Removal of silver nanoparticles by coagulation processes

Removal of silver nanoparticles by coagulation processes

Accepted Manuscript Title: Removal of Silver Nanoparticles by Coagulation Processes Author: Qian Sun Yan Li Ting Tang Zhihua Yuan Chang-Ping YuQian Su...

929KB Sizes 2 Downloads 243 Views

Accepted Manuscript Title: Removal of Silver Nanoparticles by Coagulation Processes Author: Qian Sun Yan Li Ting Tang Zhihua Yuan Chang-Ping YuQian Sun and Yan Li contributed equally to this work. PII: DOI: Reference:

S0304-3894(13)00545-1 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.07.066 HAZMAT 15291

To appear in:

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:

19-2-2013 22-7-2013 27-7-2013

Please cite this article as: Q. Sun, Y. Li, T. Tang, Z. Yuan, C.-P. Yu, Removal of Silver Nanoparticles by Coagulation Processes, Journal of Hazardous Materials (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.07.066 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Removal of Silver Nanoparticles by Coagulation Processes

1

ip t

2

3

Qian Sun1+, Yan Li1+, Ting Tang1,2, Zhihua Yuan1, Chang-Ping Yu1,*

us

cr

4

5

6

1

7

Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China

8

2

9

Huainan 232001, China

14 15 16

an

M

d Ac ce p

11

13

College of Earth and Environment, Anhui University of Science & Technology,

te

10

12

Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment,

+

Qian Sun and Yan Li contributed equally to this work.

* Corresponding Author: Tel: (86)-592-6190768, Email: [email protected]

1

Page 1 of 31

ABSTRACT

17

Commercial use of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) will lead to a potential route for

18

human exposure via potable water. Coagulation followed by sedimentation, as a

19

conventional technique in the drinking water treatment facilities, may become an

20

important barrier to prevent human from AgNP exposures. This study investigated the

21

removal of AgNP suspensions by four regular coagulants. In the aluminum sulfate and

22

ferric chloride coagulation systems, the water parameters slightly affected the AgNP

23

removal. However, in the poly aluminum chloride and polyferric sulfate coagulation

24

systems, the optimal removal efficiencies were achieved at pH 7.5, while higher or

25

lower of pH could reduce the AgNP removal. Besides, the increasing natural organic

26

matter (NOM) would reduce the AgNP removal, while Ca2+ and suspended solids

27

concentrations would also affect the AgNP removal. In addition, results from the

28

transmission electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction showed AgNPs or

29

silver-containing nanoparticles were adsorbed onto the flocs. Finally, natural water

31 32 33

cr

us

an

M

d

te

Ac ce p

30

ip t

16

samples were used to validate AgNP removal by coagulation. This study suggests that in the case of release of AgNPs into the source water, the traditional water treatment process, coagulation/ sedimentation, can remove AgNPs and minimize the silver ion concentration under the well optimized conditions.

34 35

Keyword: Silver nanoparticles; Coagulation; Removal efficiency; Flocs; Silver ion

36

release

37

2

Page 2 of 31

38

1. Introduction Nanoparticles (NPs) are defined as materials with at least one dimension less than

40

100 nm. Because of the unique antimicrobial properties, silver NPs (AgNPs) are one

41

of the most widely used NPs in a range of consumer goods such as food packaging,

42

clothing, medical devices, and cleaning agents. The worldwide production of AgNPs

43

was approximately 500 tons/year (2008), [1], and the widespread use inevitably leads

44

to AgNP release into the environment [2]. Concerns have been raised about potential

45

adverse effects of AgNPs on human health and the environment [3] Evidences have

46

shown that AgNPs are toxic to cells [4], bacteria [5,6], algae [7], and other aquatic

47

organisms [8]. Furthermore, there is also a risk that the use of AgNPs will lead to the

48

development of antibiotic resistance among harmful bacteria [9], and may also

49

damage or alter beneficial microbial communities [10].

51 52 53 54 55

cr

us

an

M

d

te

AgNPs can be diminished by aggregation in the aquatic environment. These

Ac ce p

50

ip t

39

processes are governed by the physicochemical properties of AgNPs, including size and surface charge, and are directly influenced by the solution condition, such as pH, natural organic matter (NOM), and ionic strength [11]. AgNPs appeared to agglomerate under acidic conditions or higher ionic strength, especially higher concentrations of divalent electrolytes [11-14]. For example, Ca2+ concentrations

56

above 2 mM would enhance AgNP agglomeration [11]. However, the interactions of

57

AgNPs with NOM are still not clear. Greater stability of citrate and PVP-coated

58

AgNPs were observed in the presence of humic substances [11], while a negligible

59

effect of aquatic fulvic acid was found on the agglomeration state of uncoated AgNPs 3

Page 3 of 31

[13]. Besides, the capping agents, which are used in the synthesis of NPs to prevent

