Reducing Industrial Electricity Costs-an Automo6ve Case Study Alan Price is Principal Engineer for Ford Mofor Company in ifs plant engineering office. He has a Bachelor of Science degreefiom,Case Institute of Technology and has done graduate
work in mathematics,
electrical
engineering, and computer science. Marc Ross is professor of physics at the University of Michigan and senior scientist in the Energy and Environmental Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory. He holds a Ph.D. in physics from the University of Wisconsin. With Robert H. Williams he has written a book on energy policy, Our Energy: Regaining Control. Recently he has worked on energy issues under the aegis of Congress’ Office of Technology Assessment and the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy. The authors wish to thank the many individuals who contributed to this effort, especially George Sherkus of the Ford Motor assembly plant in Edison, NJ., whose comments inspired this effort, and Charles Millar of the Michigan Public Service Commission for his comments and counsel.
40
Energy savings of 30% and capacity savings of 20% are achievable in automotive manufacturing and like industrial facilities, by the authors’ observations. Utilities and regulators can help gain this improved efficiency by providing customers solid rate and planning information. Alan C. Price and Marc H. Ross
I. ABSTRACT
T
he automotive industry and similarly situated industries
automative manufacturing and similarly situated industries. These conclusions are based on
purchase about 13% of all electric
the writers’ observations at more
utility sales in the United States.
than 40 facilities in North Amer-
This article explores the potential
ica and Europe.
for reduction in electricity purchases by automotive manufactur-
II. INTRODUCTION
ing facilities through qanded use me asures currently of conservation
The authors of this paper met as participants in a study commis-
employed in some plants.
sioned by Michigan Governor
Existing, cost effective conserva-
Blanchard to assess the states’s fu-
tion installations observed by the
ture electricity requirements and
authors have the potential to re-
estimate the costs and potential ca-
duce electrical energy use by 20 to
pacity contributions from both
40% and peak demand by 15 to
supply side (new generation) and
30% for existing applications in
demand side (conservation).
The
The Electricity Journal
authors’ work on the demand
than 1% to total cost of production
motor controls.
side portion of the study included
and is perceived in an historical link
visits to several auto assembly
between increased labor productiv-
and stamping plants in Michigan.
ity and increased electricity use.
A few of the conclusions in this
Labor cost is about 25% of the pmd-
paper replicate those published in
uct cost in the automotive industry
the Michigan study,’ but many
and actions that might increase
are based on observations from in-
labor cost have been looked on with
III. MONITORING
AND
CONTROL A. Information on Electricity Use A key to identifying opportunities to reduce the cost of electricity
dustrial facilities not included in
disfavor. Recent attitudes have
is measuring how much is used,
that study, including a large num-
changed in response to the rise in
when, and where. Even without
ber from other states and coun-
the price of electricity the publicity
systematic information at the
ties,
given to potential further increases
point of use, a great deal can be
pplication of conservation
and the demonstrated success of
learned from a load curve for an
techniques has been slow in
pilot installations of conservation
entire plant showing the power
devices and techniques.
use over the day or better still,
A
industries like automotive manufacturing because many of the tech-
Electricity consumption in auto-
several days.
S
ample load curves for three au-
niques involve relatively new hard-
motive manufacturing is shown
ware, such as semiconductors and
broken down by principal end
computers, that requires trial pilot
use in Table 1. These are esti-
shown in Figure 1. Half-hour inte
tomotive assembly plants are
installations. No rational manager
mates because few auto plants
grated electrical demand data were
wants to risk production outages
measure electricity use by func-
obtained for the 1987 Memorial
because an untested device that has
tion. However, it is generally ac-
Day weekend (May 23 through 25).
been added to the machinery
cepted that approximately three-
These. plants assemble different ve
needed to meet production sched-
fourths of the electricity used in
hi&s but all have essentially the
ules failed. The applications de
auto plants is for motor operation.
same process, so a comparison of
scribed in this paper am the known
Thus, many of the conservation
the load on Saturday evening with
survivors of the trial period. Conservation techniques dis-
applications described in this
the Friday peak indicates the “tight-
paper will involve motors and
ness” of shutdown. Data were nor-
cussed in this paper are applicable to a much broader slice of industry than the automotive plants
Table 1: Electricity Consumption in Auto Manufacturing,
where they were observed. Instal-
(Percentages as of Early 1980s)
lations involving several of the techniques are known to exist in plastic molding, metal stamping, electrical equipment and white good (major appliance) factories. In 1985 automobile manufacturers and parts suppliers spent over $1 billion, or $120 per vehicle, for electricity? This corresponds to
lectricity
Assembly Space conditioning, (mostly fans)
17
Paint systems (mostly fans)
27
-
Lighting
15
10
14
25
8
6
2
32
10
6
4
4
100%
100%
70%
80%
Compressed Materials
air
handling,
E
Miscellaneous
torically been assigned a low
power tools
Metal forming, shearing, Welding & soldering
priority in fabrication and assembly
ventilation
Stamping
20
about 2240 kWh per vehicle.3
conservation has his-
by Function
machining
TOTAL Share of above use attributable
to motors
activities because it contributes less
July 1989
41
and ventilating units. The com-
tion of off-peak energy at Plants 2
load for Friday as the 100% value,
pmssedairsysteminPlant1is
and 3.
