Vol. 52, No. 3, 1973
REPAIR
BIOCHEMICAL
SYNTHESIS
EXPOSED
AND
AND BIOPHYSICAL
SEDIMENTATION
TO DIMETHYLNITROSAMINE
Brian Cancer
AND
A.
Research
ANALYSIS
Centre,
and
Received
April
HUMAN
CELLS
Stich of
8,
DNA OF
DIMETHYLNITROSAMINE
H.F.
University
Vancouver
OF
ACTIVATED
Laishes”
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
British
Columbia
Canada
6,1973 SUMMARY
The capacity of dimethylnitrosamine(DMN), and of DMN activated by a NADPHfortified mouse liver microsomal preparation, ‘to elicit DNA alterations in cultured human iibroblasts was examined. A maximum induction of DNA repair synthesis, estimated by unscheduled incorporation of tritiated thymidine, occurred following 60-minute incubation of the human cells with DMN activated by a NADPHfortified mouse liver microsomal preparation. A low level of DNA repair activity followed exposure to DMN alone, or to DMN mixed with the microsomal preparation without NADPIH or without 02. The extent of DNA damage, estimated by velocity sedimentation of DNA through alkaline sucrose gradients, was maximum fol lowing treatment with DMN mixed with the NADPH-fortified microsomal preparation. The combined application of --in vitro activation systems and estimation of DNA repair synthesis in cultured cells may be exploited in the detection of precarcinogens.
INTRODUCTION DNA induced
repair
by
employed
to
isomers
of
synthesis
physical
(4).
and
chemical
between
between
l-hus,
in
cultured
the
identification
(2-5) high,
With
it
has
of human -the
Fellow
been
agents
weak,
and
potential
utilization
and
its
could
to
indicate
mammalian
active
DNA
ccl
non-oncogenic
4-nitropyridine-l-oxide
chemical
Is.
It
and between
N-hydroxy
and
K-region
epoxide
or
DNA
repair
its
that
the
measurement
be
developed
as
carcinogens
of
N-acetoxy
a screening with
was
derivatives (21,
and
changes
the
National
human
lymphocytes
Cancer
Institute
827
(5)
or
of
fibroblasts
Canada
the meta-
dihydrosynthe-
procedure distinct
for advantage
(6). of
the
in
and
proposed
cells
cells
of
applied
benzcajanthracene
mammalian
employing
Research
successfully
4-nitroquinoline-l-oxide
(3),
sis
*
or
been
Z-acetylaminofluorene
bolites
of
(1)
distinguish
precarcinogen
diol
has
(2-4)
as
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 52, No. 3, 1973
“receptor” stricted
in
not --in
that
require
--in
they
of metabolites
repair
synthesis In
in
in
can
we
following
vated
by
receptor
measured
as
sedimentation
the to
taken in
skin
from this
maintained fetal The
were in
calf
serum
cells
were
grown
the
activation
DNA
of the
deto
to
trigger
DNA
repair
in
cultured
(DMN)
human
and
(7,8). thymidine
to
DMN
DNA
repair
and
as
actiis
shifts
in
which
was
METHODS
cultured
from
4 or
5.
medium
skin-punch
200
mm glass
biopsy
woman.
Cel
Monolayers
of
f ibroblasts
supplemented
with
(MEM),
(penicillin
10x35
a
Caucasian
essential
antibiotics on
AND
passages
minimal
and
sufficient
tritiated
a 26-year-old
transfer
Eagle’s
utilization
precarcinogens
preparation
of
were of
of
do
(9-11).
fore-arm
study
that
therefore,
converting
of
microsome
incorporation
fibroblasts
the
the is,
alterations
level
MATER I ALS Human
for
dimethylnitrosamine
liver
profiles
re-
carcinogens
programs of
severely
cells.
compare
unscheduled
are
those
requisite
prescreening
DNA
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
repair
only
capable
exposure
DNA
detecting
induce
a NADPH-fortified
for
A prime or
human
study,
fibroblasts
in
procedures which
this
systems
useful
screening
activation
active
test
activation.
systems
velopment
vitro
are
metabolic
vitro
DNA
the
ce I I s,
AND BIOPHYSICAL
U/ml,
coverslips
and
kept
I cultures
used were 15%
streptomycin
in
40
stoppered
pg/ml)
Leighton
tubes. For male
Swiss
buffered (0.25
mice
were
saline M).