61

aggregation, may affect the stability of AgNPs [12]. In addition, AgNPs can be

62

reduced by silver ion releasing into the aquatic environment. Previous study showed

63

that more than 10% of silver ions were released from citrate coated AgNPs (2 mg/L)

64

in the air-saturated water at pH 5.6 [15]. The silver ion releasing rates increased with

65

temperature, and decreased with increasing pH or addition of NOM [15].

us

cr

ip t

60

AgNPs present in aquatic systems may represent a possible route for human

67

exposure, especially if the AgNPs-contaminated aquatic system is used as the source

68

of potable water. Coagulation, which is one of the most common processes for the

69

water treatment to removal particles and NOM, provides a potential way to remove

70

AgNPs or other engineered NPs. However, the related study received few attentions

71

to date. Previous studies demonstrated the removal of CdTe NPs and C60 NPs by alum

72

[16,17], and reported that multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) could be removed

73

from aquatic system via coagulation [18]. Metal oxide NPs, including Fe2O3, ZnO,

77

Ac ce p

te

d

M

an

66

78

However, the performance of AgNP removal by coagulation has not been fully

79

investigated. Moreover, the removal mechanism would be more complicated, since

80

AgNPs could keep releasing silver ion in the aquatic system, which would partly

81

cause the toxicity of AgNPs [10].

74 75 76

TiO2, NiO and silica, were also reported to be partially removed by coagulants [19]. These studies have shown that NPs could be removed through coagulation but the removal efficiency varied significantly and was dependent on the NP types, coagulant types, and other aqueous conditions, such as pH, NOM and suspended solids.

4

Page 4 of 31

The present study attempts to fill this knowledge gap by investigating the

83

removal efficiencies of AgNPs by coagulation and elucidating the mechanism.

84

Considering AgNPs could keep releasing silver ion, the removal efficiencies were

85

evaluated by determining both silver ion concentrations and total silver concentrations

86

in the aquatic phase. Four regular coagulants, including aluminum sulfate, ferric

87

chloride, poly aluminum chloride (PACl) and polyferric sulfate (PFS), were applied to

88

investigate the effect of coagulant types on AgNP removal. Besides, different aqueous

89

conditions, including pH, NOM, cation concentration, and suspended solids

90

concentration, were investigated. Furthermore, the coagulation flocs were

91

characterized for better understanding of removal mechanism. Finally, natural water

92

samples were carried out for the validation of AgNP removal by coagulation.

93

2. Material and methods

94

2.1. AgNP synthesis

96 97 98

cr

us

an

M

d

te

Ac ce p

95

ip t

82

AgNPs were synthesized from AgNO3 by adding NaBH4 with polyvinyl alcohol

(PVA) as a capping agent [6]. 5 mL of 14 mM NaBH4 was added into 90 mL 0.06% (wt) PVA solution. Afterwards, 5 mL of 14 mM AgNO3 was injected at the rate of one drop per sec. Following 10 min of 700 rpm stirring at room temperature, AgNPs were

99

concentrated and purified by centrifugal ultrafiltration (Millipore, Amicon Ultra-15 3

100

K, USA), rinsed twice with Milli-Q water (Millipore, 18.2 MΩ·cm, USA). Initial

101

physic-chemical characterization was performed after the synthesis. AgNP stock

102

suspensions were stored at 4 °C before use. No aggregation during storage was

5

Page 5 of 31

103

observed.

104

2.2. AgNP characterization The particle size and morphology of AgNPs were determined by transmission

106

electron microscopy (TEM) at 100 kV (Hitachi, H7650, Japan). Samples were

107

prepared by placing a drop of fresh suspension on the TEM copper grids, followed by

108

solvent evaporation at room temperature overnight. Fig. S1 shows the morphology,

109

size distribution and stability of the AgNPs used in this study. The TEM micrograph

110

(SI Fig. S1a) shows that AgNPs are spherical in shape and well-dispersed. The size

111

distribution was evaluated by software Image J. Fig. S1a shows the size distribution

112

of AgNPs, with an average diameter of 12.1 nm.

M

an

us

cr

ip t

105

The UV-Vis spectra from 300-700 nm were obtained using an UV-Vis

114

spectrophotometer (Shanghai Metash, UV-5200, China). Fig. S1b shows the silver

115

surface plasmon absorption band with a maximum at 393.5 nm. The crystallography

117 118 119

te

Ac ce p

116

d

113

of AgNPs was determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) (PANalytical, X’ Pert Pro, Netherlands) operated at a voltage of 40 kV and a current of 30 mA with Cu Kα radiation. Fig. S1c show Bragg reflections with 2θ values of 38.0, 44.2, 64.3 and 77.3°, indicating the (111), (200), (220) and (311) crystal planes of the face-centered-cubic

120

phase of synthesized AgNPs, respectively.

