Vol.
96, No.
September
BIOCHEMICAL
2, 1980 30,
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
Pages
1980
REMOVING BICARBONATE/CO2
785-792
REDUCES THE cGMP CONCENTRATION OF THE
VERTEBRATE PHOTORECEPTOR TO THE LEVELS NORMALLY OBSERVED ON ILLUMINATION Edward
P. Meyertholen,
Department
of Biological
Received
August
Meegan
Sciences,
J. Wilson
Purdue
and Sanford
University,
E. Ostroy
West Lafayette,
Indiana
11,198O
SUMMARY: Illuminating the toad retina or removing bicarbonate/C02 from the incubation solution reduces the cGMP concentration of the rod outer segment by approximately 65%. In the absence of bicarbonate/C02 the maximum light-induced changes in cGMP concentration were reduced by 75%. Electrophysiological experiments done under these conditions showed approximately a 45% linear reduction in receptor potential amplitude at all measured light intensities with no major changes of cell sensitivity or certain other properties. In many respects decreasing the cellular cGMP concentration by eliminating bicarbonate/ CO2 did not mimic the effect of light on the phototransduction or light adaptation properties of the vertebrate photoreceptor.
INTRODUCTION: intensely ual
The biochemistry
studied
transduction
decreases
models
duction
3).
phototransduction
(4,
5),
dibutyryl
measuring observing
centration
processes role
linking
testing
processes
of the
by illumination. of cGMP within
from vertebrate Thus its
role
change
effects
dark,
physiological
a major
concern
with
phototrans-
of cGMP in the have
in cGMP concentration
we are levels
8).
with
cGME', inhibitor)
We report
can be used
photoreceptor
here
to reduce
to the
level
normally
able
to alter
the
without
vis-
light-induced
of perfusion
(7,
the perfusate
in the
with
a phosphodiesterase
the photoreceptor
of bicarbonate/CO2
decrease
has been
of the photoreceptor
light-induced
electrophysiological
of cGMP into
has been
this
cell
associated
of the
the possible
adaptation of the
(1)
cGMP, or IMX (isobutylmethylxanthine,
cGMP concentration attained
of
the rate the
the
GMP) concentration
The methods
photoreceptor
The possible
have been proposed
or light
(6)) or injection elimination
to elucidate
and adaptation.
and several
involved
in attempts
in cGMP (cyclic
(2,
of the vertebrate
requiring
that the
coninjection
0006-291X/80/180785-08$01.00/0 785
Copyright 0 1980 by Academic Press, Inc. $1 rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
Vol.
96, No.
BIOCHEMICAL
2, 1980
or the addition
of extrinsic
effect
changes
of these
AND
artificial
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
inhibitors.
COMMUNICATIONS
We have also
on the electrophysiological
properties
observed
the
of the photo-
receptor. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Marine toads (Bufo marinus) were dark adapted for 24 -hours before all experiments. The composition of the bicarbonate solution was: Na+ 108 mM, Cl- 90.5 mM, HC03- 24 mM, K+ 2.5 mM, S04- 0.6 mM, Caft 1.0 mu, Mg* 1.6 mM, glucose 5.6 mM, and N-2-hydroxyethylpiperaxine-N'-Z-ethanewas equilibrated with a gas mixture of 95% sulfonic acid 3 mM. The solution 0215% CO2 and the pH was adjusted to 7.8. The solution without bicarbonate/ CO2 was identical to the control solution except that 24 mM NaCl was substiwas equilibrated with 100% Oz. The tuted for 24 mM NaHC03, and the solution small difference in free Ca* concentration between the two solutions due to bicarbonate binding (1.0 mM vs 0.9 mM) was found to have minimal effects on the measurements. For extracellular recording, 10 mM Na aspartate was added to both solutions. The methods for extracellular and intracellular recording have been described previously (9, 10). For the cGMP measurements the retina was excised free of pigment epithelium under infrared illumination. Incubations were carried out for 2 to 30 min in approximately 20 ml of solution. Full bleaching was attained by exposing the retina to room illumination for 5 minutes. To break off the rod outer segments the retina was transferred to a beaker containing 0.5 ml of the appropriate solution, shaken gently for 10 set and the retina was then removed. To stop all reactions, 0.5 ml of 30% TCA (trichloroacetic acid) was then added. To insure disruption of the rod outer segments, the mixture was frozen and thawed twice. The mixture was then centrifuged at 27,000x g for 15 min. The supernatant was washed four times with 5 ml of water-saturated ether to remove the TCA, and the acid free solution was air dried. The residue was reconstituted with 0.3 ml of 50 mM acetate buffer (pH 6.2) and the cGMR content was measured by the radioimmunoassay technique (Collaborative Research, Waltham, MA (11)). The TCA precipitates were dissolved in 0.3 ml of 1.0 N NaOH and protein amounts were determined using the method of Lowry --et al. (12). RESULTS:
As presented
outer
segments
bating
solution
ate/CO2 ing
there
is
reduced
were
of light There
or eliminating
protein). not
respectively
incubated
completely
elimination In the
from
decreases in
eliminated
that by the
removal
786
incu-
of bicarbon-
pmoles
cGME/mg protein.
