Zelinski, zation of
and
Anderson,
Grody, tion
M.B., Noel, cytoplasmic
3:
Review 21.
22.
1:
the
Nuclear the
content
of
mammary gland and uterus (1982). -27: 658-664 receptors J.
Peck,
Schrader,
subunit
W.T.
structure
141-163
phase
Steroid
of
the
Biochem.
D.W.
F.
Influ-
progesterone
of
and
the
ovine
and
Stromshak,
receptors
and
of
Stromshak,
and
estrous
(1960).
and diestrus.
E.J.Jr.
and
endometrial
luteal
P., Weber, progesterone
in
J.Anim.
Clark,
J.H.
F.
the
Sci.
-55:
Estrogen
to receptor estrogen 160-167 (1975).
0'
Malley,
steroid
B.W.
hormone
Characteri-
endo376-383(1982).
bovine
induced
Activation,
receptors.
uterine
binding
by
transforma Endocrine
(1982).
R.W., Chen, T.J., Hendry 111,W.J. and Leavitt, W.W. Progesterone regulation of estrogen receptor in the hamster uterus during the estrous cycle. Endocrinology 107: 383-390 (1980). Evans,
Leavitt,
W.W.,
Toft,
D.O.,
cific progesterone receptor properties and regulation
-94: ?3.
S.C.
throughout
cytoplasmic
progesterone
and
743-751
proestrus
J.N.,
W.W., and
sites.
(1978).
characteristics.
responses and growth: Relationship uterine nuclei. Endocrinology 96: 20.
binding
Brooks,
endometrium
Keenan,E.J.
N.A.,
during
Reprod.
metrium during 19.
Cytosol
estradiol-17B
receptors Biol.
receptor-
nuclear
(1977).
exogenous
estrogen cycle.
and
Uterine
with
(1976).
Variation
Assay
receptor, estraof non-pregnant
(1980).
-103:2129-2136
B.S.
and
porcine
Ames,Iowa,1956,pp.70-74.
J.W.
Douraghy,
Endocrinology
and
Hardin,
1039-1043
estrogen
cycle.
72-77
interaction
Christensen,
cytosolic
W.C.Y.
H.A.
and
-23:
H.
in
(1961).
estrogen and progesterone receptors in the of rat at time of parturition. Biol.Reprod. 16.
Petersson,
receptors
D.R. and Guthrie, H.D. Cytoplasmic estrogen progesterone concentrations in endometrium
J.H.,
estrous
Dahlberg,
glucocorticoid -53:
Statistical
complexes
and
K.,
and
J.Anim.Sci.
estradiol
Pack,
15.
Androgen
G.W.
pregnant
13. Clark,
14.
Lundstrom,
Edqvist,
1041-1053
Strott, in
C.A.
the
during
and
hamster
the estrous
O'Malley, uterus:
cyle.
B.W.
A spe-
Physiologic
Endocrinology
(1974).
Clark, J.H. and Peck, E.J.Jr. Female Sex Steroids, Receptors Function. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 1979, pp. 99-114.
MAY 1984VOL. 21 NO. 5
and
765
THERIOGENOLOGY
24.
25.
Corvol,
progesterone
-90:
1464-1469
Hsueh, of
27.
R.,
Freifeld,
binding
Peck,
receptor
337-339
E.J.Jr. and
Horwitz,
K.B. in
Leavitt,
W.W.,
and
human
Bardin,C.W.
gu-inea
and
pig
Clark,J.H.
estrogen-induced
McGuire, breast
Chen,
W.L. cancer.
T.J.,
Biology of progesterone Eds. B.W. O'Malley and
766
and in
In vitro uterus.
studies
Endocrinology
Progesterone uterine
antagonism
growth.
Nature
(1975).
receptor
pp.
M.
proteins
(1972).
A.J.W.,
estrogen
-254: 26.
P.,Falk,
of
Do,
Estrogen
control
J.Biol.Chem. Y.S.,
Carlton,
of
progesterone
-253:
2223-2228
B.D.
and
Allen,
(1977). T.C.
receptors. In: Receptors and Hormone Action. L. Birnbaumer. Academic Press, N.Y. 1978,
157-188.
MAY 1984 VOL. 21 NO. 5