121

2.3. Jar test

122

Coagulation experiments were performed in 500 mL glass beakers on a

123

conventional jar test apparatus using a six-paddle stirrer (Jiamei Instruments, Jintan, 6

Page 6 of 31

China). Before dosing, AgNP stock suspensions were diluted to 1 mg/L with borate

125

buffer (5 mM, pH 8.4) to reduce the releasing of silver ion [15]. pH, NOM

126

concentration, calcium concentration, or kaolin concentration were adjusted to a

127

certain concentration. Four coagulants, including aluminum sulfate, ferric chloride,

128

PACl and PFS, were individually added into each 500 mL AgNP suspension (1.0 mg

129

Ag/L) to test the efficiency of AgNP removal. The dosages of aluminum sulfate, PACl,

130

ferric chloride and PFS were predetermined based on the minimum quantity of

131

coagulants to produce flocs, as described in detail in Supplementary Information (SI).

132

The applied dosages for aluminum sulfate, ferric chloride, PACl, and PFS were 495,

133

400, 30, and 47 mg/L, respectively. The jar test procedures consisted of a 2.0 min

134

rapid mix (300 rpm), a 10 min slow mix (60 rpm), and a 20 min settling period. A

135

small amount of samples was taken immediately after 1.0 min rapid mix to measure

136

the zeta potential by Zetasizer (Malvern Instruments, ZetaPALS, U.K.). After settling,

137

the supernatants were carefully collected to analyze the concentrations of AgNPs and

141

Ac ce p

te

d

M

an

us

cr

ip t

124

142

Milli-Q water, where the solution pH was adjusted to alkaline condition to enhance

143

the dissolution. The stock solutions were then filtered (Millipore, 0.45 µm, USA), and

144

the total organic carbon (TOC) of the stock solution was determined by TOC analyzer

145

(TOC-V CPH, Shimadzu, Japan). The kaolin stock suspension was prepared to study

138 139 140

silver ion.

The suspension pH was adjusted by adding 1 M HNO3 or NaOH. Suwannee

River humic acid (HA) (Sigma-Aldrich) solution was prepared to represent NOM in the water. HA stock solution of 1 g/L were prepared by dissolving the HA powder in

7

Page 7 of 31

the effect of suspended solids on the removal of AgNPs. All the coagulation

147

experiments were performed in triplicate.

148

2.4. Floc characterization

ip t

146

After finishing the jar test for determining the effect of pH on AgNP removal,

150

flocs were immediately collected from beakers after the sedimentation. Floc samples

151

were vacuum-dried at 40 oC and gently grounded with mortar and pestle. The powders

152

were resuspended in Milli-Q water. The morphology of the flocs was analyzed by

153

TEM analysis, and the crystal structure of the flocs was identified by XRD analysis.

154

2.5. Silver speciation and determination

M

an

us

cr

149

The quantification of AgNP stock suspensions was analyzed by inductively

156

coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (PerkinElmer Optima 7000 DV, USA)

157

after nitric acid digestion. The AgNP concentrations in the stock suspension were in

158

the range of 100-120 mg/L. Silver concentrations in the coagulation solution were

160 161 162

te

Ac ce p

159

d

155

analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (Agilent 7500cx, USA). The dissolved silver ion was isolated by removing AgNPs using centrifugal ultrafilter devices (Millipore Amicon Ultra-4 3 K, USA), subjected to centrifugation for 30 min at 4000 rpm [15], while the total silver concentration was analyzed after nitric acid

163

digestion. The AgNP concentration was calculated by deducting dissolved silver ion

164

from total silver.

165

2.6. Water sample collections

166

Ten L of grab samples were collected in Oct, 2012 from a local source water 8

Page 8 of 31

reservoir (Fujian Province, China). Samples were transported in ice-packed coolers to

168

the laboratory and stored at 4 oC. Sample was characterized and the physicochemical

169

parameters are described in SI Table S1.

170

3. Results and discussion

171

3.1. Effect of pH on AgNP removal

cr

ip t

167

In this study, zeta potentials of 1.0 mg/L PVA coated AgNP suspension at pH 6.5,

173

7.5 and 8.5 were -7.3, -9.4 and -18.2 mV, indicating a destabilization of AgNPs at

174

lower pH. The measurement agreed with a previous study, which observed that the

175

agglomeration was enhanced with lower pH due to the less negative zeta potential

176

[11,12]. Coagulation at different pH values was carried out in the jar test to investigate

177

the effect of pH on AgNP removal (Fig. 1a). AgNP removal efficiencies increased as

178

pH increased from 6.5 to 7.5, and decreased as pH increased to 8.5. Especially using

179

PFS and PACl as coagulants, the removal efficiencies by PFS were 16, 76 and 15% at

180

pH value 6.5, 7.5, 8.5, while the removal efficiencies by PACl were about 4, 90 and

184

Ac ce p

te

d

M

an

us

172

185

pH values for all the four coagulants. In aluminum sulfate system, the zeta potentials

186

were 8.5, 5.4 and -1.1 mV at pH 6.5, 7.5 and 8.5. Compared with AgNP suspensions

187

without coagulants, zeta potentials of AgNP suspensions became less negative (pH 8.5)

188

or positive (pH 6.5 and 7.5) in the presence of coagulants, indicating the AgNP

181 182 183

73% respectively. The optimized pH at 7.5 was selected for all the four coagulants in the following study.