Illuminat-
2 caused
and 28 (+2) -
toad
similar pmoles
solution photoreceptor
of bicarbonate/CO the effect
from the
in the presence
incubating
of the
photoreceptor
dark,
in cGMP concentration
the absence
indicates
error)
the
of toad
of bicarbonate/CO2
to 26 (+3) -
bicarbonate/CO2
further
This
cGMP concentration
the bicarbonate/CO
on the cGMP concentration
were
retinas
by the
77 (2 5, standard
cGMP concentration, removing
1 the
and by illumination.
the retinas
Thus
in Fig.
of light
on the
of bicarbonate/CG2.
in
cGMP/mg protein.
mimicked outer
on illumination 2, (to
decreases
the
effect
segment. of the
15 (51)
pmoles
cGMP concentration Approximately
cGMP/mg is 25%
Vol.
96, No.
2, 1980
Figure
(E) not
1.
BIOCHEMICAL
permanently
still
injuring
of the photoreceptor
cubating tional
in
8lOPHYSlCAL
to be present.
the This
cGMF', we performed
retinas is
also
seemed to slightly
were
illustrated reduce
the
determined
by the
final
ments
indicate
that
the effect
of the
incubating
These
experiments
show that
of transfer
between
cGMP concentration
were
observed
was of some interest
electrophysiological
responses
the
changes
of the
solution
the
photoreceptor.
787
the
addi-
the
final
on cGME' is
in cGIQ concentration
effect
in-
These
solutions.
2 to 30 minutes
to observe
Although
No time-dependent
solutions. from
incubating
the ability
the different
cGMP concentrations,
were
also
1.
we were
of experiments
between
in Fig.
that
altering
a series
transferred
concentrations
It
COMMUNICATIONS
To be certain
or permanently
the photoreceptor,
the dark,
transfer
appears
to regulate
solutions.
in 5 minutes
RESEARCH
Cyclic GMP Concentrations of Rod Photoreceptor Outer Segments. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. First four bar graphs present effects of various solutions with differing lightdark conditions. Second four bar graphs present effects of incubating only dark-adapted retinas in one solution for five minutes and transferring the retinas to a second solution for five minutes.
of the effect
in which,
AND
reversible.
occur effects
experi-
withon the
of incubation.
of bicarbonate/CO2 Representative
on the experi-
Vol.
96, No.
BIOCHEMICAL
2, 1980
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
11CI 1OC I
-
SO ,
-
80
Bkarbamte
/CO2 -/
, -
70 3 =a iy) 5i 40 M
30
20
10
0
60
5.5
50
4.5
Intensity
Figure
ments
Representative Extracellular Experiment Comparing the Effect of Bicarbonate/CO2 and Light on the Distal PI11 Responses of the Toad Retina (Bufo marinus). Light stimuli were 300 msec in duration with 3 minetweentimuli. The unattenuated stimulus light intensity (500 nm) was 1.4 x 10S5 W/cm2. Background light intensity (500 nm) was 1.4 x lo-11 W/cm2. Intensities were selected so that no stimuli were presented above cone threshold. The amplitudelight intensity relationship (V-log I) was determined after 84 min in the initial perfusion medium without bicarbonate/CO2 (perfusion rate 8 ml/min). The perfusate was then changed to include bicarbonatelC02. The bicarbonate/CO2 V-log I curve was determined after 84 minutes in that perfusate and the curve + background light after 107 min. The linear compression curve illustrates a 57% decrease of the bicarbonate/CO2 curve. This experiment is representative of 10 such solution changes with 8 separate retinas. (Observed decreases without bicarbonate/Cog, range 40-65X, average 53% -+ 6 standard error.)
