Journal of Molecular Structure, 173 (1988) 405-418 Else&r Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam - Printed
REFLECTION CRYSTAL
ABSORPTION
INFRARED
405 in The Netherlands
SPFCTROSCOPY
OF ADSORRATES
ON METAL SINGLF
SURFACES
M.A. CHESTERS School
of Chemical
Sciences,
University
of East
Anglia,
Norwich,
NR4 7TJ, U.K.
SUMMARY The practical considerations for reflection-absorption infrared spectroscopy (RAIRS) are discussed and an apparatus using an FTIR spectrometer is described. The RAIR spectra of ethyne, and of the substituted alkynes, propyne and but-2-yne adsorbed on the CuIlll) surface are described. Analysis of these spectra provides information on the nature of the adsorption site and the orientation of the adsorbate. The spectrum of hydrogen atoms adsorbed on the Cu(ll1) surface is described and related to the nature of the adsorption site.
INTRODUCTION The RAIRS technioue single crystal important
contributions
concentrated limited
surfaces
to surface
on strong
infrared
sensitivity.
extended
has been used for the study of adsorbed since the early 1970's
adsorbates.
Highly
sensitivity
spectrometers transform (ref. 5). transform
scanning
notably
carbon monoxide,
because
in the detection
limit have
of the technique
has been achieved
covering
spectral
to weak infrared
and discuss
absorbers,
of
such as
either by the use of dispersive range
(refs. 2,3,4)
a large proportion
In this paper I shall describe spectrometer
layers on metal it has made
during this time it has largely
absorbers,
a limited
spectrometers
While
In recent years improvements
the applicability
hydrocarbon
science
(ref. 1).
an experimental
the criteria
or with Fourier
of the mid-infrared
which
range
system using a Fourier
govern
the design of the
apparatus. The spectra
of adsorbed
ethyne
and the substituted
but-2-yne
will then be used to illustrate
selection
rule and analysed
rehybridization adsorbed
alkynes,
propyne
of the metal
in terms of the nature of the adsorption
of the adsorbate
and the orientation
of suhseouent
and
surface site, the
physically
layers.
Finally highest
the operation
the spectrum
sensitivity
002%2860/88/$03.50
of hydrogen
achieved
atoms on Cu(lll) will
with the current
0 1988 Elsevier
Science
experimental
Publishers
B.V.
illustrate system.
the
406 EXPERIMENTAL The criteria Greenler mirror
for the RAIRS experiment
(ref. 6) who calculated
resulting
showed a maximum of incidence
from one reflection absorption
(87-88O)
This behaviour conduction
electrons
to the metal surface results
Electric
is similar
atgrazing surface
vector directions
for p polarized
incidence
the electric
angle is - 900).
surface
oscillating
selection
angle
of incidence
electric
reflected
on infrared
to the metal
ray remains
and a node always
- 18001, Fig.
l(b).
light reflection
at near normal
parallel
from a metal
incidence
is nearly perpendicular
The
but
to the metal
Fig. l(a) (the phase change on reflection This phenomenon
perpendicular
for reflection
to the metal
surface will be excited. at a grazing
(typically
1 cm2 in
system in addition
molecules
the
modes producing
radiation
surface
on the optical < lOI
near
leads to what is now called
of p polarized
from a small single crystal
small sample size (typically
at
that the metal
fields parallel
on reflection
vector
angle
absorption
radiation.
radiation
area) is a quite severe limitation rather
and negligible
rule viz. that only vibrational
dipole moments
The requirement
The results
of the angle of incidence
(phase change
and can be supported,
the optimum metal
irrespective
by
AR, at a grazing
when one remembers
vector of an s polarised
at the surface
Fig. 1. surface. result
will neutralise
The electric
surface.
for s polarized
can be understood
radiation.
in reflectivity, radiation
determined
by a thin film on a metal
of infrared
or change
for p polarized
all angles of incidence
were originally
the absorption
to the
in a monolayer).