Zeta potential was measured immediately after 1 min rapid mixing. As shown in

Fig. 1b, an increase in the measured zeta potentials was observed due to a decrease in

9

Page 9 of 31

removal was partly attributed to the charge neutralization, where the cationic

190

aluminum or iron hydrolysis products would be strongly adsorbed on the negative

191

AgNPs and effective destabilization was achieved [20]. Similar removal mechanism

192

was also observed for ferric chloride (at pH 7.5 and 8.5), PACl (at pH 7.5 and 8.5),

193

and PFS (at pH 7.5). However, more positive zeta potentials were measured for ferric

194

chloride and PACl at pH 6.5, while a more negative zeta potential was measured for

195

PFS at pH 8.5. Generally, a suspension that exhibits an absolute zeta potential less

196

than 20 mV is considered unstable and will result in precipitation of particles in

197

solution [12], while the absolute zeta potential higher than 20 mV is stable. The higher

198

absolute zeta potential for PACl at pH 6.5 or PFS at 8.5 would explain the insufficient

199

removal of AgNPs, since the particles were stable due to the surface charge. However,

200

the good removal of AgNPs by ferric chloride at pH 6.5 suggested that other

201

mechanism of coagulation might be involved.

202

3.2. Effect of NOM on AgNP removal

204 205 206

cr

us

an

M

d

te

Ac ce p

203

ip t

189

In this study, different concentrations of NOM were chosen according to reported

surface water TOC [21]. Zeta potential of AgNPs with concentration of 1.0 mg/L at pH 7.5 was -9.4 mV, and it decreased to -32.7 mV while 20 mg TOC/L NOM was added, indicating greater stability of AgNPs in the presence of humic substances,

207

likely because NOM imparted negative charge to AgNP surface and increased the

208

absolute surface potential [22], or the addition of NOM in the suspension decreased

209

the zeta potential.

210

The effect of NOM on the AgNP removal is shown in Fig. 2. The removal

10

Page 10 of 31

efficiencies using aluminum sulfate and ferric chloride reduced slightly as the NOM

212

concentration increased. However, the removal rates by PACl were 90, 57 and 19%

213

with the NOM concentrations of 0, 5 and 20 mg/L, respectively, while the removal

214

rates by PFS were 76, 37 and 19%. The lower AgNP removal efficiencies were

215

probably because NOM may consume part of the coagulant due to the preferential

216

interaction between NOM and the coagulants [17,19,23]. The AgNP removal

217

efficiency increased to 92.9% and 95.6% as the dosages of PFS and PACl increased to

218

five times, indicating the increase in the coagulant dosages would obtained the higher

219

removal efficiency.

220

3.3. Effect of cation ion on AgNP removal

M

an

us

cr

ip t

211

The zeta potentials of AgNP suspensions at pH 7.5 with Ca2+ concentrations of 0,

222

1, and 10 mM were -9.4, -5.4, and -1.9 mV, respectively. The negative surface charge

223

of AgNPs approached zero with increasing Ca2+ concentrations, indicating the

224

destabilization of AgNPs would be enhanced under higher Ca2+ ion strength. The

226 227 228

te

Ac ce p

225

d

221

electrical double-layer on the AgNP surface is strongly compressed by Ca2+ and zeta potential approaches zero [11], and agglomeration of AgNPs was reported to be enhanced by the Ca2+ [11-13]. In addition, the previous study has also demonstrated the effect of Ca2+ on the coagulation performance [24]. The AgNP removal

229

efficiencies at various Ca2+ concentrations during the coagulation process are shown

230

in Fig. 3a. In the aluminum sulfate and PACl coagulation systems, AgNP removal

231

efficiencies decreased as Ca2+ concentrations increased. This is probably due to the

232

increase of zeta potential to enhance AgNP stability (Fig. 3b) but will need further

11

Page 11 of 31

experiments for confirmation. In PFS coagulation system, AgNP removal efficiency

234

slightly increased as Ca2+ concentrations increased. The increase of zeta potential

235

from negative to around zero as Ca2+ concentrations increased from 0 to 1 and 10 mM,

236

could consequently reduce the AgNP stability.

237

3.4. Effect of suspended solids on AgNP removal

cr

ip t

233

AgNP removal efficiencies slightly changed with the addition of kaolin in the

239

aluminum sulfate and ferric chloride system. However, the removal efficiencies

240

improved with higher kaolin concentrations in PACl and PFS coagulation system (Fig.