and plotted for the &hour period
equipped with satellite compressors
commencing at oO:OO hours on Fri-
and section valves enabling shut-
departmental level is a powerful
day, May 22. The Memorial Day
down of the main system during
conservation technique. Sub-me-
malized using the peak electrical
Sub-metering electricity at the
weekend was chosen for this com-
non-production hours, thus largely
tering has been observed by visi-
parisonbecause, with the exception
eliminating compressed air leakage.
tors at most Japanese auto plants,
of the maintenance crew working
Plants 2 and 3 lack these facilities.
where data are used to establish
for eight hours on Saturday at Plant
T
1, the weekend shutdown was es-
he installation of equipment at
department budgets and evaluate
Plant 1 to facilitate tight shut-
worker and supervisor perfor-
sentially complete at all three plants.
downs was started in response to
mance. Departmental sub-meter-
The Saturday evening load at
electricity rate increases driven by
ing is used at some automotive
Plant 1 was approximately one-
high oil prices in the 1970s. The util-
plants in North America with fa-
sixth the Friday peak (shutdown
ity serving Plant 1 had oil as the
vorable results; and while the
ratio of 6:l). The shutdown ratios
marginal fuel at nearly all hours,
practice has not yet gained wide acceptance, its use is growing.
at Plants 2 and 3 were approxi-
thus the rate increases in the 1970s
mately 3:l and 2.5:1, respectively.
were heavily weighted toward the
Differences in tightness of shut-
energy side. This resulted in a high
down are attributable more to dif-
off-peak energy charge that jrzstified
ferences in control equipment
installing facilities to reduce off-
tervals with a weekly summary pro-
than to the presence of an army of
peak (non-production) energy use.
vided to departmental supervisors.
equipment “shutter-offers ” at
The utility serving Plants 2 and 3
After metering by department had
t A
one Canadian auto plant,
electricity use by each depatt-
ment is measured in 15-minute in-
Plant 1 and the absence of this
had, and still has, coal as the mar-
been in place for three years, bud-
army at Plants 2 and 3. A look at
ginal fuel at nearly all hours and
geting by department was insti-
the control facility differences be-
thus (properly) has a lower off-peak
tuted and a reduction of over 5% in
tween Plant 1 and its two sister
energy charge and a higher de
annual electric enery use resulted.
plants reveals substantial differ-
mand charge than the utility serv-
This reduction was achieved largely
ences.
ing Plant 1. Thus, Plant 1 was pre
in non-production hours and in
sented with a strong incentive to
shifts with very low rates of produc-
conserve off-peak energy while less
tion.
lant 1 has Energy Management I?
System (EMS) control of most
Systematic departmental sub-
incentive produced less conserva-
of the lighting and major heating
Figure 1: Shutdown Load Curves for Three Assembly Plants (Demand Friday, May 22-Saturday,
Plant
1 operated
only
and had a maintenance shift
42
on Saturday.
one shift
on Friday
crew in for one
Plant
2 had some departments
two shifts There
and others
were
one shift
no operations
May 23)
operating
Plant
on Friday.
and none on Saturday.
3 operated
two full
shifts
on Friday
on Saturday.
The Electricity Journal
metering usually is very costly to
As an example, if 10 million
the rising popularity of “mini
install as a retrofit to an existing
kWh were used in a month, with
mills” that process steel scrap
plant. However, where the distri-
3.0 million kWh in the on-peak pe-
“mined” from local salvage yards
bution bus system is designed
riod, and the peak demand was
into products such as reinforcing
with metering in mind, as was the
20,000 kW, the charge for the
bars and light structural steel
case at the Canadian plant, the
month would be:
shapes. The connected electric
sub-metering costs very little. At this plant electricity costs are one of several monitored components in the overall cost-reduction goal for each department.
This 5% re-
20,OOOkW x $13.14/kW $262,800 (demand
= charge)
3,000,OOOkWh x $O.O40/kWh = $120,000 (on-peak energy charge)
duction was achieved in spite of
7,000,OOOkWh x $O.O33/kWh = $231,000 (off-peak energy charge)
low off-peak electricity prices be-
Total = $613,800
furnace load is between 5% and 15% of system peak load on many utilities. Utility rates which incorporate higher demand charges and lower energy charges and generous interruptible-service
de-
mand discounts can effect substantial reductions in the contribu-
cause measured achievements by individual departments were rec-
or an average cost of 6.1 cents per
tion of electric furnace shops to
ognized.
kilowatt hour. Note that nearly
system peak demand.