If we
were to restrict ourselves to a narrow angle of incidence range near the optimum,
say 87 k lo, this would
reflection-absorption
result
in an optical
cell of - 5 x 10e5 cm*.sr which
throughput
of the
is about three orders
of
407 magnitude
smaller
spectrometer. incidence
than the typical
In our experiments
range and we use 84 + 6O which
angle of incidence
AR Arbitrary
(
optical
curve
units
throughput
of a mid-infrared
we have compromised
FTIR
on the angle of
is illustrated
on a typical
AI? vs.
in Fig. 2.
1
Angie
of incidence
(degrees)
Fig. 2. Typical curve of G? vs e based on Greenler's reproduced with permission from ref. 5.
calculations,
300mm MATTSON CYGNUS 25
Fig. 3 Reflection-absorption system. A, detector; B, KBr lens; C& KRr F, Michelson interferometer; , E, sample; window; D, uhv chamber; P, gold grid polarizer, reproduced with watercooled globar source; permission from ref. 5.
408 The resulting
optical
10-s cm'.sr which
throughput
of the reflection-absorption
is sufficient
to provide
(ref. 7) when using a narrow band mercury A complete
reflection-absorption
The FTIR spectrometer,
Mattson
to 32 cm-' and a mirror
interferogram
one thousand
scan accumulation
resolution
limit.
electron
spectroscopy
spectrometer
beam splitter,
with
can be acquired 20 seconds.
cell windows
Spectra
to 400 cm-l but the
diffraction
for surface
The spectrometer
analysis
BEAM
t /?
RATIO
+ 100% AR R
11%
I
3000
I
I
2500
2000
Wavenumbers Fig. 4
Single
beam and ratio spectra.
of 1 x lO-lo
and with a mass
and detector
I(v)
0
the low
(LEED) and Auger
air. SINGLE
I
reported
scans at 4 or 8 cm-'
at a base pressure
electron
(AES) facilities
3500
in 0.2s and a
and lenses are KRr which
range of the spectra
low energy
dioxide-free
in Fig. 3.
range of 0.5 cm-l
cuts out at 800 cm-' so this defines
for gas analysis.
with dry, carbon
is illustrated
~0.01%.
The LIHV system operates
mbar and is equipped
range limit
(MCT) detector.
This means that a
takes 9 minutes
the low wavenumber
narrow band MCT detector wavenumber
telluride
25, has a resolution
at 4 cm-' resolution
with a noise level
restrict
apparatus
Cygnus
cell is N 3 x
at the dynamic
be the result of one or two thousand
The spectrometer would
cadmium
speed of 1.266 cm s-l.
double-sided
here will typically
spectra
1
I
1500
1000
box are flushed
409 The spectra
are reported
reflection-absorption surface water
is shown in Fig. 4.
vapour absorption
monoxide.
This
the clean metal adsorbate
surface
of carbon monoxide
is ratioed
a (relatively)
are still visible
necessary.
There
beam
on a Cu(lll)
It shows a number of sharp bands due to residual
against
and the result
absorptions
condensing
of a monolayer
and the one band (arrowed)
spectrum
against
as ratios of single beam spectra. The single
spectrum
due to the adsorbed
a similar
single beam spectrum
shows the absorption
flat baseline.
but can be reduced
is also a broad absorption
carbon
Residual
of
band of the
water
vapour
to a negligible
level if
band above 3000 cm-' due to ice
on the MCT detector.
EXAMPLES Ethyne adsorbed
on Cu(llll
The vibrational
spectrum
reported
using electron
spectrum
is compared
of ethyne
energy
adsorbed
loss spectroscopy
with the EEL spectrum
on Cu(ll1)
has previously
(EELS) (ref. 81.
in Fig. 5 with excellent
agreement,
2q20 I, t
I 400
I 1 1200
I
I Energy
6CH
Fig. 5.