241

4). Purposeful addition of supplementary particles is often used to improve the

242

coagulation efficiency since the opportunity for particle-particle contact was increased

243

[18,25]. In the PACl and PFS coagulation systems, the addition of kaolin could

244

increase the opportunities for kaolin-AgNPs contact, and consequently, AgNP

245

removal was likely improved by the direct AgNP surface adsorption on the kaolin

246

particle followed by removal via particle destabilization or sweep flocculation.

248 249 250

an

M

d

te

Ac ce p

247

us

238

Similar improved removal efficiency of NPs was reported, where MWCNT removal was enhanced by kaolin in the coagulation process [18]. 3.5. Silver ion releasing

Considering that AgNPs could keep releasing silver ions in the solutions [15,26],

251

which would attribute to AgNP removal, the silver ion release of AgNPs in the

252

coagulation processes was investigated. The silver ion concentrations after

253

coagulation with different pH values are shown in Fig. 5. Higher silver ion

254

concentrations were observed under lower pH value in ferric chloride and PFS

12

Page 12 of 31

systems. Especially for PFS at pH 6.5, the silver ion concentrations were 105 µg/L,

256

which counted for 65% of the AgNP removal. This suggested that the silver ion

257

release was strongly pH dependent, and ion release rates decreased with increasing

258

pH, which was in accordance with the previous study [15].

ip t

255

The silver ion concentrations decreased as NOM concentrations increased (Fig.

260

S2) in the aluminum sulfate and ferric chloride systems. The surface adsorption of

261

NOM onto AgNPs might reduce the silver ion releasing [27]. Besides, NOM in the

262

solution might work as a competitive sink for oxidation compounds which could

263

inhibit the oxidation of AgNPs [28]. The silver ion releasing decreased with addition

264

of humic acids, which was in accordance with previous study [15]. However, in the

265

PACl and PFS system, the highest silver ion concentrations were observed at NOM

266

concentration of 5 mg/L. This might be due to the release of silver ion from the

267

insufficient removal of AgNPs in the solution (Fig. 2). While for 20 mg/L NOM, the

268

silver ion release could be reduced with the addition of NOM [15, 27, 28]. The effects

270 271 272 273

us

an

M

d

te

Ac ce p

269

cr

259

of cationic strength and suspended solids concentration on the silver ion concentrations are shown in Fig. S2b and S2c. The silver ion concentrations had slight variation with Ca2+ concentrations or kaolin concentrations, with an exception of an increasing silver ion concentration observed in PACl and PFS systems with higher concentrations of kaolin.

274

It is worth noting that silver ion concentrations were lower in ferric chloride and

275

PACl systems compared to aluminum sulfate and PFS systems. It was likely due to

276

the formation of AgCl, since the solubility product constant (ksp) of AgCl is quite low

13

Page 13 of 31

(1.56x10-10). Therefore, the ferric chloride and PACl, which could release chloride

278

ions in the solution, were recommended to be the coagulants for the AgNP removal,

279

since they could not only remove AgNPs but also control the silver ion concentrations

280

to reduce the toxicity.

281

3.6. Confirmation of AgNP removal by coagulation

cr

ip t

277

TEM analysis was applied to investigate the microscopic configuration of AgNPs

283

distributed in the flocs (Fig. 6). Black spherical shape spots were absorbed on the light

284

color flocs. The particle sizes were 5-25 nm, which were within the same range of the

285

pristine AgNPs. In contrast, as shown in the TEM images in SI Fig. S3, no such spot

286

was observed in samples without AgNPs (i.e., flocs only). Therefore, the black spots

287

were considered to be the AgNPs or silver-containing NPs.

M

an

us

282

In addition, XRD analysis was applied to further study the chemical form of

289

silver in the coagulation flocs. XRD spectra, with (111), (200), (220) and (311) facets,

290

validate the existence of AgNPs with the crystal structure in the coagulation flocs of

292 293 294

te

Ac ce p

291

d

288

aluminum sulfate, PACl and PFS, as shown in Fig. 7a, 7c, 7d. Therefore, in the aluminum sulfate, PACl, and PFS coagulation systems, the AgNP removal was mainly achieved by adsorption onto the coagulants and sedimentation with the flocs in the form of AgNPs.

295

In the ferric chloride coagulation system, characteristic peaks of the flocs were

296

observed at 27.7, 32.2, and 46.2° (Fig. 7b), indicating the existence of AgCl. Besides,

297

additional peaks at 35.7 and 43.6°, also indicated the existence of Fe2O3, which is

298

likely formed due to the hydrolysis of FeCl3 followed by two-step phase

14

Page 14 of 31

transformation [29]. However, peaks for AgNPs, with (111), (200), (220) and (311)

300

facets, were not observed. This implied AgNPs was mainly removed by release of

301

silver ions in the ferric chloride coagulation system, followed by the formation of

302

AgCl.