A
nEMScanbeusedbothfor
40% of the cost of electricity is as-
submetering and as a sophisti-
sociated with the demand charge.
prior to production start-up and turns them off immediately after the workday ends. The mom so phisticated EMS schemes can also be used to control peak demand. B. Reducing the Demand
ome utilities offer special rates to customers that can reduce
loads at the utility dispatcher’s di-
cated time clock that turns on the lights and equipment immediately
S
Substantial savings can result from departmental metering and energy budget&g.
rection to lessen system peaks. !3everal manufacturers in Georgia, including one auto assembly plant, have installed on-site generation that is operated for this purpose at the direction of the utility C. Thermal Storage and Peak Shaving
Charge
Most auto plants don’t have
Typically large customers are
large electric loads that can be dis-
charged for both maximum lants with major loads that can
placed in time to meet utility
hours and for total energy use
P
(kWh). For example, the present
such as metal melting can substan-
tant and growing exceptions are
Detroit Edison Company (DECO)
tially reduce their demand charge.
process-related cooling loads and
rate includes a monthly on-peak
Electric melt shops in the steel and
air conditioning of manufacturing
demand charge of
casting industries normally use de
facilities. Factory cooling loads
$13.14/kW/mo, and energy charges of 4.0 cents/kWh on-
mand control to minimizthede mand charge. Metal melting fur-
have grown with the use of computers and “clean rooms“ in pro-
peak, and 3.3 cents/kWh off-
naces are sometimes operated
duction. Cold storage facilities
peak, including fuel and other ad-
entirely off-peak to eliminate the de-
have been used in warm climates
justments.
mand charge. Metal melting shops
to reduce peak electric loads for
energy charges vary slightly with
ate usually the largest customers
several years, but only recently
the delivery voltage; the values
taking interruptible service from
have facilities of this type been in-
cited are medians.) DECO’S de-
those utilities that offer low cost in-
stalled in the cooler climates. Two
mand charge is based on on-peak
terruptible service rates.
facilities recently completed in
power use (kW) during specified
(Both demand and
periods, which are the weekday hours from 11 a.m. to 7 p.m.
July1989
be shifted to off-peak hours,
The electric furnace load on most utility systems grew with
needs for interruptibility.
Impor-
Michigan with year-round cooling requirements, a hospital and a
43
corporate headquarters that includes a computer center, incorpo-
IV. MOTOR
SYSTEMS
The following discussion is or-
important opportunity, VSCs, are presented. Pump and fan systems tradi-
rated thermal storage facilities
ganized around the equipment,
with favorable results.4
starting with motor controls; but
tionally were designed with over-
it is important to examine the en-
size constant-speed motors to fa-
thermal storage facility at a on-automotive manufacturAn ing plant in Kentucky incorporates
tire system and to consider the
cilitate control and assure
load and its role in the production
adequate flow in extreme condi-
a three-million gallon storage tank,
process.
tions. Although VSC installations
which has been in operation for two
A. Motor Controls
are relatively costly, with the
years and is credited with reducing
Motor applications where ac-
equipment costing about three
the plant’s electrical demand by ap
tual load requirements of the pro-
times the motor cost,7 the reduc-
proximately 5%.5 This application
cess are highly variable are often
tion in electricity use is large
was a retrofit to an existing system,
cost&f ective applications for
enough to provide a good return
but the greatest economies are ob
solid state motor controls. The
on investment.
tained when cold storage is part of
last few years have seen signifi-
lations are cost effective with dis-
Many VSC instal-
the original design. Athermal stor-
cant reductions in the first cost of
placed electricity values of 4 cents
age application at a new auto as
electronic controls that can be ap-
per kWh.
sembly plant in Kentucky is cred-
plied to motors of up to several
ited with cutting the electrical
hundred horsepower. There are
Th ant provides a good example.
charges for plant cooling by
two broad groups of electronic
Rxisting constant-speed systems
roughly half.6 The contribution of
controls: Variable Speed Controls
have high piessums designed in, to
process-related cooling and air con-
(VSCs) applicable principally to
provide plenty of flow with all ma-
ditioning loads to electrical system
pumps, fans and compressors
chines in production &Iistorically/
peakscouldbeminimizedwith
that have variable flow require-
more was better, so the flow rates
proper incentives to install thermal
ments, and Variable Voltage Con-
and pressures were almost always
storage. This would in turn lessen
trols (VVCs) that are applicable to
overdesigned.)
the need for new construction by
variable loads requiring constant
A VSC offers two major advan-
the affected utility systems, with a
speed such as stamping presses
potential benefit to all ratepayers.
and metal cutting machine spin-
tages: (1) precise pressure and adequate flow can be maintained at
dles. Two examples of the more
levels substantially below those
e pumping of machining cool-
Many industrial processes can yield significant energy savings.