illustrating
recording similar
2.
the
techniques results.
of the
data
are
obtained
presented
On removal
tude was observed effect
40
(-Lag)
both
in Figures
extracellular 2 and 3.
of bicarbonate/C02,
(57% of maximum,
removal
with
Fig.
of bicarbonate/CO2
Both
a decrease
2; 55% of maximum, was then
788
and intracellular
compared
techniques
gave
in response
ampli-
Fig.
3).
with
the effect
This of
Vol.
96, No.
BIOCHEMICAL
2, 1980
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
18
16
6
4.5
Figure
a steady
3.
linear
35 CLog)
3.0
25
Representative Intracellular Experiment Comparing the Effect of Bicarbonate/CO2 and Light on the Photoreceptor Responses of the Light stimuli were 200 msec in duraToad Retina (Bufo marinus). tion with 15 Kbzstimuli. The unattenuated stimulus light intensity (500 nm) was 2.3 x 10S6 W/cm2. The background light intensity (500 nm) was 1.5 x lo-lo W/cm2. Perfusion rate was approxiAfter a minimum of 5 minutes in the initial permately 4 mlimin. fusion solution, bicarbonate/C02, a V-log I curve was determined. The V-log I curve without bicarbonate/CO2 was started 9.5 min after changing solution. The linear compression curve illustrates a 55% decrease of the bicarbonate/C02 curve. This experiment is representative of 3 individual cells which were studied completely and 7 cells which were studied under various conditions and whose data were averaged. The only observed difference between the averaged cells and the data presented here was that some of the cells in solution without bicarbonate/CO2 showed a somewhat greater sensitivity.
background
maximum signal tion
40 Intensity
light
amplitude.
of bicarbonate/CO2 compression
selected
so that
The effects produced
of the original
are
decreases Signal
789
it
induced
clearly
the
same reduction
different.
in signal Amplitude-Light
amplitude
in
While
elimina-
which
were
Intensity
relation-
a
Vol.
96,
No.
ship
(see
light
Linear
caused
ties
Compression
significant
consistent
tebrate for
with
receptor
previous
Using
changing
to perfusate
cell
8 of 11 changes,
ate/CO2
caused
cells).
and Ostroy
effect
of light
responses.
in membrane
potential
Whereas
steady
background
(2 of 3 comparisons
of receptor
in the
time
(3 of 3 comparisons),
course
of the photoresponses
to peak
elimination sons;
maximum latency caused
total
DISCUSSION:
no clear
under
conditions
receptor,
are
comparable (6)
cGM-P, or dibutyryl concentration changes
in
presumably
that
without
reduce
started
at our
that We have
time-
total
effect
of the
(3 of 3 compariElimination
of bicar-
(2 of 3 comparisons)
of sensitivity
by Lipton
solution their
or
levels
--et al.
Since IMX,
altered
the
cGMP.
of cGMp and went
(6).
added
However,
injected
we
of the photo-
experiments
(7).
and then
that
and then
not observed
and Miller
media higher
latency,
in the
latency
to peak
obtained
the same range.
perfusion
the
decreases
the cGMP concentration
is possible
in their
compared
amplitudes),
of 1.8).
changes
mM bicarbonate
by Nicol
of
(2 of 3 comparisons).
to the results
reported
15
report
in the
the only
in the
time
with
the
also
decreases
similar
a factor
on the
effects
cGI@, it
latency
set,
bicarbon-
of the photoreceptor
and decreases
decreases
responses
used a 0.13
within
mM bicarbonate they
effect
The amplitude
--et al.