EELS and RAIRS
spectra
I 2000
LEELS I
1
2800
Loss(cm-i)
"cc
of ethyne
I
"CH chemisorbed
on Cu(ll1).
been
The RAIRS
I-
410 though
now the inherent
higher
resolution
at 420 cm"
(or the vibration
of the absorption
dipole-excited and was assigned
of the molecule
for the metal-adsorbate being allowed
complex,
by the metal
results
(Table I), including
ethyne
smlecule
is strongly
bond order of between ligand
in cluster
compounds
(ref. 81 suggests
to either 3 or 4 metal
local symmetry
leads to the conclusion
possible
point group
deuterated
atoms.
data
molecule,
for the bands observed. stretch
on chemisorption
Comparison
be coordinated
TABLE
assignments
rehybridized
selection
rule and the tabulated
of the carbon-carbon
one and two.
surface
lead to just four fundamentals
for the adsorbed
in reasonable
The rather low frequency
the highest
selection
band wavenumbers
shows that this results
from the metal
must be in a high symmetry
C2,,, would
surface
stretch
the metal surface).
In fact
surface.
bands above
to the sytmnetric metal-carbon
apainst
rule and the fact that the ethyne molecule on the metal
by the
loss feature was found in the EEL
The rather simple RAIR spectrum
environment
bands are revealed
In addition to the three absorption
technique.
800 cm-l, one further spectrum
widths
indicates resulting
with spectra
that the in a CC
of the ethyne
that the adsorbed
ethyne must
This,
to the Cpv
in addition
that the ethyne
is adsorbed
at the
1
Assignment
of the Ethyne/Cu(lIll
Totally symmetric modes for C2,, point group vCH (sym) vcc 6CH (syml vMC (syml
site illustrated
chemisorbed
and but-2-yne
It is instructive substituted
c2n2
2914 1294 920
2189 1276
spectrum
state of ethyne
above 330 K the ethyne
Propyne
C2H2
in Fig. 5 where
So the vibrational
alkynes
RAIR spectrum.
it is coordinated has provided
on this surface.
desorbs without
c,~,
(EELS) 2920 1307 920 420
to four metal
us with a detailed On warming
atoms. model
the adsorbed
of the layer
decomposition.
on Cu(lll)
to consider as this will
the RAIR spectra
illustrate
of the adsorbed
the ability
of the infrared
411 technique
to resolve
layers
closely
on top of the chemisorbed
orientation
of molecules
The RAIR spectra Considering similar
coordination
Fig. 6.
RAIRS
asymmetric
spectra
I
I
2600
the fingerprint
modes
in the CH stretching to the expected
as for ethyne,
and deformation
if we assume
the methyl
I
I
1200
I
1000
(C) ethyne.
modes and a methyl
surface
selection
rule.
In
we see only one band and so clearly
produce
signals
a
too weak to observe.
region we see four bands,
fundamentals
about the
1400
(h) propyne;
by the metal
region of the spectrum
number of these "allowed"
assign
stretching
adsorbed
are shown in Fig. 6.
Fig. 6(b),
Z/cm-l
of (a) but-2-yne;
all be allowed
alkynes
propyne,
surface
2800
and symmetric
rocking mode would
substituted
to the EELS
state.
of the three chemisorbed
I
in contrast
form physically
and we learn something
layer,
to the metal
bands,
adsorbates
in the physisorbed
first the singly
3000
However
spaced absorption
We also find that the heavier
technique.
three of which we
and one to an overtone
of a methyl
deformation. The detailed by the spectrum deuterium
assignment
of the chemisorbed
of the species
(Figure 7).
propyne
with the acetylenic
This unambiguously
spectrum
hydrogen
identifies
is assisted
substituted
the CH stretching
by band
412 due to the acetylenic frequency
hydrogen
at 2855 cm-', perhaps
than the chemisorbed
significant
ethyne
that the wavenumbers
symmetric
surprisingly
CH stretch.
at a lower
It is
of the other bands in the CH stretching
region are unaffected
in the spectrum
indicating
negligible
coupling
acetylenic
hydrogen.