The Electricity Journal
required with a fixed-speed sys-
viously possible. The average elec-
creased use of high-efficiency mo-
tem; and (2) flow can be turned
tricity savings depend on boiler
tors in industry is 1 to 2% of the industrial load.
off for workpiece change at one
load, but will exceed 60% in a typi-
machining station without affect-
cal year. Coal use has, of course,
ing the flow and pressure at other
alsobeen reduced and the reduced
stations. In one application at an
steam loss has reduced water treat-
engine plant, pressure at the
ment cost?
pumps was reduced from a typical 64 psi to 45 psi, average flow
M
C. Motor Drive and End-Use Efficiency Improvements Improving the mechanical efficiency of the transmission or end-
otor control applications con-
use also reduces energy use in
tinue to be discovered by
electrical motor systems. Gener-
cut in half, and power usage re-
plant engineers. Demonstrations of
ally this type of efficiency im-
duced by over 50% with no ad-
control applications for specific situ-
provement is made by the equip-
verse effect on part quality or tool
ations in a great variety of plants are
ment manufacturer to ensure satisfactory service (e.g., ineffi-
life.8
cient gear boxes tend to overheat
An ancillary benefit of the reduced fluid pressure and flow is a
and fail prematurely).
In any
reduction in “misting” of the cool-
event, field retrofits of major me-
ant. Reducing the coolant-system
chanical components on a ma-
pressure and flow reduces the ve-
chine are usually so expensive
locity of the stream directed at the
that replacing the entire machine
workpiece, thus reducing the ten-
is more economical.
One retrofit
dency of the coolant to “atomize”
item that is economically practical
into an aerosol mist. Coolant mist
is the replacement of standard vee
is objectionable because it in-
belts with cog belts. Before-and-
creases ventilation requirements,
after tests run by user personnel
cleaning costs, etc.
on actual field installations have shown motor load reductions of 2
Energy used to control air flow from fans can often be reduced by
to 10% after installation of cog
replacing damper control with a
belts. Belt drives make up a vari-
VSC. Damper control of flow
able, but significant, portion of
from draft fans on coal-fired boil-
the total motor drive population in most plants. A reduction in
ers is a typical example. In one application, control of combus-
needed before wide adoption will
total industrial plant load of
tion and air pollution as mea-
occur. Few plants have made sys-
about 1% as a result of vee belt to
sured by opacity was inadequate
tematic surveys of motor control op-
cog belt conversions appears a
at low load. For this reason, boil-
portunities.
reasonable expectation.
ers had to be operated above re-
B. Replacing Inefficient
Motors
quired levels during low steam
The efficiency difference of
load periods, with part of the
about 5% between standard and
steam being vented.
high-efficiency motors,10 is usu-
v. COMPRESSED
AIR SYS-
TEMS Central compressed air systems
ally enough to justify use of high-
are a feature of many modern in-
contmlling the fans with VSCs
efficiency motors in new applica-
dustrial plants, representing 10 to
reduced electricity usage in two ways: (1) power to the motors was
tions and when a standard motor
30% of the total plant electrical
is being retired. ** It is not enough
load in the automobile industry
reduced during low steam flow pe
of a difference to warrant replac-
riods, and (2) lower steam flows
ing a working standard motor.
Uses for compressed air range from hand-held rotary tools for
were achieved than were pre
Total savings anticipated from in-
tightening nuts and bolts to huge
E
liminating
July 2989
the dampers and
45
duction hours. For plants with more production than down hours, leak reduction programs are essen-
Table 2: Demonstrated Application of Systems to Reduce Air Compression Loads in Non-production Hours Base
Segmented
Case
System
tial to control compressed air use.
Satellite System
B. Leak Reduction Compressed air leak reduction programs have been instituted at
Production Compressed
air (cfm)
8000
8000
8000
many plants with varying suc-
Compressor
motors (hp)
1600
1600
1600
cess. Correcting the accessible, ap parent (audible) leaks at valve
Non-Production Compressed
air (cfm)
Motors inc. auxiliaries (hp) Power (as % of production)
2500
1500
300
900
600
150*
45
35
5
packings, quick disconnect fittings, hoses and pipe fittings can reduce compressed air usage by 10 to 25% if pursued to completion. The results of a one-year
*Duty factor of 50%
leak reduction campaign at one plant were effective for at least pneumatic cushions for the sta-
arate production-line sections of
two years after the program was
tionary dies in stamping presses. Air-driven hand tools have a
the compressed air network from
completed and the crew reas-
the main supply. They reduced
signed to other tasks. However,
higher power-to-weight ratio than
the off-shift use of compressed air
an ongoing program in the form
electric tools and have the further
from 2500 cfm to 1500 cfm, or by
of a permanently assigned leak re-
advantage of no shock hazard.
