Adv. SpaceRes. Vol.
6. Noi 1{~,pp. 83-87, 1986 Printed in Great Britain. All righls reserved.
0273-1177/86 $[}.[~} + 15{) Copyright @ C O S P A R
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOLAR CONSTANT AND UPPER TROPOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE VARIATIONS Zs. I. Pint6r Department of Astronomy, E6tv6s University H-1083, Budapest, Kun B~la t?r 2, Hungary
ABSTRACT The relationship solar constant
between
the upper tropospheric
variability
was examined
stant data and balloon data measured first examination
1980,
variation
and
at different
heights
in Budapest.
The
was performed with the help of the refined form of super-
posed epoch method. variations
temperature
on the basis of SMM/ACRIM solar con-
According
to the preliminary
of short timescales
that is why vaster statistical
made with self developed
results the solar constant
can be traced in the upper troposphere
programs
during
study is going on. All statistics
on the University's
are
OS/VS System.
INTRODUCTION The physical
condition
of the terrestrial
atmosphere
is determined
first line by the energy emitted by the Sun, which influences cal processes
too.
ferent timescales
Consequently
variations
and wavelengths
in the
the atmospheri-
of the solar energy flux on dif-
can modify the condition
of the atmosphere.
One of the most direct effects can be supposed between the solar activity the temperature solar activity have
of different parameters
atmospheric
already been investigated
istical methods onstratable
using various
connections
layers.
and the temperature
Relationships
of different
by more researchers
indicators
between
atmospheric
the layers
(2,3) with different
of the solar activity,
and
stat-
and some dem-
were found.
OBSERVATIONS
From the beginning hio h accuracy, mit measurement
of 1980 it is possible
results
of this satellite
from the 16 February
the short variations
tenths of a percent were detected magnitude
to obtain solar constant
for the Solar Haximum Mission
of few hundredth
1980.
Evaluating
of solar constant
the data series
of order of few
component
of three layers of upper troposphere 83
trend of a
(4). This paper
short timescale
values of
began to trans-
well as a slow decreasing
of a percent per year
the effects of the above mentioned on the temperature
as
(SHH) satellite
investigates
of the variation
during
1980.
These
84
Zs. I. Pint6r
short
variations
atmosphere,
o~ the solar constant,
can be probably
Earth's
surface,
because
rapidly
i.e. with
better
these
smaller
:
~'
•
."
"~
~I.._
--
."
:.
more distant
to the outer
influences
..
.
"
~
"
:I':
"
. . . . . . . . . . . TIME {DRYS) ~IIE+2
T20 ~LrVIRTIEN
•~
I
#...
in the layers
response
°
• :1
FI,04
traced
give
detectable
inertia.
,] m_~l
i~ they are really
",* ~
.
~. °
:..T,
÷
TIME (DAfS] ~1£~2
-
7= +
*•+
÷÷
%
,e
°
÷
• TIME {OlaYS) EIE+2
FI.02
TSO DEVIATIgN
Z|.
I
TIME IOBYS) ,IE+2 FI.O|
FiB.
I. FI.Ol
~
shows
by the SMM/ACRIM variations
nEVIRl"[gN
the percentage
radiometer
of t e m p e r a t u r e
can be seen.
(T5O-SO
mbar,
variation
in 1980.
records
of irradiance
On Fl.O2-Fl.O4
at three different
T30-30 mbar,
T2O-2O mbar)
measured
the p e r c e n t a g e height
levels
in the ~rom more
the
Solar Constant and Tropospheric Temperature
For this investigation radiometer
published
1980 ll irradiance period
decreases
the accuracy
can be regarded deviation perature
of the radiometer
of solar constant
different
Physics
height
other parts of Figure changes
by comparison covered
(1368.24
energy,
Meteorological
Service.
are as follows: During
with graphical
levels
data.
it would be necessary too (e.g.
The three
50 mbar,
no valu-
variations averaging.
The of the
layers
can be dis-
to derive un-
from the variations
effect
influencing
The sea-
Though
but the majority degree
it is impossible
to take into account
values
interpolation.)
the investigated
winds)
30 mbar,
levels will be de-
in various
of different
perturbations
disturbances,
tion of these temperature
Naturally
besides
Institute
in the same time interval.
decreases
fluctuations
because
The tem-
19BO the daily
they de not match in details,
and indirect
Wm-2).
of the Central
show the percentage
solar constant
the temperature
other direct
processes
shows the percentage
have been taken into account with seasonal of the diagrams
During
In this
(Only in very few cases occurred
to be replaced
among the temperature
Moreover
1 (FI.OI)
to the above mentioned
at the three different
of the incident merous
Figure
T20, respectively).
1 (FI.O2-F1.04)
of the above mentioned ambigously
by this instrument.
about their mean
at noon were chosen.
by SMM/ACRIM
was so high that all of these decreases
of the Hungarian
needed
provided
485 and 489 (1985).
from balloon measurements
(data series corresponding
temperatures
Report
levels of the measurements
able measurements
sonal
(4).
values
noted further with TSO, T30, of the launch
data were
have been detected
as a real signal
data were obtained
for Atmospheric 20 mbar
the solar constant
in SGD Comprehensive
85
there
are nu-
the atmosphere.
a lot of meteorological
as well as the geographical
limita-
data series.
RESULTS FROM THE SUPERPDSED EPOCH METHOD The existence
of any detectable
posed epoch method
(further
time of the maximal columns
was carried
the keydays
(1) are plotted resultant
on Figure
of the temperatures
corresponding
the minimum
time of the temperature
level
of 30 mbar
this relationship connection
(measured
height
corresponds
More investigations
ferently
in summer
(3).
show the resultant noticed
curves
above at 20 mbar
also can be revealed (30 mbar) plots
a small
relates
of winter
of the results
showed
of the middle
dif-
into column
and of the same character,
The temperature
relationship
show that the
too, behave
As it can be seen the relationship
dip can be suspected.
the summer epochs.
significance
epochs.