The fact that the other band in the spectrum
between
of the partially the methyl
shift from 1361 cm-' to 1353 cm-' in the spectrum molecule
suggests
its assignment
to the CC stretch
deformation
whose wavenumber
would
be expected
assignment
of the chemisorbed
propyne
of the Chemisorbed
Propyne/Cu(lll)
deuterated
is seen to
of the partially
deuterated
rather than to a methyl
to be unchanged.
spectrum
molecule
group modes and the
The full
is given in Table 2.
TABLE 2 Assignment
spectrum.
CH,CCH 2865
~1, VCH
v3, vcc *probably
coupled
Now turning di-substituted
TABLE
CH,CCD
with overtone
2923
2922
2883
2883
2828
2827
1361
1353
of methyl
to the assignment
alkyne but-2-yne,
2157, 2117*
rocking mode.
of the spectrum
of the chemisorbed
Figure 6(a), we find correlation
with the
3
Assignment
of Chemisorbed
but-2-ynelCu(ll1)
Spectra.
CH,CCCH, v9* VCH3(asy") VCH3( sym)
2930 2880
cn,cccn, very weak bands in 2000 - 2200vl, cm-' region.
2828 vp,
vcc
~11. PCH,
1392 1018
1356
413
(a)
CH,CCH
I I I I
2855 2883 I
/
1
3000
I
I I
2800
I
2600
/
I
I
2200
2000
-i&k-
'U/cm-'
Fig. 7
above
RAIRS
spectra
spectra
virtually
of (al Chemisorbed
simplifies
the task.
the same positions
carbon-carbon wavenumber.
stretching
The methyl
as in the propyne
band is ohserved,
in the propyne
modes are again too weak to be seen. In summary,
the infrared
group related spectrum
shifted
CHaCCD.
bands fall in
and the similar
further
to higher
of carbon-carbon
substitution
(1294, 1361 and 1392 cm-l) with
molecule
the desorption
stretching
increasing
substitution.
is reflected
temperatures
indicates
alkynes
surface
propyne
are fully
as for ethyne.
with increasing
a lesser degree of
This reduced perturbation
in a lower heat of absorption
for ethyne,
deformation
is given in Table 3.
to the Cu(lll) frequencies
to a methyl
The methyl
of the two substituted
with a similar mode of bonding
rehybridization
spectrum.
The assignment
spectra
The sequence
chemisorbed
(b) Chemisorbed
We also observe a band at 1018 cm-' which we assign
rock which was not detected
consistent
CHaCCH;
and but-Z-yne
of the
as evidenced
by
of 330, 270 and
240 K respectively. As mentioned but-2-yne chemisorbed
above continued
led to formation monolayer.
is shown in Fig. 8.
exposure
of a physically
The spectrum
of the Cu(ll1) adsorbed
of the monolayer
The bands are readily
assigned,
surface
to propyne
or
layer on top of the and multilayer
of propyne
Table 4, by reference
to
414
(b)
phase
I
3500
GO00
3000 3000
2500
2000 2000
1500
1000
g/ cm-'
Fig. 8 RAIRS spectra of (a) Chemisorbed physically adsorbed propyne. the spectrum carbon
of the gas (ref. 91.
skeleton
linear,
of the molecule
the molecular the acetylenic apparent
physically
CH stretch
to the molecular
adsorbed
The spectrum
molecules
of physically
than expected
to the molecular
Fig. 9.
state.
randomly
adsorbed
The spectrum
the solid (ref. 101.
parallel
is assigned
deformation
species.
rule this indicates
to
which
in mind
that the
with the carbon axis parallel
is, by contrast,
infrared
to the molecular
surface
somewhat
active modes parallel axis (e').
is a strong indication
to the metal
(e)) are
Bearing
oriented.
but-2-yne
axis (a,") and perpendicular
axis remains
methyl
adsorbed
Again we expect
fact only the e' modes are observed molecular
into two
axis (al) and perpendicular
are not oriented
they are probably
that the
state will be
active modes divide
(al) and the asymmetric
selection
adsorbed
plus
that strong bands of both type (e.g.
of the physically
of the surface
to the surface;
The infrared
It is notable
in the spectrum
the operation
simpler
parallel
axis (e).