40% (Table 2). The 1000 cfm re-
pair crew is often necessary to
Unfortunately
duction, equivalent to about 200
achieve a lasting result.
kW, saves more than $300 during
S
leaks waste up to
50% of the energy input to the
ome major air leaks are not ac-
compressed air system in many
a single weekend shutdown even
plants.
at the off-peak electricity rate of
the uninitiated. An example is the
$O.O3/kWh.
die cushion on large stamping
ven
A. Off-Shift Operations
E
well-maintained com-
pressed air systems require 20
2. Satellite System. A more radical approach was also tried at the
cessible nor are they obvious to
pressesusedtosupportinsertsin the lower die. As the press de-
to 30% as much power during non-
same plant: provision of com-
scends, the sheet metal is clamped
production hours as they do during
pressed air only where it is regu-
by the frames of the upper and
full operation. In automotive as-
larly needed under non-produc-
lower dies; then it is drawn as the
sembly plants there is some non-
tion conditions. Eight small
insert is pushed down under the de-
production-hour air use for paint
sections of the network were iso-
scending insert of the upper die.
agitation, pneumatic instruments
lated with check valves and pro-
The quality of the stamping de-
and maintenance activities; but
vided with small local compres-
pends on a smooth and constant TP
most compressed air use at those
sors in the 15 - 25 hp range. (See
sponse from the cushion. Histori-
times goes to leakage. Two &rate
Table 2.) This configuration re-
cally, standard die cushions have
gies were tried at the automotive as-
duced electricity usage by 80%
been cylinders pressurized with air
sembly plant identified as Plant 1
from full production to the week-
from the plant system. These units
(in Part III above): segmented sys-
end shutdown cited earlier.
leak little in new or recently rebuilt
tems and satellite systems (see Table
S
hutdown techniques are, how-
presses, but as little as three
ever, most effective in plants
months use on a moderate sized
that operate only one shift and thus
stamping press will often produce
have more “down” hours than pro
leaks of 100 cfm. In a large stamp
2).
1. Segmented System. Automatic valves were installed to sep-
46
7’heElectricity Journal
ing plant with 200 presses this trans-
pistons used as counter-balance
lates into 20,ooOcfm of compressed
cylinders in a stamping press. In
cal, metal halide lamps may be in-
air which in turn equates to about 4
all, a reduction of about 25% in
stalled with an energy saving of
MW of electric load.
compressed air requirements has
about 50% compared to mercury
ie cushions are particularly
been achieved at a stamping plant
vapor or fluorescent lamps. If
tnkrblesomebecause repair re
D
tions where color rendition is criti-
in Michigan from this technology
color rendition is not critical, high
quims taking the press out of ser-
after converting one-half of the
pressure sodium lamps offer en-
vice for several weeks (a luxury
presses. I3 The complete program
ergy savings of 5060% compared
most stamping plants cannot af-
will probably achieve a lo-15% re-
to mercury vapor.
ford) otherwise the leak must be fed
duction in plant electricity use.
with air constantly becauseif the
(There is some uncertainty be-
cushion ” bottoms” it may be diffi-
cause applications have not yet
S
fluorescent tubes. More efficient
ome local or “tasY lighting already involves high-efficiency
cult to raise. Recently press owners
been made with all types of
high-frequency ballasts and specu-
and rebuilder-s have begun replac-
presses.) As the technology gains
lar reflectors can be installed with
ing the pistons with air actuators
wider acceptance it should have a
savings of 50 to 60%. With half as
(heavy-walled rubber air bags sup
major impact on compressed air
many bulbs, this combination will
porting a metal plate) with ex-
usage in the stamping industry,
deliver about 90% as much light as
tremely favorable results. Some of
where 25-35% of the electricity
at present. The performan~ of the
these installations have been in ser-
load is for air compressor drives.
reflectors after use in various manu-
vice for over five years with little or no perceptible air leakage.” This technology has two major
facturing conditions is being evalu-
VI. LIGHTING The typical goal for plant light-
ated. A major office building in Michi-
benefits aside from reduced elec-
ing is to provide adequate area
gan provides an example of sav-
tricity costs: more consistent prod-
lighting using highly efficient
ings possible from reworking
uct and greatly reduced mainte-
lamps with reasonable color, such
lighting systems in administrative
nance (with reported cost savings
as the high-pressure sodium
facilities. High-efficiency fluores-
in maintenance and replacement
lamp, and to provide more in-
cent ballasts and improved reflec-
comparable to those in electricity). The technology has other applications, for example replacing air
tense higher-quality light on pro-
tors are improving lighting levels
duction activities, using efficient
and simultaneously reducing elec-
fluorescent lighting. For situa-
tricity use for lighting from 3.7 to 1.8 Watts/ft2 in office areas. When completed, this lighting system renovation will reduce lighting load by about 50% and the total building electrical load by nearly 10%. Similar results have been obtained in a manufacturing facility of 1950s vintage where fluorescent fixtures using 2W /ft2 have been replaced by metal halide lamps consuming 1W /ft2 and providing improved lighting levels. ssuming that lighting conA
Finding areas where savings are possible can seem like reinventing the wheel.
