Research Trends Measurements coefficients
coefficients materials
membranes
of -
(MF:
water
porous
average
0.8 and 8.0 pm) and ceramic
(CM:
average
pore
size of 4.4
as a function
relationship
NMR
between and
the
determined
by scanning
was examined. MF0.8
to
depend
this
affected
not but
membrane
matrix
Nitta,
the
the
pore
matrix.
>
the
membrane
during
the
predicting
by
an
Desalination 123(l)
Tanioka:
9-14 (30 August
desalt
water
water
Desalination
of surface water
treatment
total water
stage with
partial
membrane
without
using
retentates
that
this by
(MPRO)
(EDR),
thus gaining
matter,
fouling
was or
stage or
and
for
definitely
the
used to desalinate indicate
to desalinate
humic from
organic
substances,
are
a raw feed-water river
water
can be
H. Chmiel,
Desalination
123(l)
B. Heitele,
33-43
F. Riigener:
(30 August
Membranes
have
sought-after
in membrane
interest
low levels (less than ions,
which
effluent
200 ppm)
streams
in such diverse
expected
in a space
station
fisheries.
Ammonium
ions
decomposition
product
techniques
build
rendering
up the
in
unsuitable for
are used in various
such
as desalination,
great
treatment
degree
of
development of
which
membranes.
mitigation effort
by several
problems. around
@
water
purification
plants.
There
has been a
the
two-stage
simulated stage
aqueous
unit,
reduced
from
The volume
waste
200
the
over a 24 h period.
fouling
to solve fouling groups
from
of which
Whllb
treatment
(2.3 Whlkg)
lb of water
ppm
a
thus
by applying
team
Electrical was
for
based
a
a two-
could
be
1 ppm. kg) of
consumption to
be
on processing
for 5.04 225
Gaspar,
D.J. Helden, H.
H.V.
Zanapalidou:
Desalination 123(l) 85-92 (30 August
had under-
The Pitzer
calibrated
for RO
K,,
an experimental at a temperature
for the ionic strength ionic strengths, The
of
range O.Ol-O.lM.
the Pitzer model
observed
stable
(27 times the solubility and is under M.D.
was
super-
at 5°C) in the
is most likely caused
S.F.E. Boerlage,
by the low rate
investigation.
Kennedy,
G.J. Witkamp,
1999).
membrane contactor
contactors
is a device that achieves
or liquid/liquid
mass transfer
of one phase within
accomplished
by passing
another.
the fluids
sides of a microporous
membrane.
control
of the pressure
difference
fluids,
one of the fluids is located
so that
advantages
over conventional including
the
in the
of each pore. of important
dispersed-phase
the absence
of emulsions,
at high flow rates, no unloading
low flow rates,
no density
fluids is required, interfacial
By careful
the fluid/fluid
a number
contactors,
This is
between
at the mouth
offers
without
on opposite
is immobilised
of the membrane approach
difference
and surprisingly
area. Membrane
at
between
there is a high
contactors
typically
offer 30 times more area than what is achievable in
gas
absorbers,
obtainable leading geometries tube-side hand,
500 low of
are possible, mass
the most transfer
with reasonable
shell-side
times
coefficients
what
extraction
remarkably a number
received
predicted
and
in liquid/liquid to
Although have
per day. D.J.
30%.
when
prediction
no flooding
to be recycled
found
confirmed
that “organic?
of precipitation,
This
using
on 225 lb (102
matter)
by about
concentrates
accurate.
Seeded
and synthetic
Du Porn’s method
solubility
interface
was evaluated Using
organic
methods,
pores
wildlife.
to less than
E.F. Spiegel, EM. Thompson, Doan,
human
was evaluated
stream.
for a four-person ED1
as a
for
system
models.
of barium
and Bromley
dispersion as
over
ion content
was based
but
the
ED1
ammonium
water
on
members
a
Pitzer
and proved
Hollow-fibre
of the low concentrations
ions. The process
the
held as a joint
various
using
(EDI)
because
in
is the fouling
workshop was recently
organisations
world,
and
systems,
still remains
It attracted the
and plants
advancement
A
processes
processes.
industries
of membrane
“bottleneck”
most
(no
gas/liquid
and
supporting
and
determination
A membrane
commercial
are generated
concentration,
water and
this process
of the
in separation
They
waste-water
one
prediction,
of
applications
of urea,
the
to solubility
of
in recycled
and
in RO and
ofMembrane Science 159(1-2) 47;59 (1 July 1999).
of ammonium
found
on
study
J.I? van der Hoek, J.C. Schippers:/.
for the removal
are commonly
BaS04
effects
This
solubility
approaches
as Bromley
saturation
ions using
system
of
theoretical
For higher
1999).
rate matter
using more
more
A. Mesri:
exists for the development
an electrodialysis
of ammonium
become
and 47%,
M. Safar, S. Ebrahim,
consumption
1999).