(b) Chemisorbed
Here we must remind ourselves
in the physically
as for the free molecule.
sets with dipoles
propyne;
In
that the
in the physisorbed
in Table 5 by reference
to the spectrum
of
415 TABLE 4 Assignment
of the Physically
Propyne/CuIlll)
Physically* Adsorbed
Symmetry (C,,) point group)
Mode VI,
Adsorbed
vu
'a* VCHa(asymJ
Spectrum.
Gas
(ref. 9)
a1
3271
3305
e
29S7
2?71
v2*
‘CH3(sym)
al
2933
2941
2v7
2 x KH3(,sym)
a 1e
2870
2867
"3, vcc
ai
2118
2141
'73 'CH3(asym)
e
1440
1448
“49
dCH3(Sym)
a1
1370
1382
"8~
pCH3
e
1039
1035
* the bands due to the chemisorbed listed here.
species
remain in the spectrum
but are not
1%
g/+rl-1 Fig. 9 RAIRS spectra of (a) Chemisorbed physically adsorbed layer.
but-2-yne;
(b)-(d) Growth
of
416 We have observed physically attempt
adsorbed
difference
layers of propyne
to explain.
lack of permanent
an interesting
in the structure
and but-2-yne
It is likely to be related
dipole moment
but one could easily
which we shall not
to the higher
of the but-2-yne
use these properties
of the
molecule
to rationalize
symetry
compared
and
to propyne
the reverse
observation. At this point it is worth vibrational appear
spectra
to be a routine exercise
For the surface
scientist
such vibrational infrared science
TABLE
‘7, ‘113
to spectroscopists
working
it has only very recently
is rapidly
becoming
would
with bulk phases.
become
possible
resolution.
as important
of the
it provides
to record
Conseouently
a tool in surface
5 of the physically
adsorbed
but-2-yne/Cu(llll
VCH3(asym) “”
spectrum.
Physically* Adsorbed
Symmetry (DsV1 point group)
Solid
2963
e-
3 ( syml
(ref. 101 2963
a 2"
2922
e'
1443
1442
+ ‘16
e' + e"
1416
1414
GCH3(sym)
aq"
'10 GCHa(asym) vll
and the information
spectra with a few wavenumbers
spectroscopy
Mode
v63
alkynes
as it has been in the study of bulk phases.
Assignment
‘99
noting that the above analysis
of adsorbed
1363 1041
e'
PCH3(sym)
* the bands due to the chemisorbed listed here.
Hydrogen
atoms adsorbed
As a final example
species
remain in the spectrum
but are not
on Cu(ll1) to illustrate
the highest
achieved
by our apparatus
hydrogen
atoms at 91 K is shown in Fig. 10.
atoms since adsorption
1040
the spectrum
of molecular
too slow at temperatures
of a Cu(ll1)
hydrogen
sufficiently
sensitivity surface
It is necessary on copper
low to maintain
currently
saturated
with
to use hydrogen
is activated a monolayer
and is
in ultra
high vacuum. Firstly on the Cuflll)
it should be noted that for an adatom surface,
atoms or bridging infrared
such as on-top of one metal atom, bridging
three metal atoms,
active according
sytnnetric metal-hydrogen
in any high-symmetry
only one vibrational
to the metal stretch
surface
or vibration
selection
two metal
mode will be rule, i.e. the
of the adatom against
site
the
417
2xM
Y\
iHs M
M
M
f
I
1200
900
U/cd Fig. 10
RAIRS
surface.
spectra
of hydrogen
We see two bands in a region characteristic
two metal atoms
(- 900 - 1100 cm-')
result obtained
with
(ref.