July 1989
sumes an average 10% of total
manufacturing electricity use and
47
thatlessthan25%ofthatuseisnow
plant electricity usage by about
useful thermal energy and met cer-
in high-efficiency features, we esti-
5%. Exact measurements of the re-
tain efficiency standards.
mate that 3 to 4% of total electricity
duction are not available because
use in manufacturing will be saved
major process changes were in
through the above lighting im-
progress during the period that
provements.
VII. HEATING AND VENTI-
systems in U.S. industry reflect
of Electricity
One approach is to cogenerate
the new H&V system was in-
two multiple-purpose
stalled.
able forms of energy at a site re-
transport-
mote from the point of use, usu-
LATING SYSTEMS Heating and Ventilating (H&V)
A. Cogeneration and Steam
VIII. COGENERATION
ally a power house. Three kinds
The advantage of simulta-
of prime movers are in wide use
the fact that many if not most,
neously generating shaft power
for this purpose: steam turbines,
U.S. manufacturing plants are
and heat is that in converting heat
combustion turbines and recipro-
over 30 years old. While nearly
into shaft power all engines must,
cating engines.
all these facilities have seen major
according to the second law of
process changes, few have had a
thermodynamics,
discharge a sub-
team turbine cogeneration is S
typically employed for large
complete overhaul of their H&V
(X25 MWe) applications with a high
systems. As these systems are re-
steam demand (>250,fXX1lbs./hr)
placed, significant reductions in
and is not common in the automo
electricity use can result.
tive industry because it lacks large
r example, a 30 year-old plant
year-round steam loads. Common
I? in Ohio had a mixture of steam
users of steam turbine cogenemtion
coil and both direct and indirect gas
include the petroleum refining and
fired heating units. ln all there were
pulp and paper industries, where
% H&V units with a total installed
process steam loads are substantial
motor load of over 2000 horse
and process by-products are a
power including fans on the coal
major boiler fuel source. Combustion or gas turbines pro-
fired boilers and steam condensate pumps. The H&V “system” lacked
vide a medium power output
coordination, with the result that
(one to 100 MW) with a lower ratio of thermal output to electric-
some areas were excessively drafty stantial part, typically one-half or
ity than is the case with steam tur-
more, of the input heat energy in
bine cogeneration.
the form of lower-temperature
mon type of combustion turbine
computer control of 16 new direct
heat. So, providing power and
installation (or simple cycle
fired gas H&V units with an in-
moderate-to-low
stalled motor load of 800 horse-
heat from one facility is more effi-
power of a combustion turbine to
power. The exhaust, fresh air and
cient than from two separate facili-
drive a generator and the exhaust
recirculation capabilities of the
ties. In many cases it is also more
new gas-fired units are fully con-
economical.
heat to raise steam for process heating in a specially designed
while others were under-ventilated. In 1987 the system was replaced. The new system features
trolled, using a standard IBM PC
temperature
ongress and the Carter Admin-
The most com-
cogeneration) uses the shaft
boiler. lf the steam and electricity
istration thought this practice C was worth special consideration.
can be used at the plant year-
The Public Utility Regulatory Poli-
systems are economical (i.e., the
cies Act of 1978 granted special
steam and electricity together are
terms of correcting the ventilation
legal status to facilities that simulta-
cheaper than providing them sep-
problems and has reduced total
neously produced shaft power and
arately by a boiler and by the elec-
equipped with special software to analyze information from temperature, pressure and haze sensors. The installation is a success in
48
round, then such cogeneration
The Electricity Journal
tric utility).
This is true even
when the cogeneration system is fired with natural gas. Such a system was installed at a Michigan plant in 1985. The 3.8 MW natural gas fired combustion turbine unit produces over 20,000 lbs./hr of 115 psi steam from the turbine exhaust.14
A
vailability for service of cogeneration units is compara-
ble to or better than that of utility central station generating plants. The unit mentioned above was on line for 98% of the planned operat-
Automobile assembly
[email protected] many opportunities for efficiency.
ing hours in 1987. A group of 24 similar units in the Netherlands
out going through the intermedi-
time. We have not addressed the
with over 480,000 total operating
ary medium of electricity. An ap-
issue of possible increases in elec-
hours reported a lifetime average
plication of this concept that has
tricity use for new applications.
availability of 95% on the same
reached the funded project stage
The anticipated impact on electric-
basis.