The plots
at the level of 30 mbar.
time shifted
At the
So the epochs were divided
is mere conspicuous
firmly
as if the above mentioned The
periods
the above consideration.
On the
while as at the lowest
so doesthe temperature
and winter
levels.
the keyday.
parameters of the atmosphere, according
by SMM/
at the level of 20 mbar,
physical
two groups
19
above it the resultant
is only suspectable
can be seen.
by the
using
2, on the left side column
the different
relationship
where
level no detectable
The results
decreases
curve can be seen,
basis of the plots one can discover
out with the super-
have been appointed
of the solar constant.
At the bottom of ll solar constant
ACRIM in 1980) derived curves
SEM),
decreases
in the method
of diagrams.
relationship
At the lowest
and
level
The right side column
curves
of
sho~v noise character,
disappeared. by the plots of Figure
2 can be tea-
86
Zs. I. Pintdr
_I"
÷
÷ m.t
o~Y~ ~
~
MINIMUM
DRYS F R ~ SMM MINIMUM F'2.0S T~O VINTIm E/mSO4S
DRYS FRGM SMM MINIMUM F2.12 T~n ~
I
_I-
~"
I
~_I.
-.IDRYS FROM ~ MINIMUM F"2.O~ T~O RLL B'~tN~
DAYS FR@M 5MM MINIMUM F2.11 T ~ ~ EPgCMS
DRYS ~ SMM MINIMUM F2J TM ~ VlNY'B~
If. Nil.
,,~Ys
F2.02 ~
~R~ Ms ~ M,NIMUM FILL E ~
,,*
r
!,t
ORY5 FRBM SMM MINIMUM ~o 10 'r~ SUMRER E ~ N S
ORYS FRBM SMM MINIMUM
If.
9
9
ma
m~
~J
~.~-Mmm .L~m ~ =.n 1.411 ORYS FRgM SP~ MINIMUM
~Y5 FRBM SMM MINIMUM F2.@I ~ RLL FP@~H~
Fig.
2. The results of superposed
are presented middle plots
on the figure. (F2.05-F2.08)
summer epochs. September
(F2.01-F2.04)
Summer period is defined between
B April
(F2.09-F2.12) 1980 and 23
analysis of the row samples
in all of the plotcolumns
from the top to the bottom T20, T]O,
soned with the method proposed by Ambroz
(I).
The persistence
as an average behaviour.
by the linear correlation
are as
TSO, SMM flux.
can be regarded be measured
show all epochs,
winter epochs and right plots
parameters
MINIMUM
epochs analysis using 19 columns
Left plots
1980 on the basis of correlation
in SEM.The presented follows:
DRY5 FReM ~
I='2.0@ .gWMM~flqL~ L~O'~
Thus the resulted
coefficient
plots of SEM
in the samples will
R i between
an individual
Solar Constant and Tropospheric Temperature sample belonging
to a
cance of the resultant probability
(i.e.
given
epoch and the resultant
curve can be characterized
frequency
of occurrence
given by the ratio of number of sampies epochs analysed.
Rc, the critical
If the empirical
probabiiity
to be confirmed.
of statistical
correlation
to determine in which
with two different
numbers of coiumns
Table
the largest
I. Values of empiricai
columns
empirical
which
by the
as significant.
than 0.5 the relationship
upon the number of columns
time interval
values of col-
in the neighbour-
EP vaiue is achieved.
Values
used in SEM can be seen in Table
probability
is
number of
is determined
of SEM with different
the optimum
hood ol the keyday
resuits)
coefficient,
EP) is greater
application
So the signifi-
mo-ca~ed
can be considered
For EP may differ depending
used in SEM, by the repeated umns it is possible
(further
curve.
with the
for which R ~ R c to the total
lower range of that R i for which the samples turns
87
(EP) with two different
of EP I.
numbers
of
used in SEM
Epochs
Parameter
EP(19 columns)
EP(11 columns)
ALL
T50 T30 T20 SMM f l u x
0.5 0.6 0.6 1
0.67 0.67 O.B 1
WINTER
TSO T30 T20 SMM f l u x
0.8 O.? D.B 1
0.83 0.9 0.9 1
SUMMER
T5O T30 T20 SMM f l u x
0.6 0.8 0.8 1
0.9 i 0.8 0.83
CONCLUSIONS According between
to the results
the temperature
30 mbar)
and the
preliminary
described variations
variations
character,
Institute making
Though
Physics
the temperature
has been found layers
these results
of short timescale
the heat transfer
(20 mbar, are of
can contribute
in the atmosphere.
The author would like to express
for Atmospheric
available
of two upper tropospheric
of solar constant.
such investigations
usefully to the understanding Acknowledgements.
in this paper relationship
of the Hungarian
his gratitude
to the Central
Meteorological
Service for
data as well as to Dr. Judit Pap for her use-
ful comments.
REFERENCES I.
P.Ambroz, S t a t i s t i c a l method of superposition of I n s t i t u t e of Czechoslovakia, 30, 114 (1979)
epochs, B u l l . of Astron.
2. R.G.Currie, Solar cycle signal in surface air temperature, Journal of Geophysical Research, 79, 5657 (1974) 3. H.Schwentek and W.Elling, Increase in the response of the Earth's atmosphere to the sunspot cycle with height above sea level, Solar Physics , 74, 355 (1981) 4. R.C.Willson, Measurements of solar total irradiance and its variability, Space Science Reviews, 38,203 (1984)