303

3.7. AgNP removal by coagulation in the raw water

cr

ip t

299

Raw water from a local reservoir was collected to investigate the removal

305

efficiencies of AgNPs by the coagulation process. The water pH was 7.43, and TOC

306

was 1.53 mg/L. Detail characterization parameters are shown in SI Table S1. Jar tests

307

were carried out by the four coagulants with the solution pH at 7.5. The removal

308

efficiencies are shown in Table 1. The highest removal was achieved by PACl with the

309

removal efficiency close to 100%, followed by the aluminum sulfate with the removal

310

efficiency of 99%. The removal efficiencies by ferric chloride and PFS were 92 and

311

91%, respectively. The results demonstrated that the traditional water treatment

312

process, coagulation and sedimentation could effectively remove AgNPs from the raw

314 315 316

an

M

d

te

Ac ce p

313

us

304

water.

3.8. Environmental implication Incorporation of AgNPs into a wide variety of consumer products has led to

concern due to their unintended release to the aquatic environment. The aggregation,

317

dissolution, chemical transformation, precipitation of AgNPs in the environmental

318

water could limit the transport of AgNPs and lead to the removal of AgNPs before

319

entering the drinking water treatment facility. Even if AgNPs can be transported to the

320

source water and enter the drinking water treatment processes, our results have

15

Page 15 of 31

demonstrated that the traditional treatment process, coagulation/sedimentation, could

322

not only remove AgNPs, but also limit the silver ion to a low level. Therefore, human

323

exposure to AgNPs through potable water could be reduced by the well optimized

324

coagulation process.

ip t

321

4. Conclusions

us

326

cr

325

The removal of AgNPs depends on the coagulant types, dosage and the

328

suspension pH, and the optimum removal efficiencies were achieved at pH 7.5. All

329

the four coagulants could effectively remove AgNPs. However, the ferric chloride and

330

PACl could reduce the silver ion concentrations to a lower level, and these two

331

chloride coagulants were recommended for the AgNP removal. Results from TEM

332

and XRD showed AgNPs or silver-containing nanoparticles were adsorbed onto the

333

flocs. Moreover, the removal efficiencies of AgNPs would be affected by the natural

334

water characteristics, for instance, NOM, cationic strength, and suspended solids

336 337 338

M

d

te

Ac ce p

335

an

327

concentration. Therefore, the coagulation process should be optimized accordingly to provide an effective way for AgNP or other engineered NP removal. Acknowledgements

We appreciate Dr. Xin Yu, and Ms. Zihong Fan for the raw water sample collections.

339

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province,

340

China (2011J05035), the Special Program for Key Basic Research of the Ministry of

341

Science and Technology, China (2010CB434802), the Science and Technology

342

Planning Project of Xiamen, China (3502Z20120012), the Science and Technology

16

Page 16 of 31

Innovation and Collaboration Team Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,

344

Technology Foundation for Selected Overseas Chinese Scholar of MOHRSS, China,

345

and the Hundred Talents Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

346

Reference

347

[1] N.C. Mueller, B. Nowack, Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the

348

environment, Environ. Sci. Technol. 42 (2008) 4447-4453.

349

[2] B. Nowack, Nanosilver revisited downstream, Science 330 (2010) 1054-1055.

350

[3] S.W.P. Wijnhoven, W.J.G.M. Peijnenburg, C.A. Herberts, W.I. Hagens, A.G.

351

Oomen, E.H.W. Heugens, B. Roszek, J. Bisschops, I. Gosens, D. van de Meent, S.

352

Dekkers, W.H. de Jong, M. van Zijverden, A.J.A.M. Sips, R.E. Geertsma,

353

Nano-silver- a review of available data and knowledge gaps in human and

354

environmental risk assessment, Nanotoxicology 3 (2009) 109-U78.

355

[4] C. Carlson, S.M. Hussain, A.M. Schrand, L.K. Braydich-Stolle, K.L. Hess, R.L.

356

Jones, J.J. Schlager, Unique cellular interaction of silver nanoparticles: Size-

358 359 360

cr

us

an

M

d

te

Ac ce p

357

ip t

343

dependent generation of reactive oxygen species, J. Phys. Chem. B 112 (2008) 13608-13619.

[5] Z.M. Xiu, J. Ma, P.J.J. Alvarez, Differential effect of common ligands and molecular oxygen on antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticles versus silver ions,

361

Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 (2011) 9003-9008.

362

[6] O. Choi, C.-P. Yu, G.E. Fernandez, Z. Hu, Interactions of nanosilver with

363

Escherichia coli cells in planktonic and biofilm cultures, Water Res. 44 (2010)

364

6095-6103.

17

Page 17 of 31

[7] A.J. Miao, Z.P. Luo, C.S. Chen, W.C. Chin, P.H. Santschi, A. Quigg, Intracellular

366

uptake: A possible mechanism for silver engineered nanoparticle toxicity to a

367

freshwater alga Ochromonas danica, PLoS One 5 (2010) e15196.

368

[8] H.J. Jo, J.W. Choi, S.H. Lee, S.W. Hong, Acute toxicity of Ag and CuO

369

nanoparticle suspension against Daphnia magna: The importance of their dissolved

370

fraction varying with preparation methods, J. Hazard. Mater. 227 (2012) 301-308.