is using a combustion turbine for
ity consumption of increased use
The same basic equipment, a
directly driving an air compressor
of robotics is slight in our view, in
combustion turbine and a heat re-
for a stamping plant. About 14%
part because the reduced need for
covery boiler, can also be adapted
in losses are avoided by directly
worker comfort conditioning
for injection of some or all of the
driving the load: 1.5% at the tur-
often offsets the energy consump-
steam into the turbine at the com-
bine-generator gearbox, 5% or
tion of the robot. Even air condi-
bustion chamber (steam injected
more at the generator, 2% at the
tioning of entire manufacturing
gas turbine). This provides for
switchgear and transformers, and
operations has had relatively little
much higher electricity output
5% at the motor. Other applica-
impact on electricity use in facili-
and reduced net steam output,
tions involve using natural gas-
ties which incorporated thermal
thus enabling economic operation
fueled reciprocating engine drives
storage in the air conditioning sys-
with variable steam demand over
for air compressors and mechani-
tem design. However, the values
the year.i5 This configuration is
cal refrigeration equipment.
in Table 3 should not be taken to
relatively new, with several appli-
tential reciprocating engine appli-
mean that there will be no new
cations in California. A unit was
cations have been identified in
uses for electricity,
recently installed in an automo-
assembly plants where the ex-
G
tive plant in Michigani
and an-
Po-
haust heat would be used for heat-
ranting the uncertainty of our
estimate, the potential conser-
other installation is planned for a
ing hot water for the metal pre-
vation opportunity is quite large.
major office building in Detroit.
treatment baths,
The reduction in electricity purchases associated with cogeneration
B. Displacement of Electric Motor Drives with Engine
IX. CONCLUSIONS
is less certain than for other conser-
Drives
Table 3 shows our estimate of
vation measures because more variables am involved. The savings
used in the same immediate vicin-
the probable energy and capacity savings associated with various
ity, then substantial savings may
conservation measures being im-
ior, with existing technology cost
be achieved by cogeneration with-
plemented by industry at this
forecasts, and financial criteria. In
If shaft power and heat can be
July 1989
shown am based on current behav-
49
other words, Table 3 is based on
dustry, since earnings are the
should track utility costs as much as
projects which have already been
major source of capital for imple-
possible. Cost of service should be
successfully implemented in some
menting conservation.
the guiding principle in allocating
plants. In terms of 1989 conditions
years earnings have been rela-
charges to different groups of users
this is a business-as-usual estimate
tively good and projects requiring
and in setting the relationshipbe
of savings. We have not assumed
capital are thus more likely to be
tween energy and demand charges.
complete implementation of pro
implemented.
The industrial sector can and will re
jects where that seems unlikely ese results, while based on a
In recent
Manufacturers have many
spond to high demand charges
proven electricity conservation op
with a combination of peak-shaving
Th study of the automotive indus-
portunities, and most have access
facihties and conservation, and to
try, are applicable in general terms
to the money required to imple-
high energy charges with a combi-
to most fabrication and assembly ac-
ment them. What they do about
nation of cogeneration and conser-
tivities17because their processes ate
them, however, will depend on
vation, including reductions at off-
broadly similar and the ratio of elec-
the stimuli, in the form of rates
peakhours.
tricity cost to value of shipments is
and other financial incentives cre-
about 1 .O%or less. While nationally
ated by utilities and regulators.
the auto industry pumhases just
Perceived future rates are at least as important as current rates
The key factor that drives indus-
in framing decisions to invest in
over 1% of all electrical energy sold
trial users to install conservation
conservation and on-site genera-
by utilities, the assembly and fabri-
and on-site generating equipment
tion. The anticipated savings in
cation industries consume about
is, as it should be, the price of elec-
the second to fifth year beyond
13%.
tricity.
The speed with which these savings will be achieved by industry
the present usually have the great-
n view of that fact, we offer a few
est impact on decision making on
parting observations on the issue
such projects. Even where manag-
I
depends on several factors: elec-
of price which we hope will be use
ers do not rely on formal price
tricity price, management percep
ful to those in utilities and regula-
forecasts, they depend on their
tions of future price escalation,
tory
capital availability and improve-
policy The first point is that rates
bodies who determine prim
judgment about future prices. Thus, planning concerning rates
ments in conservation hardware (including reductions in installed cost).
Table 3: Estimate of Electricity Use Reduction Anticipated in the
Motivations for carrying out
Automotive Industryab
electricity-saving projects other
Energy
Demand
than price include: (1) interest of
(kWh)
(kW)
4-8
-
5-10
5-10
3-5
2-4
Lighting
3-4
3-4
Heating and ventilating
1-5
l-5
3-12
2-10
19-44
13-33
the senior management of the
Shutdown controlsC
firm, and (2) the ancillary benefits
Motor systems
of the projects. If a project will in-
Compressed
crease the reliability of production, improve working conditions and/or reduce maintenance requirements, as well as save energy, it will be done much more quickly. As we have indicated, many energy conservation projects have such ancillary benefits. The pace of saving also depends on earnings within the in-
50
Cogeneration
air systemsd
& electric
motor displacement TOTAL a The savings shown are characteristic
of present behavior
and an average electricity
price of
about 6 cents/kWh. b Percent of total electricity use at the plant. ~Includes EMS and compressed air controls discussed in text. Control of compressed air in non-production hours not included here.