The
tissue
fraction
immediately
used
8.5
adjustment each umoles
was
Homogenizer
supernatant
system,
pooled
containing
Potter-Elvejhem
and
procedure,
of
the
Leighton NADPH,
the pH
homogenized
calcium
and
10
operating
at
1000
tube 25
umoles
7.0
with
contained magnesium
a
decapitated
ice-cold
magnesium by
from
of in
homogenized
activation to
livers
and
resulting for
the
12
(PBS;
rev./min.
experiments
following
from
chloride,
and
7.2)
the
sucrose of
min,
4O)
of
complete
activation
ymoles
a
post-mitochondrial
addition
ZOO-300 20
and
strokes
(10
For
microsomes
828
pH
The
centrifugation
M NaOH.
phosphate-
up-and-down
9,000xg
0.1
4 month-old
Dulbecco’s
ions
to
3 to
mg
I iver
glucose-Gphos-
was
co-factors
plus
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 52, No. 3, 1973
phate
(7,8).
tion
A solution
with
1.0
the
fortified
The
ml.
tightly
of
DMN
MEM was
activation
contents
were
stoppered
in
added
system
mixed
without
AND BIOPHYSICAL
to
give
thoroughly,
further
to
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
the total
flushed
agitation
at
cultures
in
reaction
volumes
with
37’
for
0, the
gas,
conjuncof
and
required
left incubation
period. For
analysis
of
tritiated
thymidine,
deficient
medium
order
to
with
20
Ci/mmol;
ADM
to
the
Fol
lowing
of
regular
M EDTA/0.075
buffer,
vortexed in ~1. (0.3
cell
the
pH 0.9
SW-40
10)
M NaCl An
cells at
0.03
and room
rotor
and
0.1
of
linear
top 0.3
temperature model
tube
was
a
L2-658
at
activity for
autora-
to
an
alkaline
aliquot
of
filled
with
ultracentrifuge
ml
mineral
gradients
3H-TdR
were
rinsed
4
0.5
ml (2
~1) overlay
to
were
hours. with
lOOOxg), 5-10~10~
ml)
gradient
oil.
20-24
min,
sucrose
lysing
added
EDTA/NaCI
and
a one
was
times
give (0.3
Cox,
of
buffer,
over
R.
Institute,
for
into
centri-
by
Research
uCi/ml
(Beckman
829
Farber
l-2
prepared 0.1
gradient
E.
pelletted
M Tris-HCI
and
the
specific
carcinogen,
(100-300
M NaOH,
(25O),
Dr.
scraped
added
M EDTA,
incubated
prepared
Fels
the
cultures
buffer was
additional
the
on
on
the
aggregates,
EDTA/NaCI
then
sucrose
of
7.51,
disperse
suspension
M NaCl,
M sucrose.
period an
sufficient
of to
cell
(pH
in
carcinogen
and
then
of
a concentration
buffer
carcinogen,
c3H-TdR,
alkaline
laboratory Sarma
the
to
by
exposure
at
treatment,
The
containing
of
medium
lightly
the
to
arginine-
(12).
repair
D.S.R.
Prior
M NaCl
sulfate,
2.3
used.
and
ADM
were
described
in
with
cultures
the
into
Following
thymidine
The
and
to
(1’2).
3 times
of
transferred
exposure
replication
tritiated
damage
incorporation
were
to
rinsed
previously
Abanobi,
carcinogen
solution
were
unscheduled
cultures prior
DNA
DNA
growth
0.024
100
days,
developed
was
resuspended
2-3
Nuclear).
as
S.E.
Philadelphia,
decyl
England
by
cell
10 $i/ml
el technique
Damjanov,
per
for
containing
analysis
fugation,
synthesis
coverslip
cultures
analysis For
I.
cell
New
diographic
repair
semiconservative
the
37O
the (ADM)
block
treatment,
DNA
and cells
of
0.5%
cold
a
lysing
sodium
do-
(5-20$, ml
solution After centrifuged Instruments
cushion was
a
added
lo-minute in
buckets Inc.,
5 ml) of on
top
lysis of Palo
Vol. 52, No. 3, 1973
Table
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
1.