42%
Desalination 123(l) 71-78 (30 August
Electra-deionisation
Fouling mitigation processes
96%,
and total
at the
are: inaccurate
for example,
pilot plant
Y. Al-Wazzan,
time
obtained. V. Mavrov,
were 99%,
barium
5-25°C
The
BOD
predicted 14 times at
precipitation.
gave accurate
respectively.
Current
yield and
by dissolved
COD,
operating
effect of ionic strength,
predicted
is a viable
this type of water.
in TDS,
investigated
organic
no effect on solubility.
water.
RO
or
super-saturation
sub-surface
that
solubility
concentrates
for the
an
method
a low
and/or
the
data
of on
and yet no scaling occurred
has
2200
method is based
was exceeded
prediction;
growth
to desalinate
to
This
Possible explanations
precipitation
such
colloidal
discusses
of performance
reverse reversal
product
so that
of up to 98%
be
reduce
Research
work
further
The
pressure
This
RO plant
values
of
to
to assess the economic
hours
results
extent
Therefore,
Scientific
of using RO technology water.
RO
and
feed-water. for
in
the
used
fouling
operating The
of
the
be
Removing ammonium electro-deionisation
biocides.
reuse. Scaling caused
fouling
example
prevented
can
a higher
prevented
stage
electrodialysis
for concentrate
by silicates
of the
osmosis
medium
osmosis possibilities
operation
on must
a project
sub-surface
to
but its use with
reliability
biological Institute
count in the pre-
reverse
inhibitors
of
concentrated
yield
alkaline
desalination
(LPRO),
softening
The
depends
in
used
(RO) severe
in RO concentrates,
limited
solubility
solubility
being
has not been investigated
before.
technology
is now
of feed-waters,
improvement By combining
that barium
RO system
(RO)
a variety
technique
1999).
45-53
80% recovery
osmosis
feasibility
A.
123(l)
Pant’s which
solubility
of 25°C.
osmosis
potentially
Du
and
in RO
in reverse and
scale,
barium
is unreliable temperature
Desalination
scaling decline
damage.
predicting
in this area.
Sub-surface
coefficient
the
updated
and the future
1999).
implemented
is
to provide
activities
prediction
BaSO,
pilot plant.
Kuwait
in
it aims
(current
(30 August
materials
increase
Natsuisaka,
and
work required)
diffusion
size.
M.
workshop,
suspended,
pore
sulfate flux
reviews
size
in the
Barium
work
was set. This which
directions
causes
was presented
area
pretreatment
and
were discussed,
in this
Results show
by a decrease
also
of MF8 by Tanner.
in the diffusion
only
diameter K.
theory, on
techniques
BaSO, solubility systems
and
bio-fouling.
research
Kuwait
water
in this
desalting
and possible
and ongoing
sub-surface
microscopy, of the
theory
of the membrane
that the decrease
as
covered
and a “road map” for future
Reverse
These were explained
diffusion
coefficients
The
structure,
is in the order
According
were
diffusion
electron
> CM > MF0.025.
-
water
magnitude
coefficient
thickness
inorganic
recent initiatives
mostly
R. Sheikholeslami:
time using
membrane
The
by the restricted
pm)
(PFG-NMR).
the
coefficient
diffusion
associated
information
membrane
of diffusion
field gradient
in
cellulose
pore sizes of
0.025,
pulsed
topics
information
Self-diffusion
measured
and discussed
Recent
of self-diffusion
inhomogeneous acetate
presented area. The
HTU
membrane hollow-fibre
attention.
values. module modules
In general,
coefficients accuracy.
is
columns,
can
be
On the other
are more difficult
to
Membrane Technology No. 119