12)
infrared
where Chabal stretch
metal-hydrogen
deformation.
of the overtone stretch.
always allowed
by the metal
selection
of coupling rule.
on Cuflll).
of hydrogen
This is analogous
for hydrogen
the lower frequency
and the higher
metal-hydrogen
capability
(ref. 11).
spectroscopy
assigned
metal-hydrogen
appearance
atoms chemisorbed
frequency
chemisorbed
are totally selection
with fundamentals
on W(100)
band to an overtone
as the result of Fermi
surface
to the
band to the symmetric
We adopt the same assignment
Overtones
bridging
resonance
symmetric
of the
and we explain
the
with the
and as such are
rule and will always
which are allowed
have the
by the surface
418 The strongest was achieved
that the hydrogen the stretching adsorbed
band in this spectrum
by accumulating is bridging
frequency
two metal
is unexpected
has recently
been a theoretical
since other examples
analysis
frequencies
which concludes
frequencies
obtained
from cluster
chemisorbed
hydrogen
(ref.
of adsorbed
that the characteristic
12).
compounds Based
(ref.
layer,
based on
of hydrogen
hydrogen
in a three-fold
hydrogen hydride
site.
There
vibrational
stretching
11) are not transferable
in this theoretical
of 1045 cm-l for the metal-hydrogen
chemisorbed elsewhere
The conclusion
atoms in the adsorhed
(111) surfaces place hydrogen in three-fold bridging sites.
on
frequency
is < 0.05% and the low noise level
4DilO scans at A cm-l resolution.
analysis
stretch would place This question
to
the
the
is discussed
further
(ref. 14).
CONCLUSXDN The above examples as a major further
analytical
improvements
will be extended
show that infrared
tool in surface in sensitivity
spectroscopy
science.
may now take its place
It is to be expected
will follow and that the spectral
down to about 200 cm-l by use of more specialised
that range
photon
detectors. Another reactions
important
at surfaces
area for the future will be the use of RAIRS to monitor and to detect
this kind of study are discussed
short-lived
elsewhere
intermediates.
Prospects
for
(ref. 151.
REFERENCES
1 2 3
6" 7 8 9
:': 12 13 14 15.
M.A. Chesters, J. Pritchard and M.L. Sims, J. Chem. Sot., Chem. Con. (1970) 1454. K. Horn and J. Pritchard, Surface Sci. 52 (1975) 437. B.E. Hayden, K. Prince, D.B. Woodruff and A.M. Bradshaw, Surface Sci., 133 (1983) 589.R. Ryberg, Surface Sci., 114 (1982) 627. M.A. Chesters, J. Electron Spectrosc. & Related Phenom. 38 (19861 123. R.G. Greenler, J. Chem. Phys. 44 (19661 310 and J. Vat. Sci. Technol. 12 (19751, 1410. M.D. Baker and M.A. Chesters in: R. Caudano, J.-M. Gilles and A.A. Lucas (Eds.), Vibrations at Surfaces, Plenum, New York 1982. B.J. Bandy, M.A. Chesters, M.E. Pemble, G.S. McDougall and N. Sheppard, Surface Sci., 139 (19841, 87. 6. Herzberg, Infrared and Raman Spectra of Polyatomic Molecules, Von Nostrand, New York. 1945. M.A. Chesters and E.M. McCash, in preparation. U.A. Javasooriva. M.A. Chesters. M-W. Howard. S.F.A. Kettle. D.R. Powell and N. Sheppard,d,Surface Sci. 93 (19801, 526: Y. J. Chabal, Phys. Rev. Lett., 55 (19851, 845. Peter J. Feibelman and D.R. Hamann, J. Vat. Sci. Technol. A5 (19871, 474. M.A. Chesters, E.M. McCash, S.F. Parker and J. Pritchard, in preparation. D.H. Chenery, M.A. Chesters and E.M. McCash, submitted to Surface Science.