DNA Repair Exposure Incomplete
Synthesis in Cultured DMN (~xIO-~M) and Activation Systems
to
Human Fibroblasts DMN (5x10-*M)
to
Table
GRA I NS/NUCLEUS
Contro I (No Treatment) DMN alone Activation System alone DMN plus Activation System DMN plus Activation System with N2 flush DMN plus Activation System without NADPH
0.0 0.5 0.3 23.2
UV UV
85.5
of
DMN Concentration Human Fibroblasts
(a) (b)
if.)
at
approximately
on the (60-minute
OF
DMN plus DMN alone
25,000
acid
acid
(TCA),
pierced insoluble collected
tubes,
and
assayed
radioactivity on
membrane
of DNA exposure)
(a)
(b)
3.6 8.4 14.2 16.8 17.6 21.3 19.3 17.2
0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7
activation
fractions and
Level
Repair
Synthesis
in
GRA INS/NUCLEUS
complete
rev./min
15 sequential
(11):
1.0
85.7
5.0x10-4 5.0x10-3 7.5x10-3 1 .ox1o-2 2.5x10-* 5.0x10-2 7.5x10-2 1.0x10-1
of
1.2
(900 ergs/mm*) (900 ergs/mm2) plus Activation System
CONCENTRATION DMN (mol/l)
bottom
60-Minute and
2.
Effect Cultured
Cal
Following Complete
plus
TREATMENT
Alto,
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
20’
for
30
of
16
drops
for was
system
min.
Following
each
radioactivity precipitated
filters,
washed
830
were as
with with
centrifugation, collected
from
previously 8-10s
TCA,
described trichloroacetic
dried,
and
counted.
the
Vol. 52, No. 3, 1973
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
30
. .... .... . :’ .. ‘..... ‘L..._ ..’ . ... / .‘...., ,’ ...i .-...... ..:..... ‘.......
25
/Y
/ ,:;c ,...g .:’ ;. .... :
?.I;:: ...Ai.: Z
+=B=fj
0
20
A
60
40 EXPOSURE
SO
TIME
RESULTS
ating
human
fied
mouse
ment
with
duced
in
toxic
exposed plete
ccl
plus
level
to
900
microsomal
DNA
of
DNA
repa
the obtain
system.
with
non-prolifera NADPH-forti-
treatment
NADPH
alone
or
This
without
against
further
information
on and
cells
the the
120
time min
the
question
DNA
repair
problem,
subsequently exhibited
831
the
for
raised
mixture
(12)
with
Exposure
1).
The
DMN
increased
activation
preparation.
in
incubated
without
i r synthesis
W-light
alone system in culthe
or
treat-
oxygen
in-
synthesis.
(Figure
ergs/mm2
occurred
DMN 1).
mixture
activation
activity
to
(Table
repair
to 5x10-‘M DMN complete activation DNA synthesis detection of
synthesis
exposure
activation
120
DISCUSSION
repair
fraction
DNA the
in of
To
the
of
a drop
Is.
of
following
level
plus
effects
level
microsomal
low
DMN
high
broblasts
liver
a very
5x10m2M
the
f
DMN
The
sult
vely
AND
100
I mlnuter1
Figure 1. Effect of duration of exposure and to 5x10e2M DMN plus (01O,A-A), (0 ..-. , A --- A) , on the level of unscheduled tured human fibroblasts. (Autoradiographic unscheduled incorporation of 3H-TdR)
A relati
.‘...
cell incubated
no
detectable
of
exposure
appeared of
to
to
re-
possible
mechanism
of
cultures with inhibition
were the
comof
Vol.
52,
No.