0.11
of the
observed
Lipton
were
change
time-course
with
that of the
with
with
we have
(3 of 3 comparisons);
of bicarbonate/CO2
bonate/C02 the
potentials
was observed
consistent
caused
potential
a depolarization
time-course
light
reported
the membrane
14 of 18 changes,
are
on the
on the ver-
results
to perfusate
experiments
and bicarbonate/CO2
the
it
caused
(in
In preliminary
(14).
with
recording,
hyperpolarization
intensi-
in maximum amplitude
affects
changing
light
of bicarbonate
and contrast
8 cells);
background
lower
changes
also
COMMUNICATIONS
the steady
at the
effects
bicarbonate/CO2
with
a cellular
Pinto
14, 15)
intracellular
without
The changes
of the
Bicarbonate/CO2
(16).
of the photoreceptor.
changes
The observed
(13,
RESEARCH
2 and 3),
amplitude
reports
potential
BIOPHYSICAL
in Figs.
changes).
an invertebrate
(in
AND
curve
signal
sensitivity
(i.e.,
are
8lOCHEMlCAL
2, 1980
cGMP
S-50
fold
they
used 24
Therefore
to even higher
Vol.
96, No.
2, 1980
levels.
We have not
definitive (14)]
compared
the cell
of cGMP. levels
induced
normally
decreasing
the
the
of light
the vertebrate
attained changes
the
remaining
However, cellular small
the
bicarbonate/CO2
from
the perfusate
as
on altering we do not yet adaptation
to reduce
the
by complete
concentrations light-induced
cellular
could
changes
it
is not
regards
However,
that
be interpreted
of cGMP some light-
did
not mimic
properties
concentration
of changes
electrophysiological as indicating
a critical
of cGMP do reflect
to the
In many respects
adaptation
to these
not
the
concentration
or light
of cGMP are
mech-
bicarbonate/C02
may indicate
also
understand
be produced.
by eliminating
critical
--et al.
way with
bleaching.
of cGMP can still
cGMP by Lipton
processes,
in a singular
The data
data
any and
data
are not
have
we [and Pinto
on the phototransduction
photoreceptor.
We do not that
Because
cGMP concentration
COMMUNICATIONS
depolarizations
or light
been able
cGMP in the photoreceptor
processes.
8).
the present
We have
concentration
effect
(7,
RESEARCH
experiments.
observed
phototransduction
to interpret
BIOPHYSICAL
comparable
on eliminating
and Miller
of the
to the
while
AND
to the hyperpolarizations
possible
of
for
observed
and Nicol
anisms
role
performed
explanations
Ostroy
(6)
BIOCHEMICAL
factor, some critical
that the step.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Supported in part by grants from the United States Public Health Service EYO0413 and GM07211 (E.M.). We thank Peter J. Stein for some preliminary experiments and Roberta A. Svoboda for her comments.
REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.
Miki,
N., Keirns, J. J., Marcus, F. R., Freeman, J., and Bitensky, M.W. 76:3820-3824. (1973). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. Farber, D. A., Brown, B. M., and Lolley, R. K (1978). Vision Res. -18: 497-499. Liebman, P. A. and Pugh, E. N. (1979). Vision Res. 19:375-380. J. Gen. zysiol. 73:629-653. Woodruff, M. L., and Bownds, M. D. (1979). Kilbride, P. and Ebrey, T. G. (1979). J. Gen. Physiol. 74:41%426. Lipton, S. A., Rasmussen, H., and Dowling J. E. (1977). 7. Gen. Physiol. 70:771-791. NicolFG. D. and Miller, W. H. (1978). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A -75: 5217-5220. Nicol, G. D. and Miller, W. H. (1979). Nature 280:64-66. Gedney, C. and Ostroy, S. E. (1978). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 188:105-113. J. Gen, Physiol. Lipton, S. A., Ostroy, S. E., and Dowling, J. E. (1977). 70:747-770 Stein=, A. L. (1973). Pbarm. Rev. 5:309-313.
791
Vol.
96, No.
12. 13. 14. 15. 16.
2, 1980
8lOCHEMlCAL
AND
Lowry,
BIOPHYSICAL
0. Ii., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, J. Biol. Chem. 193:265-275. Winkler, B. S., Sims= V., and Benner, Visual Sci. 16:766-768. Pinto, L. H. and ztroy, S. E. (1978). Flaming, D. G. and Brown, K. T. (1979). Brown, H. M., and Meech, R. W. (1979).
792
A. L., J.
RESEARCH
and Randall,
(1977).
Invest.
COMMUNICATIONS
R. J.
(1951).
Ophthalmol.
J. Gen. Physiol. 71:329-345. Nature 278:852-85. J. Physiz 297:73-93.