The Electricity Journal
logne, West Germany
(Oct. 5-7, 1987).
9. R. Futryk and J.A. Kaman, Variable Speed Control of Lorain Assembly Plant Boiler Fans, Presented Ford International Cologne,
at 1987
Energy Conference,
West Germany
(Oct. 5-7,
1987). 10. W. J. McDonald
and H. N. Hickok,
Energy Losses in Electrical Power Systems, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS,
The end result: a smooth ride
forutilities,
and planning for investments in utility plant which customers will be expected to pay for should be disseminated to the industrial
industry, consumers, and the environment.
TURES 1985, STATISTICS FOR INDUSTRY GROUPS AND INDUSTRIES
high-efficiency
(1985) (including
large or very small motors.
electric energy use
and costs).
opportunity onsider, for example, “incen-
3. This is the electricity
tive,” “economic develop
ment,” or other discounted rates. Such rates are used, as a means of stimulating growth, at many utilities with temporary surplus capacity. But such rates also serve as a disincentive to conservation and cogeneration. While it is proper that conservation and cogeneration
tion and assembly roughly comparable
used in fabrica-
of motor vehicles. A amount of elec-
tricity is used to produce the materials of which the vehicle is made: primarily iron and steel, followed by plastics, aluminum, rubber, glass, copper, lead and zinc. The 2240 kWh figure includes the energy required to melt metal to make castings, such as engine blocks. 4. I? Wright, U-M Hospital Looks to Save Millions with VAV, Thermal Storage Systems, ENGINEERED
needed, it is equally important that
SYSTEMS
(Mar.-
5. J. A. Koehler, Stratified
needed.
Water Thermal Storage System”, 1986 Energy Technology Conference, Wash-
to reduce anticipated costs through conservation and cogeneration in ways that reduce costs for the entire customer community.
n
Footnotes: 1. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ELECTRICITY OPTIONS FOR THE STATE OF MICHIGAN: RESULTS FROM THE MEOS PROJECT
July 1989
(1987).
Chilled
The economics with
Establishing
Man-
Control with Flexible Actu-
ator Die Cushions, Presented at 1987 Ford International Energy Conference, Cologne, West Germany
(Oct. 5-7,
1987). 13. K. E. Robbins, Adapting tors to Stamping
Air Actua-
Presses at Grand
Blanc Stamping Plant, Presented at 1987 Ford International Energy Conference, Cologne,
West Germany
(Oct. 5-
14. R. Luke, A New Approach to a Turn-of-the-Century Technology, Presented at 1987 Ford International Germany
ington, D.C. Facility,
PLANT ENGINEERING, March 10, 1988; Toyota Grafts an Assembly Transplant to the U.S., BUILDING & DESIGN CONSTRUCTION, Sept. 1988, at 48-53.
En-
Cologne, West
(Oct. 5-7,1987).
15. R. H. Williams and E. D. Larson, Steam-Injected Gas Turbines and Electric Utility Planning,
6. Designing a State-of-the-Art
7. ELECTRIC
ufacturing
ergy Conference,
they be encouraged when they are
enable industrial customers to act
motor.
less favorable
7, 19871.
Apr. 1986).
on utility planning and rates will
are somewhat
12. K. L. Smedburg,
be discouraged when they are not
Reliable and timely information
11.For lo-150 hp motors, duty over 1000-1500 hours/year yields a 2-3 year simple payback for replacement of a motor at time of retirement by a
2. U.S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS, ANNUAL SURVEY OF MANUFAC-
community at the earliest possible
C
May-June
1985, at 803-819.
AND SOCIETY
IEEE TECHNOLOGY Mar. 1986 at 29-38;
and E. D. Larson & R. H. Williams, Steam-injected Gas Turbines, ASME J. OF ENG. FOR GAS TURBINE & POWER, Jan. 1987 at 55-63. 16. R. K. Rose and F. S. Ralbovsky,
POWER RESEARCH
IN-
STITUTE, ADJUSTABLE SPEED DRIVES: DIRECTORY, MANUFACTURERS AND APPLICATIONS (2d Ed. 1987). 8. R. E. Strohs, Application of Variable Speed Drive Pumping Systems for Energy Savings, Presented at 1987 Ford International Energy Conference, Co-
New Options and Design Approaches Gas Turbine Cogeneration Plants, TURBOMACHINERY
for
(Mar.-Apr.
1987). 17. Including all sectors of manufacturing, except some textile plants, pulp and paper mills, and industrial
chemi-
cal, petroleum refining, glass and cement, and primary metals facilities.
51