3, 1973
unscheduled for
BIOCHEMICAL
3H-TdR
up
to
120
The tivation A peak
incorporation
AND
by
BIOPHYSICAL
exposure
to
RESEARCH
the
complete
COMMUNICATIONS
activation
system
min.
effect
of
DMN
concentration,
system,
on
the
induction
activity
occurred
at
both of
5~10~~
DNA
with
and
repair
without
the
synthesis
M DMN mixed
with
was
the
complete
ac-
examined
complete
(Table
2).
activation
system. The shift
in
weight the
application the
following
3H-DNA
exposure
not
activation
tivation
the
and
to
of
DNA
DNA
show
damage
centrifugation
of
vation cultured detection
of
activated
DNA
DMN
cultured
mammalian chemical
be to
may
in
of exposure
also
to
that
the
no
induction
of
sucrose
incubations of
ac-
produced
alkaline
(Figure
converted
-~in that
cells.
the
gradients,
of lower
ZB),
in
the
fibro-
molecular
thus
is
it
an
utilized
832
DNA
weight
verifying
is
of
estimation a
changes
that
inducing
by
DNA
repair
economic
lead
to
after the
unscheduled
to The
a deto
profiles
(8).
and
NADPH-fortified
seem
interest
of rapid
the of
and
typhimurium
as
precarcinogens.
capable
gradients
connection, 2.
by
sedimentation
sucrose
in
vitro
These
shifts
with be
alone
shifts
a form
mutations
combination
cells,
can
by
this
with
occurring.
alkaline In
induced in
revealed
incubated
a heat-inactivated
show
weight
human
through
3H-TdR.
procedure,
fact
system
as
DMN
of
that
in
breaks
only
in
molecular
a one-hour
DMN
a
profiles
with
5x10m2M
produced
lower DMN
following
Post-treatment
molecular
activation
single-strand
incorporation
is
DMN.
revealed
sedimentation
sedimentation
medium
higher
damage
results
of
of
5x10-*M
observations
velocity
culture of
microsomal
tectable
by
to
DMN mixed to
These
activation
regular
a
liver
measured an
regions
28).
technique
a region
The
5x10A2M
Exposure
(Figure
to
The
position
only
profiles repair
28).
system
to
ceils
(Figure control
ZA).
gradient
3H-DNA
cultured
the
on
in
the
from
as
dependent
of
system
effect
blasts
of
(Figure
damage,
sucrose
change
system
discernible
is
alkaline profile
activation
did
a DNA
the
sedimentation
complete
the
of
note
--in
that
vitro
acti-
synthesis tool
in for
the
Vol. 52, No. 3, 1973
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Alkaline sucrose gradient sedimentation profiles of Figure 2. 3H-DNA released from cultured human fibroblasts exposed for 60 minutes to: A) No treatment (control) (0-O); activation system only or 5x10w2M DMN plus heat-inactivated activation system (superimposable profiles) (A**-=A); B) 5x10w2M DMN alone (0-O); 5x10m2M DMN plus complete activation system (A----A) ; 5x10m2M DMN plus complete activation system with a 4-hour post-treatment incubation in fresh medium co- -0). The horizontal bar designates the position of control DNA peaks.
Acknowledgements We are grateful to Drs. J.A. Miller and E.C. Miller, McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin, and to Drs. E. Farber and D.S.R. Sarma, Fels Research Institute, Temple University School of Medicine, for technical advice. This study was supported by the National Cancer Institute of Canada and the National Research Council of Canada. REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12.
Rasmussen, R.E., and Painter, R.B. J. Cell Biol. 2, 11 (1966). Stich, H.F., San, R.H.C., and Kawazoe, Y. Nature 229, 416 (1971). Stich, H-F., San, R.H.C., Miller, J.A., and Mi I ler, E.C. Nature New Biology 238, 9 (1972). Stich, H.F., and San, R.H.C. Proc. Sot. Exp. Biol. and Med. 142, 155 (1973). Lieberman, M.W., Baney, R.N., Lee, R.E., Sell, S., and Farber, E. Cancer Res. 31, 1297 (1971). Stich, H.F. In: Topics in Chemical Carcinogenesis, Takayama, S., Sugimura, T., and OdashimaTS. (Editors). University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 17-28 (1972) Garner, R.C., Miller, E.C., Miller, J.A., Garner, J.V., and Hanson, R.S. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 5, 774 (1971). Mal Iing, H.V. Mutation Res. 13, 425 (1971). McGrath, R.A., and Wi I I iams, R.W. Nature 212, 534 (1966). Lett, J.T., Caldwell, I., Dean, C.J., and Alexander, P. Nature 214, 790 (1967). Laishes, B.A., and Stich, H.F. Can. J. Biochem. (1973, in press). Stich, H.F., and San, R.H.C. Mutation Res. lo, 389 (1970).
833