371

[9] S.S. Khan, E.B. Kumar, A. Mukherjee, N. Chandrasekaran, Bacterial tolerance to

372

silver nanoparticles (SNPs): Aeromonas punctata isolated from sewage environment,

373

J. Basic Microb. 51 (2011) 183-190.

374

[10] Z. Yuan, J. Li, L. Cui, B. Xu, H. Zhang, C.-P. Yu, Interaction of silver

375

nanoparticles with pure nitrifying bacteria, Chemosphere 90 (2013) 1404-1411.

376

[11] F. Piccapietra, L. Sigg, R. Behra, Colloidal stability of carbonate-coated silver

377

nanoparticles in synthetic and natural freshwater, Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (2012)

378

818-825.

380 381 382

cr

us

an

M

d

te

Ac ce p

379

ip t

365

[12] A.M. El Badawy, T.P. Luxton, R.G. Silva, K.G. Scheckel, M.T. Suidan, T.M. Tolaymat, Impact of environmental conditions (pH, ionic strength, and electrolyte type) on the surface charge and aggregation of silver nanoparticles suspensions, Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 (2010) 1260-1266.

383

[13] X.A. Li, J.J. Lenhart, H.W. Walker, Dissolution-accompanied aggregation

384

kinetics of silver nanoparticles, Langmuir 26 (2010) 16690-16698.

385

[14] K.A. Huynh, K.L. Chen, Aggregation kinetics of citrate and polyvinylpyrrolidone

386

coated silver nanoparticles in monovalent and divalent electrolyte solutions, Environ.

18

Page 18 of 31

Sci. Technol. 45 (2011) 5564-5571.

388

[15] J. Liu, R.H. Hurt, Ion release kinetics and particle persistence in aqueous

389

nano-silver colloids, Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 (2010) 2169-2175.

390

[16] Y. Zhang, Y.S. Chen, P. Westerhoff, J.C. Crittenden, Stability and removal of

391

water soluble CdTe quantum dots in water, Environ. Sci. Technol. 42 (2008) 321-325.

392

[17] H. Hyung, J.H. Kim, Dispersion of C-60 in natural water and removal by

393

conventional drinking water treatment processes. Water Res. 43 (2009) 2463-2470.

394

[18] R.D. Holbrook, C.N. Kline, J.J. Filliben, Impact of source water quality on

395

multiwall carbon nanotube coagulation, Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 (2010) 1386-1391.

396

[19] Y. Zhang, Y.S. Chen, P. Westerhoff, K. Hristovski, J.C. Crittenden, Stability of

397

commercial metal oxide nanoparticles in water, Water Res. 42 (2008) 2204-2212.

398

[20] J.M. Duan, J. Gregory, Coagulation by hydrolysing metal salts, Adv. Colloid

399

Interface Sci. 100 (2003) 475-502.

400

[21] T. Ouyang, Z. Zhu, Y. Kuang, River water quaility and pollution sources in the

402 403 404

cr

us

an

M

d

te

Ac ce p

401

ip t

387

Pearl River Delta, China, J. Environ. Monit. 7 (2005) 664-669. [22] Y. Zhang, Y.S. Chen, P. Westerhoff, J. Crittenden, Impact of natural organic matter and divalent cations on the stability of aqueous nanoparticles, Water Res. 43 (2009) 4249-4257.

405

[23] C.R. O'Melia, W.C. Becker, K.K. Au, Removal of humic substances by

406

coagulation, Water Sci. Technol. 40 (1999) 47-54.

407

[24] Y. Wang, B.Y. Gao, X.M. Xu, W.Y. Xu, The effect of total hardness and ionic

408

strength on the coagulation performance and kinetics of aluminum salts to remove

19

Page 19 of 31

humic acid, Chem. Eng. J. 160 (2010) 150-156.

410

[25] W. Stumm, C. R. O'Melia, Stoichiometry of coagulation. J. Am. Water Works Ass.

411

(1968) 60514-60539.

412

[26] W. Zhang, Y. Yao, N. Sullivan, Y.S. Chen, Modeling the primary size effects of

413

citrate-coated silver nanoparticles on their ion release kinetics, Environ. Sci. Technol.

414

45 (2011) 4422-4428.

415

[27] S.T. Dubas, V. Pimpan, Humic acid assisted synthesis of silver nanoparticles and

416

its application to herbicide detection, Mater. Lett. 63 (2008) 2661-2663.

417

[28] G.S. Wan, C.H. Liao, F.J. Wu, Photodegradation of humic acid in the presence of

418

hydrogen peroxide, Chemosphere 42 (2001) 379-387.

419

[29] W.T. Dong, C.S. Zhu, Use of ethylene oxide in the sol-gel synthesis of

420

alpha-Fe2O3 nanoparticles from Fe(III) salts, J. Mater. Chem. 12 (2002) 1676-1683.

cr us

an

M

d

te Ac ce p

421

ip t

409

20

Page 20 of 31

421

Coagulants

Al2(SO4)3

FeCl3

PACl

PFS

Removal Rates (%)

99±1

91±9

100a

ip t

423

Table 1 Removal efficiencies of AgNPs from the raw water by different coagulants

a

Raw water is just enough for one sample.

92±7

cr

422

Ac ce p

te

d

M

an

us

424

21

Page 21 of 31

424

Figure Captions

425

Fig. 1. Effect of pH on the AgNP removal efficiencies (a) and zeta potential (b).

427

Fig. 2. Effect of NOM on the removal efficiencies of AgNPs.

428

Fig. 3. Effect of Ca2+ on the removal efficiencies of AgNPs (a) and zeta potential (b).

429

Fig. 4. Effect of the suspended solids on the AgNP removal.

430

Fig. 5. Effect of pH on the silver ion releasing.

431

Fig. 6. TEM images of flocs by different coagulants: (a) aluminum sulfate; (b) ferric

432

chloride; (c) PACl; (d) PFS.

433

Fig. 7. XRD patterns of flocs by different coagulants: (a) aluminum sulfate; (b) ferric

434

chloride; (c) PACl; and (d) PFS.

cr

us

an

M

d te Ac ce p

435

ip t

426

22

Page 22 of 31

a

100 80 60

ip t

6.5 7.5

40

8.5

0

435

Al2(SO4)3

FeCl3

PACl

30

b

an

10

M

0 -10

-30

437 438

7.5 8.5

Al2(SO4)3

FeCl3

PACl

PFS

Ac ce p

436

6.5

d

-20

te

zeta potential (mV)

20

-40

PFS

cr

20

us

AgNPs removal efficiencies (%)

120

Fig. 1.

23

Page 23 of 31

438 439

ip t

100 80

cr

NOM 0 mg/L

60

NOM 5 mg/L

NOM 20 mg/L

us

40 20 0 Al2(SO4)3

440 Fig. 2.

PACl

PFS

M

441

FeCl3

an

AgNPs removal efficiencies (%)

120

Ac ce p

te

d

442

24

Page 24 of 31

442

a

100

ip t

80

Ca2+ 0 mM

60

cr

Ca2+ 1 mM

40

Ca2+ 10 mM

20 0 FeCl3

PACl

25

M

15

5 0

445 446

Ac ce p

-5

-10

Ca2+ 0 mM Ca2+ 1 mM Ca2+ 10 mM

d

10

b

te

Zeta potential (mV)

20

444

PFS

an

Al2(SO4)3

443

us

AgNPs removal efficiencies (%)

120

Al2(SO4)3

FeCl3

PACl

PFS

Fig. 3.

25

Page 25 of 31

446 447

ip t

100 80

cr

Kaolin 0 mg/L

60

Kaolin 10 mg/L Kaolin 30 mg/L

us

40 20 0 Al2(SO4)3

448 Fig. 4.

PACl

PFS

M

449

FeCl3

an

AgNPs removal efficiencies (%)

120

Ac ce p

te

d

450

26

Page 26 of 31

450

120

80

pH 6.5 60

452

cr

pH 7.5

40

Al2 (SO4 )3

FeCl3

PACl

us

pH 8.5

20 0

451

ip t

100

PFS

an

Silver ion concentraion (µg/L)

140

Fig. 5.

Ac ce p

te

d

M

453

27

Page 27 of 31

454 455 456

Ac ce p

te

d

M

an

us

cr

ip t

453

Fig. 6.

28

Page 28 of 31

60

70

(111)

8000

20

80

c

6000

2000 50

60

70

5500 20

80

60

70

80

d

(200)

30

40

an

40

50

(220)

60

(311)

70

80

o

Position ( 2θ)

Position (o 2θ)

M

456 457

te

d

Fig. 7.

Ac ce p

460

8500

6500

(311)

50

(111)

9000

7000 (220)

30

40

7500

(200)

4000

459

30

8000

6000

3000



8500

7000 5000

b

cr

50

Fe2O3

us

Counts

(311) 40

AgCl



9000

(220)

30



○ ▲

2000

458



(200)

3000

1000 20

○○

9500

4000

1000 20

10000

ip t

5000

Counts

a

(111)

Counts

Counts

6000

29

Page 29 of 31

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

an

us

cr

ip t

460

M

461

te

464

Ac ce p

463

d

462

30

Page 30 of 31

464

Highlights

465

● This study investigated the removal of AgNP suspensions by four regular

467

coagulants.

468

● The optimal removal efficiencies for the four coagulants were achieved at pH 7.5.

469

● The removal efficiency of AgNPs was affected by the natural water characteristics.

470

● TEM and XRD showed that AgNPs or silver-containing NPs were adsorbed onto the

471

flocs.

an

us

cr

ip t

466

472

M

473

Ac ce p

te

d

474

31

Page 31 of 31